DOCSLIB.ORG

Gloucester, Cheltenham and Tewkesbury Joint Core Strategy 2011-2031 1 Adopted December 2017 Foreword

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gloucester, Cheltenham and Tewkesbury Joint Core Strategy 2011-2031 1 Adopted December 2017 Foreword Gloucester, Cheltenham and Tewkesbury Joint Core Strategy 2011 - 2031 Adopted December 2017 Gloucester, Cheltenham and Tewkesbury Joint Core Strategy 2011-2031 1 Adopted December 2017 Foreword Welcome to the adopted Joint Core Strategy (JCS) of the three Councils: Gloucester City, Cheltenham Borough and Tewkesbury Borough. As the centre of Gloucestershire for economic development, it is vital to have an up to date development plan for the area and after a rigorous process of preparation, consultation and examination, the JCS was adopted on 11 December 2017. The JCS sets out the amount of new homes, jobs and supporting infrastructure that is Paul James needed to 2031 and details the strategy for how this development is to be delivered in a managed and resilient way whilst protecting our exceptional natural and built environment. This adopted plan has been shaped by the thousands of responses received at earlier stages of the project and we wish to thank those residents, community groups, businesses and service providers who all helped to create the plan and we ask that everyone continues to work together to deliver the JCS and its aims. Steve Jordan Dave Waters Gloucester, Cheltenham and Tewkesbury Joint Core Strategy 2011-2031 2 Adopted December 2017 Contents PART 1 – INTRODUCTION Page 4 PART 2 – VISION AND OBJECTIVES Page 7 PART 3 – STRATEGIC POLICIES Page 16 Policy SP1: The Need for New Development Page 16 Policy SP2: Distribution of New Development Page 17 PART 4 – SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT POLICIES Page 27 Policy SD1: Employment – Except Retail Development Page 27 Policy SD2: Retail and City / Town Centres Page 33 Policy SD3: Sustainable Design and Construction Page 38 Policy SD4: Design Requirements Page 41 Policy SD5: Green Belt Page 47 Policy SD6: Landscape Page 52 Policy SD7: The Cotswolds Area Of Outstanding Natural Beauty Page 54 Policy SD8: Historic Environment Page 56 Policy SD9: Biodiversity and Geodiversity Page 59 Policy SD10: Residential Development Page 61 Policy SD11: Housing Mix and Standards Page 63 Policy SD12: Affordable Housing Page 67 Policy SD13: Gypsies, Travellers and Travelling Showpeople Page 71 Policy SD14: Health and Environmental Quality Page 74 PART 5 – INFRASTRUCTURE POLICIES Page 76 Policy INF1: Transport Network Page 77 Policy INF2: Flood Risk Management Page 80 Policy INF3: Green Infrastructure Page 84 Policy INF4: Social and Community Infrastructure Page 87 Policy INF5: Renewable Energy / Low Carbon Energy Development Page 89 Policy INF6: Infrastructure Delivery Page 91 Policy INF7: Developer Contributions Page 93 PART 6 – Strategic AllocationS Page 95 Policy SA1: Strategic Allocations Policy Page 95 Policy A1: Innsworth & Twigworth Page 98 Policy A2: South Churchdown Page 99 Policy A3: North Brockworth Page 100 Policy A4: North West Cheltenham Page 101 Policy A5: Ashchurch Page 102 Policy A6: Winneycroft Page 103 Policy A7: West Cheltenham Page 104 PART 7 – MONITORING AND REVIEW Page 105 Policy REV1: Gloucester and Tewkesbury Housing Supply Review Page 108 APPENDICES Page 119 Gloucester, Cheltenham and Tewkesbury Joint Core Strategy 2011-2031 3 Adopted December 2017 PART 1 - Introduction ‘The purpose of planning is to help achieve sustainable development...’ 1.1 In addition to the quote above, the ministerial So sustainable development is about positive foreword to the National Planning Policy growth – making economic, environmental Framework (NPPF) says: and social progress for this and future generations. ‘Sustainable means ensuring that better lives for ourselves don’t mean worse lives The planning system is about helping to make for future generations. this happen.’ Development means growth. We must accommodate the new ways by which we 1.2 A key component in ‘helping to make this will earn our living in a competitive world. happen’ are development plan documents We must house a rising population, which is prepared by the Local Planning Authority. In living longer and wants to make new choices. a plan-led system, planning applications are We must respond to the changes that new required to be determined in accordance with technologies offer us. Our lives, and the the development plan unless material planning places in which we live, can be better, but considerations indicate otherwise. In fulfilling they will certainly be worse if things stagnate. this critical role, it is clearly important that the development plan is up-to-date and backed by Sustainable development is about change sound evidence so that its policies can be relied for the better, and not only in our built upon by stakeholders and decision-takers. environment. What is the Joint Core Strategy? (JCS) Our natural environment is essential to our wellbeing, and it can be better looked after 1.3 The JCS is an important part of the development than it has been. Habitats that have been plan for Gloucester City, Cheltenham Borough degraded can be restored. Species that have and Tewkesbury Borough and covers the area been isolated can be reconnected. Green Belt shown on the map on page 5. As a planning land that has been depleted of diversity can document, which looks to reflect the priorities be refilled by nature – and opened to people of government, residents, businesses, local to experience it, to the benefit of body service providers and other stakeholders, the and soul. JCS has been prepared within the context of national policy and having regard to the diverse Our historic environment – buildings, aspirations and local characteristics that make landscapes, towns and villages – can better up the area. be cherished if their spirit of place thrives, rather than withers. Our standards of design can be so much higher. We are a nation renowned worldwide for creative excellence, yet, at home, confidence in development itself has been eroded by the too frequent experience of mediocrity. Gloucester, Cheltenham and Tewkesbury Joint Core Strategy 2011-2031 4 Adopted December 2017 1.4 The JCS sets out the long-term vision and 1.5 Whilst the JCS provides the higher level or objectives for the area together with strategic strategic part of the development plan for the policies for shaping new development and area, more detailed, locally-specific planning locations for new development up to 2031. policies will be set out in the Gloucester City Together, these policies help to provide a Plan, Cheltenham Plan and Tewkesbury Borough strategic planning framework for the JCS area, Plan, collectively called District plans. These will which guides future planning decisions and include local allocations of land for development helps to achieve the overall vision for the area. and local policies to guide decisions on planning applications. They also form part of the development plan and will need to reflect and be consistent with the policies in the JCS as set out in the diagram on page 8. Gloucester, Cheltenham and Tewkesbury Joint Core Strategy 2011-2031 5 Adopted December 2017 1.6 The same applies to neighbourhood plans. 1.7 Saved policies in the City and Borough Plans Where a parish or other designated community that remain as part of the development plan wishes to prepare a neighbourhood plan for beyond the adoption of the JCS are provided at their area, it must be in general conformity Appendix 1. In time these will be replaced by with strategic policies in the development plan policies in the new District plans. documents. Whilst neighbourhood plans can promote more development than is set out in 1.8 More information on the documents that each the JCS or district plans, they cannot be used of the local authorities is preparing is available to stop new development proposed in other on the websites of Gloucester City, Cheltenham development plan documents (DPDs). Borough and Tewkesbury Borough councils. The JCS authorities will work with town 1.9 In accordance with the Town and Country and parish councils and community Planning (Local Planning) England Regulations groups to provide advice in producing 2012, the maps accompanying this document neighbourhood plans. illustrate geographically the application of policies. Gloucester, Cheltenham and Tewkesbury Joint Core Strategy 2011-2031 6 Adopted December 2017 PART 2 - Vision & Objectives 2.1 Having considered the key challenges for Tewkesbury Sustainable Community Strategy the JCS area, established through earlier Vision 2008-2028 consultations, a vision has developed which sets out what type of place the JCS area will 2.4 A borough of healthy, strong, thriving and be by 2031 (the end date of the JCS). sustainable communities, both rural and urban, where people want to live, work and visit. The starting point for the JCS vision was the three Sustainable Community Strategy 2.5 The JCS vision has been further refined through visions already identified through engagement and discussion with stakeholders, community consultation. the JCS Sustainability Appraisal and the JCS evidence base, including extensive public The Gloucester City Vision 2012-2022 consultation. Whilst being aspirational, the vision for the JCS area is deliverable and seeks to 2.2 Gloucester will be a flourishing, modern and bring forward change in a manner that reflects ambitious City, which all residents can enjoy. We what is important to Gloucester, Cheltenham will work to encourage sustainable economic and Tewkesbury and their communities. growth for the City’s expanding population by driving forward its regeneration programme. This will strengthen the City, particularly its centre and make the most of our infrastructure. Cheltenham Sustainable Community Strategy Vision 2008-2028 2.3 We want Cheltenham to deliver a sustainable quality of life, where people, families, their communities and businesses thrive, and in a way which cherishes our cultural and natural heritage, reduces our impact on climate change and does not compromise the quality of life of present and future generations. Gloucester, Cheltenham and Tewkesbury Joint Core Strategy 2011-2031 7 Adopted December 2017 Vision By 2031 Gloucester City, Cheltenham Borough and Tewkesbury Borough will have continued to develop as highly attractive and accessible places in which to live, work and socialise.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gloucestershire Economic Needs Assessment
    GL5078P Gloucestershire ENA For and on behalf of Cheltenham Borough Council Cotswold District Council Forest of Dean District Council Gloucester City Council Stroud District Council Tewkesbury Borough Council Gloucestershire Economic Needs Assessment Prepared by Strategic Planning Research Unit DLP Planning Ltd August 2020 1 08.19.GL5078PS.Gloucestershire ENA Final GL5078P Gloucestershire ENA Prepared by: Checked by: Approved by: Date: July 2020 Office: Bristol & Sheffield Strategic Planning Research Unit V1 Velocity Building Broad Quay House (6th Floor) 4 Abbey Court Ground Floor Prince Street Fraser Road Tenter Street Bristol Priory Business Park Sheffield BS1 4DJ Bedford S1 4BY MK44 3WH Tel: 01142 289190 Tel: 01179 058850 Tel: 01234 832740 DLP Consulting Group disclaims any responsibility to the client and others in respect of matters outside the scope of this report. This report has been prepared with reasonable skill, care and diligence. This report is confidential to the client and DLP Planning Ltd accepts no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report or any part thereof is made known. Any such party relies upon the report at their own risk. 2 08.19.GL5078PS.Gloucestershire ENA Final GL5078P Gloucestershire ENA CONTENTS PAGE 0.0 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... 6 1.0 Introduction...................................................................................................................... 19 a) National
    [Show full text]
  • (PPG) MEETING – 1430 on 3 SEP 19 Present
    4 Sep 19 THE ALNEY PRACTICE – PRACTICE PARTICIPATION GROUP (PPG) MEETING – 1430 ON 3 SEP 19 Present: Apologies Philip Tagg (PT) Practice Manager Katherine Holland (KH) Rachael Banfield (RB) Health Care Assistant CCG Jeremy Base (JB) Pamela Dewick (KD) Jennifer Taylor (JT) Geoffrey Gidley (GG) Megan Birchley (MB) Mark Weaver (MW) Ken Newman (KN) Nadia Schneider (NS) Carol Kurylat (CK) Taras Kurylat (TK) Denise Leach (DL) Nicky Milligan (NM) 1. PT welcomed attendees to the meeting and thanked them for expressing an interest in establishing a PPG. He explained the background to the former PPGs for the pre-merger practices: • Cheltenham Road Surgery’s PPG was made up of members of the ‘Friends of Cheltenham Road Surgery’, which was a registered charity with the principal aim of raising funds for the surgery, to be spent to the benefit of its patients. The Friends ceased to operate several years ago when several of the members became too old to continue and there were no volunteers willing to take on committee roles. Subsequent attempts to create a replacement PPG were unsuccessful. • College Yard and Highnam had a PPG, which ceased to be active around the time of the merger. 2. PPGs aim to be representative of the practice population and have a principal aim of meeting on regular basis to discuss the services on offer, and how improvements can be made for the benefit of patients and the practice. This initial meeting aimed to set the scene and agree a way ahead. PT also indicated that as a result of the practice merger we will be liable for a CQC inspection before the end of Mar 20, with the potential that they will wish to speak with the PPG at that time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Severn, As Were Smaller Barges Often Pulled by Men (Termed Times of Drought Across the Severn
    Ferries, bridges and Industry, trade and transport battles From medieval times two water mills existed where the present 18th century Big, flat- bottomed, square-sailed trows, many doubtless built locally, were The Lower Lode just south of the Ham was the site of a ferry and a ford at Abbey Mill now stands. This mill features as Abel Fletcher’s Mill in Mrs. Craik’s prolific on the Severn, as were smaller barges often pulled by men (termed times of drought across the Severn. A second ferry was situated further novel “John Halifax, Gentleman” and is now converted into flats. In 1865 a “bow-hauliers”) walking along the banks. Men were replaced by horses in upstream at the Upper Lode. An important road crossed the Ham to this new steam-driven Town Mill, also known as Healings Mill, was built next the 1830s. second ferry. These ancient river crossings were significant factors in the to the Ham’s town quay and adjacent malt houses and warehouses. It was “The Severn Trow”, “The Mermaid”, “The Admiral Benbow” and “The Star” location of the battle of Tewkesbury in 1471; the Ham became a killing then the largest and most efficient mill in the country. A fleet of barges and once stood on the quayside, places for quenching the thirst of many a field for remnants of the Lancastrian army trying to cross the Swilgate. a railway that crossed the Avon at the bottom of Quay Street onto the Ham boatman, mill-hand, maltster or warehouseman. transported grain and flour. The railway closed in 1961; the barges were sold Telford’s Mythe Bridge built in 1826 largely replaced the other Severn Despite alternative site considerations, Parliamentary defeats, problems with and the mill now stands empty awaiting its destiny.
    [Show full text]
  • Sodomy, the Courts and the Civic Idiom in Eighteenth-Century Bristol
    Urban History, 34, 1 (2007) C 2007 Cambridge University Press Printed in the United Kingdom doi:10.1017/S0963926807004385 ‘Bringing great shame upon this city’: sodomy, the courts and the civic idiom in eighteenth-century Bristol STEVE POOLE∗ School of History, University of the West of England, Bristol, St Matthias Campus, Bristol BS16 2JP abstract: During the 1730s, Bristol acquired an unenviable reputation as a city in which sodomy was endemic and rarely punished by the civil power. Although the cause lay partly in difficulties experienced in securing convictions, the resolve of magistrates was exposed to fierce scrutiny.Taking an effusive curate’s moral vindication of the city as a starting point, this article examines the social production of sodomy in eighteenth-century Bristol, analyses prosecution patterns and considers the importance of collective moral reputation in the forging of civic history. The Saints Backsiding In 1756, Emanuel Collins, curate, schoolmaster and doggerel poet, penned an extraordinary moral vindication of the city of Bristol, following the public disclosure of a pederasty scandal in the Baptist College and the flight of a number of suspects. In a rare flash of wit, he entitled it, The Saints Backsiding. Not for the first time, it appeared, Collins’ home city was being whispered about elsewhere as a place in which sodomitical transgression was both endemic and unpunished. ‘I am not unacquainted with the many foul reflections that have been cast on my Fellow-Citizens of BRISTOL concerning this most abominable vice’, Collins began, but ‘tis the fate of all cities to be the conflux of bad men.’ They go there ‘to hide themselves in the multitude and to seek security in the crowd’.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gloucestershire Urban Economic Strategy 2007-2015
    DRAFT Gloucestershire First 26 April 07 THE GLOUCESTERSHIRE URBAN ECONOMIC STRATEGY 2007-2015 INTRODUCTION 1. Urban Gloucestershire lies astride the M5 and is made up of Gloucester City, Cheltenham Borough and parts of the Borough of Tewkesbury and Stroud District. With a total population of 310,800 and forecast by 2026 to be at least 370,800 this is a significant urban conurbation particularly in regional terms, as evidenced by the identification of Gloucester and Cheltenham in the draft Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS) as two of the regionally Strategically Significant Cities and Towns (SSCTs)1. Within the Gloucestershire economy this urban area plays a vital role. Defining Urban Gloucestershire Urban Gloucestershire cannot be delineated precisely on a map without limiting some initiatives unnecessarily. In general it is those geographical areas of the Central Vale that have a concentration of people and businesses that by working together can complement one another and increase the economy of Gloucestershire. It therefore includes the whole of Gloucester City and Cheltenham Borough. It also will generally include, within Tewkesbury Borough, Tewkesbury Town and Ashchurch as well as the parishes of Brockworth, Hucclecote, Churchdown, Innsworth, Longford and embraces Gloucestershire Airport and Dowty/Smiths, although there are some aspects of these that are also 'rural' and will also be covered by the Gloucestershire Rural Economic Strategy. Similarly it will also generally include in Stroud District the settlements of Hardwicke and those others that comprise the defined Stroud Urban Area: Stonehouse, Stroud, Thrupp, North and South Woodchester and Nailsworth, although parts of these are also 'rural'. Economic and administrative boundaries are not identical.
    [Show full text]
  • 4542 the London Gazette, 21 August, 1953
    4542 THE LONDON GAZETTE, 21 AUGUST, 1953 Railway Line by way of an overhead reinforced Standish—Hope Cottage, Gloucester Road, Stone- concrete footbridge with approaches. house. A certified copy of the Order and of the map con- Tirley—Torsend Cottage, Tirley. tained in the Order as confirmed by the Minister has Twigworth—c/o Mr. E. J. Jones, Far End, Twig- been deposited at the Council Offices, Argyle Road* worth. Sevenoaks, and will be open for inspection free of Upton St. Leonards—'Village Hall, Upton St. charge between the hours of 9 a.m. and 5.30 p.m. on Leonards. Weekdays and between 9 a.m. and 12 noon on Westbury-on-Severn—Lecture Hall, Westbury-on- Saturday. Severn. The Order becomes operative as from 'the 21st Whitminster—c/o iMr. A. E. Wyer, The Garage, day of August, 1953, but if any person aggrieved Whitminster. by the Order desires to question the validity thereof In exceptional circumstances special arrangements or of any provision contained therein on the grounds will be made for the draft map and statement to be that it is not within the powers of the National Parks inspected out of office hours. and Access to the Countryside Act, 1949, or on the Any objection or representation with respect to ground -that any requirement of the Act or any the draft map or statement may be sent in writ- regulation made thereunder has not been complied ing to the undersigned before the 30th day of April, with in relation to the approval of the Order he 1954, and any such objection or representation should may.
    [Show full text]
  • Uk Capacity Reserve Limited Bristol Road, Gloucester, Gl2 5Ya
    UK CAPACITY RESERVE LIMITED BRISTOL ROAD, GLOUCESTER, GL2 5YA Property Investment Secure RPI income Energy Power Plant INVESTMENT SUMMARY Opportunity to acquire a well let electricity supply plant with RPI uplifts Freehold site extending to approximately 1.5 acres Let to UK Capacity Reserve Limited on an FRI lease from 12th May 2015 and expiring on 11th May 2040 with a tenant’s break clause on 31st December 2033 providing 13 years term certain. Topped up rent of £105,000 pa with upward only RPI uplifts every 5 years. Good covenant strength Offers in excess of £1,450,000 (One Million Four Hundred and Fifty Thousand Pounds) subject to contract and exclusive of VAT which reflects a net initial yield of 6.83% after allowing for purchasers’ costs of 6.08% LOCATION The Cathedral City of Gloucester is the administrative centre of the county and lies approximately 104 miles west of London, 55 miles south of Birmingham, 34 miles north of Bristol and 8 miles south west of Cheltenham. Gloucester has good road communications from the A40/A38 with direct access to the M5 at Junction 11, 11a and 12. The M5 provides a continuous motorway link to the M4, M50, M6 and M42. The city has excellent rail services, with the minimum journey time to London Paddington 1 hour 45 minutes. SITUATION The property is positioned off the Bristol Road to the south of Gloucester Town Centre in an established commercial area including car dealerships, trade counter units, self storage, retail warehousing and petrol filling stations PROPERTY COVENANT STRENGTH Freehold site extending to approximately 1.5 acres and let UK Capacity Reserve Limited is a leading provider of flexible to UK Capacity Reserve Limited and utilized as an power capacity to the UK electricity market.
    [Show full text]
  • Mark Chadwick Hunter Page Planning 18 High Street Cheltenham Gloucestershire GL50 1DZ Our Ref: APP/G1630/V/14/2229497 31 March
    Mark Chadwick Our Ref: APP/G1630/V/14/2229497 Hunter Page Planning 18 High Street Cheltenham Gloucestershire GL50 1DZ 31 March 2016 Dear Sir TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 – SECTION 77 APPLICATION BY ERLP AND THE MERCHANT VENTURERS LAND AT ‘PERRYBROOK’ TO THE NORTH OF BROCKWORTH AND SOUTH OF THE A417, BROCKWORTH, GLOUCESTERSHIRE APPLICATION REF: 12/01256/OUT 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of the Inspector, Mrs KA Ellison BA, MPhil, MRTPI, who held a inquiry from 28-30 July 2015 into your client’s application to Tewkesbury Borough Council (‘the Council’) for outline planning permission for the mixed use development of up to 1,500 dwellings including extra care housing, community facilities including Al, A2, A3, A4 and A5 local retail shops, B1 /B8 employment uses, D1 health facilities and formal/informal public open space, in accordance with application ref 12/01256/OUT, dated 5 December 2012. 2. On 24 November 2014, the Secretary of State directed, in pursuance of Section 77 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, that your client’s application be referred to him instead of being dealt with by the local planning authority, Tewkesbury Borough Council, after consideration of policy on calling-in applications. Inspector’s recommendation and summary of the decision 3. The Inspector recommended that the application be approved and planning permission granted. For the reasons given below, the Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s recommendation. A copy of the Inspector’s report (IR) is enclosed.
    [Show full text]
  • Census Briefing for Commissioners
    Census Briefing for Commissioners Louise Li Strategic Needs Analysis Performance and Need Gloucestershire County Council October 2013 Contact: [email protected] 01452 328555 Census Briefing for Commissioners CONTENT Summary Page 3-8 Purpose of the Paper 9 The Census 2011 9 The Population 9-11 The Environment 12-14 The Communities 15-18 Children, Young People and Families 19-21 Working in Gloucestershire 22-24 Health and Care 25-27 ******************************************************* Appendices (Maps) Page 28-29 Appendix 1: Population Density in Gloucestershire Appendix 2: Proportion of Households with Access to a Car Appendix 3: Number of Households Deprived in 3 or More Dimensions Appendix 4: Proportion of Out-of-Work Households with Dependent Children 2 Census Briefing for Commissioners SUMMARY The Population (page 9-11) With a population of 596,984, Gloucestershire was the second most populated county in the region in 2011. There were an additional 1,100 non-UK short-term residents who were not counted as usual residents on the Census day. The population growth rate between 2001 and 2011 at 5.7%, or an annual growth of 3,200 people, was lower than the national average of 7.8%. A third of the growth was attributable to Gloucester where demographic demand for services and infrastructure would have surged during the period. The current population consisted of 136,600 children and young people aged 0- 19, 349,000 adults aged 20-64, and 111,400 older people aged 65 or above. This included an increase in the working age and the older population, and a small reduction in the number of children and young people in the previous 10 years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iron Age Tom Moore
    The Iron Age Tom Moore INTRODUCfiON In the twenty years since Alan Saville's (1984) review of the Iron Age in Gloucestershire much has happened in Iron-Age archaeology, both in the region and beyond.1 Saville's paper marked an important point in Iron-Age studies in Gloucestershire and was matched by an increasing level of research both regionally and nationally. The mid 1980s saw a number of discussions of the Iron Age in the county, including those by Cunliffe (1984b) and Darvill (1987), whilst reviews were conducted for Avon (Burrow 1987) and Somerset (Cunliffe 1982). At the same time significant advances and developments in British Iron-Age studies as a whole had a direct impact on how the period was viewed in the region. Richard Hingley's (1984) examination of the Iron-Age landscapes of Oxfordshire suggested a division between more integrated unenclosed communities in the Upper Thames Valley and isolated enclosure communities on the Cotswold uplands, arguing for very different social systems in the two areas. In contrast, Barry Cunliffe' s model ( 1984a; 1991 ), based on his work at Danebury, Hampshire, suggested a hierarchical Iron-Age society centred on hillforts directly influencing how hillforts and social organisation in the Cotswolds have been understood (Darvill1987; Saville 1984). Together these studies have set the agenda for how the 1st millennium BC in the region is regarded and their influence can be felt in more recent syntheses (e.g. Clarke 1993). Since 1984, however, our perception of Iron-Age societies has been radically altered. In particular, the role of hillforts as central places at the top of a hierarchical settlement pattern has been substantially challenged (Hill 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Finham Sewage Treatment Works Thermal Hydrolysis Process Plant and Biogas Upgrade Plant Variation Applications
    Finham Sewage Treatment Works Thermal Hydrolysis Process Plant and Biogas Upgrade Plant Variation Applications | 0.2 July 2020 Severn Trent Water EPR/YP3995CD/V006 Thermal Hy drolysis Process Pla nt a nd Biogas Up gra de Plan t Va ria tion Ap plica tions Sever n Tr ent Wa ter Thermal Hydrolysis Process Plant and Biogas Upgrade Plant Variation Applications Finham Sewage Treatment Works Project No: Project Number Document Title: Thermal Hydrolysis Process Plant and Biogas Upgrade Plant Variation Applications Document No.: Revision: 0.2 Document Status: <DocSuitability> Date: July 2020 Client Name: Severn Trent Water Client No: EPR/YP3995CD/V006 Project Manager: Mark McAree Author: James Killick File Name: Document2 Jacobs U.K. Limited Jacobs House Shrewsbury Business Park Shrewsbury Shropshire SY2 6LG United Kingdom T +44 (0)1743 284 800 F +44 (0)1743 245 558 www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2019 Jacobs U.K. Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. Document history and status Revision Date Description Author Checked Reviewed Approved i Thermal Hydrolysis Process Plant and Biogas Upgrade Plant Variation Applications Contents Non-Technical Summary..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Related Alterations) Order 2009
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2009 No. 532 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The Tewkesbury (Related Alterations) Order 2009 Made - - - - 6th March 2009 Coming into force in accordance with article 1(2) and (3) Under section 9(6) of the Local Government and Rating Act 1997(a) (“the 1997 Act”) Tewkesbury Borough Council(b) made proposals to the Electoral Commission for the related alteration of the boundaries of county electoral divisions and district wards within the Council’s area. The Electoral Commission have decided to give effect to the proposals and in exercise of the powers conferred by section 14(1A) of the 1997 Act(c) make the following Order: Citation and commencement 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the Tewkesbury (Related Alterations) Order 2009. (2) This Order, with the exception of article 4, comes into force— (a) for the purpose of proceedings preliminary or relating to the elections of councillors for county electoral divisions, on the day after that on which it is made; (b) for all other purposes, on the ordinary day of election of councillors in 2009. (3) Article 4 comes into force— (a) for the purpose of proceedings preliminary or relating to the elections of councillors for district wards, on 15th October 2010; (b) for all other purposes, on the ordinary day of election of councillors in 2011. Interpretation 2. In this Order— “ordinary day of election of councillors” has the meaning given by section 37 of the Representation of the People Act 1983(d); and “the 2007 Order” means the Tewkesbury (Parishes) Order 2007(e). (a) 1997 c.29.
    [Show full text]