DOCSLIB.ORG

Roles of Anger and Rumination in the Relationship Between Self-Compassion and Forgiveness

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Roles of Anger and Rumination in the Relationship Between Self-Compassion and Forgiveness Mindfulness (2019) 10:272–278 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-0971-7 ORIGINAL PAPER Roles of Anger and Rumination in the Relationship Between Self-Compassion and Forgiveness Qinglu Wu1 & Peilian Chi2 & Xianglong Zeng3 & Xiuyun Lin4 & Hongfei Du5,6 Published online: 23 June 2018 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Self-compassion can improve mental health and enable individuals to develop aspects of prosocial motivation such as forgiveness. Self-compassion is associated with forgiveness; however, cognitive and emotional mechanisms underlying this association remain underexplored. Based on Worthington’s stress-and-coping theory of forgiveness, we examined the roles of rumination and anger—two typical psychological responses to interpersonal transgressions—in the relationship between self-compassion and forgiveness. By analyzing a sample of 358 Chinese college students (132 male students, mean age = 19.18 years), we determined that self-compassion and forgiveness were negatively associated with anger and rumination. Structural equation modeling results revealed that self-compassion was associated with forgiveness directly and indirectly through decreased anger and rumination. Furthermore, rumination was associated with forgiveness indi- rectly through anger. These findings indicate that anger is a proximal predictor of forgiveness. The results of the present study suggest that increasing self-compassion, reducing rumination, and alleviating anger are substantial and interventive processes for cultivating forgiveness. Keywords Self-compassion . Anger . Rumination . Forgiveness Introduction the human experience, and embracing one’s own mind and feelings without judgment or avoidance (Fresnics and Borders Self-compassion is a construct that has attracted considerable 2017;Neff2003). Self-compassion is associated with a set of attention from psychologists over the past decade. Self- positive psychological constructs (e.g., self-esteem, self-deter- compassion is defined as a disposition for being with one’s mination, self-acceptance, and interpersonal trust) and in- own suffering, including being kind toward oneself, accepting versely associated with negative psychological constructs that suffering and negative experiences are a part of life and (e.g., anxiety, depression, and rumination) (Neff 2003; Qiu et al. 2017). Furthermore, self-compassion may be related to individual adaptive responses to life adversities including en- * Peilian Chi vironmental hardships and interpersonal challenges (Neff [email protected] 2003;NeffandPommier2013). Some empirical studies have consistently demonstrated that 1 Department of Social Work and Social Administration, Faculty of self-compassion is significantly associated with the tendency to Social Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, R712, 7/F, The forgive (Neff and Pommier 2013; Zhang and Chen 2016), which Jockey Club Tower, Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong 999077, China is a prosocial and adaptive response to environmental and inter- 2 Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of personal transgressions. People with high levels of self- Macau, Macau 999078, China compassion are more likely to exhibit kindness toward them- 3 School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China selves, understand transgressions as an inevitable aspect of the 4 Institute of Developmental Psychology, School of Psychology, human experience, and accept suffering caused by transgres- Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China sions. Thus, such people tend to be more forgiving toward others. 5 Department of Psychology, Guangzhou University, However, the underlying cognitive and emotional processes that Guangzhou, China explain how self-compassion is linked to forgiveness remain 6 Social and Health Psychology Research Center, Guangzhou unknown. Stress-and-coping theory of forgiveness has suggested University, Guangzhou, China Mindfulness (2019) 10:272–278 273 reductions in rumination and anger as crucial cognitive and emo- 2013). In mindfulness-based stress reduction and self- tional processes that predict forgiveness (Worthington 2006). compassion intervention studies, self-compassion has been Forgiveness is defined as a motivational transformation of found to be inversely associated with rumination and anger victims toward offenders, including reductions in negative (Robins et al. 2012;Smeetsetal.2014). emotions, thoughts, and behaviors toward offenders and in- Regarding the direction from rumination to anger, various creases in positive emotions, thoughts, and behaviors where perspectives have been offered. Most empirical studies have possible (Enright 1996;McCulloughetal.1998;Ripleyand reported that rumination is indirectly associated with forgive- Worthington 2002). Forgiveness is positively related to mental ness through anger (Bushman 2002; Ray et al. 2008). health (e.g., reductions in depression, anxiety, and hostility) and However, a few studies have reported contrary findings, dem- wellbeing (Miller and Worthington 2010; Worthington 2006). onstrating that anger enhances an individual’s level of rumi- Individuals with high levels of forgiveness are less likely to feel nation, particularly anger rumination, which is one type of depressed or anxious. Moreover, forgiveness not only benefits rumination that emerges during or after an experience of anger individuals but also helps people to handle conflict and main- (Besharat et al. 2013; Besharat and Pourbohlool 2012). Thus, tain relationships (Kachadourian et al. 2004; Wieselquist 2009). in this study, we (1) examined the cognitive pathway (through People with a high tendency to forgive others in daily life are decreased rumination) and emotional pathway (through de- more likely to empathize with others, express kindness, and creased anger) in the association between self-compassion realize the common imperfections of human beings (for and forgiveness; (2) explored what the proximate factor is review, see Fincham et al. 2006; Paleari et al. 2005). In marital for explaining tendencies for forgiveness through testing com- relationships, forgiveness toward a spouse is positively associ- petitive hypotheses regarding indirect effects, namely self- ated with both the individual and his or her spouse’s level of compassion → rumination → anger → forgiveness and self- marital satisfaction (David and Stafford 2015). compassion → anger → rumination → forgiveness. Self-compassion is generally related to prosocial responses (e.g., empathetic concern, perspective-taking, and altruism) (Neff and Pommier 2013; Zhang and Chen 2016). It has been Method shown to be associated with both of self-compassion and for- giveness (Neff and Pommier 2013; Zhang and Chen 2016). Participants People with higher levels of self-compassion are more likely to forgive those who have offended them, regardless of wheth- Study data were obtained from a research project investigating er the offender critically or compassionately evaluates him or the influence of childhood maltreatment on adulthood rela- herself after the transgressions (Allen et al. 2015). Self- tionship quality. Students at the University of Macau, all aged compassion is significantly associated with forgiveness to- 18 years or older and able to read Chinese, were potential ward others across populations (Neff and Pommier 2013). participants for this study. Eventually, 413 undergraduate stu- However, the mechanism underlying the relationship be- dents of the university participated by completing an issued tween self-compassion and forgiveness toward others should questionnaire. We excluded participants who were younger be investigated. According to the stress and coping theory of than 18 years; could not understand Chinese; or provided forgiveness, transgressions may be interpersonal stressors that duplicated responses (submissions made using a single partic- force victims to perceive a sense of injustice that might leave ipant ID twice or more), incomplete responses, or complete them feeling further threatened because of their suffering and responses within 5 min (Antonelli et al. 2014; Zhou et al. loss (Worthington 2006). The feeling of being threatened can 2013). Ultimately, 358 participants were included, comprising lead to rumination and anger. When victims ruminate over 132 male students and 226 female students, all aged 18– hurtful events, they re-experience and immerse themselves 34 years (mean = 19.18; standard deviation = 1.46). in associated negative thoughts and adverse emotions, and this renders them less likely to forgive. In cross-sectional and lon- Procedure gitudinal studies, rumination and anger have been negatively associated with forgiveness (Fatfouta et al. 2015; Lucas et al. An online questionnaire was administered. Before responding 2010; McCullough et al. 2007). to the questionnaire, an embedded informed consent form People with higher levels of self-compassion have been with general information regarding the project was provided observed as less likely to exhibit anger or aggression and less to all participating students. The students were informed of the ruminative in daily life (Fresnics and Borders 2017;Svendsen purpose, procedure, potential risks, confidentiality concerns, et al. 2016). Self-compassion enables people to understand and compensation method of the project, as well as their right their suffering from a broad and transcending perspective; this to withdraw from the project and the researchers’ contact in- enables people
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Anger Management Techniques
    Anger Management Techniques 1. Drain the Brain WHEN to use: When your temper begins to flare. WHAT does it do: Mentally challenge yourself before taking out your anger on others HOW? Ask yourself these questions: o WHAT is the source of my irritation? o WHAT is the degree of my anger? o WHAT is the other person’s actual role in the situation? . Turn the circumstances around to see how you would want to be treated if the other person felt as you do. These mental gymnastics can help you regain control over runaway emotions before they escape and cause external damage. 2. Walk It Off WHEN to use: o In those moments when you feel the familiar rage start to rumble, excuse yourself if others are present and take a quick walk down the hall or outdoors, depending on whether you are at home or at work, and the weather conditions. o Even a 5-10 minute stroll, especially one that is fast- paced, will help to cool your irritation as you practice the fight-or-flight strategy by escaping the potential conflict, which is one of the more popular and useful anger management techniques. Anger Management Techniques 1.Count to 20 before saying anything. 2.Leave the room for several minutes, or hours, if necessary, before discussing sensitive issues that may provoke your anger. 3.Write out a response to a problem before tackling it orally or in debate. This will give you time to think about the best approach to a problem rather than responding with random anger.
    [Show full text]
  • Emotional Intelligence: Empathy & Compassion
    Race, Mindfulness & Wise Action: A Focused Awareness & Emotionally Intelligent Approach to the Practice of Law, Attorney Presence & Well-Being A mindful series for the Twin Cities Diversity In Practice Community Mindfulness “Mindfulness is paying attention to what’s happening in the present moment, in the mind, body and external environment, with an Emotional Context Matters - attitude of kindness and curiosity.” Intelligence: Elevating awareness - Mindful Nation UK Report Emotional Intelligence Three levels of awareness: consists of 4 key skills Unconscious Bias (Dr. Daniel Goleman): • Awareness of Self • Awareness of Others ... is social stereotypes about certain 1. Self-Awareness • Awareness of Surroundings 2. Self-Management groups of people that individuals form 3. Social Awareness outside their own conscious awareness. 4. Relationship Management Everyone holds unconscious beliefs about various social and identity groups, and these biases stem from one’s tendency to organize social worlds by categorizing. Decision-Making Empathy & - University of Califoria, San Francisco & Behavior: Compassion - Emotions are complex. They Disrupting Bias: Body Map show show up as Understand where physiological sensations in The ability to experience and emotions show up in the body in connection with understand what others feel your body and how complex network of activity while maintaining a clear they feel (e.g, in the brain. Increasing discernment about your own tingling, tightness, emotional awareness can and the other person’s openness, heat, help improve decision- feelings and perspectives. neutral, etc.). making and behavior. (Dr. Checking in with the Nummenmaa , Dr. Bechara Compassion is empathy in body periodically and Dr. Lisa Feldman action, adding to the helps enhance self- Barrett.) definition of empathy the awareness, decision- question, "what will truly making and behavior © 2020 Lucenscia LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • About Emotions There Are 8 Primary Emotions. You Are Born with These
    About Emotions There are 8 primary emotions. You are born with these emotions wired into your brain. That wiring causes your body to react in certain ways and for you to have certain urges when the emotion arises. Here is a list of primary emotions: Eight Primary Emotions Anger: fury, outrage, wrath, irritability, hostility, resentment and violence. Sadness: grief, sorrow, gloom, melancholy, despair, loneliness, and depression. Fear: anxiety, apprehension, nervousness, dread, fright, and panic. Joy: enjoyment, happiness, relief, bliss, delight, pride, thrill, and ecstasy. Interest: acceptance, friendliness, trust, kindness, affection, love, and devotion. Surprise: shock, astonishment, amazement, astound, and wonder. Disgust: contempt, disdain, scorn, aversion, distaste, and revulsion. Shame: guilt, embarrassment, chagrin, remorse, regret, and contrition. All other emotions are made up by combining these basic 8 emotions. Sometimes we have secondary emotions, an emotional reaction to an emotion. We learn these. Some examples of these are: o Feeling shame when you get angry. o Feeling angry when you have a shame response (e.g., hurt feelings). o Feeling fear when you get angry (maybe you’ve been punished for anger). There are many more. These are NOT wired into our bodies and brains, but are learned from our families, our culture, and others. When you have a secondary emotion, the key is to figure out what the primary emotion, the feeling at the root of your reaction is, so that you can take an action that is most helpful. .
    [Show full text]
  • Anger, Murder, Adultery and Lust!
    Mind Blown Lesson 2: Anger, Murder, Adultery and Lust! [Reader: group leader] We’re in the second lesson of a series on the Sermon on the ​ ​ Mount (Matthew 5, 6 and 7). Jesus was the preacher of that sermon, and He said some pretty mind-blowing things. In the first study we read how Jesus said the whole Old Testament centered around Him. Imagine some preacher telling you that in this day and age. Your reaction might be something like that of the kids in this video whose parent hadn’t told them the identity of Darth Vader. Watch Mind=Blown Star Wars Video In this lesson, we’ll see what Jesus has to say about murder, anger, adultery and lust. Hint: It’s not just going to be mind-blowing; it’s going to be completely counter-cultural! But first, let’s be a little counter-cultural ourselves and open in prayer. [Leader prays.] Part 1: MURDER, HATRED, REVENGE AND ANGER [Reader: person with the longest hair)] ​ ​ Here’s what Jesus’ had to say about murder in the Sermon on the Mount: “You have heard that our ancestors were told, ‘You must not murder. If you commit murder, you are subject to judgment.’ But I say, if you are even angry with someone, you are subject to judgment! If you call someone an idiot, you are in danger of being brought before the court. And if you curse someone, you are in danger of the fires of hell. So if you are presenting a sacrifice at the alter in the Temple and you suddenly remember that someone has something against you, leave your sacrifice there at the alter.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Compassion and Connection in the Work Place
    16Journal of Systemic Therapies, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2006, pp. 16–36 O’Brien CREATING COMPASSION AND CONNECTION IN THE WORK PLACE PETER J. O’BRIEN, M.S.W. Foothills Medical Centre This article raises questions about what contributes to creating a com- passionate work environment and sustaining connections that are meaningful in relation to clients and colleagues. Concepts including burnout, compassion fatigue, vicarious traumatization and counter- transference are examined, with attention to how they complicate the establishment of a compassionate work place. Factors are discussed which further influence the work environment and inhibit the creation of the desired culture. Individual and institutional steps are then sug- gested that can be taken to establish a preferred work environment. In particular, practices are considered within the workplace that com- bat some of the undesirable symptoms, or that lead to the acknowl- edgment of contributions to a healthy environment and which foster human connections. As I enjoyed a concert by the 60’s band the Turtles, I was struck by the sense of connection and joy communicated throughout the concert by the two lead singers. I wondered what factors contributed to their apprecia- tion for one another and what meaning they attach to their life work, span- ning some forty years of collaboration. The purpose of this paper is to first raise questions about what contrib- utes to creating a compassionate work environment and sustaining con- nections that are meaningful in the mental health context. A case example will illustrate some of the common challenges in health care. Then, an examination of factors in our culture and our work settings that compli- Address correspondence to Peter O’Brien, M.S.W.
    [Show full text]
  • How Compassion Became Painful
    Journal of Buddhist Studies, Vol. XIV, 2017 (Of-print) How Compassion Became Painful Bhikkhu AnālAyo Published by Centre for Buddhist Studies, Sri Lanka & The Buddha-Dharma Centre of Hong Kong EDITORIAL CONSULTANTS Ratna Handurukande Ph.D. Professor Emeritus, University of Peradeniya. Y karunadasa Ph.D. Professor Emeritus, University of Kelaniya Visiting Professor, The Buddha-Dharma Centre of Hong Kong. Oliver abeynayake Ph.D. Professor Emeritus, Buddhist and Pali University of Sri Lanka. Chandima Wijebandara Ph.D. Professor, University of Sri Jayawardhanapura. Sumanapala GalmanGoda Ph.D. Professor, University of Kelaniya. Academic Coordinator, Nāgānanda International Institute of Buddhist Studies, Sri Lanka. Toshiichi endo Ph.D. Associate Professor, Centre of Buddhist Studies The University of Hong Kong EDITOR Bhikkhu KL dHammajoti 法光 Director, The Buddha-Dharma Centre of Hong Kong. Chair Professor, School of Philosophy, Renmin University of China. CONTENTS Ānisaṃsa: Merit, Motivation and Material Culture 1 Peter Skilling The Buddha’s Eighteen Qualities (aṭṭhārasabuddhadhammā): The Pāli Commentarial Exposition 57 Toshiichi Endo How Compassion Became Painful 85 Bhikkhu AnālAyo Punabbhava and Jātisaṃsāra in Early Buddhism 115 G.A. SomaratnE Ancient and Modern Interpretations of the Pañcavimuttāyatana 139 Bhikkhu PāsādikA Trials and Tribulations in the Study of the Cult of Maitreya in Theravāda Buddhism 151 Dragomir dimitrov The Bāmiyān Prātimokṣasūtra: a “Buddhist Hybrid Text” 183 Bhikkhu ÑāṇAtusitA Mahāsāṅghika and Mahāyāna: Further Notes 227 Charles WillEmEn Yogācāra Refutation of Tritemporal Existence 235 KL dhammajoti AnālAyo: How Compassion Became Painful How Compassion Became Painful AnālAyo Introduction In this paper I explore how the cultivation of compassion, karuṇā, developed from involving a potentially joyful experience in early Buddhist thought to taking on a more painful tonality in later times.
    [Show full text]
  • Mindfulness and Compassion – from a Neuroscience Point of View
    Mindfulness and Compassion – from a neuroscience point of view Dr. Tamara Russell In the last decade there has been a growth of empirical evidence to support mindfulness- based approaches in the mental health setting (Williams & Kuyken, 2012). Following on from the success of the Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) program to help those with chronic physical health ailments (Grossman et al., 2004), the Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) protocol has been developed and evaluated in individuals with major depressive disorder (Williams & Kuyken, 2012). This protocol seems to be particularly helpful for those with recurrent depression who also have experience of childhood trauma (Williams et al., 2014). The MBCT protocol, with adaptations, has been tried with many other mental health clinical populations, with promising results from these early feasibility and acceptability studies (Hoffman et al., 2010). There is also a suggestion that this training is of benefit to staff (Shapiro et al, 2007) in a way that may secondarily benefit patients (Grepmair et al., 2007). Within the mindfulness training protocol, participants are encouraged to engage with mental and physical experience on a moment-by-moment basis. This requires attention training, as the mind typically wanders onto other things and especially so when emotions run high. Learning to tolerate emotions, spot mental habits of attachment and avoidance and learning to inhibit chains of thinking and train attention are the key tasks in mindfulness training. These processes recruit a network of brain regions related to attention (including the anterior cingulate cortex and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex), body awareness (somatosensory cortex, motor and pre-motor cortex) and emotion regulation (right anterior insula and limbic structures including the amygdala; Holzel et al., 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Why Don't People Act Collectively: the Role of Group Anger, Group Efficacy
    Efficacy, Anger, Fear and Collective Action Running Head: EFFICACY, ANGER, FEAR, AND COLLECTIVE ACTION The Relative Impact of Anger and Efficacy on Collective Action is Affected by Feelings of Fear Daniel A. Miller Tracey Cronin Indiana University – Purdue University, Fort Wayne University of Kansas Amber L. Garcia Nyla R. Branscombe The College of Wooster University of Kansas KEY WORDS: Collective action, emotion, group efficacy, fear, anger, suppression WORD COUNT: 9,005 words excluding references, tables, figures and title page Author’s Note: We are grateful to Matthew Hornsey for his helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. Address correspondence to Daniel A. Miller, Indiana University - Purdue University, Fort Wayne, Department of Psychology, 2101E Coliseum Blvd., Fort Wayne , IN 46805; e-mail: [email protected] Efficacy, Anger, Fear and Collective Action Abstract Two well established predictors of collective action are perceptions of group efficacy and feelings of anger. The current research investigates the extent to which the relative impact of these variables differs when fear is or is not also included as a predictor of collective action. The results of two experiments indicate that when fear is not assessed, the importance of anger as a predictor of action is underestimated while the importance of group efficacy is overestimated. The results further indicate that fear, in addition to affecting the impact of known causes of collective action (anger and group efficacy), is a powerful inhibitor of collective action. The implications for current theoretical models of collective action instigators are discussed. Efficacy, Anger, Fear and Collective Action The Relative Impact of Anger and Efficacy on Collective Action is Affected by Feelings of Fear oderint dum metuant: Let them hate so long as they fear.
    [Show full text]
  • Moral Emotions As Determinants of Third-Party Punishment: Anger, Guilt, and the Functions of Altruistic Sanctions
    Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 4, No. 7, December 2009, pp. 543–553 Moral emotions as determinants of third-party punishment: Anger, guilt, and the functions of altruistic sanctions Rob M. A. Nelissen∗ and Marcel Zeelenberg Tilburg University, the Netherlands Abstract Third-party punishment has recently received attention as an explanation for human altruism. Feelings of anger in response to norm violations are assumed to motivate third-party sanctions, yet there is only sparse and indirect support for this idea. We investigated the impact of both anger and guilt feelings on third-party sanctions. In two studies both emotions were independently manipulated. Results show that anger and guilt independently constitute sufficient but not necessary causes of punishment. Low levels of punishment are observed only when neither emotion is elicited. We discuss the implications of these findings for the functions of altruistic sanctions. Keywords: third-party punishment, social norms, emotions, decision-making. 1 Introduction own (Haidt, 2003). We experience feelings like empathy, anger, and guilt if we consider how others have been hurt, People often defend the interests of others. They stand wronged, or harmed (e.g., Batson, 2006; Haidt, 2003). up for their friends if someone speaks ill about them in The view that moral emotions also have functional behav- their absence. They do not tolerate a colleague being bul- ioral consequences is reflected in evolutionary hypothe- lied at work. They boycott consumer products that are sis about their adaptive value (e.g., Tooby & Cosmides, produced using child labor. Some even come to the aid 1990; Trivers, 1971). of a stranger who is being physically harassed, in spite Especially Robert Frank’s (2004) notion of emotions of obvious personal danger.
    [Show full text]
  • Vulnerability, Empathy,And Compassion and Your Team During a Time of Change
    Vulnerability, Empathy,and Compassion and Your Team during a Time of Change healthy.iu.edu Objectives for this Lesson • To establish a foundation of what empathy, compassion, and vulnerability are. • To learn the benefits of infusing these 3 qualities into your team. • To develop a toolkit for how to build a team culture based in empathy, compassion, and vulnerability. healthy.iu.edu Vulnerability • Normalizing weaknesses and limitations • Asking for help is expected and welcomed • Permission to admit insecurities in order to face them and build trust Coyle, D. (2018). The Culture Code: The Secrets of Highly Successful Groups. Bantam Books: New York, New York. healthy.iu.edu The Vulnerability Loop at Work • Person A sends a signal of vulnerability. • Person B detects this signal. • Person B responds by signaling their own vulnerability. • Person A detects this signal. • A norm is established; closeness and trust increase. Coyle, D. (2018). The Culture Code: The Secrets of Highly Successful Groups. Bantam Books: New York, New York. healthy.iu.edu Benefits of Vulnerability • Increased trust • Problem-solving environment • Cooperation a well developed muscle Coyle, D. (2018). The Culture Code: The Secrets of Highly Successful Groups. Bantam Books: New York, New York. healthy.iu.edu What is Empathy? Empathy occurs when one person vicariously experiences the feelings, perceptions, and thoughts of another Mortier, A. V., Vlerick, P., & Clays, E. (2016). Authentic leadership and thriving among nurses: The mediating role of empathy. Journal of Nursing Management, 24, 357–365. healthy.iu.edu What Empathy gets confused with... Sympathy • Feeling sorry for someone; not feeling with someone Redirection to avoid discomfort • “Look on the bright side…” • “At least you don’t…” The reflex to “fix it” • Rarely does a response make things better.
    [Show full text]
  • Compassion & Forgiveness
    Compassion & Forgiveness in The Great Gatsby The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have enough memory to open the image, or the image may have been corrupted. Restart your computer, and then open the file again. If the red x still appears, you may have to delete the image and then insert it again. Compassion & Forgiveness Ø Characters possess an infinite capacity to forgive. Ø Characters possess an infinite stubbornness not to forgive. Compassion & Forgiveness Ø Example: Daisy’s marriage vs. her love Compassion & Forgiveness Ø Examples: Tom’s cheating vs. Gatsby’s deceit Compassion & Forgiveness Ø Cause of much sadness in the novel Ø Characters taunted by the possibility of forgiveness only to lose out to another’s stubbornness. THESIS In The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald, the author illustrates the power of forgiveness to heal when offered and to destroy when denied. Question #1 What gets forgiven and what does not get forgiven in this novel? Why? Characters offer a limited forgiveness for actions. The limit to forgiveness occurs when perception fails to match reality. Evidence #1 Characters offer a limited forgiveness for actions. The limit to forgiveness occurs when perception fails to match reality. Gatsby began “denying everything, defending his name” but Daisy drew “further and further into herself.” Gatsby’s dream died but “fought on... struggling toward that lost voice,” the Daisy of his past. Question #2 Nick claims in the first page of the novel that he was told to never criticize. Is he compassionate towards Gatsby, or does he judge the man? Does this evolve over the course of the novel? In the beginning of the novel, Nick judges Gatsby harshly; however, his feelings evolve to include an enormous measure of compassion for Gatsby.
    [Show full text]
  • Angry Rumination Mediates the Unique Associations Between Self-Compassion and Anger and Aggression
    Mindfulness DOI 10.1007/s12671-016-0629-2 ORIGINAL PAPER Angry Rumination Mediates the Unique Associations Between Self-Compassion and Anger and Aggression Amanda Fresnics1 & Ashley Borders1 # Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016 Abstract Mindfulness is known to decrease anger and ag- be useful for developing clinical interventions targeting anger gression. Self-compassion is a related and relatively new con- and aggressive behavior. struct that may predict other clinical outcomes more strongly than does mindfulness. Little research has focused on whether Keywords Self-compassion . Mindfulness . Angry self-compassion is related to anger and aggression, and no rumination . Anger . Aggression studies have explored mechanisms of these associations. The current survey study explores whether angry rumination me- diates the unique associations between self-compassion and Introduction anger and aggression, controlling for trait mindfulness. Two hundred and one undergraduates completed questionnaires Mindfulness has known benefits for individuals with anger and assessing self-compassion, mindfulness, angry rumination, aggression problems (Heppner et al. 2008). Self-compassion is and recent anger and aggression. Supporting our hypotheses, a related construct that has received recent empirical attention angry rumination mediated the associations between self- because of its potential to reduce suffering. This positive attri- compassion—particularly its over-identification subscale— bute consists of extending a loving, non-judgmental attitude
    [Show full text]