DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix N Archaeological Resource Report for the San Dieguito Lagoon W-19 Restoration Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix N Archaeological Resource Report for the San Dieguito Lagoon W-19 Restoration Project APPENDIX N ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCE REPORT FOR THE SAN DIEGUITO LAGOON W-19 RESTORATION PROJECT San Dieguito Lagoon W-19 Restoration Project Draft EIR Appendices March 2017 ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCE REPORT FOR THE SAN DIEGUITO LAGOON W-19 RESTORATION PROJECT SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted to: San Dieguito River Park Joint Powers Authority 18372 Sycamore Creek Road Escondido, CA 92025 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles District Regulatory Division, Carlsbad Field Office 5900 La Place Court, Suite 100 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Submitted by: AECOM 401 West A Street, Suite 1200 San Diego, CA 92101 ___________________________________________ Patrick McGinnis, M.A., RPA, Archaeologist Rachel Droessler, B.S., Archaeologist Restricted Distribution – Confidential Information Area Surveyed: 172.5 acres USGS Quadrangle: 7.5' Del Mar Cultural Resources: CA-SDI-7291, CA-SDI-7293, CA-SDI-10118, CA-SDI-10535, CA-SDI-20032, P-37-014760, P-37-014761, P-37-014764, P-37-014765, P-37-031577, CA-SDI-21796 April 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 Project Description and Location ........................................................................................ 1 SETTING ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Natural Environment ........................................................................................................... 3 Paleoenvironmental Setting .................................................................................... 3 Existing Natural Setting .......................................................................................... 4 Ethnography/History ........................................................................................................... 5 Prehistoric Period .................................................................................................... 5 Ethnohistoric Period................................................................................................ 6 Historic Period ........................................................................................................ 7 AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS ............................................................................................. 11 STUDY METHODS ..................................................................................................................... 13 RESULTS OF STUDY ................................................................................................................. 15 Background Research ....................................................................................................... 15 Previous Investigations ......................................................................................... 15 Previously Recorded Archaeological Properties .................................................. 23 CA-SDI-7291 ........................................................................................................ 28 CA-SDI-7293 ........................................................................................................ 28 CA-SDI-10118 ...................................................................................................... 28 CA-SDI-10535 ...................................................................................................... 28 CA-SDI-20032 ...................................................................................................... 28 P-37-014760 .......................................................................................................... 29 P-37-014761 .......................................................................................................... 29 P-37-014764 .......................................................................................................... 29 P-37-014765 .......................................................................................................... 29 P-37-031577 .......................................................................................................... 29 Native American Contact Program ................................................................................... 29 Field Reconnaissance ........................................................................................................ 29 CA-SDI-21796 ...................................................................................................... 30 CA-SDI-7291 ........................................................................................................ 31 CA-SDI-7293 ........................................................................................................ 31 CA-SDI-10118 ...................................................................................................... 31 CA-SDI-10535 ...................................................................................................... 32 CA-SDI-20032 ...................................................................................................... 32 P-37-014760 .......................................................................................................... 32 P-37-014761 .......................................................................................................... 33 P-37-014764 .......................................................................................................... 33 W-19 Archaeological Resource Report Page i 60274999 San Dieguito Lagoon ARR.doc 4/27/2016 P-37-014765 .......................................................................................................... 33 P-37-031577 .......................................................................................................... 33 Evaluation ......................................................................................................................... 33 RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................................. 39 ATTACHMENTS A National Archaeological Data Base Information B Bibliography C Maps D Photographs E Personnel Qualifications CONFIDENTIAL APPENDICES (Bound Separately) A Records Search Results B Historical Resource Location Maps and Site Maps C New and Updated Historical Resource Records LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1 Previous Investigations Conducted within a 1-Mile Radius of the Project Area ................. 16 2 Previously Recorded Archaeological Properties within a 1-Mile Radius of the Project Area .......................................................................................................................... 23 3 Cultural Resources within the Proposed APE ...................................................................... 30 Page ii W-19 Archaeological Resource Report 60274999 San Dieguito Lagoon ARR.doc 4/27/2016 INTRODUCTION PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION San Dieguito Lagoon is located within the San Dieguito River Valley in the City of San Diego, San Diego County, California (Attachment A and B contain report and bibliographic information). The San Dieguito Lagoon W-19 Restoration Project (proposed project) would be located within San Dieguito Lagoon, east of lnterstate 5 (I-5), south of County Highway S6, and west of El Camino Real (Figure 1 and 2; figures are attached to this report as Attachment C). The proposed project site (W-19) is located within lands owned by the San Dieguito River Park Joint Power Authority (JPA), California Department of Fish and Wildlife, the 22nd Agricultural District, and the City of San Diego, and is within the Focused Planning Area of the San Dieguito River Park. The proposed project would restore approximately 141 acres to a functional mix of tidal salt marsh, brackish marsh, and transitional/upland habitats (Figures 3 and 4; Attachment C). Tidal salt marsh habitat would be created west of the existing utility corridor and brackish marsh habitat east of the utility corridor. Upland/transitional habitats would be placed adjacent to wetland habitat to support the ecological function of the restoration project. An existing utility corridor would be enhanced (e.g., through planting with transitional habitat consisting of low- growing, native species that would be maintained by San Diego Gas & Electric) as part of the proposed project. Approximately 60 acres of tidal salt marsh would be created west of the existing utility corridor and south of the San Dieguito River. Tidal connection with the river would be constructed at the west end of the project site in the vicinity of the existing least tern nesting island. An upland terrace berm planted with a mix of transitional and upland habitat would be constructed between the salt marsh and the San Dieguito River channel to protect the wetlands from damage due to flood and sedimentation, and to maintain sand movement through the river channel. Protection from erosion within the site would be provided along the utility corridor as well as at the outlet of the existing stormwater culvert extending under El Camino Real. East of the existing utility corridor, approximately 15 acres of brackish marsh would be created as part of the proposed project. An open water channel from the San Dieguito River would be constructed through the brackish marsh area. Similar to the salt marsh area, an upland terrace berm planted with coastal sage scrub would be constructed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE EXPLORERS by Richard F. Pourade CHAPTER ONE: BEFORE
    THE EXPLORERS By Richard F. Pourade CHAPTER ONE: BEFORE THE EXPLORERS San Diego was a well populated area before the first Spanish explorers arrived. The climate was wetter and perhaps warmer, and the land more wooded than now. The remnant of a great inland lake covered most of Imperial Valley. The San Diego River wandered back and forth over the broad delta it had formed between Point Loma and Old Town, alternately emptying into Mission Bay and San Diego Bay. The natural food supply was so abundant that the state as a whole supported an Indian population far greater than any equal area in the United States. The native population of the southern counties alone must have been at least 10,000. The early maps made of San Diego Bay by the Spanish explorers show the same general configuration as of today, except, of course, for the many changes in the shoreline made by dredging and filling in recent years. The maps, crudely drawn without proper surveys, vary considerably in detail. Thousands of years ago, in the late part of the Ice Age, Point Loma was an island, as were Coronado and North Island. Coronado used to be known as South Island. There was no bay, as we think of it now. A slightly curving coastline was protected by the three islands, of which, of course, Point Loma was by far the largest. What we now know as Crown Point in Mission Bay was a small peninsula projecting into the ocean. On the mainland, the San Diego and Linda Vista mesas were one continuous land mass.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ENVIRONMENTAL LEGACY of the UC NATURAL RESERVE SYSTEM This Page Intentionally Left Blank the Environmental Legacy of the Uc Natural Reserve System
    THE ENVIRONMENTAL LEGACY OF THE UC NATURAL RESERVE SYSTEM This page intentionally left blank the environmental legacy of the uc natural reserve system edited by peggy l. fiedler, susan gee rumsey, and kathleen m. wong university of california press Berkeley Los Angeles London The publisher gratefully acknowledges the generous contri- bution to this book provided by the University of California Natural Reserve System. University of California Press, one of the most distinguished university presses in the United States, enriches lives around the world by advancing scholarship in the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences. Its activities are supported by the UC Press Foundation and by philanthropic contributions from individuals and institutions. For more information, visit www.ucpress.edu. University of California Press Berkeley and Los Angeles, California University of California Press, Ltd. London, England © 2013 by The Regents of the University of California Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The environmental legacy of the UC natural reserve system / edited by Peggy L. Fiedler, Susan Gee Rumsey, and Kathleen M. Wong. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-520-27200-2 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Natural areas—California. 2. University of California Natural Reserve System—History. 3. University of California (System)—Faculty. 4. Environmental protection—California. 5. Ecology—Study and teaching— California. 6. Natural history—Study and teaching—California. I. Fiedler, Peggy Lee. II. Rumsey, Susan Gee. III. Wong, Kathleen M. (Kathleen Michelle) QH76.5.C2E59 2013 333.73'1609794—dc23 2012014651 Manufactured in China 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (R 2002) (Permanence of Paper).
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment B-4 San Diego RWQCB Basin Plan Beneficial Uses
    Attachment B-4 San Diego RWQCB Basin Plan Beneficial Uses Regulatory_Issues_Trends.doc CHAPTER 2 BENEFICIAL USES INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................1 BENEFICIAL USES ..........................................................................................................................1 BENEFICIAL USE DESIGNATION UNDER THE PORTER-COLOGNE WATER QUALITY CONTROL ACT ..1 BENEFICIAL USE DESIGNATION UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT .................................................2 BENEFICIAL USE DEFINITIONS.........................................................................................................3 EXISTING AND POTENTIAL BENEFICIAL USES ..................................................................................7 BENEFICIAL USES FOR SPECIFIC WATER BODIES ........................................................................8 DESIGNATION OF RARE BENEFICIAL USE ...................................................................................8 DESIGNATION OF COLD FRESHWATER HABITAT BENEFICIAL USE ...............................................9 DESIGNATION OF SPAWNING, REPRODUCTION, AND/ OR EARLY DEVELOPMENT (SPWN) BENEFICIAL USE ...................................................................................................11 SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER POLICY ..................................................................................11 EXCEPTIONS TO THE "SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER" POLICY................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • UC San Diego Capstone Papers
    UC San Diego Capstone Papers Title Developing a Draft Management Plan for the Dike Rock Intertidal Area Scripps Coastal Reserve, La Jolla, California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4c57b1bc Author Som, Marina Publication Date 2015-04-01 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California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
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Resources Report for the Edgington Oxnard Refinery, Oxnard, Ventura County, California
    Phase I Historic Resources Report for the Edgington Oxnard Refinery, Oxnard, Ventura County, California December 2020 Prepared for: California Resources Corporation Prepared by: Laura Taylor Kung, M.A. Shannon Davis, M.A., RPH 2034 Corte del Nogal Carlsbad, California 92011 (760) 804-5757 ASM Project Number 28101.04 Phase I Historic Resources Report for the Edgington Oxnard Refinery, Oxnard, Ventura County, California Prepared for: California Resources Corporation Prepared by: Laura Taylor Kung, M.A. Shannon Davis, M.A., RPH ASM Affiliates, Inc. 2034 Corte del Nogal Carlsbad, California 92011 December 2020 PN 28101.04 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................ iii 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 1 SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................... 1 Survey Area ............................................................................................................... 2 Field Methods ............................................................................................................ 2 Research Methods ..................................................................................................... 2 Key Personnel ........................................................................................................... 3 2.0 HISTORIC CONTEXT ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Portolá Trail and Development of Foster City Our Vision Table of Contents to Discover the Past and Imagine the Future
    Winter 2014-2015 LaThe Journal of the SanPeninsula Mateo County Historical Association, Volume xliii, No. 1 Portolá Trail and Development of Foster City Our Vision Table of Contents To discover the past and imagine the future. Is it Time for a Portolá Trail Designation in San Mateo County? ....................... 3 by Paul O. Reimer, P.E. Our Mission Development of Foster City: A Photo Essay .................................................... 15 To enrich, excite and by T. Jack Foster, Jr. educate through understanding, preserving The San Mateo County Historical Association Board of Directors and interpreting the history Paul Barulich, Chairman; Barbara Pierce, Vice Chairwoman; Shawn DeLuna, Secretary; of San Mateo County. Dee Tolles, Treasurer; Thomas Ames; Alpio Barbara; Keith Bautista; Sandra McLellan Behling; John Blake; Elaine Breeze; David Canepa; Tracy De Leuw; Dee Eva; Ted Everett; Accredited Pat Hawkins; Mark Jamison; Peggy Bort Jones; Doug Keyston; John LaTorra; Joan by the American Alliance Levy; Emmet W. MacCorkle; Karen S. McCown; Nick Marikian; Olivia Garcia Martinez; Gene Mullin; Bob Oyster; Patrick Ryan; Paul Shepherd; John Shroyer; Bill Stronck; of Museums. Joseph Welch III; Shawn White and Mitchell P. Postel, President. President’s Advisory Board Albert A. Acena; Arthur H. Bredenbeck; John Clinton; Robert M. Desky; T. Jack Foster, The San Mateo County Jr.; Umang Gupta; Greg Munks; Phill Raiser; Cynthia L. Schreurs and John Schrup. Historical Association Leadership Council operates the San Mateo John C. Adams, Wells Fargo; Jenny Johnson, Franklin Templeton Investments; Barry County History Museum Jolette, San Mateo Credit Union and Paul Shepherd, Cargill. and Archives at the old San Mateo County Courthouse La Peninsula located in Redwood City, Carmen J.
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Summaries
    Appendix A: Watershed Summaries Preface California’s watersheds supply water for drinking, recreation, industry, and farming and at the same time provide critical habitat for a wide variety of animal species. Conceptually, a watershed is any sloping surface that sheds water, such as a creek, lake, slough or estuary. In southern California, rapid population growth in watersheds has led to increased conflict between human users of natural resources, dramatic loss of native diversity, and a general decline in the health of ecosystems. California ranks second in the country in the number of listed endangered and threatened aquatic species. This Appendix is a “working” database that can be supplemented in the future. It provides a brief overview of information on the major hydrological units of the South Coast, and draws from the following primary sources: • The California Rivers Assessment (CARA) database (http://www.ice.ucdavis.edu/newcara) provides information on large-scale watershed and river basin statistics; • Information on the creeks and watersheds for the ESU of the endangered southern steelhead trout from the National Marine Fisheries Service (http://swr.ucsd.edu/hcd/SoCalDistrib.htm); • Watershed Plans from the Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB) that provide summaries of existing hydrological units for each subregion of the south coast (http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcbs/index.html); • General information on the ecology of the rivers and watersheds of the south coast described in California’s Rivers and Streams: Working
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Steelhead Populations Are in Danger of Extinction Within the Next 25-50 Years, Due to Anthropogenic and Environmental Impacts That Threaten Recovery
    SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA STEELHEAD Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus Critical Concern. Status Score = 1.9 out of 5.0. Southern steelhead populations are in danger of extinction within the next 25-50 years, due to anthropogenic and environmental impacts that threaten recovery. Since its listing as an Endangered Species in 1997, southern steelhead abundance remains precariously low. Description: Southern steelhead are similar to other steelhead and are distinguished primarily by genetic and physiological differences that reflect their evolutionary history. They also exhibit morphometric differences that distinguish them from other coastal steelhead in California such as longer, more streamlined bodies that facilitate passage more easily in Southern California’s characteristic low flow, flashy streams (Bajjaliya et al. 2014). Taxonomic Relationships: Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) historically populated all coastal streams of Southern California with permanent flows, as either resident or anadromous trout, or both. Due to natural events such as fire and debris flows, and more recently due to anthropogenic forces such as urbanization and dam construction, many rainbow trout populations are isolated in remote headwaters of their native basins and exhibit a resident life history. In streams with access to the ocean, anadromous forms are present, which have a complex relationship with the resident forms (see Life History section). Southern California steelhead, or southern steelhead, is our informal name for the anadromous form of the formally designated Southern California Coast Steelhead Distinct Population Segment (DPS). Southern steelhead occurring below man-made or natural barriers were distinguished from resident trout in the Endangered Species Act (ESA) listing, and are under different jurisdictions for purposes of fisheries management although the two forms typically constitute one interbreeding population.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohlone-Portola Heritage Trail Statement of Significance
    State of California Natural Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # Trinomial CONTINUATION SHEET Property Name: __California Historical Landmarks Associated with the Ohlone-Portolá Heritage Trail______ Page __1___ of __36__ B10. Statement of Significance (continued): The following Statement of Significance establishes the common historic context for California Historical Landmarks associated with the October-November 1769 expedition of Gaspar de Portolá through what is now San Mateo County, as part of a larger expedition through the southern San Francisco Bay region, encountering different Ohlone communities, known as the Ohlone-Portolá Heritage Trail. This context establishes the significance of these landmark sites as California Historical Landmarks for their association with an individual having a profound influence on the history of California, Gaspar de Portolá, and a group having a profound influence on the history of California, the Ohlone people, both associated with the Portolá Expedition Camp at Expedition. This context amends seven California Historical Landmarks, and creates two new California Historical Landmark nominations. The Statement of Significance applies to the following California Historical Landmarks, updating their names and historic contexts. Each meets the requirements of California PRC 5024.1(2) regarding review of state historical landmarks preceding #770, and the criteria necessary for listing as California Historical Landmarks. Because these landmarks indicate sites with no extant
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Tribal Nations of San Diego County This Chapter Presents an Overall Summary of the Tribal Nations of San Diego County and the Water Resources on Their Reservations
    4 Tribal Nations of San Diego County This chapter presents an overall summary of the Tribal Nations of San Diego County and the water resources on their reservations. A brief description of each Tribe, along with a summary of available information on each Tribe’s water resources, is provided. The water management issues provided by the Tribe’s representatives at the San Diego IRWM outreach meetings are also presented. 4.1 Reservations San Diego County features the largest number of Tribes and Reservations of any county in the United States. There are 18 federally-recognized Tribal Nation Reservations and 17 Tribal Governments, because the Barona and Viejas Bands share joint-trust and administrative responsibility for the Capitan Grande Reservation. All of the Tribes within the San Diego IRWM Region are also recognized as California Native American Tribes. These Reservation lands, which are governed by Tribal Nations, total approximately 127,000 acres or 198 square miles. The locations of the Tribal Reservations are presented in Figure 4-1 and summarized in Table 4-1. Two additional Tribal Governments do not have federally recognized lands: 1) the San Luis Rey Band of Luiseño Indians (though the Band remains active in the San Diego region) and 2) the Mount Laguna Band of Luiseño Indians. Note that there may appear to be inconsistencies related to population sizes of tribes in Table 4-1. This is because not all Tribes may choose to participate in population surveys, or may identify with multiple heritages. 4.2 Cultural Groups Native Americans within the San Diego IRWM Region generally comprise four distinct cultural groups (Kumeyaay/Diegueno, Luiseño, Cahuilla, and Cupeño), which are from two distinct language families (Uto-Aztecan and Yuman-Cochimi).
    [Show full text]
  • UC Natural Reserve System Transect Publication 18:1
    University of California TransectS u m m e r 2 0 0 0 • Volume 18, No.1 A few words from the NRS systemwide office oday the NRS’s 33 reserve sites,* encompassing roughly T 130,000 acres, are protected and managed in support of teaching, research, and outreach activities. The only people who live there now are a handful of reserve personnel — mostly resident managers and stewards — who care for these wildlands, their resources and facilities, and who enable the teaching and research to continue across California. But this was not always the case. Long before even the concept of Cali- fornia, other people lived out their lives on these lands. Hundreds and thou- sands of years ago, other people were finding ways to feed, clothe, shelter, Photo by Susan Gee Rumsey and protect themselves, trying their The past is nonrenewable: Continued on page 32 Natural reserves protect rich cultural resources 4 Firsthand impressions of a Santa Cruz Island dig ’ve done research at the UC Natural Reserve System’s site on Santa Cruz Island for over 20 years, including archaeological field schools (10 summers) 7 Archaeology sheds light on and National Science Foundation-supported research (6 years) since 1985. I Big Creek mussel mystery I also did my Ph.D. on the island (1980-83) and recorded the major chert quar- 17 Of mammoths and men ries of El Montañon and the microblade production industries in the China Harbor area. 20 Picturing the past in the East Mojave Desert Santa Cruz Island is a remarkable place, and its pre-European cultural resources 25 And a useful glossary of are among the most important and exceptionally well-preserved in the United anthropology terms, too! States.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2005 Volume 11 Issue 12 Rancho
    December 2005 Volume 11 Issue 12 Rancho Simi Trail Blazers A Division of the Rancho Simi Foundation PEDRO FAGES’ DESCRIPTION OF CHUMASH DRESS HOLIDAY POTLUCK Mt. San Antonio Ski Hut December 3rd & 4th Last year's party was so much fun, Pedro Fages accompanied the Portola we're doing it again! expedition through the Santa Clara 6 MRT - Strenuous overnighter. (2,200' River Valley in 1769. His description This year, the elevation gain) of how the Chumash dress, rendered in Rancho Simi Trail Blazers Holiday 1775 to the Vicory, represents a time Potluck Party It doesn't get much better than this! The before outside influences had impacted the inhabitants of this area. His words, Hut is at the base of Mt. San Antonio (Mt. will be held on in translation: Baldy) at 8,200'. We'll only do 3 miles the Wednesday, December 14th first day and we have all day to do it. Coming back the next day is all down hill. from 6:30pm "The men go clothed with a large cloak made of skins of rabbits, hare, fox or For those who want a real challenge, you at can hike to the top of Mt. Baldy, using the otter; the garment reaches to the waist, Al and Marty Richards’ home. the captain only being allowed to wear Hut as your base camp. Please call Marty at it reaching to the ankle, without other We'll spend the night in the hut. All you (805) 526-4414 mark of distinction. The women wear need to bring is food, your sleeping bag, skirts, made and fitted uncouthly of For directions to their home, and to good boots and 2 - 3 quarts of water.
    [Show full text]