DOCSLIB.ORG

Portolá Trail and Development of Foster City Our Vision Table of Contents to Discover the Past and Imagine the Future

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Portolá Trail and Development of Foster City Our Vision Table of Contents to Discover the Past and Imagine the Future Winter 2014-2015 LaThe Journal of the SanPeninsula Mateo County Historical Association, Volume xliii, No. 1 Portolá Trail and Development of Foster City Our Vision Table of Contents To discover the past and imagine the future. Is it Time for a Portolá Trail Designation in San Mateo County? ....................... 3 by Paul O. Reimer, P.E. Our Mission Development of Foster City: A Photo Essay .................................................... 15 To enrich, excite and by T. Jack Foster, Jr. educate through understanding, preserving The San Mateo County Historical Association Board of Directors and interpreting the history Paul Barulich, Chairman; Barbara Pierce, Vice Chairwoman; Shawn DeLuna, Secretary; of San Mateo County. Dee Tolles, Treasurer; Thomas Ames; Alpio Barbara; Keith Bautista; Sandra McLellan Behling; John Blake; Elaine Breeze; David Canepa; Tracy De Leuw; Dee Eva; Ted Everett; Accredited Pat Hawkins; Mark Jamison; Peggy Bort Jones; Doug Keyston; John LaTorra; Joan by the American Alliance Levy; Emmet W. MacCorkle; Karen S. McCown; Nick Marikian; Olivia Garcia Martinez; Gene Mullin; Bob Oyster; Patrick Ryan; Paul Shepherd; John Shroyer; Bill Stronck; of Museums. Joseph Welch III; Shawn White and Mitchell P. Postel, President. President’s Advisory Board Albert A. Acena; Arthur H. Bredenbeck; John Clinton; Robert M. Desky; T. Jack Foster, The San Mateo County Jr.; Umang Gupta; Greg Munks; Phill Raiser; Cynthia L. Schreurs and John Schrup. Historical Association Leadership Council operates the San Mateo John C. Adams, Wells Fargo; Jenny Johnson, Franklin Templeton Investments; Barry County History Museum Jolette, San Mateo Credit Union and Paul Shepherd, Cargill. and Archives at the old San Mateo County Courthouse La Peninsula located in Redwood City, Carmen J. Blair, Managing Editor Publications Committee: Joan Levy, Publications Chairwoman; Albert A. Acena, Ph.D.; California, and administers Thomas Ames; Carmen J. Blair; Ted Everett; Pat Hawkins; Mitchell P. Postel; Mark S. two county historical sites, Still, Ph.D. and Shawn White. the Sanchez Adobe in Address correspondence to: Editor, La Peninsula, San Mateo County Historical Pacifica and the Woodside Association, 2200 Broadway, Redwood City, CA 94063 or [email protected]. Store in Woodside. Copyright © 2014 San Mateo County Historical Association. Unless otherwise noted, photographs are from the San Mateo County Historical Association. Cover: This statue of Gaspar de Portolá stands in Pacifica across Highway 1 from Pacifica State Beach and the ocean front. It was a 1988 gift from the people of Catalonia, Spain, to the Citizens of California in honor of Portolá’s place in the history of Alta California. Portolá’s statue looks eastward toward the high ridge that he and his expedition climbed on the afternoon of November 4, 1769, and from which his party became the first Europeans to view San Francisco Bay. Photo by and courtesy of Paul O. Reimer. Erratum: In the Summer 2014 issue, page 16, the J.H. Galleher House is incorrectly listed at 785 San Mateo Avenue. It is located at 785 Mills Avenue. La Peninsula, volume xliii, no. 1 Is it Time for a Portolá Trail Designation in San Mateo County? Paul O. Reimer Discovery of San Francisco Bay, a 1971 painting by Morton Künstler, is on exhibit at the San Mateo County History Museum. Don Gaspar de Portolá is depicted viewing the San Francisco Bay from Sweeney Ridge on November 4, 1769. Background for Portolá’s Presence in New Spain Francisco. The first two were destinations already Historic Spanish influence in California needs little visited by Spanish sea captains and heralded for their substantiation beyond the wealth of Spanish place safe and protective harbors. Permanent occupation names that decorate any map of the Golden State. and population of these key locations would insure the However, the absence of this Spanish heritage north territorial claims of Spain that had existed from the time of the Russian River and Fort Ross is also indicative of Juan Cabrillo’s 1542 sea expedition. of the international power contest evident during the Don Gaspar de Portolá, a Catalonian, had been reign of King Carlos III of Spain (1759-1788) as the appointed governor of Baja California in 1767 as a presence of Russian fur traders, from New Archangel, reward for his military service in Spain and Italy. Upon and English explorers, by way of Canada, threatened his arrival in New Spain, which consisted of the Spanish the Spanish claim to Alta California. In response, King holdings in Mexico and America’s Southwest, he was Carlos ordered his visitor general of New Spain, José given the sensitive task of replacing the Jesuit priests de Gálvez, to organize overland expeditions, with with Franciscans at 17 established missions in Baja support by sea, that would establish garrisons and California, the Jesuit order of the Catholic Church permanent missions in Alta California with particular having fallen out of favor with the king. emphasis on San Diego, Monterey and, ultimately, San His success in replacing the priests at the missions 3 was much to his credit. It was this notoriety that led then dispatched to the King Carlos III of Spain on May to Portolá heading the 1769 expedition north from 4, 1770.2 the Presidio of Loreto in Baja California. His goal was In 1773, King Carlos III, reacting to the range of further establishing Spanish claim to Alta California information available to him from Portolá’s exploration by colonization at San Diego and Monterey. After the and influenced by Spanish territorial interests, Russian fateful 78-day march from San Diego Bay, his expedition incursions and English progress across Canada, issued did not recognize Monterey Bay as the party’s leaders two royal edicts. They set forth actions to be taken by saw no expected supply ship or protective harbor. New Spain’s Viceroy Fra Don Antonio de Bucareli who Portolá’s extended march north crossed the Santa had replaced Viceroy Croix (September 1771). Although Cruz coastal plain into what is now San Mateo County. Commandante Pedro Fages, who Portolá had left In fact, his expedition first saw San Francisco Bay from in charge of the newly created Presidio of Monterey, what is now called Sweeney Ridge, recording it as undertook further local exploration in an attempt to big enough to harbor “all the navies of Europe,”1 and reach Point Reyes by land (November 1770), it was returned to San Diego after an arduous six-month trek not until the royal edicts of 1773 reached New Spain with discipline intact and without loss of a man (except that colonization of San Francisco, in addition to San for five “Christianized” Indians who deserted to stay in Diego and Monterey, became a clear objective. With more fertile Alta California). Then, after a brief respite the king’s approval and Viceroy Bucareli’s support, Juan of three months, Portolá led a smaller expedition back Bautista de Anza, commadante of the Presidio at Tubac, to Monterey Bay and the mouth of the Carmel River, pioneered a trail between New Spain’s Tubac, south of establishing both Mission San Carlos and Presidio of Tucson, Arizona, and Alta California’s Monterey, arriving Monterey, thus completing his assigned task. There there on April 19, 1774. This particular linkage was seems to be little mystery to obscure Portolá’s intended of potential logistic value since it offered a land route purpose of strengthening Spanish claim to Alta between New Spain and Alta California which was not California by means of permanent occupation. beset by the risks and seasonality of ocean passage. Upon return to Tubac in late May, Anza was ordered Place in West Coast History to recruit a colonization contingent from New Spain to Turning north on the shore of Monterey Bay led accompany him on the 1,200-mile march to the San Portolá to his most northerly campsite (now in Pacifica). Francisco Peninsula by way of Monterey. The trek to Sweeney Ridge resulted in a significant As the result, some 240 men women and children extension of Alta California’s colonization potential. with approximately 1,000 mules, cattle and horses, left Since Portolá had the blessing of the king and specific the Presidio of Tubac on October 23, 1775, bound for order from the king’s visitor general to occupy and San Francisco Bay. This expedition arrived in Monterey fortify the known harbors at San Diego and Monterey, on March 10, 1776, after a difficult trek in cold winter the king’s representatives in Mexico City hoped for conditions. While the colonizers rested in Monterey, Portolá’s success. Consequently, when the first official Anza rode ahead to the San Francisco Peninsula and journal that included a description of the sighting of by March 28, 1776, had decided upon locations for San Francisco Bay and the report of Portolá’s second both mission and presidio. The actual colonization was effort to initiate a Spanish presence in Monterey arrived left to Anza’s second in command, Lt. José Joaquín on April 24, 1770, Viceroy Croix ordered all bells in Moraga, when Anza was summoned to Mexico City in Mexico City to be rung in celebration. The viceroy’s order to report directly to the viceroy.3 laudatory letter along with the expedition’s report was At the same time that Anza was recruiting 4 La Peninsula, volume xliii, no. 1 his expedition members, Viceroy Bucareli was Process for Portolá Trail Designation implementing another directive of the royal edicts. Diaries of Portolá as well as those of his companions, Don Bruno de Heceta was given command of a Fray Juan Crespi, a Franciscan priest, and Ensign Spanish naval squadron, assembled in San Blas, to Miguel Costansó, an engineer, provide dates and sail northward along the coast of Alta California and, descriptions of the six campsites that the expedition north of Point Reyes, search for any sign of Russian established on its northbound route between Año presence.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Planning and Natural Resources Committee R-19
    PLANNING AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE R-19-140 October 22, 2019 AGENDA ITEM 2 AGENDA ITEM Addendum to the Mindego Hill Ranch Grazing Management Plan to Expand Conservation Grazing into the South Pasture GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION Forward a recommendation to the Board of Directors to adopt an addendum to the Mindego Hill Ranch Grazing Management Plan as an amendment to the Russian Ridge Use and Management Plan that adds the south pasture as part of the conservation grazing area on the property. SUMMARY The General Manager recommends adoption of an addendum to the Mindego Hill Ranch (Mindego) Grazing Management Plan (Grazing Plan) (Attachment 1) to expand the conservation grazing area within Russian Ridge Open Space Preserve (Russian Ridge). The addendum identifies the existing resources and current uses in the proposed south pasture expansion area, and provides recommendations for future improvements, management, and monitoring at the site. The recommendations include: installation of additional water infrastructure, updates to fencing, management of brush encroachment into grasslands, and monitoring of resource management activities. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (District) staff and the current grazing tenant have been working with the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) to secure cost-sharing support for the anticipated improvements. Implementation of the recommended infrastructure improvements is estimated to cost $119,341, of which approximately $85,000 is projected to be the District’s share with the remainder funded by the NRCS. Recommended improvements would span four years with work anticipated to begin in July 2020. If approved, the District’s share would be allocated across the next four fiscal years and requested as part of the annual Budget and Action Plan development process.
    [Show full text]
  • THE EXPLORERS by Richard F. Pourade CHAPTER ONE: BEFORE
    THE EXPLORERS By Richard F. Pourade CHAPTER ONE: BEFORE THE EXPLORERS San Diego was a well populated area before the first Spanish explorers arrived. The climate was wetter and perhaps warmer, and the land more wooded than now. The remnant of a great inland lake covered most of Imperial Valley. The San Diego River wandered back and forth over the broad delta it had formed between Point Loma and Old Town, alternately emptying into Mission Bay and San Diego Bay. The natural food supply was so abundant that the state as a whole supported an Indian population far greater than any equal area in the United States. The native population of the southern counties alone must have been at least 10,000. The early maps made of San Diego Bay by the Spanish explorers show the same general configuration as of today, except, of course, for the many changes in the shoreline made by dredging and filling in recent years. The maps, crudely drawn without proper surveys, vary considerably in detail. Thousands of years ago, in the late part of the Ice Age, Point Loma was an island, as were Coronado and North Island. Coronado used to be known as South Island. There was no bay, as we think of it now. A slightly curving coastline was protected by the three islands, of which, of course, Point Loma was by far the largest. What we now know as Crown Point in Mission Bay was a small peninsula projecting into the ocean. On the mainland, the San Diego and Linda Vista mesas were one continuous land mass.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
    San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan October 2019 Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures.............................................................................................................................. ii Chapter 1: Governance ............................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Governance Team and Structure ...................................................... 1-1 1.2.1 Coordinating Committee ......................................................... 1-2 1.2.2 Stakeholders .......................................................................... 1-3 1.2.2.1 Identification of Stakeholder Types ....................... 1-4 1.2.3 Letter of Mutual Understandings Signatories .......................... 1-6 1.2.3.1 Alameda County Water District ............................. 1-6 1.2.3.2 Association of Bay Area Governments ................. 1-6 1.2.3.3 Bay Area Clean Water Agencies .......................... 1-6 1.2.3.4 Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency ................................................................. 1-8 1.2.3.5 Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District .................................. 1-8 1.2.3.6 Contra Costa Water District .................................. 1-9 1.2.3.7
    [Show full text]
  • Foster City, a Planned Community in the San Francisco Bay Area
    FOS T ER CI T Y - A NEW CI T Y ON T HE BAY A TRIBU T E T O PROFESSOR MI C HAEL MCDOUGALL KAL V IN PLATT As a tribute to Michael McDougall, long-time friend and colleague, Kalvin Platt revisits the Kalvin Platt, FAIA, is project for Foster City, a planned community in the San Francisco Bay Area. Mike was a Chairman of the SWA Group, an International principal planner and designer of this successful story of a new community which, as early Planning and Landscape as 1958, pioneered several planning and urban design maxims that we value today in good Architectural consulting place-making and sustainability. Foster City is a lesson for all of us. firm with 7 offices and award winning projects around the world. Mr. Platt has In the early 1960s; when I came to California as a planner and joined Wilsey, Ham, and Blair, an extensive experience Engineering and Planning Company in Millbrae; I met Michael McDougall. He was working on Foster in Planning New Towns and Communities, City, a new town along the San Francisco Bay. The sinuous “Venice-like” lagoon system that formed Sustainable Land the backbone of the plan amazed me with its inherent beauty and appropriateness to the natural Planning, Urban sloughs that ran along the Bay. What also amazed me was that this was a Master Planned New Design and Park and Town, the first significant effort of this post-WWII large scale planning concept in California and it had Conservation Planning. begun to be built as planned.
    [Show full text]
  • BAYLANDS & CREEKS South San Francisco
    Oak_Mus_Baylands_SideA_6_7_05.pdf 6/14/2005 11:52:36 AM M12 M10 M27 M10A 121°00'00" M28 R1 For adjoining area see Creek & Watershed Map of Fremont & Vicinity 37°30' 37°30' 1 1- Dumbarton Pt. M11 - R1 M26 N Fremont e A in rr reek L ( o te C L y alien a o C L g a Agua Fria Creek in u d gu e n e A Green Point M a o N l w - a R2 ry 1 C L r e a M8 e g k u ) M7 n SF2 a R3 e F L Lin in D e M6 e in E L Creek A22 Toroges Slou M1 gh C ine Ravenswood L Slough M5 Open Space e ra Preserve lb A Cooley Landing L i A23 Coyote Creek Lagoon n M3 e M2 C M4 e B Palo Alto Lin d Baylands Nature Mu Preserve S East Palo Alto loug A21 h Calaveras Point A19 e B Station A20 Lin C see For adjoining area oy Island ote Sand Point e A Lucy Evans Lin Baylands Nature Creek Interpretive Center Newby Island A9 San Knapp F Map of Milpitas & North San Jose Creek & Watershed ra Hooks Island n Tract c A i l s Palo Alto v A17 q i ui s to Creek Baylands Nature A6 o A14 A15 Preserve h g G u u a o Milpitas l Long Point d a S A10 A18 l u d p Creek l A3N e e i f Creek & Watershed Map of Palo Alto & Vicinity Creek & Watershed Calera y A16 Berryessa a M M n A1 A13 a i h A11 l San Jose / Santa Clara s g la a u o Don Edwards San Francisco Bay rd Water Pollution Control Plant B l h S g Creek d u National Wildlife Refuge o ew lo lo Vi F S Environmental Education Center .
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3.4 Biological Resources 3.4- Biological Resources
    SECTION 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 3.4- BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES This section discusses the existing sensitive biological resources of the San Francisco Bay Estuary (the Estuary) that could be affected by project-related construction and locally increased levels of boating use, identifies potential impacts to those resources, and recommends mitigation strategies to reduce or eliminate those impacts. The Initial Study for this project identified potentially significant impacts on shorebirds and rafting waterbirds, marine mammals (harbor seals), and wetlands habitats and species. The potential for spread of invasive species also was identified as a possible impact. 3.4.1 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES SETTING HABITATS WITHIN AND AROUND SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY The vegetation and wildlife of bayland environments varies among geographic subregions in the bay (Figure 3.4-1), and also with the predominant land uses: urban (commercial, residential, industrial/port), urban/wildland interface, rural, and agricultural. For the purposes of discussion of biological resources, the Estuary is divided into Suisun Bay, San Pablo Bay, Central San Francisco Bay, and South San Francisco Bay (See Figure 3.4-2). The general landscape structure of the Estuary’s vegetation and habitats within the geographic scope of the WT is described below. URBAN SHORELINES Urban shorelines in the San Francisco Estuary are generally formed by artificial fill and structures armored with revetments, seawalls, rip-rap, pilings, and other structures. Waterways and embayments adjacent to urban shores are often dredged. With some important exceptions, tidal wetland vegetation and habitats adjacent to urban shores are often formed on steep slopes, and are relatively recently formed (historic infilled sediment) in narrow strips.
    [Show full text]
  • Beach Report Card Program Is Funded by Grants From
    2013-2014 Annual 2013–2014 Heal the Bay is a nonprofit environmental organization making Southern California coastal waters and watersheds, including Santa Monica Bay, safe, healthy and clean. We use science, education, community action and advocacy to pursue our mission. The Beach Report Card program is funded by grants from Swain Barber Foundation ©2014 Heal the Bay. All Rights Reserved. The fishbones logo is a trademark of Heal the Bay. The Beach Report Card is a service mark of Heal the Bay. We at Heal the Bay believe the public has the right to know the water quality at their favorite beaches. We are proud to provide West Coast residents and visitors with this information in an easy-to-understand format. We hope beachgoers will use this information to make the decisions necessary to protect their health. This page: Avalon Bay, Catalina Island Cover photo: The Wedge, Newport Beach TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION ONE Introduction Executive Summary 6 SECTION TWO The Beach Report Card County by County Summary Reports 16 SECTION THREE BRC Impacts and News California Beach Types and Water Quality 48 The Clean Beach Initiative (CBI) 50 Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) 53 Major Beach News 55 Recommendations for the Coming Year 65 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) 70 SECTION FOUR Appendices Methodology for California 76 Methodology for Oregon and Washington 78 2013-2014 Honor Roll 80 Grades by County – California 81 Grades by County – Washington 94 Grades by County – Oregon 97 Index and Glossary 98 Acknowledgements 100 5 Executive Summary Beaches in the U.S. accommodate nearly two billion beach visits each year1 and provide enormous economic benefits to their communities.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Pacific Coast Winter Window Survey Results
    2020 Winter Window Survey for Snowy Plovers on U.S. Pacific Coast with 2013-2020 Results for Comparison. Note: blanks indicate no survey was conducted. REGION SITE OWNER 2017 2018 2019 2020 2020 Date Primary Observer(s) Gray's Harbor Copalis Spit State Parks 0 0 0 0 28-Jan C. Sundstrum Conner Creek State Parks 0 0 0 0 28-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis Damon Point WDNR 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum Oyhut Spit WDNR 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum Ocean Shores to Ocean City 4 10 0 9 28-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis County Total 4 10 0 9 Pacific Midway Beach Private, State Parks 22 28 58 66 27-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis Graveyard Spit Shoalwater Indian Tribe 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum, R. Ashley Leadbetter Point NWR USFWS, State Parks 34 3 15 0 11-Feb W. Ritchie South Long Beach Private 6 0 7 0 10-Feb W. Ritchie Benson Beach State Parks 0 0 0 0 20-Jan W. Ritchie County Total 62 31 80 66 Washington Total 66 41 80 75 Clatsop Fort Stevens State Park (Clatsop Spit) ACOE, OPRD 10 19 21 20-Jan T. Pyle, D. Osis DeLaura Beach OPRD No survey Camp Rilea DOD 0 0 0 No survey Sunset Beach OPRD 0 No survey Del Rio Beach OPRD 0 No survey Necanicum Spit OPRD 0 0 0 20-Jan J. Everett, S. Everett Gearhart Beach OPRD 0 No survey Columbia R-Necanicum R. OPRD No survey County Total 0 10 19 21 Tillamook Nehalem Spit OPRD 0 17 26 19-Jan D.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Context Statement City of Benicia February 2011 Benicia, CA
    Historic Context Statement City of Benicia February 2011 Benicia, CA Prepared for City of Benicia Department of Public Works & Community Development Prepared by page & turnbull, inc. 1000 Sansome Street, Ste. 200, San Francisco CA 94111 415.362.5154 / www.page-turnbull.com Benicia Historic Context Statement FOREWORD “Benicia is a very pretty place; the situation is well chosen, the land gradually sloping back from the water, with ample space for the spread of the town. The anchorage is excellent, vessels of the largest size being able to tie so near shore as to land goods without lightering. The back country, including the Napa and Sonoma Valleys, is one of the finest agriculture districts in California. Notwithstanding these advantages, Benicia must always remain inferior in commercial advantages, both to San Francisco and Sacramento City.”1 So wrote Bayard Taylor in 1850, less than three years after Benicia’s founding, and another three years before the city would—at least briefly—serve as the capital of California. In the century that followed, Taylor’s assessment was echoed by many authors—that although Benicia had all the ingredients for a great metropolis, it was destined to remain in the shadow of others. Yet these assessments only tell a half truth. While Benicia never became the great commercial center envisioned by its founders, its role in Northern California history is nevertheless one that far outstrips the scale of its geography or the number of its citizens. Benicia gave rise to the first large industrial works in California, hosted the largest train ferries ever constructed, and housed the West Coast’s primary ordnance facility for over 100 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Resources Report for the Edgington Oxnard Refinery, Oxnard, Ventura County, California
    Phase I Historic Resources Report for the Edgington Oxnard Refinery, Oxnard, Ventura County, California December 2020 Prepared for: California Resources Corporation Prepared by: Laura Taylor Kung, M.A. Shannon Davis, M.A., RPH 2034 Corte del Nogal Carlsbad, California 92011 (760) 804-5757 ASM Project Number 28101.04 Phase I Historic Resources Report for the Edgington Oxnard Refinery, Oxnard, Ventura County, California Prepared for: California Resources Corporation Prepared by: Laura Taylor Kung, M.A. Shannon Davis, M.A., RPH ASM Affiliates, Inc. 2034 Corte del Nogal Carlsbad, California 92011 December 2020 PN 28101.04 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................ iii 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 1 SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................... 1 Survey Area ............................................................................................................... 2 Field Methods ............................................................................................................ 2 Research Methods ..................................................................................................... 2 Key Personnel ........................................................................................................... 3 2.0 HISTORIC CONTEXT ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 50K Course Guide
    50K COURSE GUIDE IMPORTANT UPDATES (11/02/2017) • NEW COURSE MODIFICATION - Old Inn to Muir Beach • New 2017 Start & Finish Locations • On-Course Nutrition Information • UPDATED Crew and spectator information RACE DAY CHECKLIST PRE-RACE PREPARATION • Review the shuttle and parking information on the website and make a plan for your transportation to the start area. Allow extra time if you are required or planning to take a shuttle. • Locate crew- and spectator-accessible Aid Stations on the course map and inform your family/friends where they can see you on-course. Review the crew and spectator information section of this guide for crew rules and transportation options. • If your distance allows, make a plan with your pacer to meet you at a designated pacer aid station. Review the pacer information section of this guide for pacer rules and transportation options. • Locate the designated drop bag aid stations and prepare a gear bag for the specific drop bag location(s). Review the drop bag information section of this guide for more information regarding on-course drop bag processes and policies. • Pick up your bib and timing device at a designated packet pickup location. • Attend the Pre-Race Panel Discussion for last-minute questions and advice from TNF Athletes and the Race Director. • Check the weather forecast and plan clothing and extra supplies accordingly for both you and your friends/family attending the race and Finish Festival. It is typically colder at the Start/Finish area than it is in the city. • Make sure to have a hydration and fuel plan in place to ensure you are properly nourished throughout your race.
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching the Anza Trail a Five-Day Curriculum for Grades Three and Four in California and Arizona
    Teaching the Anza Trail A Five-Day Curriculum for Grades Three and Four in California and Arizona Produced: 2005, File updated: 2017 National Park Service Juan Bautista de Anza National Historic Trail nps.gov/juba 1 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 7 Acknowledgments ..................................................................................................................................... 8 Supporting Agencies and Individuals: ................................................................................................... 8 Curriculum Standards Applicable to the Anza Trail Lesson Plan .............................................................. 9 California - Social Science...................................................................................................................... 9 Arizona - Social Science ....................................................................................................................... 10 FOCUS: Arizona ................................................................................................................................... 10 The Second Anza Expedition ................................................................................................................... 11 Program Summary .............................................................................................................................. 11 History and
    [Show full text]