DOCSLIB.ORG

Cultural Resources Study for the Aliso Canyon Major Subdivision Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cultural Resources Study for the Aliso Canyon Major Subdivision Project CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDY FOR THE ALISO CANYON MAJOR SUBDIVISION PROJECT RANCHO SANTA FE, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA PDS2014-MPA-14-015 Lead Agency: County of San Diego Planning and Development Services 5510 Overland Avenue, 3rd Floor, Room 310 San Diego, California 92123 (858) 694-3656 Preparer: Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 14010 Poway Road, Suite A Poway, California 92064 (858) 484-0915 ___________________ Signature Project Proponent: Zephyr Partners 700 2nd Street Encinitas, California 92024 June 18, 2014; Revised August 18, 2014 The Aliso Canyon Major Subdivision Project _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ National Archaeological Database Information Author: Brian F. Smith Consulting Firm: Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 14010 Poway Road, Suite A Poway, California 92064 (858) 484-0915 Client/Project Proponent: Zephyr Partners 700 2nd Street Encinitas, California 92024 Report Date: June 18, 2014; Revised August 18, 2014 Report Title: Cultural Resources Study for the Aliso Canyon Major Subdivision Project, Rancho Santa Fe, San Diego County, California Type of Study: Phase I Cultural Resources Survey and Phase II Site Evaluation New Sites: None Updated Site: SDI-6151 USGS Quadrangle: Rancho Santa Fe, California (7.5 minute) Acreage: Approximately 31 acres Key Words: Survey; multi-component; SDI-6151; evaluated as having limited significance; monitoring of grading is recommended; Rancho Santa Fe. i The Aliso Canyon Major Subdivision Project _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents Section Description Page LIST OF ACRONYMS ........................................................................................................... v MANAGEMENT SUMMARY/ABSTRACT ........................................................................ vi 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................1.0–1 1.1 Project Description ...................................................................................................1.0–1 1.2 Existing Conditions ..................................................................................................1.0–5 1.2.1 Environmental Setting ...................................................................................1.0–5 1.2.2 Results of the Archaeological Records Search ..............................................1.0–12 1.3 Applicable Regulations ............................................................................................1.0–14 1.3.1 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) ............................................1.0–15 1.3.2 San Diego County Local Register of Historical Resources (Local Register) 1.0–17 1.3.3 County of San Diego Resource Protection Ordinance (RPO) .......................1.0–18 2.0 GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING SIGNIFICANCE .......................................2.0–1 3.0 RESEARCH DESIGN .............................................................................................3.0–1 4.0 ANALYSIS OF PROJECT EFFECTS ....................................................................4.0–1 4.1 Methods....................................................................................................................4.0–1 4.1.1 Survey Methods .............................................................................................4.0–1 4.1.2 Test Methods ..................................................................................................4.0–6 4.1.3 Laboratory Analysis .......................................................................................4.0–6 4.1.4 Curation ..........................................................................................................4.0–6 4.1.5 Native American Participation .......................................................................4.0–6 4.2 Results of the Field Survey ......................................................................................4.0–6 4.3 Field Investigation ...................................................................................................4.0–7 4.3.1 Surface Collection ..........................................................................................4.0–10 4.3.2 Subsurface Investigation ................................................................................4.0–11 4.4 Artifact Analysis ......................................................................................................4.0–15 4.5 Discussion/Summary ...............................................................................................4.0–18 5.0 INTERPRETATION OF RESOURCE IMPORTANCE AND IMPACT IDENTIFICATION..................................................................................................5.0–1 5.1 Resource Importance ...............................................................................................5.0–1 5.2 Impact Identification ................................................................................................5.0–1 ii The Aliso Canyon Major Subdivision Project _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents (continued) Section Description Page 6.0 MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS – MITIGATION MEASURES AND DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS ...............................................................................6.0–1 6.1 Unavoidable Impacts ...............................................................................................6.0–1 6.2 Mitigable Impacts ....................................................................................................6.0–1 6.3 Significant Adverse Effects .....................................................................................6.0–1 6.4 Native American Heritage Resources/Traditional Properties ..................................6.0–1 7.0 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................7.0–1 8.0 LIST OF PREPARERS AND ORGANIZATIONS CONTACTED .......................8.0–1 9.0 LIST OF MITIGATION MEASURES AND DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS .......9.0–1 List of Appendices Appendix A – Resumes of Key Personnel Appendix B – Updated Site Record Form* Appendix C – Archaeological Records Search Results* Appendix D – NAHC Sacred Lands Files Search Results Appendix E – Confidential Maps* Appendix F – Artifact Catalog * Deleted for public review and bound separately in the Confidential Appendix List of Figures Section Description Page Figure 1.1–1 General Location Map ...................................................................................1.0–2 Figure 1.1–2 Project Location Map (USGS) ......................................................................1.0–3 Figure 1.1–3 Project Development Map .............................................................................1.0–4 Figure 4.1–1 Cultural Resource Location Map* .................................................................4.0–5 Figure 4.3–1 Site Investigation Map, SDI-6151 Locus 1* .................................................4.0–8 Figure 4.3–2 Site Investigation Map, SDI-6151 Locus 2* .................................................4.0–9 * Deleted for public review and bound separately in the Confidential Appendix iii The Aliso Canyon Major Subdivision Project _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ List of Plates Section Description Page Plate 4.1–1 Overview of the project area looking east from Aliso Canyon Road / looking west from the southern portion of the property ................................................4.0–2 Plate 4.1–2 Overview of the project area looking south from the central portion of the property / looking southeast from the northern portion of the property ...........4.0–3 Plate 4.1–3 Example of prehistoric artifacts from SDI-6151 Locus 1 / Example of prehistoric and historic artifacts from SDI-6151 Locus 2 ................................4.0–4 List of Tables Section Description Page Table 1.2–1 Cultural Resources Within One Mile of the Project Area ..............................1.0–13 Table 4.3–1 Prehistoric Surface Collection Data for Site SDI-6151 Locus 1 ....................4.0–10 Table 4.3–2 Prehistoric Surface Collection Data for Site SDI-6151 Locus 2 ....................4.0–10 Table 4.3–3 Historic Surface Collection Data for Site SDI-6151 Locus 2 .........................4.0–11 Table 4.3–4 Shovel Test Excavation Data for Site SDI-6151 Locus 1 ..............................4.0–12 Table 4.3–5 TU I Excavation Data for Site SDI-6151 Locus 1 ..........................................4.0–13 Table 4.3–6 Shovel Test Excavation Data for Site SDI-6151 Locus 2 ..............................4.0–14 Table 4.3–7 TU I Excavation Data for Site SDI-6151 Locus 2 ..........................................4.0–15 Table 4.4–1 Cultural Materials Recovered From Site SDI-6151 Locus 2 ..........................4.0–16 Table 4.4–2 Functional Categories Represented by Cultural Materials Recovered From Site SDI-6151 Locus 2 ....................................................................................4.0–17 Table 4.4–3 Bulk Weight of Cultural Materials Recovered From Site SDI-6151 Locus 2 ............................................................................................................4.0–17 Table 4.4–4 Temporally Diagnostic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Attachment B-4 San Diego RWQCB Basin Plan Beneficial Uses
    Attachment B-4 San Diego RWQCB Basin Plan Beneficial Uses Regulatory_Issues_Trends.doc CHAPTER 2 BENEFICIAL USES INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................1 BENEFICIAL USES ..........................................................................................................................1 BENEFICIAL USE DESIGNATION UNDER THE PORTER-COLOGNE WATER QUALITY CONTROL ACT ..1 BENEFICIAL USE DESIGNATION UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT .................................................2 BENEFICIAL USE DEFINITIONS.........................................................................................................3 EXISTING AND POTENTIAL BENEFICIAL USES ..................................................................................7 BENEFICIAL USES FOR SPECIFIC WATER BODIES ........................................................................8 DESIGNATION OF RARE BENEFICIAL USE ...................................................................................8 DESIGNATION OF COLD FRESHWATER HABITAT BENEFICIAL USE ...............................................9 DESIGNATION OF SPAWNING, REPRODUCTION, AND/ OR EARLY DEVELOPMENT (SPWN) BENEFICIAL USE ...................................................................................................11 SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER POLICY ..................................................................................11 EXCEPTIONS TO THE "SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER" POLICY................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Water, Capitalism, and Urbanization in the Californias, 1848-1982
    TIJUANDIEGO: WATER, CAPITALISM, AND URBANIZATION IN THE CALIFORNIAS, 1848-1982 A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History By Hillar Yllo Schwertner, M.A. Washington, D.C. August 14, 2020 Copyright 2020 by Hillar Yllo Schwertner All Rights Reserved ii TIJUANDIEGO: WATER, CAPITALISM, AND URBANIZATION IN THE CALIFORNIAS, 1848-1982 Hillar Yllo Schwertner, M.A. Dissertation Advisor: John Tutino, Ph.D. ABSTRACT This is a history of Tijuandiego—the transnational metropolis set at the intersection of the United States, Mexico, and the Pacific World. Separately, Tijuana and San Diego constitute distinct but important urban centers in their respective nation-states. Taken as a whole, Tijuandiego represents the southwestern hinge of North America. It is the continental crossroads of cultures, economies, and environments—all in a single, physical location. In other words, Tijuandiego represents a new urban frontier; a space where the abstractions of the nation-state are manifested—and tested—on the ground. In this dissertation, I adopt a transnational approach to Tijuandiego’s water history, not simply to tell “both sides” of the story, but to demonstrate that neither side can be understood in the absence of the other. I argue that the drawing of the international boundary in 1848 established an imbalanced political ecology that favored San Diego and the United States over Tijuana and Mexico. The land and water resources wrested by the United States gave it tremendous geographical and ecological advantages over its reeling southern neighbor, advantages which would be used to strengthen U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • South Laguna Biological Resources Inventory
    SOUTH LAGUMA BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES INVENTORY Prepared for the City of Laguna Beach By Karl in G. Marsh, Biological Consul tant January 20, 1992 Karlin C. Marsh Biological Consultant 30262 Acorn Lane, P.O. Box 404, Silverado, California 92676 714/649-202 7 SOUTH LAGUNA BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES INVENTORY Prepared for the City of Laguna Beach By Karlin 6. Marsh, Biological Consultant Uith Contributions by Fred Roberts, Jr. r Dave Bramlet r Gordon Marsh Rick Reifner January 20, 1992 Dedicated With Affection and Admiration to FREDERICK M. LAN6 Longtime champion of South Laguna's special natural resources TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 BOUNDARIES AND PHYSICAL SETTING 1 SURROUNDING AND ONSITE LAND USES; OWNERSHIP 3 METHODS 5 EXISTING LITERATURE 6 BIOTIC COMMUNITIES 8 MARITIME SUCCULENT SCRUB (2.2) COASTAL SAGE SCRUB (2.3) SUMAC-TOYON SOUTHERN MIXED CHAPARRAL (3.2) SOUTHERN MARITIME CHAPARRAL (3.6) ANNUAL GRASSLAND (4.1) SOUTHERN COASTAL NEEDLEGRASS GRASSLAND (4.3) RUDERAL (4.6) I SOUTHERN HARDPAN VERNAL POOL (5.1) FRESHWATER SEEP (5.3) I ALKALI MEADOW (5.2) SOUTHERN COASTAL SALT MARSH (6.1) I COASTAL BRACKISH MARSH (6.2) I COASTAL FRESHWATER MARSH (6.4) RIPARIAN HERB (7.1) I SOUTHERN WILLOW SCRUB (7.2) MULEFAT SCRUB (7.3) SOUTHERN ARROYO WILLOW FOREST (7.6) COAST LIVE OAK WOODLAND (8.1) I XERIC CLIFF FACES (10.1) I XERIC BARRENS (10.1) Page MARINE TERRACE PSAMMOPHYTE HABITAT (10.1) MESIC CLIFF FACES (10.2) ROCK OUTCROPS (10.3) PERENNIAL STREAM (13.1) INTERMITTENT STREAM (13.2) EPHEMERAL STREAM (13.3) VINEYARD AND ORCHARD (14.3) ORNAMENTAL PLANTINGS (15.5) FUEL MODIFICATION ZONES (no G.I.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Management Plan Forest Service
    United States Department of Agriculture Land Management Plan Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region Part 2 Angeles National R5-MB-076 Forest Strategy September 2005 Land Management Plan Part 2 Angeles National Forest Strategy R5-MB-076 September 2005 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, Write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Cover collage contains a photograph by Ken Lubas (lower right), reprinted with permission (copyright, 2005, Los Angeles Times). Table of Contents Tables and Figures .................................................................................................................................... iv Document Format Protocols.......................................................................................................................v
    [Show full text]
  • Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, Circa 1852-1904
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/hb109nb422 Online items available Finding Aid to the Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, circa 1852-1904 Finding Aid written by Michelle Morton and Marie Salta, with assistance from Dean C. Rowan and Randal Brandt The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ © 2008, 2013 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Finding Aid to the Documents BANC MSS Land Case Files 1852-1892BANC MSS C-A 300 FILM 1 Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in Cali... Finding Aid to the Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, circa 1852-1904 Collection Number: BANC MSS Land Case Files The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Finding Aid Written By: Michelle Morton and Marie Salta, with assistance from Dean C. Rowan and Randal Brandt. Date Completed: March 2008 © 2008, 2013 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Collection Summary Collection Title: Documents pertaining to the adjudication of private land claims in California Date (inclusive): circa 1852-1904 Collection Number: BANC MSS Land Case Files 1852-1892 Microfilm: BANC MSS C-A 300 FILM Creators : United States. District Court (California) Extent: Number of containers: 857 Cases. 876 Portfolios. 6 volumes (linear feet: Approximately 75)Microfilm: 200 reels10 digital objects (1494 images) Repository: The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ Abstract: In 1851 the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Plans
    Appendix B Construction Plans Appendix C Photographic Record Log Laguna Canyon Road Drainage Improvements Project Photo Log Photograph: 1 Photo Date: June 5, 2009 Location: South of DS-110 project limits Direction: South Comment: Wide u-shaped feature with erosional rills on eastern side of channel. No scouring of vegetation along base of channel to indicate flows. Non-native grasses dominate. Photograph: 2 Photo Date: June 5, 2009 Location: DS-110 Direction: Southeast Comment: Feature is more swale-like in appearance, less defined, no evident OHWM or indication of regular flows. Feature narrows the terminal end is located on an upward slope. Photograph: 3 Photo Date: June 5, 2009 Location: DS-110 Direction: Northwest Comment: Hill slope topography evident. DS-110 is isolated from DS-64A at the base of the coastal sage scrub vegetated hill. 1 Laguna Canyon Road Drainage Improvements Project Photo Log Photograph: 4 Photo Date: June 16, 2009 Location: DS-64A Direction: Southeast Comment: Narrow roadside ditch appears to receive flows from the side of the road (right of frame in background). No connection to DS-110. Photograph: 5 Photo Date: June 16, 2009 Location: DS-64A Direction: Northwest Comment: Culvert of DS-64A passing below the IRWD access road. Recent vegetation mowing has occurred alongside the road. Photograph: 6 Photo Date: June 16, 2009 Location: DS-64A Direction: Northeast Comment: Sandbags placed in erosional runoff along steep IRWD access road. Flows connect with the outlet portion of DS-64A. 2 Laguna Canyon Road Drainage Improvements Project Photo Log Photograph: 7 Photo Date: June 5, 2009 Location: DS-11 Direction: West Comment: Culvert is 48” in diameter.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Southeastern Ventura Basin Los Angeles County California
    Geology of Southeastern Ventura Basin Los Angeles County California By E. L. WINTERER and D. L. DURHAM SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 334-H A study of the stratigraphy, structure, and occurrence of oil in the late Cenozoic Ventura basin UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1962 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEW ART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract ____________________________________________ 275 Stratigraphy Continued Introduction.______________________________________ 276 Tertiary system Continued Purpose and scope.------_______________________ 276 Pliocene series..._________------__---__----- 308 Fieldwork __ __________________________________ 276 Pico formation.____________-_----_-_-_- 308 Acknowledgments. _ _----_-_-.________________- 276 Stratigraphy and lithology___________ 309 Geography. _________________________________________ 278 Newhall-Potrero area__________ 309 Climate- ______--_-__-_-__-_--_-_____________-_ 278 Newhsll-Potrero oil field to East Vegetation.____________________________________ 278 Canyon____________________ 310 Santa Clara River______________________________ 278 Mouth of East Canyon to San Fer­ Relief. __.._.._._._________---_-_--_________ 278 nando Pass__-----_-_-------- 311 Human activities----_------__--________________ 278 San Fernando Pass to San Gabriel Physiography_ _____________________________________ 278 fault..____-__-__-_------.--_ 311 Structural and lithologic control of drainage______ 279 Santa Clara River to Del Valle River terraces and old erosion surfaces-__ _________ 279 fault.___----.--_-_---------_ 312 Present erosion cycle.___________________________ 281 Del Valle fault to Holser fault__ 312 Landslides- ___--.-------_-_--___________________ 281 Area north of Holser fault- ______ 312 Stratigraphy.______________________________________ 281 Fossils..
    [Show full text]
  • Aliso and Wood Canyons Wilderness Park County of Orange, California
    LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN AUGUST 2009 ALISO AND WOOD CANYONS WILDERNESS PARK COUNTY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 7.0 PUBLIC ACCESS AND RECREATION MANAGEMENT 7.1 INTRODUCTION The location of AWCWP within a growing metropolitan area with good highway access and opportunities for use year-round have made it an extremely popular recreation destination for local residents and regional, national, and international visitors alike. The park offers many opportunities for recreation use, including hiking, running, mountain cycling, equestrian use, nature viewing, birding, painting, photography, and wilderness education with an extensive network of trails. Hitching rails located at the park entrance, Wood Canyon at Mathis Trail, and at the Old Sycamore Grove accommodate equestrian uses, and a rest area located under the Sycamore Trees provides for small gatherings in the park. Among the permitted uses in the park, mountain cycling is the most popular. In fact, mountain cycling had been a common use in Aliso and Wood Canyons prior to the establishment of the AWCWP. Mountain cycling activities, both past and present, are indicative of the high public demands for open natural terrain in the county. The fact that the park site borders on so many different communities has resulted in increased demands on the site as a valuable open space resource. These demands can be expected to increase in future decades as the population in Orange County continues to grow and open space areas continue to diminish. Given the definition of Wilderness Park, public access and recreation are considered secondary to the primary goal of protecting and restoring the natural and cultural resources of the park.
    [Show full text]
  • Tehachapi Renewable FEIS Volume III Appendix B2 Biological Evaluation.Pdf
    Appendix B.2 Biological Evaluation TRTP BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION 2010 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 1 CURRENT MANAGEMENT DIRECTION .............................................................................................. 15 Forest Land and Resources Management Plan (LRMP) ......................................................................... 15 Program Strategies and Tactics ...................................................................................................... 16 Applicable Land Management Plan Standards .............................................................................. 17 Forest Service Manual 2081.03 .............................................................................................................. 19 Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (1940) ........................................................................................ 20 Bald Eagle Management Guidelines (2007) ........................................................................................... 20 California Spotted Owl Conservation Strategy ....................................................................................... 20 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................................... 22 Segment 11: Mesa – Vincent (via Gould) 500/220 kV T/L ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Laguna Canyon Biological Resources Inventory
    LAGUNA CANYON BIOLOGICAL- RESOURCES INVENTORY Prepared for the City of Laguna Beach, California By Karlin G. Marsh, Biological Consultant With Contributions by James Pike, Consulting Ornithologist May 28, 1993 Karlin C. Marsh Biological Consultant ~~~amtmre;-Pre.X-464;SitWra~fatifmia926-76 7W9.3829 Rural Route 1, Box 958, Meadville, Pennsylvania 16335 (814) 333-2016 LAGUNA CANYON BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES INVENTORY Prepared for the City of Laguna Beach, California By Karlin G. Marsh, Biological Consultant Rural Route 1, Box 958 Meadville, Pennsylvania 16335 (814) 333-2016 Contributions by James Pike, Consulting Ornithologist 18744 Beach Blvd., Dpx. E Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 968-7977 May 28, 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION ...................................... 1 PURPOSE OF STUDY ..................................... 1 1.1.1 History of City Resource Inventory Work ...... 1.1.2 What Lies Ahead .............................. 2 1.1.3 Objectives ......................... .......... 4 PHYSICAL SETTING .................................... 4 1.2.1 Area of Survey ............................... 4 1.2.2 Topography and Hydrology..................... 5 1. Hydrology................................ 5 2 . Topography............................... 7 1.2.3 Geology ...................................... 7 1.2.4 Soils ........................................ 8 PRIOR INVENTORIES ................................... 9 1.3.1 Laguna Canyon ................................ 9 1.3.2 Laguna Heights............................... 11 1.3.3 General
    [Show full text]
  • Here Are Five of Our Favorite Kid-Friendly Trails
    ENJOY HIKING WITH YOUR KIDS PICKP I C K UPU P A PASSPORTP A S S P O R T ATA T ANYA N Y REIR E I STORES T O R E REI’sREI’s PassportPassport toto AdventureAdventure programprogram invitesinvites youyou andand yyourour kidskids toto eexplorexplore ssomeome ggreatreat hikinghiking trailstrails nnearby.earby. ToTo helphelp getget you started, REI employees have described some of their favorite local family hikes below. Here’s how you can get the most fun out of doing them together. • First, pick up a Passport to Adventure journal at Customer Service in your local REI store. • Take fi ve family hikes by the end of this summer; feel free to use our trail suggestions below. • Have your child record his or her hike experiences in the Passport journal. • Starting August 1, every child who brings in the Passport with all fi ve hikes completed will receive a Certifi cate of Completion and a commemorative Passport to Adventure water bottle (while supplies last). Here Are Five of Our Favorite Kid-Friendly Trails Hike One: Aliso Canyon Trail Hike Description: This is a nice introduction to the Aliso and Wood Canyons Wilderness Park. From the parking lot, the trail passes through the Aliso Creek habitat, which is a fi ne place to watch native birds. Rating: Easy Coyotes and deer are also frequent visitors. In fact, the park is full of rare and endangered plants and Distance: 1.5 miles roundtrip, animals. Two streams fl ow year-round. Relatively level, the Aliso Canyon Trail is suitable for young minimal elevation gain children.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.8 Hydrology and Water Quality
    4.8 Hydrology and Water Quality 4.8 Hydrology and Water Quality This section describes potential hydrology and water quality impacts associated with construction and operation of the Proposed Project. Project components that do not involve ground disturbance or groundwater impacts were not evaluated in this section. These components include installation of upgraded relay systems and equipment at the SCE Newhall, Chatsworth, and San Fernando Substations. 4.8.1 Existing Hydrology and Water Quality Setting The Proposed Project lies within both the Santa Clara River Valley watershed and the Los Angeles River (San Fernando Valley) watershed, as presented on Figure 4.8-1 Hydrology and Floodplains. These watersheds are divided by the east/west trending Santa Susana Mountains. The Proposed Project components including the proposed Central Compressor Station, proposed office trailer and guard house relocation, proposed SCE Natural Substation and almost half of the proposed SCE 66 kV sub- transmission lines are located within and south of the Santa Susana Mountains in the Los Angeles River watershed. The remainder of the proposed SCE 66 kV sub-transmission line modification is located in the Santa Clara River Valley watershed, north of the Santa Susana Mountains. The Santa Clara River Valley watershed encompasses the Santa Clara River, the largest river system in southern California that remains in a relatively natural state. The river originates in the northern slopes of the San Gabriel Mountains in north Los Angeles County, traverses in a westerly direction into Ventura County, and discharges into the Pacific Ocean near the city of Ventura. The river runs approximately 100 miles from its headwaters near Acton, California, to its outlet, and drains an area of approximately 1,600 square miles.
    [Show full text]