Climate Zone Descriptions ______

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Climate Zone Descriptions ______ Climate Zone Descriptions _________________________________________________________________________________________ The following pages are a listing of the climate zones associated with several thousand specific California cities, towns and other locations. This information represents an abridged version of the Commission publication California Climate Zone Descriptions, which contains detailed survey definitions of the sixteen climate zones. Climate Zone Descriptions June 2001 1 Zone Location:City, County Zone Location:City, County Zone Location:City, County ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 16 Ambrose, Modoc 12 Aukum, El Dorado 2 American Canyon, Napa 6 Avalon, Los Angeles 12 American River, Sacramento 14 Avawatz Mountains, 16 American River (Silver Fork), San Bernardino El Dorado 13 Avenal, Kings 15 Amos, Imperial 5 Avila Beach, San Luis Obispo A 6 Anacapa Island, Ventura 16 Avocado Heights, Los Angeles 8 Anaheim, Orange 9 Azusa, Los Angeles 3 Abbotts Lagoon, Marin 1 Anchor Bay, Mendocino 13 Academy, Fresno 11 Anderson, Shasta B 12 Acampo, San Joaquin 4 Anderson Lake, Santa Clara 15 Acolita, Imperial 15 Andrade, Imperial 13 Badger, Tulare 14 Actis, Kern 3 Angel Island, Marin 12 Bagby, Mariposa 14 Acton, Los Angeles 12 Angels Camp, Calaveras 15 Bagdad, San Bernardino 4 Adelaida, San Luis Obispo 13 Angiola, Tulare 14 Baker, San Bernardino 14 Adelanto, San Bernardino 2 Angwin, Napa 13 Bakersfield, Kern 16 Adin, Modoc 1 Annapolis, Sonoma 14 Balch, San Bernardino 13 Adobe, Kern 12 Antelope, Sacramento 16 Bald Eagle Mountain, Plumas 14 Afton, San Bernardino 14 Antelope Center, Los Angeles 9 Baldwin Park, Los Angeles 6 Ager, Siskiyou 16 Antelope Lake, Plumas 14 Ballarat, Inyo 9 Agoura Hills, Los Angeles 13 Antelope Plain, Kern 2 Ballico, Merced 5 Agua Caliente Canyon, 14 Antelope Valley, Los Angeles 11 Bangor, Butte Santa Barbara 12 Antioch, Contra Costa 15 Banning, Riverside 15 Agua Caliente Springs, San 16 Anza, Riverside 12 Banta, San Joaquinn Diego 16 Apache Canyon, Ventura 15 Bard, Imperial 9 Agua Duice, Los Angeles 14 Apple Valley, San Bernardino 9 Bardsdale, Ventura 10 Aguanga, Riverside 11 Applegate, Placer 2 Barkerville, Lake 13 Ahwahnee, Madera 3 Aptos, Santa Curz 16 Barkley Mountain, Tehama 14 Airport Lake, Inyo 15 Araz Wash, Imperial 10 Barona, San Diego 3 Alameda, Alameda 11 Arbuckle, Colusa 10 Barrett Dam, San Diego 12 Alameda County 9 Arcadia, Los Angeles 10 Barrett Junction, San Diego 12 Alamo, Contra Costa 1 Arcata, Humboldt 14 Barstow, San Bernardino 15 Alamo River, Imperial 1 Arcata Bay, Humboldt 16 Bartle, Siskiyou 3 Albany, Alameda 12 Arden Town, Sacramento 16 Bartlett, Inyo 10 Alberhill, Riverside 14 Argus, San Bernardino 2 Bartlett Springs, Lake 1 Albion, Mendocino 16 Argus Peak, Inyo 16 Bass Lake, Madera 2 Alderpoint, Humboldt 16 Argus Range, Inyo 9 Bassett, Los Angeles 9 Alhambra, Los Angeles 10 Arlington, Riverside 16 Baxter, Placer 3 Alisal, Monterey 13 Armona, Kings 16 Bayley, Modoc 3 Alisal Slough, Monterey 16 Arnold, Calaveras 11 Bayliss, Glenn 16 Aliso Canyon, Los Angeles 2 Arnold, Mendocino 1 Bayside, Humboldt 8 Aliso Viejo, Orange 3 Aromas, Monterey 5 Baywood Park, San Luis Obispo 6 Alleghany, Sierra 14 Arrowhead Junction, 11 Beale Air Force Base, Yuba 12 Allendale, Solano San Bernardino 2 Bear Buttes, Humboldt 13 Allensworth, Tulare 4 Arroyo Dos Picachos, San Benito 16 Bear River, Amador 4 Almaden A.F.S., Santa Clara 5 Arroyo Grande, San Luis Obispo 1 Bear River, Humboldt 16 Almanor, Plumas 13 Arroyo Hondo, Fresno 11 Bear River, Sutter/Yuba 6 Alondra Park, Los Angeles 4 Arroyo Hondo, Santa Clara 12 Bear Valley, Mariposa 13 Alpaugh, Tulare 15 Arroyo Salada, Imperial 16 Beardsley Lake, Tuolumne 16 Alpine County 4 Arroyo Seco, Monterey 10 Beaumont, Riverside 10 Alpine, San Diego 8 Artesia, Los Angeles 16 Beckwourth, Plumas 16 Alta, Placer 11 Artois, Glenn 16 Beckwourth Pass, Lassen/Plumas 10 Alta Loma, San Bernardino 13 Arvin, Kern 11 Beegum, Shasta 16 Alta Sierra, Kern 13 Ash Mountain, Tulare 16 Belden, Plumas 9 Altadena, Los Angeles 3 Ashland, Alameda 8 Bell, Los Angeles 12 Altamont, Alameda 16 Aspen Valley, Tuolumne 8 Bell Gardens, Los Angeles 12 Altaville, Calaveras 2 Asti, Sonoma 14 Bell Mountain, San Bernardino 6 Alton, Humboldt 4 Atascadero, San Luis Obispo 14 Bell Mountain Wash, 16 Alturas, Modoc 3 Atherton, San Mateo San Bernardino 4 Alviso, Santa Clara 12 Athlone, Merced 2 Bell Springs, Mendocino 12 Amador, Amador 14 Atolia, San Bernardino 4 Bell Station, Santa Clara 12/16 Amador County 12 Atwater, Merced 11 Bella Vista, Shasta 14 Amargosa Range, Inyo 13 Auberry, Fresno 8 Bellflower, Los Angeles 14 Amargosa River, Inyo 11 Auburn, Placer 12 Bellota, San Joaquin 15 Amboy, San Bernardino 11 Auburn Ravine, Sutter 3 Belmont, San Mateo Climate Zone Descriptions June 2005 1 Zone Location:City, County Zone Location:City, County Zone Location:City, County ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 3 Belvedere, Marin 13 Blackwells Corner, Kern 12 Brooks Ranch, Yolo 12 Ben Hur, Mariposa 16 Blairsden, Plumas 14 Brown, Kern 3 Ben Lomond, Santa Cruz 2 Blocksburg, Humboldt 11 Browns Valley, Yuba 2 Benbow, Humboldt 2 Bloomfield, Sonoma 11 Brownsville, Yuba 11 Bend, Tehama 10 Bloomington, San Bernardino 1 Bruhel Point, Mendocino 12 Benicia, Solano 11 Blossom, Tehama 16 Brush Creek, Butte 14 Bennetts Well, Inyo 16 Blue Canyon, Placer 14 Bryman, San Bernardino 16 Benton, Mono 1 Blue Lake, Humboldt 4 Bryson, Monterey 16 Benton Hot Springs, Mono 11 Blunt, Tehama 12 Bryte, Yolo 13 Berenda, Madera 15 Blythe, Riverside 16 Buck Meadows, Mariposa 3 Berkeley, Alameda 16 Boca, Nevada 11 Buckeye, Shasta 11 Berry Creek, Butte 16 Boca Reservoir, Nevada 14 Buckhorn Lake, Kern 4 Berryessa, Santa Clara 1 Bodega, Sonoma 16 Bucks Lake, Plumas 2 Berryessa Lake, Napa 3 Bodega Bay, Marin 14 Budweiser Wash, San 2/3 Berryessa Peak, Napa/Yolo 1 Bodega Bay, Sonoma Bernardino 16 Beswick, Siskiyou 1 Bodega Head, Sonoma 5 Buellton, Santa Barbara 12 Bethany, San Joaquin 16 Bodfish, Kern 8 Buena Park, Orange 12 Bethel Island, Contra Costa 16 Bodie, Mono 12 Buena Vista, Amador 5 Betteravia, Santa Barbara 16 Bolam, Siskiyou 13 Buena Vista Lake Bed, Kern 9 Beverly Hills, Los Angeles 3 Bolinas, Marin 1 Bull Creek, Humboldt 16 Bieber, Lassen 16 Bollibokka Mountain, Shasta 14 Bull Spring Wash, San 16 Big Bar, Trinity 3 Bolsa Knolls, Monterey Bernardino 3 Big Basin, Santa Cruz 15 Bombay Beach, Imperial 14 Bullion Mountains, San 16 Big Bear City, San Bernardino 13 Bonadella Ranchos – Madera Bernardino 16 Big Bear Lake, San Bernardino Rancho, Fresno 16 Buntingville, Lassen 16 Big Bend, Butte 16 Bonanza King, Trinity 9 Burbank, Los Angeles 16 Big Bend, Shasta 15 Bonds Corner, Imperial 2 Burbeck, Mendocino 2 Big Bend, Sonoma 13 Bonita, Madera 2 Burdell, Marin 16 Big Creek, Fresno 3 Bonny Doon, Santa Cruz 3 Burlingame, San Mateo 1 Big Lagoon, Humboldt 10 Bonsall, San Diego 16 Burney, Shasta 16 Big Lake, Shasta 2 Boonville, Mendocino 16 Burney Mountain, Shasta 15 Big Maria Mountains, Riverside 12 Bootjack, Mariposa 16 Burnt Ranch, Trinity 2 Big Mountains, Sonoma 14 Boron, Kern 13 Burrelield, Fresno 12 Big Oak Flat, Tuolumne 15 Borrego, San Diego 12 Burson, Calaveras 16 Big Pine, Inyo 15 Borrego Springs, San Diego 1 Butler Valley, Humboldt 16 Big Pines, Los Angeles 10 Bostonia, San Diego 11 Butte City, Glenn 14 Big Rock Wash, Los Angeles 3 Boulder Creek, Santa Cruz 11/16 Butte County 16 Big Sage Reservoir, Modoc 14 Boulevard, San Diego 16 Butte Meadows, Butte 16 Big Springs, Siskiyou 13 Bowles, Fresno 16 Butte Valley, Siskiyou 4 Big Sur, Monterey 11 Bowman, Placer 13 Buttonwillow, Kern 4 Big Sur River (North Fork), 15 Box Canyon, Riverside 12 Byron, Contra Costa Monterey 2 Boyes Hot Springs, Sonoma 16 Big Tujungs Canyon, 9 Bradbury, Los Angeles C Los Angeles 4 Bradley, Monterey 16 Big Valley Mountains, 12 Brannan Island, Sacramento 15 Cabazon, Riverside Lassen/Modoc 1 Branscomb, Mendocino 7 Cabrillo National Monument, 11 Biggs, Butte 14 Brant, San Bernardino San Diego 16 Bijou, El Dorado 15 Brawley, Imperial 5 Cachuma Lake, Santa Barbara 13 Biola, Fresno 16 Bray, Siskiyou 15 Cadiz, San Bernardino 12 Birds Landing, Solano 8 Brea, Orange 15 Cadiz Lake, San Bernardino 16 Bishop, Inyo 16 Breckenridge Mountain, Kern 15 Cadiz Valley, San Bernardino 14 Bissell, Kern 12 Brentwood, Contra Costa 14 Cady Mountains, San 4 Bitterwater, San Benito 12 Briceburg, Mariposa Bernardino 16 Black Bear, Siskiyou 2 Briceland, Humboldt 2 Cahto Peak, Mendocino 16 Black Butte, Glenn 12 Bridge House, Sacramento 16 Cahuilla, Riverside 11 Black Butte Reservoir, 16 Bridgeport, Mono 16 Cajon Junction, San Bernardino Glenn/Tehama 16 Bridgeport Reservoir, Mono 16 Cajon Summit, San Bernardino 16 Black Butte River, Mendocino 2 Bridgeville, Humboldt 9 Calabasas, Los Angeles 14 Black Canyon Wash, 12 Briones Reservoir, Contra Costa 14 Calada, San Bernardino San Bernardino 3 Brisbane, San Mateo 12/16 Calaveras County 15 Black Meadow Landing, 15 Bristol Lake, San Bernardino 12/4 Calaveras Reservoir, San Bernardino 14 Bristol Mountains, Alameda/Santa Clara 13 Black Mountain, Fresno San Bernardino 12 Calaveras River, San Joaquin 2 Black Point, Marin 12 Broderick, Yolo 12 Calaveritas, Calaveras 12 Blackhawk, Contra Costa 3 Brookdale, Santa Cruz 13 Calders Corner, Kern 2 June 2001 Climate Zone Descriptions Zone Location:City, County Zone Location:City, County Zone Location:City, County ____________________________________________________________________________________________
Recommended publications
  • Wilderness Visitors and Recreation Impacts: Baseline Data Available for Twentieth Century Conditions
    United States Department of Agriculture Wilderness Visitors and Forest Service Recreation Impacts: Baseline Rocky Mountain Research Station Data Available for Twentieth General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-117 Century Conditions September 2003 David N. Cole Vita Wright Abstract __________________________________________ Cole, David N.; Wright, Vita. 2003. Wilderness visitors and recreation impacts: baseline data available for twentieth century conditions. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-117. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 52 p. This report provides an assessment and compilation of recreation-related monitoring data sources across the National Wilderness Preservation System (NWPS). Telephone interviews with managers of all units of the NWPS and a literature search were conducted to locate studies that provide campsite impact data, trail impact data, and information about visitor characteristics. Of the 628 wildernesses that comprised the NWPS in January 2000, 51 percent had baseline campsite data, 9 percent had trail condition data and 24 percent had data on visitor characteristics. Wildernesses managed by the Forest Service and National Park Service were much more likely to have data than wildernesses managed by the Bureau of Land Management and Fish and Wildlife Service. Both unpublished data collected by the management agencies and data published in reports are included. Extensive appendices provide detailed information about available data for every study that we located. These have been organized by wilderness so that it is easy to locate all the information available for each wilderness in the NWPS. Keywords: campsite condition, monitoring, National Wilderness Preservation System, trail condition, visitor characteristics The Authors _______________________________________ David N.
    [Show full text]
  • Eagle Crest Energy Gen-Tie and Water Pipeline Environmental
    Eagle Crest Energy Gen-Tie and Water Pipeline Environmental Assessment and Proposed California Desert Conservation Area Plan Amendment BLM Case File No. CACA-054096 BLM-DOI-CA-D060-2016-0017-EA BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT California Desert District 22835 Calle San Juan De Los Lagos Moreno Valley, CA 92553 April 2017 USDOI Bureau of Land Management April 2017Page 2 Eagle Crest Energy Gen-Tie and Water Pipeline EA and Proposed CDCA Plan Amendment United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT California Desert District 22835 Calle San Juan De Los Lagos Moreno Valley, CA 92553 April XX, 2017 Dear Reader: The U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has finalized the Environmental Assessment (EA) for the proposed right-of-way (ROW) and associated California Desert Conservation Area Plan (CDCA) Plan Amendment (PA) for the Eagle Crest Energy Gen- Tie and Water Supply Pipeline (Proposed Action), located in eastern Riverside County, California. The Proposed Action is part of a larger project, the Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project (FERC Project), licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) in 2014. The BLM is issuing a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) on the Proposed Action. The FERC Project would be located on approximately 1,150 acres of BLM-managed land and approximately 1,377 acres of private land. Of the 1,150 acres of BLM-managed land, 507 acres are in the 16-mile gen-tie line alignment; 154 acres are in the water supply pipeline alignment and other Proposed Action facilities outside the Central Project Area; and approximately 489 acres are lands within the Central Project Area of the hydropower project.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fault Line Threatening Dams
    The Fault Line Threatening Dams The Fault Line Threatening Dams Deficient structures, earthquake risks raise possibility of potentially catastrophic flooding By Jim Carlton June 24, 2017 FREMONT, Calif.-The coastal mountains that frame this working-class city next to San Francisco Bay harbor a hidden menace: a reservoir 10 miles away that sits next to an active earthquake fault, which experts say could cause a dam break and flood thousands of homes. The potential threat is so severe, the owner of the Calaveras Reservoir decided to build a replacement dam. But seven years after that work began, the dam is unfinished and isn't expected to be complete until 2019 -- four years behind schedule. The issues hampering the Calaveras Reservoir project show how difficult it can be to repair or replace an old dam, which is of growing concern nationally. An estimated 27,380 dams, or 30% of the 90,580 listed in the latest 2016 National Inventory of Dams, are rated as posing a high or significant hazard. Of those, more than 2,170 are considered deficient and in need of upgrading, according to a report by the American Society of Civil Engineers. The inventory by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers doesn't break out which ones are deficient. But funding and inspection staffing are considered inadequate, the civil engineers' report said. An estimated $64 billion is needed to upgrade those dams, including $22 billion for those posing the highest hazard, according to the Association of State Dam Safety Officials, a nonprofit group in Lexington, Ky. "It's a huge problem with limited resources," said Ivan Wong, a consulting seismologist from Walnut Creek, Calif., who works on dam projects nationally.
    [Show full text]
  • California Vegetation Map in Support of the DRECP
    CALIFORNIA VEGETATION MAP IN SUPPORT OF THE DESERT RENEWABLE ENERGY CONSERVATION PLAN (2014-2016 ADDITIONS) John Menke, Edward Reyes, Anne Hepburn, Deborah Johnson, and Janet Reyes Aerial Information Systems, Inc. Prepared for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Renewable Energy Program and the California Energy Commission Final Report May 2016 Prepared by: Primary Authors John Menke Edward Reyes Anne Hepburn Deborah Johnson Janet Reyes Report Graphics Ben Johnson Cover Page Photo Credits: Joshua Tree: John Fulton Blue Palo Verde: Ed Reyes Mojave Yucca: John Fulton Kingston Range, Pinyon: Arin Glass Aerial Information Systems, Inc. 112 First Street Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 793-9493 [email protected] in collaboration with California Department of Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program 1807 13th Street, Suite 202 Sacramento, CA 95811 and California Native Plant Society 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for this project was provided by: California Energy Commission US Bureau of Land Management California Wildlife Conservation Board California Department of Fish and Wildlife Personnel involved in developing the methodology and implementing this project included: Aerial Information Systems: Lisa Cotterman, Mark Fox, John Fulton, Arin Glass, Anne Hepburn, Ben Johnson, Debbie Johnson, John Menke, Lisa Morse, Mike Nelson, Ed Reyes, Janet Reyes, Patrick Yiu California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Diana Hickson, Todd Keeler‐Wolf, Anne Klein, Aicha Ougzin, Rosalie Yacoub California
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
    San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan October 2019 Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures.............................................................................................................................. ii Chapter 1: Governance ............................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Governance Team and Structure ...................................................... 1-1 1.2.1 Coordinating Committee ......................................................... 1-2 1.2.2 Stakeholders .......................................................................... 1-3 1.2.2.1 Identification of Stakeholder Types ....................... 1-4 1.2.3 Letter of Mutual Understandings Signatories .......................... 1-6 1.2.3.1 Alameda County Water District ............................. 1-6 1.2.3.2 Association of Bay Area Governments ................. 1-6 1.2.3.3 Bay Area Clean Water Agencies .......................... 1-6 1.2.3.4 Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency ................................................................. 1-8 1.2.3.5 Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District .................................. 1-8 1.2.3.6 Contra Costa Water District .................................. 1-9 1.2.3.7
    [Show full text]
  • Late Cenozoic Tectonics of the Central and Southern Coast Ranges of California
    OVERVIEW Late Cenozoic tectonics of the central and southern Coast Ranges of California Benjamin M. Page* Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2115 George A. Thompson† Department of Geophysics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2215 Robert G. Coleman Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2115 ABSTRACT within the Coast Ranges is ascribed in large Taliaferro (e.g., 1943). A prodigious amount of part to the well-established change in plate mo- geologic mapping by T. W. Dibblee, Jr., pre- The central and southern Coast Ranges tions at about 3.5 Ma. sented the areal geology in a form that made gen- of California coincide with the broad Pa- eral interpretations possible. E. H. Bailey, W. P. cific–North American plate boundary. The INTRODUCTION Irwin, D. L. Jones, M. C. Blake, and R. J. ranges formed during the transform regime, McLaughlin of the U.S. Geological Survey and but show little direct mechanical relation to The California Coast Ranges province encom- W. R. Dickinson are among many who have con- strike-slip faulting. After late Miocene defor- passes a system of elongate mountains and inter- tributed enormously to the present understanding mation, two recent generations of range build- vening valleys collectively extending southeast- of the Coast Ranges. Representative references ing occurred: (1) folding and thrusting, begin- ward from the latitude of Cape Mendocino (or by these and many other individuals were cited in ning ca. 3.5 Ma and increasing at 0.4 Ma, and beyond) to the Transverse Ranges. This paper Page (1981).
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment B-4 San Diego RWQCB Basin Plan Beneficial Uses
    Attachment B-4 San Diego RWQCB Basin Plan Beneficial Uses Regulatory_Issues_Trends.doc CHAPTER 2 BENEFICIAL USES INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................1 BENEFICIAL USES ..........................................................................................................................1 BENEFICIAL USE DESIGNATION UNDER THE PORTER-COLOGNE WATER QUALITY CONTROL ACT ..1 BENEFICIAL USE DESIGNATION UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT .................................................2 BENEFICIAL USE DEFINITIONS.........................................................................................................3 EXISTING AND POTENTIAL BENEFICIAL USES ..................................................................................7 BENEFICIAL USES FOR SPECIFIC WATER BODIES ........................................................................8 DESIGNATION OF RARE BENEFICIAL USE ...................................................................................8 DESIGNATION OF COLD FRESHWATER HABITAT BENEFICIAL USE ...............................................9 DESIGNATION OF SPAWNING, REPRODUCTION, AND/ OR EARLY DEVELOPMENT (SPWN) BENEFICIAL USE ...................................................................................................11 SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER POLICY ..................................................................................11 EXCEPTIONS TO THE "SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER" POLICY................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Interest and the Panamint Shoshone (E.G., Voegelin 1938; Zigmond 1938; and Kelly 1934)
    109 VyI. NOTES ON BOUNDARIES AND CULTURE OF THE PANAMINT SHOSHONE AND OWENS VALLEY PAIUTE * Gordon L. Grosscup Boundary of the Panamint The Panamint Shoshone, also referred to as the Panamint, Koso (Coso) and Shoshone of eastern California, lived in that portion of the Basin and Range Province which extends from the Sierra Nevadas on the west to the Amargosa Desert of eastern Nevada on the east, and from Owens Valley and Fish Lake Valley in the north to an ill- defined boundary in the south shared with Southern Paiute groups. These boundaries will be discussed below. Previous attempts to define the Panamint Shoshone boundary have been made by Kroeber (1925), Steward (1933, 1937, 1938, 1939 and 1941) and Driver (1937). Others, who have worked with some of the groups which border the Panamint Shoshone, have something to say about the common boundary between the group of their special interest and the Panamint Shoshone (e.g., Voegelin 1938; Zigmond 1938; and Kelly 1934). Kroeber (1925: 589-560) wrote: "The territory of the westernmost member of this group [the Shoshone], our Koso, who form as it were the head of a serpent that curves across the map for 1, 500 miles, is one of the largest of any Californian people. It was also perhaps the most thinly populated, and one of the least defined. If there were boundaries, they are not known. To the west the crest of the Sierra has been assumed as the limit of the Koso toward the Tubatulabal. On the north were the eastern Mono of Owens River.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Butte Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive River Management Plan Environmental Assessment
    Black Butte Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive River Management Plan Environmental Assessment Recreation & Visual Resource Report Prepared by: Shannon Pozas For: Covelo Ranger District Mendocino National Forest Service 1 August 2017 Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Project Description .............................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Purpose and Need................................................................................................................ 4 1.3 Overview of Issues & Issue Indicators ................................................................................... 4 1.4 Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.5 Mendocino National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan – LRMP .............................. 5 1.6 Forest Niche ....................................................................................................................... 5 2.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................................ 6 2.1 Black Butte River and Cold Creek Segments .......................................................................... 6 2.2 Recreation Opportunity Spectrum ...................................................................... 6 2.3 Visual Quality Objectives ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • March 21, 2014
    Welcome to the 32nd Annual Wild Flower Hotline, brought to you by the Theodore Payne Foundation, a non-profit plant nursery, seed source, book store, and education center dedicated to the preservation of wild flowers and California native plants. This a report for March 21, 2014. New reports will be posted each Friday through the end of May. The Mojave Desert is still the place to be this week, although I will include a few more good sights as many of you are starting Spring Break and may want to explore other areas as well. Let’s start with our first report from the Southern Sierra near Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks. The park region has had a dry season. Blooming appears to be early and short, but along Hwy 198 near Sequoia National Park look for Western redbud (Cercis occidentalis) in full bloom now. There have been spotty sightings of silver bush lupine (Lupinus albifrons) as well. There are bright orange patches of fiddleneck (Amsinckia menziesii) and the California poppies (Eschscholzia californica) are just starting to appear. Further north at Yosemite/Hetch Hetchy, flowers are starting to bloom, but it is still early in the season. Because of the Rim Fire last year, the only trail available is the one from the dam to Wapama and Rancheria Falls. (The trail to Poopenaut Valley is closed.) In the moist areas look for red maids (Calandrinia ciliata), and a few harlequin lupines (Lupinus stiversii), which are just getting started. Some of the larger pools of flowing water still contain Sierra newts (Taricha sierrae).
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTHEASTERN INYO Tt;OUNTAINS, CALIFORNIA
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE SUPERPOSED MESOZOIC DEFOR~~TIONS~ }) SOUTHEASTERN INYO tt;OUNTAINS, CALIFORNIA A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of 14aster of Science in Geology by Michael Robert Werner Janu(l.ry 3 i 979 The Thesis of Michael Robert Werner is approved: Or. L. Ehltg}rCSULA) Ca 1i forn i a State Un i vers ·j ty, Northridge ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ~1y respectful thanks to George Dunn£ for suggesting this study and for his helpful comments throughoutthe investigation. I am grateful also to Rick Miller and Perry Eh1ig VJho reviewed the manuscript in various stages of preparation. !'r1y special thanks to my parents for theit~ emotiona1 and 1ogistica·i support, and to Diane Evans who typed the first draft. Calvin Stevens and Duane Cavit, California State University~ San Jose, provided valuable information on stratigraphy; and Jean Ju11iand, geologist of the Desert Plan Staff, BLM, Riverside, made available aerial photographs of the study area.· The Department of Geosciences, California State University. Northridge pi·ovided computer time and financial support. Terry Dunn, CSUN, typed the fina1 manuscript. iii TAaLE OF CONTENTS p~~ ACKNOl~LEDGEHENTS. .. 111 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS . vi ABSTRACT ... vii. INTRODUCTION 1 METHOD • 3 ROCK UNITS •. 5 PALEOZOIC STRATIGRAPHY . 5 Perdido Formation 7 Rest Spring Shale . .. 3 Keeler Canyon Formation 10 Owens Vulley Formation 14 MESOZOIC INTRUSIVE ROCKS . 16 • Hunter Mountain batholith 16 Andes 'ite porphyry di kas 17 CENOZOIC UNITS . 18 STRUCTURJl.L GEOLOGY 19 FOLDS • ~ . 19 Introduction 19 Folds in the Nelson Range . 21 F., - The San Lucas Canyon syncline 2"1 j r2 - Northwest-trending folds 31 Folds aajacent to the Hunter Mountain batholith 37 Folds in the Southeastern Inyo r'Jounta·ins 43 Southwest-trending folds 43 Northwest-trending folds .
    [Show full text]
  • BLM Worksheets
    10 18 " 13 4 47 ! ! ! 47 " " 11 Piute Valley and Sacramento Mountains 54 " ! ! 87 12 ! 81 " 4 55 61 22 " ! " Pinto Lucerne Valley and Eastern Slopes ! 63 33 " 56 " " " 36 25 Colorado Desert " 20 ! " " 59 37 ! 2 ! 19 " ! 16 19 ! 56 21 " ! ! 15 27 ! 38 Arizona Lake Cahuilla 72 Lake Cahuilla 48 57 " ! ! 57 ! " 34 35 84 ! " 42 76 ! 26 41 ! " 0 5 10 14 58I Miles 28 " " 43 ! ! ! ! 8!9 Existing " Proposed DRECPSubareas 66 62 Colorado Desert Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP) ACECs within the Colorado Desert Subarea # Proposed ACECs 12 Cadiz Valley Chuckwalla Central 19 (covered in Chuckwalla, see below)) Chuckwalla Extension 20 (covered in Chuckwalla, see below) Chuckwalla Mountains Central 21 (covered in Corn Springs, see below) 22 Chuckwalla to Chemehuevi Tortoise Linkage Joshua Tree to Palen Corridor 33 (covered in Chuckwalla to Chemehuevi Tortoise Linkage) 36 McCoy Valley 37 McCoy Wash 38 Mule McCoy 44 Palen Ford Playa Dunes 48 Picacho Turtle Mountains Corridor 55 (covered in Chuckwalla to Chemehuevi Tortoise Linkage) 56 Upper McCoy # Existing ACECs (within DRECP boundary) 2 Alligator Rock 15 Chuckwalla 16 Chuckwalla Valley Dune Thicket 19 Corn Springs 25 Desert Lily Preserve 56 Mule Mountains 59 Palen Dry Lake 61 Patton's Iron Mountain Divisional Camp 81 Turtle Mountains Cadiz Valley Description/Location: North of Hwy 62, south of Hwy 40 between the Sheep Hole mountains to the west and the Chemehuevi ACEC to the east. Nationally Significant Values: Ecological: The Cadiz Valley contains an enormous variation of Mojave vegetation, from Ajo Lilies to Mojave Yucca. Bighorn, deer and mountain lion easily migrate between basin and range mountains of the Sheephole, Calumet Mountains, Iron Mountains, Kilbeck Hills and Old Woman Mountains with little or no human infrastructure limits.
    [Show full text]