EXEMPLARIA CLASSICA Journal of Classical Philology 23, 2019, xx-xx issn 1699-3225 A NEW COMMENTARY ON VIRGIL, AENEID BOOK 8* RICHARD TARRANT Harvard University
[email protected] Like the proverbial London buses, commentaries on Aeneid Book 8 seem to arrive in clusters separated by long intervals. The 1970s saw the nearly simultaneous appearance of commentaries by P. T. Eden (Brill, 1975), K. W. Gransden (Cambridge, 1976), and the posthumously published commentary of C. J. Fordyce (Oxford, 1977). The years 2017 and 2018 have likewise witnessed the publication of a trio of commentaries, by Keith Maclennan (London, 2017), James O’Hara (Indianapolis, 2018), and Lee Fratantuono and R. Alden Smith, the volume under review. Maclennan’s edition is specifically designed for use in schools and is therefore not comparable to the others, but in assessing the work of Fratantuono and Smith I have found it useful to set it against those four predecessors.1 This volume represents a second Virgilian collaboration between these scholars; only three years previously they published a commentary along similar lines on Book 5. The layout of that volume, the scale of the commentary, and even the place of publication inevitably prompted comparison with the commentaries on Books 2, 3, 7, and 11 by the late Nicholas Horsfall, a comparison that the authors incautiously encouraged by citing him as their primary inspiration among Virgilian commentators (p. viii). Horsfall responded with a furious denunciation in Scripta Classica Israelica 35 (2016), 143-6. Some of the features singled out for condemnation by Horsfall reappear in the present work, and other aspects of it also call for criticism, but I will aim to offer any negative comments in a dispassionate spirit.