Duffins Creek State of the Watershed Report Surface Water Quantity June 2002

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Duffins Creek State of the Watershed Report Surface Water Quantity June 2002 Duffins Creek State of the Watershed Report Surface Water Quantity June 2002 Other topics in this series for both the Duffins Creek and the Carruthers Creek include: Introduction Study Area Human Heritage Greenspace, Trails and Recreation Land Use Air Quality Climate Surface Water Quality Stormwater Management Fluvial Geomorphology Hydrogeology Aquatic Habitat and Species Terrestrial Natural Heritage Cover photographs: The beauty of Duffins Creek in winter. Photo credit: TRCA This document is intended to be shared for non-commercial use. We are promoting the electronic use of this document to minimize the consumption of paper resources. Toronto and Region Conservation, 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview, Ontario M3N 1S4 Telephone: (416) 661-6600 Fax: (416) 661-6898 www.trca.on.ca Table of Contents Introduction to Surface Water Quantity . .2 Current Conditions . .4 Physical Characteristics . .4 Watershed Response . .6 Stream Gauges . .7 Flooding . .9 Summary . .13 References . .14 Figures Figure 1: The Hydrologic Cycle . .3 Figure 2: Duffins Creek Watershed, Municipal Boundaries and Physiographic Regions . .5 Figure 3: Duffins Creek and the Don River, May 12/13, 2000 Storm Event . .7 Figure 4(i): Duffins Creek Annual Flow . .8 Figure 4(ii): Highland Creek Annual Flow . .8 Figure 5: Annual Flow Volumes of the Duffins Creek . .9 Figure 6: Stream Gauge Locations past, present and proposed . .10 Figure 7: TRCA Flood Vulnerable Areas Stage 5 . .12 1 Introduction to Surface Water Quantity Water quantity refers to the drainage of water through the Duffins Creek watershed under various rainfall and snowmelt conditions. There are many complex factors at play in determining the amount of precipitation that eventually ends up flowing in Duffins Creek. These factors include: soil types (with varying abilities to both hold and transfer water), topography, and land use. Obeying the laws of gravity, water above and below the ground surface flows down gradient eventually entering Lake Ontario at the Ajax waterfront. Figure 1 illustrates the linkages between the major water components of a watershed and the factors or processes controlling this movement of water. A significant component of the precipitation falling on the watershed cycles back into the atmosphere through evaporation or transpiration (moisture released by plants). When the land surface is impermeable (e.g. urban built and paved), surplus water runs directly towards depressions (i.e. ponds, swales, swamps) and streams or evaporates back into the atmosphere. On permeable soils, however, the runoff component of precipitation is very small. Water that remains after evapotranspiration drains overland or into the ground. The subsurface movement of water begins the complex sequence of events associated with the groundwater flow system. In managing the Duffins Creek watershed, great care is taken to ensure a natural balance to the movement of water. The study of the movement of water through the hydrologic cycle is an important element of our conservation work in the watershed. In the same manner, as one manages household or business finances, the amount of water flowing through the watershed is carefully accounted for in a water budget. As a result, the monitoring of precipitation, along with surface and groundwater levels, is an essential component of water quantity management in the Duffins Creek. 2 Figure 1: The Hydrologic Cycle. Adapted from the Oshawa Creek Watershed Management Plan, Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority (2001) and Gerber (1999). Human uses of the watershed can have significant impacts on all of the components of the water cycle, thus altering the water budget. Changes in the volumes and pathways of surface water flowing in the Duffins Creek can alter the size and shape of stream channels, the stability of streambanks, and dependent fish and wildlife habitats. Reductions in groundwater flow systems can have serious consequences to wetlands and aquatic communities (e.g., brook trout) and rural domestic groundwater supplies. 3 Claremont. The southern limit of the till plain is Current marked by steep topographic gradients, which Conditions define the former shoreline of Lake Iroquois. The Lake Iroquois Shoreline is located near the The Duffins Creek watershed, shown in Figure 2, 5th Concession Road which cuts across Pickering is 283 km2 in size and is located east of Toronto and serves as the northern boundary where Ajax within the Regional Municipalities of York and meets Pickering. Approximately 12,800 years Durham. Local municipalities include the City of ago, glacial Lake Iroquois occupied the Lake Pickering, Town of Ajax, Town of Whitchurch- Ontario basin at a time when the Wisconsinan Stouffville, Township of Uxbridge and Town of glacier blocked the St. Lawrence outlet and Markham. water drained to the south-west. The glacial meltwaters overflowed the banks of this basin, so In 1991, The Toronto and Region Conservation that the waters filled what is now the lower third Authority (TRCA) retained Aquafor-Beech of the Duffins watershed. The Lake Iroquois Engineering Limited to undertake a hydrology Shoreline appears today as an irregular line study. This study is currently being updated by broken by strongly developed features such as Aquafor-Beech Engineering. embayments and river mouths, remnants of the once coastal environment. The wave action from Physical Characteristics the waters of this glacial lake deposited boulder pavement or beach gravels along the shoreline The Duffins Creek watershed can be divided into (Chapman and Putnum, 1984). four physiographic regions with distinct topography, soil conditions and range of land surface elevations. The Lake Iroquois Plain is located in the bottom These four physiographic regions include: third of the watershed and consists primarily of a gently rolling till plain. Soils in this region consist the Oak Ridges Moraine of a mixture of clay, silt and sand deposits, overlaying the Halton Till Plain the Halton Till. These stone-free lacustrine the Lake Iroquois Shoreline (lake-bottom) soils are fertile and suitable for the Lake Iroquois Plain horticulture and have typically fared well for orchard crops. The largest relief is provided by The Oak Ridges Moraine is located in the the deeply incised valleys of Duffins Creek. northern third of the watershed. This region is the headwaters of the Duffins Creek watershed, Duffins Creek has two major branches which join and is a distinctive area of high ridges and approximately one kilometre upstream of sand/gravel hills. Highway 2. The west branch originates northeast of Whitchurch-Stouffville and drains an area of The Halton Till Plain is centrally located in the approximately 135 km2. The east branch originates watershed. Topography is predominantly gently northeast of Claremont in the Oak Ridges Moraine rolling, low-relief hills with the largest relief and drains an area of approximately 143 km2. produced by the incised major stream valleys. Both the east and west branches have a number Sometimes refered to as the south slope of the of tributaries including the following: moraine, the Halton Till Plan contains a variety of soils, some of which have proven to be excellent West Duffins Creek through more than a century of agricultural use. Stouffville Creek Several large areas with surficial clay deposits are Reesor Creek located between Whitchurch-Stouffville and Wixon Creek 4 Figure 2 Duffins Creek Watershed, Municipal Boundaries and Physiographic Regions. 5 East Duffins Creek has happened with other watersheds that are Mitchell Creek mostly urban. The Duffins Creek watershed is one Brougham Creek of the last watersheds within TRCAs jurisdiction Urfe Creek to exhibit this annual response. Figures 4(i) and Ganatsekiagon Creek 4(ii) illustrate the differences in annual flow that occurred in 1991 for the Duffins Creek and the highly urbanized Highland Creek watershed. Millers Creek, which originates in the lower eastern The relatively rural Duffins Creek watershed was section of the watercourse, drains a 17 hectare area able to absorb much of the annual moisture. In and joins the main branch between Highway 2 comparison, the highly urbanized Highland and Highway 401. The lower reaches of this 2 Creek watershed has a drainage area of 102 km , watercourse through Ajax have been channelized. of which 85 per cent of the total area is impervious. During a rain or melt event, the surface water In general, watercourse gradients north of runoff is virtually immediate, as evidenced by the Highway 2 are relatively steep and in the order of spikes in Figure 4(ii). one to two per cent. Downstream of Highway 2, watercourse gradients are mild and range from One way of understanding how a watershed 0.1 to 0.5 per cent. responds to changes over time in land use, management practices and precipitation is to Watershed Response plot measurements of total annual runoff. Flow data plotted in Figure 5 indicates that there have The rural nature of the Duffins Creek watershed not been significant charges in the Duffins Creek is clearly demonstrated by the hydraulic response watershed to result in a change in flow volumes. of the basin. This response was specifically observed during a large rainfall event of 50-60 mm that Figure 5 represents the change over time occurred on May 13, 2000. The Duffins Creek associated with the total volume of surface water took approximately 13 hours to peak with flows flow of the Duffins Creek watershed at the ranging from 5-83 cubic metres per second from historical stream gauge locations in the Highway 2 the beginning of the storm to the peak discharge, to Highway 401 reach. As can be seen in Figure respectively. In comparison, an urban watershed 5, the data charted indicate a flat trend line, (the Don River) of similar shape and only a slightly showing that the hydrologic response of the larger drainage area, peaked in approximately Duffins Creek watershed has not been altered 4-5 hours, with flows more than double those of appreciably enough at this point to reflect a change.
Recommended publications
  • PICKERING AIRPORT DRAFT PLAN the Planning and Economic Development Committee Recommends the Following: 1. the Deputation by Stev
    Report No. 4 of the Planning and Economic Development Committee Regional Council Meeting of April 21, 2005 7 PICKERING AIRPORT DRAFT PLAN The Planning and Economic Development Committee recommends the following: 1. The deputation by Steve Shaw, Vice-President, Corporate Affairs and Communications, Greater Toronto Airport Authority be received; and 2. The recommendations contained in the following report, March 10, 2005, from the Commissioner of Planning and Development Services be adopted: 1. RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that: 1. Regional staff continue to work with Durham Region and Greater Toronto Airports Authority staff to study and coordinate transportation and servicing impacts of the proposed Pickering airport. 2. Staff submit a subsequent report commenting further on the issues set out in Section 4 of this report at a future meeting of Planning Committee. 3. The Regional Clerk forward a copy of this report to the Greater Toronto Airport Authority, Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Region of Durham, Transport Canada, Town of Markham, and Town of Whitchurh-Stouffville. 2. PURPOSE This report highlights the contents of the Draft Plan for the proposed Pickering airport released by the Greater Toronto Airport Authority (GTAA) in November 2004. The report also identifies York Region’s issues with respect to Growth Management resulting from recent Provincial forecasts, the Provincial Greenbelt Plan, and the need to ensure transportation and servicing infrastructure is in place to serve approved planned growth in both York and Durham Regions. 3. BACKGROUND The Pickering Airport lands consist of approximately 7,530 ha (18,600 acres) located within the City of Pickering, Town of Markham and Township of Uxbridge (see Attachment No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rouge Uncovered: Community Participation, Urban Agriculture and Power Dynamics in the Creation of Canada’S First National Urban Park
    The Rouge Uncovered: Community Participation, Urban Agriculture and Power Dynamics in the Creation of Canada’s first National Urban Park by Jina Gill, B.A. (Hons.) A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Geography and Planning University of Toronto © Copyright by Jina Gill 2017 The Rouge Uncovered: Community Participation, Urban Agriculture and Power Dynamics in the creation of Canada’s first National Urban Park Jina Gill Master of Arts Department of Geography and Planning University of Toronto 2017 Abstract Local food production has been a defining goal of a healthy and resilient food system. In 2011 the Canadian government and Parks Canada committed to creating Canada’s first national urban park. The space in which land is used to undertake conservation efforts and develop sustainable farming is often associated with inequalities of larger society; whereby hegemonic practices of inclusion and exclusion are produced and/or reinforced. By employing an Environmental Justice framework this thesis investigates if and how small-scale farmers and community members have been included in the creation of the park, and how power, particularly in relation to the axis of difference, influences green space planning, local farming and sustainability in the Greater Toronto Area. Findings show extreme contention between farmers and environmentalists over productive parkland use and definitions of ecological integrity. This research also discloses the need for a more inclusive approach to community participation processes in green space planning and management. ii Acknowledgments I would like to extend my sincerest thanks to my supervisor, Dr. Sarah Wakefield.
    [Show full text]
  • Crash Landing: Citizens, the State and Protest Against Federal Airport Development, 1968- 1976
    Crash Landing: Citizens, The State and Protest Against Federal Airport Development, 1968- 1976 ii Crash Landing: Citizens, The State and Protest Against Federal Airport Development, 1968- 1976 By Michael Rowan, B.A., M.A. Supervisor: Dr. Ken Cruikshank Committee Members: Dr. Richard Harris, Dr. John Weaver, Dr. Penny Bryden A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy McMaster University © Copyright by Michael Rowan, January 2019. iii McMaster University DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (2018) Hamilton, Ontario (History) TITLE: Crash Landing: Citizens, The State and Protest Against Federal Airport Development, 1968-1976 AUTHOR: Michael Rowan, B.A. (York University), M.A. (York University) PROFESSOR: Ken Cruikshank NUMBER OF PAGES 206 iv Abstract During the 1960s both the federal and provincial governments continued to take on new and larger responsibilities. During this same time period citizens began to mobilize and challenge the state on a number of social issues including race, gender, labour, urban sprawl and the environment. Citizens believed that not only did they have the right to challenge the authority of government in planning public policy, but they also had a right to participate in the decision- making process as much as any bureaucrat, expert, or elected official. In planning airports in Pickering, Ste. Scholastique and Sea Island, the federal government was opposed by citizen groups in each of these three cases. Citizens believed their voices were not being heard and that government officials did not respect them. As a result, they disrupted the meticulously laid out plans of elected officials and policy planners by drawing on evidence and expert advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Greater Toronto Airports Authority “Needs Assessment Study - Pickering Lands” Implications for General Aviation in the Greater Golden Horseshoe, Ontario
    Review of the Greater Toronto Airports Authority “Needs Assessment Study - Pickering Lands” Implications for General Aviation in the Greater Golden Horseshoe, Ontario Prepared By: Prepared For: CANADIAN OWNERS AND PILOTS ASSOCIATION September, 2011 Review of the Greater Toronto Airports Authority “Needs Assessment Study - Pickering Lands” Implications for General Aviation in the Greater Golden Horseshoe, Ontario Prepared By: Prepared For: Malone Given Parsons Ltd. Canadian Owners and Pilots Association 140 Renfrew Drive, Suite 201 71 Bank St, 7th Floor Markham, Ontario Ottawa, Ontario L3R 6B3 K1P 5N2 In Association With: AeroCan Aviation Specialists Inc. 7 Kingfisher Cove Way Markham Ontario L6E 1B4 September 2011 11-2033 REVIEW OF THE GREATER TORONTO AIRPORTS AUTHORITY “NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY - PICKERING LANDS” TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................... V 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................... 1 1.1 General Aviation Defined .......................................................... 3 1.2 Limitations of the General Aviation System in Toronto ........... 3 2.0 THE FUTURE DEMAND FOR GENERAL AVIATION IN THE GTA ................................................................ 5 2.1 The Air System Capacity for General Aviation ........................ 5 2.2 Current and Future Capacity ..................................................... 6 2.3 Interview Results .......................................................................... 8 John C. Munro Hamilton International
    [Show full text]
  • AECOM Report 1.Dot
    DRAFT Comprehensive Study Report Pursuant to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act for the proposed 407 East Transportation Corridor (October, 2010) Prepared by: AECOM 300 – 300 Town Centre Boulevard 905 477 8400 tel Markham, ON, Canada L3R 5Z6 905 477 1456 fax www.aecom.com Project Number: 60117936 Date: October, 2010 AECOM Ontario Ministry of Transportation DRAFT Comprehensive Study Report Pursuant to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act for the proposed 407 East Transportation Corridor (October, 2010) Executive Summary ES.1 Background The Ontario Ministry of Transportation (MTO) is proposing the construction and operation of the 407 East Transportation Corridor project, an extension of the existing 407 transportation corridor from its current terminus at Brock Road in Pickering to Highway 35/115 in Clarington, including two north-south links connecting Highway 401 to the proposed extension of 407, one in West Durham (Whitby) and the other in East Durham (Clarington). The transportation corridor includes a highway component and a transitway component (i.e. a dedicated corridor for transit). The MTO is the project proponent for the 407 East Transportation Corridor Project (the Project). ES.2 Purpose of this Draft Comprehensive Study Report The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (CEA Agency) has delegated the preparation of this draft Comprehensive Study report, and certain procedural aspects of public participation in its development, to the MTO. The purpose of this draft Comprehensive Study report is to provide, from the proponent’s perspective, the information, analysis and conclusions relevant to an eventual determination by the federal Minister of Environment on the likely significance of adverse environmental effects from the project.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2017 NEWSLETTER
    November 2017 NEWSLETTER “A national organization dedicated to promoting the viability of Regional and Community Airports across Canada” www.rcacc.ca RCAC MEMBER AIRPORT PROFILE: Vernon Regional Airport (CYVK), BC JJul Initially, the airport was located south of the city at the Vernon Army Cadet Camp. The camp parade square and baseball field now occupy the exact spot. During the second war, general aviation was grounded by the Federal Government. The airport was taken over by the military for training. When the war ended, the airport was relocated to the farmlands of Okanagan Landing. The airport was a grass field approximately half the length it is today. Jj The Vernon Flying Club was the sole tenant of the airport during the late forties and early fifties. There were only four aircraft based on the field. The 1,200′ X 12′ runway was eventually paved. The two-inch thick pavement was laid over four inches of gravel. The city hangar was built during the early 1950’s, and airport usage grew during the 60’s and 70’s. The strong economy of the 1970’s saw close to eighty aircraft located on the field. Operation then was a regional district function. The runway (07-25) had been extended westward onto Indian Reserve property giving 2200 feet, but it was still only twelve feet wide. The airport remained basically unchanged until 1988 when the present runway was built. The Flying Club and Okanagan Aviation were the primary forces behind this development. And when the city limits were expanded to include Okanagan Landing, the airport fell under the authority of the City of Vernon.
    [Show full text]
  • Realjobsnow-FINAL
    Better still... Real Jobs Now! Response to “Jets & Jobs: Summary of Findings from the Targeted Stakeholder Consultations by the Independent Advisor on the Economic Development of the Pickering Lands” January 1, 2017 1 General Observations What did the consultations glean? Very little that wasn’t already known. For those familiar with the Pickering airport file, this should come as no surprise. The same words, arguments, concerns, conflicting opinions, misconceptions, hopes, and aspirations can be found, in an unbroken thread, in headlines, articles, letters to editors, council resolutions, reports, and interviews spanning the entire 44 years (and counting) since the 1972 airport announcement. Why the report at all, then? The Harper government was on the cusp of calling an election and clearly believed the appearance of action on the airport file could be useful to the campaign. The original Pickering plan, after all, dates all the way back to the tenure of Trudeau père. Transport Canada was tasked with commissioning two studies – a needs analysis (begun this year by KPMG and not due to be completed until 2018) and a “what if ?” stakeholder consultation, essentially an opinion-gathering exercise on potential uses for the remaining Lands. “Jets & Jobs” is the result. It’s important to note that while the needs analysis is just the latest in a series of similar studies, the “potential uses” consultation was unique. It’s also important to note that it was announced as an independent undertaking. But “independent” – exempt from external control or support [OED] – was a bit of a misnomer. The Independent Advisor was selected and appointed by Transport Canada, briefed by Transport Canada, paid by Transport Canada; Transport Canada wrote the background notes, drafted the discussion questionnaire, drew up the list of stakeholders to interview; Transport Canada provided the meeting rooms and the note-taker, reviewed the draft report, and (we can be sure) intervened in its contents before release of the final version.
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities to Grow Southern Ontario's Fruit
    Plant the Seeds: Opportunities to Grow Southern Ontario’s Fruit & Vegetable Sector JRG Consulting Group Greenbelt Foundation Occasional Papers March 2020 Copyright © 2020 Greenbelt Foundation All Rights Reserved Greenbelt Foundation 661 Yonge Street, Suite 500 Toronto, Ontario M4Y 1Z9 Canada Tel (416) 960-0001 Fax (416) 960-0030 [email protected] www.greenbelt.ca ISSN 1912-4171 Greenbelt Foundation Occasional Paper Series (Print) ISSN 1912-418X Greenbelt Foundation Occasional Paper Series (Online) The Greenbelt Foundation is committed to promoting awareness and education about Ontario’s Greenbelt. To this end we occasionally publish research and general interest papers that explore our three program areas: viable agriculture and viticulture; vibrant rural communities; and, a restored and protected natural environment. Plant the Seeds: Opportunities to Grow Southern Ontario’s Fruit & Vegetable Sector Prepared by JRG Consulting Group ISBN 978-1-927075-16-6 The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors only and do not necessarily represent the views of the Greenbelt Foundation, their Officers or Directors. We have done our best to confirm that all facts and figures are accurate. However, we do not retain liability for any errors or misrepresentations. Acknowledgments The Greenbelt Foundation would like to thank the members of our Advisory Committee for their valuable input and insight: Alison Robertson, Erin Atchison, Janet Horner, Jason Bent, and Stephen Duff. Titles in the Greenbelt Foundation Occasional Paper
    [Show full text]
  • Pickering Airport Study Why Invest in Pickering?
    Regional Municipality of Durham Pickering Airport Study Why Invest in Pickering? Prepared by: AECOM Canada Ltd. 300 Water Street Whitby, ON L1N 9J2 Canada T: 905 668 9363 F: 905 668 0221 www.aecom.com Date: May 30, 2018 Project #: 60562615 Statement of Qualifications and Limitations The attached Report (the “Report”) has been prepared by AECOM Canada Ltd. (“AECOM”) for the benefit of the Client (“Client”) in accordance with the agreement between AECOM and Client, including the scope of work detailed therein (the “Agreement”). The information, data, recommendations and conclusions contained in the Report (collectively, the “Information”): . is subject to the scope, schedule, and other constraints and limitations in the Agreement and the qualifications contained in the Report (the “Limitations”); . represents AECOM’s professional judgement in light of the Limitations and industry standards for the preparation of similar reports; . may be based on information provided to AECOM which has not been independently verified; . has not been updated since the date of issuance of the Report and its accuracy is limited to the time period and circumstances in which it was collected, processed, made or issued; . must be read as a whole and sections thereof should not be read out of such context; . was prepared for the specific purposes described in the Report and the Agreement; and . in the case of subsurface, environmental or geotechnical conditions, may be based on limited testing and on the assumption that such conditions are uniform and not variable either geographically or over time. AECOM shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy and completeness of information that was provided to it and has no obligation to update such information.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Urban Structure
    ASSESSMENT OF THE URBAN STRUCTURE A Technical Background Report for the York Region Transportation Master Plan ((forfor discussion purposes only) prepared by HEMSON CONSULTING November 2000 CANSULT/MARSHALL MACKLIIN MONAGHAN JOIINT VENTURE in association with Cumming + Company Hemson Consulting Dalton Consulting CONSULTING ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS R.M. Soberman 1 INTRODUCTION The Region of York is undertaking a Transportation Master Plan Study to define a long-term transportation vision and plan for the Region. As background information to the preparation of the vision and plan, the existing and planned urban structure of the Region needs to be understood in order to develop a transportation strategy that will support the anticipated population and employment growth in the Region. This background report complements a series of eight policy papers being prepared as an initial step in assessing the current state of the urban structure and transportation system in York Region. This report addresses a number of growth and urban structure issues in York Region. The paper is structured into five sections, addressing the following: • Historical population and employment growth patterns and trends; • Description of the existing urban structure; • Existing and future residential areas in the Region and the 2026 population forecast prepared by the Region; • Type and location of employment areas in the Region and the forecast employment to 2026; • Outline of the regional urban structure policies that are in place in the York Region Official Plan and assessment of the Region’s progress towards these goals to date. A. YORK REGION CONTINUES TO EXPERIENCE RAPID POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT GROWTH Established in 1971, the Region of York is one of the fastest growing regions in Ontario and Canada both in terms of population and employment.
    [Show full text]
  • John Henry, Chair April 8, 2021 Durham Regional Council 605 Rossland Road East Whitby, Ontario L1N 6A3
    4560 Sideline 22, R.R. #5, Claremont ON L1Y 1A2 / [email protected] / 905-649-2433 John Henry, Chair April 8, 2021 Durham Regional Council 605 Rossland Road East Whitby, Ontario L1N 6A3 Dear Mr Henry, I am writing with regard to the posting of March 9, 2020, on Durham Region’s website. The post, about a Pickering airport, is seriously misleading, announcing conclusions that KPMG did not reach and featuring claims that the report did not contain. More than a full pandemic year after the appearance of this post, the inaccuracies are still there and have become increasingly objectionable. It is dishonest for the Region to mischaracterize KPMG’s conclusions and then use that mischaracterization to imply that the airport is a certainty. It is not. In 2020, the aviation sector was already widely viewed as being on a collision course with climate change – and that was before COvID -19 surfaced and sent it into a tailspin. There is still no clarity as to when a global post-pandemic recovery will start, how long it will take, and how different the world will be in its wake. In the past twelve months, airlines have gone bankrupt, hundreds of airports around the world have faltered or been shuttered, and many expansion plans have been cancelled or have failed to attract investors. COvID -19 was often the cause, but so was the growing realization that greenhouse-gas emissions must be tackled seriously and swiftly as the climate emergency intensifies. In short, it is deceptive of Durham Region to imply that a Pickering airport is a foregone conclusion (it is not) and that KPMG recommended a Pickering airport to Transport Canada (they did not).
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Pickering's Indigenous History
    RESEARCH PAPER 10 Protecting Pickering’s Indigenous History November 2017 1 Introduction During a Land Over Landings meeting with area MPs on August 15, 2016, Health Minister Dr Jane Philpott asked how many Indigenous sites were on the remaining Federal Lands. She indicated that the government was very interested in Indigenous issues. If there were several Indigenous sites on the Lands, this knowledge would bolster the argument for protecting the remaining Federal Lands from further urban development, including a potential future airport. We replied that we thought there were Indigenous sites “everywhere” but had no proof. Information on the locations of unguarded archaeological sites was not available to the general public, to prevent site disturbance. Since that meeting and the Minister’s question, we have collected some interesting information. 1 2 Data Obtained on the Lands Expropriated for an Airport (18,600 acres) In Ontario, all archaeological sites are registered by the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport. Archaeological exploration of the Lands started after expropriation for Pickering airport, and was quite active for a few years. In 1976, the federal government stopped funding major archaeological work. 1 A 1979 survey report stated that 126 archaeological sites had been discovered on the Lands to that date. 2 There were few archaeological discoveries over the next three decades. By 2004, the number of registered archaeological sites had increased by only ten, to 136. 3 3 Data Obtained on the Remaining Federal Lands (9,600 acres) By May 15, 2017, the federal government had announced that nearly half of the lands expropriated for an airport had been made part of the Rouge National Urban Park.
    [Show full text]