Scriptietgjorna Pages

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Scriptietgjorna Pages ! Masterscriptie Wijsbegeerte Faculteit der Geesteswetenschappen September 2014 ! ! Oikeiôsis en Apatheia De spanning tussen sociale verbondenheid en individuele autonomie bij de Stoa. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! T.G. Jorna Studentnummer: 5689929 ! ! Begeleider: dhr. prof. dr. R.A. te Velde Tweede lezer: dhr. dr. J. Bos ! ! ! ! ! Hoofdstuk 1: Inleiding 4 Ter introductie: hoe ver reikt onze empathie? 4 Een negatieve verklaring (Hobbes) 5 De positieve drang tot gemeenschap 5 Kosmopolitische ideeën 7 Vraagstelling, opbouw en oplossing 8 Hoofdstuk 2: De Stoïcijnse filosofie 11 De Stoïcijnen 11 Fysica en kosmologie 12 Pneuma 14 Hêgemonikon 15 Pathos 17 Instemmen met een mentale impressie 18 Verantwoordelijkheid voor onkwetsbaarheid 19 Eph’hemin 20 Fysica, verbondenheid en het uitbannen van emoties 21 Hoofdstuk 3: Oikeiôsis 23 Algemene omschrijving van oikeiôsis 24 Oorsprong van oikeiôsis bij de Stoïcijnen 25 Natuurlijke impuls naar zelfbehoud 26 Oikeiôsis en logos, zelfbehoud 28 Oikeiôsis en de ander 31 Hierocles 33 Afsluiting 36 Conclusie 36 Epiloog: Obama en Hierocles 40 Bijlage: Kosmopolitisme van Zeno 44 Zeno de cynicus? 44 Een stad met alleen maar sophos? 46 Zeno maakt de eerste stap 47 Bibliografie 50 !2 ! ! ! ‘Homo res sacra homini’ - De mens is iets heiligs voor de mens. - Lucius Annaeus Seneca (Epistulae morales ad Lucilium, 65 n. Chr) ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !3 Hoofdstuk 1: Inleiding Ter introductie: hoe ver reikt onze empathie? ! Barack Obama formuleerde in 2006, in een toespraak voor de afgestudeerde studenten van de ‘Nordwestern University’, een probleem dat hij the empathy deficit noemde; een nijpende kwestie in de ogen van de toenmalige senator. Je hebt als mens de mogelijkheid om je leven en identiteit vorm te geven en te spiegelen aan de hand van een kleine gemeenschap, maar je kunt ook een denkbeeldige cirkel vergroten naar een ruimere identiteit, of een grotere groep waaraan je verwant bent. “As you go on in life, cultivating this quality of empathy will become harder, not easier. There's no community service requirement in the real world; no one forcing you to care. You'll be free to live in neighbourhoods with people who are exactly like yourself, and send your kids to the same schools, and narrow your concerns to what's going in your own little circle.”1 ! Verbondenheid ervaren met een grotere groep, dat is volgens Obama de kwestie waar het om gaat. Een serieuze vraag naar empathie, en daarbij de vraag naar een leven waarin persoonlijke drijfveren en standpunten niet alleen rekening houden met je directe omgeving. Een vraag naar een empathisch vermogen dat zich uitstrekt naar een grotere, misschien wel wereldwijde, gemeenschap. Door technologische ontwikkelingen en de komst van het internet komen we makkelijker in contact met andere mensen, uit andere culturen en met andere ideeën. Dit maakt dus ook dat het persoonlijk leed van andere mensen over de hele wereld zichtbaar voor ons is. De pijn van de ander is moeilijk te negeren. Culturele verschillen maken soms plaats voor het gevoel dat we allemaal mens zijn. Maar volgens Obama is de uitbreiding van empathie naar verder weg liggende groepen van mensen een moeilijk proces, iets dat gecultiveerd en nagestreefd moet worden. ! Toen de orkaan Haiyan in November 2013 de Filipijnen trof waren er binnen enkele uren al duizenden Twitter en Facebook berichten wereldwijd, na nog geen dag waren wereldwijd miljoenen mensen bereid om hulp te bieden. Het verdriet beperkte zich niet alleen tot de mensen op de Filipijnen. De hele wereld was aangedaan en leefde mee. Alle eventuele 1 B. Obama, speech Nordwestern University, Juni 2006 http://www.northwestern.edu/ newscenter/stories/2006/06/barack.html November 2013 !4 culturele verschillen tussen de hulp biedende landen en de Filipijnen worden als niet relevant ervaren. Ook de geografische afstanden tussen de landen is niet van belang. ! Een negatieve verklaring (Hobbes) ! Tijdens heftige momenten ervaart de mens een spontaan gevoel van verbondenheid. Het lijden van mensen, die buiten de directe omgeving van de eigen kring staan, wordt gevoeld. Je vormde, tijdens zo een heftige ramp, even een gemeenschap waarbinnen leed gedeeld wordt en ervaren wordt dat iedereen, net als jij, mens is. Wat maakt het mogelijk om met vreemden aan de andere kant van de wereld een gemeenschap te ervaren? Hoe komt het daarentegen dat we soms vergeten dat we allemaal tot één wereld behoren? Een gangbare verklaring voor de sociale drang van de mens tot gemeenschapsvorming kunnen we vinden bij bepaalde filosofen uit de Verlichting. Dankzij georganiseerde gemeenschappen leven wij niet meer in de natuurtoestand, een toestand waarin er door een gebrek aan een staatsvorm of organisatie een zekere chaos ontstaat. Zonder sociale structuur en een politieke orde zal het individu voor zichzelf kiezen, en zijn eigen belang nastreven, zo wordt gesteld. Als iedereen zijn eigen belang nastreeft ontstaan er moeilijk te beheersen conflicten tussen mensen. Een gemeenschap, met een de daarbij behorende leider is een uitweg uit deze chaos. “Homo homini lupus est” - De mens is voor andere mensen een wolf zou Thomas Hobbes stellen.2 Het sociale vermogen van empathie, het zich kunnen verplaatsen in een ander, is in deze visie geen oorspronkelijk kenmerk van de mens.3 ! De positieve drang tot gemeenschap ! Volgens een andere opvatting is de mens wel gekenmerkt door een positieve drang naar gemeenschapsvorming. Deze positie gaat uit van de empathische mens. Het is voor de mens natuurlijk en goed om samen te leven en rekening te houden met wat de ander overkomt. Honderden jaren geleden was dit besef er al. Mensen zijn door de eeuwen heen steeds grotere gemeenschappen gaan vormen. Dit heeft er echter niet per se voor gezorgd dat de contrasten 2 Hobbes, De Cive (1651) 3 In de laatste tientallen jaren zijn er interessante ontwikkelingen geweest in evolutionaire biologie, neurowetenschappen en ook in de filosofie, die het niet empathisch mensbeeld in twijfel trekken. Deze ontwikkelingen kunnen van grote invloed zijn op de manier waarop wij menselijk handelen uitleggen. Een voorbeeld van een interessant onderzoek is de ontdekking van spiegelneuronen. Tevens het onderzoek van Frans de Waal naar empathie bij apen is interessant. !5 tussen de verschillende gemeenschappen kleiner zijn geworden. Ik gebruik het woord gemeenschap nu in de brede betekenis van het woord. Zoals dat gebruikt wordt in termen als: een geloofsgemeenschap of Europese gemeenschap. De grootst mogelijke gemeenschap is een universele gemeenschap, een wereldwijde gemeenschap van alle mensen ongeacht alle verschillen die tussen mensen bestaan. Het kosmopolitisme is op dit ideaal gebaseerd, een wereldwijde gemeenschap waarin een ieder zich lid voelt van deze gemeenschap. Hiermee wordt bedoeld dat iedere feitelijke gemeenschap (in politieke zin) gezien moet worden in het licht van een ideële en omvattende gemeenschap van alle mensen. Ik wil in het vervolg gemeenschapsvorming koppelen aan een bepaald vermogen, een bepaald streven. De geschiedenis leert ons dat mensen in gemeenschappen leven, en dat in de loop van de tijd deze gemeenschappen steeds omvattender worden. Er is sprake van een groeiende erkenning van gemeenschappelijkheid en verbondenheid tussen mensen. De (laat) prehistorische mens, gekenmerkt door de zeer kleine gemeenschappen van jagers en verzamelaars, had slechts contact binnen die zelfde kleine gemeenschap. De inwoners van het dorpje aan de andere kant van de rivier waren vreemdelingen. De gemeenschap bestond in deze situatie waarschijnlijk alleen op basis van directe of indirecte familie verbanden. Immers, men wist nauwelijks dat er andere, op hun gelijkende, mensen waren. Vanaf dit moment start er een ontwikkeling, gemeenschappen worden groter. Vooral dankzij de ontdekking van het schrift werden mensen meer tot elkaar gebracht. Associatie bestaat nu niet alleen meer in bloedverwanten maar tijdens de stroomculturen (rond 3500 v.Chr) bestaat associatie reeds met elkaar op religieuze basis. Dit ontwikkelde zich verder, in en na de klassieke oudheid zien bijvoorbeeld Christenen andere Christenen als verlengde familie en vormen in die zin een gemeenschap. Een gemeenschap is gefundeerd op een overtuiging of gemeenschappelijk kenmerk dat de mensen verbindt. De Christelijke gemeenschap voelt verbondenheid om ze allemaal God als vader in de hemel ervaren. Maar er zijn meerdere manieren om verbondenheid te voelen. Dankzij de industriële revolutie kunnen we onze markten vergroten en ontstaat er een sterker idee van de natiestaat. Alle Nederlanders zien andere Nederlanders als medemens. Terwijl natiestaten eigenlijk redelijk abstracte entiteiten zijn, die eerst slechts ficties waren, maar die echter door de jaren heen steeds meer als werkelijke verbondenheid tussen mensen zijn gaan gelden. Er is een gevoel van sociale verbondenheid mogelijk op basis van allerlei verschillende ‘gemeenschappelijke’ overeenkomsten. De bondigheid van het voorgaande doet geen recht aan de complexiteit van dergelijke historische ontwikkelingen, maar het is voldoende om bloot te leggen dat verbondenheid tot een groep of persoon niet iets is dat statisch is. We identificeren ons met telkens grotere groepen. Maar op basis van wat voor associatie met de ander is een gemeenschap an sich te verklaren? Deze vraag is lastig te beantwoorden en leidt tot meer !6 vragen. Het zijn juist dit soort vragen die de probleemstelling van mijn betoog zijn. Waarom zou ik mij verbonden moeten voelen met een groep mensen, ook als deze mensen zowel
Recommended publications
  • Stoic Enlightenments
    Copyright © 2011 Margaret Felice Wald All rights reserved STOIC ENLIGHTENMENTS By MARGARET FELICE WALD A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in English written under the direction of Michael McKeon and approved by ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey October 2011 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Stoic Enlightenments By MARGARET FELICE WALD Dissertation Director: Michael McKeon Stoic ideals infused seventeenth- and eighteenth-century thought, not only in the figure of the ascetic sage who grins and bears all, but also in a myriad of other constructions, shaping the way the period imagined ethical, political, linguistic, epistemological, and social reform. My dissertation examines the literary manifestation of Stoicism’s legacy, in particular regarding the institution and danger of autonomy, the foundation and limitation of virtue, the nature of the passions, the difference between good and evil, and the referentiality of language. Alongside the standard satirical responses to the ancient creed’s rigor and rationalism, seventeenth- and eighteenth-century poetry, drama, and prose developed Stoic formulations that made the most demanding of philosophical ideals tenable within the framework of common experience. Instead of serving as hallmarks for hypocrisy, the literary stoics I investigate uphold a brand of stoicism fit for the post-regicidal, post- Protestant Reformation, post-scientific revolutionary world. My project reveals how writers used Stoicism to determine the viability of philosophical precept and establish ways of compensating for human fallibility. The ambivalent status of the Stoic sage, staged and restaged in countless texts, exemplified the period’s anxiety about measuring up to its ideals, its efforts to discover the plenitude of ii natural laws and to live by them.
    [Show full text]
  • Stoicism a School of Thought That Flourished in Greek and Roman
    Stoicism A school of thought that flourished in Greek and Roman antiquity. It was one of the loftiest and most sublime philosophies in the record of Western civilization. In urging participation in the affairs of man, Stoics have always believed that the goal of all inquiry is to provide man with a mode of conduct characterized by tranquillity of mind and certainty of moral worth. Nature and scope of Stoicism For the early Stoic philosopher, as for all the post-Aristotelian schools, knowledge and its pursuit are no longer held to be ends in themselves. The Hellenistic Age was a time of transition, and the Stoic philosopher was perhaps its most influential spokesman. A new culture was in the making. The heritage of an earlier period, with Athens as its intellectual leader, was to continue, but to undergo many changes. If, as with Socrates, to know is to know oneself, rationality as the sole means by which something outside of the self might be achieved may be said to be the hallmark of Stoic belief. As a Hellenistic philosophy, Stoicism presented an ars vitae, a way of accommodation for people to whom the human condition no longer appeared as the mirror of a universal, calm, and ordered existence. Reason alone could reveal the constancy of cosmic order and the originative source of unyielding value; thus, reason became the true model for human existence. To the Stoic, virtue is an inherent feature of the world, no less inexorable in relation to man than are the laws of nature. The Stoics believed that perception is the basis of true knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Pyrrhonism As a Sect of Buddhism? a Case Study in the Methodology of Comparative Philosophy
    Comparative Philosophy Volume 9, No. 2 (2018): 1-40 Open Access / ISSN 2151-6014 / www.comparativephilosophy.org https://doi.org/10.31979/2151-6014(2018).090204 EARLY PYRRHONISM AS A SECT OF BUDDHISM? A CASE STUDY IN THE METHODOLOGY OF COMPARATIVE PHILOSOPHY MONTE RANSOME JOHNSON & BRETT SHULTS ABSTRACT: We offer a sceptical examination of a thesis recently advanced in a monograph published by Princeton University Press entitled Greek Buddha: Pyrrho’s Encounter with Early Buddhism in Central Asia. In this dense and probing work, Christopher I. Beckwith, a professor of Central Eurasian studies at Indiana University, Bloomington, argues that Pyrrho of Elis adopted a form of early Buddhism during his years in Bactria and Gandhāra, and that early Pyrrhonism must be understood as a sect of early Buddhism. In making his case Beckwith claims that virtually all scholars of Greek, Indian, and Chinese philosophy have been operating under flawed assumptions and with flawed methodologies, and so have failed to notice obvious and undeniable correspondences between the philosophical views of the Buddha and of Pyrrho. In this study we take Beckwith’s proposal and challenge seriously, and we examine his textual basis and techniques of translation, his methods of examining passages, his construal of problems and his reconstruction of arguments. We find that his presuppositions are contentious and doubtful, his own methods are extremely flawed, and that he draws unreasonable conclusions. Although the result of our study is almost entirely negative, we think it illustrates some important general points about the methodology of comparative philosophy. Keywords: adiaphora, anātman, anattā, ataraxia, Buddha, Buddhism, Democritus, Pāli, Pyrrho, Pyrrhonism, Scepticism, trilakṣaṇa 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Platonic and Stoic Passions in Philo of Alexandria Loren Kerns George Fox University, [email protected]
    Digital Commons @ George Fox University George Fox Evangelical Seminary 2013 Platonic and Stoic Passions in Philo of Alexandria Loren Kerns George Fox University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/gfes Part of the Christianity Commons, and the Church History Commons Recommended Citation Kerns, Loren, "Platonic and Stoic Passions in Philo of Alexandria" (2013). George Fox Evangelical Seminary. Paper 6. http://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/gfes/6 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in George Fox Evangelical Seminary by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. Kings College London Platonic and Stoic Passions in Philo of Alexandria A Dissertation submitted to The School of Arts and Humanities In Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Theology and Religious Studies By Loren Kerns London, United Kingdom July 2013 Copyright by Loren Kerns, 2013 All rights reserved. Abstract Philo of Alexandria forged his theory of the soul and its passions while expositing the meaning of Torah. Though writing as a Jewish teacher and disciple of Moses, his biblical reflections display a strong orientation toward Middle-Platonic philosophy. On the topic of the soul and its passions, however, Philo also exhibits significant Stoic influence. The introduction notes Philo’s apparent incompatible use of both the complex Platonic and the monistic Stoic psychological models. After assessing the degree to which Philo understood 'passion' to be a type of Stoic impulse or opinion (chapter one), chapter two demonstrates that Philo consistently drew upon the Stoics’ depiction of all passions as irrational, excessive, and unnatural.
    [Show full text]
  • Moore, K. 2009 'Persaeus of Citium: a Lapsed Stoic?' Rosetta 7: 1-21. Http
    Moore, K. 2009 ‘Persaeus of Citium: A Lapsed Stoic?’ Rosetta 7: 1-21. http://rosetta.bham.ac.uk/issue7/persaeus-citium/ http://rosetta.bham.ac.uk/issue7/persaeus-citium/ Persaeus of Citium: A Lapsed Stoic? Kenneth Moore Abstract: This article examines the historical evidence on the life of Persaeus of Citium, a Stoic philosopher and immediate student of Zeno, the founder of Stoicism. It also considers the anecdotal accounts of Persaeus’ actions with regard to Stoic philosophy as it was understood to apply during his lifetime. Persaeus was one of an elite group of scholars present at the court of Antigonus II Gonatus, King of Macedon and appears to have had a direct involvement in the political affairs of Macedonia. His activities, as recounted in the surviving sources, seem to run contrary to established Stoic customs, in particular the preference for praxis over theoria.1 However, there is also some indication that he may have been vilified by his scholarly and political enemies. This article provides a brief glimpse into the life and times of Persaeus as well as the turbulent fourth/third centuries in Greece. Introduction: Persaeus (ca. 306-243 BCE), of Citium, son of Demetrius, was a Stoic philosopher. He was also a student and close acquaintance of Zeno of Citium (ca. 334-262 BCE), the founder of Stoicism. It is difficult to obtain a clear picture of his life and philosophy since none of his own works survive and most of the sources that deal with him come from late antiquity and provide relatively little, albeit potentially quite significant, information.
    [Show full text]
  • Targeting Emotion in Early Stoicism
    Binghamton University The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB) The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter 12-28-2002 Targeting Emotion in Early Stoicism Scott M. Rubarth Rollins College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://orb.binghamton.edu/sagp Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, Ancient Philosophy Commons, and the History of Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Rubarth, Scott M., "Targeting Emotion in Early Stoicism" (2002). The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter. 353. https://orb.binghamton.edu/sagp/353 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). It has been accepted for inclusion in The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter by an authorized administrator of The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). For more information, please contact [email protected]. Targeting Emotion in Early Stoicism Scott M. Rubarth, Rollins College Presented to the Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy at the 2002 meeting with the Eastern Division of the American Philosophical Association, in Philadelphia The Stoic sage is a cold, heartless being who would not grieve over the loss of a beloved companion or child. Unmoved, unemotional, uncaring, the sage is an ethical and emotional monstrosity hiding behind the pretension of the so-called virtues of detachment and austerity. That, at least, is how many who study Stoic ethics perceive the sage in regard to his/her emotional life. 1 In this paper I will argue that this conception of the Stoic theory of emotion and passion is misleading; emotions, in fact, are central to Stoic ethics and apatheia should not be confused with the contemporary idea of apathy or emotional flatness.
    [Show full text]
  • 2280-2; Most Can Also Be Found Grouped by Topic in Motto (1970)
    1 Not as a Deserter, But as a Spy: Seneca’s Reception of Epicureanism Within the history of Epicurus’ reception at Rome the figure of Seneca the Younger occupies a position of particular interest. Though not himself an Epicurean, Seneca is deeply engaged with Epicurean thought and Epicurean texts; in fact, he refers to Epicurus or to his doctrines and members of his community more than eighty times, in eight of his works, including over forty direct quotations from Epicurean writings.1 Yet his reactions are initially hard to fathom. At times painstakingly accurate, he is also capable of what seems like willful misrepresentation of Epicurus’ views; often antagonistic, he is also on occasion strikingly appreciative of what Epicurus has to offer. On some points he does not hesitate to express as his own view ideas which he knows to be Epicurean in origin. More than that, he will sometimes modify and develop those ideas in ways that make him a fascinating and yet puzzling case of Epicurean influence outside the Garden. The complexity of Seneca’s response at one time made him the case in point for that older view of Roman philosophy that spoke of “eclecticism.” Indeed the very notion of eclecticism as formulated by Eduard Zeller and Karl Praechter was devised in part as a way of accounting for Seneca’s extraordinary attitude toward the rival school.2 Even Pierluigi Donini, who in 1988 effectively demolished the wider picture of philosophy under the Roman empire as predominantly eclectic, finds Seneca to be “a completely isolated and peculiar instance.”3 More recently, numerous careful studies of the particulars of Seneca’s thought have established across the board that Seneca is indeed what he claims to be, a committed though not subservient adherent of Stoicism in all its essentials.4 For that reason it is all the 1 A full list of references is provided in Ferguson (1990), 2280-2; most can also be found grouped by topic in Motto (1970) .
    [Show full text]
  • Seneca-Letters.Pdf
    CLARENDON LATER ANCIENT PHILOSOPHERS Series editors: Jonathan Barnes, Universite´ de Paris IV—Sorbonne and A. A. Long, University of California, Berkeley SENECA SELECTED PHILOSOPHICAL LETTERS Seneca’s Letters to Lucilius are a rich source of information about ancient Stoicism, an influential work for early modern philosophers, and a fascinating philosophical document in their own right. This selection of the letters aims to include those which are of greatest philosophical interest, especially those which highlight the debates between Stoics and Platonists or Aristotelians in the first century AD, and the issue, still important today, of how technical philosophical enquiry is related to the various purposes for which philosophy is practised. In addition to examining the philosophical content of each letter, Brad Inwood’s commentary discusses the literary and historical background of the letters and to their relationship with other prose works by Seneca. Seneca is the earliest Stoic author for whom we have access to a large number of complete works, and these works were highly influential in later centuries. He was also a politically influential advisor to the Roman emperor Nero and a celebrated author of prose and verse. His philosophical acuity and independence of mind make his works exciting and challenging for the modern reader. Brad Inwood is Professor of Classics and Philosophy at the University of Toronto. PUBLISHEDINTHESERIES Alcinous: The Handbook of Platonism John Dillon Epictetus: Discourses, Book Robert Dobbin Galen: On the Therapeutic Method, Books I and II R. J. Hankinson Porphyry: Introduction Jonathan Barnes Seneca: Selected Philosophical Letters Brad Inwood Sextus Empiricus: Against the Ethicists Richard Bett Sextus Empiricus: Against the Grammarians David Blank SENECA SELECTED PHILOSOPHICAL LETTERS Translated with an Introduction and Commentary by BRAD INWOOD 1 1 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
    [Show full text]
  • Locating Stoic Influence in Jules Barbey D'aurevilly's "Du Dandysme Et De Georges Brummell" and Charles Baudelaire's "Le Peintre De La Vie Moderne"
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 1-10-2014 12:00 AM The Evolution of Indifference: Locating Stoic Influence in Jules Barbey d'Aurevilly's "Du Dandysme et de Georges Brummell" and Charles Baudelaire's "Le Peintre de la vie moderne" Aurie Zeran The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Professor Angela Borchert The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Comparative Literature A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Master of Arts © Aurie Zeran 2014 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Comparative Literature Commons Recommended Citation Zeran, Aurie, "The Evolution of Indifference: Locating Stoic Influence in Jules Barbey d'Aurevilly's "Du Dandysme et de Georges Brummell" and Charles Baudelaire's "Le Peintre de la vie moderne"" (2014). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 1860. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/1860 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Evolution of Indifference: Locating Stoic Influence in Jules Barbey d’Aurevilly’s “Du Dandysme et Georges Brummell” and Charles Baudelaire’s “Le Peintre de la vie moderne” (Thesis format: Monograph) by Aurie Zeran Graduate Program in Comparative Literature A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts The School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada © Aurie Zeran, 2013 i Abstract This thesis surveys the relationship between late Roman Stoicism and nineteenth century dandyism.
    [Show full text]
  • Practicing Philosophy
    Practicing Philosophy Practicing Philosophy Edited by Aleksandar Fatić and Lydia Amir Practicing Philosophy Edited by Aleksandar Fatić and Lydia Amir This book first published 2015 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2015 by Aleksandar Fatić, Lydia Amir and contributors All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-8104-X ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-8104-3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 I .................................................................................................................... 3 Ancient Philosophical Reflections on Two Conceptions of Happiness Dimitrios Dentsoras II ................................................................................................................ 22 The Philosophical Practitioner as a Co-Researcher Finn Thorbjøn Hansen III ............................................................................................................... 42 The Meaningfulness of and Satisfaction from Dialogues in Philosophical Practice: Considerations of Content and Methodology Anders Lindseth IV
    [Show full text]
  • The Enchiridion by Epictetus (Translated by Elizabeth Carter)
    The Enchiridion by Epictetus (Translated by Elizabeth Carter) Please note: this essay is located under Essays: Early Church simply because that section has more room. Introduction This text is not a scholarly presentation but an invitation to read an ancient text in the spirit of lectio divina, the theme of this homepage. That means a slow, meditative focus is the aim with a view toward incorporating what we read into our lives. While lectio divina more com- monly pertains to sacred scripture, there’s no reason to confine it there. It’s general princi- ples certainly can apply to philosophical texts, especially ancient ones as the Enchiridion. Most Introductions to texts with regard to scripture or as the one at hand take pains to point out, information about the author or text itself can be garnered from plenty of reliable sources. Such is not the purpose of this document. Hopefully Epictetus himself would give his approval to this lectio divina approach. It’s interesting to note that he was a Stoic philosopher more or less contemporary with Sts. Peter and Paul, all having lived in Rome under the emperor Nero. It gets even better. Epictetus was born a slave and was crippled either by birth, accident or deliberately. We’re simply not sure, but this adds a certain charm as well as authority to his writings. Furthermore, Admiral James Stockdale, a devotee of Epictetus, found support in his Stoic philosophy while a prisoner of war in North Vietnam for seven years. One such website details this and links a book he had written inspired by Epictetus.
    [Show full text]
  • Henry More As Reader of Marcus Aurelius
    Henry More as Reader of Marcus Aurelius JOHN SELLARS ABSTRACT: I examine Henry More’s engagement with Stoicism in general, and Marcus Aurelius in particular, in his Enchiridion Ethicum. More quotes from Marcus’s Meditations throughout the Enchiridion, leading one commentator to note that More ‘mined the Meditations’ when writing his book. Yet More’s general attitude towards Stoicism is more often than not critical, especially when it comes to the passions. I shall argue that while More was clearly an avid reader of the Meditations he read Marcus not as a Stoic but as a ‘non-denominational’ ancient moralist who confirms a range of doctrines that More finds elsewhere in ancient philosophy. In this sense More continues the Neoplatonic practice of downplaying doctrinal differences between ancient philosophers in order to construct a single ancient philosophical tradition. This is quite different from the approach of his contemporary and fellow Cambridge Platonist, Ralph Cudworth, who was keen to highlight doctrinal differences between ancient philosophers. Henry More’s Enchiridion Ethicum, first published in 1668 and translated into English as An Account of Virtue in 1690,1 is rich in references to ancient philosophical authors. Among these Aristotle is probably the most prominent, but a casual reader of the work cannot help be struck by the frequency with which More quotes from or refers to the Meditations of Marcus Aurelius. Indeed, the frequency led one recent commentator to claim that More ‘mined the Meditations’ when writing the work.2 More was by no means alone in being captivated by the Meditations during this period.
    [Show full text]