DOCSLIB.ORG

Seneca-Letters.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Seneca-Letters.Pdf CLARENDON LATER ANCIENT PHILOSOPHERS Series editors: Jonathan Barnes, Universite´ de Paris IV—Sorbonne and A. A. Long, University of California, Berkeley SENECA SELECTED PHILOSOPHICAL LETTERS Seneca’s Letters to Lucilius are a rich source of information about ancient Stoicism, an influential work for early modern philosophers, and a fascinating philosophical document in their own right. This selection of the letters aims to include those which are of greatest philosophical interest, especially those which highlight the debates between Stoics and Platonists or Aristotelians in the first century AD, and the issue, still important today, of how technical philosophical enquiry is related to the various purposes for which philosophy is practised. In addition to examining the philosophical content of each letter, Brad Inwood’s commentary discusses the literary and historical background of the letters and to their relationship with other prose works by Seneca. Seneca is the earliest Stoic author for whom we have access to a large number of complete works, and these works were highly influential in later centuries. He was also a politically influential advisor to the Roman emperor Nero and a celebrated author of prose and verse. His philosophical acuity and independence of mind make his works exciting and challenging for the modern reader. Brad Inwood is Professor of Classics and Philosophy at the University of Toronto. PUBLISHEDINTHESERIES Alcinous: The Handbook of Platonism John Dillon Epictetus: Discourses, Book Robert Dobbin Galen: On the Therapeutic Method, Books I and II R. J. Hankinson Porphyry: Introduction Jonathan Barnes Seneca: Selected Philosophical Letters Brad Inwood Sextus Empiricus: Against the Ethicists Richard Bett Sextus Empiricus: Against the Grammarians David Blank SENECA SELECTED PHILOSOPHICAL LETTERS Translated with an Introduction and Commentary by BRAD INWOOD 1 1 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York Brad Inwood The moral rights of the author have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published First published in paperback All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover and you must impose the same condition on any acquirer British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Data available Typeset by Laserwords Private Limited, Chennai, India Printed in Great Britain on acid-free paper by CPI Antony Rowe, Chippenham, Wiltshire ISBN –––– (hbk) –––– (pbk) For my parents PREFACE In the course of my work on this book I have incurred more debts than I can fully recall, let alone acknowledge here. It is a genuine pleasure to thank, first and foremost, the Centre for Advanced Study in the Behavioural Sciences for their support during a sabbatical leave in –. Without the respite and stimulus provided by that unique institution this book would never have been completed. I am also very grateful to the Canada Research Chair program of the Canadian government and to my friends and colleagues at the University of Toronto for invaluable and unstinting support. I owe a great deal to the generous and careful work of my research assistants in the Department of Classics, Vicki Ciocani and Emily Fletcher. My initial work on Seneca’s letters was encouraged by an invitation from the ancient philosophy group at Cambridge University to a workshop on Seneca’s letters in May . The discussion at that workshop contributed a great deal to several of the commentaries in this book. Later, students in two of my graduate seminars (in and ) at the University of Toronto served as willing guinea pigs and ingenious collaborators. A keen group of graduate students at New York University provided helpful feedback on several letters during a series of visits in ; I am grateful to Phillip Mitsis for the invitation to NYU and for his encouragement and advice on Seneca over many years. Tony Long has been both supportive of and patient about this project for a very long time. His acute comments and those of his fellow series editor Jonathan Barnes have improved the commentary and translation at many points; no doubt I should have taken their advice more consistently. David Sedley’s work on the relationship between Stoic physics and ethics in Seneca’s work (especially in his article ‘Stoic Metaphysics at Rome’, Sedley ) has been a valuable source of stimulus. The need to respond to John Cooper’s challenging discussion ‘Moral Theory and Moral Improvement: Seneca’ (Cooper ) provoked many fruitful lines of enquiry. The ancient philosophy group at the University of Chicago has done a great deal for the study of Seneca during the time when this book was under construction (not least by organizing a key conference in April ) and their confidence in the value of Senecan studies in a contemporary philosophical setting has fostered a great deal of work by many people from which I have been able to benefit. viii Some commentaries have benefitted from work on papers originally written for oral presentation and since published separately. The com- mentary on Letter is intimately connected to a paper given at the Universities of Buffalo, British Columbia, and Alberta, ‘Reason, Ration- alization and Happiness’; it now appears as chapter of Reading Seneca (Inwood ). The commentary on Letter began as a sketch for ‘Getting to Goodness’, delivered to the Princeton Ancient Philosophy Colloquium and at the University of Pittsburgh and now published as chapter of Reading Seneca. The commentary on Letter has been enriched by discussion of an unpublished paper presented at Cornell University, the University of Arizona, and UC Santa Barbara. I owe a particularly concrete debt of gratitude to Margaret Graver, who subjected the penultimate draft of my translation to an exacting scrutiny. Her influence has saved me from many errors and infelicities and I have often accepted her suggestions for better wording; the remaining blunders are my own fault. Margaret also read an early version of the commentaries with a critical eye; her comments and suggestions have improved my comment on almost every letter. It is no mere cliche´ to say that without the encouragement, advice, and loving support of my wife, Niko Scharer, I would not have been able to write this book. An even older debt is owed to my parents, Marg and Bill Inwood. For many decades they have provided a wonderful education, both moral and intellectual. My brothers and I had the privilege of growing up in a household where critical enquiry, teaching, intellectual challenge, and a passion for fairness were in the fabric of daily life. It has taken me a long time to see how precious a gift our parents gave us. Humbly, I dedicate this book to them. CONTENTS Introduction xi Abbreviations and Conventions xxv TRANSLATIONS 1 Letter Letter Letter Letter Letter Letter Letter Letter Letter Letter Letter Letter Letter Letter Letter Letter Letter COMMENTARY 105 Group (Letters , , ) Letter Letter Letter x Group (Letters and ) Letter Letter Group (Letters and ) Letter Letter Group (Letters , and ) Letter Letter Letter Group (Letters –) Letter Letter Letter Letter Letter Letter Letter Bibliography Index Locorum General Index INTRODUCTION Seneca’s Life and Works Lucius Annaeus Seneca, better known as Seneca the Younger, was a complex figure. At some point between and at Corduba in Roman Spain, he was born into a prosperous and prominent provin- cial Roman family. His father, Seneca the Elder, was an important literary figure in Rome itself, famous as the author of the Controversi- ae and Suasoriae, compilations of rhetorical declamations by the most famous speakers of the day. Seneca the Younger was the middle of three sons; while his older brother had a successful if convention- al political career leading to a provincial governorship, the youngest son lived a private life and did not achieve senatorial rank. Seneca the Younger took an early interest in philosophy, oratory, and liter- ature and over the course of a long career rose to become a seni- or adviser to the emperor Nero and the most prominent literary figure of his generation, publishing extensively in both prose and verse. Seneca’s early life is difficult to document, although his career becomes easier to track after he was forced into exile in owing to some sort of court intrigue.¹ He was recalled to Rome and political influence in . For readers of this volume, the most important facts are his early interest in philosophy, his lifelong commitment to philosophical study and writing, and his determination to combine those interests with a long and active political career as well as a major role as a prominent literary figure. He was the author of many tragedies (whose relationship to philosophy is a controversial issue) and a famous orator; his satirical work on the emperor Claudius, the Apocolocyntosis, is yet another demonstration of his virtuosity.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Coherence of Stoic Ontology
    The Coherence of Stoic Ontology by Vanessa de Harven A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Prof. Dorothea Frede, Co-chair Prof. Klaus Corcilius, Co-chair Prof. A.A. Long Spring 2012 Abstract The Coherence of Stoic Ontology by Vanessa de Harven Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy University of California, Berkeley Professors Dorothea Frede and Klaus Corcilius, Co-chairs Any thoroughgoing physicalist is challenged to give an account of immaterial entities such as thoughts and mathematical objects. The Stoics, who eagerly affirmed that only bodies exist, crafted an elegant solution to this challenge: not everything that is Something (ti) exists. Rather, some things have a derivative mode of reality they call subsistence: these entities are non-existent in that they are not themselves solid bodies, but they are nonetheless Something physical because they depend on bodies for their subsistence. My dissertation uncovers the unifying principles of Stoic subsistence, and shows how they can account for thoughts and other immaterial entities without running afoul of their physicalist commitments. While all commentators agree that the Stoics posited Something as the highest category of being, they have failed to find a coherent physicalist account of Stoic ontology. For instance, (1) a canonical set of incorporeals (time, place, void, and what is sayable (lekton)) is well attested, but there is little agreement as to what these entities have in common as incorporeals, which makes the category look like an ad hoc collection of left-over entities.
    [Show full text]
  • Commentary on Englert Martha Nussbaum I Admire Englert's
    Commentary on Englert Martha Nussbaum I admire Englert's paper. I find its major conclusions entirely convincing: (1) the analysis of the difference between Epicurean and Stoic attitudes to suicide; (2) the account of the original Stoic position; (3) the argument that Seneca is an orthodox Stoic about suicide; and (4) the very interesting claims about the role of dif- ferent sorts of freedom in Seneca's arguments. Although I am persuaded by his analysis, I am inclined to be somewhat more critical of the Stoic position than he seems inclined to be: for I think that in a crucial way it is internally incoherent. In what follows, therefore, I want to focus on a problem in the Stoic account itself, with respect to the ambivalence the suicide theory reveals toward the importance of externals. I shall do this by focusing on one line of argument leading to suicide, in Seneca's De Ira.l 1. The Stoics famously hold that only virtue is worth choosing for its own sake. And virtue all by itself suffices for a complete- ly fulfilled and fulfilling human life, that is, for eudaimonia. Virtue is something unaffected by external contingency—both, apparently, as to its acquisition and as to its maintenance once acquired? Items that are not fully under the control of the 1. My interpretation of this work is developed at greater length in Nussbaum 1994. My general account of Stoic virtue theory and its relationship to the call for the extirpation of passion is in chapter 10, my detailed analysis of the argu- ments about anger in the De Ira in chapter 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Platons Raumbegriff Verständlich, Desgleichen Der Umstand, Daß Timaios Grenzen Einer Erklärung Der Welt Und Schwierigkeiten Einer Konsistenten Darstellung Hervorhebt
    Der Begriff des Raumes im „Timaios“ im Zusammenhang mit der Naturphilosophie und der Metaphysik Platons Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Philosophie der Philosophischen Fakultät der Universität Konstanz vorgelegt von Kyung Jik Lee aus Seoul Referent: Prof. Dr. Jürgen Mittelstraß Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Gereon Wolters Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 19. Juli 1999 Diese Arbeit erscheint im Mai 2000 auch als Buchhandelsausgabe im Verlag Königshausen & Neumann, Würzburg Meinen Eltern gewidmet Inhaltsverzeichnis Vorwort 9 I Die Erklärung der Welt als wahrscheinliche Erklärung (eikôs logos) 11 1 Einleitung 2 Die Synonymität von eikôs mythos und eikôs logos 3 Der eikôs logos als nicht-philosophische Erklärung 4 Der eikôs logos 4.1 Akribês logos? 4.2 Das Wahrscheinliche und das Historische 4.3 Das Wahrscheinliche und das Notwendige 4.4 Die wahrscheinliche Rede als inkonsistente Rede 4.5 Die wahrscheinliche Rede als hypothetische Anwendung einer exakten Erklärung auf sinnliche Gegenstände 4.6 Die wahrscheinliche Rede als Begrenzung der Anwendung einer exakten Erklärung auf sinnliche Gegenstände II Der Demiurg und der Logos der Welt 38 1 Einleitung 2 Wer ist der Demiurg im „Timaios“? 3 Demiurg und Gott 4 Demiurg und Weltseele 5 Demiurg und Idee des Guten 6 Demiurg und transzendente Vernunft 7 Schwierigkeiten der Rede vom Demiurgen 7.1 Zur Suche nach dem Demiurgen 7.2 Logos und Ergon 7.3 Demiurg und Timaios 7.3.1 Einleitung 7.3.2 Poiêtês 7.3.3 Weitere Parallelen zwischen Demiurg und Timaios 7.3.4 Gott und Götter 7.4 Der Demiurg
    [Show full text]
  • The Hymn of Cleanthes Greek Text Translated Into English
    UC-NRLF 557 C29 ^ 033 TDt. 3 + 1921 3• MAIN ^ ft (9 -- " EXTS FOR STUDENTS, No. 26 THE YMN OF CLEANTHES GREEK TEXT TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH WITH BRIEF INTRODUCTION AND NOTES BY E. H. BLAKENEY, M.A. ce 6d. net. HELPS FOR STUDENTS OF HISTORY. 1. EPISCOPAL REGISTERS OF ENGLAND AND WALES. By R. C. Fowler, B.A., F.S.A. 6d. net. 2. MUNICIPAL RECORDS. By F. J. C. Hearnsuaw, M.A. Gd. net. 3. MEDIEVAL RECKONINGS OF TIME. ' By Reginald L. Poole, LL.D., Litt.D. 6d. net. % 4. THE PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE. By Charles Johnson. 6d. net. 5. THE CARE OF DOCUMENTS. By Charles Johnson. 6d.net. 6. THE LOGIC OF HISTORY. By C. G. Cramp. 8d.net. 7. DOCUMENTS IN THE PUBUC RECORD OFFICE, DUBLIN. By B. H. Murray, Litt.D. 8d. net. 8. THE FRENCH WARS OF RELIGION. By Arthur A. TiUey» M.A. 6d. net. By Sir A. W. WARD, Litt.D., F.B.A. 9. THE PERIOD OF CONGRESSES, I. Introductory. 8d.net. 10. THE PERIOD OF CONGRESSES, II. Vienna and the Second Peace of Paris. Is. net. 11. THE PERIOD OF CONGRESSES, IH. Aix-la-ChapeUe to Verona. Is. net. (Nos. 9, 10, and 11 in one volume, cloth, 3s. Gd. net.) 12. SECURITIES OF PEACE. A Retrospect (1848-1914). Paper, 2s. ; cloth, 3s. net. 13. THE FRENCH RENAISSANCE. By Arthur A. TiUey, M.A* 8d. net. 14. HINTS ON THE STUDY OF ENGUSH ECONOMIC HISTORY. By W. Cunningham, D.D., F.B.A., F.S.A. 8d. net. 1 5. PARISH HISTORY AND RECORDS.
    [Show full text]
  • The Consolation of Philosophy
    Anthós (1990-1996) Volume 1 Number 5 Article 9 1996 The Consolation of Philosophy Shawna Purcell Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anthos_archives Part of the Philosophy Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Purcell, Shawna (1996) "The Consolation of Philosophy," Anthós (1990-1996): Vol. 1 : No. 5 , Article 9. Available at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anthos_archives/vol1/iss5/9 This open access Article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). All documents in PDXScholar should meet accessibility standards. If we can make this document more accessible to you, contact our team. The Consolation ofPhilosophy Shawna Purcell Every generation leaves its imprint of culture on the next generation. Just as the Western civilization inherited the European culture, the Romans inherited the Greek culture. These imprints over time, are refined and built upon to create a "new" culture. As Seneca put it, "A cultivates B and B cultivp.tes C; no one is his own master" (Seneca, 292). Focusing upon lit­ erature, we can observe the transition of the memorized and spo­ ken epics of the Greek culture to the written works of the Romans that are intertexted with ~lusions to particular epics. As twentieth century readers we can understand earlier works such as the Consolation ofPhilosophy by reading it against a tradition­ al background and applying the four fold scheme of interpreta­ tion. The following discussion will show how Boethius has deeply woven into his poems the philosophies and writing styles of his predecessors Homer, Seneca, Ovid and Plato, including the Stoics.
    [Show full text]
  • Pt: Must Translate By: 2
    Solution to Challenge 3 Start by using the description of the MPSC cipher and Hint 1. We have: pt: m u s t Translate by: 2 3 4 5 CT: P Y X Z What this tells you: 1. If “m” was shifted two to the right to arrive at “p”, the “n” or “o” must be missing in between them. That means that “n” or “o” (but not both) appear in the keyword. This assumes that “m” isn’t in the keyword, but since it lies two letters from “p” it looks like it is in the normal alphabetical sequence. 2. One of “v”, “w”, or “x” must also be in the keyword. (The keyword is not “kryptos” !). Again, this assumes that “u” is not in the keyword. 3. Once again, since “s” is about 4 letters from “x” in the normal alphabet, we assume that “s” and “x” are not in the keyword but appearing in alphabetical order. This agrees nicely with #2: “v” or “w” is in the keyword AND “t” and “u” are NOT in the keyword (since we need these letters to keep “s” and “x” 4 letters apart. 4. If “v” or “w” is in the keyword, this makes “t” 5 letters from “z” if “y” and “z” are not in the keyword. Then end of the alphabet line looks like: … m (n o ) p… s t u (v w) x y z where parentheses were used to indicate groupings where one letter is missing (and appears earlier in the keyword). In order to make further progress, one might start guessing at possible two letter words that could reasonably precede “must”: “we” and “it” come to mind.
    [Show full text]
  • Therapeutic Arguments, Spiritual Exercises, Or the Care of the Self: Martha Nussbaum, Pierre Hadot and Michel Foucault on Ancient Philosophy
    Therapeutic Arguments, Spiritual Exercises, or the Care of the Self: Martha Nussbaum, Pierre Hadot and Michel Foucault on Ancient Philosophy Konrad Banicki Jagiellonian University, Poland ABSTRACT. The practical aspect of ancient philosophy has been recently made a focus of renewed metaphilosophical investigation. After a brief presentation of three accounts of this kind developed by Martha Nussbaum, Pierre Hadot, and Michel Foucault, the model of the therapeutic argument developed by Nussbaum is called into question from the perspectives offered by her French colleagues, who emphasize spiritual exercise (Hadot) or the care of the self (Foucault). The ways in which the account of Nussbaum can be defended are then discussed, including both a ‘negative’ defense, i.e. the indication of the weaknesses of Hadot and Foucault’s proposals, and a ‘positive’ one focused on the points in which Nussbaum can convincingly address doubts about her metaphilosophical account. In response to these analyses, some further remarks made by Hadot and Foucault are discussed in order to demonstrate that their accounts are not as distant from Nussbaum after all. Finally, a recent metaphilosophical study by John Sellars together with a therapeutic (medical) model developed by the author of the present article are suggested as providing a framework for potential reconciliation between all three accounts discussed and a resource for further metaphilosophical studies. KEYWORDS. Nussbaum, Hadot, Foucault, philosophy as therapy, spiritual exercises, care of the self I. INTRODUCTION ecently renewed interest in ancient philosophy has certainly offered R a unique opportunity for contemporary philosophical studies. It has contributed to current debates not only with new, or at least long forgotten theses, but also with substantially different theoretical perspectives and conceptual frameworks.
    [Show full text]
  • Stoic Enlightenments
    Copyright © 2011 Margaret Felice Wald All rights reserved STOIC ENLIGHTENMENTS By MARGARET FELICE WALD A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in English written under the direction of Michael McKeon and approved by ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey October 2011 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Stoic Enlightenments By MARGARET FELICE WALD Dissertation Director: Michael McKeon Stoic ideals infused seventeenth- and eighteenth-century thought, not only in the figure of the ascetic sage who grins and bears all, but also in a myriad of other constructions, shaping the way the period imagined ethical, political, linguistic, epistemological, and social reform. My dissertation examines the literary manifestation of Stoicism’s legacy, in particular regarding the institution and danger of autonomy, the foundation and limitation of virtue, the nature of the passions, the difference between good and evil, and the referentiality of language. Alongside the standard satirical responses to the ancient creed’s rigor and rationalism, seventeenth- and eighteenth-century poetry, drama, and prose developed Stoic formulations that made the most demanding of philosophical ideals tenable within the framework of common experience. Instead of serving as hallmarks for hypocrisy, the literary stoics I investigate uphold a brand of stoicism fit for the post-regicidal, post- Protestant Reformation, post-scientific revolutionary world. My project reveals how writers used Stoicism to determine the viability of philosophical precept and establish ways of compensating for human fallibility. The ambivalent status of the Stoic sage, staged and restaged in countless texts, exemplified the period’s anxiety about measuring up to its ideals, its efforts to discover the plenitude of ii natural laws and to live by them.
    [Show full text]
  • Stony Brook University
    SSStttooonnnyyy BBBrrrooooookkk UUUnnniiivvveeerrrsssiiitttyyy The official electronic file of this thesis or dissertation is maintained by the University Libraries on behalf of The Graduate School at Stony Brook University. ©©© AAAllllll RRRiiiggghhhtttsss RRReeessseeerrrvvveeeddd bbbyyy AAAuuuttthhhooorrr... Heraclitus and the Work of Awakening A Dissertation Presented by Nicolas Elias Leon Ruiz to The Graduate School in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy Stony Brook University August 2007 Copyright by Nicolas Elias Leon Ruiz August 2007 Stony Brook University The Graduate School Nicolas Elias Leon Ruiz We, the dissertation committee for the above candidate for the Doctor of Philosophy degree, hereby recommend acceptance of this dissertation. Dr. Peter Manchester – Dissertation Advisor Associate Professor of Philosophy Dr. David Allison – Chairperson of Defense Professor of Philosophy Dr. Eduardo Mendieta Associate Professor of Philosophy Dr. Gregory Shaw Professor of Religious Studies Stonehill College This dissertation is accepted by the Graduate School Lawrence Martin Dean of the Graduate School ii Abstract of the Dissertation Heraclitus and the Work of Awakening by Nicolas Elias Leon Ruiz Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy Stony Brook University 2007 Heraclitus is regarded as one of the foundational figures of western philosophy. As such, he is typically read as some species of rational thinker: empiricist, materialist, metaphysician, dialectician, phenomenologist, etc. This dissertation argues that all of these views of Heraclitus and his work are based upon profoundly mistaken assumptions. Instead, Heraclitus is shown to be a thoroughly and consistently mystical writer whose work is organized around the recurring theme of awakening. He is thus much more akin to figures such as Buddha, Lao Tzu, and Empedocles than to Aristotle or Hegel.
    [Show full text]
  • Euripides” Johanna Hanink
    The Life of the Author in the Letters of “Euripides” Johanna Hanink N 1694, Joshua Barnes, the eccentric British scholar (and poet) of Greek who the next year would become Regius Professor at the University of Cambridge, published his I 1 long-awaited Euripidis quae extant omnia. This was an enormous edition of Euripides’ works which contained every scrap of Euripidean material—dramatic, fragmentary, and biographical —that Barnes had managed to unearth.2 In the course of pre- paring the volume, Barnes had got wind that Richard Bentley believed that the epistles attributed by many ancient manu- scripts to Euripides were spurious; he therefore wrote to Bentley asking him to elucidate the grounds of his doubt. On 22 February 1693, Bentley returned a letter to Barnes in which he firmly declared that, with regard to the ancient epistles, “tis not Euripides himself that here discourseth, but a puny sophist that acts him.” Bentley did, however, recognize that convincing others of this would be a difficult task: “as for arguments to prove [the letters] spurious, perhaps there are none that will convince any person that doth not discover it by himself.”3 1 On the printing of the book and its early distribution see D. McKitterick, A History of Cambridge University Press I Printing and the Book Trade in Cambridge, 1534–1698 (Cambridge 1992) 380–392; on Joshua Barnes see K. L. Haugen, ODNB 3 (2004) 998–1001. 2 C. Collard, Tragedy, Euripides and Euripideans (Bristol 2007) 199–204, re- hearses a number of criticisms of Barnes’ methods, especially concerning his presentation of Euripidean fragments (for which he often gave no source, and which occasionally consisted of lines from the extant plays).
    [Show full text]
  • BOETHIUS and HOMER by BOETHIUS Wrote His Consolation Of
    BOETHIUS AND HOMER by MICHAEL FOURNIER OETHIUS wrote his Consolation of Philosophy while in prison Bawaiting execution.1 Although it has a place in numerous traditions and genres (e.g., philosophical dialogue, protreptic, Menippean satire, theodicy, epiphany literature, contemptus mundi) it is prima facie a consolatio.2 Yet in the studies of ancient consolations by Constant Martha, Karl Buresch, Rudolf Kassel, and Horst-Theodor Johann3 there are no more than a few brief references to Boethius, and virtually none in the more recent surveys of the tradition by Robert Gregg and Paul Holloway.4 However, as not only the title (which he gave to the work himself) and the frequent use of consolatory topoi, but also the parallels with the dramatic setting of the Phaedo5 make clear, Boethius understood his work to belong to this tradition. In addition to consolations for the bereaved, Cicero asserts that there are a host of consola- tions for other afflictions, referring to ‘definite words of comfort’ for dealing with poverty (de paupertate,…et ingloria), a life without office and fame (vita inhonorata) as well as ‘definite forms of discourse dealing with exile, ruin of country, slavery, infirmity, blindness, every accident upon which the term disaster can be fixed’ (Tusc. 3,81). While Boethius deals with a number of these topics, including poverty (2,5; 3,3), the loss of office (2,6; 3,4) and fame (2,7; 3,6), exile (1,5,2-5), ruin of country (1,4,20-27), and even figurative and metaphorical slavery (1m2,25), infirmity (1m1,10-11) and blindness (1m3,1-2), the ultimate cause of the grief for which he seeks consolation is not one of these traditional problems.6 Boethius’ work is, like Cicero’s Consolatio, an example of self- consolation.7 Like Cicero, Boethius was not content simply to read and reflect upon other consolatory writings.
    [Show full text]
  • Civilization and Its Fate
    STUDIA PHILOSOPHICA WRATISLAVIENSIA Supplementary Volume, English Edition 2013 Edited by Adam Chmielewski, Roman Konik Damian Leszczyński, Artur Pacewicz WROCŁAW 2013 Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia Supplementary Volume, English Edition 2013 Edited by Adam Chmielewski, Roman Konik, Damian Leszczynski,´ Artur Pacewicz Publishers Instytut Filozofii Uniwersytetu Wroc lawskiego Polskie Forum Filozoficzne ⃝c Copyright by Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia 2013 The Editor-in-chief Adam Chmielewski Editorial Team Roman Konik Damian Leszczynski´ Artur Pacewicz Secretary Urszula Lisowska Niniejsza praca naukowa zosta la sfinansowana w ramach programu Ministra Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyzszego_ pod nazwa¸,,Narodowy Program Rozwoju Humanistyki" za po´srednictwem grantu nr 31H 11 0059 80 w latach 2012{2013. The present issue of the quarterly journal Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia has been financed from the grant no 31H 11 0059 80 of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Poland, within the framework of the National Pro- gramme of the Development of Humanities in the years 2012{2013. Editorial Office Instytut Filozofii Uniwersytetu Wroc lawskiego ul. Koszarowa 3 51{149 Wroc law e-mail: [email protected] www.studiaphilosophica.pl ISSN 1895{8001 ISBN 978{83{933495{04{1 (e-book) ISBN 978{83{933495{05{8 Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia Supplementary Volume, English Edition 2013 Contents Adam Chmielewski, Editor's Foreword .................................... 7 History of Philosophy Artur Pacewicz, Wisdom { Knowledge
    [Show full text]