DOCSLIB.ORG

The Evolution of Fed Independence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Evolution of Fed Independence FEDERALRESERVE The Evolution of Fed Independence BY STEPHEN SLIVINSKI oday there is a consensus Wars, Depression, and How monetary policy that a central bank can best Dependence T contribute to good economic When the United States entered and central bank performance by pursuing price stabil- World War I in April 1917, the Federal ity — and that it should remain inde- Reserve almost instantly became the autonomy came pendent from political forces. In the primary vehicle for financing the war case of price stability, this understand- effort. The main function of the Fed of age ing evolved over decades of experi- during those war years was to lend ence. The notion of independence of money to banks to purchase “Liberty the central bank was more difficult to Loans” bonds from the U.S. Treasury. fulfill. They loaned the money at a discount- The original conception of the ed rate — not coincidentally lower Federal Reserve System when it was than the interest rate on the war bonds created in 1913 was meant to continue — to entice bond purchasers. After the spirit of the “independent treasury the war, the Federal Reserve Bank of system” that existed in the pre-Fed New York remained the official era. That system assumed that the U.S. fiscal agent of the U.S. Treasury Treasury would store its gold and Department. assets in its own vaults lest it unduly In the post-war years, the Fed influence the markets for credit and busied itself with maintaining the money. Ideally, Treasury meddling in newly reconstructed gold standard. what passed for monetary policy at the Its missteps in the wake of the stock time was to be avoided. market of October 1929 contributed Yet for most of the first four to the impression that the Fed was decades of its existence, a lack of powerless. independence was characteristic of Political forces retained the upper the Federal Reserve. The hand of the hand in the economic upheaval of the executive branch of the U.S. govern- Great Depression. As economist Allan ment was ever-present when the Fed Meltzer points out in his began operations in November 1914. history of the Fed, monetary The 1913 act that created the Fed policy would basically be made the Secretary of the Treasury dictated by Congress and and the Comptroller of the Currency the White House between ex officio members of the Board. 1933 and 1951. For instance, In fact, the Treasury secretary after Franklin Roosevelt presided over all meetings in those became president in 1933 he early days. The Board did not have assumed emergency powers its own building — they held their that explicitly took the meetings in the Treasury building United States off the gold instead. standard. Congress would Thus, the evolution of monetary later that year mandate that policy cannot be understood without the Fed issue “reserve notes” an understanding of the changes not backed by gold. The Fed Although the Fed Board of Governors and personalities involved in the was forced to freeze its asset portfolio VERNORS moved into their own building in 1937, evolution of the Fed as an institution. and the monetary base was effectively their independence in monetary policy ARD OF GO Throughout much of its history, the determined by the Treasury. wasn’t established until 1951. The struggle for independence has often Additionally, the Federal Reserve headquarters was named the Eccles occurred in conjunction with changes structure as we know it today is a by- Building — after the former Fed : FEDERAL RESERVE BO : FEDERAL RESERVE chairman influential in achieving in policy — and these changes have product of the policy actions taken Fed independence — in 1982. OGRAPHY T tended to reinforce each other. during the Great Depression. Many of PHO Fall 2009 • Region Focus 5 them were motivated by a desire of policymakers to further afoot to persuade Snyder to accept a small increase in short- centralize control over monetary policy. When Roosevelt term interest rates. At that meeting, Sproul raised a went looking for a new head of the Federal Reserve Board, challenge: The FOMC “should not seek instructions” from he settled on Marriner Eccles, an assistant to his Treasury the U.S. Treasury. Eccles agreed and said that if the Fed is secretary. Yet Eccles told the president he wouldn’t take the “expected to survive as an agency with any independence job unless the Fed was reformed to give the Board more whatsoever [it] should exercise some independence.” power over the regional Fed banks. The 1935 amendment to President Truman was also willing to try to influence Fed the Federal Reserve Act modified the FOMC and Eccles policy. In early December 1950, he phoned McCabe at his became its chief. He would serve as chairman until 1948. home and urged him to “stick rigidly” to the pegged bond While the 1935 act took the Secretary of the Treasury and rates. “I hope the Board will not allow the bottom to drop the Comptroller of the Currency off the Fed Board, it didn’t from under our securities. If that happens that is exactly translate into a softer hand by the executive branch in mon- what Mr. Stalin wants.” etary policymaking. When the United States entered World To help smooth relations and try to persuade the admin- War II, the Fed became again a mechanism by which the istration to change their stance on the bond peg, McCabe government could more cheaply finance the war effort. In met with Truman and Snyder at the White House on Jan. 17, April 1942, the Fed announced a policy of cooperating with 1951. The chairman stated the concerns of the Fed and the the Treasury to keep interest rates low. By 1947, the Fed was meeting ended without a specific resolution. McCabe summarizing its “primary duty” as “the financing of military seemed convinced that their conversation would continue requirements and of production for war purposes.” In his behind the scenes at a later date. memoirs, Eccles even described his work during this period But the next day Snyder delivered a speech to the New as “a routine administrative job” as the Fed “merely execut- York Board of Trade in which he announced that McCabe ed Treasury decisions.” Alan Sproul, the president of the had agreed with the Treasury’s peg policy. This infuriated the New York Fed, lamented, “We are not the masters in our members of the FOMC. The minutes of the Fed meeting own house.” record that McCabe reported to his colleagues that he had made no such commitment. The Accord The Fed decided to fight back. At their January 29 meet- After the war, Eccles — worried about inflation — began to ing, in a challenge to the Treasury, the Fed allowed the price make strong statements behind the scenes to the effect that of the pegged government bond to drop. The action the Fed should no longer support the prices of Treasury prompted Truman to call the entire FOMC to the White bonds. The “peg,” as it was called, was the rule by which the House to apply some pressure the next day. It was the first Fed would buy up those Treasury securities if prices fell as a time a U.S. president had done such a thing. result of a sell-off. President Truman didn’t take kindly to the As Meltzer describes it, “The meeting with the president Fed’s new stirrings of independence and told Eccles that he smothered the conflict in ambiguity. Everyone seemed to would not be reappointed when his term as chairman was agree, but no one changed position.” Yet the FOMC mem- over in 1948. He was replaced by Thomas McCabe but bers also were confident that nothing said at the meeting stayed on the Board as vice chairman. could have been construed as an endorsement of the Yet many within the Fed, particularly New York’s Sproul, Treasury’s policy position. were worried about the loss of Fed independence. For the At noon on February 1, the White House released a press next two years, the Fed and the Treasury would cooperate statement that took the Fed policymakers by surprise: The but in a rather tense and uneasy way. While the Treasury Truman administration announced that the Federal Reserve bond peg remained mostly intact, the stage was slowly being Board had agreed to the peg policy. In his memoirs, Eccles set for a showdown. noted that if swift action was not taken , the Federal Reserve The spark that ignited the next consequential chain of would lose the independent status Congress meant it to have events was the Korean War which began on June 26, 1950. and “would be reduced to the level of a Treasury bureau.” Although the first year of that war was financed mainly by The fight for Fed independence also began to hone the tax increases, the Treasury Secretary John Snyder made no thinking of Fed policymakers about the nature of inflation secret of his department’s commitment to keeping the Fed and the consequences of pegging the interest rate of in the business of maintaining the bond price peg. Treasury bonds. By committing to a policy of buying those The FOMC had other ideas in mind. Still wary of infla- bonds when the price fell below an arbitrary level, the tion, Fed policymakers were eager to raise the short-term FOMC members began to understand that they were interest rate to reduce the money supply and stave off price expanding the money supply. Richmond Fed economist increases. That would also have an effect on government Robert Hetzel and former Board of Governors economist financing of debt — it would drive down the price of bonds, Ralph Leach suggests this marked an “intellectual water- which is always inversely correlated with the interest rate, shed.” “Gone,” they write, “was the self-image of a central and also increase the government’s cost of borrowing.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Federal Reserve Act of 1913
    THE FEDERAL RESERVE ACT OF 1913 HISTORY AND DIGEST by V. GILMORE IDEN PUBLISHED BY THE NATIONAL BANK NEWS PHILADELPHIA Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Copyright, 1914 by Ccrtttiois Bator Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis History of Federal Reserve Act History N MONDAY, October 21, 1907, the Na­ O tional Bank of Commerce of New York City announced its refusal to clear for the Knickerbocker Trust Company of the same city. The trust company had deposits amounting to $62,000,000. The next day, following a run of three hours, the Knickerbocker Trust Company paid out $8,000,000 and then suspended. One immediate result was that banks, acting independently, held on tight to the cash they had in their vaults, and money went to a premium. Ac­ cording to the experts who investigated the situation, this panic was purely a bankers’ panic and due entirely to our system of banking, which bases the protection of the financial solidity of the country upon the individual reserves of banks. In the case of a stress, such as in 1907, the banks fail to act as a whole, their first consideration being the protec­ tion of their own reserves. PAGE 5 Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis History of Federal Reserve Act The conditions surrounding previous panics were entirely different.
    [Show full text]
  • Observations on Regulation D and the Use of Reserve Requirements
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters October 2016 FEDERAL RESERVE Observations on Regulation D and the Use of Reserve Requirements GAO-17-117 October 2016 FEDERAL RESERVE Observations on Regulation D and the Use of Reserve Requirements Highlights of GAO-17-117, a report to congressional requesters Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found Section 19 of the Federal Reserve Act The methods by which depository institutions can implement Regulation D requires depository institutions to (Reserve Requirements of Depository Institutions) include maintaining reserves maintain reserves against a portion of against transaction accounts and enforcing a numeric transfer and withdrawal their transaction accounts solely for the (transaction) limit for savings deposits if they wish to avoid classifying those implementation of monetary policy. accounts as reservable transaction accounts. GAO estimates that 70–78 percent Regulation D implements section 19, of depository institutions limit savings deposit transactions. Other methods and it also requires institutions to limit include automatically transferring balances from transaction (e.g., checking) certain kinds of transfers and accounts to savings deposits in order to reduce reserve requirements. Institutions withdrawals from savings deposits to may choose to maintain transaction account reserves against savings deposits to not more than six per month or eliminate the need to enforce the transaction limit. But some institutions GAO statement cycle if they wish to avoid having to maintain reserves against surveyed indicated that they had operational burdens associated with monitoring these accounts. The transaction limit and enforcing the transaction limit (for example, 63–73 percent cited challenges, allows the Federal Reserve to such as creating forms and converting and closing accounts).
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Van Buren: the Greatest American President
    SUBSCRIBE NOW AND RECEIVE CRISIS AND LEVIATHAN* FREE! “The Independent Review does not accept “The Independent Review is pronouncements of government officials nor the excellent.” conventional wisdom at face value.” —GARY BECKER, Noble Laureate —JOHN R. MACARTHUR, Publisher, Harper’s in Economic Sciences Subscribe to The Independent Review and receive a free book of your choice* such as the 25th Anniversary Edition of Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government, by Founding Editor Robert Higgs. This quarterly journal, guided by co-editors Christopher J. Coyne, and Michael C. Munger, and Robert M. Whaples offers leading-edge insights on today’s most critical issues in economics, healthcare, education, law, history, political science, philosophy, and sociology. Thought-provoking and educational, The Independent Review is blazing the way toward informed debate! Student? Educator? Journalist? Business or civic leader? Engaged citizen? This journal is for YOU! *Order today for more FREE book options Perfect for students or anyone on the go! The Independent Review is available on mobile devices or tablets: iOS devices, Amazon Kindle Fire, or Android through Magzter. INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE, 100 SWAN WAY, OAKLAND, CA 94621 • 800-927-8733 • [email protected] PROMO CODE IRA1703 Martin Van Buren The Greatest American President —————— ✦ —————— JEFFREY ROGERS HUMMEL resident Martin Van Buren does not usually receive high marks from histori- ans. Born of humble Dutch ancestry in December 1782 in the small, upstate PNew York village of Kinderhook, Van Buren gained admittance to the bar in 1803 without benefit of higher education. Building on a successful country legal practice, he became one of the Empire State’s most influential and prominent politi- cians while the state was surging ahead as the country’s wealthiest and most populous.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Banking in the U.S. (9/30/2010) Econ 310-004
    History of Banking in the U.S. (9/30/2010) Econ 310‐004 Definitions • independent treasury – separation of bank and state • laissez faire – transactions between private parties are free from state intervention, including restrictive regulations, taxes, tariffs and enforced monopolies • mercantilism – alliance between government and certain privileged merchants • interstate branch banking – the ability of a bank to have branches in more than one state • intrastate branch banking – the ability of a bank to have multiple branches in the same state • unit banking – no interstate or intrastate branching • fractional currency – currency in denominations less than a dollar (e.g., 5¢, 10¢, 25¢, etc.) • bond collateral requirement – dollar for dollar banknote to state bond ratio • wildcat banking – fraudulent banks setup in wilderness that made it very hard to redeem notes • inelastic currency – inability of the system to convert deposits into banknotes Principles • Banking has always been one of the most regulated industries. • Branching allows diversification. o Assets: Without branching banks only loan locally, so when the local economy goes bad, many loans default at once. o Liabilities: Without branching banks only get deposits locally, so when the local economy goes bad, many customers withdraw at once. • The stability of the bank system effects the reserve rate, not the other way around. • Bond collateral requirement led to more bank panics due to inelastic currency. Alexander Hamilton early state banks • Secretary of the Treasury (Washington) • 1776‐1837 • formed United States Mint • regulation at state level • got Morris to form Bank of North America • no general incorporation for banks • started Bank of New York • 9/31 states outlawed banking • architect of 1st bank of the United States • some states setup monopoly banks • killed by Aaron Burr (VP) in a duel • some still chartered banks • 6 states tried deposit/note insurance Andrew Jackson • President of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Policy in the Bretton Woods Era I
    54 I Allan H. Meltzer Allan H. Meltzer is a professor of political economy and public policy at Carnegie Mellon University and is a visiting scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. This paper; the fifth annual Homer Jones Memorial Lecture, was delivered at Washington University in St. Louis on April 8, 1991. Jeffrey Liang provided assistance in preparing this paper The views expressed in this paper are those of Mr Meltzer and do not necessarily reflect official positions of the Federal Reserve System or the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. U.S. Policy in the Bretton Woods Era I T IS A SPECIAL PLEASURE for me to give world now rely on when they want to know the Homer Jones lecture before this distinguish- what has happened to monetary growth and ed audience, many of them Homer’s friends. the growth of other non-monetary aggregates. 1 am persuaded that the publication and wide I I first met Homer in 1964 when he invited me dissemination of these facts in the 1960s and to give a seminar at the Bank. At the time, I was 1970s did much more to get the monetarist case a visiting professor at the University of Chicago, accepted than we usually recognize. 1 don’t think I on leave from Carnegie-Mellon. Karl Brunner Homer was surprised at that outcome. He be- and I had just completed a study of the Federal lieved in the power of ideas, but he believed Reserve’s monetary policy operations for Con- that ideas were made powerful by their cor- gressman Patman’s House Banking Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation D: Reserve Requirements of Depository Institutions
    FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 12 CFR Part 204 Docket No. R-1737; RIN 7100-AG07 Regulation D: Reserve Requirements of Depository Institutions AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking, request for public comment. SUMMARY: The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Board”) proposes to amend its Regulation D (Reserve Requirements of Depository Institutions, 12 CFR Part 204) to eliminate references to an “interest on required reserves” rate and to an “interest on excess reserves” rate and replace them with a reference to a single “interest on reserve balances” rate. The Board also proposes to simplify the formula used to calculate the amount of interest paid on balances maintained by or on behalf of eligible institutions in master accounts at Federal Reserve Banks, and to make other conforming changes. DATES: Comments must be received on or before [INSERT DATE 60 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket Number R-1737; RIN 7100-AG07, by any of the following methods: • Agency Web site: http://www.federalreserve.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments at http://www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/foia/ProposedRegs.cfm. 1 • E-mail: [email protected]. Include the docket number and RIN in the subject line of the message. • Fax: (202) 452-3819 or (202) 452-3102. • Mail: Ann E. Misback, Secretary, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20551. All public comments are available from the Board’s website at http://www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/foia/ProposedRegs.cfm as submitted, unless modified for technical reasons or to remove personally identifiable information at the commenter’s request.
    [Show full text]
  • The Federal Reserve System Purposes & Functions
    PurposeOverview of the Federal Reserve System The Federal Reserve performs five key functions in the public interest to promote the health of the U.S. economy and the stability of the U.S. financial system. The U.S. Approach to Central Banking ................................. 2 The Decentralized System Structure and Its Philosophy ................ 4 The Reserve Banks: A Blend of Private and 1 Governmental Characteristics . 6 vi Overview of the Federal Reserve System T he Federal Reserve System is the central bank of the United States. It performs five general functions to promote the effective operation of the U.S. economy and, more generally, the public interest. The Federal Reserve • conducts the nation’s monetary policy to promote maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates in the U.S. economy; • promotes the stability of the financial system and seeks to minimize and contain systemic risks through active monitoring and engagement in the U.S. and abroad; • promotes the safety and soundness of individual financial institutions and monitors their impact on the financial system as a whole; Figure 1.1. The Federal Reserve System The Federal Reserve is unique among central banks. By statute, Congress provided for a central banking system with public and private characteristics. The System performs five functions in the public interest. 1 U.S. The Federal Central Bank Reserve System 3 Federal 12 Federal Federal Key Reserve Board Reserve Open Market Entities of Governors Banks Committee Helping Fostering Promoting Conducting Supervising 5 maintain the payment and consumer the nation’s and regulating Key stability of settlement protection and monetary nancial the nancial system safety community Functions policy institutions system and efciency development The Federal Reserve System Purposes & Functions 1 • fosters payment and settlement system safety and efficiency through services to the banking industry and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM the First 100 Years
    FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM The First 100 Years A CHAPTER IN THE HISTORY OF CENTRAL BANKING FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM The First 100 Years A Chapter in the History of Central Banking n 1913, Albert Einstein was working on his established the second Bank of the United States. It new theory of gravity, Richard Nixon was was also given a 20-year charter and operated from born, and Franklin D. Roosevelt was sworn 1816 to 1836; however, its charter was not renewed in as assistant secretary of the Navy. It was either. After the charter expired, the United States also the year Woodrow Wilson took the oath endured a series of financial crises during the 19th of office as the 28th President of the United and early 20th centuries. Several factors contributed IStates, intent on advocating progressive reform to the crises, including a number of bank failures, and change. One of his biggest reforms occurred which generated waves of bank panics and on December 23, 1913, when he signed the Federal economic instability.2 Reserve Act into law. This landmark legislation When Jay Cooke and Company, the nation’s created the Federal Reserve System, the nation’s largest bank, failed in 1873, a panic erupted, leading central bank.1 to runs on other financial institutions. Within months, the nation’s economic problems deepened as silver A Need for Stability prices dropped after the Coinage Act of 1873 was Why was a central bank needed? The nation passed, which dampened the interests of U.S. silver had tried twice before to establish a central bank miners and led to a recession that lasted until 1879.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Banking Act of 1933
    [Public—No. 1—73d C o n g r e ss ] IH. R. 1491] AN ACT To provide relief la the existing national emergency in banking, and for other purposes; Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Con­ gress hereby declares that a serious emergency exists and that it is imperatively necessary speedily to put into effect remedies of uniform national application. TITLE I Section 1. The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations heretofore or hereafter taken, promulgated, made, or issued by the President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury since March 4, 1933, pursuant to the authority conferred by subdivision (b) of section 5 of the Act of October 6, 1917, as amended, arc hereby approved and confirmed. S ec. 2. Subdivision ( b ) of section 5 of the Act of October 0, 1917 (40 Stafc. L. 411), as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows: “ (b) During time of war or during any other period of national emergency declared by the President, the President may, through any agency that he may designate, or otherwise, investigate, regulate, or prohibit, under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe, by means of licenses or otherwise, any transactions in foreign exchange, transfers of credit between or payments by banking institutions as defined by the President, and export, hoarding, melting, or ear­ marking of gold or silver coin or bullion or currency, by any person 'within the United States or any place subject to the jurisdiction thereof; and the President may require any person engaged in any transaction referred to in this subdivision to furnish under oath, complete information relative thereto, including the production of any books of account, contracts, letters or other papers, in connec­ tion therewith in the custody or control of such person, either before or after such transaction is completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Antebellum Banking Regulation: a Comparative Approach
    ANTEBELLUM BANKING REGULATION: A COMPARATIVE APPROACH DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Alka Gandhi, M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 2003 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Richard H. Steckel, Advisor Professor Paul Evans ________________________ Advisor Professor J. Huston McCulloch Economics Graduate Program ABSTRACT Extensive historical and contemporary studies establish important links between financial systems and economic development. Despite the importance of this research area and the extent of prior efforts, numerous interesting questions remain about the consequences of alternative regulatory regimes for the health of the financial sector. As a dynamic period of economic and financial evolution, which was accompanied by diverse banking regulations across states, the antebellum era provides a valuable laboratory for study. This dissertation utilizes a rich data set of balance sheets from antebellum banks in four U.S. states, Massachusetts, Ohio, Louisiana and Tennessee, to examine the relative impacts of preventative banking regulation on bank performance. Conceptual models of financial regulation are used to identify the motivations behind each state’s regulation and how it changed over time. Next, a duration model is employed to model the odds of bank failure and to determine the impact that regulation had on the ability of a bank to remain in operation. Finally, the estimates from the duration model are used to perform a counterfactual that assesses the impact on the odds of bank failure when imposing one state’s regulation on another state, ceteris paribus. The results indicate that states did enact regulation that was superior to alternate contemporaneous banking regulation, with respect to the ability to maintain the banking system.
    [Show full text]
  • Once Bitten, Twice Shy: Rethinking the Federal Reserve’S Independence and Monetary Policy in the U.S
    ONCE BITTEN, TWICE SHY: RETHINKING THE FEDERAL RESERVE’S INDEPENDENCE AND MONETARY POLICY IN THE U.S. by Niveditha Prabakaran B.S. Mathematics-Economics, B.A. Politics and Philosophy School of Arts and Sciences 2011 Submitted to the Undergraduate Faculty of School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2011 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This thesis was presented by Niveditha Prabakaran It was defended on April 20, 2011 and approved by Steven Husted, Professor, Economics, University of Pittsburgh Thomas Rawski, Professor, Economics, University of Pittsburgh James Burnham, Professor, School of Business, Duquesne University Thesis Director: Werner Troesken, Professor, Economics, University of Pittsburgh ii ONCE BITTEN, TWICE SHY: RETHINKING THE FEDERAL RESERVE’S INDEPENDENCE AND MONETARY POLICY IN THE U.S. Niveditha Prabakaran, B.Phil University of Pittsburgh, 2011 Copyright © by Niveditha Prabakaran 2011 iii Once Bitten, Twice shy: Rethinking the Federal Reserve’s Independence and Monetary Policy in the U.S. Niveditha Prabakaran, B.Phil University of Pittsburgh, 2011 It is widely believed that the Federal Reserve played a central role in bringing about the biggest catastrophe in American history—the Great Depression. The literature is extensive in seeking to provide an explanation for the Federal Reserve’s policy errors. This paper offers a new interpretation on why such an event occurred by studying a heretofore-unexamined landmark court case. In 1928, a private citizen filed suit against the Federal Reserve Bank of New York for increasing discount rates; he sough a court injunction that would force the Federal Reserve to decrease rates.
    [Show full text]
  • OMW Sprague (The Man Who" Wrote the Book" on Financial Crises) And
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES O.M.W. SPRAGUE (THE MAN WHO “WROTE THE BOOK” ON FINANCIAL CRISES) AND THE FOUNDING OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE Hugh Rockoff Working Paper 19758 http://www.nber.org/papers/w19758 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 December 2013 This paper was prepared for a conference on alternatives to the Federal Reserve held at George Mason University on November 1, 2013. I thank the organizers of the conference George Selgin and Larry H. White; my discussant, David Wheelock; and other participants in the discussion for many helpful comments. Elmus Wicker and Eugene White read an earlier draft and made many helpful suggestions. The opinions expressed here and the remaining errors are mine. The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2013 by Hugh Rockoff. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. O.M.W. Sprague (the Man who “Wrote the Book” on Financial Crises) and the Founding of the Federal Reserve Hugh Rockoff NBER Working Paper No. 19758 December 2013 JEL No. B26,N1 ABSTRACT O.M.W. Sprague was America’s leading expert on financial crises when America was debating establishing the Federal Reserve.
    [Show full text]