Once Bitten, Twice Shy: Rethinking the Federal Reserve’S Independence and Monetary Policy in the U.S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Once Bitten, Twice Shy: Rethinking the Federal Reserve’S Independence and Monetary Policy in the U.S ONCE BITTEN, TWICE SHY: RETHINKING THE FEDERAL RESERVE’S INDEPENDENCE AND MONETARY POLICY IN THE U.S. by Niveditha Prabakaran B.S. Mathematics-Economics, B.A. Politics and Philosophy School of Arts and Sciences 2011 Submitted to the Undergraduate Faculty of School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2011 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This thesis was presented by Niveditha Prabakaran It was defended on April 20, 2011 and approved by Steven Husted, Professor, Economics, University of Pittsburgh Thomas Rawski, Professor, Economics, University of Pittsburgh James Burnham, Professor, School of Business, Duquesne University Thesis Director: Werner Troesken, Professor, Economics, University of Pittsburgh ii ONCE BITTEN, TWICE SHY: RETHINKING THE FEDERAL RESERVE’S INDEPENDENCE AND MONETARY POLICY IN THE U.S. Niveditha Prabakaran, B.Phil University of Pittsburgh, 2011 Copyright © by Niveditha Prabakaran 2011 iii Once Bitten, Twice shy: Rethinking the Federal Reserve’s Independence and Monetary Policy in the U.S. Niveditha Prabakaran, B.Phil University of Pittsburgh, 2011 It is widely believed that the Federal Reserve played a central role in bringing about the biggest catastrophe in American history—the Great Depression. The literature is extensive in seeking to provide an explanation for the Federal Reserve’s policy errors. This paper offers a new interpretation on why such an event occurred by studying a heretofore-unexamined landmark court case. In 1928, a private citizen filed suit against the Federal Reserve Bank of New York for increasing discount rates; he sough a court injunction that would force the Federal Reserve to decrease rates. The courts found in the System’s favor. In 1929, he appealed the case, which was dismissed due to a failure in enjoining the Federal Reserve Board as an indispensible party. The judge during the time further wrote an opinion, in which he clarified that the Board rather than the Banks had true authority within the Federal Reserve System. This paper looks at how these two decisions affected Federal Reserve policy between 1929-1933. It argues that the de- politicization of the Federal Reserve coupled with implicit judicial sanction allowed it to act on its flawed ideology without fear of political recrimination. The paper also examines the impact of the Great Depression on the Federal Reserve’s independence today. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .................................................................................................................................. VII 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 THE FEDERAL RESERVE’S CONSTITUTIONALITY ............................................. 7 3.0 THE TRIALS AND TRIBULATIONS OF A YOUNG FED ....................................... 15 4.0 THE LEAD-UP TO THE STOCK MARKET CRASH ............................................... 23 5.0 PLUNGING INTO THE GREAT DEPRESSION ........................................................ 35 6.0 A THOUGHT EXPERIMENT ....................................................................................... 43 7.0 THE DEARTH OF CENTRAL BANK INDEPENDENCE IN THE U.S. .................. 47 8.0 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................. 58 APPENDIX A ............................................................................................................................... 63 APPENDIX B ............................................................................................................................... 66 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................................ 68 v LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Historical Real GDP in the U.S. (logged) from 1790 to Present .................................... 2 Figure 2: Central Bank Independence and Average Inflation (from Alesina and Summers [1993]) ... 49 Figure 3: Inflation Rates in the U.S. from 1900 to present .......................................................... 51 Figure 4: Real GDP in the U.S. from 1900 to present (logged) ................................................... 52 vi PREFACE To my committee, Dr. Burnham, Dr. Husted and Dr. Rawski, and especially to my advisor Dr. Troesken, I would like to thank all of you for your patience, support and guidance in helping me complete this Bachelor of Philosophy. I would not have found this interesting case and fascinating legal history without my advisor, whose class I was fortuitous enough to take. Additionally, I would like to thank my family and friends; this thesis would not have been possible without their relentless encouragement and unwavering belief in me. They accompanied me to coffee shops, libraries and other venues and put up with me during my most stressful times, and for that I shall always be beholden to them. Finally, I would like to thank the faculty and administration at the Honors College. This work would not have been possible without their guidance, especially during my formative years at the University of Pittsburgh. They truly enriched my undergraduate experience. Dedication To the late Dean of the Honors College, G. Alec Stewart a.k.a “Doc.” Doc, thank you for entering my life when you did; you changed my thinking for the better. I am grateful to have known you and very much missed your presence this last year at Pitt. vii 1.0 INTRODUCTION “Ours is a land rich in resources...filled with millions of happy homes; blessed with comfort and opportunity... In no nation are the fruits of accomplishment more secure… I have no fears for the future of our country. It is bright with hope.” ~Herbert Hoover, Inaugural Address, March 4, 1929, Washington D.C.1 The above quote from President Hoover’s Inaugural Address was recorded seven months before the stock market crash that would rock the U.S. economy; by the end of his term in 1932, the United States would have been plunged into a depression that left one in every four unemployed and significantly reduced the nation’s wealth. From the experience of a “higher degree of comfort and security than ever existed before in the history of the world,” the United States entered a severe depression of a magnitude never experienced by the U.S. economy before or since.2 The graph on the following page shows the U.S. real GDP; one can see the clean, log- linear relationship of GDP, except for the period between 1929 and 1933. Between the peak in 1929 and the trough in 1933, real GDP had declined by about 37%. 1 Hoover, Herbert. Inaugural Address. Washington, D.C. 4 March 1929. <http://www.hooverassociation.org/hoover/ speeches/inaugural_address.php> 2 Ibid. 3 Friedman, Milton and Anna J. Schwartz. A Monetary History of the United States, 1867 to 1960. Princeton: 1 U.S. Real GDP (1790 to 2010) 7.5 7.25 7 6.75 6.5 6.25 6 5.75 5.5 Logged GDP 5.25 5 4.75 4.5 4.25 4 3.75 3.5 1790 1805 1820 1835 1850 1865 1880 1895 1910 1925 1940 1955 1970 1985 2000 In Years Figure 1: Historical Real GDP in the U.S. (logged) from 1790 to Present Data from: Johnston, Louis and Samuel H. Williamson, "What Was the U.S. GDP Then?" MeasuringWorth, 2010. <http://www.measuringworth.org/usgdp/>. 2 The literature on explanations for this calamity is extensive; the standard argument holds that money supply played a central role in exacerbating the magnitude of the recession. According to Friedman and Schwartz (1971), the Federal Reserve System (referred to as the “Fed” from here on), which had been entrusted with the authority to mitigate financial turmoil and ensure economic prosperity, actually caused the historically unprecedented contraction, which they call “a tragic testimonial to the importance of monetary forces.”3 Whether external factors forced the recession or it occurred because of the Fed’s policies, it is nonetheless widely accepted today that the Fed’s erroneous policy significantly worsened the recession, especially in its failure to fulfill its role as the lender of last resort. This has led to extensive research into the reasons for the Fed’s policy failures. In their book A Monetary History of the United States, 1867 to 1960, Friedman and Schwartz (1971) argue that the death of Governor Strong of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in 1928 left a power vacuum within the Fed because Harrison, who replaced strong in 1928, was not a dominant personality and was unable to lead the Fed during its time of need. This resulted in a shift of power to the Board, which did not have traditions of strong leadership. They contend that this lack of leadership prevented the Fed from taking decisive and prompt action, as it had done in the 1920s under Strong; thus, policy from 1929-1933 was “passive, defensive, [and] hesitant” and ultimately, ineffective.4 In A History of the Federal Reserve, Volume 1: 1913-1951, Meltzer (2003) argues that Strong’s death would not have been changed the outcome of policy during this time because by 1930, the rest of the reserve banks and the Board blamed the speculation of 1928-29 on what 3 Friedman, Milton and Anna J. Schwartz. A Monetary History of the United States, 1867 to 1960. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1971. p. 300 4 Ibid., p. 411 3 they viewed as Strong’s over-expansionary policy in 1924-27. Meltzer contends that this diminished the New York Bank’s standing during policy-making
Recommended publications
  • Martin Van Buren: the Greatest American President
    SUBSCRIBE NOW AND RECEIVE CRISIS AND LEVIATHAN* FREE! “The Independent Review does not accept “The Independent Review is pronouncements of government officials nor the excellent.” conventional wisdom at face value.” —GARY BECKER, Noble Laureate —JOHN R. MACARTHUR, Publisher, Harper’s in Economic Sciences Subscribe to The Independent Review and receive a free book of your choice* such as the 25th Anniversary Edition of Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government, by Founding Editor Robert Higgs. This quarterly journal, guided by co-editors Christopher J. Coyne, and Michael C. Munger, and Robert M. Whaples offers leading-edge insights on today’s most critical issues in economics, healthcare, education, law, history, political science, philosophy, and sociology. Thought-provoking and educational, The Independent Review is blazing the way toward informed debate! Student? Educator? Journalist? Business or civic leader? Engaged citizen? This journal is for YOU! *Order today for more FREE book options Perfect for students or anyone on the go! The Independent Review is available on mobile devices or tablets: iOS devices, Amazon Kindle Fire, or Android through Magzter. INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE, 100 SWAN WAY, OAKLAND, CA 94621 • 800-927-8733 • [email protected] PROMO CODE IRA1703 Martin Van Buren The Greatest American President —————— ✦ —————— JEFFREY ROGERS HUMMEL resident Martin Van Buren does not usually receive high marks from histori- ans. Born of humble Dutch ancestry in December 1782 in the small, upstate PNew York village of Kinderhook, Van Buren gained admittance to the bar in 1803 without benefit of higher education. Building on a successful country legal practice, he became one of the Empire State’s most influential and prominent politi- cians while the state was surging ahead as the country’s wealthiest and most populous.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Banking in the U.S. (9/30/2010) Econ 310-004
    History of Banking in the U.S. (9/30/2010) Econ 310‐004 Definitions • independent treasury – separation of bank and state • laissez faire – transactions between private parties are free from state intervention, including restrictive regulations, taxes, tariffs and enforced monopolies • mercantilism – alliance between government and certain privileged merchants • interstate branch banking – the ability of a bank to have branches in more than one state • intrastate branch banking – the ability of a bank to have multiple branches in the same state • unit banking – no interstate or intrastate branching • fractional currency – currency in denominations less than a dollar (e.g., 5¢, 10¢, 25¢, etc.) • bond collateral requirement – dollar for dollar banknote to state bond ratio • wildcat banking – fraudulent banks setup in wilderness that made it very hard to redeem notes • inelastic currency – inability of the system to convert deposits into banknotes Principles • Banking has always been one of the most regulated industries. • Branching allows diversification. o Assets: Without branching banks only loan locally, so when the local economy goes bad, many loans default at once. o Liabilities: Without branching banks only get deposits locally, so when the local economy goes bad, many customers withdraw at once. • The stability of the bank system effects the reserve rate, not the other way around. • Bond collateral requirement led to more bank panics due to inelastic currency. Alexander Hamilton early state banks • Secretary of the Treasury (Washington) • 1776‐1837 • formed United States Mint • regulation at state level • got Morris to form Bank of North America • no general incorporation for banks • started Bank of New York • 9/31 states outlawed banking • architect of 1st bank of the United States • some states setup monopoly banks • killed by Aaron Burr (VP) in a duel • some still chartered banks • 6 states tried deposit/note insurance Andrew Jackson • President of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Fed Independence
    FEDERALRESERVE The Evolution of Fed Independence BY STEPHEN SLIVINSKI oday there is a consensus Wars, Depression, and How monetary policy that a central bank can best Dependence T contribute to good economic When the United States entered and central bank performance by pursuing price stabil- World War I in April 1917, the Federal ity — and that it should remain inde- Reserve almost instantly became the autonomy came pendent from political forces. In the primary vehicle for financing the war case of price stability, this understand- effort. The main function of the Fed of age ing evolved over decades of experi- during those war years was to lend ence. The notion of independence of money to banks to purchase “Liberty the central bank was more difficult to Loans” bonds from the U.S. Treasury. fulfill. They loaned the money at a discount- The original conception of the ed rate — not coincidentally lower Federal Reserve System when it was than the interest rate on the war bonds created in 1913 was meant to continue — to entice bond purchasers. After the spirit of the “independent treasury the war, the Federal Reserve Bank of system” that existed in the pre-Fed New York remained the official era. That system assumed that the U.S. fiscal agent of the U.S. Treasury Treasury would store its gold and Department. assets in its own vaults lest it unduly In the post-war years, the Fed influence the markets for credit and busied itself with maintaining the money. Ideally, Treasury meddling in newly reconstructed gold standard. what passed for monetary policy at the Its missteps in the wake of the stock time was to be avoided.
    [Show full text]
  • Antebellum Banking Regulation: a Comparative Approach
    ANTEBELLUM BANKING REGULATION: A COMPARATIVE APPROACH DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Alka Gandhi, M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 2003 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Richard H. Steckel, Advisor Professor Paul Evans ________________________ Advisor Professor J. Huston McCulloch Economics Graduate Program ABSTRACT Extensive historical and contemporary studies establish important links between financial systems and economic development. Despite the importance of this research area and the extent of prior efforts, numerous interesting questions remain about the consequences of alternative regulatory regimes for the health of the financial sector. As a dynamic period of economic and financial evolution, which was accompanied by diverse banking regulations across states, the antebellum era provides a valuable laboratory for study. This dissertation utilizes a rich data set of balance sheets from antebellum banks in four U.S. states, Massachusetts, Ohio, Louisiana and Tennessee, to examine the relative impacts of preventative banking regulation on bank performance. Conceptual models of financial regulation are used to identify the motivations behind each state’s regulation and how it changed over time. Next, a duration model is employed to model the odds of bank failure and to determine the impact that regulation had on the ability of a bank to remain in operation. Finally, the estimates from the duration model are used to perform a counterfactual that assesses the impact on the odds of bank failure when imposing one state’s regulation on another state, ceteris paribus. The results indicate that states did enact regulation that was superior to alternate contemporaneous banking regulation, with respect to the ability to maintain the banking system.
    [Show full text]
  • OMW Sprague (The Man Who" Wrote the Book" on Financial Crises) And
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES O.M.W. SPRAGUE (THE MAN WHO “WROTE THE BOOK” ON FINANCIAL CRISES) AND THE FOUNDING OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE Hugh Rockoff Working Paper 19758 http://www.nber.org/papers/w19758 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 December 2013 This paper was prepared for a conference on alternatives to the Federal Reserve held at George Mason University on November 1, 2013. I thank the organizers of the conference George Selgin and Larry H. White; my discussant, David Wheelock; and other participants in the discussion for many helpful comments. Elmus Wicker and Eugene White read an earlier draft and made many helpful suggestions. The opinions expressed here and the remaining errors are mine. The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2013 by Hugh Rockoff. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. O.M.W. Sprague (the Man who “Wrote the Book” on Financial Crises) and the Founding of the Federal Reserve Hugh Rockoff NBER Working Paper No. 19758 December 2013 JEL No. B26,N1 ABSTRACT O.M.W. Sprague was America’s leading expert on financial crises when America was debating establishing the Federal Reserve.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Monetary Commission: American Banking’S Debt to Europe
    1 The National Monetary Commission: American Banking’s Debt to Europe Zack Saravay Honors Thesis Submitted to the Department of History, Georgetown University Advisor: Professor Katherine Benton-Cohen Honors Program Chairs: Professors Amy Leonard and Katherine Benton-Cohen 8 May 2017 2 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................................ 3 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 4 HISTORIOGRAPHICAL REVIEW .................................................................................................................. 6 Creation of the Federal Reserve ........................................................................................................... 7 Progressive Era Economics ................................................................................................................ 13 BACKGROUND – THE NATIONAL BANKING SYSTEM (1863-1908) ......................................................... 15 CHAPTER I. ORIGINS OF THE NMC (1908) ...................................................................................... 25 THE BATTLE FOR CURRENCY REFORM ................................................................................................... 25 THE ALDRICH-VREELAND ACT ............................................................................................................... 28 COMPOSITION AND SCOPE OF
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Banking History from the First Bank of the United States Through the Panic of 1907 by B
    Outline of Banking History From the First Bank of the United States Through the Panic of 1907 By B. H. BECKHART Columbia University United States was particularly The entire capital was subscribed THEfortunate in having as its first within two hours on the day the sub- Secretary of the Treasury a veritable scription books were thrown open, and genius, whose program of fiscal reform the Bank was ready to begin business quickly placed the new republic on a on December 12, 1791, with Thomas sound financial basis. As an essential Willing as president.6 From the very part of his program, Hamilton urged outset, the Bank proved to be a great the establishment of a National Bank success, in providing the country with in a report to Congress, dated Decem- a sound and elastic currency, in supply- ber 1~,1~’90. Since the economic signif- ing the needed banking facilities, and icance of banks was then but crudely in preventing any excess issue of state understood, Hamilton, in this now fa- bank notes by having such state notes mous document, first indicated the as were in its possession redeemed. In numerous advantages resulting from the performance of its fiscal functions, banking in general and from a National it transferred government funds and Bank in particular, taking occasion to provided a safe depositary for them; it dispel some of the current erroneous also helped to collect the revenues and ideas on the subject.’ After showing provided the bullion needed by the that no one of the three banking insti- mint in coinage.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States Independent Reasury System
    "'I: ,~~ THE STORAG! UNITED STATES INDEPENDENT REASURY SYSTEM FEDERAL HALL, N.Y. December 30, 1968 The United States Independent Treasury System Federal Hall, N.H.S. - New York by Dr. John D.R. Platt DIVISION OF HISTORY Office Of Archeology And Historic Preservation December 30, 1968 National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior THE UNITED STATES INDEPENDENT TREASURY SYSTEM: ITS SIGNIFICANCE AND APPLICATION TO FEDERAL HALL•• WITH A NOTE ON THE CUSTOMS HClJSE PERIOD by ·Historian John D. R. Platt December 30, 1968 Background and Evaluation Study · Preface This study, prepared under RSP FEHA•H-2, brings together in narrative form, from an extenaive range of secondary and printed source materials, data needed for the development of museum exhibits on the New York Sub-Treasury and Customs in the building at the corner of Wall and Broad Streets in New York City. It has been made as complete as time had permitted. A complex subject, the Independent Treasury System gauged America's economic development during its years of operation. The Customs is a subject on quite another level, lacking an extensive liter­ ature, although tariff policy has been the subject of much eco­ nomics and historical writing. The data offered here touches on the essential topics to be considered among those concerning the 1842-1862 period of occupancy. i CONTENTS Page Preface i 1. How the Independent Treasury System Came into Being and What It Was 1 2. How Effectually the Independent Treasury System Operated 18 3. The New York Sub-Treasury and Its Functions 35 4. The Sub-Treasury's Wall Street Locale 46 5.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Monetary Policy!
    The Politics of Monetary Policy Alberto Alesina Andrea Stella Harvard University and IGIER Harvard University September: 2009 Preliminary and Incomplete Abstract In this paper we critically review the literature on the political econ- omy of monetary policy emphasizing the questions opened by the recent …nancial crisis. We begin with a discussion of the issue of rules versus discretion. We then examine the independence of Central banks both in normal times and in crisis and in relation to the political cycles. Finally we address international institutional issues concerning the feasibility, op- timality and political sustainabilty of currency unions in which more than one country share the same currency. A brief review of the Euro experi- ence concludes the paper. 1 Introduction Had we written this chapter before the summer of 2007 we would have concluded that there was much agreement amongst economists about the optimal institu- tional arrangements for monetary policy. Sure, for the specialists there were many open questions, but for most outsiders (including non monetary econo- mists) many issues seemed to be settled. An hypothetical paper written (at least by us, but we believe by many others) before the summer of 2007 would have concluded that: 1)Monetary policy is better left to independent Central Banks at harms length from the politicians and the treasury. 2)Most central banks should (and must do) follow some sort of in‡ation targeting; that is they look at in‡ation as an indicator of when to loosen up or tighten up. Certain Central banks do it more explicitly than others (say the UK Central Bank versus the Fed), some other Central Banks still look at quantity of money and or credit indicators (like the so called "second pillar" of the ECB, the …rst being in‡ation) but in‡ation targeting had basically "won".
    [Show full text]
  • The Appropriations and Budget Process for Multilateral
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-02804-3 - Money and Banks in the American Political System Kathryn C. Lavelle Index More information Index ABA.SeeAmerican Bankers and regulation of derivatives, 127 Association American Enterprise Institute, 23 adjustable-rate mortgages, 54, 180 American International Group (AIG), 193, 255 Administrative Procedure Act, 124, 150 and bailout, 196–197, 199 advocacy coalition, 10 failure of, 195–196 agencies of the federal government, 3, 25, 109. American political culture, 1–2, 31, 249 See also executive branch agencies; by aversion to concentration of economic individual agency power and political authority, 6, 13, and financial crisis of 2008, 188, 217 28–29, 40, 151–152 and policy process, 19–20, 110 defined, 4–5 agency capture, 8, 31, 159, 249.Seealso and institutional arrangement, 187 revolving door; lobbying; lobbyists and opposition to banks, 54–55 defined, 14–15, 130–133 American revolution, 40, 48 and relief for individuals, 206 American Securitization Forum, 22 agency debt, 140–141, 243, 255 Americans for Financial Reform, 260 AIG.SeeAmerican International Group America’s Community Bankers, 133 Aldrich, Nelson, 44, 45 appropriations bills, 90 Aldrich Plan, 45 appropriations committees, 92 Aldrich-Vreeland Act, 44, 45 ARMs.Seeadjustable-rate mortgages Allison’s models of the bureaucratic process, asset-backed commercial paper, 78 4–5, 6, 15.Seealsobureaucratic auto industry, 201 politics paradigm bailouts, 188, 202 and action channels, 83–85 success in lobbying Congress, 216 and actions across time
    [Show full text]
  • Quantitative Easing in the 1930S October 2018 Christopher Hanes Department of Economics State University of New York at Binghamt
    Quantitative Easing in the 1930s October 2018 Christopher Hanes Department of Economics State University of New York at Binghamton P.O. Box 6000 Binghamton, NY 13902 (607) 777-2572 [email protected] Abstract: During the 1934-39 recovery from the U.S. Great Depression, overnight interest rates were usually at a lower bound while American monetary authorities followed policies related to today's debates on quantitative easing (QE): they tried to stabilize Treasury yields with open market operations; they created rapid growth in high-powered money; and they allowed transitory factors to affect high-powered money. I find relationships between these policies and bond yields that reveal a portfolio effect of short- duration asset supply on term premiums, and help explain why trend high-powered money growth was associated with recovery of real activity over 1934-39. JEL codes: E43, E52, G12, N12, N22 Acknowledgements. For comments and suggestions, thanks to William English, John Fernald, James D. Hamilton, Barry Jones, Edward Nelson, Gary Richardson, Eric Swanson, Susan Wolcott and Wei Xiao; to participants in the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco conference “The Past and Future of Monetary Policy,” March 2013; the Yale Economic History workshop; NBER DAE Summer 2014; Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland workshop; Rutgers University Economic History Workshop. During the post-2009 recovery from the Great Recession, the Federal Reserve tried "quantitative easing" (QE) to influence bond yields while short-term rates appeared to be near a lower bound. In QE a central bank acquires long-term bonds, usually Treasury bonds, in exchange for newly-created reserve balances.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Financial Reform on Federal Reserve Autonomy
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Shull, Bernard Working Paper The impact of financial reform on federal reserve autonomy Working Paper, No. 735 Provided in Cooperation with: Levy Economics Institute of Bard College Suggested Citation: Shull, Bernard (2012) : The impact of financial reform on federal reserve autonomy, Working Paper, No. 735, Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, Annandale-on- Hudson, NY This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/79448 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten
    [Show full text]