DOCSLIB.ORG

Toronto District School Board (TDSB) Planning and Central Staff PART Members

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Toronto District School Board (TDSB) Planning and Central Staff PART Members Regal Road Jr. PS, Perth Avenue Jr. PS, Carleton Village Jr. & Sr. SWA, Rawlinson CS, Brock PS, Winona Drive Sr. PS Program Area Review Team (PART) Public Meeting Monday, April 16, 2018 6:00 – 8:00 PM Oakwood Collegiate Institute - Auditorium Marit Stiles (Trustee - Ward 9), Shelly Laskin (Trustee – Ward 11), Sandra Tondat (Superintendent of Education -LN27 and PART Chair), Jane Phillips-Long (Superintendent of Education - LN26), Central Joyce Kwong (Educational Planning Officer), William Wallace (Educational Planning Coordinator), Paul Chang (Architectural Membership: Coordinator – Facility Services) Kirsten Johnston (Coordinator-Teaching & Learning – French as a Second Language) School Michael Morris (Regal Road), Andrea McPherson (Perth Avenue), Lorelei Eccleston (Carleton Village), Kim Stark (Rawlinson), Administrators: Lindsay Borden (Winona Drive) Stephanie Ayers & Natalie Stickle (Regal Road), Amanda Kearney & Melanie Medeiros-Sims (Carleton Village), Luke Andrews & Parent Council Alanna Burtch (Rawlinson), Cecile Farnum (Brock), Matt Forrest (Parent Rep. – French as a Second Language Advisory Council) Chair/Reps: Attendees: Records indicate that 55 individuals/families signed in. Regrets: Kathleen Garner (Superintendent of Education – LN7), Belinda Longe (Principal – Winona Drive), Beverly Muir (Principal – Brock), Daniel Castaldo (Senior Manager-Planning), Joy Reiter (Centrally Assigned Principal – Special Education - Section 23), Angela Caccamo (Centrally Assigned Principal -Teaching & Learning -FSL), Liz Hoang (Manager- Child Care Services), Kendall Duthie, Charlotte Sepra, Alex Tinker (Parent Reps.- Perth Avenue), Alexis Davies, Christina Leys (Parent Reps. – Rawlinson) Nathan Garcia, Eva Lee, Stephanie Marshall (Parent Reps. – Winona Drive) Item / Presenter Discussion Attachments / Actions / Results Sandra Tondat Acknowledgement of Traditional Lands Welcome and Introductions: Sandra welcomed everyone to the Public Meeting of the Regal Road Jr. PS, Perth Avenue Jr. PS, Carleton Village Jr. & Sr. SWA, Rawlinson CS, Brock PS, Winona Drive Sr. PS Sandra Tondat (Chair) Program Area Review Team (PART) and thanked the attendees for coming out on such a rainy evening. The purpose of the meeting was to present and discuss proposed recommendations to address accommodation pressures at Regal Road Junior Public School, Perth Avenue Junior Public School and their neighbouring schools. Introductions: o Sandra Tondat, Superintendent of Education – LN27 (Regal Road, Carleton Village and Rawlinson) and PART Chair. o Trustee Marit Stiles, Ward 9 (Regal Road, Perth Avenue, Carleton Village, Rawlinson and Brock) and Trustee Shelley Laskin, Ward 11 (Winona Drive) o Jane Phillips-Long, Superintendent of Education - LN26 (Perth Avenue and 1 Item / Presenter Discussion Attachments / Actions / Results Brock). Shared regrets from Kathleen Garner, Superintendent of Education – LN7 (Winona Drive). o PART parent representatives in attendance– acknowledged their hard work. o Matt Forest, parent representative – French as a Second Language Advisory Council (FSLAC) o Toronto District School Board (TDSB) Planning and central staff PART members. o Interpreters Thanked Principal Steve Yee and the staff of Oakwood Collegiate Institute for hosting and Oakwood students, Sara and Val who provided technical/media support during the public meeting. Attendees were told to feel free to interrupt when acronyms were used during the presentation (full title/definition). Setting the Context For reference, please see Regal Road Jr. PS, Perth Avenue Jr. PS, Carleton Village Jr. & PART Public Meeting April Sandra Tondat Sr. PS, Rawlinson CS, Brock PS, and Winona Drive Sr. PS Program Area Review Team 16, 2018 Presentation Public Meeting April 16, 2018 (link to the presentation attached). (slides) Program Area Review Reviewed the TDSB’s Long-Term Program and Accommodation Strategy (LTPAS), webpage: first approved in 2014 (and updated annually), identifies a number of studies to be http://www.tdsb.on.ca/Abou undertaken to resolve existing and future accommodation pressures in the City. t-Us/Strategy- Planning staff and Trustees review every year (slide 4). Planning/Accommodation- The following study is the focus of this PART Exercise: Reviews o Boundary Change Study: explore potential boundary changes involving Under Program Area Carleton Village Jr. & Sr. Sports & Wellness Academy, Regal Road Jr. PS Review (PART), click on and Perth Avenue Jr. PS to achieve an optimal distribution of students the following: “Regal Road across the three schools while mitigating underutilization at Carleton Village Jr PS, Perth Avenue Jr PS, Carleton Village Jr & Sr Jr. & Sr. Sports and Wellness Academy. SWA, Rawlinson CS, Brock o Scope of the PART can be expanded if new and/or other issues are PS, and Winona Drive Sr identified. PS o Link to the Regal Road Jr. PS, Perth Avenue Jr. PS, Carleton Village Jr. & Sr. SWA, Rawlinson CS, Brock PS, and Winona Drive Sr. PS Program Area Review webpage attached. Reviewed LTPAS Program and Accommodation drivers (slide 5). o Program Drivers: program choice, equity, fair access to specialized program and schools, and viability. 2 Item / Presenter Discussion Attachments / Actions / Results o Accommodation Drivers: good distribution of schools, minimal transitions, minimal use of portables, service integration, good utilization, distinct attendance areas, and efficient use of space. Question (Q): Are the ‘drivers’ weighted or is there a rubric? Answer (A): Try to meet all drivers. There are instances when some drivers are more important. Program Area Review Outlined Program Area Review Process (slides 6 and 7). Process Study identified for 2017- 2018 Sandra Tondat September 2017: study approved by the Central Accommodation Team (CAT) made up of Board staff. Local Feasibility Team (LFT) formed (membership includes directly affected superintendents, principals, trustees, planning and other central staff as required). October 2017 to February 2018: LFT met three times. Looked at status quo, enrolment projections, reviewed data and discussed impacts of any proposed changes. LFT agreed on recommendation and reported back to CAT March 2018: CAT approval to move to a PART. March to April 2018: Program Area Review Team (PART) – currently at this stage in the process. Role of the PART: o PART members receive data and ask questions. o PART members review data, discuss impacts, and make a recommendation to proceed or not to proceed with any change. o PART could ask for other recommendations or request other information and data. o PART’s role is advisory – will make recommendations to inform staff /or Board members. Recommendations may be modified by staff and/ or Board members (CAT, Planning & Priorities, Board of Trustees). o Goal of the PART is to reach consensus. If consensus can’t be reached, move to a vote. Only the principal and parent representative vote (central staff and trustees do not vote). 1 parent vote for each school as not every school has 2 representatives present. In the event of a tie, the superintendent (PART Chair) casts the deciding vote. o 3 PART working meetings and 1community meeting to receive broader feedback (2 meetings prior to the community meeting and 1 after). o April 26 PART working meeting – feedback from community meeting. PART finalizes recommendations. 3 Item / Presenter Discussion Attachments / Actions / Results o Once PART has reached a decision, superintendent and staff prepare a report with recommendations to go to the Central Accommodation Team (CAT). o PART’s role is advisory – will make recommendations to inform staff /or Board members. Recommendations may be modified by staff and/ or Board members (CAT, Planning & Priorities, Board of Trustees). May to June 2018: After considering the committee’s recommendations, central staff shall present its own recommendations to the Planning and Priorities Committee (June 13) and then to a regular meeting of the Board of Trustees (June 20). Delegation Request form o Delegation Process - June 13, 2018 meeting of the TDSB’s Planning and provided at the meeting. Priorities Committee: PART public meeting attendees informed that Delegation Process - community members may have the opportunity to present their comments, Addressing Committees suggestions, etc. to the Planning and Priorities Committee by submitting a written statement or speaking. Link to delegation process attached. PART public meeting attendees had the opportunity to write questions, suggestions, comments on sticky notes and place on boundary maps outside the auditorium after the presentation. Feedback will be reviewed by staff and PART members. Local Feasibility Team’s Sandra invited Joyce Kwong, Educational Planner to present the LFT’s recommended (LFT) Recommended scenario, information, data, status quo projections and the impact of the scenario on the Scenario schools involved in the PART. Joyce Kwong Joyce presented the LFT’s recommended scenario (as amended as per PART feedback). Junior Attendance Area Changes (slide 8) o Boundary change between Regal Road Jr. PS and Carleton Village Jr. & Sr. SWA to direct portion of Regal Road’s junior attendance area to Carleton Village. o Boundary change between Perth Avenue Jr. PS and Carleton Village Jr. & Sr. SWA to direct portion of Perth Avenue’s junior attendance area to Carleton Village. o Boundary change between Regal Road Jr. PS and Rawlinson CS to direct portion of Regal Road’s junior attendance area to Rawlinson CS. Joyce outlined the grandparenting
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Assessing Tree Health and Species in the Gentrifying Neighbourhood of the Junction Triangle in Toronto, Ontario
    ASSESSING TREE HEALTH AND SPECIES IN THE GENTRIFYING NEIGHBOURHOOD OF THE JUNCTION TRIANGLE IN TORONTO, ONTARIO By Ritam Sen Bachelor of Arts, Ryerson University, 2014 A thesis presented to Ryerson University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Applied Science in the Program of Environmental Applied Science and Management Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2018 ©Ritam Sen, 2018 Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revision, as accepted by my examiners. I authorize Ryerson University to lend this thesis to other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I further authorize Ryerson University to reproduce this thesis by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Assessing Tree Health and Species in the Gentrifying Neighbourhood of the Junction Triangle in Toronto, Ontario Ritam Sen Master of Applied Science, 2018 Environmental Applied Science and Management Ryerson University Abstract: The purpose of this study is to examine the number, health, and species of trees in the gentrifying neighbourhood of the Junction Triangle. In this research, the tree inventory and questionnaire method were used. The questionnaire results show that respondents who moved in prior to 2007 view gentrification more negatively than residents who moved in after. The study found that there is a net growth of trees in the study area.
    [Show full text]
  • Beside the Tracks: Knitting the Rail Corridor Back to the Community - Ward 18
    BESIDE THE TRACKS: KNITTING THE RAIL CORRIDOR BACK TO THE COMMUNITY - WARD 18 NOVEMBER|2013 Copyright © Novemeber 2013 City of Toronto Published by: City of Toronto, City Planning - Toronto and East York District 1TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 5 Introduction 8 Existing Conditions 16 Parks, Forestry and Recreation 28 Transportation and Public Realm 34 Heritage 44 Urban Design 48 Community Services and Facilities 50 Conclusion 58 BESIDE THE TRACKS: Knitting the Rail Corridor back to the Community | 3 4 | BESIDE THE TRACKS: Knitting the Rail Corridor back to the Community 00EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Like most of Toronto’s inner city rail corridors, the Georgetown C N R / C P R Rail Corridor along the west edge of Ward 18 has been C P R C P R evolving and needs a new blueprint for the 21st century. This DUPONT ST DUPONT ST area reflects the general character and demographics of Ward C N R 18. It is diverse in its uses, building forms, range of housing and rich cultural communities. Increasingly new development DUNDAS ST W OSSINGTON AVE OSSINGTON BLOOR ST W AVE OSSINGTON BLOOR ST W BATHURST ST BATHURST BATHURST ST BATHURST CHRISTIE ST is beginning to fill in some of the vacant and underutilized lots. CHRISTIE ST RONCESVALLES AVE RONCESVALLES At the request of City Council, City Planning, in consultation C N R with other Divisions, has conducted an area-wide review COLLEGE ST of lands abutting the CN railway that forms the western DUNDAS ST W boundary of Ward 18. The Study: C N R / C P R • identifies potential locations for new parks and open
    [Show full text]
  • Growing with Infrastructure
    2 COMPLETING A COMMUNITY North York Development Proceeds SCARBOROUGH 4 JUNCTION TRIANGLE 3585 St. Clair Ave. East Proposal FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 2020 Vol. 24 No. 45 PROPOSED OPAS TO SHAPE THE FUTURE OF KEELE-FINCH GROWING WITH INFRASTRUCTURE Marc Mitanis wo Ocial Plan Armstrong told NRU. “It’s not meetings with students and stations and their immediate Amendments (OPAs) being about the transit infrastructure business owners, and online surroundings as PMTSAs. T proposed by the city aim itself, but about how to grow engagement opportunities. A OPA 482 identies the Finch to provide a blueprint for future with that infrastructure.” preferred concept was endorsed West Transit Station Area—the development in the Keele-Finch A proposed secondary by North York community area around the Finch West neighbourhood, harnessing plan and two Protected council in 2018 and city subway station and the future anticipated population and Major Transit Station Areas sta began working on the Finch West LRT station—as employment growth and (PMTSAs) forecast where development of a secondary a PMTSA where growth is leveraging investment from the and how growth will occur. plan. targeted to accommodate at December 2017 opening of the Public consultations began Presented at a virtual public CONTINUED PAGE 9 Finch West subway station and in 2016 and took numerous information session held on the future opening of the under- forms, including open houses, November 9, the rst OPA Map showing the construction Finch West LRT. workshops, community denes two higher-order transit two nodes, several corridors, and distinct However, owners of employment neighbourhood lands in the Keele-Finch area districts identified in are expressing concerns that the proposed Keele proposed residential permissions Finch Secondary Plan, which includes policy contained in the OPAs are directions to guide incompatible with existing development in the industrial operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Space for Culture: Community Consultation Summaries
    Making Space for Culture Community Consultation Summaries April 2014 Cover Photos courtesy (clockwise from top left) Harbourfront Centre, TIFF Bell Lightbox, Artscape, City of Toronto Museum Services Back Cover: Manifesto Festival; Photo courtesy of Manifesto Documentation Team Making Space for Culture: Overview BACKGROUND Making Space for Culture is a long-term planning project led 1. Develop awareness among citizens, staff, City Councillors by the City of Toronto, Cultural Services on the subject of cultural and potential partners and funders of the needs of cultural infrastructure city-wide. Funded by the Province of Ontario, the and community arts organizations, either resident or providing study builds on the first recommendation made in Creative Capital programming in their ward, for suitable, accessible facilities, Gains: An Action Plan for Toronto, a report endorsed by City equipment and other capital needs. Council in May 2011. The report recommends “that the City ensure 2. Assist with decision-making regarding infrastructure a supply of affordable, sustainable cultural space” for use by cultural investment in cultural assets. industries, not-for-profit organizations and community groups in the City of Toronto. While there has been considerable public and private 3. Disseminate knowledge regarding Section 37 as it relates investment in major cultural facilities within the city in the past to cultural facilities to City Councillors, City staff, cultural decade, the provision of accessible, sustainable space for small and organizations, and other interested parties. mid-size organizations is a key factor in ensuring a vibrant cultural 4. Develop greater shared knowledge and strengthen community. collaboration and partnerships across City divisions and agencies with real estate portfolios, as a by-product of the The overall objective of the Making Space for Culture project is to consultation process.
    [Show full text]
  • 923466Magazine1final
    www.globalvillagefestival.ca Global Village Festival 2015 Publisher: Silk Road Publishing Founder: Steve Moghadam General Manager: Elly Achack Production Manager: Bahareh Nouri Team: Mike Mahmoudian, Sheri Chahidi, Parviz Achak, Eva Okati, Alexander Fairlie Jennifer Berry, Tony Berry Phone: 416-500-0007 Email: offi[email protected] Web: www.GlobalVillageFestival.ca Front Cover Photo Credit: © Kone | Dreamstime.com - Toronto Skyline At Night Photo Contents 08 Greater Toronto Area 49 Recreation in Toronto 78 Toronto sports 11 History of Toronto 51 Transportation in Toronto 88 List of sports teams in Toronto 16 Municipal government of Toronto 56 Public transportation in Toronto 90 List of museums in Toronto 19 Geography of Toronto 58 Economy of Toronto 92 Hotels in Toronto 22 History of neighbourhoods in Toronto 61 Toronto Purchase 94 List of neighbourhoods in Toronto 26 Demographics of Toronto 62 Public services in Toronto 97 List of Toronto parks 31 Architecture of Toronto 63 Lake Ontario 99 List of shopping malls in Toronto 36 Culture in Toronto 67 York, Upper Canada 42 Tourism in Toronto 71 Sister cities of Toronto 45 Education in Toronto 73 Annual events in Toronto 48 Health in Toronto 74 Media in Toronto 3 www.globalvillagefestival.ca The Hon. Yonah Martin SENATE SÉNAT L’hon Yonah Martin CANADA August 2015 The Senate of Canada Le Sénat du Canada Ottawa, Ontario Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A4 K1A 0A4 August 8, 2015 Greetings from the Honourable Yonah Martin Greetings from Senator Victor Oh On behalf of the Senate of Canada, sincere greetings to all of the organizers and participants of the I am pleased to extend my warmest greetings to everyone attending the 2015 North York 2015 North York Festival.
    [Show full text]
  • The Most 'Attractive .Resort
    '" : .. The Most 'Attractive .Resort & 'in Town: " .. ,.1; . Public Library Service 'in West Toronto Junction~ . 1888-1989 . Barbara ~orsyth and Barbara Myrvold TorontOPublic TJi Library The Most Attractive Resort in Town: -""'" - - ..-c> ] II 1101 I ~ 101 11 ] , I h. 1:" ;ID: \\ \\ \\ If III; ~ '~7-n. ~ . \ \ \ \1 If r11 ~ [l~IIJ U OJ )Jl~IIJ ! ~-=-L g~ "= ! =-- '-- '-- Mt 1M I!!I! ffI I fElt: Pl~ 'Fl:~ gg if~Fl ~E1fEl~ -l -I Public Library Service in West Toronto Junction ~ 1888-1989 Barbara Forsyth and Barbara Myrvold • .J ~W~O •• Ubrary 1989 Copyright © 1989 Toronto Public Library Board ISBN 0-920601-10-3 Typesetting, design and layout: Peter B. Merey/ Pro Familia Publishing Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Forsyth, Barbara, 1951· The most attractive resort in town: public library service in West Toronto Junction, 1888·1989 Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-920601-10-3 1. Toronto Public Library. Annette Street Branch­ History. 2. Public libraries - Ontario - Toronto - History. 3. West Toronto (Toronto, Ont.) - History. I. Myrvold, Barbara. II. Toronto Public Library Board. III. Title. Z736.A55F61989 027.4713'541 C89-095176-4 Guide to Abbreviations AO Archives of Ontario CTA City of Toronto Archives MTLB Metropolitan Toronto Library Board TBE Records, Archives and Museum, Toronto Board of Education TPLA Toronto Public Library Archives TPLAS Toronto Public Library, Annette Street Library Printed and bound in Canada TPLD/S Toronto Public Library, DufferinjSt. Clair Library WTJHS West Toronto Junction Historical Society Table of Contents Preface .................................. 5 Introduction............................... 7 West Toronto Junction Mechanics' Institute, 1888-95 ................................ 7 Toronto Junction Public Library, 1895-1904: Financial Crisis and Recovery .................
    [Show full text]
  • The Toronto Community Improvement Plan for Brownfield Remediation and Development of Prescribed Employment Uses
    The Toronto Community Improvement Plan for Brownfield Remediation and Development of Prescribed Employment Uses TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 PROJECT AREA & SUMMARY ................................................................................... 3 1.1 Project Area .................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Summary......................................................................................................... 3 2 AUTHORITY ............................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Authority for CIP and Grants.......................................................................... 3 2.2 Authority for Brownfield Assistance.............................................................. 4 3 BASIS ....................................................................................................................... 5 3.1 Background..................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Economic Development Focussed on Sectors................................................ 5 3.3 Challenges Facing the Development of Employment Uses in Toronto.......... 6 4 OBJECTIVES OF THE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN ......................................... 8 5 MUNICIPAL TAX INCREMENT ................................................................................... 9 6 THE CIP PROGRAM ................................................................................................ 10
    [Show full text]
  • Sterling Road Essentials
    THE NEW T3 Sterling Road is 420,000 square feet of heavy timber office across STERLING three buildings. Rich in industrial soul and stacked with amenities, T3 is in a connected Toronto neighbourhood that’s buzzing with creative energy. A TRANSIT-CONNECTED SOLID, SUSTAINABLE TIMBER CULTURAL HOTSPOT These striking timber and steel buildings STANDARD This location is one of the best in the city for ooze industrial soul, and embody a modern, transit – and a rising destination for Toronto renewable future for office design. culture, life, and work. A MAGNET FOR TOP TALENT LOWER COSTS PER This connected office hub will help top EMPLOYEE companies attract and retain the finest minds in the city. And WELL, LEED and Smarter floorplans, higher specs, soaring Wired Score standards will keep them ceilings, and natural light keep employees MODERN happy and healthy here for years. happy. Shared amenities keep them here HEAVY TIMBER CREATIVE longer. Costs are lower. Everyone wins. OFFICE COMES TO THE JUNCTION TRIANGLE THE POWER OF T3 T3 Sterling Road combines timber, transit, and technology to create the kind of inspired workplace today’s talent loves. TIMBER Heavy timber design delivers warm interiors, industrial character, and next-generation sustainability – all aligned closely to today’s innovative work culture. TRANSIT T3 Sterling Road boasts an unbeatable Transit Score of 100, with a location that’s in walking distance to two key TTC Bloor subway line stops, three streetcar routes, a GO Train stop, the UP Express, and the West Toronto Railpath. TECHNOLOGY T3 Sterling Road is fully future-proofed, with WiredScore Platinum Certification, 5G capacity, advanced building systems, highly efficient workspace design, and amenities tailored for the modern creative workforce.
    [Show full text]
  • Communication from Albert Koehl
    May 21, 2019 [updated with signatories to November 30, 2019] ​ ​ Mayor John Tory and City Councillors City Hall, 2nd Floor 100 Queen St. W. Toronto, ON M5H 2N2 Dear Mayor Tory and City Councillors, Re: It’s (finally) time to make Bloor St. safe for Toronto Toronto has fallen behind other major cities in making its roads safe for residents and visitors who ride bicycles, or who would ride if they felt safe. Forty years after the installation of the ​ ​ city’s first bike lane, Toronto still lacks a coherent network of bike lanes. It’s time for City Hall to remedy this shortcoming, and to catch up with other major North American cities. A good place ​ to start is the extension of the Bloor bike lane westward from Shaw St. to High Park. Bike lanes on Bloor have been comprehensively studied many times, including in 1978, 1992, 2008, and 2017. Each of these studies confirmed the popularity of Bloor as a cycling route and the potential for significant growth in ridership. Each study likewise highlighted the value of Bloor as a key connecting route for a cycling network. The 2017 study of the Bloor bike lane pilot from Avenue Rd. to Shaw was, according to the city’s transportation manager, one of the most comprehensively studied road projects in recent North American history. ​ The failure to move forward on bike lanes on Bloor, despite the obvious need, is part of a larger failure to implement Toronto’s 2016 Bike Plan. A mere 27 km of bike lanes have been installed in the last three years — leaving the city far off track from the 335 km of lanes and roadside paths envisioned over the plan’s ten-year timeframe.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Clair Avenue West Area Transportation Master Plan Public Consultation Report
    St. Clair Avenue West Area Transportation Master Plan Public Consultation Report January 2016 Prepared by Robyn Shyllit Sr. Public Consultation Coordinator Public Consultation Unit Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Notification ................................................................................................................................. 2 3. Stakeholder Consultation ............................................................................................................ 3 3.1 Public Information Centre 1.............................................................................................. 3 3.2 Consultation with Property Owners .................................................................................. 3 3.3 Consultation with Turnberry Residents Association ........................................................ 4 3.4 Aboriginal Community Consultation ............................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.5 Agency Consultation ......................................................................................................... 3 3.6 Workshop with Students at Parkdale Collegiate Institute ................................................. 5 4. Summary of Consultation Input .................................................................................................. 6 4.1 Input from the Public .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Junction Triangle Area (Non- Delegated Items)
    STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Traffic Management Plan – Junction Triangle Area (Non- delegated Items) Date: November 5, 2013 To: Toronto and East York Community Council From: Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District Wards: Davenport, Ward 18 Reference Ts2013209te.top.doc Number: SUMMARY Transportation Services is requesting City Council receive this report for informational purposes only. Transportation Services is responding to a request from Councillor Ana Bailão to report on a number of requests in the Junction Triangle Area. The area is bounded by Bloor Street West to the south, Lansdowne Avenue to the east, and the CN tracks to the north and west. The residents have numerous traffic concerns, including vehicle speeds and volumes, parking activity, turn prohibitions and signal timings. The proposals in the Junction Triangle Area that are delegated items will be addressed in a separate report to Toronto and East York Community Council entitled "Traffic Management Plan - Junction Triangle Area (Delegated Items)". RECOMMENDATIONS Transportation Services recommends that: 1. City Council not approve the installation of a pedestrian crossover at the intersection of Symington Avenue and Paton Street/Ernest Avenue. 2. City Council not approve a left-turn prohibition for eastbound Bloor Street West at Perth Avenue operating from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., daily. Traffic Management Plan – Junction Triangle Area (Non-Delegated Items) 1 3. City Council not approve a left turn prohibition for westbound Dupont Street at Campbell Avenue operating Monday to Friday, 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m., Monday to Friday. Financial Impact The adoption of staff recommendations will not result in any financial impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Gentrification in Old-Industrial and Post-Industrial Cities
    Contemporary gentrification in old‐industrial and post‐industrial cities Brian Doucet [Note: this is a draft paper. Please do not cite without consulting with the author] Abstract The main aim of this paper is to better understand the differences between gentrification in post‐industrial cities – those that have thrived in the knowledge, finance and creative era – and old‐industrial cities – those that have struggled to make the transition away from manufacturing and industrial activities. Much of the theoretical and conceptual literature on gentrification comes from the former, while this is not surprising as gentrification originated in cities such as London, New York and Toronto, more conceptual and theoretical attention is needed on the differences in spatial form, built environment and conflicts which can exist in different types of cities. This paper will describe and analyse the similarities and differences between various forms of contemporary gentrification in old‐industrial and post‐ industrial cities. It will build conceptual spatial models of gentrification in these types of cities. This exploratory paper should be seen as a starting point towards more comparative research along this path and it will conclude by highlighting several gaps in the academic literature which have been uncovered by this study. Key words: gentrification, housing, gentrification wedge, old‐industrial cities, post‐industrial cities Dr. Brian Doucet Utrecht University, Faculty of Geosciences Department of Human Geography and Planning PO BOX 80.115 3508 TC, Utrecht The Netherlands +31 30 253 2966 [email protected] www.briandoucet.com 1 INTRODUCTION When I teach my first year geography students about what geography is and what geographers do, one of the first exercises I give them is to observe the landscape around them and question why things are where they are.
    [Show full text]