A Record-Setting Year for ARI's Free Books to Teachers Program Ayn Rand Featured in Playboy Magazine
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Ayn Rand? Ayn Rand Ayn
Who Is Ayn Rand? Ayn Rand Few 20th century intellectuals have been as influential—and controversial— as the novelist and philosopher Ayn Rand. Her thinking still has a profound impact, particularly on those who come to it through her novels, Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead—with their core messages of individualism, self-worth, and the right to live without the impositions of others. Although ignored or scorned by some academics, traditionalists, pro- gressives, and public intellectuals, her thought remains a major influence on Ayn Rand many of the world’s leading legislators, policy advisers, economists, entre- preneurs, and investors. INTRODUCTION AN Why does Rand’s work remain so influential? Ayn Rand: An Introduction illuminates Rand’s importance, detailing her understanding of reality and human nature, and explores the ongoing fascination with and debates about her conclusions on knowledge, morality, politics, economics, government, AN INTRODUCTION public issues, aesthetics and literature. The book also places these in the context of her life and times, showing how revolutionary they were, and how they have influenced and continue to impact public policy debates. EAMONN BUTLER is director of the Adam Smith Institute, a leading think tank in the UK. He holds degrees in economics and psychology, a PhD in philosophy, and an honorary DLitt. A former winner of the Freedom Medal of Freedom’s Foundation at Valley Forge and the UK National Free Enterprise Award, Eamonn is currently secretary of the Mont Pelerin Society. Butler is the author of many books, including introductions on the pioneering economists Eamonn Butler Adam Smith, Milton Friedman, F. -
Reckless Caution: the Perils of Judicial Minimalism
RECKLESS CAUTION: THE PERILS OF JUDICIAL MINIMALISM Tara Smith* ABSTRACT Judicial Minimalism is the increasingly popular view that judges decide cases properly to the extent that they minimize their own imprint on the law by meticulously assessing “one case at a time,” ruling on narrow and shallow grounds, eschewing broader theories, and altering entrenched legal practices only incremen- tally. Minimalism’s ascendancy across the political spectrum, be- ing embraced by advocates of both right-wing and left-wing ide- ologies, is touted as a sign of its appropriate value-neutrality. This paper argues that such sought-after neutrality is, in fact, untenable. While others have objected to some of Minimalism’s specific tenets, critics have missed its more fundamental failing: it is an incoherent concept. On analysis, Minimalism’s several planks and rationales prove mutually contradictory and, corre- spondingly, offer conflicting guidance to judges. Thus the reason that Minimalism can appeal to people of such disparate substan- tive views is that in practice, it is merely a placeholder invoked to * Many people have offered helpful discussion of the ideas developed in this paper or feedback on earlier drafts. I am grateful to audiences at Oxford’s Uehiro Center and the University of Virginia, and in particular to Tom Bowden, Onkar Ghate, Wesley Hottot, Loren Lomasky, Al Martinich, Matt Miller, Adam Mossoff, Matt O’Brien, Greg Salmieri, Julian Savulescu, John Simmons, and Kevin Stuart. 347 348 New York University Journal of Law & Liberty [Vol. 5:347 sanction a grab-bag of desiderata rather than a distinctive method of decision-making that offers genuine guidance. -
A Strategy for Dismantling Structural Racism in the Juvenile Delinquency System
Poverty & Race PRRAC POVERTY & RACE RESEARCH ACTION COUNCIL March/April 2011 Volume 20: Number 2 A Strategy for Dismantling Structural Racism in the Juvenile Delinquency System by Edgar S. Cahn, Keri A. Nash & Cynthia Robbins Juveniles of color are more likely outcomes for youth of color have been to 2004, African Americans com- than their white counterparts to be ar- well documented for years. This ar- prised only 16% of all youth in the rested, referred to juvenile court rather ticle provides some of the national data United States, but constituted 28% of than diversion programs, waived to that underscore the extensive racial juvenile arrests; 30% of referrals to adult court, detained pre-trial and disparity that persists in the juvenile juvenile court; 37% of the detained locked up at disposition. justice system. Second, the article will population; 34% of youth formally In 2008, the Racial Justice Initia- narrow the focus to Washington, DC, processed by the juvenile court; 30% tive of TimeBanks USA (“RJI”)— where the RJI is working more inten- of adjudicated youth; 35% of youth www.RacialJusticeInitiative.org— sively in 2011 and beyond. Finally, judicially waived to adult criminal developed a new social advocacy and the article sets forth how this strategy court; 38% of youth in residential litigation strategy focused on disman- could be implemented to break placement; and 58% of youth admit- tling structural racism in the juvenile through more than three decades of ted to state adult prison. There is in- justice and child welfare systems as logjam on legal challenges to racial controvertible evidence that race bias well as other public systems that af- disparity in juvenile justice. -
How Ayn Rand's Ideas Can End Big Government Yaron Brook, Don
Free Market Revolution: How Ayn Rand'S Ideas Can End Big Government Yaron Brook, Don Watkins - book free by Yaron Brook, Don Watkins Free Market Revolution: How Ayn Rand's Ideas Can End Big Government, Read Free Market Revolution: How Ayn Rand's Ideas Can End Big Government Books Online Free, Free Market Revolution: How Ayn Rand's Ideas Can End Big Government Yaron Brook, Don Watkins pdf, Yaron Brook, Don Watkins epub Free Market Revolution: How Ayn Rand's Ideas Can End Big Government, read online free Free Market Revolution: How Ayn Rand's Ideas Can End Big Government, Free Market Revolution: How Ayn Rand's Ideas Can End Big Government Full Download, read online free Free Market Revolution: How Ayn Rand's Ideas Can End Big Government, Free Market Revolution: How Ayn Rand's Ideas Can End Big Government Full Collection, Read Best Book Free Market Revolution: How Ayn Rand's Ideas Can End Big Government Online, Free Market Revolution: How Ayn Rand's Ideas Can End Big Government pdf read online, Free Market Revolution: How Ayn Rand's Ideas Can End Big Government Full Download, pdf Yaron Brook, Don Watkins Free Market Revolution: How Ayn Rand's Ideas Can End Big Government, Read Online Free Market Revolution: How Ayn Rand's Ideas Can End Big Government E-Books, Read Free Market Revolution: How Ayn Rand's Ideas Can End Big Government Full Collection Yaron Brook, Don Watkins, Free Market Revolution: How Ayn Rand's Ideas Can End Big Government Download PDF, Download Free Market Revolution: How Ayn Rand's Ideas Can End Big Government PDF, Free -
The Moral CASE for Capitalism
the May 2007 / Volume 3, Issue 4 / the-undercurrent.com Undercurrent “It was as if an underground stream flowed through the country and broke out in sudden springs that shot to the surface at random, in unpredictable places.” Ayn Rand INSIDE THE MORAL case THIS ISSUE Freedom of Speech: foR caPitaLism An Interview with Dr. Achieving the good requires protecting freedom, Onkar Ghate not enforcing sacrifice. page 3 by Noah Stahl In Defense of Income It is widely acknowledged that capitalist countries are the most successful at Inequality creating wealth and raising their citizens’ overall standard of living. People page 7 who live in such countries enjoy access to bigger homes, better-trained doctors, more advanced technology, and higher paying jobs. By contrast, those living under collectivist systems like the European welfare states often Atlas Shrugged Essay endure long waits for poorer quality medical help and have far less choice in the things they buy and less money to buy them with. Studies like the Index of Economic Contest Freedom consistently find that higher measures of economic liberty correlate strongly with better page 7 standards of living: the freer people are, the richer they become. But in spite of all this, capitalism is criticized. Its detractors complain that it creates an unjust divide between rich and poor—or that employers don’t pay employees their rightful due—or that Speakers, Events, and the poor are “denied access” to basic needs like education, medical care, and retirement income. Meetings Even though the poor in capitalist countries enjoy far greater resources and opportunities than their counterparts in collectivist nations, critics denounce capitalism for allowing some people to page 8 (Continued on Page 2) OBJECTIVISM The Undercurrent’s cultural commentary Campus Commentary On Free Speech is based on Ayn Rand’s philosophy, University Mission Statements: False Objectivism. -
THE MYTH ABOUT AYN RAND and SOCIAL SECURITY by Onkar Ghate | June 19, 2014
GOVERNMENT & BUSINESS INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS SHARE THE MYTH ABOUT AYN RAND AND SOCIAL SECURITY by Onkar Ghate | June 19, 2014 You know your critics are desperate when they accuse you of hypocrisy without bothering to investigate your stated principles. The desperation is especially palpable if you’ve explained how those principles apply to the very action you’re being criticized for. So it is with Ayn Rand and Social Security. When fans voice her moral critique of the welfare state, many opponents respond by attacking her. She collected Social Security, they say, even though she opposed the program’s very existence. What a hypocrite! But what a gift, because she’s shown that her philosophy is unlivable. Case closed. If only real thinking were this easy. From the archival evidence I’ve seen, Rand did collect Social Security. But isn’t it relevant that Rand argued in printfor the consistency of this position, a fact any informed critic should know? We might end up disagreeing with Rand’s analysis, but doesn’t plain decency require that we first examine it? So let’s do that. Rand morally opposes the welfare state because she’s an unwavering advocate of the individual’s moral right to his life, his liberty, his earned property, and the pursuit of his own happiness. She viewed America as putting an end to the idea that the individual must live for king, neighbor or pope. For the first time in history the individual was declared free to live for himself. It was not handouts or entitlement programs that the millions of individuals who came to America’s shores sought, but freedom. -
The Contested Legacy of Ayn Rand
THE CONTESTED LEGACY OF AYN RAND Truth and Toleration in Objectivism THE CONTESTED LEGACY OF AYN RAND THE CONTESTED LEGACY OF AYN RAND Truth and Toleration in Objectivism DAVID KELLEY The OBJECTIVIST CENTER Transaction Publishers Poughkeepsie, New York New Brunswick (U.S.) & London (U.K.) First Printing, February, 1990 Second Revised Edition, 2000 Copyright © 1990 by David Kelley Copyright © 2000 by David Kelley All Rights Reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted in any form without written permission from the author. For information address Dr. David Kelley, The Objectivist Center, 11 Raymond Avenue, Suite 31, Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Kelley, David, 1949– The Contested Legacy of Ayn Rand: Truth and Toleration in Objectivism/ David Kelley Includes bibliographic references (p. 103–111) and index. ISBN 1-57724-010-3 Printed in the United States of America The Objectivist Center 11 Raymond Avenue, Suite 31 Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE TO THE 2ND EDITION 9 INTRODUCTION 13 I. MORAL JUDGMENT 19 COGNITION AND EVALUATION 19 MORAL JUDGMENT 21 TYPES OF MORAL JUDGMENT 23 THE TEMPERAMENT OF A JUDGE 28 II. SANCTION 31 EXISTENTIAL AID AND MORAL SANCTION 31 THE CASE OF LIBERTARIANISM 36 III. ERROR AND EVIL 39 IDEAS AND ORIGINAL SIN 40 THE ROLE OF IDEAS IN HISTORY 43 THE SCOPE OF HONEST ERROR 50 INHERENTLY DISHONEST IDEAS 57 IV. TOLERATION 61 TOLERANCE, JUSTICE, AND BENEVOLENCE 61 TOLERANCE AND OBJECTIVITY 63 V. OBJECTIVISM 71 OPEN AND CLOSED SYSTEMS 73 OBJECTIVISM AS AN OPEN SYSTEM 75 WHAT IS OBJECTIVISM? 81 THE OBJECTIVIST MOVEMENT 85 POSTSCRIPT 95 NOTES 103 APPENDIX A: A QUESTION OF SANCTION 113 APPENDIX B: BETTER THINGS TO DO 119 INDEX 123 PREFACE TO THE 2ND EDITION 2000 Ayn Rand’s philosophical novels The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged made her the most controversial author of her age. -
Equal Is Unfair: Americas Misguided Fight Against Income Inequality Free
FREE EQUAL IS UNFAIR: AMERICAS MISGUIDED FIGHT AGAINST INCOME INEQUALITY PDF Don Watkins,Yaron Brook | 258 pages | 17 Oct 2016 | St Martin's Press | 9781250084446 | English | New York, United States iSách – Equal Is Unfair: America′s Misguided Fight Against Income Inequality EPUB/PDF/PRC miễn phí The real problem is not free markets but arbitrary government power. An impressive achievement. Available March 29 from St. Martin's Press, Equal Equal is Unfair: Americas Misguided Fight Against Income Inequality Unfair systematically dismantles every major claim made by the inequality alarmists, while unmasking the truth that their campaign to fight inequality is really a thinly veiled crusade designed to expand the power of government. Equal Is Unfair shows that this unprecedented power grab can only be accomplished by shackling the innovators and entrepreneurs who drive Equal is Unfair: Americas Misguided Fight Against Income Inequality progress, and throttling the ambitious poor who inequality alarmists purport to want to help most. Not only does this ideology produce economic devastation, but as Watkins and Brook argue, it is unfairunjust, and immoral. As Equal is Unfair: Americas Misguided Fight Against Income Inequality and Brook write, "Our future will be determined by whether we recommit ourselves to the ideal of opportunity -- or whether we abandon that ideal in the name of waging war on economic inequality. A fellow at the Ayn Rand Institute and a former Forbes. He is the host of the podcast The Debt Dialogues. For more information on Objectivism's unique point of view, go to ARI's website. Tesla reported third-quarter earnings results after market close on Wednesday. -
Yaron Brook Speaks to a Wide Array of Audiences, Continued from Page 1
aynrand.org/impact Volume 19, Number 5, May 2013 Yaron Brook Speaks Objectivist Summer Conference Is Almost Here . to a Wide Array Register Today! of Audiences history to psychology, music and current events. In addition, there is plenty of time to his spring ARI executive socialize with others who share some of director Yaron Brook T your deepest values. It is common to see traveled all over the world. people enjoying conversations with other He participated in debates, attendees late into the night. Those in lectured on college campuses, attendance vary widely in age, occupation sat on panels and much more, and the number of years they have been discussing topics ranging familiar with Ayn Rand’s ideas. Some have from capitalism and economic only recently discovered Rand, while others history to law and taxes. have attended the Objectivist summer Throughout his travels, t’s not too late to register for the annual Objec- conference for more than two decades. Some are Dr. Brook advocated Ayn Rand’s ideas and their tivist summer conference, which takes place this students still deciding which career to pursue while application to current issues to thousands of peo- I year July 5–11 in Chicago at the Westin Michigan others are well established in business, academia ple, ranging from college students and academic Avenue Hotel. and other fields. Many attendees have communi- scholars to policy activists and congressional staff- The conference offers a unique opportunity cated to ARI in past years that they have met their ers. Below is a sampling of Dr. Brook’s speaking to meet other fans of Ayn Rand. -
John Dewey, Maria Montessori, and Objectivist Educational Philosophy During the Postwar Years
73 Historical Studies in Education / Revue d’histoire de l’éducation ARTICLES / ARTICLES “The Ayn Rand School for Tots”: John Dewey, Maria Montessori, and Objectivist Educational Philosophy during the Postwar Years Jason Reid ABSTRACT Objectivism, the libertarian philosophy established by Ayn Rand during the postwar years, has attracted a great deal of attention from philosophers, political scientists, economists, and English professors alike in recent years, but has not received much notice from historians with an interest in education. This article will address that problem by discussing how Rand and her followers established a philosophy of education during the 1960s and 1970s that was based, in part, on vilifying the so-called collectivist ideas of John Dewey and lionizing the so-called individualist ideas of Maria Montessori. Unfortunately, the narrative that emerged during this time seriously misrepresented the ideas of both Dewey and Montessori, resulting in a some- what distorted view of both educators. RÉSUMÉ L’objectivisme, philosophie libertaire conçue par Ayn Rand dans la période de l’après-guerre, a suscitée beaucoup d’attention de la part des philosophes, politologues, économistes et profes- seurs de littérature anglaise, mais rien de tel chez les historiens de l’éducation. Cet article cor- rige cette lacune, en montrant comment durant les années 1960 et 1970 Rand et ses partisans ont établi une philosophie de l’éducation qui s’appuyait, en partie, sur la diffamation des idées prétendues collectivistes de John Dewey et l’idolâtrie de l’individualisme de Maria Montessori. Malheureusement, leurs travaux ont donné une fausse image des idées de Dewey et Montessori et conséquemment ont déformé les théories ces deux éducateurs. -
More Than $370,000 Raised at Chicago Fundraising Dinner, Continued from Page 1
aynrand.org/impact Volume 18, Number 6, June 2012 Yaron Brook Speaks to a More Than $370,000 Raised at Chicago Wide Array of Audiences Fundraising Dinner RI executive director A Yaron Brook has traveled n May 3 ARI held its first fundraising dinner in frequently this spring all O Chicago, titled Atlas Shrugged Revolution, at Auctioned items at the Chicago over the world. He partici- the Waldorf Astoria Chicago. The event raised more fundraising dinner included: pated in debates, lectured on than $370,000 for ARI and was attended by more college campuses, sat on than a hundred people. • A first edition copy of The Fountainhead panels and much more, dis- “We are overwhelmed by the response we • A limited-edition tenth anniversary copy of cussing topics ranging from received in Chicago,” commented Yaron Brook, Atlas Shrugged capitalism and economic his- ARI’s executive director. “For the first dinner • An original clipping from the New York tory to war and taxes. we’ve held in the Chicago area, the amount raised Times of the paperback best-seller list from Throughout his travels, Dr. Brook commu- and the enthusiasm of everyone in attendance was April 7, 1963, showing Atlas Shrugged in nicated Ayn Rand’s ideas and their application more than expected and deeply appreciated.” ninth place, annotated by Ayn Rand to current issues to thousands of people, ranging The evening’s speakers included businessmen, • A set of four difficult-to-find foreign from college students and academic scholars members of the media, educators and students. editions of Atlas Shrugged to business leaders and congressional staffers. -
A Reply to Tibor Machan
LIBERTARIAN PAPERS VOL. 2, ART. NO. 9 (2010) WHEN IS A MONOPOLY NOT A MONOPOLY? A REPLY TO TIBOR MACHAN * NICHOLAS DYKES IN A LENGTHY FOOTNOTE to his essay “Reconciling Anarchism and Minarchism”1 (henceforth RAM) Tibor Machan accuses me of engaging in equivocation, and also of psychologising, in my essay “The Facts of Reality: Logic and History in Objectivist Debates about Government”2 (henceforth TFOR). Machan writes: … Dykes doesn’t seem to realise that monopoly in the use of retaliatory force is not the same as a legal or coercive monopoly in that use. He persists in this equivocation. Yet, one can have a monopoly that comes about naturally, because it is freely granted to one by people—as, say, they effectively granted the Beatles monopoly status in rock music or Fred Astaire in dancing or IBM in computers and Microsoft in software … without keeping anyone out by force. Furthermore, if people freely select a group of specialists to protect them by way of a long-term binding contract [or compact] that’s not to establish an objectionable, coercive monopoly, merely an exclusive but binding relationship …. It is along such lines that Rand’s notion of the “monopoly” of retaliatory force needs to be understood (RAM 61). Machan adds further on that equivocation is a “serious flaw” in my essay. To begin with, let’s be clear about what the term ‘equivocation’ means. I hardly need to point out that it is a fallacy in logic, one which involves *Nicholas Dykes ([email protected]), a British-Canadian writer currently living in England, is author of Old Nick’s Guide to Happiness: A Philosophical Novel (Ledbury, UK: Lathé Biosas Publishing, 2008).