An Empty Graveyard: the Victims of the 1946 AOA DC-4 Crash, Their Final Resting Place, and Dark Tourism Lisa M. DALY Independent

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Empty Graveyard: the Victims of the 1946 AOA DC-4 Crash, Their Final Resting Place, and Dark Tourism Lisa M. DALY Independent AP: Online Journal in Public Archaeology Special Volume 3 - 2018 p. 79-98 An Empty Graveyard: The Victims of the 1946 AOA DC-4 Crash, Their Final Resting Place, and Dark Tourism Lisa M. DALY Independent Researcher Received: 19/09/2017 — Accepted: 31/07/2018 Abstract In 2013, archaeologists succeeded in locating a plane crash that had been presumed buried based on local stories. The aircraft had crashed into a steep hill, subsequently known as Crash Hill. On the summit is a deteriorated memorial which resembles a cemetery, marking the thirty-nine people who died in the 1946 tragedy. This memorial has been a spot of pilgrimage for family and an attraction for adventure seekers. This draw to dark tourism sites is not uncommon but since archaeologists shared their finds with the public through social and local media, many of those visitors are drawn to the crash site instead of the memorial. This is a problem as there are possibly mass graves at the crash site, and visitation can potentially disturb those remains. This article argues for caution when discussing finds publically and for the repair and restoration of the memorial at the top of the hill to fill the want to visit a site of tragedy without disturbing the actual crash site. Keywords aviation archaeology, dark tourism, aviation history, Newfoundland and Labrador 80 - Lisa M. DALY - An Empty Graveyard Introduction On top of Crash Hill, in Stephenville, Newfoundland and Labrador, is a monument to the thirty-nine victims of the crash of American Overseas Airlines Douglas DC-4 NC-900904, and a small, fenced area containing thirty-nine crosses, now broken, weather-worn and fallen. For years, this monument – a cenotaph with the appearance of a burial ground – had been a trail-end for hikers, snowmobilers, and all-terrain vehicle users, as the graveyard associated with the 1946 airplane crash. In 2013, an archaeological team from Memorial University of Newfoundland, with a local guide, endeavoured to discover the actual site of the crash on the hill somewhere below the monument, to assess the claims that the site had been buried by blasting the top of the hill. Archaeologists also wanted to attempt to locate the mass grave or graves indicated by conflicting stories circulating in the local community about the recovery efforts. The site was located, but no graves were positively identified. Since then, the monument has shifted from being the end of the trail, to an indicator as to the location of the physical wreckage of the aircraft, and many who were once content to visit the summit of the hill have been attempting to access the crash itself. This new element of dark tourism is putting visitors, the integrity of the site, and the human remains buried somewhere at the crash site, at risk. This article reviews the history of the crash and its subsequent memorialization, before discussing the challenges of dark tourism and potential future treatment of the landscape as a site of memory. History of the Crash AOA NC-900904, hereafter AOA 904, was scheduled to fly from LaGuardia Field, New York, to Shannon, Ireland, with a refuelling stop in Gander, Newfoundland. The aircraft departed New York at 12.14 (Newfoundland Time, UTC 03.30) on 2 October 1946 and at 16.13, Captain William R. Westerfield was informed by the dispatcher at Gander, that the weather in Gander was unsuitable for landing and not expected to improve (Landis et al. 1947; Wilkins 1946). The aircraft was to proceed to Stephenville, where it landed at 16.30 (Landis et al. 1947). There had been an alternated crew waiting in Gander, but as no crew was in Stephenville, the crew Lisa M. DALY - An Empty Graveyard - 81 were required to have a twelve-hour stop over to rest (Wilkins 1946). Departure was scheduled for 04.45 on 3 October (Landis et al. 1947). Shortly before scheduled departure, the flight crew were briefed by the United States Army Air Force (USAAF) and informed about the expected weather for the duration of the flight (Landis et al. 1947). At 04.45, Captain Westerfield requested takeoff clearance, but was informed by the control tower operator that due to the fact that the winds had increased to 9 mph and were blowing 90 degrees to the runway there would be a change in runways (Landis et al. 1947; Wilkins 1946). Airfield procedure dictated that DC-4s were to take off over the water (Runway 30) if winds were less than 10 mph. Perhaps with the fear that winds might increase, the control tower operator advised that the flight be changed to Runway 7 (Wilkins 1946). The runway was cleared and AOA 904 took-off at 05.00 with a magnetic bearing of 70 degrees. Fifteen minutes later, the wind decreased to 4 mph (Landis et al. 1947). Otherwise, the ceiling was 5,000 feet and visibility was at 10 miles. This meant that the weather was clear for flying but the moon and stars were not visible (Landis et al. 1947; Wilkins 1946; Unknown Author 1946a). No one was watching the aircraft in the minutes after takeoff (McGrath 1946). One minute after takeoff, the control tower operator requested a ceiling check, and AOA 904 advised him to ‘wait for ceiling check’ (Landis et al. 1947; Wilkins 1946). No radio contact occurred after this. Two and a half minutes after takeoff, witnesses reported a glow of fire directly in line with the runway in the nearby hills (Landis et al. 1947). No other aircraft was flying in the area at the time, so it was assumed that AOA 904 had crashed (Wilkins 1946). Attempts were made to contact the aircraft, but to no avail. NC 90903 departed 22 minutes later, and was instructed to leave from runway 30 (Wilkins 1946). Search operations were initiated immediately by the USAAF, aircraft flying over the site described it as a ‘terrific fire’ with little hope of survivors (Figure 1). The aircraft had hit the hill seven miles from the runway, in an area where pilots familiar with the runway would make a right turn shortly after takeoff to avoid the hills. The hill is 1200 feet high and the aircraft struck forty feet from the summit (Wilkins 1946). It is 82 - Lisa M. DALY - An Empty Graveyard Figure 1: Aerial photo of the wreckage taken one hour after the crash by navigator Robert Alber of Air France (from the collection of Lisa M. Daly). Figure 2: Aerial view of the memorial at the top of Crash Hill taken in 1950 (from the collection of the Our Lady Of Mercy Church Museum, Port au Port Peninsula). Lisa M. DALY - An Empty Graveyard - 83 believed the pilot could not see the hills in the dark, and started the turn too soon or was unaware of the elevations in the area and struck the hill (Landis et al. 1947; Wilkins 1946). Helicopters used in the rescue of survivors from the Sabena OOCBG which crashed near Gander on 18 September 1946, only two weeks earlier, were requested, but deemed unnecessary and the request cancelled (Canadian Press 1946). Search parties were assembled, departed at dawn, travelled by rail to Harry’s River, across a marsh, then through four miles of forest. They arrived at the site around midday and the Newfoundland Rangers arrived shortly after at 14.00 (Canadian Press 1946; Horwood 1986: 118). They confirmed the deaths of all eight crew, twenty-five adult passengers, and the six children on board the aircraft. The search party also indicated that the remains were burned beyond recognition, and later searchers could only confirm the identities of a few people. Due to these factors, it was decided that the remains would not be removed from the site, but rather would be buried near the aircraft. One of the Newfoundlanders working at Harmon Airfield and a member of the initial search party, Ronald Reardon (2012), indicated that the remains were extensively damaged, with fragments scattered around the wreckage and in the trees. Due to the fire, transporting the remains was challenging, and he indicated that not all remains were likely collected and brought to the burial area. The remains were gathered, and according to Newfoundland Ranger T. Fitzpatrick, were ‘piled up like cordwood, all burned and blackened’ (Horwood 1986: 118), while they waited for a group of Americans to arrive with dynamite to blast a hole deep enough for the remains. The steep, rocky hillside has very shallow soil, so graves had to be blasted rather than dug by the Rangers. Although, the reports are a little conflicting from the Newfoundland Rangers on site, as Fitzpatrick claims there were multiple holes blasted and multiple graves, whereas labourer Reardon claimed a single grave was dug with a pick and shovel, and the official Ranger report says ‘during the day, they [twenty-five labourers] buried the remains of the victims and erected crosses and Stars of David’ (Figure 2; Fagan and Fitzpatrick 1946: 2; Horwood 1986: 119; Reardon 2012). Wilkins’ (1946) report does confirm the graves were blasted, but no further details are given. This is not a clear description of the burial. The remains were buried somewhere near the wreckage 84 - Lisa M. DALY - An Empty Graveyard in an unmarked area. To bury the wreckage and remains, steps were taken to obtain permission to dynamite the hill above the crash with the goal of burying the wreckage and remains under rubble (McGrath 1946). Within hours of the crash happening and the determination that there were no survivors, steps were taken to create a memorial.
Recommended publications
  • SEA8 Techrep Mar Arch.Pdf
    SEA8 Technical Report – Marine Archaeological Heritage ______________________________________________________________ Report prepared by: Maritime Archaeology Ltd Room W1/95 National Oceanography Centre Empress Dock Southampton SO14 3ZH © Maritime Archaeology Ltd In conjunction with: Dr Nic Flemming Sheets Heath, Benwell Road Brookwood, Surrey GU23 OEN This document was produced as part of the UK Department of Trade and Industry's offshore energy Strategic Environmental Assessment programme. The SEA programme is funded and managed by the DTI and coordinated on their behalf by Geotek Ltd and Hartley Anderson Ltd. © Crown Copyright, all rights reserved Document Authorisation Name Position Details Signature/ Initial Date J. Jansen van Project Officer Checked Final Copy J.J.V.R 16 April 07 Rensburg G. Momber Project Specialist Checked Final Copy GM 18 April 07 J. Satchell Project Manager Authorised final J.S 23 April 07 Copy Maritime Archaeology Ltd Project No 1770 2 Room W1/95, National Oceanography Centre, Empress Dock, Southampton. SO14 3ZH. www.maritimearchaeology.co.uk SEA8 Technical Report – Marine Archaeological Heritage ______________________________________________________________ Contents I LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................5 II ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................7 1. NON TECHNICAL SUMMARY................................................................................8 1.1
    [Show full text]
  • A PUBLICATION of the INTERNATIONAL GROUP for HISTORIC AIRCRAFT RECOVERY Spring 1988 Vol. 4 No. 1
    TIGHAR TRACKS A PUBLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL GROUP FOR HISTORIC AIRCRAFT RECOVERY Spring 1988 Vol. 4 No. 1 Contents SPRING 1988 Overview ..................................................................... 3 ... that they might escape the teeth of time Dear TIGHAR ............................................................ 4 and the hands of mistaken zeal. Project Midnight Ghost ............................................... 6 —JOHN AUBREY B-17E Recovery Expedition ....................................... 14 1660 Operation Sepulchre .................................................. 15 Members’ Exploits ..................................................... 16 TIGHAR (pronounced “tiger”) is the acronym for The Interna- Rumor Mill ............................................................... 17 tional Group for Historic Aircraft Recovery, a non-profit founda- tion dedicated to promoting responsible aviation archeology and Aviation Archeologist ................................................. 18 historic preservation. TIGHAR was incorporated in January 1985 Strictly Business ......................................................... 19 and recognized as a 501(c)(3) public charity by the IRS in Novem- ber of that year. Offices are maintained in Middletown, Delaware COVER: Preserved by the environment which imprisons on the Summit Airport, and staffed by the foundation’s Executive it, the world’s oldest complete and original B-17 Flying Committee, Richard E. Gillespie, Executive Director, and Patricia Fortress waits patiently in the
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Archaeology Technical Report
    Hornsea Project Three Offshore Wind Farm Hornsea Project Three Offshore Wind Farm Preliminary Environmental Information Report: Annex 9.1 – Marine Archaeology Technical Report Date: July 2017 Annex 9.1 – Marine Archaeology Technical Report Preliminary Environmental Information Report July 2017 Environmental Impact Assessment Preliminary Environmental Information Report Liability Volume 5 This report has been prepared by RPS, with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of their contracts with DONG Energy Power (UK) Ltd. Annex 9.1 – Marine Archaeology Technical Report Report Number: P6.5.9.1 Version: Final Date: July 2017 This report is also downloadable from the Hornsea Project Three offshore wind farm website at: www.dongenergy.co.uk/hornseaproject3 DONG Energy Power (UK) Ltd. 5 Howick Place, Prepared by: RPS London, SW1P 1WG Checked by: Julian Carolan and Kieran Bell © DONG Energy Power (UK) Ltd, 2017. All rights reserved Accepted by: Julian Carolan Front cover picture: Kite surfer near one of DONG Energy's UK offshore wind farms © DONG Energy Hornsea Approved by: Sophie Banham Project Three (UK) Ltd., 2016. i Annex 9.1 – Marine Archaeology Technical Report Preliminary Environmental Information Report July 2017 Table of Contents List of Figures 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Figure 2.1: Location of Hornsea Three (the marine archaeology study area), the former Hornsea Zone and
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 35, No. 2 December 2018
    DECEMBER 2018 SOMEWHERE IN THE USA 2018 Bomb Group Reunion History of Crew 49 Our 2018 Reunion By will be found to contain the true was held in Day- Robert M. Sanders facts and incidents of the crew ton, Ohio, Thurs- Bombardier from the time of its formation un- day, September 13, Mowery crew #49 til such time as it becomes dis- 2018 through Sun- 766th Squadron, solved. day, September 16, 461st Bombardment Group (H) 2018. Our reunion It all began in September 1943 home was the Submitted by when the individual members Crowne Plaza Ho- Julie Robinson were ordered to the Army Air tel, which provided Base at Mountain Home, Idaho. complimentary air- P R E F A C E At this base, the individual mem- port shuttle and ar- bers were assigned to the 470th ea destinations On the following pages, will be found the more or less “crew his- within five miles of (Continued on page 8) the hotel. tory” of crew number 49. This Some of our reun- ion committee Service and Sacrifice (Continued on page 4) by Budapest, Hungary during a Inside this issue: Julie Robinson bombing mission on April 13, History of Crew 49 1 1944. When I was young, I spent Part I- The Box of Letters hours searching for photos and Service & Sacrifice 1 sifting through old papers for in- My Uncle, 2nd Lieutenant George 2018 Reunion 1 formation about him. I ques- Lenon Owens, Jr. was a co-pilot tioned my parents and grandpar- Back to Torretta 24 in the Fifteenth Army Air Force, ents about his service and death, 461st Bomb Group, 766th Bomb Torretta Airfield 28 but they would quickly change Squadron during World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Conflict the Archaeology
    THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF CONFLICT Introduction by Richard Morris There can hardly be an English field that does still left with a question: why have the prosaic not contain some martial debris – an earthwork, traces of structures which were often stereotyped There is more to war than a splinter of shrapnel, a Tommy’s button. A and mass-produced become so interesting? weapons and fighting.The substantial part of our archaeological inheritance growth of interest in 20th- has to do with war or defence – hillforts, Roman Part of the answer, I think, is that there is more to century military remains is marching camps, castles, coastal forts, martello war than weapons and fighting. One reason for part of a wider span of social towers, fortified houses – and it is not just sites the growth of interest in 20th-century military evoking ancient conflict for which nations now remains is that it is not a stand-alone movement archaeology care.The 20th century’s two great wars, and the but part of the wider span of social archaeology. tense Cold War that followed, have become It encompasses the everyday lives of ordinary archaeological projects. Amid a spate of public- people and families, and hence themes which ation, heritage agencies seek military installations archaeology has hitherto not been accustomed to of all kinds for protection and display. approach, such as housing, bereavement, mourning, expectations.This wider span has Why do we study such remains? Indeed, should extended archaeology’s range from the nationally we study them? We should ask, for there are important and monumental to the routine and some who have qualms.
    [Show full text]
  • Aardvark Archaeology 2004 Archaeological Investigations at Ilhavo Park (Cjae-53) Duckworth Street and Plymouth Road, St
    Provincial Archaeology Office July 8, 2020 Aardvark Archaeology 2004 Archaeological Investigations at Ilhavo Park (CjAe-53) Duckworth Street and Plymouth Road, St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador. 03.51 2004 Stage 1 HRA of the St. John’s Harbour Clean-Up. Part 1: Water Street, from Hutchings Street to Waldegrave Street. 2005 HRIA for the East Coast Hiking Trail Interpretation on the Mount, Renews, Newfoundland. 05.18 2005 Stage 1 HRIA of the Mortier Bay-North Atlantic Marine Service Centre, Powers Cove, NL. 05.53 2005 HRIA of the Murphy’s Cove Development Project. Collier Point, Trinity Bay, Newfoundland and Labrador. 05.60 2005 HRIA of the South Brook Park Site (DgBj-03). 05.58 (on CD) 2006 Archaeological Monitoring of the 2006 Ferryland Beach Stabilization. 06.01 2006 Stage 1 HROA of 331 Water Street, St. John’s, NL. 2006 Archaeological Assessment of the Mockbeggar Plantation Provincial Historic Site Bonavista, Newfoundland and Labrador. 06.50 2006 Beneath the Big Store: Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment of the Mockbeggar Plantation Provincial Historic Site Bonavista, Newfoundland and Labrador. 06.50.01 2007 HRIA of Berry Island, Point Leamington Newfoundland and Labrador. 07.21 2008 Archaeological Assessment of the Bridge House Property (DdAg-03) Bonavista, Newfoundland and Labrador. 08.11 Adams, W. P. & J. B. Shaw 1967 Studies of Ice Cover on Knob Lake, New Québec. Cahiers de géographie du Québec, 11(22), p. 88-96. Adney, Edwin Tappan & Howard I. Chapelle 1964 The Bark Canoes and Skin Boats of North America. AECOM 2012 Stage 2 Historical Impact Assessment 2012 Strange Lake-Quest Rare Minerals Project Field Survey Results Update.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Aircraft Crash Sites
    2002 Military Aircraft Crash Sites Archaeological guidance on their significance and future management Military aircraft crash sites are an important part of Britain’s military and Belonging to a period still well within living memory, crash sites have significance for aviation heritage. Predominantly dating from World War II, during which there remembrance, commemoration, their was a massive expansion in air activity over the UK, they comprise the buried, cultural value as historic artefacts and the information they contain about both the submerged or surface remains of aircraft, most of which crashed either in circumstances of the loss and of the combat or training. aircraft itself. Crash sites may on occasion Some crash sites are visible, for example as spreads of wreckage within also contain human remains, giving them additional value and status as sacred sites upland environments, or are exposed at low tide. In most cases, however, a and war graves. scatter of surface debris may mask larger deposits, often buried at great depth. It is therefore important that these remains are considered a material matter The initial impetus for recoveries comes from both eyewitness reports and where they are affected by development documentary research.The debris field can be located by systematic walking proposals and local authority development across ploughed fields to identify surface concentrations of wreckage or with a plan policies and where research- or recovery-led excavations are proposed. magnetometer to assess the extent of buried remains, on the basis of which a Where crash sites are thought to be point or points of impact can be estimated.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Crash Sites at Sea: a Scoping Study
    Wessex Archaeology Aircraft Crash Sites at Sea A Scoping Study Archaeological Desk-based Assessment Ref: 66641.02 February 2008 AIRCRAFT CRASH SITES AT SEA: A SCOPING STUDY ARCHAEOLOGICAL DESK-BASED ASSESSMENT:FINAL REPORT Prepared by: Wessex Archaeology Portway House Old Sarum Park Salisbury WILTSHIRE SP4 6EB Prepared for: English Heritage February 2008 Ref: 66641.02 © Wessex Archaeology Limited 2008 Wessex Archaeology Limited is a Registered Charity No.28778 Aircraft Crash Sites at Sea: A Scoping Study Wessex Archaeology 66641.02 AIRCRAFT CRASH SITES AT SEA: A SCOPING STUDY ARCHAEOLOGICAL DESK-BASED ASSESSMENT:FINAL REPORT Ref: 66641.02 Summary Wessex Archaeology have been funded by English Heritage through the Aggregates Levy Sustainability Fund to undertake a scoping study to identify current gaps in data and understanding relating to aircraft crash sites at sea. The study arises partly out of the discovery of aircraft parts and associated human remains as a result of marine aggregate dredging. The objectives of the Scoping Study are as follows: x to review existing literature relating to the archaeology of aircraft crash sites at sea, existing guidance, and the legislative context; x to clarify the range and archaeological potential of aircraft crash sites, by presenting examples of aircraft crash sites, which will include a range of site conditions and mechanisms affecting site survival, their management and investigation; x to establish the relationship, in terms of numbers and composition, between the National Monuments Record
    [Show full text]
  • The Height of Heritage Digging Aviation Archaeology
    Summer 2007 The Official Magazine of California Wing Civil Air Patrol The Height of Heritage Digging Aviation Archaeology Tip of the Wing’s Sword “Saber” Training in NorCal Top Five Finds It’s ESsy Time Again Plus: • Taking Courage from Col. Fred Pitcher • Legally Deploying Cadets • Watching the Skies with Lt. Kevin Lowther EAGLE EYE Mission 05M--21552155––1212 NovNov 0505 –– NearNear TwentyTwenty--ninenine Palms,Palms, CACA 2 2nd Annual ESsy Awards FOR PRELIMINARY USE ONLY 12 Nov 05 84 RADES/OLAD ES Squadron of the Year 5 Eagle Call is an authorized publication serving the ES101 7 interests of the California Wing of the United States The Cutting Edge of Air Force Auxiliary Civil Air Patrol. A private firm that Ground Team Training is not connected with the Department of the Air Force or with the Civil Air Patrol Corporation publishes it. The appearance of advertisements in this publication, including supplements and inserts, does not constitute CAPTAIN’S LOG 16 an endorsement by the U.S. Air Force or CAP of the Redcap in Review products and services advertised herein. Eagle Call encourages contributions from all CAP members, military personnel, and related agencies. ATTITUDE 21 Material must be original, free of copyright constraint, Raise Funds, unpublished, and submitted only to Eagle Call, which reserves the right to approve, reject, edit, abridge or Not Eyebrows expand any submission. Features must be discussed in advance with the Editor, Capt. Greg Solman, at 909- 338-5789. COLUMN 27 Submission guidelines: As a thrice-yearly publication, Bird’s Eye View the magazine is not suitable for dated material on rou- tine Squadron or Wing activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Archaeology of World War Ii Gander
    AVIATION ARCHAEOLOGY OF WORLD WAR II GANDER: AN EXAMINATION OF MILITARY AND CIVILIAN LIFE AT THE NEWFOUNDLAND AIRPORT. by © Lisa M. Daly A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Arts Memorial University of Newfoundland April 2015 St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador ABSTRACT This project examines the Second World War (WWII) history of the Newfoundland Airport (Gander, Newfoundland), with a focus on civilian and military life on the base, and the potential for aviation archaeology to enhance the historical record. To accomplish this, ten WWII era airplane crash sites were examined archaeologically, using a variety of methods depending on the state of the wreck and the environment of the site. On the grounds of the original airbase, the Royal Canadian Air Force Globe Theatre was excavated to determine the viability of excavating areas of the former nearby town site and to examine the material culture of those living at the base. In particular, information was sought on potential interactions between the three main countries residing and working at Gander in WWII; Canada, the United States, and Newfoundland. The aircraft crash sites yielded information about the crashes themselves, modern reuse of sites, and the potential risk of disturbance. They also allowed for further development of archaeological methods to be used at other aviation sites around Newfoundland and Labrador. A major conclusion of this study is that base life was less segregated than official documents indicated, and that there was a significant amount of cooperation and flow of goods between the three countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Archaeology in Central Europe Natascha Mehler Editor Historical Archaeology in Central Europe (Full Color Edition)
    special publicatioN NuMber 10 Historical Archaeology in Central Europe Natascha Mehler Editor Historical Archaeology in Central Europe (Full Color Edition) Natascha Mehler Editor special publicatioN NuMber 10, the society for historical archaeology ©2013 Society for Historical Archaeology 9707 Key West Avenue, Suite 100 Rockville, MD 20850 SHA Journal Editor: J.W. Joseph ISBN:978-1-939531-02-5 Library of Congress Control Number: 2013936866 Published in the United States of America COVER IMAGE: by Thomas Pertlwieser, Department of Prehistory and Medieval Archaeology, University of Vienna. It is a composite of elements from the following images: Wooden gallows and breaking wheels in front of the town walls of Einbeck 1654, by Martin Zeiller (from Zeiller 1654); and Hoard of watches found with a metal de- tector at the Bad Jungbrunn site, Lavant (Photo by H. Stadler, 2008; courtesy of the Department of Archaeology, University of Innsbruck, Austria). BACK COVER IMAGE: The chimneys of Krupp Steel Works in Essen, Germany (courtesy of Stadtbildstelle Essen, ca. 1890. Exact date unknown). Dedicated to Paul Courtney Contents Foreword .................................................................................................................................................... vii I. Development, Current researCh, anD perspeCtIves Breaking New Ground: Historical Archaeology in Central Europe .........................................................11 ...................... 31 Archaeology of the Modern Period in the Czech Territories: A Long
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 17 Offshore Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
    East Anglia THREE Chapter 17 Offshore Archaeology and Cultural Heritage Environmental Statement Volume 1 Document Reference – 6.1.17 Author – Wessex Archaeology East Anglia THREE Limited Date – November 2015 Revision History – Revision A Environmental Statement East Anglia THREE Offshore Windfarm Chapter 17 Offshore Archaeology November 2015 This Page is Intentionally Blank Environmental Statement East Anglia THREE Offshore Windfarm Chapter 17 Offshore Archaeology November 2015 Table of Contents 17 Offshore Archaeology and Cultural Heritage ................................................. 1 17.1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 17.2 Consultation ................................................................................................. 4 17.3 Scope ......................................................................................................... 16 17.3.1 Scope of Assessment .......................................................................................... 16 17.3.2 Study Area........................................................................................................... 16 17.3.3 Embedded Mitigation ......................................................................................... 17 17.3.4 Worst Case .......................................................................................................... 28 17.4 Assessment Methodology ........................................................................... 34 17.4.1
    [Show full text]