WA-Website-Story.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WA-Website-Story.Pdf SPOTLIGHT Never forgotten The search for missing airmen Planes that crash in the sea during wartime are difficult to find, and the crewmen who go down with them are often surrendered to history. To help repatriate their remains, a collaboration of scientists and historical researchers has been searching for these wrecks with advanced technologies. As Steve Murray reveals, their work is also expanding the toolset available to underwater archaeology. n estimated 70,000 US last few decades, but a recent initiative 2012 to study coastal current flows for servicemen still remain – Project Recover – is unique within this the US Office of Naval Research. As with missing from the Second burgeoning tradition because it was formed previous fieldwork, the scientists were World War. Approximately with a single purpose: to help settle the accompanied by their latest equipment. two-thirds of them fought fates of missing US airmen who went A mutual friend introduced them to Dr inA the Pacific Theatre, including flyers who down during the Second World War. Pat Scannon, who was working around saw intense combat over and around New The Project Recover team is a the island at the same time as head of Guinea. Many never made it home and are collaboration of organisations which the BentProp Project. This volunteer resting today at the bottom of the bays that blends conventional underwater organisation was dedicated to finding lost surround the island. Finding a submerged archaeology methods with cutting- airmen and had already been searching plane that was lost during military action edge sensing technologies. It all began sites in the Pacific for almost 20 years. is a complicated and expensive exercise. with a lucky meeting. Eric Terrill, of the The three men recognised that a Most warplanes were already damaged Scripps Institute of Oceanography at collaboration could speed up BentProp before crashing, or broke up on impact, the University of California San Diego, Project search efforts while helping to leaving debris scattered across miles of and Mark Moline, of the College of evaluate the capabilities of the scientists’ stated unless otherwise Recover, Project GES: A seabed, mangrove, and jungle. Interest in Earth, Ocean, and Environment at the equipment and, in 2013, the new group IM LL aviation archaeology has grown over the University of Delaware, were in Palau in was established. ‘Our roots are planted in A 38 CURRENTWORLDARCHAEOLOGY Issue 91 SPOTLIGHT seen at the impact site. During a 2005 interview, members of the BentProp Project obtained additional information from a local chief that led to the discovery of a partial wing in nearby mangroves. Physical characteristics and markings confirmed that it belonged to a TBM-1C Avenger. Fresh evaluation of the evidence in 2013 showed that the Avenger case met three important criteria: good information about the crash location, indications that airmen were aboard at the time of the crash, and site conditions ikimedia Commons W that were accessible to divers. As a result, GE: A the wreck became one of the first Project IM Recover expedition targets. LEFT A United States Navy Curtiss SB2C Helldiver oceanography, engineering, archaeology, aircraft lost in the Second World War, and recently aviation, and software development, but Planning the search found resting in the tropical waters of the Republic the entire team pitches in with records Team members integrated all of their of Palau. The Pacific Theatre became a graveyard for many military aviators, but now a new initiative reviews. ‘Everyone searches,’ said Terrill, location data – photos, satellite images, is combining cutting-edge technologies and ‘it helps to look through different lenses.’ written reports, and historical records – archaeological techniques to locate the remains Once the group reaches a consensus on to build a spatial layout of the potential of lost airmen. their priority targets, they schedule the search area. They arranged their images ABOVE A TBM-1C Avenger of VT-51 over Majuro coming year’s expeditions. using photogrammetry (which establishes Atoll in May 1944. A similar aircraft, which was lost in September 1944, became one of the first targets In 2014, an early Project Recover distances and relationships through image of Project Recover. expedition selected an aircraft that never points) and commercial software. LiDAR returned from a raid 70 years earlier: in data, showing underwater topography and conventional archaeology,’ says September 1944, a flight of eight TBM-1C depth profiles, was added, and the entire Drew Pietruszka, the Project Recover Avenger torpedo bombers launched from data set was aligned to selected geographic underwater archaeologist. ‘We just tweak the aircraft carrier USS Intrepid to strike references. The team then compared things.’ Their approach includes standard facilities around Japanese-held Palau. One objects in their layout to equivalent practices such as records reviews, survey of the last planes in the attack dropped its planning, search, and documentation, bombs at an altitude of 305m, but crashed BELOW Fusion of declassified historical black- but stops short of excavation. The US offshore when the resulting explosion and-white photo reconnaissance imagery from Department of Defense POW/MIA damaged its tail. An after-action report Palau, March 1944, showing the intended target of a missing TBM-1C Avenger torpedo bomber. Accounting Agency (DPAA) has the stated that debris was sighted in the The fused data were used to identify the search sole responsibility for collecting and area and that one of its three crewmen region for the REMUS AUV and the probable examining remains from personnel probably bailed out. No survivors were trajectory of the damaged aircraft as it flew offshore. who are missing in action (MIA); Project Recover seeks to bring back the information that helps initiate DPAA recovery missions. Tweaked archaeology The team begins by deciding which candidate sites are worth looking for. This involves pinning down a search location and confirming that missing airmen are associated with the site. Team members review everything they can get their hands on, including combat photos, after-action reports, personnel files, diaries, and eye-witness statements. BentProp members have even attended military reunions to gather information about crash sites. Project Recover combines expertise in www.world-archaeology.com CURRENTWORLDARCHAEOLOGY 39 ABOVE & RIGHT A REMUS 100 AUV over an intact Corsair wreck. The inset image shows the side-scan sonar mosaic generated from multiple REMUS 100 sorties during a wide-area search. Several targets identified during this process were later examined and shown to contain aviation wreckage dating from the Second World War. structures shown in 1940s photographs The result was a composite probability Finding what of the same area. model of the ‘most likely’ crash location. they came for Once this information had been The uncertain last seconds of the Once a wreck is located, the next challenge assembled, Project Recover used both Avenger’s flight path and the influence of is to identify it. ‘We look for multiple lines forensic data analysis and Bayesian decades of ocean currents and tides still left of evidence’, says Pietruszka, ‘to make a probability methods to estimate the the team with a sizable survey task. Project case that will connect a site to a specific loss aircraft impact location. Although Recover employed autonomous underwater incident associated with specific missing Bayesian techniques sound complicated, vehicles (AUVs) equipped with side-scan airmen. We look for data plates, paint they are simply a way to combine sonar for the initial work: identifying schemes, numbers – anything to identify information from multiple, often objects that deserved closer inspection. a plane beyond just its type. We also look conflicting sources, in a manner similar Their torpedo-shaped REMUS 100 (Remote for modifications that might distinguish to the methods used in searches for Environment Monitoring UnitS) vehicles a particular plane, like the bolt pattern more recent air crashes. Now Project could operate for about ten hours, covering of the propeller or its machine-gun serial Recover analysts are helping to elaborate large regions of the seafloor in a back and numbers.’ These examinations must be these procedures for underwater forth ‘mow-the-lawn’ scan pattern. In tight thorough. Another Project Recover team archaeological work. spaces or near underwater obstacles, studied a wreck thought to be a B-24 Using the location of the Avenger’s the team supplemented these surveys Liberator bomber off the coast of Greece. probable bomb target, the position of its with human-operated sensors tethered to Despite gathering significant information partial wing, and eye-witness reports from small boats or carried by divers. Different about the site prior to the expedition, the Avenger’s wingman and from the sensor packages such as multibeam sonar inspection of its landing gear configuration Palauan elder’s interview, it was possible (which covers a smaller scan area at higher showed it to be a British Short Stirling to estimate the aircraft’s crash trajectory. resolution), thermal imaging, and optical bomber. The information was turned over The team then ran numerical simulations cameras were employed as necessary to to the British Ministry of Defence. to construct alternate scenarios of the gather information in different light and Only after a plane’s identity is pinned Avenger crash using their position data, visibility conditions. All of this imagery down does the team begin their painstaking historical reports of the event, and TBM-1C was then stitched together to create a search for personal items like clothing, flight mechanics (turn rate, glide angles, high-resolution mosaic of the entire boots, oxygen masks, or rings that could bank angles, elevation, speed, and so on). search effort. connect individual crewmen to the 40 CURRENTWORLDARCHAEOLOGY Issue 91 SPOTLIGHT LEFT A side-scan image of the TBM-1C Avenger found by Project Recover. The crash is spread across a 70m debris field.
Recommended publications
  • SEA8 Techrep Mar Arch.Pdf
    SEA8 Technical Report – Marine Archaeological Heritage ______________________________________________________________ Report prepared by: Maritime Archaeology Ltd Room W1/95 National Oceanography Centre Empress Dock Southampton SO14 3ZH © Maritime Archaeology Ltd In conjunction with: Dr Nic Flemming Sheets Heath, Benwell Road Brookwood, Surrey GU23 OEN This document was produced as part of the UK Department of Trade and Industry's offshore energy Strategic Environmental Assessment programme. The SEA programme is funded and managed by the DTI and coordinated on their behalf by Geotek Ltd and Hartley Anderson Ltd. © Crown Copyright, all rights reserved Document Authorisation Name Position Details Signature/ Initial Date J. Jansen van Project Officer Checked Final Copy J.J.V.R 16 April 07 Rensburg G. Momber Project Specialist Checked Final Copy GM 18 April 07 J. Satchell Project Manager Authorised final J.S 23 April 07 Copy Maritime Archaeology Ltd Project No 1770 2 Room W1/95, National Oceanography Centre, Empress Dock, Southampton. SO14 3ZH. www.maritimearchaeology.co.uk SEA8 Technical Report – Marine Archaeological Heritage ______________________________________________________________ Contents I LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................5 II ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................7 1. NON TECHNICAL SUMMARY................................................................................8 1.1
    [Show full text]
  • A PUBLICATION of the INTERNATIONAL GROUP for HISTORIC AIRCRAFT RECOVERY Spring 1988 Vol. 4 No. 1
    TIGHAR TRACKS A PUBLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL GROUP FOR HISTORIC AIRCRAFT RECOVERY Spring 1988 Vol. 4 No. 1 Contents SPRING 1988 Overview ..................................................................... 3 ... that they might escape the teeth of time Dear TIGHAR ............................................................ 4 and the hands of mistaken zeal. Project Midnight Ghost ............................................... 6 —JOHN AUBREY B-17E Recovery Expedition ....................................... 14 1660 Operation Sepulchre .................................................. 15 Members’ Exploits ..................................................... 16 TIGHAR (pronounced “tiger”) is the acronym for The Interna- Rumor Mill ............................................................... 17 tional Group for Historic Aircraft Recovery, a non-profit founda- tion dedicated to promoting responsible aviation archeology and Aviation Archeologist ................................................. 18 historic preservation. TIGHAR was incorporated in January 1985 Strictly Business ......................................................... 19 and recognized as a 501(c)(3) public charity by the IRS in Novem- ber of that year. Offices are maintained in Middletown, Delaware COVER: Preserved by the environment which imprisons on the Summit Airport, and staffed by the foundation’s Executive it, the world’s oldest complete and original B-17 Flying Committee, Richard E. Gillespie, Executive Director, and Patricia Fortress waits patiently in the
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Archaeology Technical Report
    Hornsea Project Three Offshore Wind Farm Hornsea Project Three Offshore Wind Farm Preliminary Environmental Information Report: Annex 9.1 – Marine Archaeology Technical Report Date: July 2017 Annex 9.1 – Marine Archaeology Technical Report Preliminary Environmental Information Report July 2017 Environmental Impact Assessment Preliminary Environmental Information Report Liability Volume 5 This report has been prepared by RPS, with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of their contracts with DONG Energy Power (UK) Ltd. Annex 9.1 – Marine Archaeology Technical Report Report Number: P6.5.9.1 Version: Final Date: July 2017 This report is also downloadable from the Hornsea Project Three offshore wind farm website at: www.dongenergy.co.uk/hornseaproject3 DONG Energy Power (UK) Ltd. 5 Howick Place, Prepared by: RPS London, SW1P 1WG Checked by: Julian Carolan and Kieran Bell © DONG Energy Power (UK) Ltd, 2017. All rights reserved Accepted by: Julian Carolan Front cover picture: Kite surfer near one of DONG Energy's UK offshore wind farms © DONG Energy Hornsea Approved by: Sophie Banham Project Three (UK) Ltd., 2016. i Annex 9.1 – Marine Archaeology Technical Report Preliminary Environmental Information Report July 2017 Table of Contents List of Figures 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Figure 2.1: Location of Hornsea Three (the marine archaeology study area), the former Hornsea Zone and
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 35, No. 2 December 2018
    DECEMBER 2018 SOMEWHERE IN THE USA 2018 Bomb Group Reunion History of Crew 49 Our 2018 Reunion By will be found to contain the true was held in Day- Robert M. Sanders facts and incidents of the crew ton, Ohio, Thurs- Bombardier from the time of its formation un- day, September 13, Mowery crew #49 til such time as it becomes dis- 2018 through Sun- 766th Squadron, solved. day, September 16, 461st Bombardment Group (H) 2018. Our reunion It all began in September 1943 home was the Submitted by when the individual members Crowne Plaza Ho- Julie Robinson were ordered to the Army Air tel, which provided Base at Mountain Home, Idaho. complimentary air- P R E F A C E At this base, the individual mem- port shuttle and ar- bers were assigned to the 470th ea destinations On the following pages, will be found the more or less “crew his- within five miles of (Continued on page 8) the hotel. tory” of crew number 49. This Some of our reun- ion committee Service and Sacrifice (Continued on page 4) by Budapest, Hungary during a Inside this issue: Julie Robinson bombing mission on April 13, History of Crew 49 1 1944. When I was young, I spent Part I- The Box of Letters hours searching for photos and Service & Sacrifice 1 sifting through old papers for in- My Uncle, 2nd Lieutenant George 2018 Reunion 1 formation about him. I ques- Lenon Owens, Jr. was a co-pilot tioned my parents and grandpar- Back to Torretta 24 in the Fifteenth Army Air Force, ents about his service and death, 461st Bomb Group, 766th Bomb Torretta Airfield 28 but they would quickly change Squadron during World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Conflict the Archaeology
    THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF CONFLICT Introduction by Richard Morris There can hardly be an English field that does still left with a question: why have the prosaic not contain some martial debris – an earthwork, traces of structures which were often stereotyped There is more to war than a splinter of shrapnel, a Tommy’s button. A and mass-produced become so interesting? weapons and fighting.The substantial part of our archaeological inheritance growth of interest in 20th- has to do with war or defence – hillforts, Roman Part of the answer, I think, is that there is more to century military remains is marching camps, castles, coastal forts, martello war than weapons and fighting. One reason for part of a wider span of social towers, fortified houses – and it is not just sites the growth of interest in 20th-century military evoking ancient conflict for which nations now remains is that it is not a stand-alone movement archaeology care.The 20th century’s two great wars, and the but part of the wider span of social archaeology. tense Cold War that followed, have become It encompasses the everyday lives of ordinary archaeological projects. Amid a spate of public- people and families, and hence themes which ation, heritage agencies seek military installations archaeology has hitherto not been accustomed to of all kinds for protection and display. approach, such as housing, bereavement, mourning, expectations.This wider span has Why do we study such remains? Indeed, should extended archaeology’s range from the nationally we study them? We should ask, for there are important and monumental to the routine and some who have qualms.
    [Show full text]
  • Aardvark Archaeology 2004 Archaeological Investigations at Ilhavo Park (Cjae-53) Duckworth Street and Plymouth Road, St
    Provincial Archaeology Office July 8, 2020 Aardvark Archaeology 2004 Archaeological Investigations at Ilhavo Park (CjAe-53) Duckworth Street and Plymouth Road, St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador. 03.51 2004 Stage 1 HRA of the St. John’s Harbour Clean-Up. Part 1: Water Street, from Hutchings Street to Waldegrave Street. 2005 HRIA for the East Coast Hiking Trail Interpretation on the Mount, Renews, Newfoundland. 05.18 2005 Stage 1 HRIA of the Mortier Bay-North Atlantic Marine Service Centre, Powers Cove, NL. 05.53 2005 HRIA of the Murphy’s Cove Development Project. Collier Point, Trinity Bay, Newfoundland and Labrador. 05.60 2005 HRIA of the South Brook Park Site (DgBj-03). 05.58 (on CD) 2006 Archaeological Monitoring of the 2006 Ferryland Beach Stabilization. 06.01 2006 Stage 1 HROA of 331 Water Street, St. John’s, NL. 2006 Archaeological Assessment of the Mockbeggar Plantation Provincial Historic Site Bonavista, Newfoundland and Labrador. 06.50 2006 Beneath the Big Store: Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment of the Mockbeggar Plantation Provincial Historic Site Bonavista, Newfoundland and Labrador. 06.50.01 2007 HRIA of Berry Island, Point Leamington Newfoundland and Labrador. 07.21 2008 Archaeological Assessment of the Bridge House Property (DdAg-03) Bonavista, Newfoundland and Labrador. 08.11 Adams, W. P. & J. B. Shaw 1967 Studies of Ice Cover on Knob Lake, New Québec. Cahiers de géographie du Québec, 11(22), p. 88-96. Adney, Edwin Tappan & Howard I. Chapelle 1964 The Bark Canoes and Skin Boats of North America. AECOM 2012 Stage 2 Historical Impact Assessment 2012 Strange Lake-Quest Rare Minerals Project Field Survey Results Update.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Aircraft Crash Sites
    2002 Military Aircraft Crash Sites Archaeological guidance on their significance and future management Military aircraft crash sites are an important part of Britain’s military and Belonging to a period still well within living memory, crash sites have significance for aviation heritage. Predominantly dating from World War II, during which there remembrance, commemoration, their was a massive expansion in air activity over the UK, they comprise the buried, cultural value as historic artefacts and the information they contain about both the submerged or surface remains of aircraft, most of which crashed either in circumstances of the loss and of the combat or training. aircraft itself. Crash sites may on occasion Some crash sites are visible, for example as spreads of wreckage within also contain human remains, giving them additional value and status as sacred sites upland environments, or are exposed at low tide. In most cases, however, a and war graves. scatter of surface debris may mask larger deposits, often buried at great depth. It is therefore important that these remains are considered a material matter The initial impetus for recoveries comes from both eyewitness reports and where they are affected by development documentary research.The debris field can be located by systematic walking proposals and local authority development across ploughed fields to identify surface concentrations of wreckage or with a plan policies and where research- or recovery-led excavations are proposed. magnetometer to assess the extent of buried remains, on the basis of which a Where crash sites are thought to be point or points of impact can be estimated.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Crash Sites at Sea: a Scoping Study
    Wessex Archaeology Aircraft Crash Sites at Sea A Scoping Study Archaeological Desk-based Assessment Ref: 66641.02 February 2008 AIRCRAFT CRASH SITES AT SEA: A SCOPING STUDY ARCHAEOLOGICAL DESK-BASED ASSESSMENT:FINAL REPORT Prepared by: Wessex Archaeology Portway House Old Sarum Park Salisbury WILTSHIRE SP4 6EB Prepared for: English Heritage February 2008 Ref: 66641.02 © Wessex Archaeology Limited 2008 Wessex Archaeology Limited is a Registered Charity No.28778 Aircraft Crash Sites at Sea: A Scoping Study Wessex Archaeology 66641.02 AIRCRAFT CRASH SITES AT SEA: A SCOPING STUDY ARCHAEOLOGICAL DESK-BASED ASSESSMENT:FINAL REPORT Ref: 66641.02 Summary Wessex Archaeology have been funded by English Heritage through the Aggregates Levy Sustainability Fund to undertake a scoping study to identify current gaps in data and understanding relating to aircraft crash sites at sea. The study arises partly out of the discovery of aircraft parts and associated human remains as a result of marine aggregate dredging. The objectives of the Scoping Study are as follows: x to review existing literature relating to the archaeology of aircraft crash sites at sea, existing guidance, and the legislative context; x to clarify the range and archaeological potential of aircraft crash sites, by presenting examples of aircraft crash sites, which will include a range of site conditions and mechanisms affecting site survival, their management and investigation; x to establish the relationship, in terms of numbers and composition, between the National Monuments Record
    [Show full text]
  • The Height of Heritage Digging Aviation Archaeology
    Summer 2007 The Official Magazine of California Wing Civil Air Patrol The Height of Heritage Digging Aviation Archaeology Tip of the Wing’s Sword “Saber” Training in NorCal Top Five Finds It’s ESsy Time Again Plus: • Taking Courage from Col. Fred Pitcher • Legally Deploying Cadets • Watching the Skies with Lt. Kevin Lowther EAGLE EYE Mission 05M--21552155––1212 NovNov 0505 –– NearNear TwentyTwenty--ninenine Palms,Palms, CACA 2 2nd Annual ESsy Awards FOR PRELIMINARY USE ONLY 12 Nov 05 84 RADES/OLAD ES Squadron of the Year 5 Eagle Call is an authorized publication serving the ES101 7 interests of the California Wing of the United States The Cutting Edge of Air Force Auxiliary Civil Air Patrol. A private firm that Ground Team Training is not connected with the Department of the Air Force or with the Civil Air Patrol Corporation publishes it. The appearance of advertisements in this publication, including supplements and inserts, does not constitute CAPTAIN’S LOG 16 an endorsement by the U.S. Air Force or CAP of the Redcap in Review products and services advertised herein. Eagle Call encourages contributions from all CAP members, military personnel, and related agencies. ATTITUDE 21 Material must be original, free of copyright constraint, Raise Funds, unpublished, and submitted only to Eagle Call, which reserves the right to approve, reject, edit, abridge or Not Eyebrows expand any submission. Features must be discussed in advance with the Editor, Capt. Greg Solman, at 909- 338-5789. COLUMN 27 Submission guidelines: As a thrice-yearly publication, Bird’s Eye View the magazine is not suitable for dated material on rou- tine Squadron or Wing activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Archaeology of World War Ii Gander
    AVIATION ARCHAEOLOGY OF WORLD WAR II GANDER: AN EXAMINATION OF MILITARY AND CIVILIAN LIFE AT THE NEWFOUNDLAND AIRPORT. by © Lisa M. Daly A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Arts Memorial University of Newfoundland April 2015 St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador ABSTRACT This project examines the Second World War (WWII) history of the Newfoundland Airport (Gander, Newfoundland), with a focus on civilian and military life on the base, and the potential for aviation archaeology to enhance the historical record. To accomplish this, ten WWII era airplane crash sites were examined archaeologically, using a variety of methods depending on the state of the wreck and the environment of the site. On the grounds of the original airbase, the Royal Canadian Air Force Globe Theatre was excavated to determine the viability of excavating areas of the former nearby town site and to examine the material culture of those living at the base. In particular, information was sought on potential interactions between the three main countries residing and working at Gander in WWII; Canada, the United States, and Newfoundland. The aircraft crash sites yielded information about the crashes themselves, modern reuse of sites, and the potential risk of disturbance. They also allowed for further development of archaeological methods to be used at other aviation sites around Newfoundland and Labrador. A major conclusion of this study is that base life was less segregated than official documents indicated, and that there was a significant amount of cooperation and flow of goods between the three countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Archaeology in Central Europe Natascha Mehler Editor Historical Archaeology in Central Europe (Full Color Edition)
    special publicatioN NuMber 10 Historical Archaeology in Central Europe Natascha Mehler Editor Historical Archaeology in Central Europe (Full Color Edition) Natascha Mehler Editor special publicatioN NuMber 10, the society for historical archaeology ©2013 Society for Historical Archaeology 9707 Key West Avenue, Suite 100 Rockville, MD 20850 SHA Journal Editor: J.W. Joseph ISBN:978-1-939531-02-5 Library of Congress Control Number: 2013936866 Published in the United States of America COVER IMAGE: by Thomas Pertlwieser, Department of Prehistory and Medieval Archaeology, University of Vienna. It is a composite of elements from the following images: Wooden gallows and breaking wheels in front of the town walls of Einbeck 1654, by Martin Zeiller (from Zeiller 1654); and Hoard of watches found with a metal de- tector at the Bad Jungbrunn site, Lavant (Photo by H. Stadler, 2008; courtesy of the Department of Archaeology, University of Innsbruck, Austria). BACK COVER IMAGE: The chimneys of Krupp Steel Works in Essen, Germany (courtesy of Stadtbildstelle Essen, ca. 1890. Exact date unknown). Dedicated to Paul Courtney Contents Foreword .................................................................................................................................................... vii I. Development, Current researCh, anD perspeCtIves Breaking New Ground: Historical Archaeology in Central Europe .........................................................11 ...................... 31 Archaeology of the Modern Period in the Czech Territories: A Long
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 17 Offshore Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
    East Anglia THREE Chapter 17 Offshore Archaeology and Cultural Heritage Environmental Statement Volume 1 Document Reference – 6.1.17 Author – Wessex Archaeology East Anglia THREE Limited Date – November 2015 Revision History – Revision A Environmental Statement East Anglia THREE Offshore Windfarm Chapter 17 Offshore Archaeology November 2015 This Page is Intentionally Blank Environmental Statement East Anglia THREE Offshore Windfarm Chapter 17 Offshore Archaeology November 2015 Table of Contents 17 Offshore Archaeology and Cultural Heritage ................................................. 1 17.1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 17.2 Consultation ................................................................................................. 4 17.3 Scope ......................................................................................................... 16 17.3.1 Scope of Assessment .......................................................................................... 16 17.3.2 Study Area........................................................................................................... 16 17.3.3 Embedded Mitigation ......................................................................................... 17 17.3.4 Worst Case .......................................................................................................... 28 17.4 Assessment Methodology ........................................................................... 34 17.4.1
    [Show full text]