MECHANISMS in ENDOCRINOLOGY: Novel Genetic Causes of Short Stature

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MECHANISMS in ENDOCRINOLOGY: Novel Genetic Causes of Short Stature J M Wit and others Genetics of short stature 174:4 R145–R173 Review MECHANISMS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY Novel genetic causes of short stature 1 1 2 2 Jan M Wit , Wilma Oostdijk , Monique Losekoot , Hermine A van Duyvenvoorde , Correspondence Claudia A L Ruivenkamp2 and Sarina G Kant2 should be addressed to J M Wit Departments of 1Paediatrics and 2Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, Email The Netherlands [email protected] Abstract The fast technological development, particularly single nucleotide polymorphism array, array-comparative genomic hybridization, and whole exome sequencing, has led to the discovery of many novel genetic causes of growth failure. In this review we discuss a selection of these, according to a diagnostic classification centred on the epiphyseal growth plate. We successively discuss disorders in hormone signalling, paracrine factors, matrix molecules, intracellular pathways, and fundamental cellular processes, followed by chromosomal aberrations including copy number variants (CNVs) and imprinting disorders associated with short stature. Many novel causes of GH deficiency (GHD) as part of combined pituitary hormone deficiency have been uncovered. The most frequent genetic causes of isolated GHD are GH1 and GHRHR defects, but several novel causes have recently been found, such as GHSR, RNPC3, and IFT172 mutations. Besides well-defined causes of GH insensitivity (GHR, STAT5B, IGFALS, IGF1 defects), disorders of NFkB signalling, STAT3 and IGF2 have recently been discovered. Heterozygous IGF1R defects are a relatively frequent cause of prenatal and postnatal growth retardation. TRHA mutations cause a syndromic form of short stature with elevated T3/T4 ratio. Disorders of signalling of various paracrine factors (FGFs, BMPs, WNTs, PTHrP/IHH, and CNP/NPR2) or genetic defects affecting cartilage extracellular matrix usually cause disproportionate short stature. Heterozygous NPR2 or SHOX defects may be found in w3% of short children, and also rasopathies (e.g., Noonan syndrome) can be found in children without clear syndromic appearance. Numerous other syndromes associated with short stature are caused by genetic defects in fundamental cellular processes, chromosomal European Journal of Endocrinology abnormalities, CNVs, and imprinting disorders. European Journal of Endocrinology (2016) 174, R145–R173 Introduction The fast technological development has caused a flood of stature. In the first decade of the 21st century, the genetic novel discoveries in genetic causes of congenital disorders, toolbox was expanded by whole genome single nucleotide including syndromic and non-syndromic forms of short polymorphism (SNP) array (1) and array-comparative Invited Author’s profile Professor Jan Maarten Wit is currently Professor Emeritus and honorary staff member of the Department of Paediatrics at Leiden University Medical Centre, The Netherlands. Trained as a paediatric endocrinologist, he served as an Associate Professor of Paediatric Endocrinology in Utrecht and Full Professor/Chairman of Paediatrics in Leiden. Most of his research has been focused on the diagnosis and management of growth disorders. Shortly after his PhD thesis (Responses to growth hormone therapy), he founded the Dutch Growth Hormone Advisory Group and the Dutch Growth Hormone Research Foundation’s bureau, instrumental in conducting numerous multicentre clinical trials on the efficacy and safety of growth hormone treatment. In Leiden, he led research projects on regulation of the epiphyseal growth plate and on referral criteria and diagnostic guidelines for short children, but the main subject focus over the last 10 years has been the elucidation of novel genetic causes of short and tall stature. www.eje-online.org Ñ 2016 European Society of Endocrinology Published by Bioscientifica Ltd. DOI: 10.1530/EJE-15-0937 Printed in Great Britain Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 10/01/2021 04:38:46PM via free access Review J M Wit and others Genetics of short stature 174:4 R146 genomic hybridization (array-CGH) (2) for the detection including different clinical entities, previously defined as of microdeletions or microduplications (copy number separate conditions (‘allelic heterogeneity’). On the other variants (CNVs)), the former of which is also able to detect hand, one clinical disorder can be caused by mutations in uniparental disomy. In the second decade an even more different genes (‘locus heterogeneity’) (14). Furthermore, successful tool became available – whole exome sequen- mutations in some genes not only impair GP development cing (WES) – for the detection of gene variants as possible and/or function but also non-skeletal structures, causing causes of congenital disorders (3, 4, 5, 6), with a good associated congenital anomalies (syndromic short diagnostic yield in well-selected patients (6). In general, stature) (17). WES is performed in an index patient and his/her parents The last decades have taught us that with time the (a ‘trio’), and (if available) affected and non-affected clinical phenotype of genetic defects tends to become siblings, to limit the number of informative variants in more variable than initially assumed. The rapid increase the bioinformatic analysis. of the use of SNP arrays and WES in the coming years, and At the same time, information about genes associated the expected appearance of whole genome sequencing with linear growth was collected through non-clinical (WGS), RNA sequencing, and methylation assays, will research, in particular through genome-wide association certainly lead to the discovery of many more novel causes studies (GWAS) and animal and in vitro experiments on of short stature, as well as a further expansion of the epiphyseal growth plate (GP) function. GWAS have shown clinical phenotypes associated with genetic and epigenetic that common SNPs at over 400 loci contribute to variation variants. in normal adult stature, albeit with a small effect size per locus (7). Many of these genes, but also others, have Genetic defects of the GH–insulin-like appeared in gene expression studies in the various zones growth factor 1 axis of the GP (8, 9). For this review we chose to focus on discoveries made The GH––insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) axis is an in the last 10 years (up to August 2015), against the important pathway in the regulation of linear growth, and background of earlier findings, as summarized in previous defects have been found in virtually all components of this reviews by our group (10, 11, 12, 13) and others (5, 14, 15, cascade. Tables 1 and 2 show conditions associated with 16, 17) (for search strategy see section at the end of the GH or IGF1 signalling, divided into three categories: i) GH article). The tables offer the formal names of the disorders deficiency (GHD); ii) GH insensitivity (GHI) and decreased and codes according to online Mendelian inheritance in expression or biologic activity of IGF1 or IGF2; and iii) European Journal of Endocrinology man (OMIM) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/omim), and IGF1 insensitivity. For various genes, a publicly available we aimed at providing the most recent relevant references. database has been established (www.growthgenetics.com) In line with a recent review paper (17), we structured (21), and clinicians and geneticists are encouraged to this review according to a diagnostic classification centred upload clinical and genetic data of additional cases. on the GP. In the GP, chondrocytes proliferate, hyper- trophy, and secrete cartilage extracellular matrix, under GH deficiency the influence of endocrine and paracrine factors. Thus, in this review successively hormones, paracrine factors, Table 1 shows the gene defects that have been associated matrix molecules, intracellular pathways, and fundamen- with GHD. Many of the proteins encoded by these tal cellular processes will be discussed, followed by CNVs genes are associated with GHD as part of combined and imprinting disorders. Because the GP is the structure pituitary hormone deficiency (CPHD), and function as where linear growth takes place, we prefer this patho- pituitary transcription factors (for detailed information on physiologic classification above the multiple reported associated clinical features and MRI appearances see (5, 22, alternative classifications, for example proportionate vs 23, 24)). A novel endocrine syndrome discovered by our disproportionate short stature; with or without micro- group, immunoglobulin superfamily member 1 (IGSF1) cephaly (18); prenatal vs postnatal onset of growth deficiency syndrome, is primarily characterized by central retardation (19); or growth hormone (GH) deficiency or hypothyroidism and macroorchidism, but can also insensitivity (20). present with hypoprolactinaemia and transient partial A complicating factor in the classification of mono- GHD (25, 26). The association of Netherton syndrome genic disorders is that a variety of mutations in one gene with GH and prolactin deficiency suggests that a defect of can result in a broad phenotypic spectrum, sometimes LEKT1 (encoded by SPINK5) may increase the degradation www.eje-online.org Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 10/01/2021 04:38:46PM via free access Review J M Wit and others Genetics of short stature 174:4 R147 Table 1 Causes of GHD. Disordera Gene(s) Clinical features Inheritance References GHD and potential for CPHD CPHD-1 (613038) POU1F1 GH, PRL, var. TSH def. AR, AD (5, 22, 23) CPHD-2 (262600) PROP1 GH, PRL, TSH, LH, FSH, var. ACTH def. AR (5, 22, 23) Pituitary can be enlarged.
Recommended publications
  • A Genetic Screening Identifies a Component of the SWI/SNF Complex, Arid1b As a Senescence Regulator
    A genetic screening identifies a component of the SWI/SNF complex, Arid1b as a senescence regulator Sadaf Khan A thesis submitted to Imperial College London for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy MRC Clinical Sciences Centre Imperial College London, School of Medicine July 2013 Statement of originality All experiments included in this thesis were performed by myself unless otherwise stated. Copyright Declaration The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives license. Researchers are free to copy, distribute or transmit the thesis on the condition that they attribute it, that they do not use it for commercial purposes and that they do not alter, transform or build upon it. For any reuse or redistribution, researchers must make clear to others the license terms of this work. 2 Abstract Senescence is an important tumour suppressor mechanism, which prevents the proliferation of stressed or damaged cells. The use of RNA interference to identify genes with a role in senescence is an important tool in the discovery of novel cancer genes. In this work, a protocol was established for conducting bypass of senescence screenings, using shRNA libraries together with next-generation sequencing. Using this approach, the SWI/SNF subunit Arid1b was identified as a regulator of cellular lifespan in MEFs. SWI/SNF is a large multi-subunit complex that remodels chromatin. Mutations in SWI/SNF proteins are frequently associated with cancer, suggesting that SWI/SNF components are tumour suppressors. Here the role of ARID1B during senescence was investigated. Depletion of ARID1B extends the proliferative capacity of primary mouse and human fibroblasts.
    [Show full text]
  • A 10-Year-Old Girl with Foot Pain After Falling from a Tree
    INSIGHTS IN IMAGES CLINICAL CHALLENGECHALLENGE: CASE 1 In each issue, JUCM will challenge your diagnostic acumen with a glimpse of x-rays, electrocardiograms, and photographs of conditions that real urgent care patients have presented with. If you would like to submit a case for consideration, please email the relevant materials and presenting information to [email protected]. A 10-Year-Old Girl with Foot Pain After Falling from a Tree Figure 1. Figure 2. Case A 10-year-old girl presents with pain after falling from a tree, landing on her right foot. On examination, the pain emanates from the second through fifth metatarsals and proxi- mal phalanges. View the images taken and con- sider what the diagnosis and next steps would be. Resolution of the case is described on the next page. www.jucm.com JUCM The Journal of Urgent Care Medicine | February 2019 37 INSIGHTS IN IMAGES: CLINICAL CHALLENGE THE RESOLUTION Figure 1. Mediastinal air Figure 1. Differential Diagnosis Pearls for Urgent Care Management and Ⅲ Fracture of the distal fourth metatarsal Considerations for Transfer Ⅲ Plantar plate disruption Ⅲ Emergent transfer should be considered with associated neu- Ⅲ Sesamoiditis rologic deficit, compartment syndrome, open fracture, or vas- Ⅲ Turf toe cular compromise Ⅲ Referral to an orthopedist is warranted in the case of an in- Diagnosis tra-articular fracture, or with Lisfranc ligament injury or ten- Angulation of the distal fourth metatarsal metaphyseal cortex derness over the Lisfranc ligament and hairline lucency consistent with fracture. Acknowledgment: Images courtesy of Teleradiology Associates. Learnings/What to Look for Ⅲ Proximal metatarsal fractures are most often caused by crush- ing or direct blows Ⅲ In athletes, an axial load placed on a plantar-flexed foot should raise suspicion of a Lisfranc injury 38 JUCM The Journal of Urgent Care Medicine | February 2019 www.jucm.com INSIGHTS IN IMAGES CLINICAL CHALLENGE: CASE 2 A 55-Year-Old Man with 3 Hours of Epigastric Pain 55 years PR 249 QRSD 90 QT 471 QTc 425 AXES P 64 QRS -35 T 30 Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genetical Society of Great Britain
    Heredity 59 (1987) 151—160 The Genetical Society of Great Britain THEGENETICAL SOCIETY (Abstracts of papers presented at the TVVO HUNDRED AND FIFTH MEETING of the Society held on Friday, 14th and Saturday, 15th November 1986 at UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, LONDON) 1. Selection of somatic cell D. J. Porteous, P. A. Boyd, N. D. Hastie and hybrids with specific chromosome V. van Heyningen content for mapping the WAGR MAC Clinical and Population Cytogenetics Unit, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, syndrome Edinburgh EH4 2XU. J. M. Fletcher, H. Morrison, J. A. Fantes, Clonedprobes for a number of available chromo- A. Seawright, S. Christie, D. J. Porteous, some ii assigned genes were used to define the N. D. Hastie and V. van Heyningen extent of deletions associated with the Wilms' MAC Clinical and Population Cytogenetics Unit, tumour, aniridia, genitourinary abnormalities and Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, mental retardation (WAGR) syndrome. Establish- Edinburgh EH4 2XU. ing reliable dosage studies for a number of different probes has proved difficult. We have therefore WAGR(Wilms tumour, aniridia, genitourinary abnormalities and mental retardation) syndrome concentrated on segregating the deleted chromo- is frequently associated with deletions on the short some 11 from a number of patients in somatic cell arm of chromosome 11. The deletions vary in size hybrids and analysing DNA from these to produce but always include part of band lipl3. To home a consistent map of chromosome lip. At the same in on the Wilms tumour and aniridia loci the end time we have determined the deletion breakpoints points of the different deletion breakpoints need at a molecular level and shown that the results are to be defined at the DNA level.
    [Show full text]
  • Next Generation Sequencing Panels for Disorders of Sex Development
    Next Generation Sequencing Panels for Disorders of Sex Development Disorders of Sex Development – Overview Disorders of sex development (DSDs) occur when sex development does not follow the course of typical male or female patterning. Types of DSDs include congenital development of ambiguous genitalia, disjunction between the internal and external sex anatomy, incomplete development of the sex anatomy, and abnormalities of the development of gonads (such as ovotestes or streak ovaries) (1). Sex chromosome anomalies including Turner syndrome and Klinefelter syndrome as well as sex chromosome mosaicism are also considered to be DSDs. DSDs can be caused by a wide range of genetic abnormalities (2). Determining the etiology of a patient’s DSD can assist in deciding gender assignment, provide recurrence risk information for future pregnancies, and can identify potential health problems such as adrenal crisis or gonadoblastoma (1, 3). Sex chromosome aneuploidy and copy number variation are common genetic causes of DSDs. For this reason, chromosome analysis and/or microarray analysis typically should be the first genetic analysis in the case of a patient with ambiguous genitalia or other suspected disorder of sex development. Identifying whether a patient has a 46,XY or 46,XX karyotype can also be helpful in determining appropriate additional genetic testing. Abnormal/Ambiguous Genitalia Panel Our Abnormal/Ambiguous Genitalia Panel includes mutation analysis of 72 genes associated with both syndromic and non-syndromic DSDs. This comprehensive panel evaluates a broad range of genetic causes of ambiguous or abnormal genitalia, including conditions in which abnormal genitalia are the primary physical finding as well as syndromic conditions that involve abnormal genitalia in addition to other congenital anomalies.
    [Show full text]
  • Nucleotide Excision Repair Gene ERCC2 and ERCC5 Variants Increase Risk of Uterine Cervical Cancer
    pISSN 1598-2998, eISSN 2005-9256 Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(2):708-714 http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.098 Original Article Open Access Nucleotide Excision Repair Gene ERCC2 and ERCC5 Variants Increase Risk of Uterine Cervical Cancer Jungnam Joo, PhD 1, Kyong-Ah Yoon, PhD 2, Tomonori Hayashi, PhD 3, Sun-Young Kong, MD, PhD 4, Hye-Jin Shin, MS 5, Boram Park, MS 1, Young Min Kim, PhD 6, Sang-Hyun Hwang, MD, PhD 7, Jeongseon Kim, PhD 8, Aesun Shin, MD, PhD 8,9 , Joo-Young Kim, MD, PhD 5,10 1Biometric Research Branch, 2Lung Cancer Branch, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea, 3Department of Radiobiology and Molecular Epidemiology, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan, 4Translational Epidemiology Research Branch and Department of Laboratory Medicine, 5Radiation Medicine Branch, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea, 6Department of Statistics, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan, 7Hematologic Malignancy Branch and Department of Laboratory Medicine, 8Molecular Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Center, Goyang, 9Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 10 Center for Proton Therapy, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea Supplementary Data Table of Contents Supplementary Fig. S1 ........................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Supplementary Table 1 .........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Mechanisms of Disease in Children: a New Look
    Genetic Mechanisms of Disease in Children: A New Look Laurie Demmer, MD Tufts Medical Center and the Floating Hospital for Children Boston, MA Traditionally genetic disorders have been linked to the ‘one gene-one protein-one disease’ hypothesis. However recent advances in the field of molecular biology and biotechnology have afforded us the opportunity to greatly expand our knowledge of genetics, and we now know that the mechanisms of inherited disorders are often significantly more complex, and consequently, much more intriguing, than originally thought. Classical mendelian disorders with relatively simple genetic mechanisms do exist, but turn out to be far more rare than originally thought. All patients with sickle cell disease for example, carry the same A-to-T point mutation in the sixth codon of the beta globin gene. This results in a glutamate to valine substitution which changes the shape and the function of the globin molecule in a predictable way. Similarly, all patients with achondroplasia have a single base pair substitution at nucleotide #1138 of the FGFR3 gene. On the other hand, another common inherited disorder, cystic fibrosis, is known to result from changes in a specific transmembrane receptor (CFTR), but over 1000 different disease-causing mutations have been reported in this single gene. Since most commercial labs only test for between 23-100 different mutations, interpreting CFTR mutation testing is significantly complicated by the known risk of false negative results. Many examples of complex, or non-Mendelian, inheritance are now known to exist and include disorders of trinucleotide repeats, errors in imprinting, and gene dosage effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Full Page
    CCR PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY SERIES CCR Pediatric Oncology Series Recommendations for Childhood Cancer Screening and Surveillance in DNA Repair Disorders Michael F. Walsh1, Vivian Y. Chang2, Wendy K. Kohlmann3, Hamish S. Scott4, Christopher Cunniff5, Franck Bourdeaut6, Jan J. Molenaar7, Christopher C. Porter8, John T. Sandlund9, Sharon E. Plon10, Lisa L. Wang10, and Sharon A. Savage11 Abstract DNA repair syndromes are heterogeneous disorders caused by around the world to discuss and develop cancer surveillance pathogenic variants in genes encoding proteins key in DNA guidelines for children with cancer-prone disorders. Herein, replication and/or the cellular response to DNA damage. The we focus on the more common of the rare DNA repair dis- majority of these syndromes are inherited in an autosomal- orders: ataxia telangiectasia, Bloom syndrome, Fanconi ane- recessive manner, but autosomal-dominant and X-linked reces- mia, dyskeratosis congenita, Nijmegen breakage syndrome, sive disorders also exist. The clinical features of patients with DNA Rothmund–Thomson syndrome, and Xeroderma pigmento- repair syndromes are highly varied and dependent on the under- sum. Dedicated syndrome registries and a combination of lying genetic cause. Notably, all patients have elevated risks of basic science and clinical research have led to important in- syndrome-associated cancers, and many of these cancers present sights into the underlying biology of these disorders. Given the in childhood. Although it is clear that the risk of cancer is rarity of these disorders, it is recommended that centralized increased, there are limited data defining the true incidence of centers of excellence be involved directly or through consulta- cancer and almost no evidence-based approaches to cancer tion in caring for patients with heritable DNA repair syn- surveillance in patients with DNA repair disorders.
    [Show full text]
  • Seq2pathway Vignette
    seq2pathway Vignette Bin Wang, Xinan Holly Yang, Arjun Kinstlick May 19, 2021 Contents 1 Abstract 1 2 Package Installation 2 3 runseq2pathway 2 4 Two main functions 3 4.1 seq2gene . .3 4.1.1 seq2gene flowchart . .3 4.1.2 runseq2gene inputs/parameters . .5 4.1.3 runseq2gene outputs . .8 4.2 gene2pathway . 10 4.2.1 gene2pathway flowchart . 11 4.2.2 gene2pathway test inputs/parameters . 11 4.2.3 gene2pathway test outputs . 12 5 Examples 13 5.1 ChIP-seq data analysis . 13 5.1.1 Map ChIP-seq enriched peaks to genes using runseq2gene .................... 13 5.1.2 Discover enriched GO terms using gene2pathway_test with gene scores . 15 5.1.3 Discover enriched GO terms using Fisher's Exact test without gene scores . 17 5.1.4 Add description for genes . 20 5.2 RNA-seq data analysis . 20 6 R environment session 23 1 Abstract Seq2pathway is a novel computational tool to analyze functional gene-sets (including signaling pathways) using variable next-generation sequencing data[1]. Integral to this tool are the \seq2gene" and \gene2pathway" components in series that infer a quantitative pathway-level profile for each sample. The seq2gene function assigns phenotype-associated significance of genomic regions to gene-level scores, where the significance could be p-values of SNPs or point mutations, protein-binding affinity, or transcriptional expression level. The seq2gene function has the feasibility to assign non-exon regions to a range of neighboring genes besides the nearest one, thus facilitating the study of functional non-coding elements[2]. Then the gene2pathway summarizes gene-level measurements to pathway-level scores, comparing the quantity of significance for gene members within a pathway with those outside a pathway.
    [Show full text]
  • Autism Multiplex Family with 16P11.2P12.2 Microduplication Syndrome in Monozygotic Twins and Distal 16P11.2 Deletion in Their Brother
    European Journal of Human Genetics (2012) 20, 540–546 & 2012 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 1018-4813/12 www.nature.com/ejhg ARTICLE Autism multiplex family with 16p11.2p12.2 microduplication syndrome in monozygotic twins and distal 16p11.2 deletion in their brother Anne-Claude Tabet1,2,3,4, Marion Pilorge2,3,4, Richard Delorme5,6,Fre´de´rique Amsellem5,6, Jean-Marc Pinard7, Marion Leboyer6,8,9, Alain Verloes10, Brigitte Benzacken1,11,12 and Catalina Betancur*,2,3,4 The pericentromeric region of chromosome 16p is rich in segmental duplications that predispose to rearrangements through non-allelic homologous recombination. Several recurrent copy number variations have been described recently in chromosome 16p. 16p11.2 rearrangements (29.5–30.1 Mb) are associated with autism, intellectual disability (ID) and other neurodevelopmental disorders. Another recognizable but less common microdeletion syndrome in 16p11.2p12.2 (21.4 to 28.5–30.1 Mb) has been described in six individuals with ID, whereas apparently reciprocal duplications, studied by standard cytogenetic and fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques, have been reported in three patients with autism spectrum disorders. Here, we report a multiplex family with three boys affected with autism, including two monozygotic twins carrying a de novo 16p11.2p12.2 duplication of 8.95 Mb (21.28–30.23 Mb) characterized by single-nucleotide polymorphism array, encompassing both the 16p11.2 and 16p11.2p12.2 regions. The twins exhibited autism, severe ID, and dysmorphic features, including a triangular face, deep-set eyes, large and prominent nasal bridge, and tall, slender build. The eldest brother presented with autism, mild ID, early-onset obesity and normal craniofacial features, and carried a smaller, overlapping 16p11.2 microdeletion of 847 kb (28.40–29.25 Mb), inherited from his apparently healthy father.
    [Show full text]
  • ARID1B Is a Specific Vulnerability in ARID1A-Mutant Cancers The
    ARID1B is a specific vulnerability in ARID1A-mutant cancers The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Helming, K. C., X. Wang, B. G. Wilson, F. Vazquez, J. R. Haswell, H. E. Manchester, Y. Kim, et al. 2014. “ARID1B is a specific vulnerability in ARID1A-mutant cancers.” Nature medicine 20 (3): 251-254. doi:10.1038/nm.3480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm.3480. Published Version doi:10.1038/nm.3480 Accessed February 16, 2015 10:04:32 PM EST Citable Link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:12987227 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University's DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA (Article begins on next page) NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Nat Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 September 01. NIH-PA Author ManuscriptPublished NIH-PA Author Manuscript in final edited NIH-PA Author Manuscript form as: Nat Med. 2014 March ; 20(3): 251–254. doi:10.1038/nm.3480. ARID1B is a specific vulnerability in ARID1A-mutant cancers Katherine C. Helming1,2,3,4,*, Xiaofeng Wang1,2,3,*, Boris G. Wilson1,2,3, Francisca Vazquez5, Jeffrey R. Haswell1,2,3, Haley E. Manchester1,2,3, Youngha Kim1,2,3, Gregory V. Kryukov5, Mahmoud Ghandi5, Andrew J. Aguirre5,6,7, Zainab Jagani8, Zhong Wang9, Levi A. Garraway6, William C. Hahn6,7, and Charles W.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genetic Basis for Skeletal Diseases
    insight review articles The genetic basis for skeletal diseases Elazar Zelzer & Bjorn R. Olsen Harvard Medical School, Department of Cell Biology, 240 Longwood Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA (e-mail: [email protected]) We walk, run, work and play, paying little attention to our bones, their joints and their muscle connections, because the system works. Evolution has refined robust genetic mechanisms for skeletal development and growth that are able to direct the formation of a complex, yet wonderfully adaptable organ system. How is it done? Recent studies of rare genetic diseases have identified many of the critical transcription factors and signalling pathways specifying the normal development of bones, confirming the wisdom of William Harvey when he said: “nature is nowhere accustomed more openly to display her secret mysteries than in cases where she shows traces of her workings apart from the beaten path”. enetic studies of diseases that affect skeletal differentiation to cartilage cells (chondrocytes) or bone cells development and growth are providing (osteoblasts) within the condensations. Subsequent growth invaluable insights into the roles not only of during the organogenesis phase generates cartilage models individual genes, but also of entire (anlagen) of future bones (as in limb bones) or membranous developmental pathways. Different mutations bones (as in the cranial vault) (Fig. 1). The cartilage anlagen Gin the same gene may result in a range of abnormalities, are replaced by bone and marrow in a process called endo- and disease ‘families’ are frequently caused by mutations in chondral ossification. Finally, a process of growth and components of the same pathway.
    [Show full text]
  • Circle Applicable Codes
    IDENTIFYING INFORMATION (please print legibly) Individual’s Name: DOB: Last 4 Digits of Social Security #: CIRCLE APPLICABLE CODES ICD-10 ICD-10 ICD-9 DIAGNOSTIC ICD-9 DIAGNOSTIC PRIMARY ICD-9 CODES CODE CODE PRIMARY ICD-9 CODES CODE CODE Abetalipoproteinemia 272.5 E78.6 Hallervorden-Spatz Syndrome 333.0 G23.0 Acrocephalosyndactyly (Apert’s Syndrome) 755.55 Q87.0 Head Injury, unspecified – Age of onset: 959.01 S09.90XA Adrenaleukodystrophy 277.86 E71.529 Hemiplegia, unspecified 342.9 G81.90 Arginase Deficiency 270.6 E72.21 Holoprosencephaly 742.2 Q04.2 Agenesis of the Corpus Callosum 742.2 Q04.3 Homocystinuria 270.4 E72.11 Agenesis of Septum Pellucidum 742.2 Q04.3 Huntington’s Chorea 333.4 G10 Argyria/Pachygyria/Microgyria 742.2 Q04.3 Hurler’s Syndrome 277.5 E76.01 or 758.33 Aicardi Syndrome 333 G23.8 Hyperammonemia Syndrome 270.6 E72.4 Alcohol Embryo and Fetopathy 760.71 F84.5 I-Cell Disease 272.2 E77.0 Anencephaly 655.0 Q00.0 Idiopathic Torsion Dystonia 333.6 G24.1 Angelman Syndrome 759.89 Q93.5 Incontinentia Pigmenti 757.33 Q82.3 Asperger Syndrome 299.8 F84.5 Infantile Cerebral Palsy, unspecified 343.9 G80.9 Ataxia-Telangiectasia 334.8 G11.3 Intractable Seizure Disorder 345.1 G40.309 Autistic Disorder (Childhood Autism, Infantile 299.0 F84.0 Klinefelter’s Syndrome 758.7 Q98.4 Psychosis, Kanner’s Syndrome) Biotinidase Deficiency 277.6 D84.1 Krabbe Disease 333.0 E75.23 Canavan Disease 330.0 E75.29 Kugelberg-Welander Disease 335.11 G12.1 Carpenter Syndrome 759.89 Q87.0 Larsen’s Syndrome 755.8 Q74.8 Cerebral Palsy, unspecified 343.69 G80.9
    [Show full text]