DOCSLIB.ORG

Intergenerational Memory, the Labour Party, and the Ghost of the Two Tony’S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Intergenerational memory, The Labour Party, and The Ghost of the Two Tony’s Daniel James Lewis MA by Research University of York History July 2018 Abstract This dissertation will examine the Labour Party memberships’ understanding of its own history. By use of an online survey the individual grassroots membership was contacted and asked to give their opinion regarding certain major leaders, figures, internal and external events in the recent history of the party. These results were cross referenced with published studies carried out by Seyd and Whiteley in the 1980s and 90s. The results illustrate that there is a generational split in the collective memory of the party between two groups, basically these two groups are younger and older party generations. This split can be explained by the ‘reminiscence bump’ which is a concept from the world of psychology. Those who identify with a particular ideological section of the party are much more likely to have a different perceptions of the past compared with other sections. As Whiteley has shown, people join the party for either instrumental or expressive reasons and that those two reasons become manifest in different perceptions of the two figures of Tony Blair and Tony Benn. These differing perceptions reinforce the idea that the past is always viewed through the lens of the present. This dissertation offers a framework for historians to use when analysing popular cultural perceptions of history with generational memory at its heart. 2 List of Contents Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………….p2 List of Tables, Graphs and Images……………………………………………………..p4 Declaration…………………………....…………………………………………………...p8 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………..…..p10 Historiography……………………………………………………….…………………..p13 Part Two Construction of the Survey………………………………………………….p31 OMOV and CLIV…………………………………………………………………….…p104 The Ghost of The Two Tony’s………………………………………………………..p130 Where Next?........................................................................................................p142 The Future of History………………………………………………………………….p145 List of Abbreviations…………………………………………………………………..p151 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………p152 3 List of Tables, Graphs, and Images Tables Table 1.1 - Leaders General……………………………………………………………………...p49 Table 1.2 - Figures General………………………………………………………………………p50 Table 1.3 - Internal Events General……………………………………………………………...p52 Table 1.4 - External Events General…………………………………………………………..…p53 Table 2.1 - Acquiring Bump Labour Leaders Ratings…………………….……………………p58 Table 2.2 - Post Bump Labour Leaders Ratings………………………………………………..p59 Table 2.3 - Acquiring Bump Labour Figures Ratings…………………………………………..p60 Table 2.4 - Post Bump Labour Figures Ratings………………………………………………...p60 Table 2.5 - Acquiring Bump Labour Internal Events Ratings…………………………….……p61 Table 2.6 - Post Bump Labour Internal Events Ratings………….……………………………p62 Table 2.7 - Acquiring Bump External Events Ratings……………………………….…………p63 Table 2.8 - Post Bump External Events Ratings…………………………………….…………p63 Table 3.1 - Leaders ‘Soft’ Bennite……………………………………………………………….p79 Table 3.2 - Leaders ‘Hard’ Bennite………………………………………………………………p79 Table 3.3 - Leaders ‘Soft’ Blairite…………………………………………………………..……p79 Table 3.4 - Leaders ‘Hard’ Blairite……………………………………………………….………p80 Table 3.5 - Figures ‘Soft’ Bennite…………………………………………………………….…p80 Table 3.6 - Figures ‘Hard’ Bennite………………………………………………………………p81 Table 3.7 - Figures ‘Soft’ Blairite……………………………………………………..……….…p81 Table 3.8 - Figures ‘Hard’ Bennite……………………………………………………….……...p82 Table 3.9 - Internal Events ‘Soft’ Bennite……………………………………………….………p83 Table 3.10 - Internal Events ‘Hard’ Bennite…………………………………………….………p83 Table 3.11 - Internal Events ‘Soft’ Blairite…………………………………………….………...p84 Table 3.12 - Internal Events ‘Hard’ Blairite…………………………………………….…….…p84 Table 3.13 - External Events ‘Soft’ Bennite………………………………………….…………p85 Table 3.14 - External Events ‘Hard’ Bennite…………………………………………….……..p85 Table 3.15 - External Events ‘Soft’ Blairite……………………………………………….…….p85 Table 3.16 – External Events ‘Hard’ Blairite…………………………………………….……..p86 4 Graphs Graph 1.1 - When Did You First Join the Labour Party? General……………………………p45 Graph 1.2 - What Age Range Are You In? General……………………………………………p45 Graph 1.3 - Have You Resign Your Membership At Any Time Following Your Decision To Join? General………………………………………………………………………………………p44 Graph 1.4 - If Yes, What Year Did You Leave? General………………………………………p46 Graph 1.5 - What Was Your Main Reason for Leaving? General…………………………….p48 Graph 1.6 - Perception of 1980s Members that Were Left Wing General…………...………p54 Graph 1.7 - Perception of 1990s Members that Were Right Wing General…………………p55 Graph 1.8 - The Labour Party Should Focus on Gaining Power? General………………….p56 Graph 1.9 - The Labour Party Should Always Put Commitment to its Principles First Even at the Expense of Electoral Success General…………………….……………………………….p57 Graph 1.10 - The Labour Party Membership Was More Working Class in the 1980s General…………………………………………………...…………………………………………p58 Graph 1.11 - The Labour Party Membership Was More Middle Class in the 1990s General…………………………………………………………………………………….………..p59 Graph 1.12 - Did ‘New’ Labour Mark a Decisive Break with the History, Heritage and Traditions of The Labour Party? General………………………………………….…….………p59 Graph 2.1 - Perception of 1980s Members that Were Left Wing? Current Bump………..…p66 Graph 2.2 - Perception of 1980s Members that Were Left Wing? Post Bump…………...…p67 Graph 2.3 - Perception of 1990s Members that Were Right Wing? Current Bump……...…p67 Graph 2.4 - Perception of 1990s Members that Were Right Wing? Post Bump……….……p68 Graph 2.5 - The Labour Party Should Focus on Gaining Power? Current Bump…….……p69 Graph 2.6 - The Labour Party Should Focus on Gaining Power? Post Bump………………p70 Graph 2.7 - The Labour Party Should Always Put Commitment to its Principles First Even at the Expense of Electoral Success? Current Bump………………………………………….…p70 Graph 2.8 - The Labour Party Should Always Put Commitment to its Principles First Even at the Expense of Electoral Success? Post Bump…………………………………………..……p71 Graph 2.9 - The Labour Party Membership Was More Working Class in the 1980s? Current Bump…………………………………………………………………………………………..……p72 Graph 2.10 - The Labour Party Membership Was More Working Class in the 1980s? Post Bump.………………………………………………………………………………………….……p72. Graph 2.11 - The Labour Party Membership Was More Middle Class in the 1990s? Current Bump………………………………………………………………………………………….……p73 5 Graph 2.12 - The Labour Party Membership Was More Middle Class in the 1990s? Post Bump………………………………………………………………………………………....…..…p73 Graph 2.13 - Did ‘New’ Labour Mark a Decisive Break with the History, Heritage and Traditions of The Labour Party? Current Bump……………………………………..…..….….p74 Graph 2.14 - Did ‘New’ Labour Mark a Decisive Break with the History, Heritage and Traditions of The Labour Party? Post Bump………………………………………..…….…….p75 Graph 3.1 - Age Range ‘Soft’ Bennite…………………………………………………….....…..p76 Graph 3.2 - Age Range ‘Hard’ Bennite…………………………………………………..…..….p77 Graph 3.3 - Age Range ‘Soft’ Blairite…………………………………………………………….p77 Graph 3.4 - Age Range ‘Hard’ Blairite………………………………………………….….…….p78 Graph 3.5 - Perception of 1980s Members that Were Left Wing ‘Soft’ Bennite………….…p87 Graph 3.6 - Perception of 1980s Members that Were Left Wing ‘Hard’ Bennite……………p87 Graph 3.7 - Perception of 1980s Members that Were Left Wing ‘Soft’ Blairite………..……p88 Graph 3.8 - Perception of 1980s Members that Were Left Wing ‘Hard’ Blairite……….……p88 Graph 3.9 - Perception of 1990s Members that Were Right Wing ‘Soft’ Bennite…….……..p89 Graph 3.10 - Perception of 1990s Members that Were Right Wing ‘Hard’ Bennite……...…p89 Graph 3.11 - Perception of 1990s Members that Were Right Wing ‘Soft’ Blairite……..……p90 Graph 3.12 - Perception of 1990s Members that Were Right Wing ‘Hard’ Blairite…...….…p90 Graph 3.13 - The Labour Party Should Focus on Gaining Power? ‘Soft’ Bennite……..…...p91 Graph 3.14 - The Labour Party Should Focus on Gaining Power? ‘Hard’ Bennite…………p93 Graph 3.15 - The Labour Party Should Focus on Gaining Power? ‘Soft’ Blairite………...…p93 Graph 3.16 - The Labour Party Should Focus on Gaining Power? ‘Hard’ Blairite…….……p93 Graph 3.17 - The Labour Party Should Always Put Commitment to its Principles First Even at the Expense of Electoral Success ‘Soft’ Bennite……………………………………………….p94 Graph 3.18 - The Labour Party Should Always Put Commitment to its Principles First Even at the Expense of Electoral Success ‘Hard’ Bennite………………………………………………p95 Graph 3.19 - The Labour Party Should Always Put Commitment to its Principles First Even at the Expense of Electoral Success ‘Soft’ Blairite…………………………………………..……p95 Graph 3.20 - The Labour Party Should Always Put Commitment to its Principles First Even at the Expense of Electoral Success ‘Hard’ Blairite………………………………………….……p96 Graph 3.21 - The Labour Party Membership Was More Working Class in the 1980s ‘Soft’ Bennite………………………………………………………………………………………………p97 Graph 3.22 - The Labour Party Membership Was More Working Class in the 1980s ‘Hard’ Bennite……………………………………………………………………………………..……….p97 Graph 3.23 - The Labour Party Membership Was More Working Class in the 1980s ‘Soft’ Blairite…………………………………………………………………………...………………….p98 6 Graph 3.24 - The Labour Party Membership Was More Working Class in the 1980s ‘Hard’ Blairite………………………………………………………………………………..…………….p99 Graph 3.25 - The Labour Party Membership Was More Middle Class in the 1990s ‘Soft’ Bennite…………………………………………………………………………………………….p100 Graph 3.26
Recommended publications
  • Father of the House Sarah Priddy

    Father of the House Sarah Priddy

    BRIEFING PAPER Number 06399, 17 December 2019 By Richard Kelly Father of the House Sarah Priddy Inside: 1. Seniority of Members 2. History www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Number 06399, 17 December 2019 2 Contents Summary 3 1. Seniority of Members 4 1.1 Determining seniority 4 Examples 4 1.2 Duties of the Father of the House 5 1.3 Baby of the House 5 2. History 6 2.1 Origin of the term 6 2.2 Early usage 6 2.3 Fathers of the House 7 2.4 Previous qualifications 7 2.5 Possible elections for Father of the House 8 Appendix: Fathers of the House, since 1901 9 3 Father of the House Summary The Father of the House is a title that is by tradition bestowed on the senior Member of the House, which is nowadays held to be the Member who has the longest unbroken service in the Commons. The Father of the House in the current (2019) Parliament is Sir Peter Bottomley, who was first elected to the House in a by-election in 1975. Under Standing Order No 1, as long as the Father of the House is not a Minister, he takes the Chair when the House elects a Speaker. He has no other formal duties. There is evidence of the title having been used in the 18th century. However, the origin of the term is not clear and it is likely that different qualifications were used in the past. The Father of the House is not necessarily the oldest Member.
  • The Wilson Doctrine Pat Strickland

    The Wilson Doctrine Pat Strickland

    BRIEFING PAPER Number 4258, 19 June 2015 By Cheryl Pilbeam The Wilson Doctrine Pat Strickland Inside: 1. Introduction 2. Historical background 3. The Wilson doctrine 4. Prison surveillance 5. Damian Green 6. The NSA files and metadata 7. Labour MPs: police monitoring www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Number 4258, 19 June 2015 2 Contents Summary 3 1. Introduction 4 2. Historical background 4 3. The Wilson doctrine 5 3.1 Criticism of the Wilson doctrine 6 4. Prison surveillance 9 4.1 Alleged events at Woodhill prison 9 4.2 Recording of prisoner’s telephone calls – 2006-2012 10 5. Damian Green 12 6. The NSA files and metadata 13 6.1 Prism 13 6.2 Tempora and metadata 14 Legal challenges 14 7. Labour MPs: police monitoring 15 Cover page image copyright: Chamber-070 by UK Parliament image. Licensed under CC BY 2.0 / image cropped 3 The Wilson Doctrine Summary The convention that MPs’ communications should not be intercepted by police or security services is known as the ‘Wilson Doctrine’. It is named after the former Prime Minister Harold Wilson who established the rule in 1966. According to the Times on 18 November 1966, some MPs were concerned that the security services were tapping their telephones. In November 1966, in response to a number of parliamentary questions, Harold Wilson made a statement in the House of Commons saying that MPs phones would not be tapped. More recently, successive Interception of Communications Commissioners have recommended that the forty year convention which has banned the interception of MPs’ communications should be lifted, on the grounds that legislation governing interception has been introduced since 1966.
  • 13273 PSA Conf Programme 2011 PRINT

    13273 PSA Conf Programme 2011 PRINT

    Transforming Politics: New Synergies 61st Annual International Conference 18 – 21 April 2011 Novotel London West, London, UK PSA 61st Annual International Conference London, 18 –21 April 2011 www.psa.ac.uk/2011 A Word of Welcome Dear Conference delegate You are extremely welcome to this 61st Conference of the Political Studies Association, held in the UK capital. The recently refurbished Hammersmith Novotel hotel offers high quality conference facilities all under one roof. We are expecting well over 500 delegates, representing over 50 different countries. There are more than 190 panels, as well as the workshops on Monday, building on last year’s innovation, and as a new addition, dedicated posters sessions. There are also three receptions. The Conference theme is ‘Transforming Politics: New Synergies’. Keynote speakers include Professor Carole Pateman, President of APSA, revisiting the concept of participatory democracy and Professor Iain McLean giving the Government and Opposition-sponsored Leonard Schapiro lecture on the subject of coalition and minority government. On Wednesday, our after-dinner speaker is Professor Tony Wright, (UCL and Birkbeck College) former MP and Chair of the Public Administration Select Committee. Amongst other highlights, Professor Vicente Palermo will discuss Anglo-Argentine relations and John Denham MP will talk on ‘English questions’ and the Labour Party’ and Sir Michael Aaronson, former Director General of Save the Children, will be drawing on his experience working in crisis situations to reflect on whether we had a choice in Libya today. Despite the worsening economic and policy environment, this has been a particularly active and successful year for the Association. Overall membership figures, including those for the new Teachers’ Section, continue to rise.

  • London Elections

    London Local Elections 2018 – Time to Raise the Red Flag? On May 3rd Londoners in the capital’s 32 boroughs* will have the chance to decide who runs their local services for the next four years. Labour is widely expected to make significant gains and tighten its political hold on the city. This has big implications for development and housing delivery in the capital. Many of the incoming, first-time Labour councillors are likely to be from the far left of the party and view the private sector with hostility. Given that it is private developers that build the bulk of London’s new homes, if these political purists want to deliver more than hot air for their constituents they may soon find themselves on a collision course with reality. The Politics of London Government Labour running London is not a new phenomenon. Since The Current State of Play 1 the 1960s Labour politicians have dominated the inner London boroughs with the exception of Westminster and Last local elections - 2014: Kensington & Chelsea. The richer, outer suburban boroughs • Labour controls 20 boroughs 4 of like Bromley, Kingston and Richmond have traditionally which have directly elected mayors voted Tory. This is known as the “Donut” effect. The arrival – Hackney, Lewisham, Newham and of the Liberal Democrats in the 1980s shook up the model Tower Hamlets. when they won in places like Southwark, Richmond and • Conservatives nine. Sutton but the general principle still applies. • Liberal Democrats one. • In Havering no group has overall Indeed the last time the Conservatives controlled a majority control.
  • Television Dramas Have Increasingly Reinforced a Picture of British Politics As ‘Sleazy’

    Television Dramas Have Increasingly Reinforced a Picture of British Politics As ‘Sleazy’

    Television dramas have increasingly reinforced a picture of British politics as ‘sleazy’ blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/new-labour-sleaze-and-tv-drama/ 4/22/2014 There were 24 TV dramas produced about New Labour and all made a unique contribution to public perceptions of politics. These dramas increasingly reinforced a picture of British politics as ‘sleazy’ and were apt to be believed by many already cynical viewers as representing the truth. Steven Fielding argues that political scientists need to look more closely at how culture is shaping the public’s view of party politics. On the evening of 28th February 2007, 4.5 million ITV viewers saw Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott receive a blowjob. Thankfully, they did not see the real Prescott on the screen but instead actor John Henshaw who played him in Confessions of a Diary Secretary. Moreover, the scene was executed with some discretion: shot from behind a sofa all viewers saw was the back of the Deputy Prime Minister’s head. Prescott’s two-year adulterous affair with civil servant Tracey Temple had been splashed across the tabloids the year before and ITV had seen fit to turn this private matter into a broad comedy, one which mixed known fact with dramatic invention. Confessions of a Diary Secretary is just one of twenty-four television dramas produced about New Labour which I discuss in my new article in the British Journal of Politics and International Relations. Some of these dramas were based on real events, others elliptically referenced the government and its personnel; but all made, I argue, a unique contribution to public perceptions of politics.
  • Fabian Society

    Fabian Society

    SOS POLITICAL SCIENCE & PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION M.A POLITICAL SCIENCE II SEM POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY: MODERN POLITICAL THOUGHT, THEORY & CONTEMPORARY IDEOLOGIES UNIT-III Topic Name-fabian socialism WHAT IS MEANT BY FABIAN SOCIALISM? • The Fabian Society is a British socialistorganisation whose purpose is to advance the principles of democratic socialism via gradualist and reformist effort in democracies, rather than by revolutionary overthrow WHO STARTED THE FABIAN SOCIETY? • Its nine founding members were Frank Podmore, Edward R. Pease, William Clarke, Hubert Bland, Percival Chubb, Frederick Keddell, H. H. Champion, Edith Nesbit, and Rosamund Dale Owen. WHO IS THE PROPOUNDER OF FABIAN SOCIALISM? • In the period between the two World Wars, the "Second Generation" Fabians, including the writers R. H. Tawney, G. D. H. Cole and Harold Laski, continued to be a major influence on socialistthought. But the general idea is that each man should have power according to his knowledge and capacity. WHAT IS THE FABIAN POLICY? • The Fabian strategy is a military strategy where pitched battles and frontal assaults are avoided in favor of wearing down an opponent through a war of attrition and indirection. While avoiding decisive battles, the side employing this strategy harasses its enemy through skirmishes to cause attrition, disrupt supply and affect morale. Employment of this strategy implies that the side adopting this strategy believes time is on its side, but it may also be adopted when no feasible alternative strategy can be devised. HISTORY • This
  • The Wilson Doctrine Samantha Godec

    The Wilson Doctrine Samantha Godec

    BRIEFING PAPER Number 4258, 12 June 2017 By Pat Strickland Joanna Dawson The Wilson Doctrine Samantha Godec Inside: 1. Introduction 2. Historical background 3. The Wilson doctrine 4. The NSA files and metadata 5. The Investigatory Powers Tribunal judgment 6. Prison surveillance 7. Labour MPs: police monitoring 8. Investigatory Powers Act 2016 www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Number 4258, 12 June 2017 2 Contents Summary 3 1. Introduction 4 2. Historical background 4 3. The Wilson doctrine 5 3.1 Criticism of the Wilson doctrine 6 4. The NSA files and metadata 9 4.1 Prism 9 4.2 Tempora and metadata 10 5. The Investigatory Powers Tribunal judgment 11 Emergency debate 12 6. Prison surveillance 13 6.1 Alleged events at Woodhill prison 13 6.2 Recording of prisoners’ telephone calls – 2006-2012 14 7. Labour MPs: police monitoring 15 8. Investigatory Powers Act 2016 16 Cover page image copyright: Chamber-070 by UK Parliament image. Licensed under CC BY 2.0 / image cropped 3 The Wilson Doctrine Summary The convention that MPs’ communications should not be intercepted by police or security services is known as the ‘Wilson Doctrine’. It is named after the former Prime Minister Harold Wilson who announced the policy in 1966. According to The Times on 18 November 1966, some MPs were concerned that the security services were tapping their telephones. In November 1966, in response to a number of parliamentary questions, Harold Wilson made a statement in the House of Commons saying that MPs phones would not be tapped.
  • Coventry in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography

    Coventry in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography

    Coventry in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography is the national record of people who have shaped British history, worldwide, from the Romans to the 21st century. The Oxford DNB (ODNB) currently includes the life stories of over 60,000 men and women who died in or before 2017. Over 1,300 of those lives contain references to Coventry, whether of events, offices, institutions, people, places, or sources preserved there. Of these, over 160 men and women in ODNB were either born, baptized, educated, died, or buried there. Many more, of course, spent periods of their life in Coventry and left their mark on the city’s history and its built environment. This survey brings together over 300 lives in ODNB connected with Coventry, ranging over ten centuries, extracted using the advanced search ‘life event’ and ‘full text’ features on the online site (www.oxforddnb.com). The same search functions can be used to explore the biographical histories of other places in the Coventry region: Kenilworth produces references in 229 articles, including 44 key life events; Leamington, 235 and 95; and Nuneaton, 69 and 17, for example. Most public libraries across the UK subscribe to ODNB, which means that the complete dictionary can be accessed for free via a local library. Libraries also offer 'remote access' which makes it possible to log in at any time at home (or anywhere that has internet access). Elsewhere, the ODNB is available online in schools, colleges, universities, and other institutions worldwide. Early benefactors: Godgifu [Godiva] and Leofric The benefactors of Coventry before the Norman conquest, Godgifu [Godiva] (d.
  • 93 Report Oliver Legacy of Roy Jenkins

    93 Report Oliver Legacy of Roy Jenkins

    Reports The legacy of Roy Jenkins Evening meeting, 27 June 2016, with John Campbell and David Steel. Chair: Dick Newby. Report by Douglas Oliver n Monday 27 June, the Liberal ushering in a self-proclaimed ‘permis- founder of the SDP and Liberal Demo- Democrat History Group met sive society’. Jenkins is often seen as one crats – as a giant of post-war politics. Oin Committee Room 4A of of the most important British politicians Campbell looked at the enduring resil- the House of Lords to discuss the legacy never to have become prime minister, ience of Jenkins’ three main themes. of Roy Jenkins. The timing was apt but and this was reflected, also, in the third Campbell shared the platform with for- deeply bittersweet, following as it did in central issue of enduring relevance: Jen- mer Liberal leader, David Steel. the wake of Britain’s decision to leave the kins’ efforts to realign the centre-left and Campbell began with an exploration European Union in its referendum, on centre of British politics. of Jenkins’ legacy as Home Secretary in the longest day of the year, the Thursday The event was chaired by Dick the 1960s, as well as his less celebrated before. The discussion, thirteen years Newby, who worked with the SDP in but fruitful time in the role between 1974 after the death of one of the most impor- the early days after its establishment, and and ’76. Jenkins was, Campbell felt, ‘the tant facilitators of Britain’s European knew Jenkins well, before being elevated right man, in the right job at the right engagement, reflected on how capricious to the House of Lords in September 1997.
  • Generational Divide Will Split Cult of Corbyn the Internal Contradictions Between the Youthful Idealists and Cynical Old Trots Are Becoming Increasingly Exposed

    Generational Divide Will Split Cult of Corbyn the Internal Contradictions Between the Youthful Idealists and Cynical Old Trots Are Becoming Increasingly Exposed

    The Times, 26th September 2017: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/comment/generational-divide- will-split-cult-of-corbyn-c0sbn70mv Generational divide will split cult of Corbyn The internal contradictions between the youthful idealists and cynical old Trots are becoming increasingly exposed Rachael Sylvester A graffiti artist is spray-painting a wall when I arrive at The World Transformed festival, organised by Jeremy Corbyn’s supporters in Momentum. Inside, clay-modelling is under way in a creative workshop that is exploring “the symbiotic relationship between making and thinking”. A “collaborative quilt” hangs in the “creative chaos corner” next to a specially commissioned artwork celebrating the NHS. The young, mainly female volunteers who are staffing the event talk enthusiastically about doing politics in a different way and creating spaces where people can come together to discuss new ideas. It is impossible to ignore the slightly cult-like atmosphere: one member of the audience is wearing a T-shirt printed with the slogan “Corbyn til I die”. But this four-day festival running alongside the official Labour Party conference in Brighton has far more energy and optimism than most political events. There have been two late-night raves, sessions on “acid Corbynism”, and a hackathon, seeking to harness the power of the geeks to solve technological problems. With its own app, pinging real-time updates to followers throughout the day, and a glossy pastel-coloured brochure, the Momentum festival has an upbeat, modern feel. As well as sunny optimism there is a darker, bullying side Then I go to a packed session on “Radical Democracy and Twenty- First Century Socialism”.
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

    Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

    Wednesday Volume 494 24 June 2009 No. 98 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 24 June 2009 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2009 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; Tel: 0044 (0) 208876344; e-mail: [email protected] 777 24 JUNE 2009 778 rightly made the case. I hope she will understand when I House of Commons point her to the work of the World Bank and other international financial institutions on infrastructure in Wednesday 24 June 2009 Ukraine and other countries. We will continue to watch the regional economic needs of Ukraine through our involvement with those institutions. The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock Mr. Gary Streeter (South-West Devon) (Con): Given PRAYERS the strategic significance of Ukraine as a political buffer zone between the EU and Russia, does the Minister not think that it was perhaps an error of judgment to close [MR.SPEAKER in the Chair] the DFID programme in Ukraine last year? It would be an utter tragedy if Ukraine’s democracy should fail, so BUSINESS BEFORE QUESTIONS should we not at the very least be running significant capacity-building programmes to support it? SPOLIATION ADVISORY PANEL Resolved, Mr. Thomas: We are running capacity-building programmes on democracy and good governance through That an Humble Address be presented to Her Majesty, That she will be graciously pleased to give directions that there be laid the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.
  • The Ghostmodern: Revisionist Haunting in Turn-Of-The-Century American Literature (1887-1910)

    The Ghostmodern: Revisionist Haunting in Turn-Of-The-Century American Literature (1887-1910)

    THE GHOSTMODERN: REVISIONIST HAUNTING IN TURN-OF-THE-CENTURY AMERICAN LITERATURE (1887-1910) by MATH TRAFTON B.A., University of Colorado, 2003 B.S., University of Colorado, 2003 M.A., University of Colorado, 2005 M.A., University of Colorado, 2008 A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Comparative Literature 2013 This dissertation titled: The Ghostmodern: Revisionist Haunting in Turn-of-the-Century American Literature (1887-1910) written by Math Trafton has been approved for the Department of Comparative Literature Dr. Karen Jacobs, committee chair Dr. Mark Leiderman Dr. Eric White Dr. Sue Zemka Date The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we Find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards Of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. iii Trafton, Math (Ph.D., Comparative Literature) The Ghostmodern: Revisionist Haunting in Turn-of-the-Century American Literature (1887- 1910) Dissertation directed by Associate Professor Karen Jacobs This project attempts to identify and explain numerous significant transformations in the genre of the literary ghost story in the period roughly contemporary with the earliest emergence of literary Modernism. Through a detailed examination of the literary encounters with invisibility in pivotal American ghost stories from the end of the twentieth century, the project considers the rich literary trope of ghostly haunting according to its capacity to provoke an engagement with marginalized, liminal spaces. In traditional ghost stories, however, as ghosts are ultimately overcome and order is restored, normative structures resume, and such engagements are trivialized.