153 Mathematics 155 Audiobooks 156 Subrights Information 157 International Rights 158 Best of the Backlist 162 Index 164 Order Information
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Learning from Casework
LEARNING FROM CASEWORK An analysis of institutional innovations and development opportunities in the Utrecht youth care system Jan-Kees Helderman Jonathan Zeitlin Charles Sabel GAINS 1 Learning from casework An analysis of institutional innovations and development opportunities in the Utrecht youth care system Authors: Dr. Jan-Kees Helderman, Radboud University, Nijmegen Prof. Jonathan Zeitlin, University of Amsterdam Prof. Charles Sabel, Columbia Law School, Columbia University, New York Contact: Dr. Jan-Kees Helderman, Public Administration Department, Institute for Management Research, Radboud University, Nijmegen. Tel. 024 3612031 / email: [email protected] This research was carried out in full independence with the permission and cooperation of the Municipality of Utrecht and Lokalis. The research was funded by the researchers themselves. Illustration on front page: M.C. Escher Drawing Hands (©2017 The M.C. Escher Company, The Netherlands). Nijmegen, Amsterdam, New York, January 2020 2 Table of Contents Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 4 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 The Utrecht youth care system ................................................................................................. 7 1.2 Research structure ................................................................................................................... -
Full Article in PDF Format
Acta Historica Tallinnensia, 2020, 26, 79–102 https://doi.org/10.3176/hist.2020.1.04 ESTONIAN MODERN HISTORY IN THE TWENTYFIRST CENTURY Karsten BRÜGGEMANNa and Bradley D. WOODWORTHb a Tallinna Ülikool, Humanitaarteaduste Instituut, Ajaloo, arheoloogia ja kunstiajaloo keskus, Narva mnt 25, 10120 Tallinn, Estonia; [email protected] b History Program, University of New Haven, 300 Boston Post Road, West Haven, CT 06516 USA; [email protected] This article presents a short overview of Estonian and international research on the nineteenth century in Estonia during the decades since the reestablishment of independence in 1991, with a focus on work published in the twentyfirst century. The authors discuss the most important directions of re search – socioeco nomic history in rural and urban environments, Estonian nationalism and the devel opment of ethnic milieus of Baltic Germans and Russians, the history of Estonia as part of a larger empire and, albeit very briefly, also cultural history. The authors also identify a number of topics still in need of attention by scholars. For historians writing in European languages, the notion of writing about the nine teenth century as the period 1800 to 1900 has for several decades been supplanted by the argument that as a temporal framework, the period from the beginning of the French Revolution in 1789 to the outbreak of war in 1914 simply makes much more sense. Even for the present authors, writing about the historiography of a land which the first of these events did not immediately affect, it is a bit artificial to cut the “long nineteenth century” short since there is hardly any study on Estonian history that uses exactly the time frame from 1800 to 1900.1 For the purpose of this article, as requested by the editor, we nevertheless focus on this “arithmetic” period in order to avoid overlaps with the contributions in this special issue on early modern and twentieth century history. -
Friend Or Femme Fatale?: Olga Novikova in the British Press, 1877-1925
FRIEND OR FEMME FATALE?: OLGA NOVIKOVA IN THE BRITISH PRESS, 1877-1925 Mary Mellon A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of History Chapel Hill 2010 Approved by: Louise McReynolds Donald J. Raleigh Jacqueline M. Olich i ABSTRACT MARY MELLON: Friend or Femme Fatale?: Olga Novikova in the British Press, 1877-1925 (Under the direction of Dr. Louise McReynolds) This thesis focuses on the career of Russian journalist Olga Alekseevna Novikova (1840-1925), a cosmopolitan aristocrat who became famous in England for her relentless advocacy of Pan-Slavism and Russian imperial interests, beginning with the Russo- Turkish War (1877-78). Using newspapers, literary journals, and other published sources, I examine both the nature of Novikova’s contributions to the British press and the way the press reacted to her activism. I argue that Novikova not only played an important role in the production of the discourse on Russia in England, but became an object of that discourse as well. While Novikova pursued her avowed goal of promoting a better understanding between the British and Russian empires, a fascinated British press continually reinterpreted Novikova’s image through varying evaluations of her nationality, gender, sexuality, politics and profession. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS FRIEND OR FEMME FATALE?: OLGA NOVIKOVA IN THE BRITISH PRESS, 1877-1925……………….…………...……………………….1 Introduction……………………………………………………………….1 The Genesis of a “Lady Diplomatist”…………………………………...11 Novikova Goes to War…………………………………………………..14 Novikova After 1880…………………………………………………….43 Conclusion……………………………………………………………….59 Epilogue: The Lady Vanishes..………………………………………….60 BIBLIOGRAPHY……………………………………………………………….63 iii The removal of national misunderstandings is a task which often baffles the wisdom of the greatest statesmen, and defies the effort of the most powerful monarchs. -
German Historical Institute London Bulletin Vol 38 (2016)
BOOK REVIEWS FIONA J. GRIFFITHS and JULIE HOTCHIN (eds.), Partners in Spirit: Women, Men, and Religious Life in Germany, 1100–1500, Medieval Wo - men: Texts and Contexts, 24 (Turnhout: Brepols, 2014), x + 430 pp. ISBN 978 2 503 54096 2. €100.00 This collection of essays is dedicated to the question of how men and women lived and worked together in medieval religious houses. This starting point may surprise some readers, given the common as - sumption that religious women in particular lived in strict enclosure and that men were not allowed to enter their convents, except, that is, for clerics who said mass for the women, spiritual fathers who heard their confessions and gave them pastoral guidance, and male relatives who had a special right to visit their sisters and daughters. All of which brings us directly to the heart of the matter. The issue addressed in this volume originates in the prohibition on women tak- ing higher orders and in the close connections between religious women and their secular relatives which arose not least from their financial affairs. Considering that cohabitation was a common and everyday situation in female monasteries and collegiate churches, the subject has hitherto received insufficient attention from researchers. Yet the problems of cohabitation, particularly the threat it posed to the women’s celibacy, were repeatedly addressed in medieval letters, hagiographical and historical texts, charters, sermons, visitation records, and the normative texts of monasticism, as Fiona J. Griffiths (New York) and Julie Hotchin (Canberra) show in their introduction (pp. 1–46). The volume gathers together essays which investigate the every- day routine of male–female relations within male and female monas- teries which were not double houses, using case studies from German-speaking Europe between the twelfth and the sixteenth cen- turies. -
Dorothea Lieven and Russia's Informal Diplomacy Between 1812 and 1834
The Princess Stateswoman: Dorothea Lieven and Russia’s Informal Diplomacy Between 1812 and 1834 Julia ten Bos Master thesis Supervisor: Dr. J. H. C. Kern Russian and Eurasian studies Leiden University Word count: 20 751 Table of content 1. Introduction 2 2. Dorothea’s upbringing, marriage and personality 7 3. Interpretations of Dorothea’s role and influence 16 4. The Russian Empire and foreign affairs in Europe 23 5. Dorothea’s diplomatic techniques 29 6. Political Results and Processes 39 Conclusion 50 Bibliography 54 1 Introduction “There never figured on the Courtly stage a female intriguer more restless, more arrogant, more mischievous, more ... odious and insufferable than this supercilious Ambassadress.”1 - The Times This fragment described Dorothea Lieven (Дарья Христофоровна Ливен, 1785- 1857), a nineteenth century figure. She was notorious in both Russia and Great Britain for a variety of reasons. Considering her reputation in 19th century diplomatic circles, it is surprising that Dorothea is not a well-known figure today. Her husband Christopher Andreyevich Lieven (Христофор Андреевич Ливен, 1774 – 1838) was the Russian ambassador to England and represented Russia in London between 1812 and 1834. Dorothea joined him in the move to England, where she established herself as a diplomatic force in the Russian embassy. Beside diplomatic involvement, she was a sensation in England’s high society and an esteemed patroness of Almack’s, London’s exclusive social club. Here she introduced the waltz in England in 1813. However, it is unlikely that the anonymous author from the Times would have described her as “mischievous” and “ supercilious” for introducing a dance to the ballrooms of English high society. -
Athens Journal of Mediterranean Studies
Athens Journal of Mediterranean Studies Quarterly Academic Periodical, Volume 7, Issue 2, April 2021 URL: https://www.athensjournals.gr/ajms Email: [email protected] e-ISSN: 2407-9480 DOI: 10.30958/ajms Front Pages GREGORY T. PAPANIKOS The European Union’s Recovery Plan: A Critical Evaluation JUAN JOSÉ MORILLAS GUERRERO Global Impact of Digital Transformation on Entrepreneurship: Present Position in Spain NICHOLAS PAPPAS European Officers and the Mainland Irregular Forces on the Ionian Islands, 1798–1814: A Comparison of Command and Tactics MOHAMED EL KHOULI Examining the Trends of Educational Variables in the Past Affecting Egypt’s Ability to Becoming Future-Proof in Facing Unemployment i ATHENS INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATION AND RESEARCH A World Association of Academics and Researchers 8 Valaoritou Str., Kolonaki, 10671 Athens, Greece. Tel.: 210-36.34.210 Fax: 210-36.34.209 URL: https://www.athensjournals.gr/ajms Email: [email protected] Mission ATINER is an Athens-based World Association of Academics and Researchers based in Athens. ATINER is an independent and non-profit Association with a Mission to become a forum where Academics and Researchers from all over the world can meet in Athens, exchange ideas on their research and discuss future developments in their disciplines, as well as engage with professionals from other fields. Athens was chosen because of its long history of academic gatherings, which go back thousands of years to Plato‟s Academy and Aristotle‟s Lyceum. Both these historic places are within walking distance from ATINER‟s downtown offices. Since antiquity, Athens was an open city. In the words of Pericles, Athens“…is open to the world, we never expel a foreigner from learning or seeing”. -
A Numerous Company Sat Down to Dinner, Composed of the Inmates Of
A numerous company sat down to dinner, Still composed of the inmates of the palace, and of The Banqueting people invited from Brighton itself, for this town is Room © Brighton Pavilion frequented by brilliant society in the winter months. Dur: 0.13 The prince had a band of musicians, playing horns and other noisy instruments, which gave a Still maddening performance in the vestibule, during the Portrait King dinner and throughout the evening. (IN FRENCH) George IV, 1828 B&W the prince delighted in it, and often joined in, Dur: 0.05 beating time on the dinner gong. John Evans Baptist Minister and Schoolmaster (Voice of Richard Elfyn) I have gone through the apartments of the royal pavilion, and witnessed the recent improvements, but I dare not trust my pen on so delicate a subject. I shall transcribe an original account of the royal banqueting room, taken from the Bright Herald, on January the 27th 1821. This most splendid and beautiful apartment, Music: 0.58 presents a design, the most striking, involving the intricacies of invention from the minutest objects to the harmonised combinations of the whole. The walls of this apartment are divided into compartments, containing illustrations, of the manners and elegant costumes of the higher order of the Chinese people. These pictures possess great variety, and team with domestic episodes, which are familiar to us. This dome is constructed to represent an eastern sky, partially obscured by the broad and branching foliage of a luxuriant plantain tree. From its truncated centre, Chinese symbols depend, and characterise its apparent use, that of connecting it with the grand lustre, rising thirty feet and, assuming the shape of lotus flowers. -
Reflections on Habermas on Democracy
Ratio Juris. Vol. 12 No. 4 December 1999 (385-416) I~,i ,~ NOTICE: THIS MATERIAL MAY BE float PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT LAW ason (TITLE 17 US CODE) irgu- y be they aent: aps· Reflections on Habermas on 'rsity Democracy 'Law &e40 ,Kiel JOSHUA COHEN* nany Abstract. Jiirgen Habermas is a radical democrat. The source of that self-designation is that his conception of democracy-what he calls "discursive democracy"-is and founded on the ideal of "a self-organizing community of free and equal citizens," co- ordinating their collective affairs through their common reason. The author discusses ris 2: three large challenges to this radical-democratic ideal of collective self-regulation: 1) What is the role of private autonomy in a radical-democratic view? 2) What role does reason play in collective self-regulation? 3) What relevance might a radical- 1-92. democratic outlook have for contemporary democracies? The author addresses these questions by considering Habermas' answers, and then presenting alternative dIain: responses to them. The alternatives are also radical-democratic in inspiration, but they draw on a richer set of normative-political ideas than Habermas wants to rely eview on, and are more ambitious in their hopes for democratic practice. :haft. I. Radical Democracy ris 5: Jirgen Habermas is a radical democrat (Habermas 1996a, xlii-iii). The source of that self-designation is that his conception of democracy-what he calls -sis." "discursive democracy"-is founded on the abstract ideal of "a self-organ- izing community of free and equal citizens," coordinating their collective affairs through their common reason (Habermas 1996a, 7). -
A Constitution of Democratic Experimentalism Michael C
Cornell University Law School Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository Cornell Law Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 3-1998 A Constitution of Democratic Experimentalism Michael C. Dorf Cornell Law School, [email protected] Charles F. Sabel Columbia University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation Dorf, Michael C. and Sabel, Charles F., "A Constitution of Democratic Experimentalism" (1998). Cornell Law Faculty Publications. 120. https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub/120 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW VOL. 98 MARCH 1998 NO. 2 A CONSTITUTION OF DEMOCRATIC EXPERIMENTALISM Michael C. Dorf and CharlesF. Sabel* In this Article, ProfessorsDorf and Sabel identif a new form of govern- ment, democratic experimentalism, in which power is decentralized to enable citizens and other actors to utilize their local knowledge to fit solutions to their individual circumstances, but in which regional and national coor- dinating bodies require actors to share their knowledge with others facing similar problems. This information pooling, informed by the example of novel kinds of coordinationwithin and amongprivate firms, both increases the efficiency of public administration by encouraging mutual learning among its parts and heightens its accountability through participation of citizens in the decisions that affect them. -
Dealing with Russia: As in 1907, Wrong Again
Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 33, Number 7, February 17, 2006 With Russia chairing the Group of Eight industrialized nations for the first time, the London Economist (“he is not the partner the West once hoped for”) and the Wall Street Dealing With Russia: Journal, chief mouthpieces of the London and New York financial oligarchy, also piled on demands that Russia be As in 1907, Wrong Again blocked from trying to accomplish anything substantial through the G-8. Putin has declared his G-8 agenda priorities by Rachel and Allen Douglas to be global energy security, combating the spread of infec- tious diseases, and education. There is some reflection of what is afoot in the fact that Five months ago,1 we told you how the career of Alexander Putin has gone out of his way, since the end of January, to Helphand “Parvus” sheds light on what the neo-con war party, stage a running joke at the expense of some British intelli- grouped around Vice President Dick Cheney, has really been gence operatives, caught in a Moscow park with a malfunc- up to. That is because the hereditary roots of the neo-cons’ tioning electronic dead drop concealed in a rock. “Putin current doctrine and practice of permanent warfare and prolif- knows the British are the problem,” Lyndon LaRouche com- erating regime changes trace back to the Anglo-Venetian op- mented on Feb. 6, “but he has shown no sign of understanding erative Parvus’s early-20th-Century theory and practice of the deeper aspects of the global strategic problem. -
DIRECTLY-DELIBERATIVE POLYARCHY Joshua Cohen And
DIRECTLY-DELIBERATIVE POLYARCHY Joshua Cohen and Charles Sabel[1] 1. INTRODUCTION In this essay we defend a form of democracy that we will call "directly- deliberative polyarchy." We argue that it is an attractive kind of radical, participatory democracy with problem-solving capacities useful under current conditions and unavailable to representative systems. In directly deliberative polyarchy, collective decisions are made through public deliberation in arenas open to citizens who use public services, or who are otherwise regulated by public decisions. But in deciding, those citizens must examine their own choices in the light of the relevant deliberations and experiences of others facing similar problems in comparable jurisdictions or subdivisions of government. Ideally, then, directly deliberative polyarchy combines the advantages of local learning and self-government with the advantages (and discipline) of wider social learning and heightened political accountability that result when the outcomes of many concurrent experiments are pooled to permit public scrutiny of the effectiveness of strategies and leaders. One starting point for our argument is a commonplace of contemporary political debate: that current economic and political institutions are not solving problems they are supposed to solve, in areas of employment, economic growth, income security, education, training, environmental regulation, poverty, housing, social service delivery, or even basic personal safety. A second point of departure is the intrinsic appeal of collective decision-making that proceeds through direct participation by and reason-giving between and among free and equal citizens. Directly-deliberative polyarchy is the natural consequence of both beginnings: desirable both in itself and as a problem- solver. That is what we hope to show, or at least make plausible. -
Full Conference Program
Sunday, 23 August 1st General Assembly; Opening Session Detailed Schedule Sunday 23 August/Dimanche 23 août 1st General Assembly/1ère Assemblée générale 9:15 AM-10 AM Rigistration 10 AM-12 and 1:30 PM-3:20 PM/ 10 h-12 h et 13 h 30-15 h 30 Shandong High Speed Hall, Shangdong Hotel - Opening Statement: Marjatta HIETALA, president of the ICHS/Ouverture : Marjatta Hietala, présidente du CISH - General Secretary‟s Report (2010-2015)/Rapport moral du Secrétaire general (2010-2015) : Robert Frank - Treasurer‟s report/Rapport financier du Trésorier : Laurent Tissot - New members: Presentation of the candidates to ICHS (National Committees and International Affiliated Organizations); discussion and vote /Nouveaux membres : présentation des candidats au CISH (comités nationaux et organisations internationals affiliées) ; discussion et vote - Venue of the General Assembly of 2017: Moscow‟s application; discussion and vote / Lieu de l‘Assemblée générale du CISH en 2017, candidature de Moscou ; discussion et vote - Members of the new Board: outline of the procedure and introduction of the members proposed by the Nominating Committee/ Membres du nouveau bureau : rappel de la procedure et présentation des membres proposés par la commission de nomination - International Prize of History: outline of the procedure 2014-2015; presentation of the result; presentation of the rules governing the future prizes/ Prix international de l‘histoire, présentation de la procédure 2014-2015 et du résultat ; présentation du règlement d‘attribution des prochains prix