DOCSLIB.ORG

Institut IGH Dd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Institut IGH Dd Institut IGH d.d. Regionalni centar Zagreb Janka Rakuše 1, 10000 Zagreb OIB 79766124714 NOSITELJ PROJEKTA: Otok Ugljan d.o.o., Preko ELABORAT ZAŠTITE OKOLIŠA U POSTUPKU OCJENE O POTREBI PROCJENE UTJECAJA ZAHVATA NA OKOLIŠ SUSTAV JAVNE ODVODNJE I PROČIŠĆAVANJA SANITARNIH OTPADNIH VODA AGLOMERACIJE PREKO-KALI Zagreb, travanj 2017. INSTITUT IGH d.d. ZAVOD ZA HIDROTEHNIKU, EKOLOGIJU I ZAŠTITU OKOLIŠA SADRŽAJ: 1. UVOD ................................................................................................ 5 1.1. SUGLASNOST ZA OBAVLJANJE STRUČNIH POSLOVA ZAŠTITE OKOLIŠA ....................... 5 1.2. SUGLASNOST ZA OBAVLJANJE STRUČNIH POSLOVA ZAŠTITE PRIRODE...................... 12 1.3. OBVEZA IZRADE ZAHTJEVA ........................................................................... 16 1.4. SVRHA PODUZIMANJA ZAHVATA ..................................................................... 17 2. PODACI O ZAHVATU I OPIS OBILJEŽJA ZAHVATA ........................................... 19 2.1. PREGLED POSTOJEĆEG STANJA ...................................................................... 22 2.1.1. Postojeće stanje vodoopskrbnog sustava .................................................... 22 2.1.2. Postojeće stanje sustava odvodnje ........................................................... 23 2.2. OPIS PLANIRANOG ZAHVATA – TEHNIČKO RJEŠENJE ............................................ 33 2.2.1. Opis zahvata sustava odvodnje ................................................................ 33 2.2.2. Pročišćavanje otpadnih voda .................................................................. 36 2.3. VARIJANTNA RJEŠENJA ................................................................................ 47 2.3.1. Opis rješenja za varijantu 1A .................................................................. 47 2.3.2. Opis rješenja za varijantu 1B .................................................................. 47 2.3.3. Opis rješenja za varijantu 2A .................................................................. 49 2.3.4. Opis rješenja za varijantu 2B .................................................................. 49 2.3.5. Opis rješenja za varijantu 3B – transport otpadnih voda na UPOV-u Zadar Centar .. 50 3. PODACI O LOKACIJI I OPIS LOKACIJE ZAHVATA............................................. 51 3.1. OSNOVNI PODACI O LOKACIJI ZAHVATA ............................................................ 51 3.1.1. Administrativno-teritorijalni obuhvat zahvata .............................................. 51 3.1.2. Stanovništvo i gospodarstvo .................................................................... 52 3.1.3. Turizam ............................................................................................ 53 3.1.4. Meteorološke i klimatološke značajke ....................................................... 53 3.1.5. Geološke značajke ............................................................................... 60 3.1.6. Tektonski odnosi i seizmičnost ................................................................ 63 3.1.7. Pedološke značajke .............................................................................. 65 3.1.8. Hidrografske i hidrološke značajke ........................................................... 66 3.1.9. Vodna tijela na području zahvata ............................................................. 68 3.1.10. Poplavna područja ............................................................................... 76 3.1.11. Osjetljiva i zaštićena područja ................................................................ 79 3.1.12. Kvaliteta mora .................................................................................... 80 3.1.13. Bioraznolikost ..................................................................................... 82 3.1.14. Šumski ekosustavi i šumarstvo ................................................................. 94 3.1.15. Kulturno-povijesna baština ..................................................................... 94 3.1.16. Krajobraz .......................................................................................... 96 3.2. ANALIZA PROSTORNO-PLANSKE DOKUMENTACIJE ............................................... 97 3.2.1. Prostorni plan Zadarske županije ........................................................... 97 3.2.2. Prostorni plan uređenja Općine Preko .................................................... 112 3.2.3. Prostorni plan uređenja Općine Kali ....................................................... 130 4. OPIS MOGUĆIH ZNAČAJNIJIH UTJECAJA ZAHVATA NA OKOLIŠ TIJEKOM IZGRADNJE I KORIŠTENJA ZAHVATA ........................................................................ 137 4.1. UTJECAJ ZAHVATA NA VODE I VODNA TIJELA .................................................. 137 4.1.1. Utjecaji tijekom izgradnje zahvata .......................................................... 137 4.1.2. Utjecaji tijekom korištenja ................................................................... 137 4.2. UTJECAJ ZAHVATA NA MORE ....................................................................... 138 4.2.1. Utjecaj tijekom izgradnje zahvata .......................................................... 138 4.2.2. Utjecaj tijekom korištenja zahvata.......................................................... 138 4.3. UTJECAJ ZAHVATA NA TLO ......................................................................... 148 4.3.1. Utjecaj tijekom izgradnje zahvata .......................................................... 148 4.3.2. Utjecaj tijekom korištenja zahvata.......................................................... 148 ELABORAT ZAŠTITE OKOLIŠA U POSTUPKU OCJENE O POTREBI PROCJENE UTJECAJA NA OKOLIŠ: SUSTAV JAVNE ODVODNJE I PROČIŠĆAVANJA SANITARNIH OTPADNIH VODA AGLOMERACIJE PREKO-KALI Stranica 3 od 188 INSTITUT IGH d.d. ZAVOD ZA HIDROTEHNIKU, EKOLOGIJU I ZAŠTITU OKOLIŠA 4.4. UTJECAJ ZAHVATA NA KVALITETU ZRAKA ...................................................... 148 4.4.1. Utjecaj tijekom pripreme i izgradnje zahvata .......................................... 148 4.4.2. Utjecaj tijekom korištenja zahvata ........................................................ 148 4.5. UTJECAJ KLIMATSKIH PROMJENA ................................................................. 151 4.5.1. Utjecaj tijekom izgradnje zahvata .......................................................... 151 4.5.2. Utjecaj tijekom korištenja zahvata.......................................................... 151 4.6. UTJECAJ ZAHVATA NA BIORAZNOLIKOST ........................................................ 172 4.6.1. Utjecaj tijekom izgradnje zahvata .......................................................... 172 4.6.2. Utjecaj tijekom korištenja zahvata.......................................................... 173 4.7. UTJECAJ ZAHVATA NA ŠUMSKE EKOSUSTAVE I ŠUMARSTVO ................................ 173 4.7.1. Utjecaj tijekom izgradnje zahvata .......................................................... 173 4.7.2. Utjecaj tijekom korištenja zahvata.......................................................... 174 4.8. UTJECAJ ZAHVATA NA KULTURNO-POVIJESNU BAŠTINU ..................................... 174 4.8.1. Utjecaj tijekom izgradnje zahvata .......................................................... 174 4.8.2. Utjecaj tijekom korištenja zahvata.......................................................... 174 4.9. UTJECAJ ZAHVATA NA KRAJOBRAZ ............................................................... 174 4.9.1. Utjecaj tijekom izgradnje i korištenja zahvata ........................................... 174 4.10. UTJECAJ ZAHVATA NA RAZINU BUKE ............................................................. 174 4.10.1. Utjecaji tijekom izgradnje .................................................................... 174 4.10.2. Utjecaji tijekom korištenja ................................................................... 175 4.11. UTJECAJ OD NASTANKA OTPADA .................................................................. 176 4.11.1. Utjecaji tijekom izgradnje .................................................................... 176 4.11.2. Utjecaj tijekom korištenja zahvata.......................................................... 176 4.12. UTJECAJ ZAHVATA NA DRUGE INFRASTRUKTURNE OBJEKTE ............................... 178 4.12.1. Utjecaji tijekom izgradnje .................................................................... 178 4.13. UTJECAJ ZAHVATA NA STANOVNIŠTVO .......................................................... 179 4.13.1. Utjecaji tijekom izgradnje .................................................................... 179 4.13.2. Utjecaji tijekom korištenja ................................................................... 179 4.14. MOGUĆI UTJECAJI U SLUČAJU AKCIDENTA ...................................................... 179 4.15. PREKOGRANIČNI UTJECAJ ........................................................................... 179 4.16. OBILJEŽJA UTJECAJA ................................................................................ 180 5. PRIJEDLOG MJERA ZAŠTITE OKOLIŠA I PROGRAMA PRAĆENJA STANJA OKOLIŠA TIJEKOM IZGRADNJE I KORIŠTENJA ZAHVATA ............................................ 182 6. IZVORI PODATAKA .............................................................................. 184 6.1. POPIS LITERATURE .................................................................................... 184 6.2. PROSTORNO-PLANSKA DOKUMENTACIJA ......................................................... 185 6.3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FEEFHS Journal Volume VII No. 1-2 1999
    FEEFHS Quarterly A Journal of Central & Bast European Genealogical Studies FEEFHS Quarterly Volume 7, nos. 1-2 FEEFHS Quarterly Who, What and Why is FEEFHS? Tue Federation of East European Family History Societies Editor: Thomas K. Ecllund. [email protected] (FEEFHS) was founded in June 1992 by a small dedicated group Managing Editor: Joseph B. Everett. [email protected] of American and Canadian genealogists with diverse ethnic, reli- Contributing Editors: Shon Edwards gious, and national backgrounds. By the end of that year, eleven Daniel Schlyter societies bad accepted its concept as founding members. Each year Emily Schulz since then FEEFHS has doubled in size. FEEFHS nows represents nearly two hundred organizations as members from twenty-four FEEFHS Executive Council: states, five Canadian provinces, and fourteen countries. lt contin- 1998-1999 FEEFHS officers: ues to grow. President: John D. Movius, c/o FEEFHS (address listed below). About half of these are genealogy societies, others are multi-pur- [email protected] pose societies, surname associations, book or periodical publish- 1st Vice-president: Duncan Gardiner, C.G., 12961 Lake Ave., ers, archives, libraries, family history centers, on-line services, in- Lakewood, OH 44107-1533. [email protected] stitutions, e-mail genealogy list-servers, heraldry societies, and 2nd Vice-president: Laura Hanowski, c/o Saskatchewan Genealogi- other ethnic, religious, and national groups. FEEFHS includes or- cal Society, P.0. Box 1894, Regina, SK, Canada S4P 3EI ganizations representing all East or Central European groups that [email protected] have existing genealogy societies in North America and a growing 3rd Vice-president: Blanche Krbechek, 2041 Orkla Drive, group of worldwide organizations and individual members, from Minneapolis, MN 55427-3429.
    [Show full text]
  • Herpetofaunistic Diversity of the Cres-Lošinj Archipelago (Croatian Adriatic)
    University of Sopron Roth Gyula Doctoral School of Forestry and Wildlife Management Sciences Ph.D. thesis Herpetofaunistic diversity of the Cres-Lošinj Archipelago (Croatian Adriatic) Tamás Tóth Sopron 2018 Roth Gyula Doctoral School of Forestry and Wildlife Management Sciences Nature Conservation Program Supervisors: Prof. Dr. Faragó Sándor Dr. Gál János Introduction In recent years the Croatian islands, especially those of the Cres-Lošinj Archipelago became the focus of research of herpetologists. However, in spite of a long interest encompassing more than a hundred years, numerous gaps remain in our herpetological knowledge. For this reason, the author wished to contribute to a better understanding by performing studies outlined below. Aims The first task was to map the distribution of amphibians and reptiles inhabiting the archipelago as data were lacking for several of the smaller islands and also the fauna of the bigger islands was insufficiently known. Subsequently, the faunistic information derived from the scientific literature and field surveys conducted by the author as well as available geological and paleogeological data were compared and analysed from a zoogeographic point of view. The author wished to identify regions of the islands boasting the greatest herpetofaunal diversity by creating dot maps based on collecting localities. To answer the question which snake species and which individuals are going to be a victim of the traffic snake roadkill and literature survey were used. The author also identified where are the areas where the most snakes are hit by a vehicle on Cres. By gathering road-killed snakes and comparing their locality data with published occurrences the author seeked to identify species most vulnerable to vehicular traffic and road sections posing the greatest threat to snakes on Cres Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Hrvatski Jadranski Otoci, Otočići I Hridi
    Hrvatski jadranski otoci, otočići i hridi Sika od Mondefusta, Palagruţa Mjerenja obale istoĉnog Jadrana imaju povijest; svi autori navode prvi cjelovitiji popis otoka kontraadmirala austougarske mornarice Sobieczkog (Pula, 1911.). Glavni suvremeni izvor dugo je bio odliĉni i dosad još uvijek najsustavniji pregled za cijelu jugoslavensku obalu iz godine 1955. [1955].1 Na osnovi istraţivanja skupine autora, koji su ponovo izmjerili opsege i površine hrvatskih otoka i otoĉića većih od 0,01 km2 [2004],2 u Ministarstvu mora, prometa i infrastrukture je zatim 2007. godine objavljena opseţna nova graĊa, koju sad moramo smatrati referentnom [2007].3 No, i taj pregled je manjkav, ponajprije stoga jer je namijenjen specifiĉnom administrativnom korištenju, a ne »statistici«. Drugi problem svih novijih popisa, barem onih objavljenih, jest taj da ne navode sve najmanje otoĉiće i hridi, iako ulaze u konaĉne brojke.4 Brojka 1244, koja je sada najĉešće u optjecaju, uopće nije dokumentirana.5 Osnovni izvor za naš popis je, dakle, [2007], i u graniĉnim primjerima [2004]. U napomenama ispod tablica navedena su odstupanja od tog izvora. U sljedećem koraku pregled je dopunjen podacima iz [1955], opet s obrazloţenjima ispod crte. U trećem koraku ukljuĉeno je još nekoliko dodatnih podataka s obrazloţenjem.6 1 Ante Irić, Razvedenost obale i otoka Jugoslavije. Hidrografski institut JRM, Split, 1955. 2 T. Duplanĉić Leder, T. Ujević, M. Ĉala, Coastline lengths and areas of islands in the Croatian part of the Adriatic sea determined from the topographic maps at the scale of 1:25.000. Geoadria, 9/1, Zadar, 2004. 3 Republika Hrvatska, Ministarstvo mora, prometa i infrastrukture, Drţavni program zaštite i korištenja malih, povremeno nastanjenih i nenastanjenih otoka i okolnog mora (nacrt prijedloga), Zagreb, 30.8.2007.; objavljeno na internetskoj stranici Ministarstva.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Crociere Della Pau Navy
    Le crociere della Pau Navy anno gg nome destinazione finale principali tappe intermedie imbarcazioni Pausailors 1997 9 Croatia Crossing Lussino Veruda, Unje, Cherso Patrizia, Eracles 6 1998 13 Kornati First parco nazionale Krka Silba, Ist, Incoronate, Sebenico Patrizia, Eracles, Cassiodoro 8 1999 15 Back to Kornati Incoronate Premuda, Molat, Telascica, Zut Patrizia, Sole 1, Eracles, Cassiodoro 11 2000 18 Korcula Italiana Korcula Premuda, Trogir, Hvar, Scedro Patrizia, Bate Gnife 2, Sole 2, Eracles, Cassiodoro 15 2001 17 Hrvatska Five parco nazionale Krka Dugi Otok, Piskera, Kakan, Murter Patrizia, Sole 2, Eracles 11 2002 17 Rain & Tears Murter Premuda, Telascica, Piskera, Zut Patrizia, Sole 2, Eracles 11 2003 18 Magica Premuda Premuda Liski, Lussino Patrizia, Sole 3, Eracles 12 2004 14 Olympic Fascination Atene Egina, Poros Vassilios 6 2005 12 Sail, eat & sleep Premuda Brioni, Liski, Lussino Patrizia, Leone 5 2006 14 Dalmazia Crossing Mljet Vis, Lastovo, Korcula, Brac, Hvar Ivka 9 2007 18 Ad est a Ist Ist Liski, Ilovik, Premuda, Silba, Molat Patrizia, Leone 5 2008 24 Talisman 1st Pasman Sakarun, Rava, Sipnate, Iz, Molat Patrizia, Talisman 6 2009 23 Zirje italiana Zirje Ilovik, Ist, Brbinj, Zut, Kakan, Silba Patrizia, Talisman, Birbona 10 2010 24 Kaprije italiana Kaprije Premuda, Zadar, Pasman, Kaprije Gloria, Talisman, Birbona, Ralf 14 2011 18 Do cojo cojo Murvenjak Ist, Iz, Sali, Murvenjak, Preko, Olib Gloria, Birbona 7 2012 20 Discover Cruise Skradin Premuda, Kakan, Skradin, Pag, Rab Talisman, Gloria, Birbona 8 2013 19 Dibesless Zutska Aba Ilovik, Iz, Rava, Molat, Ist, Nerezine Talisman, Birbona 8 2014 21 Starless Rava Unije, Ilovik, Ist, Molat, Rava, Rovigno Gloria, Talisman, Birbona 10 2015 25 Stella First Zut Unije, Ilovik, Ist, Molat, Zut, Parenzo Gloria, Talisman, Birbona 10 2016 15 Zverinac Connection Zverinac Rovigno, Ilovik, Silba, Ist, Zverinac Talisman, Birbona 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Osnovni Geografski Čimbenici Suvremene Preobrazbe Ilovika
    Geoadria Vol. 10 No. 1 21-51 Zadar, 2005. OSNOVNI GEOGRAFSKI ČIMBENICI SUVREMENE PREOBRAZBE ILOVIKA DAMIR MAGAŠ UDK: 911.3:30](497.5 Ilovik) JOSIP FARIČIĆ 913(497.5 Ilovik) ROBERT LONČARIĆ Izvorni znanstveni članak Odjel za geografiju, Sveučilište u Zadru Original scientific paper Department of Geography, University of Zadar Primljeno: 2005-04-21 Received: Otok Ilovik (5,51 km2) zajedno s pripadajućim otočićem Sv. Petrom (0,95 km2) čini najjužniji dio cresko-lošinjske otočne skupine i svojim geografskim smještajem čini svojevrstan most između te otočne skupine i sjevernih otoka zadarskog arhipelaga (Premuda, Silba, Olib, Škarda, Ist.). U sklopu projekta Geografske osnove razvoja malih hrvatskih otoka na temelju višekratnih terenskih istraživanja i analize različitih izvora prostornih podataka obrađena su osnovna obilježja njegove prirodno-geografske osnove, ali i suvremeni i mogućnosti budućega društveno-gospodarskog razvitka. Ključne riječi: Ilovik (otok), prirodno-geografska obilježja, deagrarizacija, deruralizacija, socio-geografska transformacija, turizam, Hrvatska Ilovik Island (5.51 km2) along with adjacent Sv. Petar Islet (0.95 km2) are the most southern part of Cres-Lošinj archipelago, and due to their geographical position, they represent a bridge between the above-mentioned archipelago and northern islands of Zadar archipelago (Premuda, Silba, Olib, Škarda and Ist Islands). This paper was written as a result of several field researches and the analysis of different spatial data sources within the project titled Geographical Bases of the Development of Small Croatian Islands, and it presents basic natural and geographical features of Ilovik Island as well as possibilities for its future socio-economic development. Ključne riječi: Ilovik Island, natural and geographical features, deagrarization, deruralization, socio-geographic transformation, tourism, Croatia.
    [Show full text]
  • Island Adventure Week Custom Experience
    A Northern Adriatic Naval Adventure Inkal d.o.o., OIB: 07531884802, Ante Kovačića 6, Rijeka, HR-51000, Rijeka, Croatia www.inkal.hr, [email protected], +385 (0) 91 151 9230 - 1 - PARTNERSHIPS A Northern Adriatic Naval Adventure Our Offer Getaway Cruise Island Adventure Week Custom Experience a three day cruise in the a seven day cruise in the a special cruise completely adapt- North Adriatic North Adriatic ed to the clients needs and wishes, (3 nights) (7 nights) 7 day minimum stay Inkal d.o.o., OIB: 07531884802, Ante Kovačića 6, Rijeka, HR-51000, Rijeka, Croatia www.inkal.hr, [email protected], +385 (0) 91 151 9230 - 2 - PARTNERSHIPS A Northern Adriatic Naval Adventure Locations Island of Orjule and Palaciol Island of Lošinj Island of Cres: Beli, Krušćica, Valun, Cres, grit, Mala Luka, Vela Luka, Zlatna, Punat, Sv. Island of Ist: Ist, Zapuntel Lubenice, Martinšćica, Ustrine, Osor, Punta Juraj, Mala Jana, Trokul , Fuska, Island of Unije: Unije, Maračol, Ognjišta, Križa, Meli, Pogana. Island of Olib: Slatnica, Olib, Sveti Nikola Mala, Mišnjak Island of Lošinj: Tomasina, Liski, Artatore,Či- Island of Silba: Silba, Dobre Vode Island of Rab: Račb, Kampor, Lopar kat, Vala Engleze, Mali Lošinj, Veli Lošinj, Island of Premuda: Dobra, Široka, Premuda Other islands: Goli Otok, Grgur, Prvić, Molat, Krivica Island of Škarda: Škarda, Gibarica, Loišće Susak, Ilovik Island of Krk: Stara Baška, Nova Baška, Ne- Inkal d.o.o., OIB: 07531884802, Ante Kovačića 6, Rijeka, HR-51000, Rijeka, Croatia www.inkal.hr, [email protected], +385 (0) 91 151 9230 - 3 - PARTNERSHIPS A Northern Adriatic Naval Adventure Price List Getaway Cruise (3 days): 01.03.
    [Show full text]
  • Proforma Faktura 5
    Razvrstavanje otoka u skupine (Članak 2. Zakona o otocima /Narodne novine N 34/99, 149/99, 32/02, 33/06/) „Otoci se glede demografskog stanja i gospodarske razvijenosti razvrstavaju u dvije skupine. U prvoj skupini su sljedeći otoci i otočići: – nedovoljno razvijeni i nerazvijeni: Unije, Susak, Srakane Vele, Srakane Male, Ilovik, Goli, Sv. Grgur, Premuda, Silba, Olib, Škarda, Ist, Molat, Dugi otok, Zverinac, Sestrunj, Rivanj, Rava, Iž, Ošljak, Babac, Vrgada, Prvić (šibensko otočje), Zlarin, Krapanj, Kaprije, Žirje, Veli i Mali Drvenik, Vis, Biševo, Lastovo, Mljet, Šipan, Lopud, Koločep i Lokrum; – mali, povremeno nastanjeni i nenastanjeni: otočići pred Porečom: Frižital, Perila, Reverol, Sv. Nikola, Veliki Školj; otočići pred Vrsarom: Cavata, Figarolica, Galiner, Galopun, Gusti Školj, Kuvrsada, Lakal, Lunga, Salamun, Sv. Juraj, Školjić, Tovarjež, Tuf; otočići pred Rovinjem: Banjol, Figarola, Figarolica, Gustinja, Kolona, Mala Sestrica, Maškin, Pisulj, Pulari, Sturag, Sv. Katarina, Sv. Andrija, Sv. Ivan, Vela Sestrica, Veštar; brijunski otočići: Galija, Gaz, Grunj, Kotež, Krasnica, Mali Brijun, Pusti, Obljak, Supin, Sv. Jerolim, Sv. Marko, Veli Brijun, Vrsar; otočići pred Pulom: Andrija, Fenoliga, Frašker, Fraškerić, Katarina, Uljanik, Veruda; otočići u medulinskom zaljevu: Bodulaš, Ceja, Fenera, Levan, Levanić, Pomerski školjić, Premanturski školjić, Šekovac, Trumbuja; okolni otočići otoka Cresa: Kormati, Mali Ćutin, Mali Plavnik, Veli Ćutin, Visoki, Zeča; okolni otočići otoka Krka: Galun, Košljun, Plavnik, Prvić, Sv. Marko, Školjić, Zečevo; okolni otočići otoka Lošinja: Karbarus, Koludarc, Kozjak, Male Orjule, Mali Osir, Mišnjak, Murtar, Oruda, Palacol, Samuncel, Sv. Petar, Trasorka, Vele Srakane, Male Srakane, Vele Orjule, Veli Osir, Zabodaski; otočići u Vinodolskom i Velebitskom kanalu te Novigradskom i Karinskom moru: Lisac, Mali Ražanac, Mišjak, Sv. Anton, Sv.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Islands
    - List of islands CI Name on the map 1:25000 Name on nautic map Location Latitude Longitude IOTA Note 1 Aba D. Aba V. nr. Kornat 43° 51' 55,6'' N 15° 12' 48,9'' E EU-170 2 Arkanđel Arkanđel nr. Drvenik Mali 43° 28' 20,5'' N 16° 01' 41,0'' E EU-016 3 Arta M. Arta M. nr. Murter 43° 51' 12,2'' N 15° 33' 41,2'' E EU-170 4 Arta V. Arta V. nr. Murter 43° 51' 21,0'' N 15° 32' 40,1'' E EU-170 5 Babac Babac nr. Pašman 43° 57' 21,6'' N 15° 24' 11,6'' E EU-170 6 Badija Badija nr. Korčula 42° 57' 14,3'' N 17° 09' 39,4'' E EU-016 7 Biševo Biševo nr. Vis 42° 58' 44,0'' N 16° 01' 00,0'' E EU-016 8 Bodulaš Bodulaš Medulin gulf 44° 47' 28,1'' N 13° 56' 53,8'' E Not 9 Borovnik Borovnik nr. Kornat 43° 48' 39,7'' N 15° 15' 12,8'' E EU-170 10 O. Brač Brač 43° 20' 00,0'' N 16° 40' 00,0'' E EU-016 11 Ceja Ceja Medulin gulf 44° 47' 05,6'' N 13° 56' 00,0'' E Not 12 O. Cres Cres 44° 51' 21,4'' N 14° 24' 29,6'' E EU-136 13 O. Čiovo Čiovo nr. Split 43° 30' 00,0'' N 16° 18' 00,0'' E Not 14 Dolfin Dolfin nr. Pag 44° 41' 29,6'' N 14° 41' 28,1'' E EU-170 15 Dolin Dolin nr.
    [Show full text]
  • Planner Central-North Dalmatia Bases: Zadar/Sukosan Route 8 (1 Week)
    Planner Central-North Dalmatia bases: Zadar/Sukosan route 8 (1 week) RAB Mali Losinj ILOVIK PAG SILBA OLIB PREMUDA Smokvica IST MOLAT Veli Rat Pantera Zadar Sakarun Bozova Sutomiscica UGLJAN Sukosan DUGI OTOK PASMAN Biograd Sali ZUT VRGADA Pirovac Murter day: destination from: to: 1 Saturday base UGLJAN Sutomiscica or Kukljica PASMAN Ždrelac or Zadar 2 Sunday UGLJAN Sutomiscica or MOLAT Brgulje Bojenfeld Kukljica PASMAN Ždre- lac or Zadar 3 Monday MOLAT SILBA 4 Tuesday SILBA PREMUDA 5 Wednesday PREMUDA IST Ist 6 Thursday IST Ist DUGI OTKOK Bozova 7 Friday DUGI OTKOK Bozova Zadar or Sukosan Page 1 Location descriptions Zadar Zadar in the heart of Dalmatia is one of the most popular Croatian holiday desti- nations and one of the most beautiful port cities in Croatia. With its historic flair the 3000-year-old city combines modernity and history perfectly. Remnants of antiquity, historic villas and churches, attractive squares with restaurants, cafes and lively bars with nightlife make Zadar a vibrant city. Sukosan About 9 km southeast of Zadar lies the Marina Sukosan, with 1400 berths one of the largest marinas on the Adriatic. The picturesque little town is very popular because of its proximity to Zadar and its beautiful pebble beaches. UGLJAN Sutomiscica, Kukljica Ugljan is also called the green island. Slightly hilly, it stretches two nautical miles west of Zadar. With its many bays and the small Marina Kukljica Ugljan is a good stopover on every trip. Page 2 MOLAT On the island of Molat there are three small towns: Molat, Brgulje and Zapuntel. A nice place for over night for sailors is the buoys field in front of the village of Brgulje.
    [Show full text]
  • Pag Ugljan Pašman Dugi Otok Iž & Rava Silba, Olib
    FORTICA - PAG PAŠMAN Oasis of peace and quiet, connected by bridge with the island of Ugljan and by ferryboat with Biograd na Moru on the mainland. An island of farmhands who later turned to the sea and fishing preserving its tu- multuous history in the Benedictine monastery on the hill of Čokovac near Tkon and the Franciscan monastery near Kraj. These will fascinate nature and culture lovers. The trails are a unique experience for walking and cycling in mountain bike and leading to the highest peak of the island on Bokolj where the view extends from the peaks of Mount Vel- ebit to the hundreds of islands and islets and the Channel from Zadar to the Kornati islands. The Pašman Channel is a natural phenomenon with its green islands, ideal area for sailing and other nautical activi- ties. The southern part of the island, accessible by narrow roads and rustic houses, today partly intended for tourism, will bring you closer to Robinson tourism and the entire island will give you pleasure with its beaches. Sailing by the islands, islets and reefs in one of the most indented wa- ters of Europe is the trademark of this region. The marvellous channel with its pleasant mistral wind, gentle coves, outlines of fortifications and churches in the sunset, green islands covered with Mediterranean macchia, pine and olive trees encircled by a crystal sea inspire with Sailing beauty and offer safety. A dozen marinas and moorings, anchorage in attractive coves, charter fleets and experiences skippers are at disposal to all those who wish to try.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastline Lengths and Areas of Islands in the Croatian Part of the Adriatic Sea Determined from the Topographic Maps at the Scale of 1 : 25 000
    Geoadria Vol. 9 No. 1 5-32 Zadar, 2004. COASTLINE LENGTHS AND AREAS OF ISLANDS IN THE CROATIAN PART OF THE ADRIATIC SEA DETERMINED FROM THE TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS AT THE SCALE OF 1 : 25 000 TEA DUPLANČIĆ LEDER1 UDC: 911.3:32](497.5)(210.7) TIN UJEVIĆ2 Original scientific paper MENDI ČALA1 Izvorni znanstveni članak 1Hydrographic Institute of the Republic of Croatia Hrvatski hidrografski institut 2InfoKARTA, Mažuranićevo šetalište 14, Split Primljeno: 2004-05-09 Received: In this paper, modern definition of island established by the IHO has been accepted, and classification of islands, islets, rocks and rocks awash has been proposed according to their areas. The coastline of the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea was digitized from topographic maps produced at the scale of 1 : 25 000 (TM 25). Topographic maps used for digitization are more precise than the maps that were used in earlier works and consequently the data on the number of islands and their coastline lengths and areas are more precise. Polygons of islands were closed in GIS package AutoCAD Map 2000, and each was given its name. From the obtained database and classification of islands, islets and rocks, in the coastal sea area of the Republic of Croatia 79 islands, 525 islets, and 642 rocks and rocks awash, or a total of 1246 have been recorded. Furthermore, it has been established that on TM 25 the island of Cres has the largest area (405.70 km2), although in literature so far (including atlases) the island of Krk was most often cited as the largest island in the Adriatic Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Opacic.Indd
    HRVATSKI GEOGRAFSKI GLASNIK 71/1, 33 – 66 (2009.) UDK 911.3:728.71](497.57/.58) Original Scientifi c Paper Izvorni znanstveni članak Recent Characteristics of the Second Home Phenomenon in the Croatian Littoral Vuk Tvrtko Opačić The study analyses the characteristics of developmental dynamics and spatial distribution of the second home phenomenon in the Croatian littoral, the leading receiving second home area in the country, after the Second World War, with particular emphasis on the recent period (after the Homeland War and Croatian liberation). The period of the conversion and adaptation of the existing and abandoned housing stock into recreational second homes (mostly in 1960s and 1970s) and the period of the construction of the purpose-built dwellings for vacation and recreation, i.e. family weekend-houses (in 1970s and 1980s), was followed by the period of a more intensive construction of multi-apartment recreational buildings (from mid 1990s until the present time). The second home phenomenon fi rst spread in the area of the Northern Croatian Littoral. Then, between 1980 and 1990, it made signifi cant inroads also into Dalmatia. After the Homeland War and in the last ten years, it again became more prominent in the Kvarner and Istria. The geographical distribution of dwellings for vacation and recreation in 2001, covering the period between the two censuses of 1991 and 2001, reveals the persistence of earlier trends towards greater concentration of second homes in the leading tourist regions along the Croatian littoral, but also the increased dispersion into the regions which do not have as high value for tourism but are suitable for accommodating second home dwellings.
    [Show full text]