Appendix 1: Chronology of German- Focused Events, 1939–1941

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix 1: Chronology of German- Focused Events, 1939–1941 Appendix 1: Chronology of German- focused Events, 1939–1941 ‘FH’ in the following text refers to the diary entries of General Franz Halder, Chief of the General Staff, Army High Command (OKH), from August 1938 to September 1942, responsible for directing a force in June 1941 of 5 million officers and men. It is striking that as British anxiety about Operation Sea Lion, the invasion of Britain, grew in September, German commanders including Halder were increasingly focusing on planning for Operation Barbarossa, the invasion of Russia (from Halder, [1962–4] (1988), The Halder War Diary 1939–1942, pp. 155–310). ‘AB’ in the following entries (italicised) refers to Field Marshal Lord Alanbrooke, Commander-in-Chief British Home Forces, from 19 July 1940, and Chief of the Imperial General Staff (CIGS) from December 1941. It is evident that despite a range of intelligence suggesting Operation Sea Lion was winding down, Alanbrooke remained anxious about the threat into 1941 (from Alanbrooke, 2002, War Diaries 1939–1945: Field Marshal Lord Alanbrooke, pp. 90–132). 23 August 1939 The Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact was signed. 1 September Hitler invaded Poland. 17 September Stalin invaded Poland. 15 October German naval study set out the argument for an economic war against Britain, principally by sea blockade and siege; this was formalised in Hitler’s War Directive No. 9. 15 November Admiral Raeder directed his staff to examine the prospects for an invasion of Britain, this being the earliest recorded date of consideration given to the issue. 1 December General Jodl, Chief of German Army Operations, asked for an Army response to the German Navy’s paper on the prospects for an invasion of Britain; Goering, head of the Luftwaffe, similarly directed that a staff officer respond to the Army paper, but also confirmed his doubts about the feasibility of a landing; the Navy and Army papers became linked as Studie Nordwest. 9 April 1940 Hitler invaded Norway and Denmark. 10 May Hitler launched his Blitzkrieg on France and the Low Countries. 21 May Private discussion between Hitler and Admiral Raeder about the prospects for an invasion of Britain at a ‘future time’, and the Army’s likely requirements for the transport of its landing divisions. 24 May Hitler’s subsequently disputed ‘Halt Order’ stopped his tanks from crushing the encircled British Expeditionary Force at Dunkirk. 27 May Dunkirk evacuation began, air cover provided by home-based fighter squadrons including Spitfires; German naval review of 229 230 Appendix 1 Studie Nordwest, and a new Studie England undertaken that consid- ered the question of invasion, the latter influenced by the former assessment in terms of feasibility – command of the air over inva- sion beaches identified as essential at this early stage. 2 June During a visit to Army Group A HQ, Hitler told Field-Marshal von Rundstedt of his interest in attacking Russia now that Britain might be ready for peace. 3 June British completion of Dunkirk evacuation. 4 June Small exploratory Luftwaffe raids tested the RAF defences. 15 June [FH] A Fuehrer directive confirmed plans to reduce army ground forces to 120 divisions as their role has been fulfilled with the fall of France: army and navy continuing the war. 18 June Growing Luftwaffe attacks against Britain. [FH] Noted that in the event of a Soviet counter-attack during the German invasion, everything should be used to blunt this. 22 June France signed the Armistice. German historian Karl Klee gives the period from the end of the fight- ing in France to 7 August, as the initial contact phase of the Battle of Britain, comprising Luftwaffe fighter sweeps against England. [FH] Conference with senior officers discussed army regrouping requirements including coastal defence, and a consideration as to whether Britain would carry on fighting. 25 June Albert Speer noted on this date that Hitler was talking about his plans for an attack on Russia. 26 June Transfer of the 18th Army ordered, to reinforce the defences to the east, most of its 15 divisions in place by the end of July. In tandem with this instruction Halder also discussed with 18th Army’s com- mander, and its Chief-of-Staff, Major-General Marcks, ‘Deployment Instructions for Eighteenth Army’. In substance this represented the first plan for a Soviet invasion (which in fact therefore existed before 26 June 1940). 30 June First evidence of official OKH thinking on the prospects for inva- sion of Britain; Jodl discussed the issues with Hitler. [FH] Hitler reported as noting in his conference that Britain needed one final blow before she gave in, so that German attention could shift to the east. 1 July [FH] Conference with Schniewind, Naval Operations Staff, about basis of warfare against England identified air superiority, smooth water, fog from mid-October, jump-off bases, and transport for 100,000 men in one wave, Luftwaffe as airborne artillery and beach defences as key considerations. Von Leeb, Ordnance Office noted that ‘[H]e was told all along that invasion of England was not being considered’. 2 July [AB] Very anxious about an invasion threat and lack of British preparedness. Appendix 1 231 3 July French Fleet disabled by the Royal Navy at Mers-El-Kebir, Oran; German Army conference headed by Halder discussed details for a possible invasion of Britain; also on this date, Halder issued instructions to the OKH Chief of Operations to consider opera- tional issues arising from an invasion of Russia. [FH] Britain and the east are the focus now he notes. Discussion with General Von Greiffenberg-Buhle about operations against England: weather and air superiority the key factors. 4 July [FH] Discussion with General Stapf about air plans for the destruc- tion of the RAF and its supporting installations, with a secondary objective the enemy fleet; discussion considers RAF’s effective early- warning system, and the Luftwaffe’s current strength and tactics. 5 July [FH] Under the heading ‘England’, five points considered with Stapf and Buhle including locations for seaborne and airborne landing jump-off points, airborne unit availability and nature, getting armour across the Channel, and amphibious tanks. 11 July [FH] Discussion with Stapf considered ‘Invasion of England’ including airborne troops, transport planes, cargo gliders, and that the British bomber force has parity with the Luftwaffe. The RAF policy of moving bombers to and from dispersal areas makes it hard to destroy them he records. Fourteen to twenty-eight days needed to smash the RAF. Discussion with Von Greiffenberg-Buhle focused on map-planning for the invasion of Britain, and German force dispositions. 12 July Jodl completed his Löwe study for OKW concerning the invasion plan for Britain; this substantially informed the content of Hitler’s War Directive No. 16. [AB] Notes that invasion was threatened to be on this day. 13 July Hitler sanctioned the Army plan for Sea Lion. [FH] Report to Fuehrer on invasion of Britain noted that a range of technical issues are considered: British army strength, disposition, tactics; German invasion planning and preparations; time sched- ules. [FH] Confirms that orders issued for invasion planning; and Hitler puzzled by Britain’s refusal to give in. [AB] No signs of an attack as yet. 16 July Hitler’s War Directive No. 16, the invasion of England, set out qual- ifying conditions with preparations to begin 15 August; German planning ongoing, but scepticism from the Navy and Luftwaffe. Oberst Josef ‘Beppo’ Schmid delivered his intelligence assess- ment of the RAF, seriously under-estimating Fighter Command’s capability. 19 July Hitler’s ‘appeal to reason’ speech made to the Reichstag, offering to reach a peaceful end to the war with Britain – quickly rejected by the BBC. [FH] ‘Directive No. 16 has come in.’ Remainder of entry enumerates eight points discussed in conference with ObdH concerning invasion plans. 232 Appendix 1 [Field Marshal Alanbrooke appointed C-in-C of British Home Forces.] 21 July At the Fuehrer conference a Russian invasion was discussed, with an initial assessment offered to Hitler on timescale, requisite divi- sions and objectives. Field Marshal von Brauchitsch (Commander- in-Chief of the Army) directed to begin planning for the Soviet invasion. 22 July OKH furnished Hitler with a preliminary survey on the prospects for invading Russia. [FH] Hitler had noted that Britain was relying upon American aid and Russian support in order to keep fight- ing. Conference discussion about the invasion of Britain notes Hitler’s view that a Channel crossing would be hazardous, and a last resort. The twenty-fifth of August noted as possible invasion date, depending on report from Raeder. Conference then turned to planning for Russian invasion. 26 July [FH] Meeting to review intelligence relating to a Russian opera- tion; then, meeting to discuss technical issues concerning invasion vessels, barges, means of propulsion, dealing with tides and horses. 28 July Hitler gave General Fromm orders for the reorganisation of the German armaments programme, the army to be increased to a total of 180 divisions by the following spring. [FH] Noted that Naval Operations Staff memo about landing points and crossing times had upset invasion planning, the previous plans wholly unworkable. 29 July Following the 21 July conference Halder consulted with OKH officers, and Marcks began a special staff study for the invasion of Russia. Jodl confirmed Hitler’s decision to invade Russia to mili- tary planners working under Colonel Warlimont – the planners were told that Sea Lion preparations were to continue, in addition to work on attacking Russia. [FH] Detailed invasion discussions following naval memo. 30 July [FH] Notes earliest invasion jump-off date is 20–6 September based on navy estimate; Luftwaffe is not focusing on operations to sup- port a landing; Royal Navy cannot be prevented from attacking invasion fleet; value of aircraft against naval craft is exaggerated; serious doubts noted about likelihood of launching invasion because of naval shortcomings.
Recommended publications
  • Heroes of the Reich
    HEROES OF THE REICH ADOLF HITLER The Only Democratically Elected Leader of World War Two PUBLISHING REAL HISTORY Mike Walsh BIOGRAPHY MIKE WALSH Mike Walsh is a veteran journalist, broadcaster and historian. A fugitive from renegade Europeans, leftists, palace journalists, he has shrugged off their wrath over 50 years of writing. His Irish-American father, Patrick had fought in four conflicts by the time he reached 40-years of age: The Irish peoples guerrilla war against the British Army‟s Black and Tans. These armed irregulars, dredged from England‟s prisons, were notorious for their viciousness. The Irish War of Independence and on to fight in the most ferocious hand-to-hand battles during the Spanish Civil War. Whilst on the frontlines he was a close associate of American war correspondent, Ernest Hemingway. Mike‟s father formed an enduring friendship with Ireland‟s celebrated playwright, Sean O‟Casey. Eventually his father served in the Royal Air Force during World War Two as an aircraft fitter / flier. Kathleen, Mike‟s well- educated mother also mentored his writing skills. A former novice nun she was a corresponding friend of Spain's Civil War revolutionary La Pasionaria. From the age of 26 the world-travelling Mike was consumed by a passion for truth and justice. Inevitably, this led him to the potpourri of lies, infamies, cover-ups and crimes committed by the Allies that militarily defeated the Workers Reich. By doing so they ensured the spread of Bolshevism, denial of freedom to nearly a score of Central European nations, the dismembering of the British Empire, and surrender to American imperialism.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Air Force Historical Society Journal 29
    ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY JOURNAL 29 2 The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors concerned and are not necessarily those held by the Royal Air Force Historical Society. Copyright 2003: Royal Air Force Historical Society First published in the UK in 2003 by the Royal Air Force Historical Society All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Publisher in writing. ISSN 1361-4231 Typeset by Creative Associates 115 Magdalen Road Oxford OX4 1RS Printed by Advance Book Printing Unit 9 Northmoor Park Church Road Northmoor OX29 5UH 3 CONTENTS BATTLE OF BRITAIN DAY. Address by Dr Alfred Price at the 5 AGM held on 12th June 2002 WHAT WAS THE IMPACT OF THE LUFTWAFFE’S ‘TIP 24 AND RUN’ BOMBING ATTACKS, MARCH 1942-JUNE 1943? A winning British Two Air Forces Award paper by Sqn Ldr Chris Goss SUMMARY OF THE MINUTES OF THE SIXTEENTH 52 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING HELD IN THE ROYAL AIR FORCE CLUB ON 12th JUNE 2002 ON THE GROUND BUT ON THE AIR by Charles Mitchell 55 ST-OMER APPEAL UPDATE by Air Cdre Peter Dye 59 LIFE IN THE SHADOWS by Sqn Ldr Stanley Booker 62 THE MUNICIPAL LIAISON SCHEME by Wg Cdr C G Jefford 76 BOOK REVIEWS. 80 4 ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY President Marshal of the Royal Air Force Sir Michael Beetham GCB CBE DFC AFC Vice-President Air Marshal Sir Frederick Sowrey KCB CBE AFC Committee Chairman Air Vice-Marshal
    [Show full text]
  • How the Luftwaffe Lost the Battle of Britain British Courage and Capability Might Not Have Been Enough to Win; German Mistakes Were Also Key
    How the Luftwaffe Lost the Battle of Britain British courage and capability might not have been enough to win; German mistakes were also key. By John T. Correll n July 1940, the situation looked “We shall fight on the beaches, we shall can do more than delay the result.” Gen. dire for Great Britain. It had taken fight on the landing grounds, we shall Maxime Weygand, commander in chief Germany less than two months to fight in the fields and in the streets, we of French military forces until France’s invade and conquer most of Western shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender, predicted, “In three weeks, IEurope. The fast-moving German Army, surrender.” England will have her neck wrung like supported by panzers and Stuka dive Not everyone agreed with Churchill. a chicken.” bombers, overwhelmed the Netherlands Appeasement and defeatism were rife in Thus it was that the events of July 10 and Belgium in a matter of days. France, the British Foreign Office. The Foreign through Oct. 31—known to history as the which had 114 divisions and outnumbered Secretary, Lord Halifax, believed that Battle of Britain—came as a surprise to the Germany in tanks and artillery, held out a Britain had lost already. To Churchill’s prophets of doom. Britain won. The RAF little longer but surrendered on June 22. fury, the undersecretary of state for for- proved to be a better combat force than Britain was fortunate to have extracted its eign affairs, Richard A. “Rab” Butler, told the Luftwaffe in almost every respect.
    [Show full text]
  • Inscribed 6 (2).Pdf
    Inscribed6 CONTENTS 1 1. AVIATION 33 2. MILITARY 59 3. NAVAL 67 4. ROYALTY, POLITICIANS, AND OTHER PUBLIC FIGURES 180 5. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 195 6. HIGH LATITUDES, INCLUDING THE POLES 206 7. MOUNTAINEERING 211 8. SPACE EXPLORATION 214 9. GENERAL TRAVEL SECTION 1. AVIATION including books from the libraries of Douglas Bader and “Laddie” Lucas. 1. [AITKEN (Group Captain Sir Max)]. LARIOS (Captain José, Duke of Lerma). Combat over Spain. Memoirs of a Nationalist Fighter Pilot 1936–1939. Portrait frontispiece, illustrations. First edition. 8vo., cloth, pictorial dust jacket. London, Neville Spearman. nd (1966). £80 A presentation copy, inscribed on the half title page ‘To Group Captain Sir Max AitkenDFC. DSO. Let us pray that the high ideals we fought for, with such fervent enthusiasm and sacrifice, may never be allowed to perish or be forgotten. With my warmest regards. Pepito Lerma. May 1968’. From the dust jacket: ‘“Combat over Spain” is one of the few first-hand accounts of the Spanish Civil War, and is the only one published in England to be written from the Nationalist point of view’. Lerma was a bomber and fighter pilot for the duration of the war, flying 278 missions. Aitken, the son of Lord Beaverbrook, joined the RAFVR in 1935, and flew Blenheims and Hurricanes, shooting down 14 enemy aircraft. Dust jacket just creased at the head and tail of the spine. A formidable Vic formation – Bader, Deere, Malan. 2. [BADER (Group Captain Douglas)]. DEERE (Group Captain Alan C.) DOWDING Air Chief Marshal, Lord), foreword. Nine Lives. Portrait frontispiece, illustrations. First edition.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Sebag-Montefiore, Hugh, Dunkirk: Fight to the Last Man James V
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Economics Faculty Publications Department of Economics 5-2009 Review of Sebag-Montefiore, Hugh, Dunkirk: Fight to the Last Man James V. Koch Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/economics_facpubs Part of the European History Commons, and the Nonfiction Commons Repository Citation Koch, James V., "Review of Sebag-Montefiore, Hugh, Dunkirk: Fight to the Last Man" (2009). Economics Faculty Publications. 14. https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/economics_facpubs/14 Original Publication Citation Koch, J. V. (2009). Review of Sebag-Montefiore, Hugh, Dunkirk: Fight to the Last Man. H-Net Reviews, 1-3. This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Economics at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Economics Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. H-Net Revie in the Humanities & Social Hugh Sebag-Montefiore. Dunkirk: Fight to the Last Man. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2006. xvii + 701 pp. $35.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-674-02439-7. Reviewed by James V. Koch (Old Dominion University) Published on H-German (May, 2009) Commissioned by Susan R. Boettcher Definitely a Fight, But Not to the Last Man Hugh Sebag-Montefiore correctly notes that multi- Sebag-Montefiore traces how the 338,226 individu- tudes of books already have been written about the evac- als were evacuated from Dunkirk between May 26 and uation of the British and French troops from Dunkirk in June 4, 1940. British ships rescued more than 200,000 ad- May and June 1940.
    [Show full text]
  • The Channel Dash April 26
    The Channel Dash April 26 On the night of February 11, 1942, two German battleships, the Scharnhorst and the Gneisenau, along with the heavy cruiser Prinz Eugen left anchor at Brest, France. This was be the beginning of the “Channel Dash” (Operation Thunderbolt-Cerberus) of February The Prinz Eugen 11-13 in which these three ships, despite pursuit by the British Royal Navy and Air Force (RAF), returned intact to Germany via the English Channel. The Dash was ordered by German leader Adolf Hitler—against the advice of his admirals, who believed his plan meant certain destruction for these ships. Yet Hitler expressed the following opinion: “The ships must leave port in daytime as we are dependent on the element of surprise…I don’t think the British capable of making and carrying out lightning decisions.” This time, Hitler was correct. How did the German ships end up in Brest, France? And why was it necessary for them to even make a Channel dash? Germany and Great Britain had been at war since 1939. By the summer of 1940, the seemingly unstoppable Germans had overrun much of the western portion of continental Europe. This included part of France, allowing them use of the port of Brest on the lower end of the English Channel for their surface ships and submarines. The Royal Navy attempted to blockade the Atlantic coast ports, but its resources were stretched thin. The British had been watching German vessels at Brest carefully. In fact, these three ships had been undergoing repairs there for much of 1941.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Command in the Second World War
    AIR POWER REVIEW VOL 21 NO 1 COASTAL COMMAND IN THE SECOND WORLD WAR By Professor John Buckley Biography: John Buckley is Professor of Military History at the University of Wolverhampton, UK. His books include The RAF and Trade Defence 1919-1945 (1995), Air Power in the Age of Total War (1999) and Monty’s Men: The British Army 1944-5 (2013). His history of the RAF (co-authored with Paul Beaver) will be published by Oxford University Press in 2018. Abstract: From 1939 to 1945 RAF Coastal Command played a crucial role in maintaining Britain’s maritime communications, thus securing the United Kingdom’s ability to wage war against the Axis powers in Europe. Its primary role was in confronting the German U-boat menace, particularly in the 1940-41 period when Britain came closest to losing the Battle of the Atlantic and with it the war. The importance of air power in the war against the U-boat was amply demonstrated when the closing of the Mid-Atlantic Air Gap in 1943 by Coastal Command aircraft effectively brought victory in the Atlantic campaign. Coastal Command also played a vital role in combating the German surface navy and, in the later stages of the war, in attacking Germany’s maritime links with Scandinavia. Disclaimer: The views expressed are those of the authors concerned, not necessarily the MOD. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form without prior permission in writing from the Editor. 178 COASTAL COMMAND IN THE SECOND WORLD WAR introduction n March 2004, almost sixty years after the end of the Second World War, RAF ICoastal Command finally received its first national monument which was unveiled at Westminster Abbey as a tribute to the many casualties endured by the Command during the War.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal Association of Jewish Refugees
    VOLUME 7 NO.4 APRIL 2007 journal Association of Jewish Refugees Prisoners remembered, prisoners forgotten Researching my article on Herbert Sulzbach captives persisted down the decades. for our February issue, I was amazed at the This fascination does not extend to extent to which the history of German British PoWs in the First World War, about prisoners-of-war in Britain has fallen into whom very little is knovro. At most, a few oblivion. Today, nobody seems to know that people will have heard of the camp at there were some 400,000 German PoWs in Ruhleben, near Berlin, where British Britain in 1946, dispersed all over the civilians were interned. The presence of country in some 1,500 camp units. I even numerous British and French PoWs in discovered a mini-camp in Brondesbury Germany during the First World War also Park, London NW6, about two miles from vanished rapidly from German public where I live, where prisoners from Wilton consciousness, unlike that of Russian PoWs, Park in Buckinghamshire, selected to whose suffering is vividly depicted in such broadcast on the BBC, were lodged in bestsellers as Amold Zweig's Der Streit um London. Yet the record of the British in re­ den Sergeanten Grischa and E. M. educating the PoWs in their charge was Remarque's Im Westen nichts Neues. The thoroughly creditable. The official German fate of the Russian PoWs came to symbolise history of German PoWs in the Second the senseless suffering of the ordinary World War explicitly acknowledges that soldier in a hopeless war, which was the Britain surpassed all other custodian powers main lesson of the First World War for in teaching PoWs to respect democratic liberal intellectuals in post-1918 Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evacuation of the British Expeditionary Force from Dunkirk: Operation Dynamo 27 May to 4 June 1940 © 1990 GLJ Wortham
    The Evacuation of the British Expeditionary Force from Dunkirk: Operation Dynamo 27 May to 4 June 1940 © 1990 GLJ Wortham I have today, 12 May 1990, been reading an been taken over by the navy. It was reasonably article in The Times telling of the evacuation. close to my home in Brockley, so for the first Soon many of the craft used in that epic time since my call-up, I was able to get home operation will take part in a re-enactment, when I was off duty. sailing from Dover and Ramsgate to Dunkirk I made good use of the opportunities as they (I use the English spelling) and La Panne to presented themselves, for I had had no leave take part in the fiftieth anniversary since mobilisation and the indications were celebrations. there would be none for a long while. As a The fiftieth anniversary means I have youngster, even though I was an able seaman, advanced in age from 19 to 69 so it is it seemed I might not get any leave until appropriate to record my thoughts before my hostilities ceased and no petty officer or memory of the event fades, for I have to admit commissioned officer ever tried to convince I cannot recall detail as I would wish, which me otherwise! In fact they set out to impress itself is a good enough excuse for inaccuracies. us all that there was no entitlement to leave As a member of London Division of the Royal even if we were dying of exhaustion! Naval Volunteer Reserve (RNVR) based Ratings were drafted to a ship for a specific aboard HMS President alongside the voyage.
    [Show full text]
  • Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell
    Copyrights sought (Albert) Basil (Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell) Filson Young (Alexander) Forbes Hendry (Alexander) Frederick Whyte (Alfred Hubert) Roy Fedden (Alfred) Alistair Cooke (Alfred) Guy Garrod (Alfred) James Hawkey (Archibald) Berkeley Milne (Archibald) David Stirling (Archibald) Havergal Downes-Shaw (Arthur) Berriedale Keith (Arthur) Beverley Baxter (Arthur) Cecil Tyrrell Beck (Arthur) Clive Morrison-Bell (Arthur) Hugh (Elsdale) Molson (Arthur) Mervyn Stockwood (Arthur) Paul Boissier, Harrow Heraldry Committee & Harrow School (Arthur) Trevor Dawson (Arwyn) Lynn Ungoed-Thomas (Basil Arthur) John Peto (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin & New Statesman (Borlasse Elward) Wyndham Childs (Cecil Frederick) Nevil Macready (Cecil George) Graham Hayman (Charles Edward) Howard Vincent (Charles Henry) Collins Baker (Charles) Alexander Harris (Charles) Cyril Clarke (Charles) Edgar Wood (Charles) Edward Troup (Charles) Frederick (Howard) Gough (Charles) Michael Duff (Charles) Philip Fothergill (Charles) Philip Fothergill, Liberal National Organisation, N-E Warwickshire Liberal Association & Rt Hon Charles Albert McCurdy (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett & World Review of Reviews (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Colin) Mark Patrick (Crwfurd) Wilfrid Griffin Eady (Cyril) Berkeley Ormerod (Cyril) Desmond Keeling (Cyril) George Toogood (Cyril) Kenneth Bird (David) Euan Wallace (Davies) Evan Bedford (Denis Duncan)
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline - May 1940
    TIMELINE - MAY 1940 As the month begins the battle for Norway continues. Just to recap, German naval and ground forces had begun invading both Norway and Denmark on 9th April. Denmark had quickly capitulated but Norway had resisted. British forces were sent to Andalsnes on 18th April to 1st May, Namsos on 16th April to 3rd May, and Narvik from 15th April to 8th June. They were joined by Norwegian, French and Polish forces. But as May begins the evacuation of Allied troops from some of these areas is already underway and nearing completion. With the failure of the campaign for central Norway attention shifts to Narvik in the far north, strategically vital to the Germans for the shipping of iron ore from Sweden. 1 On 2nd May German troops reached Andalsnes, and on the following day Norwegian troops south of Trondheim surrendered to the Germans. The allied evacuation at Namsos was completed, but German aircraft located part of the evacuation fleet and sank the destroyers Afridi and Bison. The Bison was a French destroyer and she was the first to be sunk with the loss of 136 of her crew. The surviving crew were then picked up by the Afridi. But when that ship came under attack a further 35 of her crew were lost, along with 53 of the Afridi’s crew and 13 soldiers - the only casualties among the whole force of 12,000 troops evacuated from Åndalsnes and Namsos On 5th May the Battle of Hegra Fortress ended when the fortress capitulated. The Germans had now achieved complete victory on Norway’s southern front.
    [Show full text]
  • VENTE AUX Enchères WAVRE 2 Décembre 2012 2 D É CEMBRE 2012 ENCH È RES WAVRE VENTE AUX Militaria WWII USA, Grande-Bretagne, Allemagne Et Divers
    VENTE AUX ENCHÈRES WAVRE 2 DÉCEMBRE 2012 CEMBRE 2012 É 2 D WAVRE RES È VENTE AUX ENCH VENTE AUX Militaria WWII USA, Grande-Bretagne, Allemagne et Divers Dimanche 2 décembre 2012 à 14:00 1 La vente se tiendra le dimanche 2 décembre à 14:00 à l’occasion de la bourse mensuelle de Wavre à l’adresse suivante : HALL MANIFAGRI Avenue Solvay, 5 Zoning Industriel Nord B-1300 Wavre Belgique Autoroute A4-E411 – Bruxelles – Namur - Sortie 5 – Rizensart/Bierges Puis N257 vers Rosières/Wavre Nord (25 km au sud-est de Bruxelles) Photographies : DeclicPhoto. Blois - Joël David Conception/réalisation : Régi’aRM - UNIFORMES -JPEX TEAM 2 Militaria WWII USA, Grande-Bretagne, Allemagne et Divers Dimanche 2 décembre 2012 à 14:00 HALL MANIFAGRI Avenue Solvay, 5 Zoning Industriel Nord B-1300 Wavre Belgique Expositions Publiques le vendredi 30 novembre de 10:00 à 18:00 Le samedi 1er décembre de 8:00 à 18:00 Le dimanche 2 décembre de 10:00 à 12:00 Catalogue visible sur internet : www.militariauctions.com Contact Emilie Weyl : +33 (0)628453567 [email protected] Antwerp Berchem Station, Uitbreidingstraat 84/3, 2600 Berchem, Belgique, Tél. +32 (0)3 218 22 83 3 Antwerp Berchem Station, Uitbreidingstraat 84/3, 2600 Berchem, Belgique, Tél. +32 (0)3 218 22 83 ORDRE D’ACHAT /ABSENTEE BID FORM NOM/NAME PRÉNOM/FIRST NAME ADRESSE/ADDRESS TÉLÉPHONE/PHONE BUREAU/OFFICE DOMICILE/HOME FAX Je déclare avoir pris connaissance et accepté les conditions du catalogue et vous prie de vous porter acquéreur pour mon compte, les lots ci-dessous désignés aux prix suivants ne comprenant pas les frais légaux.
    [Show full text]