DOCSLIB.ORG

Outline of Opening Presentation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Outline of Opening Presentation PART B SUBMISSION – RAIL PROJECTS VICTORIA OUTLINE OF OPENING PRESENTATION Introduction 1 This outline has been prepared in respect of RPV’s opening presentation to the Advisory Committee. 2 It should be read in conjunction with RPV’s Part A Submission1 and adopts the defined terminology contained therein. RPV and its Role in Delivering the Project 3 RPV is an administrative office within the Department of Transport. 4 It is responsible for obtaining the applicable statutory approvals for the full Project and for the delivery of Stage 1. Arrangements for the delivery of Stage 2 are subject to Government decision-making. Upon the completion of the construction and commissioning of Stage 1, V/Line will become responsible for the ongoing operation and maintenance of the train services and infrastructure delivered by Stage 1. The Structure of RPV’s Case 5 It is the task of RPV to assist the Advisory Committee in preparing a report in response to its Terms of Reference and to provide such information as required. To this end the Advisory Committee has a substantial amount of information before it, including the Greater Geelong Planning Scheme, the exhibited material, and the material produced for the hearing. The Advisory Committee has also conducted an accompanied inspection of the subject land and the Maddingly facility as a useful comparison for Stage 1. It is not intended that all of this background will be reproduced or dealt with exhaustively for the opening presentation. 6 Rather, it is to be noted that RPV’s case before the Advisory Committee comprises the following parts: 1 Filed in accordance with the Advisory Committee’s directions on 28 January 2020. (a) The exhibited PSA and accompanying technical reports; (b) The Part A Submission filed on 28 January 2020, along with: (i) the Project Outline and Rationale memorandum (Annexure A); (ii) the ‘Day 1’ working draft of the Incorporated Document (Annexure B); (iii) the tabular response to submissions prepared by RPV in respect of the Amendment (Annexure C); (iv) the draft Noise Management Plan prepared in respect of the Project (Annexure D); and (v) the Site Investigation Summary Report (as filed in advance of the hearing); (c) The expert evidence filed by RPV with the Advisory Committee; (d) This opening presentation (Part B Submission) along with: (i) an updated working draft of the Incorporated Document and NMP (‘Day 2’ versions); and (e) RPV’s Reply which will be made at the conclusion of the hearing, the form and content of which will depend on the submissions and material produced by others during the hearing. 7 RPV will continue to update the proposed planning control in response to matters raised in submissions and in evidence. RPV is also willing to consider timely suggestions from other submitters in case they are supportable, or alternatively, require a specific response in reply. RPV anticipates consolidating further revisions in a third working draft of the proposed control to be tabled at the conclusion of the hearing. The Project 8 A description of the Project is contained in paragraphs [18] – [28] of RPV’s Part A Submission. A description of the Project in the context of the needs of the Regional Rail Network will be provided by Mr McKeown. 9 For present purposes it is pertinent to note that: (a) Stage 1 is designed to meet the immediate needs of the network in providing additional stabling capacity to the Geelong Line. It is anticipated that it will be delivered in the short term (by 2022) and that it will be comparable in scale and operation to the facility visited by the Advisory Committee on Day 1 of the hearing at Maddingly. (b) Stage 2 will introduce maintenance capacity to the Geelong Line as well as a substantial further increase in stabling capacity. It will complement (but is not dependent upon) the duplication of the Geelong Line between Geelong and Waurn Ponds and is broadly comparable in operation (if not in scale) to the stabling and maintenance facility operated by Metro Trains in Pakenham. The timing for the delivery of Stage 2 has not been determined and will be subject to further Government decision-making. (c) A distinction is drawn in the proposed planning controls between the Project Land2 and the Wider Project Land.3 Whereas the Project Land will accommodate the physical infrastructure that is directly associated with the Project, the Wider Project Land is designed to accommodate infrastructure that is incidental to the Project (principally in the nature of signage and signals). (d) The proposed planning control does not incorporate or refer to the concept design. This is appropriate in this case as the role of the concept design is to inform the preparation of the amendment and, in particular, the land area and mapping requirements of the amendment. The concept design is obviously not prepared to include the design and development detail that will accompany statutory approval. However, in combination with the exhibited material and expert assessments, the concept design provides a sound basis for assumptions to be made and, critically, to show how the facility will meet network need. The utilisation of a concept design is appropriate in this instance given the nature of the facility, the general uniformity of rail infrastructure assets, the operational and functional constraints that necessarily inform the design and operation of stabling and maintenance facilities, the conservative nature of the impact assessments, and the safeguards that are incorporated within the PSA. 2 Meaning the land required to accommodate the Facility, being the land 350 metres south of the rail corridor between Pettavel Road and Bogans Lane on the property situated at 255 Reservoir Road, Waurn Ponds. 3 Meaning all of the land required for the delivery of ancillary infrastructure and associated construction activity. Overarching Propositions 10 An overview of RPV’s position is contained in paragraphs [6] – [17] of its Part A Submission. 11 The following overarching propositions are noted for present purposes: Societal Need 12 In this presentation RPV describes the importance of both stages of the proposal to support the function and development of the Regional Rail Network in the short term and to support future generations. It is properly characterised as a component of a broader infrastructure, critical to the social and economic health of the State, and to meeting public need. 13 The societal need for a project is a touchstone in many planning decisions. It is recognised, in this respect, that: The concept of net community benefit is a manifestation of the traditional test of ‘need against detriment’ which has been consistently applied for many years. In broad terms, the proposition is that the absence of need does not justify the refusal of a permit, however, the presence of need may well justify the grant of a permit.’4 14 It is trite but important to recognise that, whilst societal need is regularly identified as a factor supporting the grant of planning permission (be it in the form of a planning scheme amendment or planning permit), not all projects that advance societal needs do so to the same degree. 15 Indeed, as the Tribunal recognised in Tulcany v Knox City Council:5 Need is a fundamental concept in town planning, because town planning is essentially concerned with shaping our physical environment to meet the social economic and environmental needs of the community. However in individual development applications the role of need is complex. At one end of the scale, there are ubiquitous land uses in relation to which the Tribunal has said that need is not a matter for the planning system, rather it is a matter for the competitive market place. On the other hand there are important community based uses where the Tribunal has found that the need for the use can outweigh other important, and ordinarily 4 Cabrini Property Association v Stonnington City Council and Others [2000] VCAT 483 (29 January 2000) at [80]. See also Shell Company of Australia Pty Ltd and Ors v City of Frankston and Anor 8 APAD 127 at 135. 5 [2003] VCAT 1627 at [11] – [15]. decisive, planning considerations. An often quoted example of this latter case is the helipad at the Alfred Hospital. Nevertheless, there is a middle ground in which need may not be a decisive factor in the case of an individual development application, but will be a factor which influences the balances to be struck between competing planning policy consideration. An example of this is the retirement village permitted by the Tribunal in Cotham Road Pty Ltd v Boroondara City Council [2003] VCAT 795... 6 16 For the reasons outlined below, there can be little doubt that the Project sits at the very upper end of the spectrum of need identified in Tulcany. This must count heavily in favour of the Project and inform the manner in which the Advisory Committee assesses and balances the competing interests at issue in this amendment. The Project has State-wide Significance 17 That the Regional Rail Network constitutes critical infrastructure of state significance is beyond contention. It performs both passenger and freight functions, playing a pivotal role in facilitating the movement of people and goods throughout the State. Its efficient and effective operation is vital to the realisation of many of the core strategic planning objectives that apply within Regional Victoria. 18 As the Project Outline and Rationale memorandum demonstrates, the proposed facility will constitute an important component of that network.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • January 2021 Published by the Australian Timetable Association
    TABLE TALK AUSTRALASIAN TIMETABLE NEWS RRP $4.95 No. 341, January 2021 Published by the Australian Timetable Association RAIL & TRAM NEWS Mount Isa line On Wednesday, 30 December, an Aurizon freight train Service capacity tracker hauling fertiliser derailed east of Charters Towers on the Mount Isa line. A workforce of 50 personnel TransLink has released a “service capacity tracker” on worked to repair the line from 31 December to 5 their website (www.translink.com.au) in the form of a January. Despite the completion of repairs, heavy dashboard. After selecting a service from the prompts, rainfall has further delayed the return of both rail traffic. the dashboard provides a forecast of available space onboard the train, tram, bus or ferry service based on According to a report in local newspaper, The North “historical data and forecast changes in travel West Star, the cause was believed to be a very behaviour” for any of the next seven days. localised extreme weather event impacting the track infrastructure, although Queensland Rail has Limitations include that the dashboard provides data in confirmed that there has been no extreme weather 15-minute increments (i.e.: if there is more than one activity being registered on any official weather station bus within a 15-minute period, the data is averaged nearby. across those services), and no data is available for services between 23:00 and 05:00. One example is As of 8 January, the Inlander rail service continues to provided below (shows forecast capacity for 15 be replaced by road coaches, where conditions are December from Fortitide Valley station).
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 19 BP3 Service Delivery
    Victorian Budget 18/19 GETTING THINGS DONE Service Delivery Budget Paper No. 3 Presented by Tim Pallas MP, Treasurer of the State of Victoria The Secretary © State of Victoria 2018 Department of Treasury and Finance (Department of Treasury and Finance) 1 Treasury Place Melbourne, Victoria, 3002 Australia Tel: +61 3 9651 5111 Fax: +61 3 9651 2062 Website: budget.vic.gov.au You are free to re use this work under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence, provided you Authorised by the Victorian Government credit the State of Victoria (Department of Treasury 1 Treasury Place, Melbourne, 3002 and Finance) as author, indicate if changes were made and comply with the other licence terms. Printed by Doculink, Port Melbourne The licence does not apply to any branding, Printed on recycled paper including Government logos. This publication makes reference to the 2018 19 Copyright queries may be directed to Budget paper set which includes: [email protected]. Budget Paper No. 1 Treasurer’s Speech Budget Paper No. 2 Strategy and Outlook ISSN 2204 9185 (print) Budget Paper No. 3 Service Delivery ISSN 2204 9177 (online) Budget Paper No. 4 State Capital Program Published May 2018 Budget Paper No. 5 Statement of Finances (incorporating Quarterly Financial Report No. 3) Service Delivery 2018-19 Presented by Tim Pallas MP Treasurer of the State of Victoria for the information of Honourable Members Budget Paper No. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 – Output, asset investment, savings and revenue initiatives ....................... 1 Whole of Government – Aboriginal Affairs .................................................................... 3 Whole of Government – Child information Sharing Reforms .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Australasian Railway Association Skills Capabilty Study
    AUSTRALASIAN RAILWAY ASSOCIATION SKILLS CAPABILTY STUDY SKILLS CRISIS: A CALL TO ACTION NOVEMBER 2018 FOREWORD We are living through a renaissance of investment in rail. Projects such as Cross River Rail in Brisbane, Inland Rail, Sydney and Melbourne Metros, the Level Crossing Replacement Program, the Metronet project in Perth, rail extensions in South Australia, expansion of rail lines in the Pilbara, and numerous light rail projects in cities across the country, are heralding this renaissance. New Zealand too, is experiencing a deepening focus on rail. But this hasn’t always been the case. Rail investment stagnation, stop-start funding cycles and short term cost cutting have been a feature of the Australian rail sector since the 1980s. And one of the consequences has been the collapse in investment in training and skills development of the people to build our infrastructure and to operate and maintain first class rail services. This is a clear case of market failure. ARA commissioned this Report to undertake a workforce capability analysis based on planned and forecast rail infrastructure development in Australia and New Zealand over the next 10 years, with implications for a range of rail industry skills across construction, manufacturing, operations and maintenance. And to determine strategies to address them. The term supply and demand is well understood in the marketplace. However, as to rail skills in the current investment environment, it is a case of ‘demand and no supply.’ This is the crisis that this Report seeks to address. We welcome the massive investment in all aspects of rail now underway. This is crucial for our economic growth and improving amenity in our cities and regions.
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIAL Victoria Government Gazette
    Victoria Government Gazette No. S 258 Wednesday 26 June 2019 By Authority of Victorian Government Printer Transport Integration Act 2010 TRANSPORT RESTRUCTURING ORDER (ROADS CORPORATION) NO. 1/2019 Order in Council This Order may be cited as the Transport Restructuring Order (Roads Corporation) No. 1/2019. The Governor in Council under Division 2 of Part 4A of the Transport Integration Act 2010 orders that: 1. Commencement This Order comes into operation on 1 July 2019. 2. Definitions 2.1 In this Order – ‘conferred functions’ means the functions conferred on the Head, Transport for Victoria by paragraph 3 of this Order. 2.2 Terms used in this Order have the same meaning as that term has in the Transport Integration Act 2010, unless the context otherwise requires. 3. Conferred functions The functions specified in Part A of Schedule 1 are conferred on the Head, Transport for Victoria. 4. Ongoing and concurrent conferral 4.1 The conferred functions are conferred on the Head, Transport for Victoria on an ongoing basis. 4.2 The conferred functions are to be performed or exercised concurrently by the Head, Transport for Victoria and the Roads Corporation (meaning that each of the Head, Transport for Victoria and the Roads Corporation may exercise the functions independently of the other). 5. Effect of conferral on the Head, Transport for Victoria The conferred functions are conferred on the Head, Transport for Victoria only to the extent that the exercise or performance of the function does not require the exercise of a function, power or duty conferred exclusively on another person or body by or under another Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Suburban Rail Loop Stage One Project Outline
    Suburban Rail Loop Stage One Project Outline 10/11/2020 Table of Contents Executive Summary .......................................................... 3 1. Introduction ................................................................. 5 2. SRL ............................................................................... 5 2.1. Need for SRL ................................................................................ 6 2.2. Strategic Context .......................................................................... 8 3. Project Description ................................................... 10 3.1. Proposed Works ......................................................................... 10 3.2. Other Works ............................................................................... 14 3.3. Project Schedule and Delivery ................................................... 16 4. Relevant Legislation ................................................. 18 4.1. Commonwealth Legislation ........................................................ 18 4.2. State Approvals .......................................................................... 18 5. Preliminary Evaluation ............................................. 19 5.1. Summary of further investigations .............................................. 31 6. Community and Stakeholder Engagement ............. 33 6.1. Objectives and Principles ........................................................... 33 6.2. Stakeholder Identification and Engagement ............................... 34 6.3.
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIAL Victoria Government Gazette
    Victoria Government Gazette No. S 588 Thursday 27 December 2018 By Authority of Victorian Government Printer Transport (Compliance and Miscellaneous) Act 1983 CONDITIONS UNDER SECTION 220D I, Corey Hannett, Acting Head, Transport for Victoria, as delegate of the Secretary to the Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, pursuant to section 220D(1) of the Transport (Compliance and Miscellaneous) Act 1983, hereby determine the conditions contained in the Victorian Fares and Ticketing Manual (effective 1 January 2019) to which HQWLWOHPHQWVWRXVHWKHSXEOLFWUDQVSRUWVHUYLFHVVSHFL¿HGLQWKDWPDQXDODUHWREHVXEMHFW WKH January 2019 Conditions). The January 2019 Conditions take effect from and including 1 January 2019 and replace the conditions determined under section 220D(1) of the Transport (Compliance and Miscellaneous) Act 1983 contained in the Victorian Fares and Ticketing Manual (effective 1 January 2018), published in the Victoria Government Gazette No. S 457 dated Friday 22 December 2017, which are revoked on the January 2019 Conditions taking effect. Dated 18 December 2018 COREY HANNETT Acting Head, Transport for Victoria SPECIAL 2 S 588 27 December 2018 Victoria Government Gazette Transport (Compliance and Miscellaneous) Act 1983 VICTORIAN FARES AND TICKETING MANUAL (effective 1 January 2019) CHAPTER 1: LEGAL STATUS LEGAL STATUS AND APPLICATION The contents of this manual set out conditions that have been determined under section 220D(1) of the Transport (Compliance and Miscellaneous) Act 1983, except for: – the contents
    [Show full text]
  • May 2020 Published by the Australian Timetable Association
    TABLE TALK AUSTRALASIAN TIMETABLE NEWS No. 333, May 2020 Published by the Australian Timetable Association RAIL & TRAM NEWS NATIONAL Rail freight surges to re-stock shops The rush to refill supermarket shelves following the coronavirus panic-buying pushed up interstate rail haulage by as much as 15 per cent, according to Pacific National (PN). PN's boss, Dean Dalla Valle, said that PN had been playing catch-up with additional runs across the Nullarbor and along the East Coast to cope with the unseasonal demand. More the 60 per cent of goods imported into Western Australia come by rail, according to Mr Dalla Valle, and PN increased its services in the state by 15 per cent in the lead-up to the Easter weekend, with fresh fruit and vegetables from WA market gardens making up much of the return trade. Demand coming into Easter long weekend had increased its runs across the Nullarbor to more than 40 a week between Melbourne and Perth, while services to Brisbane had lifted by close to 10 per cent. He also said that while consumer goods had driven the surge in additional services, bulk coal and grain services were holding up well, but it was impossible to predict if freight and coal volumes would hold up in coming months. A double-stacked train across the Nullarbor can be as long as 1.8km and haul more than 330 shipping containers. Each container can hold 25,000 rolls of toilet paper, 1,500 cases of beer or 65,000 Easter chocolate bunnies. Aurizon and partner Linfox have also reported that freight deliveries into regional Queensland had lifted more than 20 per cent after the coronavirus outbreak.
    [Show full text]
  • Melbourne-Metropolitan-Tramways-Board-Building- 616-Little-Collins-Street-Melbourne
    Melbourne Metropolitan Tramway Study Gary Vines 2011 List of surviving heritage places Contents Horse Tramways ...................................................................................................... 2 Cable Tram engine houses..................................................................................... 2 Cable Tram car sheds ............................................................................................. 6 Electric Tram Depots .............................................................................................. 8 Waiting Shelters ...................................................................................................... 12 Substations .............................................................................................................. 20 Overhead and electricity supply ............................................................................ 24 Sidings and trackwork ............................................................................................ 26 Bridges ..................................................................................................................... 29 Workshops ............................................................................................................... 32 Offices ...................................................................................................................... 32 Recreation buildings ............................................................................................... 33 Accommodation
    [Show full text]
  • Event Agenda
    23-24 February 2022 Melbourne Convention & Exhibition Centre Melbourne, Victoria vicinfrastructure.com.au Conference Agenda Day 1 - 23rd February 07:45 - 08:15 Registration 08:15 - 08:35 MINISTERIAL ADDRESS Hon. Jacinta Allan, Minister for Transport Infrastructure, Minister for the Suburban Rail Loop, Victoria 08:35 - 08:45 MC OPENS 08:45 - 09:15 Speed Networking This speed networking session will allow delegates to introduce themselves and swap business cards with other conference attendees. 09:15 - 09:45 Growing and Maintaining Port Capabilities to Support Victoria’s Economy Contributing to the enhancement of the economic and social prosperity of the people of Victoria by providing vital infrastructure and services for national trade and tourism. Caryn Anderson, Executive General Manager Port Growth and Planning, Port of Melbourne 09:45 - 10:15 Exploring Transport Network Pricing Evaluating user schemes that require payment based on network usage. Analysing potential benefits; reduced road congestion, improved health and environmental outcomes, fairer costs for users and a more sustainable revenue stream for government. Infrastructure Victoria’s research into identifying best practice solutions to address current and future key problem areas on Melbourne’s transport network. A look at Infrastructure Victoria’s 2020 Transport Network Pricing Paper. Dr Jonathan Spear, Chief Operating Officer, Infrastructure Victoria 10:15 - 10:45 Modernising the Regional Network A joint initiative of the Victorian and Australian governments, the $4 billion Regional Rail Revival Program is upgrading every regional passenger line in Victoria and creating 3,000 jobs and supplier opportunities. Program Director Mark Havryluk will provide insights into how Rail Projects Victoria is delivering this massive program of works right across the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Melbourne Metro Tunnel Project—Phase 1: Early Works Tunnel 1: Early Metro Project—Phase Melbourne
    Melbourne Project—Phase Metro Early Tunnel 1: Works Victorian Auditor -General’s Office — Level 31 / 35 Collins Street Melbourne Vic 3000 T 03 8601 7000 [email protected] www.audit.vic.gov.au — Melbourne Metro Tunnel Project— June 2019 Phase 1: Early Works June 2019 2018–19: 28 Independent assurance report to Parliament 2018–19: 28 24022 VAGO_Melbourne Metro Tunnel Project-Phase 1-Early Works_Cover_r2.pdf | Page 1 of 1 24022 VAGO_Melbourne Metro Tunnel Project-Phase 1-Early Works_Cover_r2.pdf | Page 1 of 1 Melbourne Metro Tunnel Project— Phase 1: Early Works Independent assurance report to Parliament Ordered to be published VICTORIAN GOVERNMENT PRINTER June 2019 PP no 38, Session 2018–19 This report is printed on Monza Recycled paper. Monza Recycled is certified Carbon Neutral by The Carbon Reduction Institute in accordance with the global Greenhouse Gas Protocol and ISO 14040 framework. The Lifecycle Analysis for Monza Recycled is cradle to grave including Scopes 1, 2 and 3. It has FSC Mix Certification combined with 99% recycled content. ISBN 978 1 925678 50 5 The Hon Shaun Leane MLC The Hon Colin Brooks MP President Speaker Legislative Council Legislative Assembly Parliament House Parliament House Melbourne Melbourne Dear Presiding Officers Under the provisions of section 16AB of the Audit Act 1994, I transmit my report Melbourne Metro Tunnel Project—Phase 1: Early Works. Yours faithfully Andrew Greaves Auditor-General 6 June 2019 Contents Audit overview ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Arden Station Precinct Development Plan
    9 August 2021 AMENDMENT TO THE ARDEN STATION PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT PLAN Cross Yarra Partnership (CYP) has been contracted by Rail Projects Victoria (RPV) to design, build and maintain the stations and tunnel for the Metro Tunnel Project (the Project). Arden is to become a new destination and community of Melbourne – a place to work, live and visit – with a character that is modern, industrial, youthful and gritty. Arden Station will be the catalyst for the urban renewal of this precinct, and will be the heart of its economic, social and civic intensity. The Arden Station Precinct Development Plan was previously approved by the Minister for Planning on Thursday 8 March 2018. As part of this, a Consultation Summary Report was also provided. Since approval, the design for the Arden Station Precinct has progressed through detailed design following an iterative stakeholder engagement and design development process. Design development has led to changes at the Arden Station precinct including to improve access to the Arden Station, enhance flood protection and provide more greenery through retaining and planting more trees. CYP seeks comments on these changes from the stakeholders. As such, the Arden Station Precinct Development Plan has been amended in accordance with Clause 4.7.8 of the Project’s Incorporated Document and includes: • An explanation demonstrating additional stakeholder engagement during detailed design of Arden Station Precinct (refer to Section 1.3.2) • Information on changes to the architectural response, including raising
    [Show full text]
  • North East Link (NEL) Traffic and Transport Review Expert Evidence Statement
    North East Link (NEL) Traffic and Transport Review Expert Evidence Statement Prepared by: GTA Consultants (VIC) Pty Ltd for North East Link Project on 15/07/19 Reference: V153791 Issue #: Final North East Link (NEL) Traffic and Transport Review Expert Evidence Statement Client: North East Link Project Instructed by: Clayton Utz Hearing Date: 25/07/19 Report Date: 15/07/19 Reference: V153791 Issue #: Final © GTA Consultants (VIC) Pty Ltd [ABN 34 137 610 381] 2019 The information contained in this document is confidential and intended solely for the use of the client for the purpose for which it has been prepared and no representation is made or is to be implied as being made to any third party. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part Melbourne | Sydney | Brisbane without the written permission of GTA Consultants constitutes an infringement of copyright. The intellectual property contained in this Adelaide | Perth document remains the property of GTA Consultants. CONTENTS Introduction 1 1.1. Introduction 1 1.2. Qualifications and Experience 1 1.3. Relationship to Applicant 1 1.4. GTA Peer Review of the TTIA 1 1.5. Further Work Since Preparation of the GTA Peer Review Report 2 1.6. Expert Evidence Statement Scope & Purpose 3 1.7. References 6 1.8. Consideration of Submissions 6 1.9. Summary of Key Issues, Opinions and Recommendations 6 1.10. Declaration 13 Project Background 14 2.1. Introduction 14 2.2. Project Rationale 14 2.3. Key Transport Issues Sought to be Resolved by NEL 18 2.4. Public Works Order 23 2.5.
    [Show full text]