Resolving Distribution and Population Fragmentation in Two Leaf-Tailed Gecko Species of North-East Australia: Key Steps in the Conservation of Microendemic Species
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
CSIRO PUBLISHING Australian Journal of Zoology, 2018, 66, 152–166 https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO18036 Resolving distribution and population fragmentation in two leaf-tailed gecko species of north-east Australia: key steps in the conservation of microendemic species Lorenzo V. Bertola A, Megan Higgie A and Conrad J. Hoskin A,B ACollege of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia. BCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. North Queensland harbours many microendemic species. These species are of conservation concern due to their small and fragmented populations, coupled with threats such as fire and climate change. We aimed to resolve the distribution and population genetic structure in two localised Phyllurus leaf-tailed geckos: P. gulbaru and P. amnicola. We conducted field surveys to better resolve distributions, used Species Distribution Models (SDMs) to assess the potential distribution, and then used the SDMs to target further surveys. We also sequenced all populations for a mitochondrial gene to assess population genetic structure. Our surveys found additional small, isolated populations of both species, including significant range extensions. SDMs revealed the climatic and non-climatic variables that best predict the distribution of these species. Targeted surveys based on the SDMs found P. gulbaru at an additional two sites but failed to find either species at other sites, suggesting that we have broadly resolved their distributions. Genetic analysis revealed population genetic structuring in both species, including deeply divergent mitochondrial lineages. Current and potential threats are overlain on these results to determine conservation listings and identify management actions. More broadly, this study highlights how targeted surveys, SDMs, and genetic data can rapidly increase our knowledge of microendemic species, and direct management. Received 21 May 2018, accepted 4 October 2018, published online 2 November 2018 Introduction Borsboom et al. 2010; Couper and Hoskin 2013). The Some vertebrate species have remarkably small natural biogeographic insights and conservation challenges for these distributions. These species can be particularly interesting vertebrates are similar to those for ‘short-range endemic’ biogeographically, and are often of conservation significance invertebrates (Harvey et al. 2011). due to small and fragmented populations. Microendemic lizards Species may be highly localised and fragmented naturally and frogs characterise vertebrate diversity in the rainforests of due to long-term processes, or may have declined to small Queensland, in north-eastern Australia. Tropical and subtropical distributions in recent times due to human-associated impacts, rainforests have a broken distribution along the coastal or a combination of both. The small distributions of the mountains of Queensland and microendemic lizards and frogs Queensland rainforest lizards and frogs can generally be occur in these isolates (Moritz et al. 2005; Rosauer et al. 2017). considered to be natural – the result of long-term contraction As a broad-scale example, 13 leaf-tailed geckos species (Orraya, and fragmentation of rainforests over millions of years to mesic Saltuarius, Phyllurus) occur allopatrically across these rainforest refugia in the east-coast mountains (Moritz et al. 2005). These areas (Hoskin and Couper 2013). As a finer-scale example, 16 refugia have not been static in recent time, expanding and species of microhylid frogs (Cophixalus, Austrochaperina) contracting through the Pleistocene glacial cycles (Hugall et al. occur across the mountains of the largest of these areas, the 2002). To persist in an area, low-vagility rainforest-associated Wet Tropics (Hoskin 2004). Even small isolates harbour species had to survive through the globally dry glacial periods, considerable endemic diversity. For example, seven highly when Australian east-coast rainforests had their most restricted distinct rainforest-associated reptiles and frogs are restricted to known distribution (Hugall et al. 2002; Moritz et al. 2005; Bell the Melville Range, isolated from relatives in rainforest patches et al. 2010; Rosauer et al. 2017). In many areas from where to the north and south for millions of years (Hoskin 2014; rainforest largely disappeared, rainforest-associated reptile and Hoskin and Couper 2014). Many microendemics are restricted frog lineages persisted in deeply piled rocky areas that acted to a single mountain or range, while others occur as distinct as mesic refugia (‘lithorefugia’: Couper and Hoskin 2008). subpopulations separated by areas of unsuitable habitat (e.g. In coastal Queensland these lithorefugia range from large Journal compilation Ó CSIRO 2018 www.publish.csiro.au/journals/ajz Leaf-tailed gecko distribution and phylogeography Australian Journal of Zoology 153 boulder-fields to small areas of piled boulders on slopes or skink Nangura spinosa, which has received considerable in individual gullies (Couper and Hoskin 2008). Therefore, attention in regard to distribution, phylogeographic structure, climate, topography and geology have all played key roles abundance and threats (e.g. Borsboom et al. 2010). in persistence of rainforest lineages. Competition and other Here we attempt to resolve the fine-scale distribution and species interactions also play a role in shaping distributions, population genetic structure of two highly localised leaf-tailed but resolving these interactions is complex (Cunningham et al. geckos in north-east Queensland. Leaf-tailed geckos, the 2016). carphodactyline clade comprising the genera Phyllurus, Although these species appear to have persisted in small Saltuarius and Orraya, exemplify the pattern of microendemism areas for millennia (Moritz et al. 2005; Hoskin et al. 2011; in moist refugia along the east coast of Australia (Couper et al. Rosauer et al. 2017), they are still of conservation concern. Taxa 2000; Moritz et al. 2005; Hoskin and Couper 2013). This is with small distributions are among the most vulnerable to particularly the case for the genus Phyllurus, which comprises extinction (MacArthur and Wilson 1967; Terborgh and Winter nine species, eight of which are highly localised and distributed 1980; Gilpin and Soule 1986; Harvey et al. 2011). Stochastic contiguously in rainforest isolates along the coastal ranges of events (e.g. fire or drought) can affect the entire species, whereas Queensland (Couper and Hoskin 2013; Wilson and Swan 2013). for widespread species these events may affect some populations Most Phyllurus occur in mid-east Queensland but two species only. For this reason, distribution area is one of the key factors occur to the north, on the northern side of a long-term in threatened species listing, even without any evidence of biogeographic barrier, the Burdekin Gap (Hoskin et al. 2003). population decline (e.g. Vulnerable D2: IUCN 2012). Small These two species, P. amnicola and P. gulbaru, occur in the distributions also offer little buffering from human-induced Townsville region, at the far southern end of the Australian change in the environment, such as clearing, invasive species, Wet Tropics (Fig. 1). The Wet Tropics is a fairly continuous novel disease and climate change. Even seemingly localised area of tropical rainforest along the mountains and associated threats such as illegal collecting or hunting, or changes in fire coastal lowlands between Townsville, Cairns and Cooktown. regime, may impact the entire population of a highly localised At its southern extent, in the Townsville region, rainforest is species. Therefore, threatened species categories are based very patchy and confined to uplands, gullies and rocky slopes, in largely around the combination of distributional area/population a matrix of open, fire-prone eucalyptus woodland with a grassy size and observed or projected decline due to an identified threat understorey. (e.g. IUCN 2012). Phyllurus gulbaru was discovered in Patterson’s Gorge in Many of the highly localised Queensland rainforest lizards the southern Paluma Range in 2001 and was described in 2003 and frogs are listed as threatened species under federal (Hoskin et al. 2003). Surveys around the time of discovery (Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, found the species at two sites within the gorge, but not in EPBC Act, 1999) and state (Nature Conservation Act, NCA, adjacent areas, and the species was assumed to be restricted to 1992) legislation, based on small distributional area in the rocky habitats of Patterson’s Gorge (Hoskin et al. 2003). combination with observed or projected threats such as disease, P. amnicola was discovered on Mt Elliot, a southern upland climate change, and changes in fire regime (Curtis 2012). outlier to the Wet Tropics region, in 1998 and was described in Illegal collecting is an additional, currently unquantified, threat 2000 (Couper et al. 2000). Surveys at the time of discovery, and to many of these species due to their rarity and spectacular in the few years following, found the species in two areas on appearance (e.g. leaf-tailed geckos) (Auliya et al. 2016). While Mt Elliot and the species was thus assumed to be restricted to many species are listed, many others have not been assessed or rocky habitats on Mt Elliot (Couper et al. 2000; Hoskin et al. are considered Data Deficient due to a lack of information. Data 2003). Both species were found to be restricted to rocky Deficient species, and indeed most of the listed species, have