DOCSLIB.ORG

ATTACHMENT 2 Plan Bay Area 2040 Page 1 of 8 Job Growth Forecasts by Alternative Scenario (2010 to 2040)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ATTACHMENT 2 Plan Bay Area 2040 Page 1 of 8 Job Growth Forecasts by Alternative Scenario (2010 to 2040) Connected Jurisdiction Priority Development Area (PDA) Base Year No Project Main Streets Neighborhoods Big Cities ALAMEDA COUNTY Alameda 29,200 35,600 39,300 36,100 35,800 Naval Air Station 1,500 3,200 3,200 3,200 3,300 Northern Waterfront 5,500 6,300 6,000 6,200 6,100 Alameda County 28,900 35,200 33,400 31,600 31,400 Castro Valley Bay Area Rapid Transit 1,900 2,400 2,200 2,300 2,300 East 14th Street and Mission Boulevard 2,500 3,100 3,300 3,100 3,200 Hesperian Boulevard 1,800 2,200 2,200 2,300 2,100 Meekland Avenue Corridor 600 700 700 700 800 Albany 4,400 5,300 5,400 5,500 5,300 San Pablo & Solano Mixed Use Neighborhood 2,100 2,100 2,300 2,300 2,200 Berkeley 90,300 122,200 124,400 124,300 123,700 Adeline Street 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 Downtown 13,200 16,200 16,800 16,700 16,500 San Pablo Avenue 3,000 3,600 3,700 3,600 3,500 South Shattuck 800 700 1,000 900 1,000 Southside/Telegraph Avenue 8,100 11,800 12,400 12,500 12,400 University Avenue 2,400 2,100 2,300 2,100 2,200 Dublin 18,100 25,200 25,400 24,400 25,400 Downtown Specific Plan Area 4,500 7,300 7,300 6,700 7,300 Town Center 300 300 300 100 300 Transit Center/Dublin Crossings 200 300 300 300 300 Emeryville 15,900 25,300 25,700 25,400 25,300 Mixed-Use Core 13,500 20,800 21,200 20,900 20,900 Fremont 86,200 110,200 113,200 112,200 111,100 Centerville 5,300 5,600 6,000 5,900 5,800 City Center 15,900 16,100 16,100 16,400 16,100 Irvington District 5,200 5,400 5,900 5,900 5,400 Warm Springs 11,800 17,000 17,600 17,500 17,000 Hayward 60,900 98,200 97,700 100,400 98,600 Downtown 3,800 7,400 7,600 7,000 7,500 Mission Boulevard Corridor 2,100 3,100 3,100 3,000 3,100 South Hayward Bay Area Rapid Transit 1,000 1,700 1,600 1,600 1,700 The Cannery 800 600 600 600 600 Livermore 42,600 50,500 49,800 49,700 50,500 Downtown 4,300 5,600 5,300 5,000 5,500 East Side 14,100 16,100 15,400 15,500 16,100 Isabel Avenue/BART Station Planning Area 5,400 8,500 8,100 8,700 8,500 Item 8 Attachment 2 Page 1 of 16 Plan Bay Area 2040 Page 2 of 8 Job Growth Forecasts by Alternative Scenario (2010 to 2040) Connected Jurisdiction Priority Development Area (PDA) Base Year No Project Main Streets Neighborhoods Big Cities Newark 17,300 27,300 27,900 28,800 27,500 Dumbarton Transit Oriented Development - 200 200 1,100 200 Old Town Mixed Use Area 200 300 300 300 300 Oakland 179,100 268,600 268,800 271,600 275,000 Coliseum Bay Area Rapid Transit Station Area 12,900 21,300 18,500 19,700 23,800 Downtown & Jack London Square 73,000 97,100 101,000 98,700 99,500 Eastmont Town Center 5,500 7,000 7,300 7,400 6,900 Fruitvale and Dimond Areas 9,500 15,500 16,600 16,400 15,800 Golden Gate/North Oakland 7,700 9,900 10,300 10,400 9,400 MacArthur Transit Village 13,500 32,800 30,700 33,600 29,600 TOD Corridors 15,200 20,500 19,600 20,300 20,100 TOD Corridors International Boulevard 2,100 3,300 3,300 3,300 3,300 TOD Corridors San Antonio/Central Estuary 9,300 12,000 12,600 13,300 16,100 West Oakland 9,700 21,300 20,800 20,900 23,400 Piedmont 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,000 1,900 Pleasanton 60,100 71,500 72,300 67,300 68,300 Hacienda 12,500 19,500 24,100 18,800 19,600 San Leandro 49,700 68,700 68,800 69,300 70,300 Bay Fair Bay Area Rapid Transit Village 2,300 1,400 1,200 1,500 3,100 Downtown Transit Oriented Development 5,800 7,500 6,600 7,100 7,500 East 14th Street 1,600 2,200 2,000 2,200 2,000 Union City 21,000 30,400 31,000 30,400 30,100 Intermodal Station District 300 200 600 200 200 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Antioch 20,200 43,700 36,700 36,900 33,600 Hillcrest eBART Station 200 200 200 600 200 Rivertown Waterfront 1,900 3,600 3,600 3,500 3,600 Brentwood 11,600 14,200 15,300 13,800 13,500 Clayton 2,000 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,600 Concord 54,200 80,800 80,600 81,900 82,500 Community Reuse Area/Los Medanos - 6,800 6,800 6,800 6,800 Downtown 10,200 15,900 14,900 14,600 16,200 Contra Costa County 35,900 54,600 46,100 46,800 45,200 Contra Costa Centre 4,200 6,300 5,700 6,000 6,200 Downtown El Sobrante 1,100 1,400 1,500 1,400 1,400 Pittsburg/Bay Point BART Station 700 900 900 900 800 WCCTAC San Pablo Avenue Corridor A 900 1,200 1,300 1,200 1,200 Danville 11,800 10,900 11,800 11,100 11,200 Item 8 Attachment 2 Page 2 of 16 Plan Bay Area 2040 Page 3 of 8 Job Growth Forecasts by Alternative Scenario (2010 to 2040) Connected Jurisdiction Priority Development Area (PDA) Base Year No Project Main Streets Neighborhoods Big Cities Downtown 6,300 6,700 6,800 6,700 6,900 El Cerrito 5,300 6,800 6,700 6,800 7,700 San Pablo Avenue Corridor 3,800 6,600 6,300 6,500 7,500 Hercules 4,900 5,600 6,400 5,800 5,400 Central Hercules 1,000 1,300 1,600 900 1,300 Waterfront District 100 200 600 700 - WCCTAC San Pablo Avenue Corridor G - 100 100 100 100 Lafayette 9,000 9,500 10,100 9,600 9,500 Downtown 6,700 7,500 8,100 7,600 7,500 Martinez 20,800 27,200 27,100 26,600 27,100 Downtown 6,800 10,900 10,600 10,400 10,900 Moraga 4,500 6,100 5,900 5,900 5,900 Moraga Center 1,400 1,700 1,500 1,500 1,600 Oakley 3,300 4,200 4,300 4,200 3,800 Downtown 600 1,200 900 800 700 Employment Area 800 1,000 1,000 1,100 1,000 Potential Planning Area 200 200 400 300 200 Orinda 4,900 25,800 25,600 25,700 25,700 Downtown 2,600 3,500 3,400 3,400 3,500 Pinole 6,800 8,400 7,900 8,300 8,000 Appian Way Corridor 2,200 2,800 2,600 2,700 2,800 Old Town San Pablo Avenue 3,100 3,800 3,500 3,700 3,500 Pittsburg 11,800 20,400 20,000 19,900 20,700 Downtown 600 2,300 2,200 2,300 2,400 Railroad Avenue eBART Station 4,000 6,300 5,800 5,700 6,200 Pleasant Hill 16,300 19,300 19,600 19,100 19,100 Buskirk Avenue Corridor 5,700 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,000 Diablo Valley College - - - 700 - Richmond 30,800 76,600 75,400 80,600 74,900 Central Richmond & 23rd Street Corridor 6,300 12,300 11,600 11,700 11,000 North Richmond 1,800 3,400 2,900 3,200 3,400 South Richmond 5,500 29,100 28,300 29,800 28,200 WCCTAC San Pablo Avenue Corridor C 1,600 2,700 2,700 2,600 2,500 San Pablo 7,400 10,000 9,800 9,900 9,800 Rumrill Boulevard 400 900 900 900 900 San Pablo Avenue & 23rd Street Corridors 4,500 5,800 5,400 5,600 5,600 San Ramon 47,900 50,900 51,700 56,800 51,400 City Center 13,000 16,800 16,900 23,300 17,100 Item 8 Attachment 2 Page 3 of 16 Plan Bay Area 2040 Page 4 of 8 Job Growth Forecasts by Alternative Scenario (2010 to 2040) Connected Jurisdiction Priority Development Area (PDA) Base Year No Project Main Streets Neighborhoods Big Cities North Camino Ramon 12,700 13,300 13,200 12,400 13,300 Walnut Creek 51,000 54,900 55,400 55,300 55,800 Core Area 27,400 30,900 30,900 30,500 31,400 MARIN COUNTY Belvedere 300 300 300 300 300 Corte Madera 6,600 7,800 7,900 7,800 7,800 Fairfax 1,600 1,900 1,800 1,900 1,800 Larkspur 7,500 9,400 9,700 9,500 9,400 Marin County 17,500 22,300 22,400 23,000 22,300 Urbanized 101 Corridor 600 800 700 700 800 Mill Valley 6,000 6,800 7,100 7,000 6,900 Novato 26,400 34,000 33,900 33,700 33,800 Ross 400 600 600 600 600 San Anselmo 3,300 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 San Rafael 43,300 55,400 55,600 55,000 55,500 Downtown 9,000 12,400 12,000 11,600 12,200 Sausalito 5,200 6,100 6,200 6,200 6,100 Tiburon 2,800 2,800 2,900 2,800 2,800 NAPA COUNTY American Canyon 5,500 9,100 9,700 9,300 9,400 Highway 29 Corridor 1,300 2,100 2,400 2,000 2,200 Calistoga 2,200 1,900 2,100 2,000 2,000 Napa 34,000 36,300 37,500 37,100 36,600 Downtown Napa and Soscol Gateway Corridor 5,300 6,500 6,200 6,400 6,300 Napa County 20,600 27,700 23,600 25,300 23,400 St.
Recommended publications
  • SFO to San Francisco in 45 Minutes for Only $6.55!* in 30 Minutes for Only $5.35!*

    SFO to San Francisco in 45 Minutes for Only $6.55!* in 30 Minutes for Only $5.35!*

    Fold in to the middle; outside right Back Panel Front Panel Fold in to the middle; outside left OAK to San Francisco SFO to San Francisco in 45 minutes for only $6.55!* in 30 minutes for only $5.35!* BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit) from OAK is fast, easy and BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit) provides one of the world’s inexpensive too! Just take the convenient AirBART shuttle Visitors Guide best airport-to-downtown train services. BART takes you bus from OAK to BART to catch the train to downtown San downtown in 30 minutes for only $5.35 one-way or $10.70 Francisco. The entire trip takes about 45 minutes and costs round trip. It’s the fast, easy, inexpensive way to get to only $6.55 one-way or $13.10 round trip. to BART San Francisco. The AirBART shuttle departs every 15 minutes from the The BART station is located in the SFO International Terminal. 3rd curb across from the terminals. When you get off the It’s only a five minute walk from Terminal Three and a shuttle at the Coliseum BART station, buy a round trip BART 10 minute walk from Terminal One. Both terminals have ticket from the ticket machine. Take the escalator up to the Powell Street-Plaza Entrance connecting walkways to the International Terminal. You can westbound platform and board a San Francisco or Daly City also take the free SFO Airtrain to the BART station. bound train. The BART trip to San Francisco takes about 20 minutes. Terminal 2 (under renovation) Gates 40 - 48 Gates 60 - 67 Terminal 3 Terminal 1 Gates 68 - 90 Gates 20 - 36 P Domestic Want to learn about great deals on concerts, plays, Parking museums and other activities during your visit? Go to www.mybart.org to learn about fantastic special offers for BART customers.
  • 2017-2026 Samtrans Short Range Transit Plan

    2017-2026 Samtrans Short Range Transit Plan

    SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT Short-Range Transit Plan Fiscal Years 2017 – 2026 May 3, 2017 Acknowledgements San Mateo County Transit District Board of Directors 2017 Rose Guilbault, Chair Charles Stone, Vice Chair Jeff Gee Carole Groom Zoe Kersteen-Tucker Karyl Matsumoto Dave Pine Josh Powell Peter Ratto Senior Staff Michelle Bouchard, Chief Operating Officer, Rail Michael Burns, Interim Chief Officer, Caltrain Planning / CalMod April Chan, Chief Officer, Planning, Grants, and Transportation Authority Jim Hartnett, General Manager/CEO Kathleen Kelly, Interim Chief Financial Officer / Treasurer Martha Martinez, Executive Officer, District Secretary, Executive Administration Seamus Murphy, Chief Communications Officer David Olmeda, Chief Operating Officer, Bus Mark Simon, Chief of Staff Short Range Transit Plan Project Staff and Contributors Douglas Kim, Director, Planning Lindsey Kiner, Senior Planner, Planning David Pape, Planner, Planning Margo Ross, Director of Transportation, Bus Transportation Karambir Cheema, Deputy Director ITS, Bus Transportation Ana Rivas, South Base Superintendent, Bus Transportation Ladi Millard, Director of Budgets, Finance Ryan Hinchman, Manager Financial Planning & Analysis, Finance Donald G. Esse, Senior Operations Financial Analyst, Bus Operations Leslie Fong, Senior Administrative Analyst, Grants Tina Dubost, Manager, Accessible Transit Services Natalie Chi, Bus Maintenance Contract Administrator, Bus Transportation Joan Cassman, Legal Counsel (Hanson Bridgett) Shayna M. van Hoften, Legal Counsel (Hanson
  • SAMTRANS CORRESPONDENCE As of 12-11-2020

    SAMTRANS CORRESPONDENCE As of 12-11-2020

    SAMTRANS CORRESPONDENCE as of 12-11-2020 December 8, 2020 The Honorable Gavin Newsom Governor, State of California State Capitol, Suite 1173 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Governor Newsom: Bay Area transit systems continue to struggle in the face of dramatically reduced ridership and revenues due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This challenge was already the most significant crisis in the history of public transportation, and now it has persisted far longer than any of us would have predicted. Since the beginning, our workers have been on the front lines, doing their jobs as essential workers, responsible for providing other front line workers with a way to safely travel to and from essential jobs. Now that the availability of a vaccine is on the horizon, we are proud to echo the attached call from the Amalgamated Transit Union (ATU). Specifically, we urge you to work to ensure that transit, paratransit, and school transportation workers are prioritized along with other essential workers to receive the vaccine following the critical need to vaccinate the State’s healthcare workers. Even with reduced ridership, an average of 8 million monthly riders continue to depend on Bay Area transit services. These riders are the healthcare workers, grocery clerks, caregivers, emergency services personnel and others doing the critical work that has kept California functioning during the pandemic. They cannot continue to do so without access to reliable public transportation, and are therefore dependent on the health of the transit workers that serve them every day. Our agencies have worked hard to ensure the public health of riders and transit workers during this crisis.
  • Senior Resource Guide

    Senior Resource Guide

    SENIOR RESOURCE GUIDE Non-Profit and Public Agencies Serving NORTH ALAMEDA COUNTY Alameda ● Albany ● Berkeley ● Emeryville ● Oakland ● Piedmont Senior Information & Assistance Program – Alameda County Area Agency on Aging 6955 Foothill Blvd, Suite 143 (1st Floor), Oakland, CA 94605; 1-800-510-2020 / 510-577-3530; http://seniorinfo.acgov.org Office Hours : 8:30am – 4pm Monday – Friday ADULT DAY CARE/RESPITE (useful website: www.daybreakcenters.org): Alzheimer's Services of the East Bay - ASEB, Berkeley, www.aseb.org .................................................................................................................................... 510-644-8292 Bay Area Community Services - BACS, Oakland, http://bayareacs.org ................................................................................................................................... 510-601-1074 Centers for Elders Independence - CEI, (PACE - Program of All-inclusive Care for the Elderly); www.cei.elders.org ..................................................... 844-319-1150 DayBreak Adult Care Centers, (personalized referrals & community education); http://daybreakcenters.org ................................................................ 510-834-8314 Hong Fook Adult Day Health Care, Oakland, (14th Street site); www.fambridges.org ........................................................................................................ 510-839-9673 Hong Fook Adult Day Health Care, Oakland, (Harrison Street site); www.fambridges.org ................................................................................................
  • Background Statement to Bay Area Regional Government

    Background Statement to Bay Area Regional Government

    ~1t1!trm./ALAMEDA-CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT DISTRICT Latham Square Building· 508 Sixteenth Street, Oakland, California 94612 • Telephone 654-7878 April 11, 1968 Mr. Chairman and Members of the Joint Committee on Bay Area Regional Government STATEMENT BY ALAMEDA-CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT DISTRICT BACKGROUND AND HISTORY The Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District was created in 1956 by a vote of the electorate in the East Bay. The enabling statute I the IITransi t District Law," ,..,.as adopted by the Legislature in 1955 after a long period of study and agonizing over the transit service offered by the Key System Transit Lines. As early as 1950 a report was issued to the Mayors and City Managers of the cities of the East Bay, recommending that a public agency be created to take over and operate a transit system in the East Bay. In 1953, after the disasterous 76-day Key System strike, the cities and counties of the East Bay fashioned the legislation which eventually resulted in the creation of the Alameda-Contra Costa Transit Districto Two-thirds of the cities in the originally proposed area of the District had to vote in favor of placing the matter on the ballot. The electorate in an equal number of cities in the proposed district had to vote in favor of creating the District. The Board of Directors of the District are directly elected by the voters, two at-large and five from wards evenly dis­ tributed throughout the district. The voters of the district approved a bond issue in 1959, permitting the District to purchase facilities from Key System Transit Lines and to commence operations in 1960.
  • West Contra Costa High-Capacity Transit Study

    West Contra Costa High-Capacity Transit Study

    West Contra Costa High-Capacity Transit Study FINAL TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #4 Summary and Evaluation of Prior Studies September 2015 West Contra Costa High-Capacity Transit Study Document Version Control Revision Updated By Organization Description of Revision Date Incorporate feedback from BART 8/14/2015 Doris Lee Parsons Brinckerhoff Board Member City of Richmond staff requested that South Richmond Transportation 8/20/2015 Doris Lee Parsons Brinckerhoff Connectivity Plan be included. Tech memo updated to note that this plan is covered in Section 2.15 Incorporated edits to address SMG 8/27/2015 Doris Lee Parsons Brinckerhoff and TAC feedback 9/16/15 Tam Tran Parsons Brinckerhoff Made minor edits related to tense Document Sign-off Name Date Signature Rebecca Kohlstrand 09/16/15 ii Draft Summary and Evaluation of Prior Studies September 2015 West Contra Costa High-Capacity Transit Study Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 West Contra Costa County Transportation Setting ........................................... 1 1.2 Study Purpose .................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Purpose of this Technical Memorandum ........................................................... 3 2 Review OF Prior Studies .................................................................................... 4 2.1 BART West Contra Costa Extension Study, 1983 ...........................................
  • Form 990-PF Return of Private Foundation

    Form 990-PF Return of Private Foundation

    0 0 Return of Private Foundation OMB No 1545-0052 Form 990-PF or Section 4947(a)(1) Nonexempt Charitable Trust Department of the Treasury Treated as a Private Foundation Internal Revenue Service 2008 Note. The foundation may be able to use a copy of this return to satisfy state reporting requirements. For calendar year 2008 , or tax year beginning , and ending G Check all that apply Initial return Final return Amended return L_J Address change Name change A Employer identification number Use the IRS Name of foundation label. Otherwise, HARLES STEWART MOTT FOUNDATION 38-1211227 print Number and street (or P 0 box number if mail is not delivered to street address ) Room/su to B Telephone number or type . 03 S. SAGINAW STREET 200 (810) 238-5651 See Specific City or town, state, and ZIP code C If exemption application is pending, check here Instructions . ► LINT MI 48502-1851 D 11.Foreign organizations, check here • 2. Foreign organizations meeting the 85% test. H Check typea of organization: XSection 501 (c)(3) exempt private foundation check here and attach computation = Section 4947(a)( 1 ) nonexemp t charitable trus t 0 Other taxable private foundation E If private foundation status was terminated I Fair market value of all assets at end of year J Accounting method: L_J Cash X Accrua l under section 507(b)(1)(A), check here (from Part ll, col (c), line 16) 0 Other (specify) F If the foundation is in a 60-month termination 1 933 , 369 747. (Part 1, column (d) must be on cash basis) under section 507(b)(1)(B), check here Part I Analysis of Revenue and Expenses (a) Revenue and (b) Net investment (c) Adjusted net (d) Disbursements (The total of amounts in columns ( b), (c), and (d) may not for charitable purposes necessarily equal the amounts in column (a) ex p enses p er books income income (cash basis only) 1 Contributions, gifts, grants, etc., received 2 Check it the foundation is not required to attach Sch B on savings and temporary 3 , 460 , 484.
  • Appendix F Flooding and Drainage Assessment

    Appendix F Flooding and Drainage Assessment

    Appendix F Flooding and Drainage Assessment 870 Market Street, Suite 1278 San Francisco, CA 94102-2906 t. 415-433-4848 Schaaf & Wheeler f. 415-433-1029 CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS s&[email protected] MEMORANDUM TO: Hannah Darst DATE: March 24, 2020 David J. Powers & Associates FROM: Caitlin Gilmore, PE JOB#: DPOW.100.18 SUBJECT: The San Jose Flea Market Mixed Use Development Flooding and Drainage Evaluation Updated INTRODUCTION This memorandum is an update to the previous analysis completed in September of 2005. David J Powers is preparing an EIR to develop 52 acres of residential units and office space with two new bridge crossings to the south side of the previously analyzed Flea Market site, south of Berryessa Road, east of Coyote Creek and adjacent to the new VTA/BART line. In addition to focusing on the south side of Berryessa Road, this update includes several changes which have occurred in the watershed; namely the completion of the BART/VTA track guideway and Berryessa Station, the improvements to Upper Penitencia Creek with bridge replacements and studies of the watershed completed on behalf of VTA and the Santa Clara Valley Water District. In addition, the phase of the Flea Market development on the north side of Berryessa Road is under construction. The objective of this study is to describe the existing flood and drainage conditions at the proposed San Jose Flea Market mixed use development project (north and south), the potential project constraints, and potential impacts of the proposed project. The project area includes Upper Penitencia Creek and is adjacent to Coyote Creek.
  • Building a Better BART: the Future of the Bay Area's Rapid Transit

    Building a Better BART: the Future of the Bay Area's Rapid Transit

    BUILDING A BETTER BART Investing in the Future of the Bay Area’s Rapid Transit System July 2014 DRAFT Building a Better BART TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction BART’s Role in the Region Investing in BART’s Future Overview of the BART System BART’s Recent Accomplishments Building a Better BART: Major Investment Initiatives Conclusion: Allocating Limited Resources III 392,300 daily riders 331,600 daily riders 1976 Embarcadero station opens daily riders 1973 211,600 20 new stations daily riders 146,800 1962 daily riders Voters approve 2003 $792 million 1996 Four SFO Extension bond to fund Colma and stations begin 2011 construction of Pittsburg/Bay service: South San West Dublin/ 71-mile Point stations Francisco, San Bruno, Pleasanton BART System open SFIA, and Millbrae station opens 1978 1985 2001 2013 1957 California State 1995 2007 2012 Legislature North Concord/ Annual ridership Record ridership creates the Martinez station BART District hits a record of 568,061 opens 101.7 million exits in a day 1997 1972 Castro Valley and BART begins serving Dublin/Pleasanton 12 stations between stations open MacArthur and Fremont 1974 Transbay Service begins The Story of BART BART’s capacity as demographic changes have made INTRODUCTION transit increasingly popular. The region is planning for In 1962, the residents of the Bay Area made a visionary much of its future growth to be located around BART investment in the region’s future by voting to fund stations, which will add even more passengers. Finally, the initial construction of the Bay Area Rapid Transit system extensions are under construction to southern system (BART).
  • BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT 300 Lakeside Drive, P.O

    BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT 300 Lakeside Drive, P.O

    SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT 300 Lakeside Drive, P.O. Box 12688 Oakland, CA 94604-2688 (510) 464-6000 2008 April 18, 2008 Gail Murray PRESIDENT V1A E-MAIL and Thomas M. Blalock, P.E. VICE PRESIDENT U.S. POSTAL SERVICE Dorothy W. Dugger GENERAL MANAGER Mr. Kevin Kennedy, Chief Program Evaluation Branch DIRECTORS Office of Climate Change California Air Resources Board Gail Murray 1ST DISTRICT 1001 I Street Joel Keller Sacramento, CA 95814 2ND DISTRICT Bob Franklin RE: Role of Offsets Under AB 32 3RD DISTRICT Carole Ward Allen 4TH DISTRICT Dear Mr. Kennedy: Zoyd Luce 5TH DISTRICT The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit Dist1ict ("BART") operates a heavy Thomas M. Blalock, P.E. rail public rapid-transit system serving the San Francisco Bay Area. The system 6TH DISTRICT consists of 104 miles of track and 43 stations, and serves 1.3 billion passenger Lynette Sweet miles per year. Because each BART trip is estimated to produce onl y 14% of 7TH DISTRICT the per-mile greenhouse gas ("GHG") emissions generated by travel by private JamesFang 8TH DISTRICT auto, BART helps to reduce the Bay Area's net greenhouse gas emissions by an Tom Radulovich estimated 0.4 million metric tons ("MMT") CO2 per year. Thi s reducti on is 9TH DISTRICT equi valent to roughl y one percent of the Bay Area's transpo11ation sector CO2 emissions, and is the same magnitude as many of the Discrete Early Action measures adopted by ARB. BART appreciates the oppo11unity to respond to the GHG emission offsets questions posed by Air Resources Board staff in connectiory with the April 4, 2008 AB 32 Technical Stakeholder Worki ng Group Meeting on offsets.
  • Semi-Annual Report June 2017

    Semi-Annual Report June 2017

    2000 Measure A Program Semi-Annual Report June 2017 2000 Measure A Program Semi-Annual Report – June 2017 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND PROJECT COSTS A. Executive Summary .............................................................................1-2 B. Project Costs .........................................................................................1-5 C. Measure A Fund Exchange ................................................................1..-8 D. Funding................................................................................................1-.9 2 PROJECT SUMMARY REPORTS 1 Silicon Valley Rapid Transit 1. BART SV Program Development Implementation & 2-1-1 Warm Springs 2. BART SV Corridor Establishment and Maintenance ..........................2-1-2 3. Berryessa Extension Project SVBX - Phase 1 ................................2-1-3.... 4 Future Extension to Santa Clara – Phase II and NMF .........................2-1-4 5. BART Core Systems Modifications (BCS) ................................2-........1-5 6. Other Supporting Project ………………………………….. 2-1-6 2. Mineta San Jose Airport People Mover ..............................................2-2 3. Capitol Expressway Light Rail to Eastridge .......................................2-3 4. Low Floor Light Rail Vehicles.............................................................2-4 5. Caltrain – Capacity Improvements & Electrification ...........................2-5 6. Caltrain Service Upgrades ................................................................2...-6
  • 201,500 SF San Jose, CA RENOVATIONS COMPLETE! 3151 Zanker Road

    201,500 SF San Jose, CA RENOVATIONS COMPLETE! 3151 Zanker Road

    CLICK HERE FOR VIRTUAL TOUR 3151 zanker road 201,500 SF San Jose, CA RENOVATIONS COMPLETE! 3151 zanker road Lobby Building Overview 3151 zanker road 2-story, stand-alone headquarters building 201,500 SF Available Now Corner identity at Montague Expressway and Zanker Road Building & Monument Signage Power: 4,000 amps @ 277/480 volts (ability to expand up to 12,000 amps total) Building Infrastructure HVAC: 586 tons Parking: 3.2/1,000 Shipping/Receiving 2 dock high doors 1 grade level door Walk to amenities Walk to public transit Fitness center w/showers Ownership New Indoor/Outdoor Cafe and deck + Commercial Kitchen On-Site Amenities Extensive Interior & Exterior Renovations 1.2 Acre Outdoor Amenity Area w/full size basketball + tennis court, sand volleyball COMPLETE! court, plus 1/2 basketball court 2nd floor balconies Site Plan 3151 zanker road CLICK HERE FOR VIRTUAL TOUR Shipping/ 3151 Zanker Receiving 201,500 SF Main MONTAGUE EXPY Lobby 1.2 Acre Outdoor Amenity Area, includes: - Full Size Basketball + Tennis Court - Sand Volleyball Court - 1/2 Basketball Court - Amphitheater INNOVATION DR - Indoor/Outdoor Deck ZANKER RD 3151 zanker road 3151 zanker road Floor Plan New Outdoor Deck Folding Glass First Floor Door 124,635 SF Elec RacquetCourt Ball Dining Area Lab Completed Lab Market Ready Cardio W Café improvements Commercial Storage Ramp Kitchen Lab Lab Fitness Dock include: M Elec. Stor. Well New enhanced building entry Tel. Office Office Office Office Office Office Shipping/ Receiving Open Office Mail Conf. Stor. New expanded 2-story Office prominent lobby Elec. Office M W Office New indoor/outdoor cafe and deck W M with folding glass door Conf.