Risto Stefov

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Risto Stefov History of the Macedonian People From Ancient times to the Present By Risto Stefov History of the Macedonian People From Ancient times to the Present Published by: Risto Stefov Publications [email protected] Toronto, Canada All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without written consent from the author, except for the inclusion of brief and documented quotations in a review. e-book edition Copyright 2005 by Risto Stefov 2 PREFACE Ever since their beginning the Greek, Bulgarian and Serbian States and to a lesser extent the Albanian State have systematically used every means possible, including waging propaganda campaigns, to negate the existence of the Macedonian nation. They have done this not because Macedonians do not exist but purely to usurp Macedonian territories and the rich Macedonian heritage. Until recently there were no organized Macedonian voices to speak for the Macedonian people and their rights as citizens of this world, so Macedonia’s adversaries, the Greeks, Bulgarians, Serbians and more recently the Albanians, spoke for them. The time has now come when Macedonians are taking matters into their own hands and challenging old beliefs and the illegitimacy of those who have been speaking for them. Only Macedonians are the rightful heirs of the Macedonian heritage and the composers of Macedonia’s history. The Macedonians are not Greeks, Bulgarians, Serbians or Albanians. Neither can they simultaneously be Greeks, Bulgarians, Serbians and Albanians as their adversaries claim. The Greeks claim that “Macedonia is Greek” and has been for four thousand years. Contrary to ancient and modern evidence, they continue to insist that the ancient Macedonians were Greek. Again contrary to evidence and without proof, the modern Greeks claim that they are the direct descendants of the ancient Greeks and as such are the rightful owners of the ancient heritage. Furthermore, and without a shred of evidence, they claim that “all” the ancient Macedonians were killed off during the so called “Slav invasions” of the fifth and sixth centuries AD and there is no one left but the Greeks to claim Macedonia’s heritage. The Greeks, again without any evidence, claim that the modern Macedonians are Slavs who invaded Macedonia during the fifth and sixth centuries AD and have nothing in common with the ancient Macedonians and therefore have no rights to the Macedonian heritage. This book challenges all Greek claims and without any doubt will prove that they are no more than a “Greek myth”. Firstly, it is well known that a “Greek State” never existed before 1829. The ancient City States were conquered by Philip II, king of Macedonia in 338 BC and were never united into a single nation until the creation of the Greek Kingdom in 1832. Was it not the Macedonians who conquered the ancient City States? How then can ancient Macedonia be Greek? The Great Powers created the modern Greek Kingdom for the first time in 1832 as an attempt to partition the Ottoman Empire and prevent the formation of a single Slavic State in the Balkans. The Great Powers, Britain and France, created modern Greece purely for the purpose of blocking Russian access to the Mediterranean Sea. As for the purity of the modern Greek nation there is ample evidence, both historical and scientific, that contradicts modern Greek claims. For example 3 there is no modern pure Greek race that directly descended from the ancient City States. Today’s modern Greeks, like other nations in the Balkans, are made up of Slavs, Macedonians, Turks, Albanians, Roma, Vlachs, etc. A modern Greek person is only Greek by education or by assimilation and has no roots beyond 1832 when the Greek State and the Greek Nation were created for the first time. The modern Greek not only has a mythical past but sadly has abandoned and forsaken his or her own real roots and heritage. There are many examples of how the Greek State achieved nationhood at the expense of other races. For example, when Greece occupied Macedonian territories for the first time in 1912 there were no Greeks living in Macedonia. Yet a few years later the Greek State produced statistics that showed that the vast majority of the Macedonian population was Greek. How was that possible? In reality it was not. The Greek State shamelessly assimilated the Macedonian population by forcibly changing the people’s Macedonian names and toponyms into Greek ones. During the 1920’s, in its population exchanges with Turkey, Greece imported one million Christian Turks, about one fifth of its entire population, from Asia Minor and settled most of them in Macedonia. These people too became Greeks by force. The real flaw in the Greek State’s genealogical claim to the ancients is that, after eighty years of living on Macedonian soil, it convinced the Asian newcomers that they are the rightful owners of the Macedonian lands and heritage because they were told that they were the real direct descendants of the ancient Macedonians and not the indigenous Macedonian population they replaced. The Greek State is not above deception and lies, even to its own people, to convince the world that Greeks and Greeks alone are the rightful heirs of Macedonia’s lands and heritage. This is all done at the expense of the real Macedonians who had lived on those lands for hundreds of generations and have now been displaced. The Bulgarians too have claims on Macedonian territories and are using every means possible to convince the world that Macedonia rightfully belongs to them. The Bulgarian claim is that “Macedonia is Bulgarian” because the Macedonian people are Bulgarian. They are Bulgarian because they speak a “dialect” of the Bulgarian language. This book also challenges Bulgarian claims and will prove that they too are flawed and contradictory. It is well known that the Macedonians were already living in the Balkans and speaking the Slav language long before the first Bulgar Khans with their Turk and Tartar hoards arrived. Evidence shows that the numerically inferior Bulgars became assimilated into the larger indigenous Slav speaking population and adopted the Slav language and culture. More correctly, the Bulgarians speak a dialect of the Macedonian language, not the other way around. After all, was it 4 not the Macedonian brothers Kiril and Metodi from Solun who enlightened the Bulgarians? Without going into too much detail at this point, I want to mention that the aim of this book is to present the reader with a Macedonian perspective of Macedonia’s history. It is time the world heard the Macedonian point of view. Contrary to what Macedonia’s adversaries profess, the truth is on the Macedonian side. There is ample evidence that shows that the ancient Macedonians not only survived the many calamities from ancient times to now but their descendants do exist in Greece, Bulgaria, the Republic of Macedonia, Albania, Canada, Australia, the United States of America, Europe and the world over. They are now in the process of regrouping and are using the tools of the information age to fight back and retake what is theirs. This book is a chronological outline of historical events involving Macedonia and the Macedonian people from prehistoric times to the present. It is not complete in detail by any means but will give the reader a general analysis of Macedonia’s history. The book is written in the English language specifically for the younger generations in the Diaspora who want to learn Macedonian history but do not necessarily have the time or resources to do long and extensive research. Besides providing a comprehensive historical analysis, this book contains valuable information collected from interviews and personal experiences that cannot be found anywhere else. Also, since this book represents the Macedonian point of view, on occasion it will use Macedonian words to describe some of the more familiar place names like Solun (Salonica), Tsari Grad (Constantinople) and the Byzantines (Byzantines). 5 Table of Contents PREFACE ...................................................................................................3 Table of Contents ........................................................................................6 Introduction.................................................................................................7 Chapter 1 - The Beginning........................................................................18 Chapter 2 - The Rise of Macedonia ..........................................................21 Chapter 3 - The Early Macedonian Kingdom...........................................36 Chapter 4 - Rise of the Macedonian Empire.............................................50 Chapter 5 - Philip II - The Greatest of the Kings of Europe.....................59 Chapter 6 - Alexander III - The Greatest of the Great Conquerors ..........68 Chapter 7 - Alexander III - Lord of Asia ..................................................82 Chapter 8 - Alexander III - To the Ends of the Earth, the Trek to India...97 Chapter 9 - The Aftermath of Alexander’s Empire ................................112 Chapter 10 - Prelude to War with Rome.................................................128 Chapter 11 - War with Rome, the Decline of the Macedonian Empires.142 Chapter 12 - Cleopatra VII the Last of the Great Macedonian Monarchs .................................................................................................................157
Recommended publications
  • VU Research Portal
    VU Research Portal The impact of empire on market prices in Babylon Pirngruber, R. 2012 document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in VU Research Portal citation for published version (APA) Pirngruber, R. (2012). The impact of empire on market prices in Babylon: in the Late Achaemenid and Seleucid periods, ca. 400 - 140 B.C. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. E-mail address: [email protected] Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 THE IMPACT OF EMPIRE ON MARKET PRICES IN BABYLON in the Late Achaemenid and Seleucid periods, ca. 400 – 140 B.C. R. Pirngruber VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT THE IMPACT OF EMPIRE ON MARKET PRICES IN BABYLON in the Late Achaemenid and Seleucid periods, ca. 400 – 140 B.C. ACADEMISCH PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad Doctor aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, op gezag van de rector magnificus prof.dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Synoikism, Urbanization, and Empire in the Early Hellenistic Period Ryan
    Synoikism, Urbanization, and Empire in the Early Hellenistic Period by Ryan Anthony Boehm A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ancient History and Mediterranean Archaeology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Emily Mackil, Chair Professor Erich Gruen Professor Mark Griffith Spring 2011 Copyright © Ryan Anthony Boehm, 2011 ABSTRACT SYNOIKISM, URBANIZATION, AND EMPIRE IN THE EARLY HELLENISTIC PERIOD by Ryan Anthony Boehm Doctor of Philosophy in Ancient History and Mediterranean Archaeology University of California, Berkeley Professor Emily Mackil, Chair This dissertation, entitled “Synoikism, Urbanization, and Empire in the Early Hellenistic Period,” seeks to present a new approach to understanding the dynamic interaction between imperial powers and cities following the Macedonian conquest of Greece and Asia Minor. Rather than constructing a political narrative of the period, I focus on the role of reshaping urban centers and regional landscapes in the creation of empire in Greece and western Asia Minor. This period was marked by the rapid creation of new cities, major settlement and demographic shifts, and the reorganization, consolidation, or destruction of existing settlements and the urbanization of previously under- exploited regions. I analyze the complexities of this phenomenon across four frameworks: shifting settlement patterns, the regional and royal economy, civic religion, and the articulation of a new order in architectural and urban space. The introduction poses the central problem of the interrelationship between urbanization and imperial control and sets out the methodology of my dissertation. After briefly reviewing and critiquing previous approaches to this topic, which have focused mainly on creating catalogues, I point to the gains that can be made by shifting the focus to social and economic structures and asking more specific interpretive questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Hellenistic Athens: Leadership and Diplomacy
    IOANNA KRALLI EARLY HELLENISTIC ATHENS: LEADERSHIP AND DIPLOMACY PhD THESIS UCL ProQuest Number: 10016711 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10016711 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Abstract In my thesis I examine certain aspects of the political history of Athens in the early Hellenistic period, that is after the battle of Chaironeia in 338 B.C. and until the late 260s. For Athens this was a transitional period; she had to face a completely new political reality: she was no longer the great power of the fifth or even the fourth century B.C., Macedonia rose to power, then Alexander created a huge empire and his death triggered endless struggles for power among his Successors, in which Athens found herself involved. Independent foreign policy then on the part of Athens was impossible; on the other hand, diplomacy became more delicate and demanding than ever. I focus on the ways in which the Athenian leadership (the generals and the orators) adjusted to the circumstances. Firstly, I have examined the role of the generals in diplomacy in order to establish that they did assume increased responsibilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander the Great and the Hellenistic Age
    Macquarie University Department of Ancient History 2nd Semester, 2011. AHIS 241 / 341 AlexanderAlexander thethe GreatGreat andand thethe HellenisticHellenistic AgeAge Unit Outline, Schedule, Tutorial Materials and Bibliography 1 Contents: Unit Introduction and Requirements p. 3 Unit Schedule: Lecture and Tutorial topics p. 9 Map 1: Alexander's March of Conquest. p. 11 Weekly Tutorial Materials p. 12 Map 2: Alexander's Successors, 303 B.C. p. 17 Map 3: The 3rd Century World of Alexander’s Successors p. 18 Map 4: The Background to the Maccabean Revolt p. 27 Unit Main Bibliography p. 32 2 Macquarie University Department of Ancient History 2011 AHIS 241 / 341: Alexander the Great and the Hellenistic Age. UNIT INTRODUCTION This Unit on Alexander the Great and the ‘Hellenistic Age’ will begin with the political situation in Fourth Century Greece and the rise of Macedon. It will focus first on the career of Alexander the Great, and the interpretation of a number of key episodes in his life. The aim will be to build up an overall picture of his motives and achievements, and the consequences of his extraordinary conquests for later history. The focus will then turn to the break up of his ‘Empire’ at his death, and the warfare among his successors which led to the creation of the great rival kingdoms of the Hellenistic period. The Unit will be primarily a study in cultural history, set against the background of the political history of the Mediterranean world. It will not be tied to an event-by-event account of the post- Classical Greek world, but will focus also on the history of ideas and institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridging the Hellespont: the Successor Lysimachus - a Study
    BRIDGING THE HELLESPONT: THE SUCCESSOR LYSIMACHUS - A STUDY IN EARLY HELLENISTIC KINGSHIP Helen Sarah Lund PhD University College, London ProQuest Number: 10610063 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10610063 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 ABSTRACT Literary evidence on Lysimachus reveals a series of images which may say more about contemporary or later views on kingship than about the actual man, given the intrusion of bias, conventional motifs and propaganda. Thrace was Lysimachus* legacy from Alexander's empire; though problems posed by its formidable tribes and limited resources excluded him from the Successors' wars for nearly ten years, its position, linking Europe and Asia, afforded him some influence, Lysimachus failed to conquer "all of Thrace", but his settlements there achieved enough stability to allow him thoughts of rule across the Hellespont, in Asia Minor, More ambitious and less cautious than is often thought, Lysimachus' acquisition of empire in Asia Minor, Macedon and Greece from c.315 BC to 284 BC reflects considerable military and diplomatic skills, deployed primarily when self-interest demanded rather than reflecting obligations as a permanent member of an "anti-Antigonid team".
    [Show full text]
  • Gods, Goddesses and Flying Horses: a History of Coins in Ancient Greece
    Gods, Goddesses and Flying Horses: A History of Coins in Ancient Greece Prepared for Freshman Seminar by J. Edward Taylor© Last updated January 2016 Forward The first thing that drew me to ancient Greek coins was the Owl, the silver stater (or main coin) of ancient Athens featured on the front page of this paper. It was Athens’ solution to the problem confronting trade everywhere and throughout history: how to pay for goods no matter how far away from home, using a compact medium whose value everyone could recognize and agree upon. American dollars play this role in world markets today. Hoards from the 5th Century BC, unearthed all around the Mediterranean Sea, confirm that Owls were the world’s first great international currency. The earliest coins look more like miniature sculptures than modern industrially produced coins, and unlike the Owl of Athens, most were used locally. For example, early siglos and double siglos of Lydia, where coinage began, are found in hoards unearthed in and around Lydia but not very far beyond. The same is true for the coins of most Greek city-states (poleis). It was only important that local people agreed upon the value of these coins. As commerce and the Athenian empire expanded, the need arose for coins whose legitimacy was easily recognized over an ever larger geographic area, so that traders from Athens, for example, could easily purchase cotton from Egypt or grain from the Black Sea or Italy, and Athens could pay its sailors and maintain its far-flung fleet. Seventy years after the fall of Athens in the Peloponnesian War, Alexander the Great recognized the importance of a uniform currency.
    [Show full text]
  • Relationship: Alfred Landon Peterson to Seleucus I Nicator Seleucus I Nicator Is the 80Th Great Grandfather of Alfred Landon Peterson
    Relationship: Alfred Landon Peterson to Seleucus I Nicator Seleucus I Nicator is the 80th great grandfather of Alfred Landon Peterson 80th great grandfather Seleucus I Nicator Apama I Baktria b: 358 BC b: 100 AD Macedonia, Greece Bc Bactria,,,Syria d: 281 BC d: 282 AD Bab Ilu or Babylon, Mesopotamia, ,,British Columbia,Canada 79th great grandfather Antiochus I Soter b: 324 BC Bab Ilu or Babylon, Mesopotamia, d: 02 Jun 261 BC Bab Ilu or Babylon, Mesopotamia, 78th great grandfather Antiochus II Theos b: 286 BC Bab Ilu or Babylon, Mesopotamia, d: 246 BC Bab Ilu or Babylon, Mesopotamia, 77th great grandfather Seleucus II Callincus b: Abt. 235 BC Bab Ilu or Babylon, Mesopotamia, d: 225 BC Bab Ilu or Babylon, Mesopotamia, 76th great grandfather Antiochus III the Great b: 241 BC Bab Ilu or Babylon, Mesopotamia, d: 187 BC Bab Ilu or Babylon, Mesopotamia, 75th great grandfather Seleucus IV Philopator b: Abt. 155 BC Bab Ilu or Babylon, Mesopotamia, d: 175 BC Bab Ilu or Babylon, Mesopotamia, Seleucus I Nicator is the 80th great grandfather of Alfred Landon Peterson 74th great grandfather Demetrius I Soter b: 187 BC Bab Ilu or Babylon, Mesopotamia, d: 150 BC Bab Ilu or Babylon, Mesopotamia, 73rd great grandfather Demetrius II Nicator b: Abt. 125 BC Bab Ilu or Babylon, Mesopotamia, d: 125 BC Bab Ilu or Babylon, Mesopotamia, 72nd great grandfather Sanvoritcus of Syria b: 60 AD Commagene, Syrian Arab Republ d: Commagene, Syrian Arab Republ 71st great grandfather Altoy Of Turkey b: Bet. 80 AD–100 AD Mespapotamia, Turkey d: Mespapotamia, Turkey 70th great
    [Show full text]
  • Fc Omslag AAS14 V2:V2
    a contextual approach to religious aspects of rural society after the roman conquest Cult Places and Cultural Change in Republican Italy Archaeological Studies Tesse Stek Tesse Amsterdam University Press 14 Amsterdam Amsterdam Cult places and cultural change in Republican Italy 14 Editorial Board: Prof. dr. E.M. Moormann Prof. dr. W. Roebroeks Prof. dr. N. Roymans Prof. dr. F. Theuws Other titles in the series: N. Roymans (ed.): From the Sword to the Plough Three Studies on the Earliest Romanisation of Northern Gaul ISBN 90 5356 237 0 T. Derks: Gods, Temples and Ritual Practices The Transformation of Religious Ideas and Values in Roman Gaul ISBN 90 5356 254 0 A. Verhoeven: Middeleeuws gebruiksaardewerk in Nederland (8e – 13e eeuw) ISBN 90 5356 267 2 F. Theuws / N. Roymans (eds): Land and Ancestors Cultural Dynamics in the Urnfield Period and the Middle Ages in the Southern Netherlands ISBN 90 5356 278 8 J. Bazelmans: By Weapons made Worthy Lords, Retainers and Their Relationship in Beowulf ISBN 90 5356 325 3 R. Corbey / W. Roebroeks (eds): Studying Human Origins Disciplinary History and Epistemology ISBN 90 5356 464 0 M. Diepeveen-Jansen: People, Ideas and Goods New Perspectives on ‘Celtic barbarians’ in Western and Central Europe (500-250 BC) ISBN 90 5356 481 0 G. J. van Wijngaarden: Use and Appreciation of Mycenean Pottery in the Levant, Cyprus and Italy (ca. 1600-1200 BC) The Significance of Context ISBN 90 5356 482 9 F.A. Gerritsen: Local Identities Landscape and community in the late prehistoric Meuse-Demer-Scheldt region ISBN 90 5356 588 4 N.
    [Show full text]
  • “The Hellenistic Ruler Cult and Ptolemy I's Quest for Legitimacy”
    “The Hellenistic Ruler Cult and Ptolemy I’s Quest for Legitimacy” A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN CLASSICS RHODES UNIVERSITY By SIHLE NTULI DECEMEBER 2016 i Gratitude Special thanks to Daniel Malamis for helping out with the articulation of thoughts. Your hard work on this endeavour was certainly appreciated. I would also like to thank Mike Lambert and John Jackson. Thank you both for consulting on the project, I have appreciated the advice and general assistance. Finally, thanks to my mother Thandiwe Ntuli, who funded my whole year of study. I appreciate all the sacrifices you have had to make to allow me to complete my additional year. ii Abstract Alexander III died suddenly in Babylon in 323 BC. With Philip III Arrhidaeus in a mentally deficient state and Alexander IV not being of age, Alexander died without a suitable heir. The task of succeeding one of the most storied legacies in the ancient world was left to the generals of Alexander III. On his deathbed, Alexander was asked who should lead the Macedonians, of which he allegedly replied “the strongest”. Thus began the process of selecting the individual who would succeed Alexander the Great, which ended up becoming a contentious task due to Macedonian succession customs. Subsequently the ‘Successors’ quarrelled over who should succeed Alexander as the true successor. The wars of the Successors are founded on an issue of legitimacy that qualifies the notion of the strongest. Being deemed the true successor of Alexander the Great meant the opportunity to continue a period of Macedonian dominance following the reigns of Philip II and Alexander III.
    [Show full text]
  • Περίληψη : King of Thrace (Ca
    IΔΡΥΜA ΜΕΙΖΟΝΟΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ Συγγραφή : Δημητριάδου Δάφνη Μετάφραση : Νάκας Ιωάννης (19/5/2008) Για παραπομπή : Δημητριάδου Δάφνη , "Lysimachus", 2008, Εγκυκλοπαίδεια Μείζονος Ελληνισμού, Κωνσταντινούπολη URL: <http://www.ehw.gr/l.aspx?id=10251> Περίληψη : King of Thrace (ca. 323-281 BC), one of Alexander the Great's successors. He took control of Thrace and gradually extended his dominion to the Hellespont, Macedonia and Asia Minor. He was considered to be capable, but ruthless and not a particularly amiable ruler. He supported the creation and the development of urban centres mainly in Asia Minor. His decision to execute his son Agathocles caused riots in cities of Asia Minor and the intervention of Seleucus I Nikator. Τόπος και Χρόνος Γέννησης Between 361 and 351 BC - Macedonia Τόπος και Χρόνος Θανάτου February 281 BC - Korypedion (Kouropedion) Κύρια Ιδιότητα King 1. Biography Lysimachus, son of Agathocles, was born in Macedonia, but his origin was from an aristocratic family of Thessaly. His father was a close friend of Phillip II, whereas he had become a citizen of Pella and belonged to the bodyguards of Alexander III the Great.1 Lysimachus took four wives. Around 320 BC he married Nicaea, daughter of Antipatros and widow of Perdiccas. They had three or four children: his beloved son Agathocles, Arsinoe I, Eurydice and most probably another daughter. In 311 BC he asked for the hand of Cleopatra, sister of Alexander the Great, who, however, refused. In 302 BC he married Amastrida from Herakleia of Pontus, daughter of Oxyartes, niece of Darius and ex wife of Crateros, with which he did not have any offspring.2 Not many things are known about Lysimachus’third wedding apart from the fact that his wife was from Odrysia and that they had a son, Alexander.
    [Show full text]
  • Libyan (Cyrene) Royal Ancestry
    GRANHOLM GENEALOGY LIBYAN (CYRENE) ROYAL ANCESTRY Kings, 276 BC – 30 BC 1 INTRODUCTION One interesting and presently undergoing a historical change is what happens in Libya and specifically in its eastern part Cyrene right now. Its history is shown in the chart. In 440 BC, Cyrene became a Republic, under Persian suzerainty (as had been the latter kings from Arcesilaus III). See Persian Royal Ancestry for the dynasty during 550-329 B.C. Cyrene was conquered by Alexander the Great in 331 BC and fell to the portion of Ptolemy I in the division of Alexander's Empire. In 276 BC it reasserted its independence. Kings of Cyrene, 276-249 BC Magas 276 BC - 250 BC, m. Apama II Queen of Cyrenaica Daughter: Bernice II, Princess of Cyrene Her son: Ptolemy IV Philopator, King of Egypt Demetrius the Fair 250 BC - 249 BC In 249 BC Cyrene again became a republic, but was restored to Ptolemaic control in 246 BC. From 163 BC, Cyrene occasionally had its own rulers from the Ptolemaic dynasty. Kings of Cyrene, 163 BC - 30 BC Ptolemy VIII Physcon 163 BC - 116 BC Ptolemy Apion 116 BC - 96 BC Roman Republic 96 BC - 75 BC In 75 BC, the city became part of a Roman province, but it was restored to the Ptolemies by Mark Antony (65th great grandfather) in 37 BC. See Roman Early Ancestry. In 34 BC Cleopatra VII and Antony's daughter, Cleopatra Selene II, was made Queen of Cyrene, but the city returned to Rome following Augustus' conquest of Egypt in 30 BC.
    [Show full text]
  • Asian Festivals and Customs a Food Exporter’S Guide
    Asian Festivals and Customs A Food Exporter’s Guide By Grant Vinning and Kaye Crippen Asian Markets Research Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation Global Competitiveness Research and Development RIRDC Publication No 99/60 RIRDC Project No AMR-3A © 1999 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 0 642 57944 X ISSN 1440-6845 Asian Festivals and Customs: A Food Exporter’s Guide Publication No. 99/60 Project No. AMR-3A The views expressed and the conclusions reached in this publication are those of the author and not necessarily those of persons consulted. RIRDC shall not be responsible in any way whatsoever to any person who relies in whole or in part on the contents of this report. This publication is copyright. However, RIRDC encourages wide dissemination of its research, providing the Corporation is clearly acknowledged. For any other enquiries concerning reproduction, contact the Publications Manager on phone 02 6272 3186. Researcher Contact Details Grant Vinning Kaye Crippen Asian Markets Research Asian Markets Research (South East Asia) 157 Horizon Drive formerly of Singapore, and Jakarta, Indonesia WESTLAKE 4074 QUEENSLAND Phone: (07) 3376 2244 Fax: (07) 3376 7264 Email: [email protected] RIRDC Contact Details Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation Level 1, AMA House 42 Macquarie Street BARTON ACT 2600 PO Box 4776 KINGSTON ACT 2604 Phone: 02 6272 4539 Fax: 02 6272 5877 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.rirdc.gov.au Published in November 1999 Printed on environmentally friendly paper by Union Offset Foreword ii Food has always been central to human activity.
    [Show full text]