DOCSLIB.ORG

Guide for Building and Classing Floating Offshore Wind Turbines 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Guide for Building and Classing Floating Offshore Wind Turbines 2020 Guide for Building and Classing Floating Offshore Wind Turbines July 2020 GUIDE FOR BUILDING AND CLASSING FLOATING OFFSHORE WIND TURBINES JULY 2020 American Bureau of Shipping Incorporated by Act of Legislature of the State of New York 1862 © 2020 American Bureau of Shipping. All rights reserved. ABS Plaza 1701 City Plaza Drive Spring, TX 77389 USA Foreword (1 July 2020) This Guide provides criteria for the design, construction, installation and survey of permanently sited Floating Offshore Wind Turbines. It addresses three principal areas: the floating substructure, the stationkeeping system, and onboard machinery, equipment and systems including applicable marine systems and associated equipment and machinery, safety systems and associated equipment, and lifesaving appliances and machinery. The criteria applicable to bottom-founded offshore wind turbine substructures and foundations are provided in the ABS Guide for Building and Classing Bottom-Founded Offshore Wind Turbines (BOWT Guide). Requirements for ancillary offshore wind farm installations such as meteorological measuring towers, accommodation units, and transformer platforms are not addressed in this Guide. For the requirements for bottom-founded ancillary offshore wind farm installations, refer to the ABS Rules for Building and Classing Offshore Installations. The requirements applicable to floating ancillary offshore wind farm installations are provided in the ABS Rules for Building and Classing Mobile Offshore Units and the ABS Rules for Building and Classing Floating Production Installations. This revision incorporates the following changes: ● “Installations” or “Installation” as in context “Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Installations” or “Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Installation” deleted. ● 1-1/7.1 – Additional requirements for optional class notation “RNA” for the Rotor-Nacelle Assembly (RNA) and the tower added. ● 1-1/7.3 – A new mandatory class notation for “Strength Criteria for Site-specific Conditions (S)” added. ● 1-1/7.5 – New mandatory class notations for “Design Fatigue Life” added. ● 1-1/7.7 – New Subsection added to offer applicable notations listed in the ABS MOU Rules and the ABS FPI Rules upon agreement from ABS. ● 1-1/11.5 – Required design plans for the concrete floating substructure added. ● 1-1/15 – Information for wind turbine control systems and power cable system in information memorandum added. ● 1-1/19.1 – Abbreviation for “NPD” added. ● 1-1/19.2 – References for new revisions of ABS Guides and Rules, API and IEC standards, and ACI and ASTM standards for concrete structures added. ● 3-1/23 – A new Subsection for “Consideration for Identical Floating Substructure Design” added. ● 4-2/3 and 4-2/11.1– Requirements are aligned with API RP 2MET for storm wind models. ● 4-2/11 – Requirements aligned with IEC 61400-3-2 for extreme wind models. ● 4-3/1 – Requirements aligned with the IEC 61400-3-2 for consideration of swell conditions. ● 5-2/3 – Design Load Cases (DLCs) modified to incorporate the recent updates in the IEC 61400-3-1 and IEC TS 61400-3-2. ● 5-2/Table 1 – New design load cases (new DLC 2.5, DLC 2.6, DLC 9.1, 9.2, 9.3, DLC 10.1, 10.2 and DLC 10.3) added to incorporate the recent updates in the IEC 61400-3-1 and IEC TS 61400-3-2. ● 5-2/3.5 – A load case added where the tendon is designed to be subject to planned replacement. ● 6-1/7 – Additional design load cases DLC 10.1, DLC 10.2 and DLC 10.3 added for air gap analysis. ● 6-1/7 – Reference made to the ABS Guidance Notes on Air Gap and Wave Impact Analysis for Semi- Submersibles. ABS GUIDE FOR BUILDING AND CLASSING FLOATING OFFSHORE WIND TURBINES • 2020 ii ● Section 7-3 – Detailed requirements added for concrete floating substructure. ● 7-2/7.5 – The LRFD design referred to the ABS Guide for Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Criteria for Offshore Structures. ● 8-1/9 – New Subsection added to provide guidance on “Redundant Mooring System”. ● 8-5/11 – Added new Subsection is to provide guidance on “Dynamically Embedded Plate Anchor”. ● Section 8-6 – Reference is made to ABS FPI Rules for “Field Test”. ● 9-2/5.1.1 – DLC 4.1 and DLC 4.3 for normal shutdown, and DLC 5.1 for emergency stop added as design load cases to be considered in intact stability calculation. ● 9-2/5.3 – DLC 9.3 for power production and DLC 10.3 for parked condition added as required design load cases for damage stability calculation. ● 10-1/1 – Title of the Subsection changed to “General” to introduce the design requirements in Chapter 10 for machinery, equipment and systems. ● 10-1/11 – New Subsection on “Identification Marks” for Floating Offshore Wind Turbines added. ● 11-1/1 – Added survey requirements to denote when the turbine and tower are within the scope of classification. ● 11-1/5.1 – Modified requirements for installation and hook-up surveys for the RNA, tower, and power cable system. ● 11-2/1 – Added survey requirements to denote when the turbine and tower are within the scope of classification. ● 11-2/3 – A new Subsection and requirements for “In-Service Inspection Program (ISIP)” added. Referred Section for risk-based inspection in the Guide added. ● 11-2/5.5 – A new Subsection “Underwater Inspection in Lieu of Drydocking Survey (UWILD)” added. ● 11-2/17 – A new Subsection “Inspection for Concrete Structures” added. ● 11-2/19 – This Subsection replaced with new title and content in “Preparations for Safe Execution of Surveys”. ● Appendix A1 – A new Appendix added to provide guidance on wind spectra and coherence functions. ● Appendix A2 – A new Appendix added to provide guidance on tropical cyclone wind speed profile, standard deviation, turbulence intensity and gust factor. ● Various other changes are made to clarify the requirements. This Guide becomes effective on the first day of the month of publication. Users are advised to check periodically on the ABS website www.eagle.org to verify that this version of this Guide is the most current. We welcome your feedback. Comments or suggestions can be sent electronically by email to [email protected] . ABS GUIDE FOR BUILDING AND CLASSING FLOATING OFFSHORE WIND TURBINES • 2020 iii GUIDE FOR BUILDING AND CLASSING FLOATING OFFSHORE WIND TURBINES CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 Conditions of Classification............................................................... 1 Section 1 Scope and Conditions of Classification............................. 3 CHAPTER 2 Materials and Welding....................................................................... 24 Section 1 General............................................................................25 CHAPTER 3 General Design Requirements..........................................................26 Section 1 Design Considerations.....................................................27 CHAPTER 4 Environmental Conditions................................................................ 32 Section 1 Overview..........................................................................34 Section 2 Wind.................................................................................36 Section 3 Waves..............................................................................45 Section 4 Currents........................................................................... 48 Section 5 Tides, Storm Surges, and Water Levels.......................... 50 Section 6 Other Conditions..............................................................52 CHAPTER 5 Loads.................................................................................................. 55 Section 1 Overview..........................................................................57 Section 2 Design Load Conditions...................................................59 Section 3 Determination of Environmental Loads............................72 CHAPTER 6 Global Performance Analysis........................................................... 78 Section 1 General Requirements.....................................................79 Section 2 Analysis Methodologies................................................... 83 CHAPTER 7 Design of Floating Substructures.................................................... 85 Section 1 General Requirements.....................................................88 Section 2 Steel Structures............................................................... 90 Section 3 Concrete Structures.........................................................99 ABS GUIDE FOR BUILDING AND CLASSING FLOATING OFFSHORE WIND TURBINES • 2020 iv CHAPTER 8 Design of Stationkeeping Systems................................................ 111 Section 1 General ......................................................................... 113 Section 2 Design Conditions..........................................................116 Section 3 Steel Mooring and Tendon Systems.............................. 118 Section 4 Synthetic Fiber Ropes................................................... 122 Section 5 Anchor Holding Power .................................................. 124 Section 6 Field Test....................................................................... 129 CHAPTER 9 Stability and Watertight/Weathertight Integrity.............................130 Section 1 General..........................................................................131 Section 2 Stability ......................................................................... 132 Section 3 Watertight/Weathertight Integrity................................... 141 CHAPTER 10 Machinery, Equipment and Systems..............................................142
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cruise Summary
    doi: 10.25923/3rg3-d269 CRUISE SUMMARY R/V Atlantis / DSV Alvin Expedition AT-41 August 19 to September 2, 2018 for DEEP SEARCH DEEP Sea Exploration to Advance Research on Coral/Canyon/Cold seep Habitats Deepwater Atlantic Habitats II: Continued Atlantic Research and Exploration in Deepwater Ecosystems with Focus on Coral, Canyon and Seep Communities Contract - M17PC00009 Table of Contents Page 1 EXPEDITION BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................. 1 2 NOAA OER QUICK LOOK REPORT ....................................................................................................... 1 3 GENERAL DIVE PLANS .......................................................................................................................... 3 3.1 CANYONS ............................................................................................................................................................................... 3 3.2 CORALS ................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 3.3 SEEPS .................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 4 EXPEDITION ACTIVITIES-NARRATIVE ................................................................................................. 3 4.1 AUGUST 16-18: CRUISE MOBILIZATION
    [Show full text]
  • JUN 2 0 1994 Lonn ;:> (Blank Reverse)
    A DESIGN TOOL FOR THE EVALUATION OF ATMOSPHERE INDEPENDENT PROPULSION IN SUBMARINES by Grant B. Thomton, LCDR, USN B.S., Marine Engineering United States Naval Academy, 1979 SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENTS OF OCEAN ENGINEERING AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREES OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN NAVAL ARCHITECTURE AND MARINE ENGINEERING and MASTER OF SCIENCE IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY May 1994 Copyright © 1994 Grant B. Thomton The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Signatureof Author . ... -- .,/../ ~-u-_:.-.;Departments of Ocean and Mechanical Engineering May 6, 1994 Certified by Professor David Gordon Wilson Thesis Reader - . Department of Mechanical Engineering Accepted b!y "-----' PrfessA. DouglasCarmichael Thesis Advisor and Chairma0, Jepartment Committee on Graduate Students ,W1IT;.- ;,:^.-- . Department of Ocean Engineering ~:'~!'JUNi":~2 i'"'-1994 JUN 2 0 1994 Lonn_;:> (Blank Reverse) 2 A DESIGN TOOL FOR THE EVALUATION OF ATMOSPHERE INDEPENDENT PROPULSION IN SUBMARINES by Grant Blount Thornton Submitted to the Departments of Ocean Engineering and Mechanical Engineering on May 6, 1994 in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degrees of Master of Science in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering and Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering. ABSTRACT For the United States Navy, submarine propulsion has long since evolved from Diesel Electric to a complete reliance on Nuclear Power. Nuclear propulsion is the ultimate atmosphere independent power source, allowing the submarine to divorce itself from the surface, limited only by the endurance of the crew embarked.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian Northern Fleet Sources of Radioactive Contamination
    NO9600025 Bellona Report Volume 2:1996 NEI-NO--726 \ Sources of Radioactive contamination Thomas Nilsen Igor Kudrik Alexandr Nikitin BELLONA V .., I! V: NO9600025 Bellona Report Volume 2:1996 The Russian Northern Fleet Sources of Radioactive contamination Thomas Nilsen Igor Kudrik Alexandr Nikitin 2 C 1 0 1 The publication of this report is sponsored by: Stiftelsen Fritt Ord/Foundation for Freedom of Expression (Main contributor) Contributors: Norsk Hydro a.s. Petrochemicals Division NORSAS, Norwegian Resource Centre for Waste Aker ASA Management and Recycling Chemical Workers Union of Norway Norsk Sivilingeni0rers Forening Norwegian Seafood Export Council Norges ingeni0rorganisasjon (NITO) FESIL AS Green Sea Operations AS Norwegian Society of Engineers UNI STOREBRAND Confederation of Norwegian Business and Industry AGAAS WASA Forsiikring (Stockholm) OZO Hotwater A/S Norwegian Fishermen's Association Energiforsyningens Fellesorganisasjon EnFO Norwegian Federation of Oilworkers' Trade Union Store Norske Spitsbergen Kullkompani AS Norwegian Polar Institute Svalbard Samfunnsdrift AS Odda Smelteverk Norzink AS Published by: The Bellona Foundation Norway: P.O. Box 2141, Griinerl0kka N-0505 OSLO, Norway. E-mail: [email protected] Russia: Brussels: USA Russia Bellona Europa Bellona USA 183038 Murmansk 142-144 Avenue de Tervueren 310 D Street NE P.O. Box 4310 B-1150Bruxelles Washington, DC 20002 Bellona Russia Belgium USA E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] URL: Photos: Copying permitted when source is http://www.grida.no/ngo/bellona/ John Berg (archive), Thorbj0rn Bj0r- stated. kli, Per Stale Bugjerde, Nils B0hmer, ISBN 82-993138-5-6 The Norwegian Defence, Frederic Comments to this report are welco- ISSN 0806-3451 Hauge, Aleksej Klimov, Igor Kudrik, med.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUV); a Brief Summary
    The Development of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUV); A Brief Summary D. Richard Blidberg, (blidberg@ausi,org) Autonomous Undersea Systems Institute, Lee New Hampshire, USA Introduction The concept of a submersible vehicle is not a new idea. The first American submarine was called “Turtle.” It was built at Saybrook, Connecticut in 1775 by David Bushnell and his brother, Ezra. The Turtle was a little egg-shaped wooden submarine held together by iron straps. Turtle bobbed like a cork in rough surface winds and seas even though she was lead weighted at the bottom. In this hand and foot-operated contraption, one person could descend by operating a valve to admit water into the ballast tank and ascend with the use of pumps to eject the water. Two flap-type air vents at the top opened when the hatch was clear of water and closed when it was as not. The air supply lasted only 30 minutes. The Turtle's first engagement, which took place in New York Harbor in 1776, was also the first naval battle in history involving a submarine. [Pararas] In November of 1879, the Reverend George W. Garrett designed, what was considered by some to be the world's first practical powered submarine, the “Resurgam.” It was built at the Brittannia Engine Works and Foundry of J. B. Cochran in Birkenhead, England and was powered by a Lamm 'fireless' steam engine, and could travel for some ten hours on power stored in an insulated tank. After these historic underwater vehicles, there have been many more submersibles developed and used operationally for a number of different tasks.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on the Control Methods of a Water Hydraulic Variable Ballast System for Submersible Vehicles
    Ocean Engineering 108 (2015) 648–661 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ocean Engineering journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/oceaneng Study on the control methods of a water hydraulic variable ballast system for submersible vehicles Yinshui Liu a, Xufeng Zhao a, Defa Wu a,n, Donglin Li a, Xiaohui Li b a School of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No.1037, Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430074, China b Shenzhen Research Institute of Xiamen University, A600-602, Virtual University Park, South Zone of High-tech, Shenzhen, China article info abstract Article history: The water hydraulics is a competitive mechanism to adjust the ballast water and also is the only choice Received 13 January 2015 for ultra-deep sea applications. In order to improve the control performance and reduce the energy Accepted 25 August 2015 consumption of the water hydraulic variable ballast system (WHVBS), a novel type WHVBS, which Available online 18 September 2015 introduces a servo motor to drive the pump and uses four fast response direct-acting solenoid valves to Keywords: control the water flow direction, has been proposed. The proposed WHVBS has two novel flow control Variable ballast system modes: changing the speed of servo motors (pump controlled mode) or changing the opening time of Seawater hydraulics solenoid valves (valve controlled mode). The mathematical model of WHVBS was built up for the pur- Generalized predictive control pose of predicting the flow rate under both control modes. A generalized predictive controller with Pump-controlled hydraulic system forgetting factor recursive least square (FFRLSGPC) was proposed for WHVBS to improve the control On–off valve controlled hydraulic system performance.
    [Show full text]
  • 1992 RVOC Annual Meeting Summary Report
    UNIVERSITY - NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC LABORATORY SYSTEM Research Vessel Operator's Committee Summary Report of the 1992 Annual Meeting Hosted by The University of Delaware College of Marine Studies Sessions held at the Verden Center College of Marine Studies Lewes, DE CONTENTS: Minutes of the 1992 Annual Meeting APPENDICES I. Agenda II. List of Attendees III. AAUS Information and Dive Statistics - Michael Lang IV. Regulatory Update - George Ireland V. Kevlar - Larry Cleary VI. UNOLS Wire Pool and Fiber Optics - Don Moller VII. Winch Control Questionnaire - Mike Markey VIII. Coastal Marine Science Workshop - Don Wright/Jack Bash IX. Letter to UNOLS Chair and RVOC Resolution - Mike Prince X. Chronology of RVOC Meetings - Dean Letzring MINUTES OF THE 1992 ANNUAL RVOC MEETING GRADUATE COLLEGE OF MARINE STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE LEWES, DELAWARE OCTOBER 20 - 22, 1992 WELCOMING REMARKS The meeting was called to order by Chairman Jim Williams, Marine Superintendent of Scripps Institute of Oceanography. Wadsworth Owen, Director of Facilities and Services for the University of Delaware's Graduate College of Marine Studies welcomed the RVOC to Lewes after trying for over fifteen years to have the opportunity to host the meeting. He introduced Dr. Carolyn Thoroughgood, Dean of the Graduate College of Marine Studies. Dr. Thoroughgood welcomed the RVOC and gave a brief history and overview of the University of Delaware and the Graduate School of Marine Studies. AGENDA The meeting followed the Agenda outlined in Appendix I. Registered attendees are listed in Appendix II. OLD BUSINESS 1991 Meeting Minutes A motion was made, seconded and passed to accept the minutes of the 1991 meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Accidents 1945-1988, Neptune Papers No. 3
    -- Neptune Papers -- Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945 - 1988 by William M. Arkin and Joshua Handler Greenpeace/Institute for Policy Studies Washington, D.C. June 1989 Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945-1988 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Nuclear Weapons Accidents......................................................................................................... 3 Nuclear Reactor Accidents ........................................................................................................... 7 Submarine Accidents .................................................................................................................... 9 Dangers of Routine Naval Operations....................................................................................... 12 Chronology of Naval Accidents: 1945 - 1988........................................................................... 16 Appendix A: Sources and Acknowledgements........................................................................ 73 Appendix B: U.S. Ship Type Abbreviations ............................................................................ 76 Table 1: Number of Ships by Type Involved in Accidents, 1945 - 1988................................ 78 Table 2: Naval Accidents by Type
    [Show full text]
  • Optimization and Control Design of an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Ashish Palooparambil Worcester Polytechnic Institute
    Worcester Polytechnic Institute Digital WPI Major Qualifying Projects (All Years) Major Qualifying Projects April 2010 Optimization and Control Design of an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Ashish Palooparambil Worcester Polytechnic Institute Daniel S. Moussette Worcester Polytechnic Institute Jarred James Raymond Worcester Polytechnic Institute Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wpi.edu/mqp-all Repository Citation Palooparambil, A., Moussette, D. S., & Raymond, J. J. (2010). Optimization and Control Design of an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.wpi.edu/mqp-all/294 This Unrestricted is brought to you for free and open access by the Major Qualifying Projects at Digital WPI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Major Qualifying Projects (All Years) by an authorized administrator of Digital WPI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Project Number: AE- IIH-0003 Optimization and Control Design of an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle A Major Qualifying Project Report: submitted to the Faculty of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science in Aerospace Engineering by Daniel Moussette Ashish Palooparambil Jarred Raymond Date: Thursday, April 29, 2010 Approved: Professor Islam Hussein, Major Advisor Keywords Professor William Michalson, Co-Advisor 1. Autonomous 2. Submarine 3. Hydrodynamic Certain materials are included under the fair use exemption of the U.S. Copyright Law and have been prepared according to the fair use guidelines and are restricted from further use. Abstract Autonomous vehicles are increasingly being investigated for use in oceanographic studies, underwater surveillance, and search operations. Research currently being done in the area of autonomous underwater craft is often hindered by expense.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Analysis of a Variable Buoyancy System for Efficient
    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Article Design and Analysis of a Variable Buoyancy System for Efficient Hovering Control of Underwater Vehicles with State Feedback Controller Brij Kishor Tiwari and Rajiv Sharma * Design and Simulation Laboratory, Department of Ocean Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai (TN) 600036, India; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 22 February 2020; Accepted: 4 April 2020; Published: 8 April 2020 Abstract: The design process for Variable Buoyancy System (VBS) is not known in full, and existing approaches are not scalable. Furthermore, almost all the small size Autonomous Underwater Vehicles/Gliders (AUVs/G’s) use very low capacity of buoyancy change (in the range of few milliliters) and the large size AUVs require large buoyancy change. Especially for adverse weather conditions, emergency recovery or defense-related applications, higher rate of rising/sinking (heave velocity) is needed along with an ability to hover at certain depth of operation. Depth of UVs can be controlled either by changing the displaced volume or by changing the overall weight and, herein, our focus is on the later. This article presents the problem of design and analysis of VBS for efficient hovering control of underwater vehicles at desired depth using the state feedback controller. We formulate and analyze the design and analysis approach of VBS using the fundamental of mechanics, system dynamics integration and control theory. Buoyancy is controlled by changing the overall weight of the vehicle using the ballasting/de-ballasting of water in ballast tanks through the use of Positive Displacement Pump (PDP) for control in heave velocity and hovering depth.
    [Show full text]
  • Mts Muv 2017-2018
    MTS MUV 2017-2018 Manned Underwater Vehicles 2017-2018 Global Industry Overview By: William Kohnen, President Hydrospace Group Inc. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 USA Chair, Manned UW Vehicles Cmttee Marine Technology Society Date: May 17, 2018 15th Annual MUV Symposium Underwater Intervention 2018 www.mtsmuv.org MTS MUV 2017-18 Global Industry Overview Table of Contents ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 GENERAL REVIEW.......................................................................................................................................... 4 Alucia M/V (WHOI)...................................................................................................................................... 14 Aquatica Submarines, Canada .................................................................................................................... 14 Bulgaria Academy of Sciences (BAS), Bulgaria ............................................................................................ 15 China National Deep Sea Center (NDSC), P.R. China .................................................................................. 16 China Ship Scientific Research Center (CSSRC), P.R. China ......................................................................... 17 China Deep Submergence Rescue Vehicle, P.R. China ............................................................................... 18 DEEPFLIGHT, USA .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The State-Of-Art of Underwater Vehicles – Theories and Applications
    7 The State-of-Art of Underwater Vehicles – Theories and Applications W.H. Wang1, R.C. Engelaar2, X.Q. Chen1 & J.G. Chase1 1 University of Canterbury, New Zealand 2 University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands 1. Introduction An autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) is an underwater system that contains its own power and is controlled by an onboard computer. Although many names are given to these vehicles, such as remotely operated vehicles (ROVs), unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs), submersible devices, or remote controlled submarines, to name just a few, the fundamental task for these devices is fairly well defined: The vehicle is able to follow a predefined trajectory. AUVs offer many advantages for performing difficult tasks submerged in water. The main advantage of an AUV is that is does not need a human operator. Therefore it is less expensive than a human operated vehicle and is capable of doing operations that are too dangerous for a person. They operate in conditions and perform task that humans are not able to do efficiently, or at all (Smallwood & Whitcomb, 2004; Horgan & Toal, 2006; Caccia, 2006). First developed in the 1960’s, development was driven by the demand from the US Navy (Wernli, 2001), which required them to perform deep sea rescue and salvage operations. In the 1970s, universities, institutes and governmental organizations started with the experimentation with AUV technology. Some of them were successful, most were not. Despite this, there was significant advancement in the development of AUVs. Since then, other sectors have realized the potential of such devices for all manner of tasks.
    [Show full text]
  • From Accompanying Fishes in the Deep Sea to Releasing a Torpedo to Defeat Enemies When Necessary, She Is a Mystery of All Time
    SUBMARINE From accompanying fishes in the deep sea to releasing a torpedo to defeat enemies when necessary, she is a mystery of all time. She is none other than the submarine. More than twenty centuries ago, the King of Macedonia of ancient Greece – Alexander the Great, had instructed the construction of a cylindrical-shaped fine barrel made entirely of white glass so that he could enter the glass case and lowered to see the underwater world. This could be the earliest concept ever recorded about underwater vehicles. Later, others have tried to modify normal boats by installing a completely enclosed water-proof compartment in the center of the boats. To submerge a boat, rocks or lead pieces which increased the boat’s load were used. To make the boat resurface from underwater, the loads were discarded from the boat. Nonetheless, the boat could not move forward or backward in the water due to the lack of mechanical power. Thus, the theory of relative diving and surfacing is proven to be an important basis for all future research on submarines. SUBMARINE In 1620, a Dutch physicist named Cornelis Drebbel devised the world’s first navigable submersible, which could contain 12 sailors working together to row the craft. The steerable submersible was manufactured with a leather-covered wooden frame, while the inner craft contained a water tanker built with sheepskin. The water level of the tanker was increased or decreased in order to adjust the buoyancy of the craft. This submersible was perceived as the world’s most primitive submarine model. At the end of the 18th century, an Irish American named Robert Fulton built a submarine called ‘Nautilus’.
    [Show full text]