JUN 2 0 1994 Lonn ;:> (Blank Reverse)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

JUN 2 0 1994 Lonn ;:> (Blank Reverse) A DESIGN TOOL FOR THE EVALUATION OF ATMOSPHERE INDEPENDENT PROPULSION IN SUBMARINES by Grant B. Thomton, LCDR, USN B.S., Marine Engineering United States Naval Academy, 1979 SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENTS OF OCEAN ENGINEERING AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREES OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN NAVAL ARCHITECTURE AND MARINE ENGINEERING and MASTER OF SCIENCE IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY May 1994 Copyright © 1994 Grant B. Thomton The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Signatureof Author . ... -- .,/../ ~-u-_:.-.;Departments of Ocean and Mechanical Engineering May 6, 1994 Certified by Professor David Gordon Wilson Thesis Reader - . Department of Mechanical Engineering Accepted b!y "-----' PrfessA. DouglasCarmichael Thesis Advisor and Chairma0, Jepartment Committee on Graduate Students ,W1IT;.- ;,:^.-- . Department of Ocean Engineering ~:'~!'JUNi":~2 i'"'-1994 JUN 2 0 1994 Lonn_;:> (Blank Reverse) 2 A DESIGN TOOL FOR THE EVALUATION OF ATMOSPHERE INDEPENDENT PROPULSION IN SUBMARINES by Grant Blount Thornton Submitted to the Departments of Ocean Engineering and Mechanical Engineering on May 6, 1994 in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degrees of Master of Science in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering and Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering. ABSTRACT For the United States Navy, submarine propulsion has long since evolved from Diesel Electric to a complete reliance on Nuclear Power. Nuclear propulsion is the ultimate atmosphere independent power source, allowing the submarine to divorce itself from the surface, limited only by the endurance of the crew embarked. Submarine construction and operating costs have grown dramatically, due largely to the cost of the high performance nuclear propulsion plant. Other options exist to provide Atmosphere Independent Propulsion of similar capability for extended underwater periods at a potentially lower cost. This thesis explores the aspects of non-nuclear atmosphere independent propulsion as an integral part of the submarine design process, focusing on methods for power generation and various options for fuel and oxidant storage. Fuel sources include pure hydrogen, stored cryogenically or in metal hydrides, or more common fuels such as diesel or methanol, used either directly or in a reformed state. Oxidants include pure oxygen, stored cryogenically or in compressed form, as well as hydrogen peroxide and sodium perchlorate. Energy conversion methods examined include mechanical such as closed cycle diesels, Brayton cycles and Stirling engines, to electro-chemical designs, such as fuel cells and aluminum oxygen semi- cells. A computer code was written which integrates these propulsion options with mission and owner's requirements to provide a balanced design in terms of matching the weights and volumes of the equipment installed. This code will serve as a tool for the concept design of non-nuclear air independent submarines. Thesis Supervisor: A. Douglas Carmichael, Professor of Ocean Engineering Thesis Reader: David Gordon Wilson, Professor of Mechanical Engineering 3 (Blank Reverse) 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to acknowledge the following persons who aided me in my search for reference material: Dave Bagley NSWC Annapolis Mark Cervi NSWC Annapolis Henry DeRonck International Fuel Cells LCDR Norbert Doerry NAVSEA Richard Martin Draper Laboratory Warren Reid NSWC Annapolis Ed Robinson NAVSEA PEO SUB-R Steve Sinsabaugh LORAL Defense Industries LT Cliff Whitcomb NSWC Carderock I hope that I have correctly interpreted the information that you made available to me. I am grateful for the counsel in ship and submarine design provided by Professors Alan Brown and Jeff Reed in the Naval Construction and Engineering Program at MIT. I wish to thank my Thesis Advisor, Professor A. D. Carmichael who inspired me to investigate the realm of Air Independent Propulsion as a student, who stood by me as I worked to put my research together in an orderly fashion, and who taught me to be aware of the salesman and the customer when evaluating data. But most of all, I am thankful for the love and understanding of my family; Daryl, David and Megan, as I complete my studies at MIT. 5 (Blank Reverse) 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS 7 LIST OF FIGURES . 13 LIST OF TABLES 17 CHAPTER ONE 1.0 Introduction 19 1.1 History 19 1.2 Air Independence Concept 20 1.3 Propulsion Options 21 1.4 Thesis Objective 21 CHAPTER TWO 2.0 The Design Process 25 2.1 Mission Requirements. 27 2.2 Required Operational Capabilities 29 2.3 Submarine Hull Synthesis 33 CHAPTER THREE 3.0 Submarine Systems 37 3.1 Propulsion Integration . 38 3.1.1 Conventional DC 38 3.1.2 Permanent Magnet AC 40 3.1.3 Superconducting Homopolar DC 42 3.1.4 Propulsors 44 3.2 Ship Service Power Requirements 44 3.3 Auxiliary Systems 46 3.4 Atmosphere Control 46 CHAPTER FOUR 4.0 Power Sources . 51 4.1 Electro-Chemical Concepts 52 4.1.1 Fuel Cells 52 4.1.1.1 Proton Exch. Membrane Fuel Cells 54 4.1.1.2 Alkaline Fuel Cells 57 4.1.1.3 Phosphoric Acid Fuel Cells 57 4.1.1.4 Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell 58 4.1.1.5 Solid Oxide Fuel Cell 60 4.1.1.6 Direct Methanol Oxidation Fuel Cell 60 4.1.2 Aluminum Oxygen Semi-Cell 62 4.1.3 Batteries 64 4.1.3.1 Lead Acid Batteries 65 4.1 .3.2 Nickel-Cadmium Batteries 68 7 (Blank Reverse) 8 4.1.3.3 Silver-Zinc . .70 4.1.3.4 Lithium-Aliminum / Iron Sulfide 72 4.2 Mechanical Power Sources 74 4.2.1 Closed Cycle Engines 74 4.2.1.1 Closed Cycle Diesel 74 4.2.1.2 Closed Brayton Cycle 77 4.2.2 Stirling Engine 79 4.2.3 Other Power Cycles. .. 80 4.2.3.1 Rankine Cycle 81 4.2.3.2 Small Nuclear Power 83 4.2.3.3 Walter Cycle 83 CHAPTER FIVE 5.0 Reactants 87 5.1 Fuels 88 5.1.1 Hydrogen 88 5.1.1.1 Hydrogen - Gaseous Storage 89 5.1.1.2 Hydrogen - Cryogenic Storage 89 5.1.1.3 Hydrogen - Metal Hydride 90 5.1.1.4 Hydrogen - By Reformation 92 5.1.2 Other Fuels 94 5.2 Oxidants. 95 5.2.1 Oxygen 95 5.2.1.1 Oxygen - Gaseous Storage 95 5.2.1.2 Oxygen - Cryogenic Storage 96 5.2.1.3 Oxygen - Chemical Reformation. 98 5.2.1.4 Oxygen - Generation Onboard . 99 5.2.2 High Test Hydrogen Peroxide 99 5.3 Waste Products 101 CHAPTER SIX 6.0 The Submarine Model. 105 6.1 Hull Envelope . 106 6.2 Volume Estimates 107 6.2.1 Pressure Hull Volume 107 6.2.1.1 Mobility Volume 107 6.2.1.2 Weapons and C31 Volume 108 6.2.1.3 Ship Support Volume 108 6.2.2 Other Volumes 109 6.3 Weight Estimates 110 6.3.1 Surfaced Displacement 111 6.3.1.1 Structural Weight . 111 6.3.1.2 Mobility Weight 111 6.3.1.3 Weapons and C31Weight 112 6.3.1.4 Ship Support Weight 112 6.3.1.5 Fixed Ballast and Variable Load Wt 113 9 (Blank Reverse) 10 6.4 Powering and Edurance 114 6.4.1 Powering 114 6.4.1.1 Hydrodynamics 114 6.4.1.2 Propulsion Motor Turndown 117 6.4.2 Snort Power and Bunker Fuel Calculation 117 6.4.3 Hotel Loads 118 6.4.4 Battery Endurance 119 6.5 The AIP Plant 120 CHAPTER SEVEN 7.0 Computer Code Development 121 7.1 Overview 121 CHAPTER EIGHT 8.0 Results and Conclusions 125 8.1 Model Validation 125 8.2 General Results 127 8.2.1 Overall AIP Impact 128 8.2.2 Impact of Reactants . 130 8.2.3 Impact of Other Technologies 132 8.3 Ship Trade-offs. 135 CHAPTER NINE 9.0 Areas for Future Study 139 REFERENCES 141 APPENDIX A - POWER SOURCE DOCUMENTATION 147 APPENDIX B - REACTANT DOCUMENTATION 163 APPENDIX C - BASELINE MODEL 175 APPENDIX D - HULL ENVELOPE 191 APPENDIX E - VOLUME DATA BASE 195 APPENDIX F - WEIGHT DATA BASE 201 APPENDIX G - SNORKEL POWERING 205 APPENDIX H - RESULT DATA TABLES. 207 APPENDIX I - COMPUTER CODE 211 11 (Blank Reverse) 12 LIST OF FIGURES 2.1 Acquisition Milestones and Phases 26 2.2 The Design Spiral . 27 2.3 Balancing Weights and Volumes . 35 3.1 Battery Stepping Operating Modes for a Double Armature DC Mtr 39 3.2 Permanent Magnet Axial Gap Propulsion Motor 40 3.3 Permanent Magnet High Speed Generator 41 3.4 Example of Chopped AC Output from Input DC. 42 3.5 Superconducting Homopolar DC Motor . 43 3.6 Typical Ship Service Distribution System 45 3.7 Hydraulic System with Typical Loads 47 3.8 High Pressure Air System . 47 3.9 Ventilation Arrangement 49 4.1 Efficiency vs. Load for AIP Options 53 4.2 Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell 55 4.3 PEM Cell Voltage vs. Cell Load 56 4.4 Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell 59 4.5 Westinghouse Solid Oxide Fuel Cell 61 4.6 Aluminum Oxygen Semi-Cell 63 4.7 Lead Acid Battery Schematic 67 4.8 Typical Lead Acid Discharge Characteristics 67 4.9 Nickel-Cadmium Discharge Characteristics 70 4.10 Silver Zinc Discharge Characteristics 72 4.11 LAIS Battery Discharge Characteristics . 74 4.12 Closed Cycle Diesel with Exhaust Management System 76 4.13 Closed Brayton Cycle Combustion Power System 78 4.14 Closed Brayton Cycle Schematic Flow Diagram 79 4.15 Stirling Operating Cycle 81 4.16 MESMA Operating Cycle . 82 4.17 AMPS Power Cycle.
Recommended publications
  • Cruise Summary
    doi: 10.25923/3rg3-d269 CRUISE SUMMARY R/V Atlantis / DSV Alvin Expedition AT-41 August 19 to September 2, 2018 for DEEP SEARCH DEEP Sea Exploration to Advance Research on Coral/Canyon/Cold seep Habitats Deepwater Atlantic Habitats II: Continued Atlantic Research and Exploration in Deepwater Ecosystems with Focus on Coral, Canyon and Seep Communities Contract - M17PC00009 Table of Contents Page 1 EXPEDITION BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................. 1 2 NOAA OER QUICK LOOK REPORT ....................................................................................................... 1 3 GENERAL DIVE PLANS .......................................................................................................................... 3 3.1 CANYONS ............................................................................................................................................................................... 3 3.2 CORALS ................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 3.3 SEEPS .................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 4 EXPEDITION ACTIVITIES-NARRATIVE ................................................................................................. 3 4.1 AUGUST 16-18: CRUISE MOBILIZATION
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian Northern Fleet Sources of Radioactive Contamination
    NO9600025 Bellona Report Volume 2:1996 NEI-NO--726 \ Sources of Radioactive contamination Thomas Nilsen Igor Kudrik Alexandr Nikitin BELLONA V .., I! V: NO9600025 Bellona Report Volume 2:1996 The Russian Northern Fleet Sources of Radioactive contamination Thomas Nilsen Igor Kudrik Alexandr Nikitin 2 C 1 0 1 The publication of this report is sponsored by: Stiftelsen Fritt Ord/Foundation for Freedom of Expression (Main contributor) Contributors: Norsk Hydro a.s. Petrochemicals Division NORSAS, Norwegian Resource Centre for Waste Aker ASA Management and Recycling Chemical Workers Union of Norway Norsk Sivilingeni0rers Forening Norwegian Seafood Export Council Norges ingeni0rorganisasjon (NITO) FESIL AS Green Sea Operations AS Norwegian Society of Engineers UNI STOREBRAND Confederation of Norwegian Business and Industry AGAAS WASA Forsiikring (Stockholm) OZO Hotwater A/S Norwegian Fishermen's Association Energiforsyningens Fellesorganisasjon EnFO Norwegian Federation of Oilworkers' Trade Union Store Norske Spitsbergen Kullkompani AS Norwegian Polar Institute Svalbard Samfunnsdrift AS Odda Smelteverk Norzink AS Published by: The Bellona Foundation Norway: P.O. Box 2141, Griinerl0kka N-0505 OSLO, Norway. E-mail: [email protected] Russia: Brussels: USA Russia Bellona Europa Bellona USA 183038 Murmansk 142-144 Avenue de Tervueren 310 D Street NE P.O. Box 4310 B-1150Bruxelles Washington, DC 20002 Bellona Russia Belgium USA E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] URL: Photos: Copying permitted when source is http://www.grida.no/ngo/bellona/ John Berg (archive), Thorbj0rn Bj0r- stated. kli, Per Stale Bugjerde, Nils B0hmer, ISBN 82-993138-5-6 The Norwegian Defence, Frederic Comments to this report are welco- ISSN 0806-3451 Hauge, Aleksej Klimov, Igor Kudrik, med.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUV); a Brief Summary
    The Development of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUV); A Brief Summary D. Richard Blidberg, (blidberg@ausi,org) Autonomous Undersea Systems Institute, Lee New Hampshire, USA Introduction The concept of a submersible vehicle is not a new idea. The first American submarine was called “Turtle.” It was built at Saybrook, Connecticut in 1775 by David Bushnell and his brother, Ezra. The Turtle was a little egg-shaped wooden submarine held together by iron straps. Turtle bobbed like a cork in rough surface winds and seas even though she was lead weighted at the bottom. In this hand and foot-operated contraption, one person could descend by operating a valve to admit water into the ballast tank and ascend with the use of pumps to eject the water. Two flap-type air vents at the top opened when the hatch was clear of water and closed when it was as not. The air supply lasted only 30 minutes. The Turtle's first engagement, which took place in New York Harbor in 1776, was also the first naval battle in history involving a submarine. [Pararas] In November of 1879, the Reverend George W. Garrett designed, what was considered by some to be the world's first practical powered submarine, the “Resurgam.” It was built at the Brittannia Engine Works and Foundry of J. B. Cochran in Birkenhead, England and was powered by a Lamm 'fireless' steam engine, and could travel for some ten hours on power stored in an insulated tank. After these historic underwater vehicles, there have been many more submersibles developed and used operationally for a number of different tasks.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on the Control Methods of a Water Hydraulic Variable Ballast System for Submersible Vehicles
    Ocean Engineering 108 (2015) 648–661 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ocean Engineering journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/oceaneng Study on the control methods of a water hydraulic variable ballast system for submersible vehicles Yinshui Liu a, Xufeng Zhao a, Defa Wu a,n, Donglin Li a, Xiaohui Li b a School of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No.1037, Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430074, China b Shenzhen Research Institute of Xiamen University, A600-602, Virtual University Park, South Zone of High-tech, Shenzhen, China article info abstract Article history: The water hydraulics is a competitive mechanism to adjust the ballast water and also is the only choice Received 13 January 2015 for ultra-deep sea applications. In order to improve the control performance and reduce the energy Accepted 25 August 2015 consumption of the water hydraulic variable ballast system (WHVBS), a novel type WHVBS, which Available online 18 September 2015 introduces a servo motor to drive the pump and uses four fast response direct-acting solenoid valves to Keywords: control the water flow direction, has been proposed. The proposed WHVBS has two novel flow control Variable ballast system modes: changing the speed of servo motors (pump controlled mode) or changing the opening time of Seawater hydraulics solenoid valves (valve controlled mode). The mathematical model of WHVBS was built up for the pur- Generalized predictive control pose of predicting the flow rate under both control modes. A generalized predictive controller with Pump-controlled hydraulic system forgetting factor recursive least square (FFRLSGPC) was proposed for WHVBS to improve the control On–off valve controlled hydraulic system performance.
    [Show full text]
  • 1992 RVOC Annual Meeting Summary Report
    UNIVERSITY - NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC LABORATORY SYSTEM Research Vessel Operator's Committee Summary Report of the 1992 Annual Meeting Hosted by The University of Delaware College of Marine Studies Sessions held at the Verden Center College of Marine Studies Lewes, DE CONTENTS: Minutes of the 1992 Annual Meeting APPENDICES I. Agenda II. List of Attendees III. AAUS Information and Dive Statistics - Michael Lang IV. Regulatory Update - George Ireland V. Kevlar - Larry Cleary VI. UNOLS Wire Pool and Fiber Optics - Don Moller VII. Winch Control Questionnaire - Mike Markey VIII. Coastal Marine Science Workshop - Don Wright/Jack Bash IX. Letter to UNOLS Chair and RVOC Resolution - Mike Prince X. Chronology of RVOC Meetings - Dean Letzring MINUTES OF THE 1992 ANNUAL RVOC MEETING GRADUATE COLLEGE OF MARINE STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE LEWES, DELAWARE OCTOBER 20 - 22, 1992 WELCOMING REMARKS The meeting was called to order by Chairman Jim Williams, Marine Superintendent of Scripps Institute of Oceanography. Wadsworth Owen, Director of Facilities and Services for the University of Delaware's Graduate College of Marine Studies welcomed the RVOC to Lewes after trying for over fifteen years to have the opportunity to host the meeting. He introduced Dr. Carolyn Thoroughgood, Dean of the Graduate College of Marine Studies. Dr. Thoroughgood welcomed the RVOC and gave a brief history and overview of the University of Delaware and the Graduate School of Marine Studies. AGENDA The meeting followed the Agenda outlined in Appendix I. Registered attendees are listed in Appendix II. OLD BUSINESS 1991 Meeting Minutes A motion was made, seconded and passed to accept the minutes of the 1991 meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Accidents 1945-1988, Neptune Papers No. 3
    -- Neptune Papers -- Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945 - 1988 by William M. Arkin and Joshua Handler Greenpeace/Institute for Policy Studies Washington, D.C. June 1989 Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945-1988 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Nuclear Weapons Accidents......................................................................................................... 3 Nuclear Reactor Accidents ........................................................................................................... 7 Submarine Accidents .................................................................................................................... 9 Dangers of Routine Naval Operations....................................................................................... 12 Chronology of Naval Accidents: 1945 - 1988........................................................................... 16 Appendix A: Sources and Acknowledgements........................................................................ 73 Appendix B: U.S. Ship Type Abbreviations ............................................................................ 76 Table 1: Number of Ships by Type Involved in Accidents, 1945 - 1988................................ 78 Table 2: Naval Accidents by Type
    [Show full text]
  • Optimization and Control Design of an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Ashish Palooparambil Worcester Polytechnic Institute
    Worcester Polytechnic Institute Digital WPI Major Qualifying Projects (All Years) Major Qualifying Projects April 2010 Optimization and Control Design of an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Ashish Palooparambil Worcester Polytechnic Institute Daniel S. Moussette Worcester Polytechnic Institute Jarred James Raymond Worcester Polytechnic Institute Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wpi.edu/mqp-all Repository Citation Palooparambil, A., Moussette, D. S., & Raymond, J. J. (2010). Optimization and Control Design of an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.wpi.edu/mqp-all/294 This Unrestricted is brought to you for free and open access by the Major Qualifying Projects at Digital WPI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Major Qualifying Projects (All Years) by an authorized administrator of Digital WPI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Project Number: AE- IIH-0003 Optimization and Control Design of an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle A Major Qualifying Project Report: submitted to the Faculty of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science in Aerospace Engineering by Daniel Moussette Ashish Palooparambil Jarred Raymond Date: Thursday, April 29, 2010 Approved: Professor Islam Hussein, Major Advisor Keywords Professor William Michalson, Co-Advisor 1. Autonomous 2. Submarine 3. Hydrodynamic Certain materials are included under the fair use exemption of the U.S. Copyright Law and have been prepared according to the fair use guidelines and are restricted from further use. Abstract Autonomous vehicles are increasingly being investigated for use in oceanographic studies, underwater surveillance, and search operations. Research currently being done in the area of autonomous underwater craft is often hindered by expense.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Analysis of a Variable Buoyancy System for Efficient
    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Article Design and Analysis of a Variable Buoyancy System for Efficient Hovering Control of Underwater Vehicles with State Feedback Controller Brij Kishor Tiwari and Rajiv Sharma * Design and Simulation Laboratory, Department of Ocean Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai (TN) 600036, India; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 22 February 2020; Accepted: 4 April 2020; Published: 8 April 2020 Abstract: The design process for Variable Buoyancy System (VBS) is not known in full, and existing approaches are not scalable. Furthermore, almost all the small size Autonomous Underwater Vehicles/Gliders (AUVs/G’s) use very low capacity of buoyancy change (in the range of few milliliters) and the large size AUVs require large buoyancy change. Especially for adverse weather conditions, emergency recovery or defense-related applications, higher rate of rising/sinking (heave velocity) is needed along with an ability to hover at certain depth of operation. Depth of UVs can be controlled either by changing the displaced volume or by changing the overall weight and, herein, our focus is on the later. This article presents the problem of design and analysis of VBS for efficient hovering control of underwater vehicles at desired depth using the state feedback controller. We formulate and analyze the design and analysis approach of VBS using the fundamental of mechanics, system dynamics integration and control theory. Buoyancy is controlled by changing the overall weight of the vehicle using the ballasting/de-ballasting of water in ballast tanks through the use of Positive Displacement Pump (PDP) for control in heave velocity and hovering depth.
    [Show full text]
  • Mts Muv 2017-2018
    MTS MUV 2017-2018 Manned Underwater Vehicles 2017-2018 Global Industry Overview By: William Kohnen, President Hydrospace Group Inc. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 USA Chair, Manned UW Vehicles Cmttee Marine Technology Society Date: May 17, 2018 15th Annual MUV Symposium Underwater Intervention 2018 www.mtsmuv.org MTS MUV 2017-18 Global Industry Overview Table of Contents ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 GENERAL REVIEW.......................................................................................................................................... 4 Alucia M/V (WHOI)...................................................................................................................................... 14 Aquatica Submarines, Canada .................................................................................................................... 14 Bulgaria Academy of Sciences (BAS), Bulgaria ............................................................................................ 15 China National Deep Sea Center (NDSC), P.R. China .................................................................................. 16 China Ship Scientific Research Center (CSSRC), P.R. China ......................................................................... 17 China Deep Submergence Rescue Vehicle, P.R. China ............................................................................... 18 DEEPFLIGHT, USA .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The State-Of-Art of Underwater Vehicles – Theories and Applications
    7 The State-of-Art of Underwater Vehicles – Theories and Applications W.H. Wang1, R.C. Engelaar2, X.Q. Chen1 & J.G. Chase1 1 University of Canterbury, New Zealand 2 University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands 1. Introduction An autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) is an underwater system that contains its own power and is controlled by an onboard computer. Although many names are given to these vehicles, such as remotely operated vehicles (ROVs), unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs), submersible devices, or remote controlled submarines, to name just a few, the fundamental task for these devices is fairly well defined: The vehicle is able to follow a predefined trajectory. AUVs offer many advantages for performing difficult tasks submerged in water. The main advantage of an AUV is that is does not need a human operator. Therefore it is less expensive than a human operated vehicle and is capable of doing operations that are too dangerous for a person. They operate in conditions and perform task that humans are not able to do efficiently, or at all (Smallwood & Whitcomb, 2004; Horgan & Toal, 2006; Caccia, 2006). First developed in the 1960’s, development was driven by the demand from the US Navy (Wernli, 2001), which required them to perform deep sea rescue and salvage operations. In the 1970s, universities, institutes and governmental organizations started with the experimentation with AUV technology. Some of them were successful, most were not. Despite this, there was significant advancement in the development of AUVs. Since then, other sectors have realized the potential of such devices for all manner of tasks.
    [Show full text]
  • From Accompanying Fishes in the Deep Sea to Releasing a Torpedo to Defeat Enemies When Necessary, She Is a Mystery of All Time
    SUBMARINE From accompanying fishes in the deep sea to releasing a torpedo to defeat enemies when necessary, she is a mystery of all time. She is none other than the submarine. More than twenty centuries ago, the King of Macedonia of ancient Greece – Alexander the Great, had instructed the construction of a cylindrical-shaped fine barrel made entirely of white glass so that he could enter the glass case and lowered to see the underwater world. This could be the earliest concept ever recorded about underwater vehicles. Later, others have tried to modify normal boats by installing a completely enclosed water-proof compartment in the center of the boats. To submerge a boat, rocks or lead pieces which increased the boat’s load were used. To make the boat resurface from underwater, the loads were discarded from the boat. Nonetheless, the boat could not move forward or backward in the water due to the lack of mechanical power. Thus, the theory of relative diving and surfacing is proven to be an important basis for all future research on submarines. SUBMARINE In 1620, a Dutch physicist named Cornelis Drebbel devised the world’s first navigable submersible, which could contain 12 sailors working together to row the craft. The steerable submersible was manufactured with a leather-covered wooden frame, while the inner craft contained a water tanker built with sheepskin. The water level of the tanker was increased or decreased in order to adjust the buoyancy of the craft. This submersible was perceived as the world’s most primitive submarine model. At the end of the 18th century, an Irish American named Robert Fulton built a submarine called ‘Nautilus’.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Execution Plan (PEP) Describes How WHOI Will Manage This Project During Stage 1, and Provides Order of Magnitude Estimates to Achieve Stage 2 of the Project
    6500m HOV Project Stage 1: A-4500 HOV Project Execution Plan Document Control No.: 0000000 10-November-2009 Document Control Sheet Date Originator Description 08-29-09 S. Humphris Initial Draft 09-05-09 S. Humphris Rev: Edits by C. German, D. Fornari 11-10-09 S. Humphris Edits by C. Van Dover A-4500 HOV Project i Project Execution Pan Table of Contents Page Document Control Sheet i Table of Contents ii Executive Summary 1 1.0 Introduction and Background to the 6500m HOV Project 2 1.1 Community Activity Towards a New 6500m HOV 3 2.0 Science Mission Requirements 5 2.1 Unique Capabilities of Human-Occupied Vehicles 5 2.2 Future Science Missions 8 2.3 Capacity for Education, Outreach and Recruitment 15 2.4 Expected Science Capabilities of the 6500m HOV 15 2.5 Mapping Science Requirements to Technical Requirements 17 3.0 Progress to Date 19 3.1 NSF-WHOI Cooperative Agreement 19 3.2 Construction of the Personnel Sphere 20 3.3 Lessons from the Lockheed-Martin Contract 22 4.0 Vehicle Design and Construction 24 4.1 General Approach 24 4.1.1 Other Requirements 24 4.1.2 Systems Engineering 25 4.1.3 Analysis of Alternatives 26 4.2 Vehicle Design 36 4.3 A-4500 HOV Construction Plan 36 4.3.1 Pre-construction Procurement and Fabrication 37 4.3.2 Demobilization and Disassembly of Alvin 38 4.3.3 Refurbishment, Servicing and New Construction 38 4.3.4 Assembly of the A-4500 HOV 39 4.3.5 High Bay Testing and Remobilization 38 4.4 A-4500 HOV ABS Classification Plan 39 5.0 Project Management 41 5.1 Organizational Structure 41 5.2 Internal Advisory Structure
    [Show full text]