Village De L'est Neighborhood, Planning District

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Village De L'est Neighborhood, Planning District Village de L’est Neighborhood Planning District 10 Rebuilding Plan Village de L’Est Neighborhood, Planning District Ten Introduction Table of Contents Approximately 100 days after Hurricane Katrina Planning District 10 is the subject of the Acknowledgements A. Village de L’Est Neighborhood 3 struck, Motion M-05-592 was unanimously following report. With grateful appreciation the Planning team Location and History 3 passed by the City Council of New Orleans. would like to thank the residents of District 10, Recovery Vision and Goals 4 This motion ensured that community-based, Basic assumptions also formed the basis who participated in this planning process and Planning Process and Neighborhood Participation 5 neighborhood-by-neighborhood planning for the Planning District 10 Recovery Plan: without whom this effort would not have been Planning Efforts Pre-Hurricane Katrina 6 would be central to decisions associated with possible. the recovery of the most devastated areas of 1) That a flood protection system B. Pre-Hurricane Katrina Neighborhood New Orleans. The City Council was adamant will be designed to withstand future Project Directory Existing Conditions 9 that the people most impacted by the storm catastrophic loss from a 1 in 100 year Land Use and Zoning 9 would play a central role in defining the future storm and that this is a commitment by City of New Orleans Pre-Katrina Demographic Profile 9 of their communities. Overall, 47 of the 73 the Federal Government; C. Ray Nagin, Mayor Recreation and Open Space 11 neighborhoods delineated by the City’s 2) That stringent building codes New Orleans City Council: Roadway Hierarchy and Jurisdiction 11 Planning Commission have had plans prepared will be implemented to further limit wind Oliver M. Thomas, President Housing, Architecture and Historic Preservation 12 as part of this process. damage; 3) That the basic urban structure Arnie Fielkow, Vice-President Shelley Midura, District A C. Hurricane Katrina Neighborhood Impacts 15 The City Council charged a team of consultants of the city is sound and that rebuilding Stacy S. Head, District B Extent of Flooding 15 overseen by Lambert Advisory & SHEDO with will respect this structure; James Carter, District C Damage Assessment assisting neighborhoods flooded by Hurricane 4)That there is an organized, Cynthia Hedge-Morrell, District D Residential Properties Damage Assessment 15 Katrina in developing revitalization plans that coherent and operable Hurricane Cynthia Willard-Lewis, District E Commercial Properties Damage Assessment 15 are thoughtful and can be implemented, for Evacuation Program. Infrastructure Damage Assessment 16 incorporation into a citywide recovery and Parks and Open Space Damage Assessment 17 improvement plan to be submitted to the State Project Management: Community Facilities 17 of Louisiana and federal funding agencies. This Lambert Advisory, LLC Schools and Universities 17 document is one of forty-two (42) Paul Lambert neighborhood plans that meet that mandate. SHEDO, LLC D. Neighborhood Rebuilding Scenarios 19 Shelia Danzey Neighborhood Re-population 20 City Planning Commission: 2 Planning District Overall Planning Consultant: E. Neighborhood Recovery Plan 21 Designations Bermello-Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Strategic Initiatives 21 Alfredo C. Sanchez, AIA, AICP Plan Elements Key Recovery and Development Projects 24 Hewitt-Washington, Inc. Land Use and Zoning 25 Lonnie Hewitt, AIA Parks, Open Space and Landscape Architecture 26 Transportation and Public Transit 26 Neighborhood Planner: Housing, Architecture and Historic Preservation 26 St. Martin - Brown & Associates, LLP Utilities and Municipal Services 26 Joseph St. Martin Human Services and Community Facilities 26 Deron Brown F. Neighborhood Planning Initiative 27 G. Implementation and Funding Strategies 33 Cover Images left to right: A: Drawings - Redevelopment of the Versailles Business District B: Canoeing along Bayou Sauvage C: Six Flags New Orleans - Batman Ride City of New Orleans Neighborhoods Rebuilding Plan A. Village de L’Est Neighborhood Location and History recognized chain of amusement parks. Bayou Savage, which adjoins the built areas The Village de l’Est Neighborhood of the neighborhood, is a 20,000-acre wildlife encompasses the entire area of Planning refugee that is home to American bald eagles District 10. Village de l’Est is bordered by and American alligators. Paris Road / I-510 to the west, Chef Menteur Highway to the south, Lake Pontchartrain to Many of the neighborhood’s assets were the north, and US Highway 11 to the east. greatly devastated by the flood waters and The following neighborhoods and catastrophic winds of Hurricane Katrina. subdivisions are included: • Oak Island I 3 • Oak Island II • Willowbrook • Village de l’Est The history of development dates back to 1763 when the King of France gave the area as a land grant to Gilbert Antoine de St. Maxent. Over the years the neighborhood passed through many different owners, but it wasn’t until the early 1960’s that major development began. In 1964, a 600-acre tract was developed with single-family and double-residential structures. It began primarily as a largely African-American neighborhood but since then thousands of Vietnamese immigrants settled in the area. Even through a slowing of the economy during the 1980’s there was an increase in population within the neighborhood. The Village de l’Est area features several churches, schools and commercial At right: Neighborhood Boundary Maps - developments. The area is home to Six Flags Village de L’Est Neighborhood New Orleans. Six Flags is a nationally Village de L’Est Neighborhood, Planning District Ten • Oak Island I • Oak Island II • Willowbrook • Village de l’Est Recovery Vision and Goals the character Village de l’Est is preserved. The plan will provide a list of projects to be The Neighborhoods Rebuilding Plan provides a implemented in the early, mid-, and long-term 4 vision and framework for physical recovery phases. The projects identified shall improvements, economic sustainability and serve as catalysts for the rebuilding of the community enhancements for the Village de community. The goal for the Recovery Plan is to L’est Neighborhood. carefully identify projects that can be leveraged to benefit the community as a whole, such as: Vision • Improve and enhance the existing streets, sidewalks and infrastructure system serving The vision of the Neighborhood Recovery Plan Village de l’Est; is to restore the quality of life in Village de l’Est to the level that existed prior to Hurricane • Provide attractive residential options; Katrina plus make key improvements to the quality of life in the neighborhood by • Maintain and enhance the predominantly addressing concentrations of high-density single-family character of Village de l’Est providing apartments found along the I-10 and by opportunities for the inclusion of lower density encouraging the development of quality retail multi-family residential in the appropriate that will enhance the day-to-day life for locations; neighborhood residents and encourage growth in property values. • Adequately redevelop commercial areas such as the Versailles Business District; • Develop Urban Design Corridors along Alcee Neighborhood Recovery Goals Fortier Boulevard; The recovery plan is to be used as a tool for the • Create mixed-use districts at I-10 nodes; Aerial Map of the Village de L’Est Neighborhood (Above) community to achieve goals that ensure that City of New Orleans Neighborhoods Rebuilding Plan • Create a new Town Centre attracting quality Gulf Outlet as to limit the risk of another of Eastern New Orleans who had lost the owners, community based organizations, retail and dining; devastating storm surge; majority of their possessions and even city support services, and elected officials. some of their loved ones were now given • Recover, expand and design beautiful open • Prevention of the neighborhood becoming a the task of “proving their viability”. The purpose of the design team was to spaces and parks; dumping ground for Katrina-related debris, analyze data, provide neighborhood particularly as it relates to the Chef Menteur In early January, the leaders of the area’s history, identify neighborhood patterns, • Create new pocket parks to satisfy the needs Landfill which is currently operational but known associations began meeting at the and to define the characteristics of the of Village de l’Est residents; considered a major environmental and Eastover Country Club temporary trailer neighborhoods. development hazard. with planners, architects and statisticians • Promote the development of a senior to discuss the recovery process for the By focusing on the facts generated from housing village inclusive of a new church, community. The initial meetings began the data collected, community members chapel, cultural center and community garden; Planning Process and with a group of 12 individuals and were able to refocus their personal opinion 5 Neighborhood Participation eventually grew into a planning discussion on how the neighborhood as a whole • Replace the street tree canopy destroyed by involving over 2500 residents of the would heal. The design teams evaluated Hurricane Katrina; The Village de L’est neighborhood consists district. The community began a planning the data and presented recommendations of several smaller neighborhood process that allowed the residents, in a series of open district planning • Promote the redevelopment of the Six Flags associations and subdivisions.
Recommended publications
  • Facing the Future in St. Bernard Parish, Louisian: Planning and Development
    University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations Dissertations and Theses Summer 8-1984 Facing the Future in St. Bernard Parish, Louisian: Planning and Development Gregory L. Chase University of New Orleans, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td Part of the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Recommended Citation Chase, Gregory L., "Facing the Future in St. Bernard Parish, Louisian: Planning and Development" (1984). University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations. 1718. https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/1718 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by ScholarWorks@UNO with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights- holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FACING THE FUTURE IN ST. BERNARD PARISH, LOUISIANA: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of New Orleans In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Urban Studies In The School of Urban and Regional Studies by Gregory L. Chase Bachelor of General Studies University of New Orleans, 1978 August 1984 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my sincere thanks to the members of my thesis committee, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • New Algiers Terreform
    NEW ALGIERS TERREFORM NEW ALGIERS terreformInc 01 CONTENT ANALYSIS 18-41 08 Issues 36 SOLUTIONS 02 64-73 ISSUES Zoning Calculations and Data 08 Solution 36 TERREFORM Mix-use Waterfront Costs 66 01 Issues 20-21 09 Issues 37-38 Income 67 Urban Ecology: Mobility/Economics Calculations 68 Water Drainage 09 Solution 39 Cost Comparisons 69 (Regional Scale) Connection between Existing Building Respiratory Functions 70-72 01 Issues 22 and Mix-use Waterfront Water Drainage Water/Waste NEW ALGIERS 10 Issues 40 (Neighborhood Scale) Topography Energy/Food 01 Solution 23 10 Solution 41 Urban Ecology: 100 yr. Flood Protection Sustainable Drainage System COLOPHON 04 02 Issues 24 SOLUTIONS 01 42-62 APPENDICES 74-81 Urban Ecology: Building Proposal: Bird Migration Habitable Levee Linear Imaginary 76-77 ABOUT TERREFORM 05 (Regional Scale) Barrier Systems (Netherlands) 78-79 02 Solution 25 Barrier Systems (New Orleans) 80-81 Urban Ecology: “Nexus” Urban-Planning 44 INTRODUCTION 06-09 Green Corridors (Regional/ Master Plan - Uses 45 Neighborhood Scale) Master Plan 46 03 Issues 26 Connection to Federal City 47 Urban Ecology: 2010 Street Extension / View Shed 48 Deepwater Horizon Oil Disaster Calculation of One Building Unit: 49-51 03 Solution 27 Food Urban Ecology: Renewable Water Energy Practice/Fish Farming Energy/Waste LEVEE HISTORY 10-17 04 Issues 28-29 Bird’s Eye View 52 ALGIERS OVERVIEW Flooding/Land Loss Ground Plan 53 04 Solution 30-31 Sectional Perspective 54-55 Reconceptualize Levees Sectional Perspective 56 Levee Timeline 12-13 05 Issues 32 (View
    [Show full text]
  • 16 Hours Ert! 8 Meals!
    Iron Rattler; photo by Tim Baldwin Switchback; photo by S. Madonna Horcher Great White; photo by Keith Kastelic LIVING LARGE IN THE LONE STAR STATE! Our three host parks boast a total of 16 coasters, including Iron Rattler at Six Flags Fiesta Texas, Switch- Photo by Tim Baldwin back at ZDT’s Amuse- ment Park and Steel Eel at SeaWorld. 16 HOURS ERT! 8 MEALS! •An ERT session that includes ALL rides at Six Flags Fiesta Texas •ACE’s annual banquet, with keynote speaker John Duffey, president and CEO, Six Flags •Midway Olympics and Rubber Ducky Regatta •Exclusive access to two Fright Fest haunted houses at Six Flags Fiesta Texas REGISTRATION Postmarked by May 27, 2017 NOT A MEMBER? JOIN TODAY! or completed online by June 5, 2017. You’ll enjoy member rates when you join today online or by mail. No registrations accepted after June 5, 2017. There is no on-site registration. Memberships in the world’s largest ride enthusiast organization start at $20. Visit aceonline.org/joinace to learn more. ACE MEMBERS $263 ACE MEMBERS 3-11 $237 SIX FLAGS SEASON PASS DISCOUNT NON-MEMBERS $329 Your valid 2017 Six Flags season pass will NON-MEMBERS 3-11 $296 save you $70 on your registration fee! REGISTER ONLINE ZDT’S EXTREME PASSES Video contest entries should be mailed Convenient, secure online registration is Attendees will receive ZDT’s Extreme to Chris Smilek, 619 Washington Cross- available at my.ACEonline.org. Passes, for unlimited access to all attrac- ing, East Stroudsburg, PA, 18301-9812, tions on Thursday, June 22.
    [Show full text]
  • New Orleans and Hurricane Katrina. II: the Central Region and the Lower Ninth Ward
    New Orleans and Hurricane Katrina. II: The Central Region and the Lower Ninth Ward R. B. Seed, M.ASCE;1; R. G. Bea, F.ASCE2; A. Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, S.M.ASCE3; G. P. Boutwell, F.ASCE4; J. D. Bray, F.ASCE5; C. Cheung, M.ASCE6; D. Cobos-Roa7; L. Ehrensing, M.ASCE8; L. F. Harder Jr., M.ASCE9; J. M. Pestana, M.ASCE10; M. F. Riemer, M.ASCE11; J. D. Rogers, M.ASCE12; R. Storesund, M.ASCE13; X. Vera-Grunauer, M.ASCE14; and J. Wartman, M.ASCE15 Abstract: The failure of the New Orleans regional flood protection systems, and the resultant catastrophic flooding of much of New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina, represents the most costly failure of an engineered system in U.S. history. This paper presents an overview of the principal events that unfolded in the central portion of the New Orleans metropolitan region during this hurricane, and addresses the levee failures and breaches that occurred along the east–west trending section of the shared Gulf Intracoastal Waterway/ Mississippi River Gulf Outlet channel, and along the Inner Harbor Navigation Channel, that affected the New Orleans East, the St. Bernard Parish, and the Lower Ninth Ward protected basins. The emphasis in this paper is on geotechnical lessons, and also broader lessons with regard to the design, implementation, operation, and maintenance of major flood protection systems. Significant lessons learned here in the central region include: ͑1͒ the need for regional-scale flood protection systems to perform as systems, with the various components meshing well together in a mutually complementary manner; ͑2͒ the importance of considering all potential failure modes in the engineering design and evaluation of these complex systems; and ͑3͒ the problems inherent in the construction of major regional systems over extended periods of multiple decades.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Awards Finalists
    Press Club of New Orleans 2015 Awards Finalists SPORTS FEATURE - TV Sean Fazende WVUE-TV Home Patrol Garland Gillen WVUE-TV Changing the Game Tom Gregory WLAE-TV Flyboarding: The New Extreme Sport SPORTS ACTION VIDEOGRAPHY Adam Copus WWL-TV Boston Marathon Runners Edwin Goode WVUE-TV Saints vs. 49ers Carlton Rahmani WGNO-TV Ivana Coleman - Boxer SPORTS SHOW William Hill WLAE-TV Inside New Orleans Sports Doug Mouton, Danny Rockwell WWL-TV Fourth Down on Four Staff WVUE-TV FOX 8 Live Tailgate - Detroit Lions SPORTSCAST - TV Sean Fazende WVUE-TV Fox8 Sports at 10pm Doug Mouton WWL-TV Eyewitness Sports Chad Sabadie, John Bennett WVUE-TV Fox8 Sports at 10pm SPORTS STORY - WRITING Larry Holder NOLA.com | The Times-Picayune Seattle Seahawks obliterate Peyton Manning, Denver Broncos 43-8 in Super Bowl 2014 Randy Rosetta NOLA.com | The Times-Picayune LSU toughs out a 2-0 pitchers' duel win over Florida for the 2014 SEC Tournament crown Lyons Yellin WWL-TV Saints embarrassed in 41-10 home loss SPORTS FEATURE - WRITING Thomas Leggett Louisiana Health and Fitness Magazine The Sailing Life Randy Rosetta NOLA.com | The Times-Picayune Juggling life as an active-duty Marine and a LSU football player is a rewarding challenge for Luke Boyd Ramon Antonio Vargas New Orleans Advocate Still Running: Khiry Robinson's ability on the football field helped him escape his troubles off it SPORTS BLOG - INTERNET Larry Holder NOLA.com | The Times-Picayune Larry Holder’s Entries Chris Price Biz New Orleans The Pennant Chase Staff Bourbon Street Shots, LLC Bourbon Street
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: the Context: Previous Planning and the Charter Amendment
    Volume 3 chapter 3 THE CONTEXT: PREVIOUS PLANNING AND THE CHARTER AMENDMENT his 2009–2030 New Orleans Plan for the 21st Century builds on a strong foundation of previous planning and a new commitment to strong linkage between planning and land use decision making. City Planning Commission initiatives in the 1990s, the pre-Hurricane Katrina years, and the neighborhood-based recovery plans created after Hurricane Katrina inform this long-term Tplan. Moreover, the City entered a new era in November 2008 when voters approved an amendment to the City Charter that strengthened the relationship between the city’s master plan, the comprehensive zoning ordinance and the city’s capital improvement plan, and mandated creation of a system for neighborhood participation in land use and development decision-making—popularly described as giving planning “the force of law.” A Planning Districts For planning purposes, the City began using a map in 1970 designating the boundaries and names of 73 neighborhoods. When creating the 1999 Land Use Plan, the CPC decided to group those 73 neighborhoods into 13 planning districts, using census tract or census block group boundaries for statistical purposes. In the post-Hurricane Katrina era, the planning districts continue to be useful, while the neighborhood identity designations, though still found in many publications, are often contested by residents. This MAP 3.1: PLANNING DISTRICTS Lake No 2 Lake Pontchartrain 10 Michou d Canal Municipal Yacht Harbor 9 6 5 Intracoastal W aterway Mississippi River G ulf O utlet 11 Bayou Bienvenue 7 l 4 bor r Cana Ha l a v nner Na I 8 11 10 1b 9 6 1a Planning Districts ¯ 0 0.9 1.8 3.6 0.45 2.7 Miles 3 2 12 13 Mississippi River master plan uses the 13 planning districts as delineated by the CPC.
    [Show full text]
  • Jefferson Parish
    JEFFERSON PARISH 2015 MULTIJURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE MARCH 2015 Table of Contents Section 1 Executive Summary 6 1.1 Organization of the Plan 7 1.2 Background 7 1.3 Hazards and Risks 8 1.3.1 Hazards 8 1.3.2 Risks 9 1.4 Summary of Goals, Objectives, Strategies and Actions 9 1.4.1 Hazard Mitigation Goals 9 1.4.2 Hazard Mitigation Objectives 10 1.4.3 Hazard Mitigation Strategies 10 1.4.4 Action Items 11 1.5 The Planning Process 11 1.6 Approval and Adoption Process 12 1.7 Implementation Process 12 1.8 Monitoring and Updating Processes 12 Section 2 Background 13 2.1 Introduction 13 2.1.1 Scope of the Plan 13 2.2 Organization, Objectives and Mission 14 2.3 Background Information 15 2.3.1 Geography 15 2.3.2 Parish History 18 2.3.3 Climate 19 2.3.4 Transportation 19 2.3.5 Community Assets 19 2.3.6 Population and Growth 21 2.4 The Louisiana State Hazard Mitigation Plan 24 Section 3 Planning Process 25 3.1 Interim Final Rule Requirements 25 3.2 Federal Mitigation Planning Requirements 26 3.3 Description of the Planning Process 27 3.3.1 How the Plan was Prepared and Updated 27 3.3.2 Step 1 – Organize Resources 28 3.3.3 Step 2 – Assess Risks 31 3.3.4 Step 3 – Identify and Scope Potential Projects 31 3.3.5 Step 4 – Develop the Mitigation Plan 32 2 3.3.6 Step 5 – Implement Plan and Monitor Progress 32 3.4 How the Public and Jurisdictions were Involved 32 3.5 Other Local Planning Mechanisms 33 3.6 Review/Incorporation of Plans, Studies, Reports, and 34 other information Section 4 Hazard Identification, Ranking, and Risk Assessments
    [Show full text]
  • Coaster Manufacturers Thing of the Week! Arrow Dynamics - Overview
    98-186: Roller Coasters Week 6: Coaster Manufacturers Thing of the Week! Arrow Dynamics - Overview ● American ● Primarily steel coasters ● 1960’s - 2002 Arrow Dynamics - Disneyland ● Founded 1946 by WWII vets Karl Bacon and Ed Morgan ● Contracted by Disneyland in 1953 to build most of its original rides Arrow Dynamics - Fame ● Developed the original Matterhorn Bobsleds, the first steel coaster! ● In the 60’s, developed log flumes ● In 70’s-80’s, continued with coasters and had lots of success due to their innovation ○ Invented the suspended coaster ● Almost every major park had an Arrow coaster Arrow Dynamics - Decline ● In the 90’s other steel manufacturers like B&M and Intamin drove Arrow away ● Their coasters were higher quality ● Arrow tried one last hurrah with X at SFMM, but it failed ● X was the first “4D” coaster, invented by Arrow ● Went bankrupt in 2002 Schwarzkopf - Overview ● German ● Steel ● 1960’s - 1990’s Schwarzkopf - Beginnings ● Named after Anton Schwarzkopf, the engineer who owned the company ● Began with rides for traveling fairs, which are popular in Germany ● In 1964, made their first steel coaster, the Wildcat ○ Simple, but copied across Germany and U.S. Schwarzkopf - Portable Coasters ● Also known for innovation ● Invented the portable roller coaster, important for European markets ● Some could stand 100ft tall but still be small and able to be packed in a week or two ● Also invented shuttle coasters and shuttle loops Schwarzkopf - Downfall ● Anton was not a good businessman ● Schwarzkopf went bankrupt several times,
    [Show full text]
  • GEAUGA LAKE: the Next 100 Years
    The next 100 years May 2017 GEAUGA LAKE: The next 100 years Prepared For Additional Guidance From Cedar Fair Ann Womer Benjamin Jud Kline Arthur Schmidt Prepared by Mayor President Planner Viking Planners Group City of Aurora Cividad Services City of Cleveland With Kirby Date Jeffrey Markley Jennifer Syx Executive in Residence Trustee President Cleveland State University Cleveland State University Bainbridge Township In-Site Advisory Group Dr. Wendy Kellog Mr. James Kastelic Heather Elmer Michael Mears Dave Vasarhelyi Director Planner Senior Program Manager Chagrin River Watershed Partners Cuyahoga County Trust for Public Land Babette Gowda Duffield Milkie Leigh Woodall Watershed Coordinator General Counsel Property Manager Tinkers Creek Watershed Partners Cedar Fair Wild Water Kingdom Jeff Kerr Dr. Robert Simons Principal Professor Environmental Design Group Cleveland State University Thank you to All of the additional stakeholders and survey respondants who volunteered their time to share their opinions and without whom this plan would not be nearly as rich. Geauga Lake: The next 100 Years • Aurora & Bainbridge, Ohio • May 2017 • VPG -2- Viking Planners Group Mackenzie Albach Shannan Sydney Martis Beattie Tyler McGee Austin Bloom John Micklewright Alyson Cameron Rachel Oscar Drew Crawford Bianca Rozenblad Darren Cross Peter Scully Ralph D’Alessio Luke Seaberg Isabel DeRoberts Steven Spithas Thomas Horsman Susan Vincent Simon Husted Arleesha Wilson Ethan Lawson May 2017 Geauga Lake: The next 100 Years • Aurora & Bainbridge, Ohio • May 2017 • VPG -3- Executive Summary • 5 I. Celebrate • 9 Introduction • 10 History of Geauga Lake • Case Studies • 12 Demographics • 13 Zoning • 16 Vision and Branding • 18 II. Enjoy • 20 Survey and Stakeholder Analysis • 21 Highest and Best Use • 25 III.
    [Show full text]
  • Port NOLA PIER Plan
    Port NOLA PIER Plan DRAFT Port Inner Harbor Economic Revitalization Plan (PIER Plan) DRAFT February 2020 DRAFT FROM THE PRESIDENT AND CEO Together with the Board of Commissioners of the Port of New Orleans, I am pleased to share the Port Inner Harbor Economic Revitalization Plan (PIER Plan) — a collaborative vision to revitalize the Inner Harbor District, increase commercial activity and create quality jobs for area residents. The Port NOLA Strategic Master Plan, adopted in 2018, laid out a bold vision for the next 20 years and a roadmap for growth that identified a need for regional freight-based economic development. This planning effort provided the framework for the PIER Plan. Brandy D. Christian President and CEO, Evolution in global shipping trends, changes in investment Port of New Orleans and New Orleans Public Belt Railroad strategies and multiple natural disasters have left the Port’s Corporation Inner Harbor in need of a new plan that aligns with our strategic vision and supports our economic mission. Port NOLA’s role as a port authority is to plan, build, maintain and support the infrastructure to grow jobs and economic opportunitiesDRAFT related to trade and commerce. We know that revitalization and future development cannot be done in a vacuum, so collaboration is at the core of the PIER Plan as well. True to our values, we engaged and worked with a diverse range of stakeholders in the process — including government agencies, industry, tenants, and neighboring communities as hands-on, strategic partners. The PIER Plan sets a course for redevelopment and investment in the Inner Harbor that reverberates economic prosperity beyond Port property and throughout the entire region.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stories of Five Communities
    SURVIVING CANCER ALLEY The Stories of Five Communities Report supported by the Climate Advocacy Lab CANCER ALLEY The Mississippi River Chemical Corridor produces one-fifth of the United States' petrochemicals and transformed one of the poorest, slowest-growing sections of Louisiana into working class communities. Yet this growth has not come without a cost: the narrow corridor absorb more toxic substances annually than do most entire states.1 An 85-mile stretch along the corridor, infamously known as "Cancer Alley," is home to more than 150 heavy industrial facilities, and the air, water, and soil along this corridor are so full of carcinogens and mutagens that it has been described as a "massive human experiment."2 According to the Centers for Disease Control, Louisiana has consistently ranked among the states with the highest rates of cancer. Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping by the Deep South Center for Environmental Justice not only shows a correlation between industrial pollution and race in nine Louisiana parishes along the Corridor, but also finds that pollution sources increase as the population of African Americans increases. MAP OF COMMUNITIES IN LOUISIANA Cancer Alley 1 Norco 3 1 4 2 Convent 2 3 Mossville 4 New Orleans East 2 INTRO HISTORY OF LOUISIANA’S MISSISSIPPI RIVER CHEMICAL CORRIDOR The air, soil, and water along the Mississippi River Chemical Corridor absorb more toxic substances annually than do most entire states. We look briefly at the history and development of this corridor, as well as the founding of the Deep South Center for Environmental Justice (DSCEJ), to provide the background and context for the case studies that follow.
    [Show full text]
  • Q:\KATHLYN\ORDERS\06-10729, MSJ.Wpd
    Case 2:06-cv-10729-JCZ-DEK Document 134 Filed 02/01/08 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SIX FLAGS INC. CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 06-10729 WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES SECTION T(3) INSURANCE COMPANY et al. ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court are the following motions: Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Liberty Corporate Capital(“Liberty”), Rec. Doc. No. 63; and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company (“Westchester”), Arch Specialty Insurance Company (“Arch”), Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) PLC (“Great Lakes”), Commonwealth Insurance Company (“Commonwealth”), Axis Specialty Insurance Company (“Axis”), and Continental Casualty Company (“Continental”). Rec. Doc. No. 66. An Opposition to the Motions was filed by the Plaintiff. Rec. Doc. No. 74. The Motions came for hearing with Oral Argument on July 11, 2007 and were taken under submission. The Court, having considered the arguments of counsel, the parties’ briefs, the Court record, applicable law and jurisprudence is fully apprised of the matter and is ready to rule. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Six Flags, Inc. (“Six Flags”) owned and operated an amusement park at 12301 Case 2:06-cv-10729-JCZ-DEK Document 134 Filed 02/01/08 Page 2 of 18 Lake Forest Boulevard in Orleans Parish that was heavily flooded during Hurricane Katrina on or about August 29, 2005. At the time of the loss, Six Flags had in effect “all-risk first-party property insurance coverage” which covered the period of time during which Hurricane Katrina struck. Six Flags had multiple layers of insurance, totaling $200 million in aggregate limits of coverage as follows: a primary layer with $25 million in limits, a first excess layer of $50 million, and a second excess layer of $125 million.
    [Show full text]