DOCSLIB.ORG

To Transmit Maritime Cultural Heritage (MCH) Knowledge for MSP Processes STEP 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
To Transmit Maritime Cultural Heritage (MCH) Knowledge for MSP Processes STEP 1 To transmit Maritime Cultural Heritage (MCH) knowledge for MSP processes STEP 1 BalticRIM status report WP 2 GoA 2.1 Marianne Lehtimäki, Riikka Tevali, Sallamaria Tikkanen March 2019 1 Content 1. The BalticRIM framework and WP 2 ............................................................................................ 2 1.1 Baltic Sea cross-border collaboration on maritime heritage ..................................................... 3 1.2 Previous BSR maritime heritage projects .................................................................................. 6 1.3 Baltic Sea Underwater Cultural Heritage (UCH) ......................................................................... 8 2. Target: an overview of existing knowledge and gaps on MCH ..................................................... 12 2.1 MSP evidence needs ................................................................................................................ 13 2.2 From data registers to themes, spatial entities and descriptions of significance .................... 14 3. Concepts, methods and analyses ............................................................................................... 15 3.1 MCH instead of UCH – a challenge .......................................................................................... 16 3.2 BalticRIM MediaWiki – a glossary of MCH terms .................................................................... 17 3.3 Mapping of existing registers and practices ............................................................................ 17 3.4 MCH registers - descriptions .................................................................................................... 23 3.5 BalticRIM templates for MSP test & use .................................................................................. 31 3.6 Elaborating the concept of “Underwater Heritage Landscape” .............................................. 46 4. Findings on existing knowledge and gaps on MCH for MSP ......................................................... 51 4.1 Open MCH data vs. restricted MCH data for MSP ................................................................... 52 5. Identifying topics of MCH & MSP recommendations .................................................................. 54 Appendix 2 1. The BalticRIM framework and WP 2 According to Talis Linkaits, then Chair of the VASAB Secretariat, underwater heritage creates boundary condition for the Maritime Spatial Planning (MSP) in the same way as nature.1At the same time, heritage can be considered as a single mode of use, or incorporated into appropriate forms of MSP -zoning. The purpose of the BalticRIM project is to find recommended practices at regional level for these options, also promoting upgraded heritage management and MSP practices at national levels. Several BSR macro-regional organisations, such as the Council of the Baltic Sea States2 (CBSS), the EUSBSR PA Culture Coordinators and VASAB-HELCOM, have encouraged and supported the construction of the project Baltic Sea Region Integrated Maritime Cultural Heritage Management (BalticRIM). They have contributed to building collaboration between regional networks of heritage and Maritime Spatial Planning (hereinafter MSP) experts. The idea of the BalticRIM project came in the Pro BSR -project 2014-15, which was created by the Baltic Region Heritage Committee (BRHC)3, carried out by the heritage experts involved in the regional collaboration and financed by the CBSS Project Support Facility. The primary task of the Pro BSR project was to elaborate the first macro-regional heritage-strategy with related Action Plan for the Maritime Cultural Heritage. The project reviewed outcome of the past heritage projects, current global and macro-regional challenges and priorities. This mapping led to a target to integrate cultural heritage into ongoing regional and national MSP-processes. Directive 2014/89/EU of the European parliament and of the council of 23 July 2014 establishing a framework for maritime spatial planning created the momentum for integrating the maritime heritage to the ongoing macro-regional MSP-policy development. The former underwater and coastal heritage projects have generated the insight of the unique and diverse richness of the Baltic Sea underwater and maritime heritage when perceived as one entity. Common project activities have trained well-working macro-regional heritage expert Working Groups. At the same time, numerous earlier and ongoing MSP projects engaging the MSP-network Submariner have created readiness for the macro-regional MSP- network for cross-sectoral interaction. 1 At the Pro BSR project meeting 27 August 2015 in Tallinn. ProBSR project by the heritage sector initiated the BalticRIM seed money phase. 2 The concept of the Baltic Sea States (BSS) refers to a political coalition, and includes Denmark; Estonia; Finland; Germany (the northern States); Iceland, Latvia; Lithuania; Norway; Poland; Russian Federation and Sweden. 3 The BRHC is composed of representatives of the state heritage agencies operating in the Baltic Sea States. 3 The next step was the joint project MSP & BSR Integrated Maritime Heritage Management (MSP & MHM) together with MSP network and funded by the EUSBSR Seed Money Facility 2016. During that phase, the EU Commission nominated the BalticRIM-project as the EUSBSR PA Culture Flagship. The project was approved for BSR Interreg funding program in 2017-2020, recommended by the VASAB- HELCOM Joint MSP Working Group. The macro-regional network of the Baltic Sea States Subregional Co-operation (BSSSC) joined the project as the Associated Organisation. This notable anchoring of the project to the Baltic Sea region stakeholders is due to a long heritage cooperation structures and to the macro-regional MSP platform, as well as thanks to several previous projects. 1.1 Baltic Sea cross-border collaboration on maritime heritage The third Conference of Baltic Sea States (BSS) Ministers for Culture in 1997 stated that cultural heritage is an essential part of the environment and an important factor for economic and social development. The Ministers stressed the importance of strengthening the common identity in the Baltic Sea region (BSR). Culture was seen as a uniting element in this massive but necessary task. Special attention should be given to cultural heritage cooperation that could balance the development gaps of management and generate common heritage approaches. The Ministers addressed respective national heritage agencies to identify, launch and coordinate regional activities on cultural heritage. The Baltic Region Heritage Committee (then the Monitoring Group on cultural heritage in the Baltic Sea States, MG) was nominated. The Committee in turn selected the underwater heritage and coastal culture as central thematic topics for close expert cooperation. The Working Groups on Underwater Heritage and on Coastal Heritage were formally established in 2000. Regular professional networking and cooperation between heritage experts continued ever since in form of sharing data, policies and best practises as well as creating new ones by common projects. Political support by the BSS Ministers of Culture continued ever since. The Copenhagen Declaration of the fifth Conference of the CBSS Ministers of Culture in 2001 stated that: “...The ministers expressed their intention to strengthen cooperation on the study of the underwater cultural heritage supporting specific projects etc. They therefore asked the monitoring group to examine the perspectives of co-operation on the protection based on the provisions of the UN convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982...” 4 In 2003, the Saint-Petersburg Declaration of the sixth Conference of the Baltic Sea States' Ministers of Culture highlighted the work done by the BSR Underwater Heritage Working Group: “...The Ministers encouraged the Monitoring group to examine the possibilities of cooperation on the protection of the underwater cultural heritage in the Baltic Sea... Due to the fact that only Lithuania had ratified the UNESCO Convention on Underwater Heritage Management, the Working Group on Underwater Heritage elaborated The Code of Good Practice for the Management of Underwater Cultural Heritage in the Baltic Sea Region (COPUCH, 2008)) together with the Baltic Region Heritage Committee..” In 2016, the Annex to the Warsaw Declaration Endorsed at the meeting of the Deputy Foreign Ministers of the Council of the Baltic Sea States mentioned also the joint activities on underwater and coastal heritage: “The former projects of the Underwater Heritage Working Group have revealed that the underwater heritage assets of the Baltic Sea are unique even on the global scale if we perceive the Baltic Sea as one entity. The Working Group approved a Code of Good Practice for the Protection of the Underwater Heritage of the Baltic Sea, in order to enhance the protection of the fragile treasure, which is under increased pressure from sea use. The flagship initiative develops further tools for the cross-sector engagement of protection and sustainable management of common heritage assets. The activities of the Coastal Heritage Working Group verify how the coastal traditions and heritage link the people around the Baltic Sea. The Working Group values and revitalizes maritime heritage in all of its diversity by exhibitions and joint projects....” 5 Code of Good Practice for the Management of the Underwater Cultural Heritage in the Baltic Sea Region (COPUCH) is an
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Integrating Cultural Heritage Into Maritime Spatial Planning in the BSR
    Integrating Cultural Heritage into Maritime Spatial Planning in the BSR Final publication of the Baltic Sea Region Integrated Maritime Cultural Heritage Management Project 2017-2020 Integrating cultural heritage into maritime spatial planning in the BSR Final publication of the Baltic Sea Region Integrated Maritime Cultural Heritage Management Project (BalticRIM) 2017-2020 Editors: Marianne Lehtimäki, Sallamaria Tikkanen and Riikka Tevali, Finnish Heritage Agency Authors in bold and contributors: Susanne Altvater, Robert Aps, Leyla Bashirova, Nerijus Blazauskas, Larisa Danilova, Kristjan Herkl, Krista Karro, Krzysztof Kurzyk, Liisi Lees, Marianne Lehtimäki, Paweł Litwinienko, Matthias Maluck, Magdalena Matczak, Joanna Pardus, Iwona Pomian, Janusz Rżycki, Mailis Roio, Lise Schrøder, Laura Seesmeri, Łukasz Szydłowski, Riikka Tevali, Sallamaria Tikkanen, Jakub Turski, Joanna Witkowska, Kamila Zalesiak, Jacek Zaucha, Vladas Zulkus, Daniel Zwick. Layout and graphic design: Mainostoimisto KMG Turku Cover photo: Wreck of Korpostrm Alf, Parainen, Finland. Photo: Maija Huttunen Contact persons for the BalticRIM project: Matthias Maluck, Lead Partner State Archaeology Department of Schleswig-Holstein and Coordinator Susanne Altvater, s.Pro Contact person for cultural heritage: Sallamaria Tikkanen, Finnish Heritage Agency Contact person for MSP: Jacek Zaucha, University of Gdańsk Contact person for BalticRIM Data Portal: Lise Schrder, Aalborg University Disclaimer: The publication is a result of the project “BalticRIM– Baltic Sea Region Integrated Maritime Cultural Heritage Management” (2017–2020). Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund). Report content is the sole responsibility of the authors and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. Foreword Water connects us, and culture unites. This Council coastal cultural heritage combined their expertise of Baltic Sea States’ motto can be applied as an with the Submariner Network for Blue Growth overall theme for the BalticRIM approach, too.
    [Show full text]
  • Katri Vuola WOOD SPECIES and the QUESTION of ORIGIN
    75 Katri Vuola WOOD SPECIES AND THE QUESTION OF ORIGIN: REASSESSING THE SCULPTURE PRODUCTION IN THE DIOCESE OF TURKU (ÅBO) DURING THE 14TH CENTURY It was oak that was preferred abroad, sometimes limewood, for such carvings. In the Nordic countries birch and other of our common wood species were used for this, yet, in the old account books one can also find remarks on the imports of wood during the 15th and 16th centuries, possibly for the material of the artworks, for the most part possibly mainly for the chairs and chests in the castles as well as bishops’ seats and choir screens, e.g. for the needs of the churches.1 This short outline of the wood use in medieval ecclesiastical sculpture and church furnishing is included in Emil Nervander’s (1840–1914) essay on church art in Finland, published in a series of Kansanvalistusseuran toimituksia (1887), a journal aimed for the education of the public. In addition to being a writer, Nervander was the planner, and on some occasions also the leader of art historical DOI: https://doi.org/10.12697/BJAH.2019.18.02 1 Emil Nervander, Kirkollisesta taiteesta Suomessa keskiaikana. Ensimmäinen vihko. Kansanvalistusseuran toimituksia LXXIII (Helsinki, 1887), 27. The translation of the citation from Swedish into English is by the author. 76 K ATR I VUOLA WOOD SPECIES AND THE QUESTION OF ORIGIN 77 excursions to rural churches in Finland, organized by The Finnish Eastern part of the Swedish kingdom in the Middle Ages. I will do Antiquarian Society from the 1870s to the early 1900s.
    [Show full text]
  • Miljöministeriet Ministry of the Environment Lojuly 2019 VN/6594
    Ympäristöministeriö Miljöministeriet Date Ministry of the Environment lOJuly 2019 VN/6594/2018 Ministry of the Environment of Estonia Narva mnt 7a 15172 TALLI N N ESTONIA [email protected] Your ref. 20 May 2019 No 7-12/7635-12 Finland's response to the notification concerning the Draft of the Estonian Maritime Spatial Pian and the description of its environmental impacts On 20 May, the Ministry of the Environment received a notification f ro m the Estonian environmental authorities concerning the Draft of the Estonian Maritime Spatial Pian (MPS) and a description of its environmental impacts. The objective of maritime spatial planning is to agree on the long-term principles of use of the Estonian marine a rea in order to attain and maintain a good status of the marine environment and promote the maritime economy. On 20 December 2018, Finland announced that it vvould participate in the environmental assessment of the Estonian Maritime Spatial Pian. The environmental assessment is carried out based on the Protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment appended to the UN Economic Commission for Europe Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context (the Espoo Convention). According to the Protocol, Finland has the right to participate in the environmental assessment of a pian or programme to be implemented in another State if the implementation of the pian or programme vvould have significant environmental impacts on Finland. This means that authorities, residents and communities in Finland have the opportunity to issue statements and opinions concerning the Estonian Maritime Spatial Pian and its environmental assessment. Under the Act on the Environmental Impact Assessment of Authorities' Plans and Programmes (200/2005), the Ministry of the Environment shall look after the notification and negotiation tasks related to the environmental assessment of the pian or programme with the State in question.
    [Show full text]
  • Seeing Behind Stray Finds : Understanding the Late Iron Age Settlement of Northern Ostrobothnia and Kainuu, Finland
    B 168 OULU 2018 B 168 UNIVERSITY OF OULU P.O. Box 8000 FI-90014 UNIVERSITY OF OULU FINLAND ACTA UNIVERSITATIS OULUENSIS ACTA UNIVERSITATIS OULUENSIS ACTA HUMANIORAB Ville Hakamäki Ville Hakamäki University Lecturer Tuomo Glumoff SEEING BEHIND STRAY FINDS University Lecturer Santeri Palviainen UNDERSTANDING THE LATE IRON AGE SETTLEMENT OF NORTHERN OSTROBOTHNIA Postdoctoral research fellow Sanna Taskila AND KAINUU, FINLAND Professor Olli Vuolteenaho University Lecturer Veli-Matti Ulvinen Planning Director Pertti Tikkanen Professor Jari Juga University Lecturer Anu Soikkeli Professor Olli Vuolteenaho UNIVERSITY OF OULU GRADUATE SCHOOL; UNIVERSITY OF OULU, FACULTY OF HUMANITIES, Publications Editor Kirsti Nurkkala ARCHAEOLOGY ISBN 978-952-62-2093-2 (Paperback) ISBN 978-952-62-2094-9 (PDF) ISSN 0355-3205 (Print) ISSN 1796-2218 (Online) ACTA UNIVERSITATIS OULUENSIS B Humaniora 168 VILLE HAKAMÄKI SEEING BEHIND STRAY FINDS Understanding the Late Iron Age settlement of Northern Ostrobothnia and Kainuu, Finland Academic dissertation to be presented with the assent of the Doctoral Training Committee of Human Sciences of the University of Oulu for public defence in the Wetteri auditorium (IT115), Linnanmaa, on 30 November 2018, at 10 a.m. UNIVERSITY OF OULU, OULU 2018 Copyright © 2018 Acta Univ. Oul. B 168, 2018 Supervised by Docent Jari Okkonen Professor Per H. Ramqvist Reviewed by Docent Anna Wessman Professor Nils Anfinset Opponent Professor Janne Vilkuna ISBN 978-952-62-2093-2 (Paperback) ISBN 978-952-62-2094-9 (PDF) ISSN 0355-3205 (Printed) ISSN 1796-2218 (Online) Cover Design Raimo Ahonen JUVENES PRINT TAMPERE 2018 Hakamäki, Ville, Seeing behind stray finds. Understanding the Late Iron Age settlement of Northern Ostrobothnia and Kainuu, Finland University of Oulu Graduate School; University of Oulu, Faculty of Humanities, Archaeology Acta Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Bid Book to Your Device
    Culture changes everything Saimaa is a place and a state of mind. On its shores we have found our own way of doing things, living, and thinking. We have found creativity in both beautiful and harsh conditions. That’s why our culture is unique − and worth discovering. We are the droplets that set in motion the power to change culture. When we hit the surface of the water together, we cause a vibration that resonates throughout the world. Culture doesn’t just change the story. It changes everything. The easternmost point of the continental EU is located in the municipality Facts 173 Vekara-Varkaus of Ilomantsi. 127,298 museums Children’s Summer FINL (19 state subsidy) summer cottages/ Festival week AN villas/second homes 26,000 Art Centre D 50 visitors Salmela steamships (Saimaa, ca. 280 in Europe) 6,000 45,000 km of shoreline St. Michel visitors in Savonlinna Trotting Race 116 23,000 Ilosaarirock libraries visitors 64,000 671,586 visitors residents 35,000 bed-places in Kuopio accommodation Dance Festival companies 53 municipalities 37,000 138,596 visitors seasonal residents Savonlinna Imatranajo Opera Festival (The Imatra road race) 40,000 65,000 124 visitors visitors theatres Lappeenranta (8 state subsidy) Sandcastle 600 150,000 km of border visitors Examples shared with North Savo (19 municipalities) Russia of events North Karelia Kuopio (13 municipalities) Municipalities with additional funding: Enonkoski, Heinävesi, Hirvensalmi, Iisalmi, Imatra, Joroinen, Kitee, Kiuruvesi, Kontiolahti, Lemi, Liperi, Luumäki, Mäntyharju, Joensuu Nurmes,
    [Show full text]
  • Finland in Figures 2020
    “ FOLLOW US – NEWS NOTIFICATIONS, SOCIAL MEDIA” STATISTICS FINLAND − Compiles statistics concerning social conditions – Supports decision-making based on facts – Produces reliable and up-to-date information – Promotes the use of statistical data GUIDANCE AND INFORMATION SERVICE +358 29 551 2220 [email protected] www.stat.fi facebook.com/Tilastotohtori twitter.com/tilastokeskus instagram.com/tilastokeskus FINLAND IN FIGURES 2020 ISSN 2242−8496 (pdf) ISBN 978−952−244−655−8 (pdf) ISSN 0357−0371 (print) ISBN 978−952−244−654−1 (print) 9 789522 446541 Product number 3056 (print) Contents Population ........................................ 2 Population structure . 3 Births, deaths and migration . 5 Families . 12 Education . 14 Employment and unemployment . 15 Employees . 18 Pension recipients . 21 Consumption . 23 Economy ........................................ 25 National accounts . 26 Taxation . 28 Prices . 30 Households . 33 Housing and rents . 35 Construction . 38 Enterprises . 39 Industry . 40 Trade . 42 Tourism . 44 Society and environment ........................... 45 Geographical data . 46 Forests, livestock and crops . 48 Energy, emissions and waste . 49 Transport . 51 Offences . 52 Social protection . 53 Culture . 54 Elections . 55 Symbols * preliminary data . category not applicable - magnitude nil . data not available or too uncertain for presentation, or subject to secrecy To the reader Finland in Figures 2020 is about us – you and me . As individuals we are not visible, together we form these statistics . Every Finn, school, work place, enterprise, home, cottage and municipality is included . The journey from data to statistics goes either through registers or interviews conducted . For our interviews we select a representative group of Finns by random selection . You could also be selected for a survey . Statistics are made together! Do you know how many children were born or how many moved from Finland in 2019? And how many pensioners were there in Finland last year? The answers to these and many other questions can be found in this pocket booklet .
    [Show full text]
  • Finnish Maritime Spatial Plan 2030 Marking Card Library
    FINNISH MARITIME SPATIAL PLAN 2030 MARKING CARD LIBRARY MARITIME SPATIAL PLANNING ZONES AND MARKINGS SISÄLLYS MARINE AREA ZONES .................................................................................................................................................... 2 INNER ARCHIPELAGO AND INNER COASTAL WATERS ............................................................................... 3 OUTER ARCHIPELAGO AND OUTER COASTAL WATERS ............................................................................. 5 OPEN SEA ................................................................................................................................................... 6 MARITIME SPATIAL PLANNING MARKINGS .................................................................................................................. 7 ENERGY PRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 8 AQUACULTURE ........................................................................................................................................ 10 FISHING .................................................................................................................................................... 12 CULTURAL VALUES .................................................................................................................................. 14 SIGNIFICANT UNDERWATER NATURAL VALUES .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Sites and Land Use Planning in Finland
    TEIJA TIITINEN The Finnish Heritage Agency Cultural Environment Services Archaeological Sites and Land Use Planning in Finland ABSTRACT: The Finnish Antiquities Act is a very strong law, mandating the protection of all an- cient sites immediately after they have been found. However, it is very inefficient in preserving the surrounding environment or landscape of the ancient sites. All land use in Finland is gov- erned by plans. The Local Master plans are the most important for defining the allowed land use in the vicinity of ancient sites. This paper explores how ancient sites and their environment have been treated in these plans. The analysis showed that a significant portion of the ancient sites covered by the Local Master plans are situated in environments that can be characterised as modern. In addition, the places that are situated in economically less important and less modern environments are those that will be best preserved in the future. KEYWORDS: Ancient remains, cultural landscape, cultural environment, land use planning, local master plans. INTRODUCTION The Finnish Antiquities Act is a very strong law. It automatically protects, without separate Ancient monuments are the oldest historical layers measures required, all antiquities which are within of the landscape. It is not only the visible structures the definition of the act, and prohibits action that that are part of the landscape, but also those struc- might endanger the preservation of these antiqui- tures which are hidden under soil or water. A very ties. It also takes into account the requirements the important question is: how can we preserve those Valletta Treaty (entered into force in Finland on 25 ancient features of the landscapes, and how do we May 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • Entangled Beliefs and Rituals Religion in Finland and Sάpmi from Stone Age to Contemporary Times
    - 1 - ÄIKÄS, LIPKIN & AHOLA Entangled beliefs and rituals Religion in Finland and Sάpmi from Stone Age to contemporary times Tiina Äikäs & Sanna Lipkin (editors) MONOGRAPHS OF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF FINLAND 8 Published by the Archaeological Society of Finland www.sarks.fi Layout: Elise Liikala Cover image: Tiina Äikäs Copyright © 2020 The contributors ISBN 978-952-68453-8-8 (online - PDF) Monographs of the Archaeological Society of Finland ISSN-L 1799-8611 Entangled beliefs and rituals Religion in Finland and Sάpmi from Stone Age to contemporary times MONOGRAPHS OF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF FINLAND 8 Editor-in-Chief Associate Professor Anna-Kaisa Salmi, University of Oulu Editorial board Professor Joakim Goldhahn, University of Western Australia Professor Alessandro Guidi, Roma Tre University Professor Volker Heyd, University of Helsinki Professor Aivar Kriiska, University of Tartu Associate Professor Helen Lewis, University College Dublin Professor (emeritus) Milton Nunez, University of Oulu Researcher Carl-Gösta Ojala, Uppsala University Researcher Eve Rannamäe, Natural Resources Institute of Finland and University of Tartu Adjunct Professor Liisa Seppänen, University of Turku and University of Helsinki Associate Professor Marte Spangen, University of Tromsø - 1 - Entangled beliefs and rituals Religion in Finland and Sápmi from Stone Age to contemporary times Tiina Äikäs & Sanna Lipkin (editors) Table of content Tiina Äikäs, Sanna Lipkin & Marja Ahola: Introduction: Entangled rituals and beliefs from contemporary times to
    [Show full text]
  • Destructive Flooding of Cultural Heritage: Our Future and New Normal?
    Destructive Flooding of Cultural Heritage: Our Future and New Normal? An Investigation of Vulnerabilities in Ekenäs Old Town Jack Henry Raisanen Thesis for a Bachelor of Natural Resources Degree (UAS) The Degree Programme of Sustainable Coastal Management Raseborg, Finland, 2019 CE DEGREE THESIS Author: Jack Henry Raisanen Degree programme and place: Sustainable Coastal Management, Campus Raseborg Supervisors: Lecturer Romi Rancken and Docent Patrik Byholm Title: Destructive Flooding of Cultural Heritage: Our Future and New Normal? An Investigation of Vulnerabilities in Ekenäs Old Town __________________________________________________________________________ Date: May 24, 2019 Number of pages: 58 Appendices: 30 __________________________________________________________________________ Abstract Higher and more common coastal flooding, due to sea level rise and changes in wind patterns, may endanger Ekenäs Old Town (SV: Gamla stan i Ekenäs; FI: Tammisaaren vanha kaupunki) by year 2100. Cultural heritage, including protected buildings and archeologically significant areas, will likely become at greater risk due to flooding. Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI) data and projections have been adapted to Ekenäs Old Town. Sea level rise and storm surge projections, sea level records, and minimum recommended building elevations have been modeled and analyzed using a geographic information system (GIS). Potentially affected areas of Ekenäs Old Town have been further analyzed through study of the Finnish Heritage Agency’s 2002 archaeological inventory of Ekenäs Old Town and targeted field work. Data and information have also been collected from the City of Raseborg and a local resident. Due to already existing risks to cultural heritage, the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry of Finland should designate Ekenäs Old Town as a significant flood risk area in accordance with legislation governing flood risk management (620/2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Researching Cultural Objects and Manuscripts in a Small Country: the Finnish Experience of Raising Awareness of Art Crime
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 23 March 2018 doi:10.20944/preprints201803.0201.v1 Peer-reviewed version available at Arts 2018, 7, 19; doi:10.3390/arts7020019 Article Researching Cultural Objects and Manuscripts in a Small Country: The Finnish Experience of Raising Awareness of Art Crime Suzie Thomas 1,*, Rick Bonnie 1,2, Helen Dixon 3 and Visa Immonen 4 1 Department of Cultures, Faculty of Arts, University of Helsinki, Finland 2 Department of Biblical Studies, Faculty of Theology, University of Helsinki, Finland 3 Department of Religion, Wofford College, Spartanburg, SC, USA 4 Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Turku, Finland * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: In this article we shed light on the position of Finland in conversations on the movement of unprovenanced cultural objects, within the national, the Nordic and the global contexts. Finland’s geopolitical position, as a ‘hard border’ of the European Union neighbouring the Russian Federation, and its current legislative provisions which do not include import regulation, mean that nonetheless has the potential to be significant in understanding the movement of cultural property at transnational levels. In particular, we outline a recent initiative started at the University of Helsinki to kick-start a national debate on ethical working with cultural object and manuscripts. We analyse exploratory research on current awareness and opinion within Finland, and summarize our current work to produce robust research ethics to guide scholars working in Finland. Although Finland has a small population and is usually absent from international discussions on the illicit movement of cultural property (save a few exceptions), we argue that it is still possible — and important — to affect policy and attitudes concerning art crime, provenance, and the role of stakeholders such as decision-makers, traders and the academy.
    [Show full text]
  • A Little Guide Book for the Saari Residents
    A LITTLE GUIDE BOOK FOR THE SAARI RESIDENTS PHOTO: OTTO-VILLE VÄÄTÄINEN © KONE FOUNDATION 2021 CONTENTS Welcome to the Saari Residence! 3 Some practical tips for the new residents 4 Saari team 12 Driving instructions to the Saari Residence 13 Buildings and artworks in the Saari manor area 14 Services in the nearby region of the Saari Residence 15 Library 16 Traffic connections 17 Health care services in the nearby region 18 Private health care services 19 Sports facilities 20 Swimming hall and beaches 21 Everyman’s right in Finland and Mietoinen bay 22 Veterinary care 23 Be vigilant about ticks – they are common in this area 24 Remember to recycle! 25 Recycling biowaste ie. Instructions for using the composter 27 In case of power failure 28 PHOTO: THE FINNISH HERITAGE AGENCY WELCOME TO THE SAARI We wish to offer you the most rewarding residency period possible during which you can concentrate fully on your work, free of the distractions and stress of everyday life. The residence’s versatile workspaces, historical surroundings and peaceful location near a nature reserve and bird wetlands offer a particularly optimal setting in terms of this objective. 3 Please read carefully this little guide book for those arriving at the Saari Residence, it will contain many answers to your many questions about the Saari Residence and your residency period. Please note that the COVID-19 may cause changes in the residence's activites. We are following and executing the instructions and recommendations of the Finnish authorities; The Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL) and Finnish Government and we will adapt our activies and update the guidelines according the current coronavirus situation and recommendations.
    [Show full text]