THE MORAL AUTHORITY a Theory of Political Character by Liam F

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE MORAL AUTHORITY a Theory of Political Character by Liam F THE MORAL AUTHORITY A Theory of Political Character by Liam F. Arthur Hunt Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia August 2017 © Copyright by Liam Hunt, 2017 Dedicated to my mom. ii Table of Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................... v List of Figures .................................................................................................................. vi Abstract.............................................................................................................................. vii Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................ iix Chapter 1: Introduction ............................................................................................ 1 1.1 Elite Moral Analysis: What and Why ........................................................ 1 1.2 Questions and Hypotheses ............................................................................. 6 1.3 Canada’s Security Agencies: A Brief Institutional History ................. 8 1.4 The Future of the Surveillance State in Canada ...................................... 10 1.5 “Accountability Gaps” in the Canadian Surveillance Regime ............ 13 Chapter 2: Moral and Political Psychology: Theory and Method ........... 16 2.1 What is Moral Psychology? .......................................................................... 16 2.2 Moral Psychology from Antiquity to Modernity .................................... 17 2.3 Moral Foundations and Social Intuitionism ............................................. 21 2.4 Chapter Conclusions ........................................................................................ 30 Chapter 3: A Genetic and Patrilineal History of Stephen Harper ........... 31 3.1 Early Family Lineage: 1774-1951 ............................................................... 31 3.2 Tragedy and Toronto: Stephen’s Parental Upbringing .......................... 34 3.3 Steve: The Toronto Years: 1959-1978 ....................................................... 37 Chapter 4: Stephen J. Harper ................................................................................. 40 4.1 Harper: The Calgary Years, 1978-1993 ..................................................... 40 4.2 Stephen: The Ottawa Years, 1993-2002 .................................................... 44 Stephen Harper as Rookie MP ....................................................... 44 National Citizens Coalition and the Private Sector .................. 47 The Canadian Alliance: A Return to Federal Politics ............. 49 iii 4.3 Harper’s Breakthrough: The Opposition Years, 2003-2006 ................ 50 Conservative Party Leadership and Belinda Stronach ............ 52 Election Campaign 2004 .................................................................. 53 Election Campaign 2006 .................................................................. 56 Chapter 5: The Premiership of Stephen Harper (2006-2015) .................... 62 5.1 Overview of Events as Prime Minister ...................................................... 62 5.2 Primary Trait Analysis: Authority/Subversion ........................................ 64 Permanent Campaign ........................................................................ 66 Media Suppression ............................................................................ 70 ‘Hierarchizing’ and Subordination................................................ 71 Secrecy, Transparency and Information Control ...................... 74 Censorship, Security and Surveillance ........................................ 78 Consolidation and Concentration of Executive Power ........... 83 5.3 Secondary Trait Analysis: Loyalty and Betrayal .................................... 87 5.4 Conclusions: Trait Analyses on Authority and Loyalty ........................ 91 5.5 The Authoritarian Personality and Further Conclusions....................... 92 Chapter 6: Justin Trudeau and the Moral Mind ............................................ 97 6.1 Family Background and Early Years in Ottawa ...................................... 97 6.2 Justin Trudeau: A Moral Analysis............................................................... 104 Chapter 7: Conclusions and Discussion .............................................................. 112 7.1 Discussion and Executive Summary .......................................................... 112 7.2 Postscript: Bills C-49, C-22, and Policy Recommendations ............... 117 Appendix ........................................................................................................................... 120 Bibliography..................................................................................................................... 122 iv List of Tables Table 5.1, Cases: Permanent Campaign ................................................................... 68 Table 5.2, Cases: Media Suppression ....................................................................... 70 Table 5.3, Cases: ‘Hierarchizing’ and Subordination .......................................... 72 Table 5.4, Cases: Secrecy, Transparency, and Information Control ............... 75 Table 5.5, Cases: Censorship, Security and Surveillance ................................... 79 Table 5.6, Cases: Consolidation/Concentration of Executive Power .............. 84 Table 5.7, Cases: Loyalty and Betrayal ................................................................... 87 Table 2.1, Means, Standard Deviations, and Alphas ............................................ 120 Table 2.2, Pearson Correlations with External Scales and Scale Items .......... 120 Table 2.3, The Five Foundations of Morality ........................................................ 121 v List of Figures Figure 1, The Social Intuitionist Model of Moral Judgment ............................. 23 vi Abstract Jonathan Haidt has redrawn the ‘map of the moral domain’, by positing six heritable foundations that circumscribe one’s moral reasoning. Known as moral foundations theory, Haidt’s model currently lacks any application to Canadian political leadership. The following study seeks to bridge this gap by (psycho-)analyzing Canadian Prime Ministers Stephen Harper and Justin Trudeau through the lens of moral foundations theory. Specifically, it will consider whether the personal character of Canadian political leaders are significant factors in assessing their potential for enacting institutional reform—particularly in the context of moral conservatism. The moral similarities found between Trudeau and Harper contain compelling insights into the superficiality of ‘left- right’ ideological division, ultimately suggesting that differences in moral character may bear greater predictive capacity. Additionally, the findings give credence to the centrality of ‘agency’ in the debate between the roles of institutional structure and individual leadership in the policy-making process. Acknowledgements First I’d like to thank Louise Carbert, for her supervision, open-mindedness and guidance from the start. Second, Frank Harvey, for the much-appreciated nudge toward graduate school. Kristin Good for the thoughtful comments and suggestions over the past year. Robert Finbow, David Black, Steven Seligman, and Katherine Fierlbeck for the helpful feedback. Tracy Powell, for the exceptional support. I thank my fellow classmates: Callee, Erik, Susan, Nick, and Gerhard. Thank you for making this process as enjoyable as it was. Connor, for the much-needed pomodoros. Danika, for more than can be said here. As well, my family, who are responsible for this all. And of course, the moral (immoral?) support provided by my friends, housemates, and the ‘plex fam cannot go unacknowledged. I thank you all. Character is fate —Heraclitus (535-475 BCE) ix Chapter 1: Introduction The following section not only seeks to explain what the proceeding study is, but also to justify its importance. To date, a great body of literature has analyzed political personalities and leadership traits, fitting neatly into the tradition of “elite analysis”. However, little attention has been paid to the substance of elites’ moral psychology. With this study, I intend to carry the tradition of elite analysis into the moral realm. I contend that this will yield greater predictive insights with respect to Canadian public policy, especially those with explicit moral dimensions (e.g., state surveillance, border security, etc.). To this end, Jonathan Haidt’s moral foundations theory will figure prominently. Through this lens, Canadian Prime Ministers Stephen Harper and Justin Trudeau will be used as case studies in which qualitative inferences will be drawn from source material. However, because these subjects haven’t submitted to interviews or questionnaires pertaining to moral foundations theory, I will rely on secondary sources such as biographical and autobiographical texts to draw inferences independently. 1.1 Elite Moral Analysis: What and Why Margaret Hermann does well to point out that when most of us talk politics, we talk about personalities.1 We talk about leaders, candidates, parties, and the ideas they represent. We have a natural interest in the people behind them, which explains why it’s often the personality and not the policy that make for memorable headlines and viral news
Recommended publications
  • Understanding Stephen Harper
    HARPER Edited by Teresa Healy www.policyalternatives.ca Photo: Hanson/THE Tom CANADIAN PRESS Understanding Stephen Harper The long view Steve Patten CANAdIANs Need to understand the political and ideological tem- perament of politicians like Stephen Harper — men and women who aspire to political leadership. While we can gain important insights by reviewing the Harper gov- ernment’s policies and record since the 2006 election, it is also essential that we step back and take a longer view, considering Stephen Harper’s two decades of political involvement prior to winning the country’s highest political office. What does Harper’s long record of engagement in conservative politics tell us about his political character? This chapter is organized around a series of questions about Stephen Harper’s political and ideological character. Is he really, as his support- ers claim, “the smartest guy in the room”? To what extent is he a con- servative ideologue versus being a political pragmatist? What type of conservatism does he embrace? What does the company he keeps tell us about his political character? I will argue that Stephen Harper is an economic conservative whose early political motivations were deeply ideological. While his keen sense of strategic pragmatism has allowed him to make peace with both conservative populism and the tradition- alism of social conservatism, he continues to marginalize red toryism within the Canadian conservative family. He surrounds himself with Governance 25 like-minded conservatives and retains a long-held desire to transform Canada in his conservative image. The smartest guy in the room, or the most strategic? When Stephen Harper first came to the attention of political observers, it was as one of the leading “thinkers” behind the fledgling Reform Party of Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • BACKBENCHERS So in Election Here’S to You, Mr
    Twitter matters American political satirist Stephen Colbert, host of his and even more SPEAKER smash show The Colbert Report, BACKBENCHERS so in Election Here’s to you, Mr. Milliken. poked fun at Canadian House Speaker Peter politics last week. p. 2 Former NDP MP Wendy Lill Campaign 2011. p. 2 Milliken left the House of is the writer behind CBC Commons with a little Radio’s Backbenchers. more dignity. p. 8 COLBERT Heard on the Hill p. 2 TWITTER TWENTY-SECOND YEAR, NO. 1082 CANADA’S POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT NEWSWEEKLY MONDAY, APRIL 4, 2011 $4.00 Tories running ELECTION CAMPAIGN 2011 Lobbyists ‘pissed’ leaner war room, Prime Minister Stephen Harper on the hustings they can’t work on focused on election campaign, winning majority This campaign’s say it’s against their This election campaign’s war room Charter rights has 75 to 90 staffers, with the vast majority handling logistics of about one man Lobbying Commissioner Karen the Prime Minister’s tour. Shepherd tells lobbyists that working on a political By KRISTEN SHANE and how he’s run campaign advances private The Conservatives are running interests of public office holder. a leaner war room and a national campaign made up mostly of cam- the government By BEA VONGDOUANGCHANH paign veterans, some in new roles, whose goal is to persuade Canadi- Lobbyists are “frustrated” they ans to re-elect a “solid, stable Con- can’t work on the federal elec- servative government” to continue It’s a Harperendum, a tion campaign but vow to speak Canada’s economic recovery or risk out against a regulation that they a coalition government headed by national verdict on this think could be an unconstitutional Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff.
    [Show full text]
  • Debates of the Senate
    Debates of the Senate 2nd SESSION . 41st PARLIAMENT . VOLUME 149 . NUMBER 35 OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Wednesday, February 12, 2014 The Honourable NOËL A. KINSELLA Speaker CONTENTS (Daily index of proceedings appears at back of this issue). Debates Services: D'Arcy McPherson, National Press Building, Room 906, Tel. 613-995-5756 Publications Centre: David Reeves, National Press Building, Room 926, Tel. 613-947-0609 Published by the Senate Available on the Internet: http://www.parl.gc.ca 936 THE SENATE Wednesday, February 12, 2014 The Senate met at 1:30 p.m., the Speaker in the chair. Many got involved in the Canadian parliamentary system by working for or sitting as members of the two houses. I'm thinking Prayers. of Senator Pascal Poirier and Senator Calixte Savoie, not to mention the Right Honourable Roméo LeBlanc, who, after sitting [Translation] as a member of the other place and becoming the Speaker of this honourable chamber, rose to the highest office in Canada, that of Governor General. SENATORS' STATEMENTS No doubt senators are familiar with another alumnus of the college, Arthur Beauchesne, a former clerk in the other place and the author of the annotated Rules and Forms of the House of COLLÈGE SAINT-JOSEPH Commons of Canada, who attended Université Saint-Joseph before studying law in Montreal. ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTIETH ANNIVERSARY Honourable senators, please join me in congratulating and Hon. Fernand Robichaud: Honourable senators, I wish to draw thanking the founders of Collège Saint-Joseph, who, 150 years your attention to the 150th anniversary of the founding of ago, laid the foundations for the institute of higher learning that Collège Saint-Joseph in Memramcook, New Brunswick.
    [Show full text]
  • The Victims of Substantive Representation: How "Women's Interests" Influence the Career Paths of Mps in Canada (1997-2011)
    The Victims of Substantive Representation: How "Women's Interests" Influence the Career Paths of MPs in Canada (1997-2011) by Susan Piercey A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts Department of Political Science Memorial University September, 2011 St. John's Newfoundland Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington OttawaONK1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre r&tirence ISBN: 978-0-494-81979-1 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-81979-1 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par Nnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative North Americas: What Canada and The
    ALTERNATIVE NORTH AMERICAS What Canada and the United States Can Learn from Each Other David T. Jones ALTERNATIVE NORTH AMERICAS Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, D.C. 20004 Copyright © 2014 by David T. Jones All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, scanned, or distributed in any printed or electronic form without permission. Please do not participate in or encourage piracy of copyrighted materials in violation of author’s rights. Published online. ISBN: 978-1-938027-36-9 DEDICATION Once more for Teresa The be and end of it all A Journey of Ten Thousand Years Begins with a Single Day (Forever Tandem) TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1 Borders—Open Borders and Closing Threats .......................................... 12 Chapter 2 Unsettled Boundaries—That Not Yet Settled Border ................................ 24 Chapter 3 Arctic Sovereignty—Arctic Antics ............................................................. 45 Chapter 4 Immigrants and Refugees .........................................................................54 Chapter 5 Crime and (Lack of) Punishment .............................................................. 78 Chapter 6 Human Rights and Wrongs .................................................................... 102 Chapter 7 Language and Discord ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Corridor Study Finishes Phase
    TOP 1% IN CANADA SINCE 1991* * for Royal LePage 1 YEAR We specialize in “The Only Choice” TERM DEPOSIT Ceiling Fans & Lighting 2.75% See page 13 ProudProud toto bebe livingliving andand workingworking inin AuroraAurora 905-727-1656 Marilyn Redvers, Sales Representative, Residential Real Estate Services 220 Industrial Pkwy 14799 Yonge St., Aurora 905-727-3154 www.realestateaurora.com 15010 Yonge St. Aurora Royal LePage Your Community Realty, Independently Owned and Operated Brokerage Aurora’s Independent Community Newspaper Vol. 9 No. 35 905-727-3300 auroran.com FREE Week of June 30, 2009 Briefly St. Kitts, Toot, toot committee Richmond Hill Live Steamers, of which several Aurora residents are mem- bers, is a non-profit hobby club of volunteers operating scale model steam and resign from diesel locomotives in Whitchurch-Stouffville. They actually have a model railroad set up in the bush, and you can ride it this weekend. parade Members are inviting train lovers of all ages to take a miniature train ride on Sher St. Kitts, and her seven-person their new extended track through the woods. committee, have tendered their resigna- Action happens Saturday and Sunday, July 4 and July 5, between the hours tion from Aurora’s July First Parade, of 10.30 a.m. and 4 p.m. effective next year. The railroad is located at 15922 McCowan Road (that’s the seventh conces- Ms St. Kitts was instrumental in sion for those who remember), at the corner of St. John's Sideroad, but frankly, it’s easier if you go north from the Aurora Road, also known as Wellington Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Myth Making, Juridification, and Parasitical Discourse: a Barthesian Semiotic Demystification of Canadian Political Discourse on Marijuana
    MYTH MAKING, JURIDIFICATION, AND PARASITICAL DISCOURSE: A BARTHESIAN SEMIOTIC DEMYSTIFICATION OF CANADIAN POLITICAL DISCOURSE ON MARIJUANA DANIEL PIERRE-CHARLES CRÉPAULT Thesis submitted to the University of Ottawa in partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctorate in Philosophy degree in Criminology Department of Criminology Faculty of Social Sciences University of Ottawa © Daniel Pierre-Charles Crépault, Ottawa, Canada, 2019 ABSTRACT The legalization of marijuana in Canada represents a significant change in the course of Canadian drug policy. Using a semiotic approach based on the work of Roland Barthes, this dissertation explores marijuana’s signification within the House of Commons and Senate debates between 1891 and 2018. When examined through this conceptual lens, the ongoing parliamentary debates about marijuana over the last 127 years are revealed to be rife with what Barthes referred to as myths, ideas that have become so familiar that they cease to be recognized as constructions and appear innocent and natural. Exploring one such myth—the necessity of asserting “paternal power” over individuals deemed incapable of rational calculation—this dissertation demonstrates that the processes of political debate and law-making are also a complex “politics of signification” in which myths are continually being invoked, (re)produced, and (re)transmitted. The evolution of this myth is traced to the contemporary era and it is shown that recent attempts to criminalize, decriminalize, and legalize marijuana are indices of a process of juridification that is entrenching legal regulation into increasingly new areas of Canadian life in order to assert greater control over the consumption of marijuana and, importantly, over the risks that this activity has been semiologically associated with.
    [Show full text]
  • The Harper Casebook
    — 1 — biogra HOW TO BECOME STEPHEN HARPER A step-by-step guide National Citizens Coalition • Quits Parliament in 1997 to become a vice- STEPHEN JOSEPH HARPER is the current president, then president, of the NCC. and 22nd Prime Minister of Canada. He has • Co-author, with Tom Flanagan, of “Our Benign been the Member of Parliament (MP) for the Dictatorship,” an opinion piece that calls for an Alberta riding of Calgary Southwest since alliance of Canada’s conservative parties, and 2002. includes praise for Conrad Black’s purchase of the Southam newspaper chain, as a needed counter • First minority government in 2006 to the “monophonically liberal and feminist” • Second minority government in 2008 approach of the previous management. • First majority government in May 2011 • Leads NCC in a legal battle to permit third-party advertising in elections. • Says “Canada is a Northern European welfare Early life and education state in the worst sense of the term, and very • Born and raised in Toronto, father an accountant proud of it,” in a 1997 speech on Canadian at Imperial Oil. identity to the Council for National Policy, a • Has a master’s degree in economics from the conservative American think-tank. University of Calgary. Canadian Alliance Political beginnings • Campaigns for leadership of Canadian Alliance: • Starts out as a Liberal, switches to Progressive argues for “parental rights” to use corporal Conservative, then to Reform. punishment against their children; describes • Runs, and loses, as Reform candidate in 1988 his potential support base as “similar to what federal election. George Bush tapped.” • Resigns as Reform policy chief in 1992; but runs, • Becomes Alliance leader: wins by-election in and wins, for Reform in 1993 federal election— Calgary Southwest; becomes Leader of the thanks to a $50,000 donation from the ultra Opposition in the House of Commons in May conservative National Citizens Coalition (NCC).
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Year Ahead
    2021 YEAR AHEAD Claudio Brocado Anthony Brocado January 29, 2021 1 2020 turned out to be quite unusual. What may the year ahead and beyond bring? As the year got started, the consensus was that a strong 2019 for equities would be followed by a positive first half, after which meaningful volatility would kick in due to the US presidential election. In the spirit of our prefer- ence for a contrarian stance, we had expected somewhat the opposite: some profit-taking in the first half of 2020, followed by a rally that would result in a positive balance at year-end. But in the way of the markets – which always tend to catch the largest number of participants off guard – we had what some would argue was one of the strangest years in recent memory. 2 2020 turned out to be a very eventful year. The global virus crisis (GVC) brought about by the coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic was something no serious market observer had anticipated as 2020 got started. Volatility had been all but nonexistent early in what we call ‘the new 20s’, which had led us to expect the few remaining volatile asset classes, such as cryptocurrencies, to benefit from the search for more extreme price swings. We had expected volatilities across asset classes to show some convergence. The markets delivered, but not in the direction we had expected. Volatilities surged higher across many assets, with the CBOE volatility index (VIX) reaching some of the highest readings in many years. As it became clear that what was commonly called the novel coronavirus would bring about a pandemic as it spread to the remotest corners of the world at record speeds, the markets feared the worst.
    [Show full text]
  • SFU Thesis Template Files
    The Right to Authentic Political Communication by Ann Elizabeth Rees M.A., Simon Fraser University, 2005 B.A., Simon Fraser University, 1980 Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Communication Faculty of Arts and Social Science Ann Elizabeth Rees 2016 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Spring 2016 Approval Name: Ann Elizabeth Rees Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Title: The Right to Authentic Political Communication Examining Committee: Chair: Katherine Reilly, Assistant Professor Peter Anderson Senior Supervisor Associate Professor Catherine Murray Supervisor Professor Alison Beale Supervisor Professor Andrew Heard Internal Examiner Associate Professor Political Science Department Paul Thomas External Examiner Professor Emeritus Department of Political Studies University of Manitoba Date Defended/Approved: January 22, 2016 ii Abstract Increasingly, governments communicate strategically with the public for political advantage, seeking as Christopher Hood describes it to “avoid blame” and “claim credit” for the actions and decisions of governance. In particular, Strategic Political Communication (SPC) is becoming the dominant form of political communication between Canada’s executive branch of government and the public, both during elections and as part of a “permanent campaign” to gain and maintain public support as means to political power. This dissertation argues that SPC techniques interfere with the public’s ability to know how they are governed, and therefore undermines the central right of citizens in a democracy to legitimate elected representation by scrutinizing government and holding it to account. Realization of that right depends on an authentic political communication process that provides citizens with an understanding of government. By seeking to hide or downplay blameworthy actions, SPC undermines the legitimation role public discourse plays in a democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2006 Federal Liberal and Alberta Conservative Leadership Campaigns
    Choice or Consensus?: The 2006 Federal Liberal and Alberta Conservative Leadership Campaigns Jared J. Wesley PhD Candidate Department of Political Science University of Calgary Paper for Presentation at: The Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan May 30, 2007 Comments welcome. Please do not cite without permission. CHOICE OR CONSENSUS?: THE 2006 FEDERAL LIBERAL AND ALBERTA CONSERVATIVE LEADERSHIP CAMPAIGNS INTRODUCTION Two of Canada’s most prominent political dynasties experienced power-shifts on the same weekend in December 2006. The Liberal Party of Canada and the Progressive Conservative Party of Alberta undertook leadership campaigns, which, while different in context, process and substance, produced remarkably similar outcomes. In both instances, so-called ‘dark-horse’ candidates emerged victorious, with Stéphane Dion and Ed Stelmach defeating frontrunners like Michael Ignatieff, Bob Rae, Jim Dinning, and Ted Morton. During the campaigns and since, Dion and Stelmach have been labeled as less charismatic than either their predecessors or their opponents, and both of the new leaders have drawn skepticism for their ability to win the next general election.1 This pair of surprising results raises interesting questions about the nature of leadership selection in Canada. Considering that each race was run in an entirely different context, and under an entirely different set of rules, which common factors may have contributed to the similar outcomes? The following study offers a partial answer. In analyzing the platforms of the major contenders in each campaign, the analysis suggests that candidates’ strategies played a significant role in determining the results. Whereas leading contenders opted to pursue direct confrontation over specific policy issues, Dion and Stelmach appeared to benefit by avoiding such conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Donald Trump, the Changes: Aanti
    Ethnic and Racial Studies ISSN: 0141-9870 (Print) 1466-4356 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rers20 Donald Trump, the anti-Muslim far right and the new conservative revolution Ed Pertwee To cite this article: Ed Pertwee (2020): Donald Trump, the anti-Muslim far right and the new conservative revolution, Ethnic and Racial Studies, DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2020.1749688 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2020.1749688 © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 17 Apr 2020. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 193 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rers20 ETHNIC AND RACIAL STUDIES https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2020.1749688 Donald Trump, the anti-Muslim far right and the new conservative revolution Ed Pertwee Department of Sociology, London School of Economics, London, UK ABSTRACT This article explores the “counter-jihad”, a transnational field of anti-Muslim political action that emerged in the mid-2000s, becoming a key tributary of the recent far- right insurgency and an important influence on the Trump presidency. The article draws on thematic analysis of content from counter-jihad websites and interviews with movement activists, sympathizers and opponents, in order to characterize the counter-jihad’s organizational infrastructure and political discourse and to theorize its relationship to fascism and other far-right tendencies. Although the political discourses of the counter-jihad, Trumpian Republicanism and the avowedly racist “Alt-Right” are not identical, I argue that all three tendencies share a common, counterrevolutionary temporal structure.
    [Show full text]