ARROW and the FOUNDATIONS of the THEORY of ECONOMIC POLICY Also by George R

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ARROW and the FOUNDATIONS of the THEORY of ECONOMIC POLICY Also by George R ARROW AND THE FOUNDATIONS OF THE THEORY OF ECONOMIC POLICY Also by George R. Feiwel *ARROW AND THE ASCENT OF MODERN ECONOMIC THEORY (companion volume) *ISSUES IN CONTEMPORARY MACROECONOMICS AND WELFARE (editor) *ISSUES IN CONTEMPORARY MACROECONOMICS AND DISTRIBUTION (editor) SAMUELSON AND NEOCLASSICAL ECONOMICS (editor) THE INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL OF MICHAL KALECKI GROWTH AND REFORMS IN CENTRALLY PLANNED ECONOMIES THE SOVIET QUEST FOR ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY INDUSTRIALIZATION AND PLANNING UNDER POLISH SOCIALISM (2 volumes) NEW ECONOMIC PATTERNS IN CZECHOSLOVAKIA THE ECONOMICS OF A SOCIALIST ENTERPRISE In preparation *JOAN ROBINSON AND MODERN ECONOMIC THEORY (editor) *IMPERFECT COMPETITION REVISITED: JOAN ROBINSON AND BEYOND (editor) *Also published by Palgrave Macmillan Kenneth J. Arrow Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy Edited by George R. Feiwel Alumni Distinguished Service Professor and Professor of Economics, University of Tennessee M MACMILLAN PRESS © George R. Feiwel 1987 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1987 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1956 (as amended). Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. First published 1987 Published by THE MACMILLAN PRESS LTD Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG2l 2XS and London Companies and representatives throughout the world British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Arrow and the foundations of the theory of economic policy l. Arrow, Kenneth J. 2. Economics I. Feiwel, George R. 330.1 HBll9.A75 ISBN 978-1-349-07359-7 ISBN 978-1-349-07357-3 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-07357-3 Two-volume set ISBN 978-0-333-42410-0 'The Theory of Economics does not furnish a body of settled conclusions immediately applicable to policy. It is a method rather than a doctrine, a technique of thinking, which helps its possessor to draw correct conclusions.' JoHN MAYNARD KEYNES 'Practical interest in welfare economics has always rested on its role in putting debates on economic policy on a deeper foundation. Arrow's formulation of the problem makes that deeper foundation explicit, and his approach is of central importance to economic policymaking.' AMARTYA SEN 'If I am not for myself, then who is for me? And if I am not for others then who am I? And if not now, when?' RABBI HILLEL Contents Notes on the Contributors xvii Preface xxxiii 1A The Many Dimensions of Kenneth J. Arrow 1 George R. Feiwel 1 Formative Years 2 1.1 Background and Early Outlook 2 1.2 City College and Columbia 9 1.3 Cowles and Rand 15 2 An Impressionistic Portrait of the Man and Scholar 23 3 Values and Opportunities 41 4 Design of Organization 51 4.1 What is an Organization? 52 4.2 Externalities, Transaction Costs, Property Rights, and Profit 55 4.3 Market Failure and Non-market Organizations 67 4.4 Government and Economic Policy 70 5 Freedom, Equality, and Democracy 79 6 Distributive Justice and Efficiency 89 1B Social Choice: the Science of the Impossible? 116 Peter J. Hammond 1 Introduction 116 2 Background 117 3 The Borda Rule and Irrelevant Alternatives 119 4 Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives 122 5 Is Dictatorship the Only General Possibility? 123 6 Interpersonal Comparisons and Independence of Irrelevant Utilities 125 7 Which Alternatives are Relevant? 127 8 Conclusion 128 PART 1: SOCIAL CHOICE, UTILITARIANISM, AND BEYOND 2 Ordinal Utilitarianism 135 Allan F. Gibbard 1 The Problem 137 2 Dividing a Cake 139 Vll Vlll Contents 3 The Egalitarian Planet 141 4 The Bases of Moral Concern 143 5 Epistemological Worries 145 6 Quantities, Norms, and Economics 147 7 Paretian Income Distribution 149 3 Sparks from Arrow's Anvil 154 Paul A. Samuelson 1 Lerner-Vickrey-Samuelson (L-V-S) 'Extended Sympathy' 155 2 No Necessity for Additive Utilities 157 3 Taking the Sympathy Out of 'Extended Sympathy' 157 4 Lerner's Way 159 5 A Better Way? 160 6 Harsanyi's Additive Ethics 161 7 The Bentham-Harsanyi Straitjacket 163 8 Rawls's Gratuitism 166 9 Foley-Varian Fairness 168 10 Relevance of So-called Irrelevants? 169 11 Finale 171 4 On Reconciling Arrow's Theory of Social Choice With Harsanyi's Fundamental Utilitarianism 179 Peter J. Hammond 1 Introduction and Outline 179 2 Motivation for Consequentialism 183 3 Consequentialism and Ordinal Choice 184 4 Consequentialism and Expected Utility 188 5 Social Choice of Interpersonal Consequences 189 6 Individual Norms and Ethical Liberalism 190 7 An 'Idealized' Vickrey-Harsanyi Utilitarianism 193 8 The Fundamental Individual Norm and Harsanyi's Utilitarianism in Idealized Form 195 9 Independence of Irrelevant Althernatives and Dictatorship 198 10 Independence of Ethically Irrelevant Consequences 200 11 Domain Restrictions Implied by Ethical Liberalism and the Fundamental Individual Norm 203 12 Ethical Dictatorship of the Fundamental Individual Norm 205 13 Consumer Sovereignty, Attitudes to Risk, and the Distribution of Income 208 Contents IX 14 Risk-Taking Behaviour and the Basic Theorems of Classical Welfare Economics 210 15 Conclusion 214 5 Arrow's Independence Condition and the Bergson-Samuelson Tradition 223 Murray Kemp and Yew-Kwang Ng 1 The Three Components of Condition IIA: Individualism, Ordinalism, and Independence 224 2 The Bergson-Samuelson Tradition Implies All Three Components 228 3 Samuelson's and Mayston's Counter Arguments 230 Appendix: Arrow, Samuelson, and Ordinalism 235 I Background 236 2 Ordinalism in Name 236 3 Ordinalism in Substance 238 6 Maximizing Freedom of Decision: an Axiomatic Analysis 243 Patrick Suppes 1 Axioms on Freedom 244 1.1 Basic Concepts 244 1.2Axioms 244 2 Models of the Axioms 245 2.1 Benthamite Maximizer 247 2.2 Cardinality Maximizer 248 2.3 Qua-Maximizer 248 3 Aggregation of Freedom Preferences 249 4 Approximate Measurement of Freedom 251 7 Arrow and the Problem of Social Choice 255 Kotaro Suzumura and Koichi Suga 1 Introduction 255 2 Pareto Libertarian Paradox: hie rhodus, hie salta 256 3 Golden Rule: First Interpretation 258 4 Golden Rule: Second Interpretation 259 5 A Formal Model of Social Decision Making 262 6 Conclusion 268 8 Utilitarianism and Modern Economics 273 Gunnar M yrdal X Contents PART II: WELFARE AND DISTRIBUTION 9 The Optimum Order Revisited 281 Jan Tinbergen 1 Scope and Nature of the Subject 281 1.1 Why Revisit the Subject? 281 1.2 The Concept of Social Order and the Variables Entering its Analysis 282 1.3 Institutions, their Operation Equations, and the Optimal Order 283 1.4 Scientific Strategy Chosen 284 1.5 Notation Used in Illustrative Models 286 1.6 Organization of the Argument 287 2 Relevance of the Concept of an Optimal Social Order 288 2.1 Co-existence of Many Differing Social Orders 288 2.2 Opinions on Optimal Social Order 289 2.3 An Optional Social Order as a Long-term Goal 290 2.4 Changes in Data and Preferences 290 2.5 Changes in Different Cultures 291 2.6 Conclusion 292 3 Variables, Relations, and Simplifying Assumptions 292 3.1 Goods and Services, Private or Collective; Role in Welfare Functions 292 3.2 Actors, Production Factors; Workers and Occupations; Learning 293 3.3 Production Processes; Hierarchies; Counterproduction; Production Functions 295 3.4 Welfare: its Measurement, Determinants, and Aggregation 297 3.5 The Social Welfare Function 298 3.6 Externalities and the Costs of Institutions 299 3. 7 Role of Ownership 300 4 Aspects of the Optimal Order 301 4.1 The Role of Markets; Two-part Pricing as a General Device 301 4.2 Labour of Different Qualities and Occupations 303 4.3 Private and Collective Goods 308 4.4 Income Redistribution; Equity 312 4.5 The International Division of Labour 314 4.6 Optimum Level of Decision Making 316 Contents xi 4. 7 Dynamics of the Optimum Order; Exhaustibility of Resources 317 5 Relevant Differences Between Optimal and Existing Orders 319 5.1 Introduction; Discrimination 3I9 5.2 Oligopolies 320 5.3 Deviations in Redistribution 321 5.4 Non-optimal Collective Sector 322 5.5 International Division of Labour 323 5.6 Decision Structure 323 10 Information, Welfare, and Product Diversity 328 Steven C. Salop and Joseph E. Stiglitz 1 Introduction 328 2 The Model 330 3 Effects of Reducing the Cost of Information 334 4 Effect of Imperfect Information on the Value of Diversity 336 5 Conclusion 339 11 On the Fair Allocation of Indivisible Goods 341 Eric S. Maskin 1 Introduction 341 2 The Model 342 3 Fair Allocations 345 12 Income Distribution and Differences in Needs 350 Anthony B. Atkinson and Franfois Bourguignon I Introduction 350 2 Dominance for All Groups 352 3 The Interrelation Between Income and Needs 356 4 Second-degree Dominance for Incomes 359 5 Second-degree Dominance for Needs 364 6 Conclusion 366 Appendix: Necessity of Dominance Conditions 367 13 When is a Fixed Income Distribution Optimal? 371 John S. Chipman I Introduction 371 2 Formulation and Solution of the Problem 373 3 Conclusion 378 Xll Contents 14 Peak Pricing, Congestion, and Fairness 382 William J. Baumol and Dietrich Fischer 1 Fairness and Peak Pricing 383 1.1 On the Criteria of Equity 383 1.2 The Possibility of Pareto Improvement in the Classical Peak-Pricing Model 385 1.3 Sufficient Conditions for Peak Pricing not to be a Pareto Improvement 385 1.4 Cases where Peak Pricing can be a Pareto Improvement 388 1.5 Pareto Improvement under Scale Diseconomies 389
Recommended publications
  • TECHNOLOGY and GROWTH: an OVERVIEW Jeffrey C
    Y Proceedings GY Conference Series No. 40 Jeffrey C. Fuhrer Jane Sneddon Little Editors CONTENTS TECHNOLOGY AND GROWTH: AN OVERVIEW Jeffrey C. Fuhrer and Jane Sneddon Little KEYNOTE ADDRESS: THE NETWORKED BANK 33 Robert M. Howe TECHNOLOGY IN GROWTH THEORY Dale W. Jorgenson Discussion 78 Susanto Basu Gene M. Grossman UNCERTAINTY AND TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE 91 Nathan Rosenberg Discussion 111 Joel Mokyr Luc L.G. Soete CROSS-COUNTRY VARIATIONS IN NATIONAL ECONOMIC GROWTH RATES," THE ROLE OF aTECHNOLOGYtr 127 J. Bradford De Long~ Discussion 151 Jeffrey A. Frankel Adam B. Jaffe ADDRESS: JOB ~NSECURITY AND TECHNOLOGY173 Alan Greenspan MICROECONOMIC POLICY AND TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE 183 Edwin Mansfield Discnssion 201 Samuel S. Kortum Joshua Lerner TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION IN U.S. MANUFACTURING: THE GEOGRAPHIC DIMENSION 215 Jane Sneddon Little and Robert K. Triest Discussion 260 John C. Haltiwanger George N. Hatsopoulos PANEL DISCUSSION 269 Trends in Productivity Growth 269 Martin Neil Baily Inherent Conflict in International Trade 279 Ralph E. Gomory Implications of Growth Theory for Macro-Policy: What Have We Learned? 286 Abel M. Mateus The Role of Macroeconomic Policy 298 Robert M. Solow About the Authors Conference Participants 309 TECHNOLOGY AND GROWTH: AN OVERVIEW Jeffrey C. Fuhrer and Jane Sneddon Little* During the 1990s, the Federal Reserve has pursued its twin goals of price stability and steady employment growth with considerable success. But despite--or perhaps because of--this success, concerns about the pace of economic and productivity growth have attracted renewed attention. Many observers ruefully note that the average pace of GDP growth has remained below rates achieved in the 1960s and that a period of rapid investment in computers and other capital equipment has had disappointingly little impact on the productivity numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • Coasean Fictions: Law and Economics Revisited
    Seattle Journal for Social Justice Volume 5 Issue 2 Article 28 May 2007 Coasean Fictions: Law and Economics Revisited Alejandro Nadal Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sjsj Recommended Citation Nadal, Alejandro (2007) "Coasean Fictions: Law and Economics Revisited," Seattle Journal for Social Justice: Vol. 5 : Iss. 2 , Article 28. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sjsj/vol5/iss2/28 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Publications and Programs at Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Seattle Journal for Social Justice by an authorized editor of Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 569 Coasean Fictions: Law and Economics Revisited Alejandro Nadal1 After the 1960s, a strong academic movement developed in the United States around the idea that the study of the law, as well as legal practice, could be strengthened through economic analysis.2 This trend was started through the works of R.H. Coase and Guido Calabresi, and grew with later developments introduced by Richard Posner and Robert D. Cooter, as well as Gary Becker.3 Law and Economics (L&E) is the name given to the application of modern economics to legal analysis and practice. Proponents of L&E have portrayed the movement as improving clarity and logic in legal analysis, and even as a tool to modify the conceptual categories used by lawyers and courts to think about
    [Show full text]
  • Kenneth J. Arrow [Ideological Profiles of the Economics Laureates] Daniel B
    Kenneth J. Arrow [Ideological Profiles of the Economics Laureates] Daniel B. Klein Econ Journal Watch 10(3), September 2013: 268-281 Abstract Kenneth J. Arrow is among the 71 individuals who were awarded the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel between 1969 and 2012. This ideological profile is part of the project called “The Ideological Migration of the Economics Laureates,” which fills the September 2013 issue of Econ Journal Watch. Keywords Classical liberalism, economists, Nobel Prize in economics, ideology, ideological migration, intellectual biography. JEL classification A11, A13, B2, B3 Link to this document http://econjwatch.org/file_download/715/ArrowIPEL.pdf ECON JOURNAL WATCH Kenneth J. Arrow by Daniel B. Klein Ross Starr begins his article on Kenneth Arrow (1921–) in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics by saying that he “is a legendary figure, with an enormous range of contributions to 20th-century economics…. His impact is suggested by the number of major ideas that bear his name: Arrow’s Theorem, the Arrow- Debreu model, the Arrow-Pratt index of risk aversion, and Arrow securities” (Starr 2008). Besides the four areas alluded to in the quotation from Starr, Arrow has been a leader in the economics of information. In 1972, at the age of 51 (still the youngest ever), Arrow shared the Nobel Prize in economics with John Hicks for their contributions to general economic equilibrium theory and welfare theory. But if the Nobel economics prize were given for specific accomplishments, and an individual could win repeatedly, Arrow would surely have several. It has been shown that Arrow is the economics laureate who has been most cited within the Nobel award lectures of the economics laureates (Skarbek 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • The Death of Welfare Economics: History of a Controversy
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Igersheim, Herrade Working Paper The death of welfare economics: History of a controversy CHOPE Working Paper, No. 2017-03 Provided in Cooperation with: Center for the History of Political Economy at Duke University Suggested Citation: Igersheim, Herrade (2017) : The death of welfare economics: History of a controversy, CHOPE Working Paper, No. 2017-03, Duke University, Center for the History of Political Economy (CHOPE), Durham, NC This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/155466 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu The death of welfare economics: History of a controversy by Herrade Igersheim CHOPE Working Paper No. 2017-03 January 2017 Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2901574 The death of welfare economics: history of a controversy Herrade Igersheim December 15, 2016 Abstract.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 11 Eric S. Maskin
    Chapter 11 Eric S. Maskin BIOGRAPHY ERIC S. MASKIN, USA ECONOMICS, 2007 When seeking a solution to a problem it is possible, particularly in a non-specific field such as economics, to come up with several plausible answers. One may stand out as the most likely candi- date, but it may also be worth pursuing other options – indeed, this is a central strand of John Nash’s game theory, romantically illustrated in the film A Beautiful Mind. R. M. Solow et al. (eds.), Economics for the Curious © Foundation Lindau Nobelprizewinners Meeting at Lake Constance 2014 160 ERIC S. MASKIN Eric Maskin, along with Leonid Hurwicz and Roger Myerson, was awarded the 2007 Nobel Prize in Economics for their related work on mechanism design theory, a mathematical system for analyzing the best way to align incentives between parties. This not only helps when designing contracts between individuals but also when planning effective government regulation. Maskin’s contribution was the development of implementa- tion theory for achieving particular social or economic goals by encouraging conditions under which all equilibria are opti- mal. Maskin came up with his theory early in his career, after his PhD advisor, Nobel Laureate Kenneth Arrow, introduced him to Leonid Hurwicz. Maskin explains: ‘I got caught up in a problem inspired by the work of Leo Hurwicz: under what cir- cumstance is it possible to design a mechanism (that is, a pro- cedure or game) that implements a given social goal, or social choice rule? I finally realized that monotonicity (now sometimes called ‘Maskin monotonicity’) was the key: if a social choice rule doesn't satisfy monotonicity, then it is not implementable; and if it does satisfy this property it is implementable provided no veto power, a weak requirement, also holds.
    [Show full text]
  • Putting Innovation Incentives Back in the Patent-Antitrust Interface, 11 Nw
    Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property Volume 11 | Issue 5 Article 5 2013 Putting Innovation Incentives Back in the Patent- Antitrust Interface Thomas Cheng University of Hong Kong Recommended Citation Thomas Cheng, Putting Innovation Incentives Back in the Patent-Antitrust Interface, 11 Nw. J. Tech. & Intell. Prop. 385 (2013). https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njtip/vol11/iss5/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern Pritzker School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property by an authorized editor of Northwestern Pritzker School of Law Scholarly Commons. NORTHWESTERN J O U R N A L OF TECHNOLOGY AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Putting Innovation Incentives Back in the Patent-Antitrust Interface Thomas Cheng April 2013 VOL. 11, NO. 5 © 2013 by Northwestern University School of Law Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property Copyright 2013 by Northwestern University School of Law Volume 11, Number 5 (April 2013) Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property Putting Innovation Incentives Back in the Patent-Antitrust Interface By Thomas Cheng* This Article proposes a new approach, the constrained maximization approach, to the patent-antitrust interface. It advocates a return to the utilitarian premise of the patent system, which posits that innovation incentives are preserved so long as the costs of innovation are recovered. While this premise is widely accepted, it is seldom applied by the courts in patent-antitrust cases. The result is that courts and commentators have been overly deferential to dynamic efficiency arguments in defense of patent exploitation practices, and have failed to scrutinize the extent to which patentee reward is genuinely essential to generating innovation incentives.
    [Show full text]
  • Paul Samuelson's Ways to Macroeconomic Dynamics
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Boianovsky, Mauro Working Paper Paul Samuelson's ways to macroeconomic dynamics CHOPE Working Paper, No. 2019-08 Provided in Cooperation with: Center for the History of Political Economy at Duke University Suggested Citation: Boianovsky, Mauro (2019) : Paul Samuelson's ways to macroeconomic dynamics, CHOPE Working Paper, No. 2019-08, Duke University, Center for the History of Political Economy (CHOPE), Durham, NC This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/196831 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Paul Samuelson’s Ways to Macroeconomic Dynamics by Mauro Boianovsky CHOPE Working Paper No. 2019-08 May 2019 Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3386201 1 Paul Samuelson’s ways to macroeconomic dynamics Mauro Boianovsky (Universidade de Brasilia) [email protected] First preliminary draft.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Diversity and Interdependent Crop Choices in Agriculture
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Geoffrey Heal, Brian Walker, Simon Levin, Kenneth Arrow, Partha Dasgupta, Gretchen Daily, Paul Ehrlich, Karl-Goran Maler, Nils Kautsky, Jane Lubchenco, Steve Schneider and David Starrett Working Paper Genetic diversity and interdependent crop choices in agriculture Nota di Lavoro, No. 100.2002 Provided in Cooperation with: Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) Suggested Citation: Geoffrey Heal, Brian Walker, Simon Levin, Kenneth Arrow, Partha Dasgupta, Gretchen Daily, Paul Ehrlich, Karl-Goran Maler, Nils Kautsky, Jane Lubchenco, Steve Schneider and David Starrett (2002) : Genetic diversity and interdependent crop choices in agriculture, Nota di Lavoro, No. 100.2002, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM), Milano This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/119708 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future Comeback of Competition Law and Public Policy
    The future comeback of competition law and public policy: Julian Nowag Lund University and CCLP Aquila Outline Argument: More and not less of such questions 1. A reminder: traditional thinking about firms, competition law and the public good 2. Three challenges 3. Options for competition law Theoretical foundations in competition law about the public good Contributing to the Public Good Economics Provides Private Goods Provides Public Goods (non-excludable, non-rivalrous) Constitutional No democratic legitimacy (democratically) accountable claim: concerned about profits legitimacy Traditional theories of firm as subject of competition law Where do these ideas stem from? • Neo classical theory: – Adam Smith: – Kenneth Arrow & Frank H Hahn: – Profit maximization = total welfare maximization Externalities: State legislation • Libertarian: – Milton Friedman: ‘The social responsibility of business is to increase profit’ 1st Challenge: CSR • Howard Bowman (1950): social responsibility of the firm ‘an obligation to follow the course of action that is desirable in terms of objectives and values of the society’ • (P) green washing • But: Business case for CSR eg. – Global warming as threat to business minimizing impact as long term business strategy – More demand for environmentally friendly products + higher energy costs = market forces drives firms to be more environmentally friendly 1st Challenge: CSR and business Example: CSR and business Origin Materials Organic waste materials PET eg sawdust 2nd Challenge: social enterprise 1983: Muhammad
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Economics and Social Complexity Science
    Evolutionary Economics and Social Complexity Science Volume 18 Editors-in-Chief Takahiro Fujimoto, Tokyo, Japan Yuji Aruka, Tokyo, Japan The Japanese Association for Evolutionary Economics (JAFEE) always has adhered to its original aim of taking an explicit “integrated” approach. This path has been followed steadfastly since the Association’s establishment in 1997 and, as well, since the inauguration of our international journal in 2004. We have deployed an agenda encompassing a contemporary array of subjects including but not limited to: foundations of institutional and evolutionary economics, criticism of mainstream views in the social sciences, knowledge and learning in socio-economic life, devel- opment and innovation of technologies, transformation of industrial organizations and economic systems, experimental studies in economics, agent-based modeling of socio-economic systems, evolution of the governance structure of firms and other organizations, comparison of dynamically changing institutions of the world, and policy proposals in the transformational process of economic life. In short, our starting point is an “integrative science” of evolutionary and institutional views. Furthermore, we always endeavor to stay abreast of newly established methods such as agent-based modeling, socio/econo-physics, and network analysis as part of our integrative links. More fundamentally, “evolution” in social science is interpreted as an essential key word, i.e., an integrative and /or communicative link to understand and re-domain various preceding
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections on the LSE Tradition in Econometrics: a Student's Perspective Réflexions Sur La Tradition De La LSE En Économétrie : Le Point De Vue D'un Étudiant
    Œconomia History, Methodology, Philosophy 4-3 | 2014 History of Econometrics Reflections on the LSE Tradition in Econometrics: a Student's Perspective Réflexions sur la tradition de la LSE en économétrie : Le point de vue d'un étudiant Aris Spanos Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/oeconomia/922 DOI: 10.4000/oeconomia.922 ISSN: 2269-8450 Publisher Association Œconomia Printed version Date of publication: 1 September 2014 Number of pages: 343-380 ISSN: 2113-5207 Electronic reference Aris Spanos, « Reflections on the LSE Tradition in Econometrics: a Student's Perspective », Œconomia [Online], 4-3 | 2014, Online since 01 September 2014, connection on 28 December 2020. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/oeconomia/922 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/oeconomia.922 Les contenus d’Œconomia sont mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International. Reflections on the LSE Tradition in Econometrics: a Student’s Perspective Aris Spanos∗ Since the mid 1960s the LSE tradition, led initially by Denis Sargan and later by David Hendry, has contributed several innovative tech- niques and modeling strategies to applied econometrics. A key feature of the LSE tradition has been its striving to strike a balance between the theory-oriented perspective of textbook econometrics and the ARIMA data-oriented perspective of time series analysis. The primary aim of this article is to provide a student’s perspective on this tradition. It is argued that its key contributions and its main call to take the data more seriously can be formally justified on sound philosophical grounds and provide a coherent framework for empirical modeling in economics.
    [Show full text]
  • To the State of Economic Science: Views of Six Nobel Laureates]
    Upjohn Press Book Chapters Upjohn Research home page 1-1-1989 Introduction [to The State of Economic Science: Views of Six Nobel Laureates] Werner Sichel Western Michigan University Follow this and additional works at: https://research.upjohn.org/up_bookchapters Citation Sichel, Werner. 1989. "Introduction." In The State of Economic Science: Views of Six Nobel Laureates, Werner Sichel, ed. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.17848/9780880995962.intro This title is brought to you by the Upjohn Institute. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WERNER SICHEL is Professor of Economics and Chair of the Department of Economics at Western Michigan University. His field of specialty is industrial organization. Professor Sichel earned a B.S. degree from New York University and M.A. and Ph.D. degrees from Northwestern University. In 1968-69 he was a Fulbright-Hays senior lecturer at the University of Belgrade in Yugoslavia and in 1984-85 was a Visiting Scholar at the Hoover In stitution, Stanford University. Dr. Sichel is a past president of the Economics Society of Michigan and is the current president of the Midwest Business Economics Associa tion. For the past decade he has served as a consultant to a major law firm with regard to antitrust litigation. He presently serves on the Editorial Advisory Board of the Antitrust Law and Economics Review. Professor Sichel has published a number of articles in scholarly jour nals and books and is the author or editor of about 15 books. His books include a popular principles text, Economics, coauthored with Martin Bronfenbrenner and Wayland Gardner; Basic Economic Concepts, coauthored with Peter Eckstein, which has been translated into Spanish and Chinese and is currently the most widely used "Western Economics" text in China, and Economics Journals and Serials: An Analytical Guide, coauthored with his wife, Beatrice.
    [Show full text]