Early Parliamentary Elections February 9, 2020

INSTITUTE FOR DEMOCRATIC INITIATIVES (IDI)

EARLY PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS FEBRUARY 9, 2020

II INTERIM REPORT (January 17, 2020 - February 07, 2020)

BAKU FEBRUARY 8, 2020

1 I. SUMMARY

No progress has been made in the pre-election campaign to ensure political freedoms, in particular, freedom of speech and press and freedom of assembly, and those who are considered as political prisoners were not released.

During the reporting period, the Central Election Commission (CEC) continued its preparations for the forthcoming elections and technically carried out its activities according to the law and during the legal period. However, it could not ensure equal conditions for candidates during the pre-election campaign.

The update of voter lists was finished on January 15 with 5,238,000 people in 125 constituencies. 25,098 voters were added to the list. The figure released by the CEC is still drastically different from the figure released by the State Statistics Committee.

According to IDI observations, voter lists were not placed at precincts in some election constituencies or it is impossible to see those lists due to the areas they were placed. Furthermore, some polling stations were closed during working hours.

313 people withdrew their nominations within a very short time. Observations show that mass and immediate withdrawal of candidates creates doubt that the process will be carried out by instruction. This conclusion has also been come by the fact that most candidates, who withdrew, work in state-financed offices and enterprises.

As a result of the IDI monitoring, it was identified that the number of candidates who continue to participate in the election is 1,305.

The National Council, an important part of the opposition, does not participate in the elections and has not held any mass action during this period. The activities of other leading opposition parties, the Musavat Party, the Real Party, and others, have focused more on electoral constituencies and have not carried out any large-scale public events. As a result, the opportunity to conduct a pre-election campaign in a transparent, fair, and equitable environment was lost for political parties that oppose each other.

Observers working with IDI recorded various violations during the pre-election campaign during long-term observation of 78 constituencies in the country. The pre-election campaign was accompanied by interferences by local executive bodies in the election process, pressure on opposition candidates and their campaigners, the use of administrative resources, and the violation of the principle of equality among candidates.

No election campaign was conducted by opposition or real independent candidate in 40 constituencies. This is actually a situation of political alternativelessness in those constituencies.

2 The CEC received 23 complaints from 27 candidates, 4 citizens and 1 authorized representative in this stage of parliamentary elections. Of these complaints, 4 were granted, 2 were partially granted, and 17 were rejected as unfounded.

The courts have not satisfied 24 of the 25 filed election complaints (including 14 appeals and 11 cassation complaints) and one election complaint was not considered possible.

In campaigning stage, the cost of mass media was not available to most candidates willing to participate in paid campaigns.

Delays and restrictions on the registration of local observers were recorded.

The CEC registered three organizations for conducting exit polls. However, in public opinion, there are serious doubts about the objectivity of the exit polls conducted by these bodies.

IDI believes that the persons responsible for violation of electoral rights, especially the officials of state bodies and municipalities involved in such activities should be called to account and punished. Election commissions should create conditions for observers to observe the election process in normal circumstances on election day. On election day, the government should display the political will to prevent external interferences of local executive bodies and other structures in the processes of voting and vote counting.

II. INTRODUCTION

On February 9, 2020, early parliamentary elections will be held in Azerbaijan.

The Institute for Democratic Initiatives (IDI) provides legal assistance to the various parties involved in the election that has been commenced since December 5, 2019, as far as conditions permit, in addition to observing elections.

At this stage, IDI prepared a report by conducting monitoring on the pre-election environment, the election preparation process, the nomination and registration process, the activities of the election administration, preparation for the campaign, the status of complaints and appeals. It also provided recommendations in the report for eliminating the factors that violated electoral rights. In general, the report is based on monitoring conducted by twelve-person long-term observers and information collected from various parties involved in the elections.

Prior to this report, the Pre-election Assessment Paper, the I Interim Report on the nomination and registration period, as well as the report on results of Media Monitoring for the first period were released.

More detailed information on IDI’s activities can be found on the organization’s official website.1

III.POLITICAL SITUATION

1 www.idi-aze.org 3 The political situation shown in IDI‘s previous reports has not changed, and these problems have not been resolved.

On January 30, 2020, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) announced its decision on 8 complaints. Most of the alleged violations for those decisions were recognized and it was decided for the government to pay a total of € 121,889 to the applicants whose rights were violated. According to the decisions, the court found violations of torture, freedom and inviolability, the right to a fair trial, the right to privacy, freedom of association, as defined in the European Convention on Human Rights.

On February 6, 2020, the ECHR decided on four more cases against Azerbaijan and removed them from the list of cases to be considered. One of these cases (the case of Alakbar Ismayilov) was dismissed from the list of cases due to the failure to respond to communications and the other (the case of Elman Damirov) due to his death and no successor left behind. In two other cases (the case of Rashad Ramazanov2 and the case of Orkhan Aliyev3), the government acknowledged the violation and stated that it was ready to pay compensation. The Azerbaijani government will pay € 8,600 to the parties.

In general, the ECHR has released statistics for 2019 during this period. During the year, decisions on 56 complaints that were filed against Azerbaijan were made.4

Human Rights Watch, which is also one of the international organizations, has also released its 2020 report.5 In the section on Azerbaijan of the report, the situation in the country related to human rights is severely criticized.

During the winter session of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) on January 30, 2020, the issue of political prisoners in Azerbaijan was discussed. According to the report of PACE Speaker Torhildur Sunna Evars-Dottir, Resolution 2322 on political prisoners was adopted.6 The resolution recommended the release of persons considered to be political prisoners under the Council of Europe criteria, the regular fair and impartial review of cases of persons who alleged to be politically motivated by the court, substantiated intervention in the judicial system, including court, prosecutor's office, police system, and administrative arrests to prevent politically motivated arrests, and implementation of the decisions of the European Court without delay.

During this period, the Facebook pages of the Musavat Party, as well as the “Basta” Web portal, which was considered close to that party, were seized. The activity of party pages and web portal has not yet been restored.

IDI recorded the following information on the persecution of political activists during the reporting period:

• On January 24, 2020, it was reported that Alizamin (Zamin) Salayev, a member of the PFPA, was tortured. According to the information, A.Salayev was arrested in Baku and tortured at the 8th police station for protesting against the actions of an employee of the Salyan police department, who was

2 https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{“fulltext":["rashad%20ramazanov"],"itemid":["001-201210"]}

3 https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{“fulltext":["Orkhan%20aliyev"],"itemid":["001-201209"]}

4 https://www.realtv.az/news/az/37550/avropa-mehkemesi-azerbaycanla-bagli-statistikani-achiqlayib

5 https://www.hrw.org/az/world-report/2020/country-chapters/337344

6 http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=28584&lang=en 4 allegedly involved in violence against a young woman. The letter, which contains the facts, was published in the media.7

• On January 27, 2020, a member of the National Council of Democratic Forces launched a campaign of psychological pressure against Gultekin Hajibeyli. Her phone numbers were distributed as “sex service” contact numbers on online resources. The person herself has made it public.8

IV. ELECTION ADMINISTRATION

During the reporting period, the Central Election Commission (CEC) continued its preparations for the forthcoming elections. It also conducted pieces of training for lower-level election commissions, regional seminars and conferences dedicated to the resolution of election disputes in court within the framework of a joint project with the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal, and seminars for IT specialists of Constituency Election Commissions.

The CEC has started printing election bulletins since 27 January. By the decision of the Commission, 5,387,600 election bulletins were printed, provided that the number of ballots did not exceed 3% of the total number of voters. Since February 2, election bulletins have been distributed to the ConECs. Mass media and observers were invited to start the event of printing and distribution of election bulletins. The bulletins were published in the press of the National Assembly under the supervision of three CEC members. The deadline for the filing of appeals and cassation complaints regarding candidate registration was not taken into account during the printing of bulletins.

On 5 February, the CEC decided to install webcams at 1,000 (a thousand) precincts in 119 constituencies, and a list of those precincts was posted on its official website.9

V. VOTER REGISTRATION

The update of voter lists was finished on January 15 with 5,238,000 people in 125 constituencies. Thus, after the number of voters (5,212,902) approved on May 29, 2019, 25,098 voters were added to the list.

However, this figure is drastically different from the figure released by the State Statistics Committee. According to the data given to the ODIHR EOM by the State Statistical Committee, as of December 2019, the number of citizens who have reached the age of voting was shown as 7,325,000. The Committee notes that this includes Azerbaijani citizens living abroad, foreign nationals living in the country, as well as the Nagorno-Karabakh population, according to the 1989 Soviet Union census.10 However, the grounds presented do not have the power to expound the difference of incompatibility and it cannot be considered

7 https://www.azadliq.org/a/i%CC%87%C5%9Fg%C9%99nc%C9%99-%C5%9Fikay%C9%99tl%C9%99ri-v%C9%99-ona- veril%C9%99n-cavablar/30395103.html

8 http://hurriyyet.info/siyaset/7204-gultekin-hacibeyliye-qarshi-exlaqsiz-kampaniya-bitmir.html#.Xjz9TGhKhPY

9 http://www.msk.gov.az/az/newsmsk/1142/

10 https://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/azerbaijan/445057?download=true 5 reasonable. In this regard, IDI’s 2015 research named “Voter Registry Audit” explains in more detail the nature of the problem.11

The Precinct Election Commission should place voter lists on the information boards, which voters can see well and which are easy to access, out of the voting room for familiarization of voters and additional clarifications at least 35 days before the voting day. According to IDI observations, voter lists were not placed at precincts in some election constituencies or it is impossible to see those lists due to the areas they were placed. Observers are not able to receive information on the voter list. Moreover, some polling stations were closed during working hours. Here are some examples:

• In the Sumgayit First Constituency No.41, on January 27, 2020, voters lists were not placed at Precincts No.1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8

• On January 18, at 11:24, it was observed that Precinct No.25 of Nasimi-Sabail Constituency No.23 was closed.

• On January 26, it was observed that voter lists were dispersedly on the table in Precinct No.14 of the Yasamal Third Constituency No.17.

• On February 2, Precincts No.2, 6, 9, 17 of Surakhani Third Constituency No.32 were closed at noon.

• No information board was observed in front of Precinct No.9 of Lankaran-Astara Constituency No. 76 and information boards at Precincts No.2, 17, 30, 32, 45 cannot be seen because the door to the yard is closed when there is no lesson. At the same time, places considered for observers on election day are not suitable in Precincts No.1, 2, 15, 21, 25, 27 of the same constituency. Precincts No.18, 17, 14, 23, 30, 9, 6, 16, 29 were closed at noon.

VI. CANDIDATE REGISTRATION

The CEC considered complaints related to the decisions of the ConECs on registration during this reporting period and made relevant decisions. A detailed report can be found in the Appeals and Complaints section.

According to the official data of the CEC, 313 people withdrew their nominations within a very short period of time until February 1, after January 17, when the registration of the candidacy ends.12

In the 2015 elections, the number of withdrawals was 479 during this period, and in the 2010 elections, it was only 41.

Observations show that mass and immediate withdrawal of candidates creates doubt that the process will be carried out by instruction. This conclusion has also been come by the fact that most candidates, who withdrew, work in state-financed offices and enterprises.

As a result of the IDI monitoring, it was identified that the number of candidates who continue to participate in the election is 1,305. 77.5 percent (1,012 people) of them are neutral. The number of candidates nominated by his/her own initiative is 1,070 (82%). 238 nominees from 18 political parties continue to stand for election. Most of them are YAP (New Azerbaijan Party) (122), followed by Musavat

11 https://idi-aze.org/az/seici-qeydiyyatnn-auditi-pdf/

12 https://apa.az/az/daxili_siyaset/Deputatliga-namizdliyini-geri-goturnlrin-sayi-313-nfr-catib-570005 6 (25) and Umid (Party of Hope) (19). 294 of the candidates stated that they are members of the party and thus members of 25 parties continue to participate in the elections.

While their candidacy appears to be officially independent, candidates from the REAL Republican Union (30) and the Movement Election Bloc (16) continue to process as two unofficial opposition election blocs.

More details on the nomination and party affiliation are described in Annex 1.

VII. PRE-ELECTION CAMPAIGN

A. LEGAL FRAMEWORK

According to Article 75.2 of the Election Code, the pre-election campaign begins 23 days before the voting day and ends 24 hours before the start of voting.

According to Article 74.2 of the Election Code, the pre-election campaign can be carried out in the following ways:

• By mass media;

• Through holding mass events (gatherings and meetings with citizens, public discussions, conversations, etc.);

• Through the issuance and distribution of printed, audiovisual and other campaign materials;

• In other ways not prohibited by law

The pre-election campaign is being implemented through television and radio, as well as periodicals. According to Article 80.1 of the Election Code, political parties and a bloc of political parties, whose candidates are registered in more than 60 constituencies, can receive free airtime on Public television and radio.

Article 86 of the Election Code states that state authorities and municipalities should assist candidates and political parties in organizing meetings, open discussions, and allocating places during the campaign.

B. ENVIRONMENT

IDI observations show that the reduction of the election period has created serious obstacles to the pre- election campaign, using the legal means available. The lack of favorable conditions for campaigning has led to a dysfunctional campaign period. Furthermore, the National Council, an important part of the opposition, does not participate in the elections and has not held any mass action during this period. The activities of other leading opposition parties, the Musavat Party, the Real Party, and others, have focused more on electoral constituencies and have not carried out any large-scale public events. As a result, the opportunity to conduct a pre-election campaign in a transparent, fair, and equitable environment was lost for political parties that oppose each other.

7 As a result of early parliamentary elections, lack of political environment, and the problems with the nomination and registration of political party candidates who decided to participate in the elections, except for the NAP, others were not eligible to receive free airtime during the campaign period. The NAP refused the right it obtained, saying it would not conduct a unilateral campaign. Although the same happened during the 2010 parliamentary elections, each candidate registered was given a 4-minute free airtime on Public Television with the decision of the CEC. In these elections, as in 2015, no such decision was made, and as a result, no free campaigning was provided.

The cost of mass media was also not available to most candidates willing to participate in paid campaigns, as mentioned in the previous report. IDI notes with regret that the cost of paid airtime on Public Television was shown as the maximum of the advertising price. This was described in more detail in the I Interim Report.13

The CEC has designated a list of only 272 places in each constituency, with one open and one closed for each constituency, during the pre-election campaign for candidates to meet with voters and to hold meetings. However, in the 2010 parliamentary elections, there were 4,930 places in total, with 2,676 open and 2,254 closed. IDI's long-term observers have been monitoring these places since January 17. Based on the observations, it became clear that most of the locations and distances were not suitable for holding meetings with voters.

Unlike the previous elections, the candidates widely used the potential of the new media in these elections. The campaign of candidates was carried out on social networks such as Facebook, Youtube, and Twiter. Another reason for applying for these propaganda methods is the lack of financial access to paid campaign opportunities for candidates.

Candidates also carried out their campaigns in web portals and news agencies.

C. IDI'S PRE-ELECTION CAMPAIGN OBSERVATIONS

Observers working with IDI recorded various violations during the pre-election campaign during long-term observation of 78 constituencies in the country. Observations also indicate that no election campaign was conducted by opposition or real independent candidate in 40 constituencies. This is actually a situation of political alternativelessness in those constituencies.

More detailed information is described in Annex 2.

IDI grouped the violations that they observed as follows:

a) Abuse of administrative and financial resources

The data on such violations shows that, as in recent elections, candidates used a variety of illegal means to gain voter approval in this election too. Thus, in some constituencies, the candidates provided free services to the voters and carried out renovation and repair work in their neighborhoods and on local roads. All

13 http://idi-aze.org/az/idi-nin-nvbedenkenar-parlament-sekileri-ile-bal-araliq-hesabati/ 8 these are the violation of provisions of Article 74 of the Election Code, Article 39 and 42-1 of the Code of Administrative Offenses.

• According to data from Khazar-Pirallahi Constituency No.13, during the NAP candidate Rauf Aliyev’s meetings at schools No.26, 134 in Buzovna and at school No.181 in Mardakan on March 25, 2020, teachers were forced to participate in the meetings. Similar cases have occurred during the NAP candidate Vagif Hamzayev’s meeting at the Ganja Heydar Aliyev Center in the Nizami Second (Ganja) Constituency No.38 on January 27, 2020, during the NAP candidate Tahir Mirkishili’s meeting in the Sumgayit Second Constituency No.42 on January 24, 2020, as well as during independent candidate Anatoly Rafailov’s meetings in the villages of Konakkend and Khaltan in the Guba-Gusar Constituency No.53 on January 23, 2020.

• In the Khazar Constituency No.14, one of Soltan Mammadov’s authorized representatives, Zakir Bashirov, used his powers to force the hospital staff to participate in Soltan Mammadov’s election campaign since he was the head doctor at the Baku City Hospital No.29. One of the representatives of the current MP, Ulvi Guliyev, who is a candidate from Yasamal First Constituency No.15, is the head doctor at the Republican Hospital. He urges hospital staff to attend Ulvi Guliyev’s meetings.

• Elnur Allahverdiyev, the NAP candidate from the Yasamal Third Constituency No.17, on January 27, 2020, it was observed that voters were illegally provided with financial assistance and gifts in Gadirli Street.

• In the Nizami Second Constituency No.25, the NAP candidate S.Valiyeva has promised to repair the house of a voter whose house is not repaired and asked the homeowner to campaign for her in the building. In the Oguz-Gabala Constituency No.117, the NAP candidate Agiya Nakhchivanli took a payment of AZN 600 for one student upon herself and provided financial assistance to poor families as AZN 200. The NAP candidate Huseynbala Miralamov from Khatai First Constituency No.33 and Aydin Mirzazadeh from Mingachevir Constituency No.47 carried out repair works in the relevant district. Rashad Mahmudov, candidate of the NAP from the Astara Constituency No.77, has a lawn cover for playground prepared on the area.

• At school No.311, located in the territory of Sabunchu Second Constituency No.27, the information has been released that parents, who are registered in the district, were sent a notification through the students in connection with coming to the election.

• During the meeting of candidate of the NAP in Sumgayit Third Constituency No.43, Emin Hajiyev, held in the 17th microdistrict on January 28, mass attendance of budget workers in the meeting took place. The workers of Housing Maintenance Area (HMA) call residents' homes and ask them to vote for the NAP candidate on election day. The head of the territorial administration department of the Oguz Executive Power, Sayaf Abbasov, head of the Oguz district agriculture department, Azad Aliyev, and the imam of the Juma Mosque, Shovket Jalilov, participated in the meetings of the NAP candidate from the Oguz-Gabala Constituency No.117, Agiya Nakhchivanli.

• In the Nasimi First Constituency No.21, teachers were forced to attend the meetings of the NAP candidate Malahat Ibrahimgizi on January 28, 2020, in the yard of schools No.159, 54, 211.

• On January 24, Hadi Radjabli, candidate of the NAP from the Lankaran Rural Constituency No.74, lessons were stopped at 10:00 am in the village schools along the Lankaran-Lerik road and teachers, students, and some parents who were also in the school area were taken with the buses for his meeting in the village of Girden. At the same time, on February 5, in the Salyan-Neftchala

9 Constituency No.60, lessons were stopped and teachers were taken for the meeting of candidate of the AVP, Fazail Agamali, in the villages of Yolustu and Kerimbeyli.

• In the Nizami Second Constituency No.25, SOCAR paved some roads and renovated ceremony homes, which is accepted as a favor for the NAP candidate Saadat Guliyeva.

• In the Sabunchu Third Constituency No.28, candidate Eldar Guliyev has money distributed under the leading of the village executive office in Bilgah. AZN 20 were given for a vote in one precinct, and AZN 40 for votes in two precincts, and voters were given a jacket in Mashtaga. Doctors and teachers bring their additional clothes to their workplaces. Preparations are being made for the election day to come to precincts every time with one clothes and vote with ID cards collected beforehand.

• Nigar Arpadarai, an independent candidate from Nasimi-Sabail Constituency No.28, held a meeting at school No.6 on January 21 and teachers also participated in the meeting and at the same time, no details were given on the candidate's campaign about the circulation, ordering, or printing.

• A voice recording is spread that MP Faraj Guliyev, candidate of the MDHP from the Surakhani Second Constituency No.31, offered Mehman Huseynov, member of the Movement Election Bloc, AZN 15,000 to withdraw his candidacy in his favor.

• Deputy Head of Surakhani Executive Power Etibar Yolchuyev (head of the election office) summoned school teachers and staff unregistered in that area for the meeting of the NAP candidate from Surakhani Constituency No.32, Afet Hasanova.

• In the Sumgayit Constituency No.41, voters participated in the meetings of the NAP candidate Hijran Huseynova at the 47th neighborhood on February 2, 2020, and in the 17th microdistrict on January 31 were teachers and Housing Maintenance Area staff. During a meeting of candidate of the Musavat Party, Konul Aliyeva, in the same constituency on January 25, 2020, representatives of the Housing Maintenance Area tricked her voters and took them to a meeting of the NAP candidate Hijran Huseynova.

• In the Shabran-Siyazan Constituency No.54, the NAP candidate Sadig Gurbanov was engaged in road repair in the area.

• The head of Goychay District Executive Power directly participated in the campaign of the candidate from the Goychay Constituency No.88, Sabir Hajiyev.

• Nazim Aghayev, the head of Khachmaz District Culture Department, and Sayyaf Taghiyev, the head doctor of Khachmaz District Central Hospital, urged their employees to vote for the NAP candidate from the Khachmaz City Constituency No.55, Eldaniz Salimova.

• Asphalting in the central bazaar of Neftchala district and current repairs to the Shorsulu Khazarkand road were made in the election period. The VHP chairman Sabir Rustamkhanli, who is a candidate from Neftchala Constituency No.61, was observed to campaign, “I do the work done from the state budget.”

• In the Bilasuvar Constituency No.66, executive officials would gather the village elders, religious leaders, and families of martyrs and take to the meeting during the meetings of the independent candidate Bahruz Maharramov.

10 • ADP candidate from Jalilabad-Masalli-Bilasuvar Constituency No.69, Dashkin Guliyev, was informed on January 25, 2020, that the results would be decided in favor of VHP candidate Fazail Ibrahimli in the precinct located in Hajiabad village. In addition, the chairman of the PEC No.9 of Jalilabad Constituency No.68, Vagif Bunyadov, encouraged citizens to vote for Elman Nasirov.

• RFE / RL reports that some of the voters attended the meeting of the NAP candidate from the Astara Constituency No.77, Rashad Mahmudov, were workers of the Astara District Executive Power and were the head of the library, education department, and various departments. Allahveren Mahmudov, the first deputy head of the Astara District Executive Power, confirmed the presence of their workers among the representatives of the NAP candidate.

• Jalil Bakhshiyev, who is the deputy from the Lerik Constituency No.78 and representative of current candidate Igbal Mammadov the first deputy head of the NAP Lerik District Organization, and recently the first deputy head of the Lerik District Executive Power, warned people working in state-owned enterprises to vote for Igbal Mammadov. He pressured teachers to attend an independent candidate's meeting in Mondigah village.

• On January 27, a 3-time deputy from the Zardab-Ucar Constituency No.92 and the current candidate, Jale Aliyeva, involved several village executive representatives and school principals to the campaign at the Alvand village club in Zardab district and shared the images/videos on her Facebook page.

• The head of Barda City Executive Power, Vidadi Isayev, pressured teachers and school principals to attend Zahid Oruj’s meetings and campaigned for him. Barda akhund Ramazan Efendi read a sermon Zahid Oruj’s honor, following Vidadi Isayev’s instructions.

• According to information released on January 24, 2020, the NAP candidate Fatma Yildirim has the asphalt road in the village made in the Barda district.

• In the Aghstafa Constituency No.108, candidate of the “REAL Republicans’ Union”, Vugar Mustafayev, said that he was offered money from the ConEC on January 25, 2020, to withdraw his candidacy. He said this was repeated many times.

• In the Sheki City Constituency No.113, on January 31, 2020, people from the constituency No.115 were brought to the NAP candidate Vugar Iskandarov’s meeting with voters. Also, teachers were forced to attend Vugar Iskandarov’s meeting on January 24, 2020.

• On January 18, 2020, the official Facebook page of Azerbaijan University of Languages shared the posters and images/videos from campaigning of Tamam Jafarova and Sarraf Huseynov, candidates from the Shamakhi Constituency No.85 and the Nasimi Constituency No.22 respectively, who worked at that educational institution at the same time, urged teachers, students, and alumni to vote for them.

b) Lack of equal opportunities for candidates

According to the observations, some election constituencies did not provide equal conditions for candidates. This is also a violation of the requirements of the Election Code for creating equal conditions for candidates.

• Javid Gambarov, a candidate of “REAL Republicans’ Union” from the Khazar Constituency No.14, agreed to hold a meeting at the House of Culture located on Bine on January 25. Despite the fact

11 that independent candidate Abid Gafarov had a meeting with voters on the same day in this place, on January 26, the ConEC told Javid Gambarov that they would not allow a meeting to be held. From the Sumgayit Constituency No.41, the NAP candidate Hijran Huseynova and independent candidate Tahir Aliyev were able to hold a meeting in the ceremony homes very easily, however, the candidate of the “REAL Republicans’ Union”, Vasif Ismail, is not allowed to meet there. As of February 4, 2020, the ConEC No.41 told him that it was only allowed to campaign in the 7th microdistrict.

• From the Narimanov-Nizami Constituency No.18, candidate of the “REAL Republicans’ Union”, Vugar Hasanov applied to hold a meeting with voters on January 25, 2020, at the Institute of “Chemistry of Additives” which was allocated for all candidates. Although he received a positive response from the ConEC, they prevented the candidate from meeting the same day. They told that they were not informed about it.

• From the Nizami First Constituency No.24, candidate of the “REAL Republicans’ Union”, Aykhan Mehdizadeh, on January 19, agreed with the owner of the pharmacy in Keshla and attached the campaign material to the wall. However, after some time, the ConEC asked to remove the material.

• Irada Javadova, an independent candidate from the Nizami Second Constituency No.25, was warned by the ConEC that the payment for printing campaign materials can only be made through a bank transfer, cash is not allowed.

• In Sumgayit Constituency No.41, posters of the NAP candidate Hijran Huseynova were attached in school windows at school No.39, while others were not allowed to do so.

• Alipanah Rzali, candidate of the Musavat Party from the Jalilabad-Masalli-Bilasuvar Constituency No.69, was not allowed to attach the campaign materials by executive officials in Soyuqbulag village of Jalilabad. Although his meeting was scheduled to be held at the Heydar Aliyev Park in Goytapa village on February 5, 2020, the executive representative of Goytepe village, Sabir Huseynov, did not allow the meeting.

• The poster of the NAP candidate Ziyafat Askerov was found at Precinct No.34 in Lankaran-Astara Constituency No.76. The chairman of the precinct said that if the rain spoiled the campaign billboard material, they would hang it instead.

• Vugar Aliyev, an independent candidate from the Tartar Constituency No.95, appealed to the ConEC on February 3 with a petition to ask for being provided with an opportunity to meet with voters at the Tartar Culture House, which was allocated for candidates, on February 6, at 4 pm. However, neither the ConEC accepted the application nor submitted an official document of refusal.

c) Pressures during the pre-election campaign

During the pre-election campaign period, there were cases of pressure on voters, especially candidates. These cases were mainly against voters during the candidates' meetings, as well as related to attaching the campaign materials of the candidates. This is a violation of the requirements of Article 55 of the Election Code.

• Rufat Rahimov, candidate of the “REAL Republicans’ Union” in the Binagadi First Constituency No.8, was asked to withdraw his candidacy on January 22, 2020, by the director in his workplace. According to him, the pressure started from the signature period, stopped for a while but continued after some time again.

12 • There was a police interference to the meeting with voters of the candidate for deputy from Narimanov-Nizami Constituency No.18, Oktay Gasimov. This was reported on January 24 in the media.

• Emin Masimli, candidate of the “REAL Republicans’ Union” from the Sabunchu Constituency No. 27, said that on February 3, 2020, he, his assistants, and team members were subjected to violence by the chairman of the ConEC and he did not want to register about 40 observers.

• In the Sabunchu Third Constituency No.28, Naila Mammadova, the head of secondary school No. 187 and the chairman of the PEC, by calling in parents to the school, threatened those who do not give their ID or send its copy that their children would be pressured at school and they would have problems with their attestation. Everyone was informed to come to the election shortly after 5 pm.

• The chairman of the NAP Surakhani organization called in the mother of Farid Eyvazov, the candidate of the Movement Election Bloc from Surakhani First Constituency No.30, to the secondary school No.146 where she works as a teacher and demanded her son’s withdrawal of his candidacy.

• Candidate for deputy from Khatai Constituency No.34, Samad Rahimli, was summoned to the Ministry of Internal Affairs on January 18, 2020, one day after the launch of the campaign. The candidate told the media that he was criticized by the ministry for criticizing police in his interviews. During the time he was at the Ministry, the candidate was prohibited from using his mobile phone.

• Candidate for deputy from Shirvan Constituency No.46, member of Musavat Party Alikram Khurshidov was summoned to the Shirvan city police department on February 5, 2020. The candidate posted about this on his Facebook page.

• Authorized representative and observer of Gurbanali Yusifov, candidate of the Movement Election Block from Mingachevir Constituency No.47, were taken to the police while recording the video of people’s being brought en masse to Aydin Mirzazade’s meeting in Drama Theater on February 6, 2020, and were released after receiving an explanation.

• On February 5, an independent candidate from the Guba-Gusar Constituency No.53, Javid Gara, was summoned to the police.

• One of the members participating in the election campaign of an independent candidate from Zardab-Ujar Constituency No.92, Adem Mammadov, was dismissed from the job.

• A person whose name is Kamil and his wife, who works as a maid in Karachala village secondary school, were harassed by the school principal since they supported Kamil Musavi, a candidate from Salyan-Neftchala Constituency No.60 and he threatened to dismiss the wife from the job and have the husband arrested.

• Candidate from Jalilabad-Masalli-Bilasuvar Constituency No.69, while Alipanah Rzali was at the meeting in the village of Khirmandali, the police prevented people from attending the meeting.

• When Fikret Jafarli, an independent candidate from the Surakhani Third Constituency No.32, held a meeting on February 2, 2020, the streets leading to that building were intercepted by post-patrol and executive officers and citizens were pressured not to attend the meeting.

13 • Since independent candidate from Lankaran Constituency No.73, member of the Musavat Party Yadigar Sadigli planned a meeting with voters in the tea house, the owner of the facility was pressured and the tea house was closed. About 30 police intervened in the meeting outdoors. He was asked to come to the police station the next day at 11:00.

• While attempting to campaign in a car with his loudspeaker on February 5 in Khanbulan village of Astara district, Khalid Bagirov, candidate from the Lankaran-Astara Constituency No.76, was prevented by police and was not allowed to campaign and later police put pressure on the person who helped the candidate in his car and sent him away. On February 6, K.Bagirov was summoned to the Lankaran police station. On February 3, 2020, Feyaz Asadov, who complained about the person who organized the meeting with the citizen of the NAP candidate Ziyafat Askerov, was arrested for 10 days.

• An executive representative in Agjabadi ordered to remove posters of Anar Isayev, candidate of the Umid Party from the Aghjabadi-Fuzuli Constituency No.83, from the facilities. The ConEC asked Anar Isayev for a meeting route with voters and sent executive representatives during the meeting.

• From the Goychay Constituency No.88, candidate of the “REAL Republicans’ Union”, Famil Sadigov, was summoned to the Goychay District Police Office on January 15, 2020, for a meeting with the observers at the tea house called “Oskar”.

• Police intervened in the meeting with voters of Arastun Bakhshaliyev, candidate of the “REAL Republicans’ Union” from Barda City Constituency No.93, on January 22, 2020, in the Kirmizisamukh village of Barda. At the same time, on January 21, 2020, head of Barda Executive Power, Vidadi Isayev, pressured the candidate's parents for their son’s withdrawal.

• The fruit garden of Lanbaran village resident Mahammad Ibrahimov, who was participated in the campaign of Dadash Ahmadli, candidate of the Musavat Party from Barda Rural Constituency No. 94, was burned by the executive. On February 5, he was called to the district police station.

• On February 3, while Vugar Aliyev, an independent candidate from Tartar Constituency No.95, was holding a meeting with voters in Yukhari Gapanly village of Tartar district, mayor of the village intervened in the meeting, prevented voters from coming to the meeting.

• In the Sheki City Constituency No.113, the “REAL Republicans’ Union” candidate Razim Rzayev’s wife’s brother was pressured due to participation in the candidate's campaign on February 4, 2020. The candidate was forced to delete the video from his Facebook page because of the presence of that person.

• During his meeting with voters of Mehdi Guliyev, candidate of the “REAL Republicans’ Union” from the Gabala Constituency No.116, in New Dizakhli village on January 20, 2020, Khasiev Tabriz, who replaced the executive representative, told them to leave the village immediately. It was said that the force would be used if they did not leave the village.

d) Destruction of campaign materials

Observers cooperating with IDI have observed the destruction of campaign materials related to the candidates during the campaign on information boards, on the roadsides, on privately owned facilities, and on other places.

14 • On January 31, 2020, posters of Rufat Rahimov, candidate of the “REAL Republicans’ Union”, and Arzu Samedbeyli, candidate of the Musavat Party, were destroyed in Binagadi Constituency No.8.

• Posters of Samir Mammadov, candidate of the “REAL Republicans’ Union” from the Garadag Constituency No.11, were destroyed in Precincts No.32 and 12 on February 2, 2020.

• Poster of Natiq Jafarli, candidate of the “REAL Republicans’ Union” from the Yasamal Constituency No.12, was destroyed at the secondary school No.286 on January 24, 2020, and on January 29, independent candidate Karim Kerimli’s poster was destroyed in Precinct No.2. On February 3, 2020, 8 of Natiq Jafarli's posters on 14 facilities in the territory of Lokbatan were removed from the facilities at the instruction of the district executive.

• Poster of Farhad Mehdiyev, candidate of the “REAL Republicans’ Union” from the Nasimi First Constituency No.21, attached by agreement with the owner on the property on Salimzade Street on January 29, 2020, was cut off without the permission of the owner.

• Posters of Elchin Hagverdiyev, candidate of the “REAL Republicans’ Union” from the Nasimi Second Constituency No.22, were cut off at the Precincts No.6, 13, 14, 25 on February 1, 2020.

• Posters of Aykhan Mehdizadeh, candidate of the “REAL Republicans’ Union” from the Nizami First Constituency No.24, were destroyed at the Precinct No.19 on February 1, 2020.

• Posters of Faraj Karimli, candidate of the Musavat Party from the Sabail Constituency No.29, were cut off at the Precincts No.4, 8, 10, 11, 14 on January 27, 2020.

• Poster of Mahmud Mahmudov, candidate of the “REAL Republicans’ Union” from the Surakhani First Constituency No.30, was removed from the board in Precincts No.19 and 21 on January 20, 2020.

• Posters of Toghrul Iskenderli, candidate of the “REAL Republicans’ Union” from the Kapaz (Ganja) Constituency No.40, were torn in Precincts No.7, 20, 21 on February 3, 2020.

• Posters of Vasif Ismayil, candidate of the “REAL Republicans’ Union” from the Sumgayit Constituency No.41, were spoiled on January 23, 2020, in Precincts No.7 and 8. Posters attached to the facilities in the 48th neighborhood and the 17th microdistrict were torn down. Over the past 10 days, all posters have been cut off in the area from the Olympic stadium to the 21st neighborhood. The posters of the Musavat Party's candidate Konul Ali were destroyed on January 27.

• Posters of Elshad Israfil, a candidate from Sumgayit Second Constituency No.42, in front of the Narimanov Culture House and School No.16 were cut off on January 27.

• Poster of Rustam Hidayetzade, candidate of the “REAL Republicans’ Union” from the Shabran- Siyazan Constituency No.54, was cut off in the village Agbash on January 28 and Precinct No.57 on February 2.

• Poster of Arastun Bakhshaliyev, candidate of the “REAL Republicans’ Union” from the Barda City Constituency No.93, was destroyed by the field officer of Kirmizisamukh village at Precinct No.26 on January 30.

• Posters of Tamilla Gulami, a candidate from the Tartar Constituency No.95, attached at the school No.5 and through the doors and shops of the villagers, were removed by the executive representatives at night.

15 • Posters of Zohrab Aliyev, candidate of the “REAL Republicans’ Union” from the Barda Rural Constituency No.94, were damaged at Precinct No.41 on January 26, and at Precincts No.21 and 22 on January 23. Although Zohrab Aliyev made an agreement with markets located in the territory of constituency No.94 to get permission to hang posters, after the posters were attached, the chairman of the ConEC demanded the posters be removed on January 19.

• Posters of Vugar Mustafayev, candidate of the “REAL Republicans’ Union” from the Aghstafa Constituency No.108, were damaged at Precinct No.10 on January 28, and posters, attached on facilities in Aghstafa city and Dagkesemen village, were cut off on February 4.

• Poster of Mete Türksoy, candidate of the “REAL Republicans’ Union” from the Sheki Rural First Constituency No.114, attached on January 21 with the consent of the owner of the facility in the village of Bash Goynuk, was cut off on January 23 by the executive officer Rza Jalalov’s instruction.

e) Barriers to hold meetings in closed places

According to Article 86.6 of the Election Code, registered candidates may conduct meetings with voters who are in military service when such meetings are arranged by the commanders of those military units in cooperation with the Constituency Election Commission, only if all registered candidates or their representatives are invited or informed of this meeting at least three days in advance. All candidates should be provided with equal conditions for conducting such meetings, and opportunities shall be ensured for observers to observe such meetings.

• Karim Karimli, an independent candidate from the Karadag-Binagadi-Yasamal Constituency No.12, appealed to the ConEC for a meeting in the prison and military units. The chairman of ConEC said that precincts would be set up there 5 days before election day and then it would be possible to hold a meeting. It was said that he should also invite other candidates for the meeting and all the candidates should hold meeting together. The chairman of the ConEC also said that for meetings in prisons, it is necessary to contact the Ministry of Justice for meetings in prison and the Ministry of Defense for meetings in military units. So the opportunity to meet was not created.

• Yadigar Sadigli, an independent candidate from the Lankaran Constituency No.73, appealed to the ConEC for a meeting in a military unit located in the territory. However, the meeting did not receive a positive response from the ConEC under the pretext that it should be agreed with the commander of the military unit.

• On January 3, Vugar Aliyev, an independent candidate from the Tartar Constituency No.95, appealed to the ConEC to enter the closed facility. However, the ConEC did not organize the meeting with voters.

VIII. MEDIA

There has been no positive change in the assessment of the media environment in the previous reports. Again, the independent media environment is limited, especially, the electronic media is being completely controlled by the government.

The situation faced by the independent media is particularly concerning when considering the pre-election environment. IDI has monitored the performance of the media in the elections and the results for the first

16 period (December 11, 2019 – January 16, 2020) were released on January 23, 2020.14 In addition, monitoring results for the second period is also to be released on February 8, 2020.

IX. COMPLAINTS AND APPEALS

According to Article 112 of the Election Code, complaints and appeals can be filed by voters, candidates, political parties and blocs and their representatives, observers and election commissions. The actions and decisions of election commissions violating electoral rights can be examined by a higher-level election commission. As well as the decisions and actions of the CEC can be appealed to the Court of Appeal. The decision of the Appeal Court can, in turn, be appealed to the Supreme Court. Complaints or appeals must be filed within 3 days following the day when the violation occurred or the decision was made. The complaint shall be examined within 3 days if received 30 days prior to the voting day, within 2 days if there are less than 30 days prior to the voting day or immediately on the voting day or the day after the voting day.

The Election Code envisages the creation of a 9-member expert group in the CEC and a 3-member expert group in a ConEC for examining the disputes related to the election.

At the first stage of February 9, 2020, Parliamentary Elections, i.e. the process of nomination and registration of candidates, the majority of the complaints filed about the actions and inaction of constituency election commissions have not been investigated objectively. It should be noted that according to the information posted on the CEC official website, the CEC received 23 complaints from 27 candidates, 4 citizens and 1 authorized representative in this stage of parliamentary elections. Of these complaints, 4 were granted, 2 were partially granted, and 17 were rejected as unfounded. One candidate’s two complaints were rejected. The rejected complaints have not been investigated comprehensively. While examining the complaints, members of the Expert Group often based themselves on the decision of the Constituency Election Commission. During the investigation, the CEC, like ConECs, violated the principle of transparency and investigation procedures.

Statistical summary on courts' consideration of appeals (cassation complaints)

It is possible to summarize the statistics of cases considered by the Courts of Appeal and the Supreme Court for the reporting period (January 17, 2020 – February 7, 2020) as follows:15

• During this period, the Baku Court of Appeal considered 14 cases on election complaints. Of the complaints, 12 were related to non-registration of candidates and 2 were related to campaign violations. In 13 cases considered by the Baku Court of Appeal, a decision was taken on merits and the claims were not satisfied. 1 case was considered inadmissible;

14 http://arqument.az/file/files/IDI_MEDIA%20MONITORING_Sentyabr%202015.pdf

15 Note: Information may be incomplete since the official statistic data of all Courts of Appeal are not fully accessible to the public. This summary contains observable data. 17 • During this period, the Shirvan Court of Appeal considered 1 case on election complaints. The complaint was related to the non-registration of the candidate. The case was considered on merits and the claim was not satisfied;

• During this period, 11 cases were considered by the Supreme Court on cassation appeals from decisions of the Courts of Appeal. The decisions of the Courts of Appeal were upheld on the non- satisfaction of claims by not providing cassation complaints on these cases.

As a result, the courts have not satisfied 24 of the 25 election complaints (including 14 appeals and 11 cassation complaints) filed over the merits of the case (excluding belonging decisions), and one election complaint was not considered possible.

In the practice of appeals regarding the non-registration of the candidates by the Courts of Appeal, the administrative and economic collegiums of the Courts of Appeal treated the cases in a formalistic manner and considered in a very short time.

The cases on complaints filed were also considered in a very short time in the Supreme Court. No investigation has been carried out on the merits of the complaint during this period.

IDI conducts monitoring on the consideration of complaints in the CEC and courts and will report the results of the monitoring to the public as a separate report after the election.

X. OBSERVERS

The Election Code provides for international and local observation. Local observers are registered as individuals or representatives of registered candidates, parties, or NGOs working in the field of elections. The CEC registers observers who wish to observe across the country, while the ConECs engage with the accreditation of observers who will monitor in the electoral constituency.

According to official data, 1,860 local observers have been registered by the CEC and 56,484 by ConECs across the country.16 Recall that 2,619 local observers were registered by the CEC and 63,000 by ConECs across the country at the 2015 parliamentary elections.

Since 2014, as a result of serious restrictions cerated for civil society related to the environment of right and activity, some NGOs, which have electoral experiences, have been deprived of observation and other election activities. Despite all the difficulties, few organizations that provide long-term and short-term observation and provide free legal aid continue to their activities.

A number of problems were encountered during the registration of observers:

• The CocEC rejected the appeal of Anar Isayev, candidate of the Umid Party from Aghjabadi-Fuzuli Constituency No.83, to appoint an observer and a lawyer.

• When Leman Ismayilova, an independent candidate from Oghuz-Gabala Constituency No.117, wished to appoint a consultant to the precincts, the chairman of the ConEC, Rasul Jafarov, said it was not legal and not be allowed.

16 https://apa.az/az/daxili_siyaset/Milli-Mclis-novbdnknar-seckilrl-laqdar-58-mindn-artiq-yerli-musahidci-qeydiyyatdan- kecib-569480 18 • On February 3, 2020, Turgut Gambar, candidate of the Movement Election Bloc, appointed an observer while presenting the documents to Nasimi Second Constituency No.22, two observers having a new generation ID card were required to submit a copy of their ID card along with their original ID and their right to be observers was not ensured.

• When in the Goychay Constituency No.88, candidate of the “REAL Republicans’ Union”, Famil Sadigov, applied to the ConEC for the registration of observers on February 3, 2020, they were not registered.

• When in the Sheki City Constituency No.113, candidate of the “REAL Republicans’ Union”, Razim Rzayev, applied to the ConEC on January 30, 2020, at 12:00, it refused to register his observers. The ConEC said that observers should meet with the chairman first.

Exit poll

During this period, the CEC registered three organizations for conducting exit polls. The information provided to the CEC by the bodies authorized to conduct the exit poll is not publicly available. Editor-in- chief of Argument.az website, Shamshad Aga, sent an information inquiry of the journalist to the CEC on February 4, 2020, for the disclosure of information provided by the exit-polling organizations. According to the requirement of Article 8 of the Law “On Mass Media”, an inquiry of a journalist should be responded no later than 24 hours. However, the CEC did not respond to the inquiry.

The aforementioned and the negative experience of previous elections have created a serious distrust of the objectivity of the exit polls conducted by these organizations.

International observer

According to the official figures of the CEC, from the 56 international organizations, of which names are not known to the general public, including the OSCE and PACE, 842 international observers, which will represent 55 countries, will observe the elections.

XI. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

IDI has come to the following conclusions with regard to the second stage of the Parliamentary Elections:

• In recent years, restrictive amendments and additions to the Election Code, lack of campaign environment and space, lack of free airtime on Public Television, and high financial conditions required for paid broadcasts have severely constrained the ability of candidates to campaign actively and competitively and have prevented the provision of political pluralism in the country;

• The CEC technically carried out its activities according to the law and during the legal period. However, it could not ensure equal conditions for candidates during the pre-election campaign;

• No progress has been made in the pre-election campaign to ensure political freedoms, in particular, freedom of speech and press and freedom of assembly, and those who are considered as political prisoners were not released;

19 • The pre-election campaign was accompanied by interferences by local executive bodies in the election process, pressure on opposition candidates and their campaigners, the use of administrative resources, and the violation of the principle of equality among candidates;

• Delays and restrictions on the registration of local observers were recorded.

IDI puts forward the following recommendations based on the results reached at the second stage of the Parliamentary Elections:

• The calls of the local and international organizations should be heeded, and the persons recognized as political prisoners and prisoners of conscience should be released in order to create an environment of mutual trust in the country;

• The persons responsible for violation of electoral rights, especially the officials of state bodies and municipalities involved in such activities should be called to account and punished;

• Election commissions should create conditions for observers to observe the election process in normal circumstances on election day;

• Election commissions should fulfill their responsibilities under the Election Code to avoid pressure on election participants.

• On election day, the government should display the political will to prevent external interferences of local executive bodies and other structures in the processes of voting and vote counting.

IDI Executive Board

Baku, February 7, 2020

Contact information:

Phone: (+99455) 234 76 76

Web: http://www.idi-aze.org/en

Email: [email protected]

20 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/DTI.IDI/

ANNEX 1

Statistics of the number of candidates based on the official CEC figures

No The party The number of Number of Number of Number of participating in the registered candidates with candidates candidates election candidates party affiliation nominated by nominated by their the party our own initiative or initiative group 1 YAP (NAP) 125 125 122 3 2 MUSAVAT 60 60 25 35

21 3 UMID (HOPE) 19 18 19 1 4 BAXCP 13 13 13 5 VAP 12 12 12 6 AMIP 10 10 9 1 7 AVP 8 8 8 8 ADP 8 8 7 1 9 MDHP 7 7 7 10 BQP 6 6 2 4 11 MMP 5 5 4 1 12 DIP 3 3 3 13 ASRP 3 3 1 2 14 BAP 2 2 1 1 15 AP 2 2 2 16 DADP 2 2 2 17 AXP 2 2 2 18 VP 1 1 1 19 AMP 1 1 1 20 ADMP 1 1 1 21 AKP 1 1 1 22 AP 1 1 1 23 VBP 1 1 1 24 ALDP 1 1 1 25 MVP 1 1 1 28 INDEPENDENTS 1,010 2 1,010 29 TOTAL 1,305 294 238 1,070

ANNEX 2

ConEC Constituencies with Violations political alternativelessness

22 alternativelessness Abuse of Lack of Pressures Destruction of administrativ equal during the campaign e and opportuniti pre- materials financial es for election resources candidates campaign 1 X X 2 X 3 X 4 X 5 X 6 X 7 X 8 X X 9 X X 10 X X 11 X 12 X X X 13 X X 14 X X X X 15 X 16 17 X X X 18 X X X 19 X X X 20 X 21 X X X 22 X X X 23 X X 24 X X X 25 X X X 26 X 27 X X X X

23 28 X X 29 X X X 30 X X X X 31 X X 32 X X X X 33 X X 34 X X 35 X X 36 37 X 38 X X X 39 X 40 X X 41 X X X X 42 X X 43 X 44 45 X X 46 X X 47 X X X 48 X 49 50 X 51 X 52 X 53 X 54 X X X 55 X X 56 X 57 X

24 58 X 59 X 60 X X X 61 X X 62 X 63 X X 64 X 65 X 66 X X X 67 X X 68 X X 69 X X X 70 X 71 X X 72 X X 73 X X X 74 X X 75 X X 76 X X X 77 X X X X 78 X 79 X X 80 X X 81 X 82 X 83 X 84 X X 85 X X X 86 X 87 X

25 88 X X X X 89 X 90 91 X X 92 X X 93 X X X X 94 X X X X 95 X X X 96 97 X 98 X 99 X 100 X 101 X 102 X X 103 X 104 X X 105 X 106 107 108 X X 109 X 110 X X 111 X 112 X X 113 X X X X 114 X X X 115 X 116 X X 117 X X X

26 118 X 119 X X 120 X 121 X 122 X 123 X 124 X X 125 X