The Poetics of the Middle in Kleist's “Michael Kohlhaas”
The Germanic Review, 85: 171–188, 2010 Copyright c Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 0016-8890 DOI: 10.1080/00168890.2010.504435 The Poetics of the Middle in Kleist’s “Michael Kohlhaas” Zachary Sng Heinrich von Kleist’s story, “Michael Kohlhaas,” has been often read as a demonstration of literature’s ability to cross over and intervene in a sphere other than its own. Kleist’s text is, however, replete with instances of thwarted crossing, impassable borders, and diversion into errancy. I argue that this tension points to Kleist’s profound ambivalence toward the logic of mediation and his doubts about whether language can function as a medium for the transportation and direction of force. I read the text as an exploration of a poetics of the middle and explore (via a brief discussion of Walter Benjamin’s “Zur Kritik der Gewalt”) the implications of such a reading for claims about the its performative efficacy. Keywords: Walter Benjamin, Heinrich von Kleist, law, mediation, performativity, vio- lence f the three elements of a well-constructed plot that Aristotle identified in the Poetics—a O beginning (archeˆ), a middle (meson),andanend(telos)—it is telling that our attention has so ostentatiously pooled around the first and the last, leaving the middle high and dry.1 The middle seems to suffer from a twofold problem: it is on the one hand less tangible than beginnings and endings, but on the other possessed of sufficient self-evidence to dodge critical notice. We find the middle indispensable, in other words, because something has to come between beginning and end, but our expectations of it are set pretty low.2 The secondary scholarship on Heinrich von Kleist’s story “Michael Kohlhaas” certainly bears out this characterization: an attention to the paired problem of beginning and ending, with a corollary neglect of the middle, has long been a hobby horse of its criticism.
[Show full text]