DOCSLIB.ORG

The Moroccan Crisis, 1905

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Moroccan Crisis, 1905 CONFLICT AND TENSION 1894-1918 REVISION BOOKLET 1 THE ORIGINS OF THE FIRST WORLD WAR What was Europe like before the war? Great Britain Russia - Wanted to maintain their imperial and naval - Had a large but ill-equipped army. supremacy. - Had a long-standing rivalry with Austria- - Did not want to get involved in European affairs – Hungary due to the high Slavic population in they were in ‘splendid isolation’. the A-H empire. - Was a strong trading nation, which, by 1914 had been - Fought and lost a war with Japan in 1905 and overtaken by Germany in chemical and steel therefore could not afford another one. production. France Serbia - Had a long- - Gained standing feud independence with Germany as from Turkey in they had been 1878. defeated in the - Wanted to join Franco-Prussian with Bosnia due War and had lost to the number of Alsace-Lorraine. Serbs living there. - Was not on good - Believed in pan- terms with Slavism. The Britain as they biggest obstacle had squabbled to this was the A- over land in H empire where Africa. Slavs lived under - Was worried Austro-Hungarian about the growth not Slavic rule. of the German military and industry. Germany Austria-Hungary - Unified in 1870. - Had a large empire made up of several - Bismarck wanted to maintain dominance through creating nationalities. It wanted to keep their alliances but wanted to weaken and isolate France. empire strong. - Wanted to increase the size of their empire and navy. - Wanted to take over the weakening - Was also worried about the growing size of the Russian Ottoman Empire (Turkey). army. - Was worried about Serbia. The Alliance System - The Triple Alliance 1882 - was arranged by Bismarck (the German Chancellor). Germany were aware that France would want revenge for its defeat in the Franco-Prussian War therefore the Triple Alliance was designed to a) alienate France and b) create a military alliance with Austria-Hungary and Italy in case of invasion from a foreign power. - The Triple Entente consists of 3 separate agreements. o The Franco-Russian Agreement 1894 – had the intention of encircling Germany. This was a military alliance but these two countries only promised to defend the other if Germany attacked either of them. 2 o The Franco-Russian Agreement could only be signed after the Reinsurance Treaty between Russia and Germany had lapsed. Wilhlem failed to renew it after Bismarck was dismissed meaning that Russia was now free to form alliance with another country. o The Entente Cordiale 1904 - was signed between Britain and France. The two countries agreed to stay on good terms and settled colonial disputes in Africa. Britain was following a policy of Splendid Isolation at this time – they did not want to interfere in European affairs and therefore these agreements are seen as a way of preserving British supremacy in areas that concerned them. Although this is not a military agreement Germany saw this a threat that needed to be tested. o The Anglo-Russian Alliance 1907 – another agreement that settled colonial disputes between Britain and Russia. This was signed following the first Moroccan Crisis where Russia supported France. This was not a military agreement but the result of these three agreements made Germany feel encircled. What are the key differences between the Triple Alliance and the Triple Entente? How did the alliance system cause tension in Europe? (What specific events SHOW that the alliance system led to increased tension? German Foreign Policy – Weltpolitik When Kaiser Wilhelm came to power in 1890, Germany had an incredibly small overseas empire. Why did Germany have such a small empire? How did this impact German Foreign Policy? Germany felt threatened by the big empires of Britain and France and felt that Germany should have an empire of their own. Wilhelm’s policy to achieve this was called ‘Weltpolitik’ or World Policy. Germany was looking for their ‘Place in the Sun’. To achieve this, Wilhelm was inspired by the British Empire. He believed that Britain had gained their empire through their naval power and therefore believed that Germany needed to expand their armed forces to achieve their imperial ambitions. How did Weltpolitik lead to war? Think of Why did Germany feel that Weltpolitik was specific events. justified? Why did Weltpolitik make Britain anxious? 3 The Arms Race on Land 1900-1914 - Strong armies were seen as a way of preventing wars from breaking out as they would act as a deterrent. Explain this idea in your own words. - All European powers except Britain had introduced conscription by 1914. - All nations began to make war plans. Why are the two points above significant when discussing militarism pre-1914? The Anglo-German Naval Race Britain needed a navy for three main reasons: 1) 2) 3) - Britain introduced the two power standard in 1889 in order to maintain their naval dominance. - In 1898 Wilhlem ordered Admiral Tirpitz to build up the German navy to rival Britain’s. Germany’s Second Naval Law in 1900 meant that by 1906, the size of the German navy had doubled. - In 1906, Britain introduced the dreadnought. By 1908, Germany had created their own version of the dreadnought. - The dreadnought race reached a peak in 1909. The British public were demanding for 8 dreadnoughts to be made per year. How did the naval race contribute to war? The Moroccan Crisis, 1905 The First Moroccan Crisis 1905-1906 (The Algeciras Crisis) As part of the Entente Cordiale, Britain agreed that Morocco fell within the French ‘sphere of influence’. However, Kaiser Wilhelm decided to interfere and declared that he supported Moroccan independence. He did this for two reasons: 1) To try and increase German influence in Africa. 2) To test the strength of the Entente Cordiale. This made France mad! Germany’s declaration of support for Morocco led to France threatening war. Britain suggested that a conference be held instead. 4 Leading to the Algeciras Conference (Spain) in 1906 - Austria-Hungary and Morocco supported Germany, whilst Britain and Russia supported France. - France was given joint control of the Moroccan police force, as well as control over politics and the economy. - Germany were told that they had no say over Morocco and a result felt humiliated. Key results of the Moroccan Crisis, 1905: 1) The Entente Cordiale was strengthened because Britain had supported France against Germany. They had succeeded in holding back German influence in Africa. Following the conference, France and Britain started holding secret military talks. 2) France had gained control over the economic and political affairs of Morocco. They also gained joint control of the Moroccan police force with Spain. 3) The Kaiser left the Algeciras Conference very bitter at how he had been treated by Britain and France, and the way German ambitions had been ignored. 4) In 1907, Britain and Russia signed the Anglo-Russian Agreement. Alongside the Entente Cordiale and the Franco-Russian Alliance, this formed the Triple Entente with Russia. This further threatened Germany because it felt that this new alliance was an attempt to surround it. 5) The Agadir Crisis, 1911 - In 1911 the French helped to put down a rebellion in Morocco. This provided them with an opportunity to take Morocco. - France offered compensation to countries that were concerned by these actions, however, the Kaiser sent a gunboat ‘The Panther’ to the port of Agadir in Morocco. - Germany claimed to be protecting their ‘interests’ in Morocco, but it was seen as a warlike over-reaction of Germany by Britain and France. - Britain believed that Germany wanted to set up a naval base in Morocco to challenge their one in Gibraltar. David Lloyd George made the Mansion House Speech in which he declared that Britain would be willing to go to war if their position was threatened. Key results - Another conference was held, in which Germany was given land in central Africa, the Congo. 1) Once again, Britain and France had stood firm and Wilhelm had been forced to back down. 2) Wilhelm was determined that the next contest would not be one in which he looked foolish. Germany would be unlikely to back down in any future crises. Wilhelm said: 'these events have shown the German people where its enemy is'. 3) Britain was becoming increasingly convinced that Germany wanted European domination. 4) Britain and France made a secret naval agreement whereupon Britain promised to defend the northern coast of France and France promised to defend the Mediterranean. 5) Italy opposed German actions at Agadir which pulled them further away from the Triple Alliance. Germany had to rely on Austria-Hungary more for support. 5 The Bosnian Crisis, 1908 Background to the crisis - Serbia had recently become independent (treaty of San Stefano 1878), and they believed in pan-Slavism. As Bosnia had a high percentage of Serbians living within in, they wanted Bosnia so that Greater Serbia could dominate the Balkan region. - The Balkans had been ruled by the Turkish Empire, however their power was declining (they were the ‘sick man of Europe’). - Austria-Hungary also had ideas to take over Bosnia as if Serbia were successful in spreading their nationalistic ideas then this would weaken their empire as all the nationalities within it would also want independence. The Crisis - In 1908 there was a revolution in Turkey. Austria-Hungary took the opportunity to annex Bosnia and take it into their empire. - Serbia was furious and appealed to their ally (their ‘big brother’) Russia for support. Germany had made it clear that if Russia intervened then they would declare war on Russia. As a result, both Russia and Serbia backed down. Results for the Triple Alliance Results for Russia and Serbia - Austria-Hungary was confident as - Russia was humiliated at having to they had received Germany’s let down Serbia, and promised not to let them down in the future.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • World War I Concept Learning Outline Objectives
    AP European History: Period 4.1 Teacher’s Edition World War I Concept Learning Outline Objectives I. Long-term causes of World War I 4.1.I.A INT-9 A. Rival alliances: Triple Alliance vs. Triple Entente SP-6/17/18 1. 1871: The balance of power of Europe was upset by the decisive Prussian victory in the Franco-Prussian War and the creation of the German Empire. a. Bismarck thereafter feared French revenge and negotiated treaties to isolate France. b. Bismarck also feared Russia, especially after the Congress of Berlin in 1878 when Russia blamed Germany for not gaining territory in the Balkans. 2. In 1879, the Dual Alliance emerged: Germany and Austria a. Bismarck sought to thwart Russian expansion. b. The Dual Alliance was based on German support for Austria in its struggle with Russia over expansion in the Balkans. c. This became a major feature of European diplomacy until the end of World War I. 3. Triple Alliance, 1881: Italy joined Germany and Austria Italy sought support for its imperialistic ambitions in the Mediterranean and Africa. 4. Russian-German Reinsurance Treaty, 1887 a. It promised the neutrality of both Germany and Russia if either country went to war with another country. b. Kaiser Wilhelm II refused to renew the reinsurance treaty after removing Bismarck in 1890. This can be seen as a huge diplomatic blunder; Russia wanted to renew it but now had no assurances it was safe from a German invasion. France courted Russia; the two became allies. Germany, now out of necessity, developed closer ties to Austria.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1904 Anglo-French Newfoundland Fisheries Convention: Another Look
    RESEARCH NOTES/NOTES DE RECHERCHE The 1904 Anglo-French Newfoundland Fisheries Convention: Another Look THE EXISTING LITERATURE ON ANGLO-FRENCH RELATIONS at the turn of the century, as well as that which specifically addresses the 1904 entente cordiale, for the most part makes only passing mention of the Newfoundland fisheries issue. Understandably, the focus of these accounts tends to be on the changing relations between the great powers, and on the most important aspect of the entente itself, which was the definition of boundaries and spheres of influence in North and West Africa. The exceptions are P.J.V. Rolo's study of the entente, which does recognize the crucial place of the fisheries issue in the context of the overall negotiation, and F.F. Thompson's brief account of the Newfoundland settlement from a colonial perspective in his standard work on the French, or Treaty, Shore question. i This note expands these accounts of the evolution of the 1904 Anglo-French Fisheries Convention, reinforces the view that it was vital to the successful completion of the overall package, and looks at the aftermath. This is not the place to discuss in detail the reasons for Anglo-French rapprochement which culminated in the 1904 entente cordiale. At the risk of oversimplification, one can point to several key factors. The Fashoda incident (1898) demonstrated, in time, to many French politicians that there was no hope of ending the resented British occupation of Egypt and the Nile valley. Confrontation with Britain in Africa was clearly futile, and accommodation potentially advantageous. Increasingly, the parti colonial urged the French government to consider giving up its financial and economic influence in Egypt, recognizing British predominance there, in return for British acceptance of France's ambition to establish a protectorate over Morocco and concessions elsewhere.2 Once this reasoning had been accepted and advanced by the French government, the British government eventually proved willing to respond positively (if carefully).
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Moreuil Wood
    The Battle of Moreuil Wood By Captain J.R. Grodzinski, LdSH(RC) On 9 October 1918, Lord Strathcona's Horse (Royal Canadians) fought their last battle of the First World War. Having been in reserve since August 1918, the Strathconas and the other two cavalry Regiments of the Canadian Cavalry Brigade were rushed to the front to exploit a penetration made in the German defences. In just one day, the Brigade advanced ten kilometers on a five kilometer front, capturing four hundred prisoners and numerous weapons. A spirited charge by the Strathconas over 1500 yards of open ground helped clear the village of Clary, southeast of Cambrai. This battle, which commenced at 0930 hours and finished by 1100 hours, assisted in clearing the neighboring Bois de Gattigny and the Bois du Mont-Auxvilles, Where two hundred prisoners were taken and a howitzer and forty machine guns captured. Several squadron-sized charges were made as the Regiments raced forward. The battle moved faster than senior commanders could react to and issue new instructions. This was mobile warfare, the type the cavalry longed for throughout the war. To those in the Canadian Cavalry Brigade and particularly the Strathconas this final action, known as the Battle of Le Cateau, probably brought recollection of a similar, yet more intense fight the previous spring: The Battle of Moreuil Wood on 30 March 1918. January 1918. The war was in its fourth year. Initially a mobile conflict, it quickly became a static slugging match. Intense fighting gave little advantage to either side while the numbers of casualties increased.
    [Show full text]
  • THE WESTERN FRONT World War
    INTRODUCTORY NOTES movement in their efforts to win. Also there is the opportunity to examine other aspects of life on the By 1907 Europe was divided into two armed camps Western Front which affected the life of the ordinary that involved all the major European powers, the Triple Alliance and the Triple Entente. While the alliances soldier, such as living conditions, food, medical problems, army routine, discipline and humour. were meant to increase the security of each country, instead they ensured that a war that involved any of these powers would probably involve all of them. WAR PLANS Between the Anglo-French Cordiale of 1904 and the outbreak of war in 1914, there were a number of There had not been major war in Europe since 1870. Teacher's Notes crises in Morocco and the Balkans, any of which Much had changed since then. Population growth meant could have sparked a war. more men were available to be conscripted, industrial advancements meant armies could be equipped with It was the assassination of the Austrian heir to the more devastating weapons, railways meant armies could throne, the Archduke Franz Ferdinand on June 28, be more easily moved and supplied. Every army had a 1914, that finally ignited the European powder keg. general staff, whose job it was to ensure their nations THE WESTERN Following the declaration of war on Serbia by Austria- army was properly equipped and organised for war and to Hungary on July 28, 1914, the Russian Government prepare plans to cover the most likely scenario. ordered its army to mobilise.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States Versus Germany (1891-1910)
    Illinois Wesleyan University Digital Commons @ IWU Honors Projects History Department 5-1995 Quest for Empire: The United States Versus Germany (1891-1910) Jennifer L. Cutsforth '95 Illinois Wesleyan University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/history_honproj Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Cutsforth '95, Jennifer L., "Quest for Empire: The United States Versus Germany (1891-1910)" (1995). Honors Projects. 28. https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/history_honproj/28 This Article is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Commons @ IWU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this material in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This material has been accepted for inclusion by faculty at Illinois Wesleyan University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ©Copyright is owned by the author of this document. ~lAY 12 1991 Quest For Empi re: The Uni ted states Versus Germany (1891 - 1910) Jenn1fer L. Cutsforth Senlor Research Honors Project -- Hlstory May 1995 • Quest for Emp1re: The Un1ted states versus Germany Part I: 1891 - 1900 German battleships threaten American victory at Man'ila! United States refuses to acknowledge German rights in Samoa! Germany menaces the Western Hemispherel United States reneges on agreement to support German stand at Morocco! The age of imperi aIi sm prompted head 1ines I" ke these in both American and German newspapers at the turn of the century, Although little contact took place previously between the two countries, the diplomacy which did exist had been friendly in nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronological Table
    Chronological Table 1895 25 June Salisbury's third administration 29 December Jameson raid 1896 3 January Kaiser's telegram to Kruger 1898 17 January Salisbury's unsuccessful overture to Russia for co-operation in China 25 March Cabinet decides to lease Wei-hai-wei from China 29 March Chamberlain's bid for Anglo-German al- liance 10 April Reichstag ratifies First Naval Law 4 May Salisbury's 'dying nations' speech 13 May Chamberlain's bid for friendship of U.S.A. and Germany (Birmingham speech) 14 June Anglo-French convention over West Africa 30 August Anglo-German agreement over Portuguese colonies 2 September Battle of Omdurman 18 September- December Anglo-French crisis over Fashoda 1899 21 March Anglo-French convention over Central Af­ rica: France excluded from Valley of Nile 18 May- 29 June First Hague Peace Conference 12 October Boer War begins 14 November Anglo-German agreement over Samoa 30 November Chamberlain proposes Triple Alliance (Leicester speech) 10-15 December 'Black Week' in Boer War I goo January Bundesrath affair 27-28 February Formation of London Representation Com­ mittee 17 May Relief of Mafeking CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE 259 13 June- 14 August Boxer rising in China 14 June Second German Naval Law 16 October Anglo-German agreement over China (Yangtze) November Salisbury relinquishes Foreign Office to Lansdowne 1901 22 January Death of Victoria; accession of Edward VII 12 March Lansdowne's draft alliance for German co­ operation in Far East 15 March Bulow denies China agreement's application to Manchuria March-May Anglo-German discussions continue 29 May Salisbury's objections to a German alliance 25 October Chamberlain's Edinburgh speech defending British policy in South Africa 16 December U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Violence: the German Army and Politics, 1918-1923
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2015-09-11 Republic of Violence: The German Army and Politics, 1918-1923 Bucholtz, Matthew N Bucholtz, M. N. (2015). Republic of Violence: The German Army and Politics, 1918-1923 (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/27638 http://hdl.handle.net/11023/2451 doctoral thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Republic of Violence: The German Army and Politics, 1918-1923 By Matthew N. Bucholtz A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN HISTORY CALGARY, ALBERTA SEPTEMBER, 2015 © Matthew Bucholtz 2015 Abstract November 1918 did not bring peace to Germany. Although the First World War was over, Germany began a new and violent chapter as an outbreak of civil war threatened to tear the country apart. The birth of the Weimar Republic, Germany’s first democratic government, did not begin smoothly as republican institutions failed to re-establish centralized political and military authority in the wake of the collapse of the imperial regime. Coupled with painful aftershocks from defeat in the Great War, the immediate postwar era had only one consistent force shaping and guiding political and cultural life: violence.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Attitude Toward the First Moroccan Crisis and the Algeciras Conference Betty Mullen Loyola University Chicago
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1952 The American Attitude Toward the First Moroccan Crisis and the Algeciras Conference Betty Mullen Loyola University Chicago Recommended Citation Mullen, Betty, "The American Attitude Toward the First Moroccan Crisis and the Algeciras Conference" (1952). Master's Theses. Paper 1174. http://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/1174 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1952 Betty Mullen THE AMEllIOAlf ATTItuDE TOWARD TIlE FIRST MOROCCAN CRISIS AliI> T.8E ALGECIRAS COI'FERENOB by Betty 111111_ A Thesls Submitted to the Faoulty of the Graduate Sohool of Loyola University in Partial Fulflll.eut of the Requlrements to'l! the Degr.. of Dner ot Arts June 1952 ... LIFE Betty Mullen wal born in Chicago,. 111inoi8, May 11, 1926 • She waa graduated tram St. Thoma. the Apostle High School, Chicago, IlUDOis, June, 1944, and from Rosary College, River Foreat, Illinois, June, 1948, with the degree ot Baohelor of Arta. From 1948 to 1952 the author taught History at Visitation High ~chool, Chioago, Illinois. During this period she took courses in History ~t Loyola University. 11 TABLE OF COITENTS Chapter Page I. A BACKGROUND STUDY OF THE MOROCCAN SITUATION. • • • • • • • • • 1 Importance ot Moroeco--Al1gnment of the Great Powers and the Seoret Treaties.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of the German Menace
    The Rise of the German Menace Imperial Anxiety and British Popular Culture, 1896-1903 Patrick Longson University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Doctoral Thesis for Submission to the School of History and Cultures, University of Birmingham on 18 October 2013. Examined at the University of Birmingham on 3 January 2014 by: Professor John M. MacKenzie Professor Emeritus, University of Lancaster & Professor Matthew Hilton University of Birmingham Contents Introduction 1 Chapter 1 Before the German Menace: Imperial Anxieties up to 1896 25 Chapter 2 The Kruger Telegram Crisis 43 Chapter 3 The Legacy of the Kruger Telegram, 1896-1902 70 Chapter 4 The German Imperial Menace: Popular Discourse and British Policy, 1902-1903 98 Conclusion 126 Bibliography 133 Acknowledgments The writing of this thesis has presented many varied challenges and trials. Without the support of so many people it would not have been possible. My long suffering supervisors Professor Corey Ross and Dr Kim Wagner have always been on hand to advise and inspire me. They have both gone above and beyond their obligations and I must express my sincere thanks and lasting friendship.
    [Show full text]
  • Spain's Part in the 1906 Algeciras Conference
    Spain’s Part in the 1906 Algeciras Conference: Internationalisation of the Moroccan Question and the Interests of Spain Carlos Jiménez Piernas Millán Requena Casanova Professor of Public International Law Associate Lecturer of Public and International Relations International Law and International University of Alcalá Relations University of Alicante I. The Historical Context and the Lead-up to the Conference 1. Background 2. Preliminaries. Spain’s Role in the Preparatory Stages of the Conference II. The Algeciras International Conference, 1906 1. Spanish Participation A) Composition of the Spanish Delegation B) Instructions C) The course of the Conference and Spain’s part in the settlement of the main issues D) Results: the General Act of the Algeciras Conference 2. The attitude of the political parties and public opinion to the Conference III. Conclusions I. THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT AND THE LEAD-UP TO THE CONFERENCE The centenary of the Algeciras International Conference of 1906 is an excellent occasion on which to analyse the results and repercussions of the meeting of representatives of various European powers in that town to resolve the so-called “Moroccan question”, meaning the sharing-out of its territory which European imperialism had identifi ed as its immediate objective at the beginning of the 20th century. We shall look particularly at the part played by Spain at this Conference in order to gauge the extent of its participation in the settlement of the colonial confl ict that had arisen in connection with Morocco and the international crisis that 1 Spanish Yearbook of International Law, Volume XII, 2008 © 2008 Koninklijke Brill NV.
    [Show full text]
  • Diplomacy, Finance and the Coming of War, 1890-1914
    Last revised 7 May 2005 Political Risk and the International Bond Market between the 1848 Revolution and the Outbreak of the First World War Niall Ferguson Laurence A. Tisch Professor of History Harvard University [email protected] Abstract This article uses price data and editorial commentaries from the contemporary financial press to measure the impact of political events on investors’ expectations from the middle of the nineteenth century until the First World War. The main question addressed is why political events appeared to affect the world’s biggest financial market, the London bond market, much less between 1881 and 1914 than they had between 1843 and 1880. In particular, I ask why the outbreak of the First World War, an event traditionally seen as having been heralded by a series of international crises, was not apparently anticipated by investors. The article considers how far the declining sensitivity of the bond market to political events was due to the spread of the gold standard, increased international financial integration or changes in the fiscal policies of the great powers. I suggest that the increasing national separation of bond markets offers a better explanation. However, even this structural change cannot explain why the London market was so slow to appreciate the risk of war in 1914. To investors the First World War truly came as a bolt from the blue. Forthcoming in the Economic History Review 1 Political risk and the international bond market between the 1848 Revolution and the outbreak of the First World War1 By NIALL FERGUSON Before 1914 it was widely believed that a major European war would have drastic consequences for financial markets.
    [Show full text]
  • The Alliance System Before 1900
    How and why did the Alliance System form? L/O – To understand the key features of the alliance system before 1914 Starter – How was the most powerful nation in Europe? Who was second? What is an Alliance? An alliance is an agreement between one or more states to work together. Alliances usually involve making promises to protect the other country against nations who are not in the alliance. These promises are usually made by the signing of treaties. Why were Alliances made? The aim of forming alliances was to achieve collective security – having alliances with other powerful countries deterred your enemies from attacking you. If a country started a war with one nation it would have to fight all its allies as well. Alliances were often made in reaction to national rivalries – when one country felt threatened by another, it often looked to secure friendships with other nations. By 1900, Europe was full of national rivalries. Why were alliances made? There were two main sources of national rivalries: The creation of Germany in 1871 out of the many smaller Germanic states had been opposed by France, resulting in the Franco-Prussian War of 1870–71. The Germans invaded France and forced the French to sign a humiliating peace treaty. This meant that France and Germany hated each other. The Ottoman (Turkish) Empire in Eastern Europe was crumbling. Russia sought to take advantage of this to expand west into the Balkans. Austria-Hungary wanted to prevent Russian expansion. National Rivalries A dinner party The Rise of Germany • By 1900, the Great Powers in Europe were beginning to divide themselves into two separate groups.
    [Show full text]