DOCSLIB.ORG

Chronological Table

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chronological Table Chronological Table 1895 25 June Salisbury's third administration 29 December Jameson raid 1896 3 January Kaiser's telegram to Kruger 1898 17 January Salisbury's unsuccessful overture to Russia for co-operation in China 25 March Cabinet decides to lease Wei-hai-wei from China 29 March Chamberlain's bid for Anglo-German al- liance 10 April Reichstag ratifies First Naval Law 4 May Salisbury's 'dying nations' speech 13 May Chamberlain's bid for friendship of U.S.A. and Germany (Birmingham speech) 14 June Anglo-French convention over West Africa 30 August Anglo-German agreement over Portuguese colonies 2 September Battle of Omdurman 18 September- December Anglo-French crisis over Fashoda 1899 21 March Anglo-French convention over Central Af­ rica: France excluded from Valley of Nile 18 May- 29 June First Hague Peace Conference 12 October Boer War begins 14 November Anglo-German agreement over Samoa 30 November Chamberlain proposes Triple Alliance (Leicester speech) 10-15 December 'Black Week' in Boer War I goo January Bundesrath affair 27-28 February Formation of London Representation Com­ mittee 17 May Relief of Mafeking CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE 259 13 June- 14 August Boxer rising in China 14 June Second German Naval Law 16 October Anglo-German agreement over China (Yangtze) November Salisbury relinquishes Foreign Office to Lansdowne 1901 22 January Death of Victoria; accession of Edward VII 12 March Lansdowne's draft alliance for German co­ operation in Far East 15 March Bulow denies China agreement's application to Manchuria March-May Anglo-German discussions continue 29 May Salisbury's objections to a German alliance 25 October Chamberlain's Edinburgh speech defending British policy in South Africa 16 December U.S. Senate approves Hay - Pauncefote Treaty with Britain 19 December Lansdowne again approaches Germany un- successfully 1902 30 January Anglo-Japanese Treaty 31 May Peace of Vereeniging in South Africa 28 June Triple Alliance renewed by Germany, Austria - Hungary and Italy II July Salisbury retires, succeeded by Balfour 9 August Fourth Colonial Conference December Venezuelan crisis 18 December First meeting of Committee of Imperial Defence 1903 1-4 May Edward VII's state visit to Paris 15 May Lansdowne warns Russia ofT Persian Gulf 6-9July Visit of Loubet and Delcasse to London 2 October Murzsteg programme (Russo-Austrian) for Macedonian reforms 190 4 8 February Outbreak of Russo-Japanese War 8 April Anglo-French Entente 7 September Anglo-Tibetan Treaty signed at Lhasa 21 October Sir John Fisher becomes First Sea Lord 21 October Dogger Bank incident 12 December Redistribution of British fleet 260 BRITAIN & ORIGINS OF THE FIRST WORLD WAR 190 5 2 January Fall of Port Arthur to Japanese 22 January Outbreak of revolution in Russia 31 March German Emperor visits Tangier 27 May Destruction of Russian fleet at Tsushima 6 June Delcasse resigns 24 July German and Russian emperors sign agree­ ment at Bjorko 12 August Anglo-J apanese alliance renewed 5 September Treaty of Portsmouth ends Russo-Japanese War 4 December Conservative Cabinet resigns I I December Campbell-Bannerman forms Liberal admin- istration 15 December Anglo-French staff talks begin 1906 January General Election; Liberal victory IO January Grey authorises General Staff conversations 16 January Algeciras Conference opens IO February Dreadnought launched 7 April Algeciras Act signed 5 June German Third Naval Law (Novelle 1906) ratified 15 August Edward VII, accompanied by Hardinge, meets William II at Cronberg 190 7 15 June- 18 October Second Hague Peace Conference 3 1 August Anglo-Russian convention 27 November C.I.D. subcommittee to reconsider question of invasion 1908 16 February William II writes to Lord Tweedmouth about Britain and German navy 5 April Asquith becomes Prime Minister 22 April Campbell-Bannerman dies 23 April Baltic (Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Russia) and North Sea (Great Britain, Germany, Denmark, France, the Nether­ lands and Sweden) Conventions 12 June Edward VII and Nicholas II meet at Reval 14 June Fourth German Naval Law (Novelle 1908) ratified Young Turk Revolution CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE 261 I I August Edward VII and Hardinge meet William 11 at Friedrichshof 16 September Buchlau agreement between Isvolski and Aehrenthal 25 September Casablanca affair between Germany and France 6 October Austrian annexation of Bosnia and Herzo­ govina 28 October Daily Telegraph affair (publication of in­ discreet remarks by Emperor William) 3 December C.I.D. subcommittee on military needs of Empire as influenced by Continent 4 December London Naval Conference 190 9 8 February Franco-German agreement over Morocco February- March Cabinet discussions on naval estimates 12 March Commons debate on shipbuilding pro­ gramme 22 March German ultimatum to Russia over Austrian annexations 29 April Finance Bill introduced in Commons 14 July Bethmann Hollweg replaces Bulow 30 July Lloyd George's Limehouse speech 19 August Imperial Conference on Defence August- November Anglo-German negotiations 30 November Lords reject budget November- December Gwinner - Cassel negotiations over Bagh­ dad Railway I9IO 15 January General Election; Liberal administration retained 27-28 April Budget passed 6 May Death of Edward VII; accession of George V 16 June Constitutional conference over Lords reform 3 September Lock-out in Lancashire cotton mills 4-5 November William II and Nicholas II meet at Potsdam 7 November Tonypandy miners riot, troops sent December General Election; Liberal administration retained IgIl 21 February Parliament Bill introduced 262 BRITAIN & ORIGINS OF THE FIRST WORLD WAR 21 May French occupy Fez 14 June Seamen's strike 27 June Caillaux becomes French Premier I July Panther sent to Agadir 20 July Parliament Bill passed by Lords 21 July Lloyd George's Mansion House speech I August London dockworkers' strike 18 August Railwaymen's strike 23 August C.LD. meeting decides between naval and military strategies 28 September Outbreak of Italo-Turkish War 4 November Franco-German accord over Morocco 8 November Balfour resigns as leader of Conservative party 19 12 14 January Poincare becomes French Premier 8-1 I February Haldane visits Berlin March Miners' strike 13 March Serbia and Bulgaria form Balkan League 18 March Churchill proposes redistribution of fleet I I April Third Irish Home Rule Bill introduced 23 May Dockers' strike 4 July C.LD. meeting on naval dispositions 22 July French fleet at Brest moved to Toulon August Beginning of Marconi scandal 15 October Treaty of Lausanne ends Italo-Turkish War 18 October Outbreak of First Balkan War 2 I -22 October Grey-Cambon letters exchanged 3 December Armistice between Turkey and Balkan states 5 December Triple Alliance renewed 16 December Ambassadorial conference opens in London 1913 January Poincare elected President of France 26 March Churchill proposes 'naval holiday' 30 May Treaty of London ends First Balkan War 29 June Outbreak of Second Balkan War 7 August French Army Bill ratified (3-year military service) I I August Treaty of Bucharest ends Second Balkan War. Anglo-German agreement over Por- tuguese colonies initialled 18 October Churchill again proposes 'naval holiday' CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE 263 November- December Liman von Sanders crisis 1914 20 March Curragh incident 22-24 April George V and Grey visit Paris 26 May Home Rule Bill passed for third time 14 June Nicholas II and Sazonov visit Constanza and Bucharest 15 June Anglo-German Baghdad Railway agree­ ment initialled 23 June Home Rule Amending Act introduced (ex­ clusion of Ulster without time-limit) 28 June Assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand at Sarajevo 20-23 July Poincare and Viviani visit St Petersburg 23 July Austrian ultimatum to Serbia 21-24 July Buckingham Palace conference on Irish pro­ blem 24 July Grey consults Cabinet on Austro-Serbian CriSIS 28 July Austria declares war on Serbia 29 July Grey's warning to Lichnowsky. Bethmann Hollweg's bid for British neutrality 30 July Austria - Hungary orders general mobilis­ ation for 31 July. Russia orders general mobilisation for 31 July 3 1 July Kaiser proclaims 'state of imminent war'. German ultimatum to Russia 1 August Germany declares war on Russia and mo­ bilises 2 August Cabinet agrees to protect north coast of France and Channel against German at­ tack. Germany invades Luxemburg, sends ultimatum to Belgium 3 August Germany declares war on France. Belgium rejects German ultimatum. British mo­ bilise army. Cabinet agrees to send ulti­ matum to Berlin 4 August Germany invades Belgium. British ulti­ matum sent; expires at midnight 6 August Austria - Hungary declares war on Russia. Cabinet agrees to send B.E.F. Jo France 12 August Britain declares war on Austria - Hungary Bibliography I. BASIC BACKGROUND READING STUDENTS should refer to the bibliography in F. H. Hinsley (ed.), The Foreign Policy of Sir Edward Grey (Cambridge, 1977) for general diplomatic sources and official publications which are not included here. For further details relating to British diplomatic history, special attention should be given to the following: L. ALBERTINI, The Origins of the War of 1914 (London, 1965) V. R. BERGHAHN, Germany and the Approach of War in 1914 (London, 1973) L. GEISS (ed.), July 1914: Outbreak of the First World War-Selected Documents (London, 1967) J. A. S. GRENVILLE, Lord Salisbury and Foreign Policy: The Close of the Nineteenth Century (London, 1964) C. HAZLEHURST, Politicians at War: July 1914- May 1915 (London, 1971) F. H. HINSLEY (ed.). British Foreign Policy under Sir Edward Grey (London 1976) C. J. LOWE AND M. L. DOCKRILL (eds), The Mirage of Power, 3 vols (London, 1972) G. W. MONGER, The End of Isolation: British Foreign Policy, 1900-1907 (London, 1963) I. NISH, The Anglo-Japanese Alliance: The Diplomacy of Two Island Empires, 1894-1907 (London, 1966) A.J. P. TAYLOR, TheStrugglefor Mastfry in Europe, 1848-1914 (Oxford, 1954) S. WILLIAMSON, The Politics of Grand Strategy: Britain and France Preparefor War, ]904-]914 (Cambridge, Mass., 1969) For further information on the domestic situation during the Edward­ ian period, the following remain indispensable: E.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • World War I Concept Learning Outline Objectives
    AP European History: Period 4.1 Teacher’s Edition World War I Concept Learning Outline Objectives I. Long-term causes of World War I 4.1.I.A INT-9 A. Rival alliances: Triple Alliance vs. Triple Entente SP-6/17/18 1. 1871: The balance of power of Europe was upset by the decisive Prussian victory in the Franco-Prussian War and the creation of the German Empire. a. Bismarck thereafter feared French revenge and negotiated treaties to isolate France. b. Bismarck also feared Russia, especially after the Congress of Berlin in 1878 when Russia blamed Germany for not gaining territory in the Balkans. 2. In 1879, the Dual Alliance emerged: Germany and Austria a. Bismarck sought to thwart Russian expansion. b. The Dual Alliance was based on German support for Austria in its struggle with Russia over expansion in the Balkans. c. This became a major feature of European diplomacy until the end of World War I. 3. Triple Alliance, 1881: Italy joined Germany and Austria Italy sought support for its imperialistic ambitions in the Mediterranean and Africa. 4. Russian-German Reinsurance Treaty, 1887 a. It promised the neutrality of both Germany and Russia if either country went to war with another country. b. Kaiser Wilhelm II refused to renew the reinsurance treaty after removing Bismarck in 1890. This can be seen as a huge diplomatic blunder; Russia wanted to renew it but now had no assurances it was safe from a German invasion. France courted Russia; the two became allies. Germany, now out of necessity, developed closer ties to Austria.
    [Show full text]
  • Yorktown Victory Center Replacement Will Be Named 'American Revolution Museum at Yorktown'
    DISPATCH A Newsletter of the Jamestown-Yorktown Foundation • Spring 2012 Yorktown Victory Center Replacement Will Be Named ‘American Revolution Museum at Yorktown’ Along with a physical transforma- bonds, is estimated at $46 tion of the Yorktown Victory Center will million. Private donations come a new name – “American Revolu- to the Jamestown-Yorktown tion Museum at Yorktown” – adopted Foundation, Inc., will sup- May 10 by the Jamestown-Yorktown port elements of gallery Foundation Board of Trustees and and outdoor exhibits and endorsed by the Jamestown-Yorktown educational resources. Foundation, Inc., Board of Directors. “The new name high- Recommended by a board naming lights the core offering of study task force, the new name will the museum, American be implemented upon completion of Revolution history,” said the museum replacement, and in the Frank B. Atkinson, who meantime the Yorktown Victory Center chaired the naming study will continue in operation as a museum task force comprised of 11 The distinctive two-story main entrance of the American of the American Revolution. members of the Jamestown- Revolution Museum at Yorktown will serve as a focal point Construction is expected to start Yorktown Foundation for arriving visitors. in the second half of 2012 on the proj- and Jamestown-Yorktown name were identified, and research ect, which includes an 80,000-square- Foundation, Inc., boards, “and the in- was undertaken on names currently in foot structure that will encompass ex- clusion of the word ‘Yorktown’ provides use. Selected names were tested with panded exhibition galleries, classrooms a geographical anchor. We arrived Yorktown Victory Center visitors and and support functions, and reorganiza- at this choice through a methodical reviewed by a trademark attorney and tion of the 22-acre site.
    [Show full text]
  • REVOLUTION GOES EAST Studies of the Weatherhead East Asian Institute, Columbia University
    REVOLUTION GOES EAST Studies of the Weatherhead East Asian Institute, Columbia University The Studies of the Weatherhead East Asian Institute of Columbia University were inaugu rated in 1962 to bring to a wider public the results of significant new research on modern and contemporary East Asia. REVOLUTION GOES EAST Imperial Japan and Soviet Communism Tatiana Linkhoeva CORNELL UNIVERSITY PRESS ITHACA AND LONDON This book is freely available in an open access edition thanks to TOME (Toward an Open Monograph Ecosystem)—a collaboration of the Association of American Universities, the Association of University Presses, and the Association of Research Libraries—and the generous support of New York University. Learn more at the TOME website, which can be found at the following web address: openmono graphs.org. The text of this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International: https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0. To use this book, or parts of this book, in any way not covered by the license, please contact Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850. Visit our website at cornellpress. cornell.edu. Copyright © 2020 by Cornell University First published 2020 by Cornell University Press Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Linkhoeva, Tatiana, 1979– author. Title: Revolution goes east : imperial Japan and Soviet communism / Tatiana Linkhoeva. Description: Ithaca [New York] : Cornell University Press, 2020. | Series: Studies of the Weatherhead East Asian Institute, Columbia University | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2019020874 (print) | LCCN 2019980700 (ebook) | ISBN 9781501748080 (pbk) | ISBN 9781501748097 (epub) | ISBN 9781501748103 (pdf) Subjects: LCSH: Communism—Japan—History—20th century.
    [Show full text]
  • WWI Study Guide: Causes
    Unit VII: WWI Study Guide: Causes IB Syllabus Details: The First World War • Diplomacy, alliances, ententes • Imperialism, arms race • Nationalism, incidents, Balkan wars • Social and economic changes during and after the War • Versailles and other treaties • Post-war economic and political problems Study Questions: 1. Why were both the French and the British concerned about German aspirations after 1870? 2. What developments led the British to abandon their “splendid isolation”? 3. How were European international relations affected in the years 1905 to 1913 by the crises over a) Morocco and b) the Balkans? Quotes: How far do you agree with the following quotes? 1. “It had long been felt that a unified Germany would revolutionize the relationships of the European peoples; after 1870 these anticipations were confirmed.” 2. “The Serbs conceived of their small kingdom as the Piedmont of the South Slav Risorgimento.” 3. “The Balkan crisis of 1914 proved fatal because two others had gone before it, leaving feelings of exasperation in Austria, desperation in Serbia, and humiliation in Russia.” 4. “Although it is not true that Germany started the war, as its enemies in 194 popularly believed, it must be granted that its policies had for some years been rather peremptory, arrogant, devious, and obstinate.” 5. “The alliance system was an obvious cause of the war, but it was only a symptom of deeper trouble- the world had an international economy but a national polity.” Identification: Know what each item is and its importance. Dual Alliance 1879 “Splendid isolation” Triple Alliance Franco-Russian Alliance Entente cordiale Triple entente Annexation of Bosnia Black Hand Sarajevo crisis German “blank check” WWI Study Guide- Course of War Study questions: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of the German Menace
    The Rise of the German Menace Imperial Anxiety and British Popular Culture, 1896-1903 Patrick Longson University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Doctoral Thesis for Submission to the School of History and Cultures, University of Birmingham on 18 October 2013. Examined at the University of Birmingham on 3 January 2014 by: Professor John M. MacKenzie Professor Emeritus, University of Lancaster & Professor Matthew Hilton University of Birmingham Contents Introduction 1 Chapter 1 Before the German Menace: Imperial Anxieties up to 1896 25 Chapter 2 The Kruger Telegram Crisis 43 Chapter 3 The Legacy of the Kruger Telegram, 1896-1902 70 Chapter 4 The German Imperial Menace: Popular Discourse and British Policy, 1902-1903 98 Conclusion 126 Bibliography 133 Acknowledgments The writing of this thesis has presented many varied challenges and trials. Without the support of so many people it would not have been possible. My long suffering supervisors Professor Corey Ross and Dr Kim Wagner have always been on hand to advise and inspire me. They have both gone above and beyond their obligations and I must express my sincere thanks and lasting friendship.
    [Show full text]
  • Topical Essays ------17 It 6
    Topical Essays The Importance of Alliances for U.S. Security Martin Murphy “No man is an island, entire of itself,” wrote as influential at various times as the United the English poet John Donne in 1624.1 The States or Great Britain, can disengage from same is true of nations. the world. Such a nation must instead be free The United States now sits at the apex of an to choose when to engage and when not to en- international network of alliances brought to- gage—and, most momentously, when to go to gether during the Cold War, but this has not al- war and when to walk away. ways been America’s situation. In earlier times, especially at its inception, the U.S. benefited Wisdom and Utility of Alliances from alliances, generally as the junior partner. An equally spirited debate about the wis- Success in the Revolutionary War was helped dom and utility of alliances continues today. by a crucial alliance with France, a country that Repeatedly, alliances are referred to as bur- the infant U.S. shortly thereafter fought in the dens, an elastic term that can be stretched 2 undeclared Quasi-War (1798–1800). to include everything from moral hazard to It is true that George Washington, in his free riding. Farewell Address of 1796, warned his coun- The burden of moral hazard is that states, trymen that they should not “entangle our including states of roughly equivalent weights, peace and prosperity in the toils of European may feel emboldened to pursue riskier for- ambition,” an admonition that has come to be eign policies because their allies are obligated viewed as a warning against “foreign entan- to come to their rescue.
    [Show full text]
  • Identity, 1898–1910
    THE AMERICAN WAY OF EMPIRE: NATIONAL TRADITION AND TRANSATLANTIC ADAPTATION IN AMERICA’S SEARCH FOR IMPERIAL IDENTITY, 1898–1910 Frank Schumacher1 University of Erfurt GHI Postdoctoral Fellow, 2002 After victory in the Spanish-American War of 1898, the United States acquired substantial colonial possessions in the Caribbean and the Pacific Ocean. This turn from anticolonial to imperial republic has puzzled stu- dents of American history ever since. Coming to terms with empire has been a difficult and sometimes tedious process. Two main issues still need further clarification: first, the connection between American continental expansion and overseas colonialism and, second, the relationship between American and European approaches to empire and colonialism. So far, historians have provided ambivalent an- swers to the first and paid little attention to the second issue. Recent studies arguing for continuities between continental and overseas expan- sion have explicitly emphasized the exceptional character of the Ameri- can empire; whereas studies placing the American approach to empire within an international discourse on colonialism have tended to minimize the national experience of continental expansion. This essay explores possible thematic links between the experience of continental expansion and insights derived from the analysis of other colonial powers and suggests that both dimensions were equally impor- tant to colonial state building in the American Philippines. Rather than viewing the acquisition of overseas territories as a new departure, Ameri- cans projected the experiences gathered in the conquest of the American West and the subsequent defeat of native Americans onto the islands in so many ways that the Indian analogy became a constant reference point for military leaders, administrators, and educators, as well as opponents of empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Diplomacy, Finance and the Coming of War, 1890-1914
    Last revised 7 May 2005 Political Risk and the International Bond Market between the 1848 Revolution and the Outbreak of the First World War Niall Ferguson Laurence A. Tisch Professor of History Harvard University [email protected] Abstract This article uses price data and editorial commentaries from the contemporary financial press to measure the impact of political events on investors’ expectations from the middle of the nineteenth century until the First World War. The main question addressed is why political events appeared to affect the world’s biggest financial market, the London bond market, much less between 1881 and 1914 than they had between 1843 and 1880. In particular, I ask why the outbreak of the First World War, an event traditionally seen as having been heralded by a series of international crises, was not apparently anticipated by investors. The article considers how far the declining sensitivity of the bond market to political events was due to the spread of the gold standard, increased international financial integration or changes in the fiscal policies of the great powers. I suggest that the increasing national separation of bond markets offers a better explanation. However, even this structural change cannot explain why the London market was so slow to appreciate the risk of war in 1914. To investors the First World War truly came as a bolt from the blue. Forthcoming in the Economic History Review 1 Political risk and the international bond market between the 1848 Revolution and the outbreak of the First World War1 By NIALL FERGUSON Before 1914 it was widely believed that a major European war would have drastic consequences for financial markets.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Chamberlain and Foreign Policy, 1895-1903
    Joseph Chamberlain and Foreign Policy, 1895-1903. Dominic Michel Bray This thesis is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Phd) at The University of East Anglia. School of History. September 2015 ©”This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that use of any information derived there from must be in accordance with current UK Copyright Law. In addition, any quotation or extract must include full attribution.” Abstract This thesis investigates Joseph Chamberlain’s conceptualisations of foreign policy while colonial secretary, 1895 to 1903. While Chamberlain’s influential position has been noted in the historiography it has not been central to any study. Therefore Chamberlain’s motivation and aims are not clearly understood. Most often his ideas are contrasted with Salisbury’s, who currently enjoys a very high reputation as a realpolitck Foreign Secretary, with a clear sense of perspective and direction. This study will therefore reconsider how Chamberlain’s opinions interacted with Salisbury’s. The current debate also under-represents Balfour’s own dissention from Salisbury and his own bid to control or influence British foreign policy. Therefore, this study sits firmly within the debate on British Isolation while acknowledging the Decline debate. Chamberlain was motivated to solve the problem of defending British interests, formal and informal, while Britain suffered from over-extension. His interest in a German alliance was heightened by events in China but was not limited to them; hence he was not content with the security afforded by the Anglo-Japanese alliance.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Brothers Across the Ocean?
    Our Brothers Across the Ocean? Unionist Diplomacy, the Lansdowne Foreign Office, and the Anglo-American 'Special Relationship', 1900-1905 BY Iestyn Michael Adams Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of PhD. The University of Leeds Department of History February 2002 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS During the conception and preparation of this thesis, I have received valuable assistance from my postgraduate supervisor, Dr. Keith Wilson, who has offered me encouragement and guidance throughout the last four years. He clearly understood my goals and interests, and has frequently given me much needed advice. Without his help, needless to say, this book would not exist I am also indebted to the staff of the Public Record Office, the British Library and the Brotherton Library of the University of Leeds. I particularly wish to thank Robert Smith - the Curator of the as yet uncatalogued Lansdowne collection in the British Library - who gave me his time, and who suggested further research avenues. On a personal note, I gratefully acknowledge the support from friends and family, especially my parents and Colette Maher. My final words of thanks go Andrea Myers, Peter Myers and Richie Lane who, together, helped to provide accomodation during my frequent trips to London. 1 ABSTRACT This study is intended as a detailed exploration of British diplomacy with the United States in the first five years of the twentieth century, that is, the period during which the Marquis of Lansdowne presided at the Foreign Office.
    [Show full text]
  • “Splendid Isolation”?
    Crossing Borders: A Multidisciplinary Journal of Undergraduate Scholarship Volume 4 Issue 1 Article 4 2020 Was the German Battlefleet Programme the Main Reason for the End of Britain’s “Splendid Isolation”? Nathan Brewster University of Leeds, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://newprairiepress.org/crossingborders Part of the Diplomatic History Commons, European History Commons, and the Political History Commons This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Recommended Citation Brewster, Nathan (2020) "Was the German Battlefleet Programme the Main Reason for the End of Britain’s “Splendid Isolation”?," Crossing Borders: A Multidisciplinary Journal of Undergraduate Scholarship: Vol. 4: Iss. 1. https://doi.org/10.4148/2373-0978.1069 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by New Prairie Press. It has been accepted for inclusion in Crossing Borders: A Multidisciplinary Journal of Undergraduate Scholarship by an authorized administrator of New Prairie Press. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Was the German Battlefleet Programme the Main Reason for the End of Britain’s “Splendid Isolation”? Abstract This historiographical essay challenges the common historical narrative that Britain left 'splendid isolation' as a result of perceived German aggression - particularly considering Germany's battlefleet programme. Investigating closer Anglo-American ties, the Anglo-Japanese agreement and the Entente Cordiale show that Britain started to abandon an isolationist policy due to its vast, global and often burdensome empire before the German battlefleet started to present itself as a problem. Rather than pinning Britain's alliances at the turn of the twentieth-century on one factor in Europe, this essay investigates the impact the Americas, Africa, Central Asia and the Far East had on Britain's changing international position.
    [Show full text]
  • Pan-Pacific Union
    Vol. XL. No. 6 25 Cents a Copy December, 1930 MID-PACIFIC MAGAZINE, A JAPAN PAN-PACIFIC CLUB NUMBER IN HONOR OF PRINCE TOKUGAWA'S VISIT TO THE PAN-PACIFIC CLUB OF HONOLULU His Majesty Hirohito, the Emperor of Japan. When the Pan-Pacific Association of Japan was formed, a decade ago, Prince Iyesato Tokugawa as its first (and present) president, sent by Consul General Yada a silken Japanese flag, which was presented on the capitol steps in Honolulu to the then Governor Wallace R. Farrington, President of the Pan-Pacific Union. g 1 OOL'Mnflinatt,ColatiathaOn AA ''''''M: 11 4. f. 11 4.• h 11 1; TI-Ir artur aga3tur . CONDUCTED BY ALEXANDER HUME FORD . Volume XL . N umber 6 . • CONTENTS FOR DECEMBER, 1930 • . • Proceedings of the Pan-Pacific Club of Tokyo: .9 q Meet the American Ambassador and Old Friends at the • Pan-Pacific Club of Tokyo 503 • Friends in China 509 • By Gilbert Bowles • • • Australia and Her Workers 513 By Arthur Garrels, U. S. Consul General . • • 41 New Conditions in China 517 4. • By George Bronson Rea ez President Viscount Inouye Goes Abroad and Mr. F. H. • Brown Talks on "Athletics in Japan" - - - - 523 . Research in English Literature 529 -4 By Professor P. Huntley . • Japanese in North America 532 . 1 By Professor Shimji Yonemoto • 4 Dr. Sherwood Eddy Talks on "India" and Dr. Kirby Page • on the "Pact of Paris" 537 • . The Interdependence of Nations 543 . 2 Sir John Tilley,By British Ambassador to Japan 4 • „ Rejuvenation Reaches Japan 547 .• -.. By Professor Serge Voronoff • ED Japan's Mission of Gratitude 551 .
    [Show full text]