DOCSLIB.ORG

The Fog of Law an Introduction to the Legal Erosion of British Fighting Power

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Fog of Law an Introduction to the Legal Erosion of British Fighting Power The Fog of Law An introduction to the legal erosion of British fighting power Thomas Tugendhat and Laura Croft Foreword by the Rt Hon Lord Justice Moses Policy Exchange is the UK’s leading think tank. We are an educational charity whose mission is to develop and promote new policy ideas that will deliver better public services, a stronger society and a more dynamic economy. Registered charity no: 1096300. Policy Exchange is committed to an evidence-based approach to policy development. We work in partnership with academics and other experts and commission major studies involving thorough empirical research of alternative policy outcomes. We believe that the policy experience of other countries offers important lessons for government in the UK. We also believe that government has much to learn from business and the voluntary sector. Trustees Daniel Finkelstein (Chairman of the Board), Richard Ehrman (Deputy Chair), Theodore Agnew, Richard Briance, Simon Brocklebank-Fowler, Robin Edwards, Virginia Fraser, Edward Heathcoat Amory, David Meller, George Robinson, Robert Rosenkranz, Andrew Sells, Charles Stewart-Smith, Patience Wheatcroft and Simon Wolfson. © Policy Exchange 2013 Published by Policy Exchange, Clutha House, 10 Storey’s Gate, London SW1P 3AY www.policyexchange.org.uk ISBN: 978-1-907689-60-4 Printed by Heron, Dawson and Sawyer Designed by Soapbox, www.soapbox.co.uk 2 | policyexchange.org.uk About the Authors Thomas Tugendhat is a strategy consultant and a Territorial Army Lieutenant Colonel. His most recent period of active service was as Military Assistant to the Chief of the Defence Staff, General Sir David Richards. Previously, he served operationally in Afghanistan and Iraq. He was also a diplomat, serving as the adviser to Afghanistan’s National Security Adviser and later to the Governor of Helmand province, during the period when British forces arrived in Southern Afghanistan (2006). Immediately after the Afghan Government and ISAF forces recaptured Musa Qala, a town in northern Helmand with 30,000 inhabitants, Tom was acting governor. He was awarded the MBE (Military) for his efforts on operations. In his civilian career, he has worked in energy, consulting, communications and journalism, in the Middle East and the UK. Tom graduated in Theology from Bristol University and did his Master’s degree in Islamic Studies at Cambridge University. Laura Croft is a retired US Army Lieutenant Colonel who served as a lawyer in the Judge Advocate General’s Corps. She served with the British Army on secondment as a member of the Strategy Branch for the Chief of the General Staff. Prior to that, while on secondment to Army Legal Services, she was responsible for teaching the Law of Armed Conflict, the Rules of Engagement, and Detention Operations to British Army personnel of all ranks. She also served as chairman of the NATO Law of Armed Conflict Training Working Group. Lieutenant Colonel Croft deployed to Iraq and served as Deputy Staff Judge Advocate (DSJA) for the multi-national division in Mosul. Before that, she was legal adviser to the 173rd Airborne Brigade in Kirkuk and the DSJA for the 10th Mountain Division/Combined Joint Task Force-180 in Bagram, Afghanistan. Laura graduated from Brown University in Providence. She received her J.D. from Louisiana State University Law School and her LL.M. in military law. She is a member of three Bars: the US Supreme Court, the Louisiana State Bar and the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. Her awards and decorations include the Legion of Merit, Bronze Star medal, the Combat Action Badge, the Airborne Badge, the Meritorious Service Ribbon (three awards); and the Joint Service Commendation Medal (two awards). Laura is married to a British Army officer. policyexchange.org.uk | 3 “It is of paramount importance that the work that the armed forces do in the national interest should not be impeded by having to prepare for or conduct active operations against the enemy under the threat of litigation if things should go wrong.”1 Lord Hope, former Deputy President of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom “I know somebody ... who was heavily criticised by the coroner because he had to make a split-second decision without a complete intelligence picture, which you have to make in war, and someone was killed. The inquest on this boy who was killed blamed the company commander. That seemed to me absolutely wrong because if you are so worried about having a lawyer, or an international lawyer, following you around the battlefield, you will not do anything”.2 Field Marshal Lord Guthrie of Craigiebank, former Chief of the Defence Staff Pale Ebenezer thought it wrong to fight, But Roaring Bill (who killed him) thought it right.3 Hilaire Belloc 1 Lord Hope, para 100: Smith and Others v The Ministry of Defence [2013] UKSC 41 2 Lord Guthrie of Craigiebank, Oral Evidence to the House of Lords Select Committee on the Constitution: Inquiry into the Constitutional Arrangements for the Use of Armed Force, 5 June 2013, p 22. www.parliament.uk/ documents/lords-committees/ constitution/Armed%20Force/ COMPLETE%20armed%20 force%20evidence%20volume.pdf 3 Hilaire Belloc, “The Pacifist”, 1938 4 | policyexchange.org.uk Contents Acknowledgments 6 Foreword 7 Executive Summary 10 Introduction: Legal siege – what it means and how it has come about 14 1 Coroners’ courts, judicial oversight and the imposition of civilian ‘duty of care’ standards upon the armed forces 22 2 Smith and Others v the Ministry of Defence: the apogee of judicial encroachment 28 3 The importance of detention in war 37 4 Risk taking, military judgment and decision making: the case of the Military Aviation Authority 43 5 ‘Train as you fight’ and the impact of legislation on readiness 47 Conclusion: the impact on operational effectiveness 54 Options 56 Appendix A: Glossary of terms 63 Appendix B: Timeline 64 Appendix C: Table of cases 70 policyexchange.org.uk | 5 Acknowledgments Policy Exchange and the authors wish to acknowledge first and foremost the generous assistance of The Blavatnik Family Foundation and Krishna Rao in making this report possible. This project would never have come to completion without the superlative help of Lynne Middleton, Research Fellow for Security Policy at Policy Exchange – for whom nothing was too much. Two friends of Policy Exchange deserve particular thanks for their unstinting support and wisdom: Lord Carlile of Berriew, QC, CBE, former Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation, whose understanding of the intersection of law, national security policy and politics is unmatched. A great debt is also owed to Lieutenant General Sir Paul Newton, KBE – one of the finest thinkers of his generation in the British Army and now Director of the Strategy and Security Institute at the University of Exeter. The Army’s loss is Exeter’s gain. Brigadier Phil McEvoy, OBE, formerly deputy Director of the Service Prosecuting Authority, gave unstinting and invaluable guidance. Appreciation is also owed to the following individuals who kindly helped us – not all of whom will necessarily agree with every recommendation here. They include: Sir Dan Bethlehem, KCMG, QC, former principal Legal Adviser of the FCO; Lord Faulks of Donnington, QC; Captain Thomas Hughes of St Antony’s College, Oxford and the 9th/12th Royal Lancers; Dame Joan Higgins, DBE of the NHS Litigation Authority; the Rt Hon Lord Hutton; Major General Andrew Mackay, CBE, former Commander of the Helmand Task Force; Sir Michael Pakenham, KBE, CMG of The Blavatnik Family Foundation; Air Chief Marshal Sir Stuart Peach, Vice Chief of the Defence Staff; Air Vice-Marshal Edward Stringer; Jason Sugarman; His Honour Judge Peter Thornton, QC, Chief Coroner of England and Wales; and Robert Weir, QC. Finally, we wish to thank all serving and past officers of all three branches of the armed services who shared their experiences of ‘judicial creep’, most of whom do not wish to be identified. We are also hugely indebted to many Ministry of Defence civil servants, whose dedication and care give the lie to the fashionable idea that MOD ‘mandarins’ are invariably part of the problem. 6 | policyexchange.org.uk Foreword By the Rt Hon Lord Justice Moses None have succeeded in defeating the armed forces of the United Kingdom. Napoleon, Falkenhayn and Hitler could not. But where these enemies failed, our own legal institutions threaten to succeed. So argue the authors of this stimulating, well-reasoned and important paper. They recall that in 2009, soldiers carried twice the weight of the loads born by their predecessors during the Falklands. Now they demonstrate the even greater weight of judicial intervention imposed on the armed forces following the decision of the Supreme Court in June 2013 in the Smith case. The judges, by a majority of four to three, chose, in that case, to admit of the application of Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights to soldiers on the field of battle, should their death or injuries be attributable to some earlier decision relating to procurement. Only the dissenting speech of Lord Mance, with two lieutenants, escapes the authors’ barrage. It is piquant that, fearful of the consequences of that decision, the authors aim their not inconsiderable artillery at the judges. In my youth, the prisoner accused of felony need only to have stood in the dock wearing a regimental tie and a handful of campaign medals for the judge to halve the merited sentence and send him down with words of regretful praise. This paper sets out to demonstrate how what is described as ‘judicial creep’ (the authors have too much courtesy to add an ‘s’) threatens the ability of the armed forces to exercise that essence of professional military skill, the ability to act with flexibility and instinct within the framework of a superior commander’s intent.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • As a Child You Have No Way of Knowing How Fast Or Otherwise The
    A FOREIGN COUNTRY: GROWING UP IN RHODESIA Nigel Suckling Draft: © January 2021 1 I – MUNALI – 5 II – LIVINGSTONE – 43 III – PARALLEL LIVES – 126 IV – LUSAKA – 212 V – GOING HOME – 244 APPENDIX – 268 2 FOREWORD As a child you have no measure of how fast the world around you is changing. Because you’re developing so quickly yourself, you assume your environment is static and will carry on pretty much the same as you grow into it. This is true for everyone everywhere, naturally. Most old people can, if suitably primed, talk indefinitely about the changes they’ve seen in their lifetimes, even if they’ve never moved from the place where they were born; but some environments change more drastically than others, even without a war to spur things along. One such was Northern Rhodesia in southern Africa in the 1950s and 60s. As white kids growing up then we had no way of knowing, as our parents almost certainly did, just how fragile and transient our conditions were – how soon and how thoroughly the country would become Zambia, with a completely different social order and set of faces in command. The country of course is still there. In many ways its urban centres now look remarkably unchanged due to relative poverty. The houses we grew up in, many of the streets, landmark buildings and landscapes we were familiar with are still recognizably the same, much more so in fact than in many parts of Europe. What has vanished is the web of British colonial superstructure into which I and my siblings were born as privileged members, brief gentry on the cusp of a perfectly justified and largely peaceful revolution that was soon to brush us aside.
    [Show full text]
  • Armed Forces Bill 2021 Summary
    Headline can be Armedon three Forces lines Bill 2021 Title Summary Sub-title or short context to document Armed Forces Bill 2021 – Summary Background Since the Bill of Rights 1688, the legislation making the provision necessary for the Armed Forces to exist as a disciplined force has been subject to regular renewal by an Act of Parliament. The next renewal is needed by the end of 2021. The primary purpose of these Acts is to provide for the continuation for a further period of up to five years of the legislation enabling the Armed Forces to be recruited and maintained as disciplined bodies; that legislation is the Armed Forces Act 2006.The 2006 Act introduced a single system of law and the Service Justice System that applies to all Service personnel wherever in the world they are operating. The 2006 Act was implemented in 2009, replacing three separate Service Discipline Acts that dated back to the 1950s. The 2006 Act continues to serve our Armed Forces well and subsequent Armed Forces Acts have brought the 2006 Act up to date for the contemporary needs of the Services. In 2017, in preparation for this Bill, MOD commissioned an independent review of the Service Justice System (SJS) to ensure that it continues to be transparent, fair and efficient. The review made 79 recommendations for improvement and the Bill includes provision to implement a few of these which require primary legislation. In common with other five-yearly Bills, this one contains a small number of proposals which fall outside the ambit of Service discipline.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Britain, the Two World Wars and the Problem of Narrative
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE The Historical Journal provided by Apollo Great Br itain, the Two World Wars and the Problem of Narrative Journal: The Historical Journal Manuscript ID HJ-2016-005.R2 Manuscript Type: Article Period: 1900-99, 2000- Thematic: International Relations, Military, Cultural, Intellectual Geographic: Britain, Europe, Continental Cambridge University Press Page 1 of 60 The Historical Journal Britain, the Two World Wars and the Problem of Narrative BRITAIN, THE TWO WORLD WARS AND THE PROBLEM OF NARRATIVE: PUBLIC MEMORY, NATIONAL HISTORY AND EUROPEAN IDENTITY* David Reynolds Christ’s College, Cambridge So-called ‘memory booms’ have become a feature of public history, as well as providing golden opportunities for the heritage industry. Yet they also open up large and revealing issues for professional historians, shedding light on how societies conceptualize and understand their pasts.1 This article explores the way that British public discourse has grappled with the First and Second World Wars. At the heart of the British problem with these two defining conflicts of the twentieth century is an inability to construct a positive, teleological metanarrative of their overall ‘meaning’. By exploring this theme through historiography and memorialization, it is possible not merely to illuminate Britain’s self-understanding of its twentieth-century history, but also to shed light on the country’s contorted relationship with ‘Europe’, evident in party politics and public debate right down to the ‘Brexit’ referendum of 2016. The concept of mastering the past ( Vergangenheitsbewältigung ) originated in post-1945 West Germany as that country tried to address the horrendous legacies of Nazism.
    [Show full text]
  • Dan Jarvis Mp Summary of Initial Findings
    RECONNECTING LABOUR SUMMARY OF INITIAL FINDINGS DAN JARVIS MP KEY POINTS Labour has been in denial for too long about the challenges posed by UKIP. They cost Labour a lot of votes in constituencies we needed to win back from the Tories and they won a lot of votes in Labour heartland seats. There are no quick fixes for stemming the rise of UKIP, but we won’t achieve it by out-UKIPing UKIP or our-Torying the Tories, nor by lurching to the left to make ourselves feel better but do nothing for those who have lost faith in us. We need to revitalise local party engagement, recruit candidates from more representative backgrounds, and make it clear what we stand for as a Party and our policy response must include reassurance on issues like work and immigration, an economic plan to extend opportunity to communities that feel forgotten, a distinct message for older people, and reclaiming our mantle as a patriotic party. 1 INTRODUCTION The first step towards solving any problem is acknowledging that one exists in the first place. Frankly, the devastating nature of the General Election result has presented Labour with no shortage of challenges. Labour didn’t just lose an election on May 7th – we lost our connection with millions of people across the country. As we look to renew and rebuild, we know we need to win back votes from the Tories. But it is also clear they are not the only opponents we need to overcome across England and Wales. Labour needs to tackle UKIP too.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth Lawyers Association Amicus
    Nos. 15-1358, 15-1359, and 15-1363 In the Supreme Court of the United States JAMES W. ZIGLAR, Petitioner, v. AHMER IQBAL ABBASI, ET AL., Respondents. On Writs Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Second Circuit BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE COMMONWEALTH LAWYERS ASSOCIATION IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS GARY A. ISAAC Counsel of Record LOGAN A. STEINER JED W. GLICKSTEIN Mayer Brown LLP 71 S. Wacker Dr. Chicago, IL 60606 [email protected] (312) 782-0600 Counsel for Amicus Curiae (Additional Captions Listed on Inside Cover) JOHN D. ASHCROFT, ET AL., Petitioners, v. AHMER IQBAL ABBASI, ET AL., Respondents. DENNIS HASTY, ET AL., Petitioners, v. AHMER IQBAL ABBASI, ET AL., Respondents. i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES...................................... ii INTEREST OF THE AMICUS CURIAE...................1 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT...........................2 ARGUMENT ..............................................................4 I. The Court Should Consider The Prac- tices Of Other Western Democracies And The European Court Of Human Rights In Deciding Whether To Recog- nize A Bivens Remedy .....................................4 II. Barring Any Remedy In This Case Would Be At Odds With Foreign Deci- sions And Practice ...........................................8 A. Other Nations Provide Monetary Remedies For Human-Rights Abuses In Alleged Terrorism- Related Cases........................................9 B. The European Court Of Human Rights Likewise Provides Mone- tary Remedies For Human Rights Violations In Cases Implicating National Security................................15 C. Other Western Democracies And The European Court Of Human Rights Recognize Damages Ac- tions Even Where National Secu- rity Is Implicated ................................19 CONCLUSION .........................................................20 ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases Agiza v. Sweden, Commc’n No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Civilian Impact of Drone Strikes
    THE CIVILIAN IMPACT OF DRONES: UNEXAMINED COSTS, UNANSWERED QUESTIONS Acknowledgements This report is the product of a collaboration between the Human Rights Clinic at Columbia Law School and the Center for Civilians in Conflict. At the Columbia Human Rights Clinic, research and authorship includes: Naureen Shah, Acting Director of the Human Rights Clinic and Associate Director of the Counterterrorism and Human Rights Project, Human Rights Institute at Columbia Law School, Rashmi Chopra, J.D. ‘13, Janine Morna, J.D. ‘12, Chantal Grut, L.L.M. ‘12, Emily Howie, L.L.M. ‘12, Daniel Mule, J.D. ‘13, Zoe Hutchinson, L.L.M. ‘12, Max Abbott, J.D. ‘12. Sarah Holewinski, Executive Director of Center for Civilians in Conflict, led staff from the Center in conceptualization of the report, and additional research and writing, including with Golzar Kheiltash, Erin Osterhaus and Lara Berlin. The report was designed by Marla Keenan of Center for Civilians in Conflict. Liz Lucas of Center for Civilians in Conflict led media outreach with Greta Moseson, pro- gram coordinator at the Human Rights Institute at Columbia Law School. The Columbia Human Rights Clinic and the Columbia Human Rights Institute are grateful to the Open Society Foundations and Bullitt Foundation for their financial support of the Institute’s Counterterrorism and Human Rights Project, and to Columbia Law School for its ongoing support. Copyright © 2012 Center for Civilians in Conflict (formerly CIVIC) and Human Rights Clinic at Columbia Law School All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America. Copies of this report are available for download at: www.civiliansinconflict.org Cover: Shakeel Khan lost his home and members of his family to a drone missile in 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • This Copy of the Thesis Has Been Supplied on Condition That Anyone Who
    University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk 04 University of Plymouth Research Theses 01 Research Theses Main Collection 2014 The British Way of War in North West Europe 1944-45: A Study of Two Infantry Divisions Devine, Louis Paul http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/3014 Plymouth University All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and that no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without the author's prior consent. 1 THE BRITISH WAY OF WAR IN NORTH WEST EUROPE 1944-45: A STUDY OF TWO INFANTRY DIVISIONS By LOUIS PAUL DEVINE A thesis Submitted to Plymouth University in partial fulfilment for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Humanities May 2013 2 Louis Paul Devine The British Way of War in North West Europe 1944-45: A Study of two infantry divisions Abstract This thesis will examine the British way of war as experienced by two British Infantry Divisions - the 43rd ‘Wessex’ and 53rd ‘Welsh’ - during the Overlord campaign in North West Europe in 1944 and 1945. The main locus of research centres on the fighting components of those divisions; the infantry battalions and their supporting regiments.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Leavenworth Ethics Symposium
    Fort Leavenworth Ethics Symposium Ethical and Legal Issues in Contemporary Conflict Symposium Proceedings Frontier Conference Center Fort Leavenworth, Kansas November 16-18, 2009 Edited by Mark H. Wiggins and Ted Ihrke Co-sponsored by the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College and the Command and General Staff College Foundation, Inc. Special thanks to our key corporate sponsor Other supporting sponsors include: Published by the CGSC Foundation Press 100 Stimson Ave., Suite 1149 Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 66027 Copyright © 2010 by CGSC Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved. www.cgscfoundation.org Papers included in this symposium proceedings book were originally submitted by military officers and other subject matter experts to the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. The CGSC Foundation/CGSC Foundation Press makes no claim to the authors’ copyrights for their individual work. ISBN 978-0-615-36738-5 Layout and design by Mark H. Wiggins MHW Public Relations and Communications Printed in the United States of America by Allen Press, Lawrence, Kansas iv Contents Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................... ix Foreword by Brig. Gen. Ed Cardon, Deputy Commandant, CGSC & Col. (Ret.) Bob Ulin, CEO, CGSC Foundation ......................................................................... xi Symposium Participants ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Report
    YouGov / Election Data Survey Results Sample Size: 1096 Labour Party Members Fieldwork: 27th February - 3rd March 2017 EU Ref Vote 2015 Vote Age Gender Social Grade Region Membership Length Not Rest of Midlands / Pre Corbyn After Corbyn Total Remain Leave Lab 18-39 40-59 60+ Male Female ABC1 C2DE London North Scotland Lab South Wales leader leader Weighted Sample 1096 961 101 859 237 414 393 288 626 470 743 353 238 322 184 294 55 429 667 Unweighted Sample 1096 976 96 896 200 351 434 311 524 572 826 270 157 330 217 326 63 621 475 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % HEADLINE VOTING INTENTION: Westminster [Weighted by likelihood to vote, excluding those who would not vote or don't know] Con 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Lab 92 92 95 92 93 92 92 93 92 94 90 97 94 90 94 93 93 89 95 Lib Dem 5 6 1 6 3 5 5 6 7 3 7 2 5 8 4 4 4 9 3 UKIP 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Other 1 2 0 1 3 2 1 1 1 3 2 0 1 2 1 1 3 1 2 Other Parties Voting Intention [Weighted by likelihood to vote, excluding those who would not vote or don't know] SNP/ PCY 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 Green 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 1 0 2 2 0 1 2 1 1 0 1 1 BNP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Respect 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 © 2017 YouGov plc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Armed Forces Bill 7 DECEMBER 2005 Bill 94 of Session 2005-2006
    RESEARCH PAPER 05/86 The Armed Forces Bill 7 DECEMBER 2005 Bill 94 of Session 2005-2006 The Armed Forces Bill (Bill 94 of Session 2005-06) was presented on 30 November 2005. Second Reading is scheduled for 12 December 2005. The intention of the Bill is to consolidate and modernise the provisions of the three Service Discipline Acts: the Army Act 1955, the Air Force Act 1955 and the Naval Discipline Act 1957. These Acts will be repealed on the passage of this Bill into law. This paper should be read in conjunction with Library Research Paper RP05/75, Background to the Armed Forces Bill, 11 November 2005, which provides an outline of the current disciplinary system, some pre- legislative comments and sets out a number of issues that may be the subject of discussion as this Bill progresses. Claire Taylor INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS AND DEFENCE SECTION HOUSE OF COMMONS LIBRARY Recent Library Research Papers include: List of 15 most recent RPs 05/71 The EU Accession Bill [Bill 51 of 2005-06] 26.10.05 05/72 Afghanistan – The Culmination of the Bonn Process 26.10.05 05/73 The Council Tax (New Valuation Lists for England) Bill 01.11.05 [Bill 57 of 2005-06] 05/74 Economic Indicators, November 2005 01.11.05 05/75 Background to the Forthcoming Armed Forces Bill 11.11.05 05/76 Unemployment by Constituency, October 2005 16.11.05 05/77 Equality Bill [Bill 85 of 2005-06] 17.11.05 05/78 Northern Ireland (Offences) Bill [Bill 81 of 2005-06] 17.11.05 05/79 The Health Bill: Part I Smokefree premises, places and 22.11.05 vehicles [Bill 69 of 2005-06] 05/80 The
    [Show full text]
  • THE PRIMORDIAL ECONOMICS of CHEATING: Trading Skill for Glory Or Vital Steps to Evolved Play?
    THE PRIMORDIAL ECONOMICS OF CHEATING: Trading Skill for Glory or Vital Steps to Evolved Play? Robert MacBride Games Programs, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000 Australia (+61 3) 9925-2000 [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT firstly outline some of the ways in which ethics have been In a period marked by cultural, industrial and technological conceptualised in game play, following this; a look at a case convergences of new media platforms globally, what study of Melbourne MMO players and their definitions of constitutes ‘Situated play’? One of the key aspects of the the “ethics” in games through the rubric of cheating. global digital industries has been the increasing importance of locality in determining modes of game play. Far from The case study of MMO users in Melbourne will consist of homogenising game play, globalisation has resulted in users from over 10 ethnic backgrounds. The sample study “disjuncture” and “difference” at the level of the local. Take, will ask users about their definition of cheating and right or for example, the considerable successes of the Massively wrong game play so that we may mediate on some of Multiplayer Online scene; despite its movement towards the saliencies and nascent socio-cultural dimensions of play and idea of the connected gaming civilisation model, many locality. MMO are not global but, rather, played by certain communities that share linguistic, socio-cultural or political economy similarities. A considerably poignant example KEYWORDS would be the way in which different aesthetics appeal to Cheat, Debug, Trainer, Twinking, Build & Levelling guides, cultural contexts. The formulation of these distinctive taste Camping, Programming flaw exploitation, Walkthrough, cultures are marked by what Pierre Bourdieu noted as FAQ (Frequently asked question document), Patching, modes of cultural (productions of knowledges), social and Speed run, Gold/Stat farming, Ghosting, Unlockable, Easter economic capital.
    [Show full text]
  • British Imperialism in Books from the “Third Reich”
    Empire and National Character: British Imperialism in Books from the “Third Reich” Victoria Jane Stiles, MA, MA Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2015 Abstract This thesis examines the variety of representations and rhetorical deployments of the theme of British Imperialism within books published in the “Third Reich”. The thesis considers these books not only as vehicles for particular ideas and arguments but also as consumer objects and therefore as the product of a series of compromises between the needs of a host of actors, both official and commercial. It further traces the origins of the component parts of these texts via the history of reuse of images and extracts and by identifying earlier examples of particular tropes of “Englishness” and the British Empire. British imperial history was a rich source of material for National Socialist writers and educators to draw on and lent itself to a wide variety of arguments. Britain could be, in turns, a symbol of “Nordic” strength, a civilisation in decline, a natural ally and protector of Germany, or a weak, corrupt, outdated entity, controlled by Germany’s supposed enemies. Drawing on a long tradition of comparing European colonial records, the British Empire was also used as a benchmark for Germany’s former imperial achievements, particularly in moral arguments regarding the treatment of indigenous populations. Through its focus on books, which were less ephemeral than media such as newspaper and magazine articles, radio broadcasts or newsreels, the thesis demonstrates how newer writings sought to recontextualise older material in the light of changing circumstances.
    [Show full text]