DOCSLIB.ORG

The Plo T of the Game a Bit of Histor Y Wha T

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Seminaryjna Tourist game, the starting card of which you are św. Jana holding in your hand, is a special variety of city Wzgórze Lecha Kilińskiego games (otherwise known as urban games). This pl. new form of sightseeing allows you to play almost św. Wojciecha 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Participants Łaskiego św. Wojciecha in the game move around the streets and alleys of Gniezno to solve the puzzles prepared for them. Franciszkańska WHAT’S THIS WHAT’S You can play individually or in teams. Anyone who GAME ABOUT? Grzybowo discovers the password can enter their name on the Rynek Trasa Zjazdu Gnieźnieńskiego Dąbrówki winners list available on the Internet and download Rynek a personal certificate. (Marktet square) Jeziorna Bolesława Chrobrego Gniezno – the first capital of Poland – which lies in Farna św. Wawrzyńca the heart of the Piast Route is one of the most im- Słomianka Łubieńskiego portant cities for the history of Poland. Along with lake Jelonek Rzeźnicka the nearby towns – Ostrów Lednicki, Grzybowo Warszawska Giecz and Poznań – formed the foundations for the Ks. Prymasa power of the Piast Country, the sign of which was A BIT the emergence of the Polish statehood, the baptism Moniuszki Zaułek św. Wawrzyńca OF HISTORY and the organization of church structures in the young duchy. In all these events Gniezno played a key role – this is where Mieszko I built a monument- Mieszka I Adama Mickiewicza o g e i k s w e z r t s o K a f e z ó J . f o r al palace, where the first Polish archbishopric was P pl.21 Stycznia established and the Congres of Gniezno – one of the most important events in the history of Poland as well as that part of medieval Europe – took place. In 1025 the first Polish king – the son of Mieszko I and Dobrawa – Bolesław Chrobry was crowned in the Cathedral in Gniezno. Later it hosted the coro- nations of four more Polish rulers – Mieszko II, Bo- lesław Śmiały, Przemysł II and Wacław II. For more information about Gniezno visit the websites: www.gniezno.eu and www.tupowstalapolska.pl. Royal traditions of Gniezno are not just the bare facts recorded by chroniclers. Important person- alities have the power to influence people and places regardless of the times. Five royal coronation are important elements of the city’s heritage. We Dear Adventurer! There are some places marked on the map of can say that the kings crowned in Gniezno are given Gniezno, the places which I and the other kings crowned in this city, the seats of honour not only in the history of the as well as our wives, liked very much. Set your route (the order does THE PLOT city, but also in the present. And if so, they probably not matter) and locate them following the instructions of the kings. OF THE GAME can have their favorite sites in Gniezno even today. Look around carefully in each of these places and find the object visible on the photograph or described in the hint. The crown next You will follow the footsteps of the kings crowned to the hint or the photo belongs to the person who took a liking in Gniezno in order to discover the mysterious to that particular place (note the difficulty: there are 10 kings but password. You will be able to do it by getting to 11 crowns to choose from). know the owners of the crowns, whom you can see at the back of this card. When you manage to find The letters in the stones in the crowns of the kings and their wives, the password you can visit www.gryturystyczne.pl arranged according to the dates of the coronation, will form the se- cret password – the confirmation of solving the task. and add your name to the winners list and download GOOD LUCK! a personal certificate. WHERE TO FIND In Gniezno I like the most the place where the street named after me crosses Łubień- Above the entrance to the stately Gothic skiego Street. building which dates back to 1243, you My wife Oda prefers the church of St. George will see a cross with two beams of which located next to the Cathedral, probably be- the top one will be shorter. cause there used to be our palace. Bolesław Chrobry crowned in 1025 There you will find men with stern looks, I, like Oda – whom my father married after one of whom looks ready to fight, and the death of my mother Emnilda – like the another is holding in his left hand a sym- places around the Cathedral. bol of royal power and rising his right Rycheza, my wife, likes the views from the courtyard of the building in Kostrzewskiego hand in a gesture of taking an oath. Street. Mieszko II Lambert crowned in 1025 Secret password On a side wall of the temple you will find I truly like the market square in Gniezno. Stroll- a sonorous metal. If you see upon him ing there, I would tread carefully and admire Enter below the letters from the stones in the name and image of Blessed Bogumił, the pavement. the crowns in a chronological order (accord- know that it used to be a lot higher, along- My wife prefers the facade of the Cathedral, ing to the dates of the coronations) from the probably because it hosted all of the Gniezno oldest pair (king and king’s wife) to the one side the four similar to the one you find. game Tourist coronations. nearest to the contemporary times. Bolesław Śmiały crowned in 1076 KING KING’S WIFE What I love here is the atmosphere of the mon- KING KING’S WIFE astery and the Church in św. Jana Street, both of which were generously supported by my father KING KING’S WIFE On the building you will see an image of Przemysł I and my uncle Bolesław Pobożny. two spears. One of them is a copy of the My wife prefers a church founded by my uncle KING KING’S WIFE spear of St. Maurice, given to the Duke and supported by me. It is situated in Francisz- kańska Street. Bolesław during the Congress of Gniezno, KING KING’S WIFE GNIEZNO – THE CITY OF KINGS and the other is defeating a dragon. Przemysł II crowned in 1295 The correct letters will form a secret pass- word which confirms the solving of the task. The most precious to me in Gniezno is the 9+ 90’ magnificent building in Farna Street. However, my wife, Rycheza Elżbieta (the daughter of AGE TIME Przemysł II) likes the church in św. Wawrzyńca At the entrance to the building at the back Street, which, once wooden, was reconstruc- of the church search for words in Latin ted after the fire in the 15th century as a brick which say: ”Providence errected. Let Mer- building. cy protect”. Know that the first and the last Wacław II word both start with PRO also in Latin. crowned in 1300 AUTHORS: Szymon Dąbrowski, Jarosław Redliński GRAPHIC: Szymon Pilecki TECHNICAL PROOFREADER: Cała Jaskrawość CARTOGRAPHY: OpenStreetMap contributors TRANSLATION: Anna Adanowicz TRANSLATION: contributors OpenStreetMap CARTOGRAPHY: Jaskrawość Cała GRAPHIC: Szymon Pilecki TECHNICAL PROOFREADER: Redliński Jarosław AUTHORS: Szymon Dąbrowski,.
Recommended publications
  • 30 Tadeusz Wasilewski Brata Przybysława, Księcia Stodoran4

    30 Tadeusz Wasilewski Brata Przybysława, Księcia Stodoran4

    TADEUSZ WASILEWSKI (Warszawa) POCHODZENIE EMNILDY, TRZECIEJ ŻONY BOLESŁAWA CHROBREGO A GENEZA POLSKIEGO WŁADZTWA NAD MORAWAMI Do spornych, dotąd nie rozwiązanych zagadnień z wczesnych dziejów dynastii piastowskiej należy pochodzenie Emnildy — długoletniej mał­ żonki Bolesława Chrobrego, matki Mieszka II. O Emnildzie mamy jedynie unikalny przekaz współczesnego jej kronikarza saskiego, biskupa merse- burskiego Thietmara: tertia (uxor Bolizlavi) fuit Emnildis, edita a vene­ rabili seniore Dobremiro1. Dowiadujemy się z tych słów, jak to wykazał w 1895 r. Oswald Bal­ zer, że ojciec, określony mianem venerabilis senior, był chrześcijańskim księciem, a jego słowiańskie imię sytuuje jego księstwo na Słowiańszczyź- nie. Wymienienie go wyłącznie z imienia, bez podania bliższych określeń, zwłaszcza geograficznych, wskazuje, że był on postacią znaną dobrze ko­ mesom i duchownym saskim jako adresatom kroniki Thiettmara. Na związ­ ki Dobromira, może nawet pokrewieństwo z arystokracją niemiecką, wska­ zuje niemieckie imię córki Emmildis, a być może również imię wnuczki Regelindis. Księstwo Dobromira położone było ponadto również w pobliżu granic państwa Mieszka I, gdyż kolejne małżeństwa zawierane przez Bole­ sława Chrobrego za życia ojca miały wybitnie polityczny charakter2. Na podstawie powyższych wskazówek poszukiwano ojczyzny Dobro­ mira w jednym z księstw słowiańskich, znajdujących się w zasięgu wpły­ wów niemieckich, którego chrześcijańscy władcy znani byli dobrze Sa­ som. Umiejscawiano zatem księcia Dobromira przede wszystkim na Połabiu. Oswald Balzer uważał, że był on księciem jakiegoś ludu w Słowiańszczyź- nie północno-zachodniej i zwracał uwagę na występowanie już w X w. wśród Obodrzyców chrześcijańskich książąts. Stanisław Zakrzewski wi­ dział w nim ostatniego księcia Milczan, czyli południowych Łużyczan lub 1 Kronika Thietmara. Z tekstu łacińskiego przetłumaczył, wstępem poprzedził i k o m en ta rzami opatrzył M.
  • The Piast Horseman)

    The Piast Horseman)

    Coins issued in 2006 Coins issued in 2006 National Bank of Poland Below the eagle, on the right, an inscription: 10 Z¸, on the left, images of two spearheads on poles. Under the Eagle’s left leg, m the mint’s mark –– w . CoinsCoins Reverse: In the centre, a stylised image of an armoured mounted sergeant with a bared sword. In the background, the shadow of an armoured mounted sergeant holding a spear. On the top right, a diagonal inscription: JEèDZIEC PIASTOWSKI face value 200 z∏ (the Piast Horseman). The Piast Horseman metal 900/1000Au finish proof – History of the Polish Cavalry – diameter 27.00 mm weight 15.50 g mintage 10,000 pcs Obverse: On the left, an image of the Eagle established as the state Emblem of the Republic of Poland. On the right, an image of Szczerbiec (lit. notched sword), the sword that was traditionally used in the coronation ceremony of Polish kings. In the background, a motive from the sword’s hilt. On the right, face value 2 z∏ the notation of the year of issue: 2006. On the top right, a semicircular inscription: RZECZPOSPOLITA POLSKA (the metal CuAl5Zn5Sn1 alloy Republic of Poland). At the bottom, an inscription: 200 Z¸. finish standard m Under the Eagle’s left leg, the mint’s mark:––w . diameter 27.00 mm Reverse: In the centre, a stylised image of an armoured weight 8.15 g mounted sergeant with a bared sword. In the background, the mintage 1,000,000 pcs sergeant’s shadow. On the left, a semicircular inscription: JEèDZIEC PIASTOWSKI (the Piast Horseman).
  • Pedigree of the Wilson Family N O P

    Pedigree of the Wilson Family N O P

    Pedigree of the Wilson Family N O P Namur** . NOP-1 Pegonitissa . NOP-203 Namur** . NOP-6 Pelaez** . NOP-205 Nantes** . NOP-10 Pembridge . NOP-208 Naples** . NOP-13 Peninton . NOP-210 Naples*** . NOP-16 Penthievre**. NOP-212 Narbonne** . NOP-27 Peplesham . NOP-217 Navarre*** . NOP-30 Perche** . NOP-220 Navarre*** . NOP-40 Percy** . NOP-224 Neuchatel** . NOP-51 Percy** . NOP-236 Neufmarche** . NOP-55 Periton . NOP-244 Nevers**. NOP-66 Pershale . NOP-246 Nevil . NOP-68 Pettendorf* . NOP-248 Neville** . NOP-70 Peverel . NOP-251 Neville** . NOP-78 Peverel . NOP-253 Noel* . NOP-84 Peverel . NOP-255 Nordmark . NOP-89 Pichard . NOP-257 Normandy** . NOP-92 Picot . NOP-259 Northeim**. NOP-96 Picquigny . NOP-261 Northumberland/Northumbria** . NOP-100 Pierrepont . NOP-263 Norton . NOP-103 Pigot . NOP-266 Norwood** . NOP-105 Plaiz . NOP-268 Nottingham . NOP-112 Plantagenet*** . NOP-270 Noyers** . NOP-114 Plantagenet** . NOP-288 Nullenburg . NOP-117 Plessis . NOP-295 Nunwicke . NOP-119 Poland*** . NOP-297 Olafsdotter*** . NOP-121 Pole*** . NOP-356 Olofsdottir*** . NOP-142 Pollington . NOP-360 O’Neill*** . NOP-148 Polotsk** . NOP-363 Orleans*** . NOP-153 Ponthieu . NOP-366 Orreby . NOP-157 Porhoet** . NOP-368 Osborn . NOP-160 Port . NOP-372 Ostmark** . NOP-163 Port* . NOP-374 O’Toole*** . NOP-166 Portugal*** . NOP-376 Ovequiz . NOP-173 Poynings . NOP-387 Oviedo* . NOP-175 Prendergast** . NOP-390 Oxton . NOP-178 Prescott . NOP-394 Pamplona . NOP-180 Preuilly . NOP-396 Pantolph . NOP-183 Provence*** . NOP-398 Paris*** . NOP-185 Provence** . NOP-400 Paris** . NOP-187 Provence** . NOP-406 Pateshull . NOP-189 Purefoy/Purifoy . NOP-410 Paunton . NOP-191 Pusterthal .
  • CONCLUSION This Study Has Concentrated on the Image Of

    CONCLUSION This Study Has Concentrated on the Image Of

    CONCLUSION This study has concentrated on the image of Poland and its rulers which was created by German sources in the earliest period of the existence of the Piast state (963–1034). One of the prime goals of this work was to identify the cultural and political context of such remarks and opinions. Another important target set by the author of this book was to attain information which illustrated actions taken by Mieszko I, Boleslav Chrobry, and Mieszko II, who aimed to create a certain image of themselves in Germany—their most significant political partner. The very first reference in sources pertaining to the Polish rulers and their country comes from around 963, so it is only three years older than the bap- tism of Poland. Its author, Widukind of Corvey, called Mieszko I’s subjects ‘barbarians’, and he applied the same term to other Slavic tribes who inhab- ited the region. Another text, whose origin dates back to the pagan period in the history of Poland—known as the Account by Ibrahim ibn Yacub addressed the Piast ruler as the king of the North. These two expressions bear a close resemblance and come from an old, ancient way of perceiving the geography of hardly explored areas of the Continent, which were termed the ‘northern’. In the Western Europe of the earlier Middle Ages this was the way intellec- tuals indicated in their texts an external, as though outside the Continent and civilization, location of not only Scandinavia, but also Slavic countries. This was practised irrespective of their real location in relation to the observer.
  • The Realm of Mieszko I. Contribution to the Study

    The Realm of Mieszko I. Contribution to the Study

    Historia Slavorum Occidentis 2016, nr 2(11) ISSN 2084–1213 DOI: 10.15804/hso160201 MARCIN DANIELEWSKI (POZNAŃ) TTHEHE RREALMEALM OOFF MMIESZKOIESZKO II.. CCONTRIBUTIONONTRIBUTION TTOO TTHEHE SSTUDYTUDY OONN FFORTIFIEDORTIFIED SSETTLEMENTS*ETTLEMENTS* Słowa kluczowe: grody, władztwo Mieszka I, Gniezno, Grzybowo, Poznań Keywords: strongholds, the realm of Mieszko I, Gniezno, Grzybowo, Poznań Abstract: The paper discusses the organisation of the realm of Mieszko I based on a network of strongholds. It seeks to examine the functions of fortifi ed settlements and Mieszko’s engagement in the construction of strongholds. IIntroductionntroduction 2016 marks the 1050th anniversary of the baptism of Mieszko I. A fasci- nating research subject, there is no much we actually know of the fi rst his- torical Polish ruler from the Piast dynasty, even though several books have sought to explore the issue1. There has been an ongoing debate on the origins of Christianity, the establishment of the Church on Polish soil or the oldest A research project funded under the 2014–2019 programme of the Minister of Science and Higher Education (‘The National Programme for the Development of Humanities’), project no. 0040/NPRH3/H11/82/2014. 1 J. Strzelczyk, Mieszko Pierwszy, 2nd edition, Poznań 1999; G. Labuda, Mieszko I, Wro- cław 2002; P. Urbańczyk, Mieszko Pierwszy Tajemniczy, Toruń 2012. It must be empha- sised that the latter book is marked by several weaknesses, as D.A. Sikorski has convinc- ingly demonstrated, Mieszko Pierwszy Tajemniczy i jeszcze bardziej tajemnicza metoda hi- storiografi czna, Roczniki Historyczne 79 (2013), pp 183–203; idem, Mieszko I mniej już tajemniczy (odpowiedź Przemysławowi Urbańczykowi), Roczniki Historyczne 80 (2014), pp 279–288.
  • Polska Pierwszych Piastów Pradzieje Ziem Polskich

    Polska Pierwszych Piastów Pradzieje Ziem Polskich

    POLSKA PIERWSZYCH PIASTÓW PRADZIEJE ZIEM POLSKICH Przez wieki na ziemiach polskich mieszkało wiele plemion, których nazw nie znamy. Dlatego na podstawie pozostałości po nich określamy ludy te jako kultury archeologiczne. PRADZIEJE ZIEM POLSKICH Przykłady kultur archeologicznych: -kultura ceramiki sznurowej -kultura grobów kloszowych -kultura naczyń lejkowatych -kultura przeworska. PRADZIEJE ZIEM POLSKICH PRADZIEJE ZIEM POLSKICH Na ziemiach polskich zachowały się m.in.: -kurhany (ziemne kopce przykrywające groby) -kamienne kręgi (prawdopodobnie pełniły funkcje religijne) PRADZIEJE ZIEM POLSKICH Najbardziej znaną osadą kultury łużyckiej na ziemiach polskich (VIII – VII w. p.n.e.) jest Biskupin. To osada położona na wyspie jeziora składająca się z 13 podłużnych domów. Jej mieszkańcy (ok. 800) byli rolnikami i myśliwymi. PRADZIEJE ZIEM POLSKICH PRADZIEJE ZIEM POLSKICH W starożytności mieszkańcy ziem polskich utrzymywali kontakty z Grekami i Rzymianami (np. szlak bursztynowy). W Górach Świętokrzyskich bogatych w złoża żelaza rozwinęło się hutnictwo (dymarki). PLEMIONA POLSKIE W VI w. na ziemiach polskich pojawili się Słowianie. Grupa rodzin pochodząca od wspólnego przodka tworzyła u nich ród. Rody łączyły się we wspólnoty sąsiedzkie - opola, a te tworzyły plemiona. Najsilniejsze plemiona podbijały sąsiednie – słabsze i tworzyły pierwsze państewka plemienne. Władzą w plemionach był wiec (wszyscy dorośli mężczyźni), a na czas wojny wybierano wodza (księcia), który niekiedy zdołał utrzymać swoją władzę na czasy pokoju. PLEMIONA POLSKIE W IX w. ziemie dzisiejszej Polski zamieszkiwało kilka plemion: -Polanie (w Wielkopolsce) -Wiślanie (w Małopolsce) -Mazowszanie (na Mazowszu) -Kujawianie (na Kujawach) -Pomorzanie (na Pomorzu) -Lędzianie (na Lubelszczyźnie) -plemiona śląskie np. Ślężanie, Opolanie, Dziadoszanie, Bobrzanie (na Śląsku) POWSTANIE POLSKI Polanie podbili sąsiednie plemiona (Kujawian, Mazowszan itd.) i stworzyli państwo o nazwie Polska.
  • Nasze Polskie Początki (Według Jerzego Gruszki)

    Nasze Polskie Początki (Według Jerzego Gruszki)

    Nasze polskie początki (według Jerzego Gruszki) WYBRANE PROBLEMY Jelenia Góra 2019 Autor: JERZY GRUSZKA: R. 1, 2, 3, 4.1, Zakończenie Redakcja: ROMUALD WITCZAK: Wstęp, R 4.2 SPIS TREŚCI WSTĘP ................................................................................................... 4 ROZDZIAŁ 1. O ważniejszych elementach naszego życia społecznego ........... 6 1.1. Słowiańskie korzenie .............................................................................. 6 1.2. Istotne (wybrane) terminy ważne do rozumienia ówczesnych warunków życia ........................................................................................................ 9 ROZDZIAŁ 2. O naszych państwowych początkach....................................... 13 2.1. Początki państwowości i piastowskiej dynastii ..................................... 13 2.2. Organizacja władzy w początkach naszej państwowości ...................... 18 2.3. O roku 1000 i 1025 inaczej ................................................................... 22 ROZDZIAŁ 3. Wierzenia naszych przodków .................................................. 26 3.1. Wierzenia Słowian ................................................................................ 26 3.2. Chrystianizacja ziem polskich .............................................................. 32 3.3. Nasi święci patroni ............................................................................... 42 Św. Wojciech ......................................................................................... 42 Św. Stanisław ze
  • Philip Earl Steele Homo Religiosus

    Philip Earl Steele Homo Religiosus

    Philip Earl Steele Homo religiosus : the phenomenon of Poland’s Mieszko I The full significance of Mieszko I’s decision to adopt Christianity in 966 has generally evaded Polish historiography. This is understandable regarding recent generations of Polish scholars, as the dogmas imposed during the country’s communist period had the effect of preserving the rationalist skepticism which Jacob Burckhardt, for instance, had applied in the mid-19 th c. toward understanding the conversion of Constantine the Great 1. That reductionist approach, often labeled “scientism” in Poland, dismisses the etiological power of religious beliefs and motives in history’s dynamics – and it was by and large rejected in Western scholarship roughly a century ago. 2 Yet as the medieval historian Richard Fletcher observed already a decade into the post-Cold War era, “This line of argument has held some appeal for historians of a Marxist inclination, of whom a few may still be encountered in remote places” 3. Polish historians might chuckle upon reading that – or cringe, as the case may be. For the shoe certainly fits. The structural realities of the Soviet bloc of course compounded this problem, inasmuch as they fostered the virtual autarky of national scholarly communities. Thus, until the demise of communism, Polish historians were importantly cut off from the community of Western scholars. Their ensuing lack of skill with Western languages only deepened the 1 J. Burckhardt, Die Zeit Constantins des Grossen, Basel 1853. 2 Cf. C. Odahl, Constantine and the Christian Empire, London, New York 2013, p. 285-286. 3 Richard Fletcher, The Barbarian Conversion: From Paganism to Christianity , University of California Press, 1999, p.
  • The Catholic Church in Polish History, Palgrave Studies in Religion, Politics, and Policy, DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-40281-3 272 APPENDIX – TIMELINE, 966–2016

    The Catholic Church in Polish History, Palgrave Studies in Religion, Politics, and Policy, DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-40281-3 272 APPENDIX – TIMELINE, 966–2016

    APPENDIX – TIMELINE, 966–2016 966: Duke Mieszko’s conversion to Christianity 997: Beheading of Bishop Adalbert of Prague (known in Poland as Wojciech) 1022: Revolt against the Piast dynasty, with pagan participation 1066: Revolt by pagans 1140: Arrival of the Cistercian Order in Poland 1215: The Fourth Lateran Council, which made annual confession and communion mandatory for all Christians 1241: Invasion of Eastern Europe, including Poland, by a Tatar (Muslim) army 1337–1341: Renewed war with the Tatars 1386: Founding, through marriage, of the Jagiellonian dynasty 1378–1417: The Great Schism, with rival popes sitting in Avignon and Rome and, beginning in 1409, with a third pope residing in Pisa 1454–1466: The Thirteen Years’ War 1520: The Edict of Thorn (Toruń), by which the King of Poland banned the importation of Martin Luther’swritings into Poland 1529: The first siege of Vienna by Ottoman forces 1551–1553: New Testament published in Polish 1563: First translation of the entire Bible into Polish 1564: Arrival of the Jesuit Order in Poland © The Author(s) 2017 271 S.P. Ramet, The Catholic Church in Polish History, Palgrave Studies in Religion, Politics, and Policy, DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-40281-3 272 APPENDIX – TIMELINE, 966–2016 1569: The Union of Lublin, merging the Kingdom of Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania into a single, federated Commonwealth 1577–1578: Lutherans granted freedom of worship in Poland 1596: The Union of Brest, bring a large number of Orthodox parishes into union with Rome as Eastern-Rite Catholics 1655–1660:
  • A Polish Ethno-Religion? Some Thoughts on the Baptism of Poland and Contemporary National Identity

    A Polish Ethno-Religion? Some Thoughts on the Baptism of Poland and Contemporary National Identity

    Zoon Politikon 8/2017 DOI: 10.4467/2543408XZOP.17.006.9264 A POLISH ETHNO-RELIGION? SOME THOUGHTS ON THE BAPTISM OF POLAND AND CONTEMPORARY NATIONAL IDENTITY * Rafał Pankowski Abstract The aim of the paper is to look at the baptism of Poland as a one of the ele- ments used to built Polish national identity. The foucus is on the Piast era in Polish history and the role which baptism played in incorporating Poles into latin civilistation. The articles also discusses the modern references to impor- tance of 10th and 11th century events in building 21st century of the national identity discourse. Keywords: Identity, nation, religion, baptism, civilization * Dr hab. Rafał Pankowski, prof. CC Collegium Civitas, Collegium Civitas, [email protected] 127 A Polish ethno-religion? Some thoughts on the baptism of Poland and contemporary national identity The baptism of Poland in 966 is commonly seen as the symbolic begin- ning of the Polish state and Polish history. Many facts around the bap- tism of Prince Mieszko’s state are unclear today, but its significance as the symbolic beginning of Polish statehood remains unquestioned. The facts, however, do not need to concern us too much here. It has become a cornerstone of what was to become known as Polish identity and has determined several important aspects of its formation well into the pre- sent day. Much energy has been invested – in terms of Polish historical schol- arship and political writings – in the idea of Poland’s belonging to “Latin civilization”. Historically speaking, the claim cannot be taken lit- erally if “Latin civilization” means the lands which had been conquered, or directly influenced, by the culture of the Roman Empire.

  • Part I Poland, to 1795

    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-42436-3 — A Concise History of Poland Jerzy Lukowski , Hubert Zawadzki Excerpt More Information PART I POLAND, TO 1795 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-42436-3 — A Concise History of Poland Jerzy Lukowski , Hubert Zawadzki Excerpt More Information © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-42436-3 — A Concise History of Poland Jerzy Lukowski , Hubert Zawadzki Excerpt More Information 1 Piast Poland, ?–1385 The Romans never conquered Poland: a source of pride to its first native chronicler, bishop Vincent of Kraków, writ- ing around 1200, but a nuisance to the modern historian. Since Rome neither subjugated nor abandoned Poland, there is no widely recognisable Year One from which to launch a historical survey. The year ad 966 has to serve, for in that year the ruler of what has come to be known as ‘Poland’ accepted (and imposed) Latin Christianity. We know as little about this event as we do about anything else that happened during the next hundred years or so. The written record begins to assume substantial propor- tions only in the fourteenth century. Some eighty years before bishop Vincent, an unknown clergyman, possibly of French origin (he has come to be called Gall-Anonim, ‘the anonymous Gaul’) produced the earliest chronicle emanating directly from the Polish lands. Archaeological and toponymic evidence, the accounts of foreign observ- ers and travellers, inform the historian little better than the folk memory on which Gall relied to locate the founder of the ruling house in a successful peasant adventurer called ‘Piast’,1 who had overthrown a tyran- nical predecessor, Popiel (supposedly gnawed to death by 1 The label ‘Piast’ was attributed to the ruling dynasty only in the late seventeenth century by Silesian antiquarians.
  • THE DYNASTIC HORIZONS of the Arpads and PIASTS, Ca

    THE DYNASTIC HORIZONS of the Arpads and PIASTS, Ca

    THE DYNASTIC HORIZONS OF THE ARPADs AND PIASTS, ca. 1150-1250 Wojciech Kozlowski This comparative study aims to present, in brief, an interesting parallel development of marriage "policy" in Hungary and Poland in the High Middle Ages. Both states emerged on the European political map in the second half of the tenth century, linking the Ruthenian East and the Balkans with Western Europe. After nearly two centuries of mutual political and military cooperation that rested on a number of dynastic marriages, these states drifted apart during the second half of the twelfth century. Whereas Hungary was rising in power, Poland pulled back to more local politics. l This did not happen either automatically or rapidly, however, but was a gradual process which I will illustrate below from the marital point of view. Although the period selected, 1150-1250, seems somewhat artificial, it is meant to be so. The last interdynastic marriage took place around 1140 and in the meantime the last "universal" duke of Poland, Boleslaw the Wrymouth, died in 1138. No more Arpad­ Piast marriages were concluded until that of Salome a and Coloman in 1214.2 I would call these several decades, nevertheless, a "new opening." They completely reshaped Hungarian-Polish relations to such an extent that their further development in the middle of the thirteenth century linked the history of Hungary and Poland for the next couple of centuries.3 The marriage of 1214 was a precedent for those of 1239 and 1256;4 therefore, I decided to establish a final date for my discussion around 1250, examining this almost-hundred-year-long period of marital links.