Advaita Vedanta and Marcus Borg: Opportunities for Hindu- Christian Dialogue
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Journal of Hindu-Christian Studies Volume 16 Article 8 January 2003 Advaita Vedanta and Marcus Borg: Opportunities for Hindu- Christian Dialogue Anantanand Rambachan Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.butler.edu/jhcs Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Rambachan, Anantanand (2003) "Advaita Vedanta and Marcus Borg: Opportunities for Hindu-Christian Dialogue," Journal of Hindu-Christian Studies: Vol. 16, Article 8. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7825/2164-6279.1297 The Journal of Hindu-Christian Studies is a publication of the Society for Hindu-Christian Studies. The digital version is made available by Digital Commons @ Butler University. For questions about the Journal or the Society, please contact [email protected]. For more information about Digital Commons @ Butler University, please contact [email protected]. - Rambachan: Advaita Vedanta and Marcus Borg: Opportunities for Hindu-Christian Dialogue Advaita Vedanta and Marcus Borg: Opportunities for Hindu-Christian Dialogue Anantanand Rambachan Saint Olaf College DIALOGUE between Hindus and doctrine of God. l According to Borg, one of Christians in recent times appears to be the "root concepts" of God, present both in dominated by the controversies concerning the Bible and in the wider Christian proselytizing and conversion. While these tradition, envisages the divine as a are important issues and ought not to be "supernatural being "out there," separate overlooked in Hindu-Christian interactions, from the world, who created the world a we ignore, to our mutual deprivation, the long time ago and who may from time to wealth of insight about the nature of God time intervene within it.,,2 This and the meaning of being religious that are "supernatural theism," as Borg terms it, is the fruits of reflection, practice and deeply anthropomorphic in its conception of experience in our traditions. Our exploration God. As a person, God was separate from of these issues reveal shared convictions, :j the world. Omnipresence meant that God, challenging questions for each other and the from the spatial remoteness of the heavens, recognition that religious growth does not knew everything or could choose to be in occur only through encounters within the any place. The presence of God in the world boundaries of one's own religious world. was not continuous. Borg connects While the Christian scholar, Marcus Borg, supernatural theism with the predominant rarely refers to Hinduism in his writings, his influence of what he refers to as the interpretations of Christianity suggest "monarchical model of God.,,3 In addition to exciting possibilities for dialogue between being patriarchcal, this model also both traditions. This article is an attempt to emphasizes the distance, in terms of space identify, from an Advaita perspective, some and power, of God from the world. It of the potential issues for dialogue arising prioritizes the role of God as judge and from Borg's work and a few questions that lawgiver and the religious life as consisting may be meaningfully raised and pursued. I in essentially meeting. the requirements of am a listener to Borg's "Christian this remote God. conversation" and offer these thoughts as an The supernatural theism that informed initial response. Borg's childhood image of God seemed In his well-know book, The God We inadequate as Borg encountered an Never Know, historian of religion Marcus enlightenment view that emphasized the Borg undertakes a critical assessment of reality of matter, natural laws, and the certain central features of the Christian enormity of the universe. "The bigger the Anantanand Rambachan teaches religion and philosophy at Saint Olaf College in Northfield, Minnesota, U.S.A. His scholarly interests include Advaita Vedanta, interreligious dialogue and Hinduism in the modern: era. Among his books are The Limits of Scripture: Vivekananda's Reinterpretation of the Vedas (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1994) and Accomplishing the Accomplished: The Vedas as a Source of Valid Knowledge in Samkara (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1991). He is presently working on a contemporary reconstruction of Advaita. Hindu-Christian Studies Bulletin 16 (2003) 30-37 Published by Digital Commons @ Butler University, 2003 1 -- • Journal of Hindu-Christian Studies, Vol. 16 [2003], Art. 8 Advaita Vedanta and Marcus Borg 31 UnIverse got, the· farther away God Even there your hand shall lead me, seemed." The gap between a remote God And your right hand shall hold me and no God appeared insignificant. At the fast.4 same time, Borg discovered that other Christian thinkers were wrestling with the In Acts (17. 27-28),· we have Paul's inadequacies of supernatural theism. John emphasis on the immediacy of God and his Robinson rejected the view of God "out Tillich-like description, " They would search there" and argued for the encounter with the for God and perhaps grope for God and find divine in the depths of the human being. God - though indeed God is not far from Paul Tillich spoke of God as " the ground of each one of us. For 'In God we live and being" or "ultimate reality" and sought to move and have our being.' " differentiate the nature of God's existence Borg's panentheisitic way of thinking from objects in the world. about God, acknowledging both immanence As an alternative to the intellectual and and transcendence, is heartily endorsed in other difficulties presented by supernatural . the Advaita view of the nature of brahman. theism, Borg recovers what he believes to an The universe is consistently described as alternative model of God, present both in the existing in brahman even as brahman exists Bible and Christian tradition, but unfamiliar equqlly in everything. Taittiriya Upanisad to most Christians. He refers to this way of (II.7.1) describes the bringing forth of the thinking about the divine as panentheism, a world from brahman and the latter's entry model that understands God to be an all into everything created. pervasive reality in which all things exist. It emphasizes God to be both immanent and "He desired~ Let me become many; . transcendent. While all things exist in God let me be born. He performed (immanent), panentheism does not . austerity. Having performed simplistically equate the world with God. austerity, he created all this, God is much more than the universe whatever is here. Having created it, (transcendent). God is always here and now. into it, indeed, he entered.',5 Many beautiful Biblical texts are adduced in support of panentheistic theology. Psalm Isa Upanisad (1) opens with the famous 139, for example, speaks of God as the all exhortation to see the world clothed in God, encompassing reality outside of which " (Know that) all this, whatever moves in nothing exists. this moving world, is enveloped by God." It speaks of brahman as being within all You have searched me and known things as well as outside of everything. me; The existence of God in all and all in You know when I sit down and God is also a central theme in the when I rise up .... Bhagavadgita, expressed both You go before me and behind me, philosophically as well as poetically in And lay your hand upon me .... similes and metaphors. One of the most Where can I go from your Spirit? striking of these (7:7) likens God to the Or where can I flee from your string in a necklace of jewels. "On me," says presence? Krishna, "all this universe is strung like If I ascend to heaven, you are there; jewels on a string.',6 While the gems And if I make my bed in Sheol, you constituting a necklace differ in form and are there. properties, the string that runs through each If I take wings of the morning and is one and the same. In an analogous way, settle God is the comrrion and unifying reality in At the farthest limits of the sea, all creation. Elsewhere (9:6) all beings are https://digitalcommons.butler.edu/jhcs/vol16/iss1/8 DOI: 10.7825/2164-6279.1297 2 Rambachan: Advaita Vedanta and Marcus Borg: Opportunities for Hindu-Christian Dialogue 32 Anantanand Rambachan ,I i described as abiding and moving in God as beings, is not tainted by the defects of the the mighty wind exists and blows about in world as "He is outside." space. The significance of panentheistic The Advaita tradition,. however, does theology in Hinduism may be appreciated not stop with the characterization of the also from the fact that seeing the divine divine-world relationship as one of existing equally in all beings is considered panentheism. While able to agree with to be the hallmark of wisdom and liberation Borg's representation God as "a nonmaterial (13:28). The Bhagavadgita (18:20) layer or level or dimension of reality," commends the knowledge that enables us to pervading all things, the tradition wishes to see "one imperishable Being in all beings, characterize further the relationship between undivided in separate beings." A false and the nonmaterial and material as. not-two inferior way of seeing is to regard things as (cidvaita). Describing the relationship isolated, separate and independent of each between-brahman and the world as advaita other and to see in all beings "separate must, however, also be differentiated from entities of various kinds (18:21).,,7 pantheism. Sankara, it should be noted, does The Advaita Vedanta tradition will also not entirely equate the world with brahman. want, like Borg, to differentiate between For Sankara, the fact that brahman is panenthiesm and pantheism.8 Although the describeGl as the cause and the world as the Hindu doctrine of God is often represented effect implies some difference. If no i I as pantheistic, immanence is never differences obtain, the distinction would be I, emphasized at the expense of transcendence.