DOCSLIB.ORG

Singapore Local Government System Falls Broadly Within the Allan Model of Virtual Local Government

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Singapore Local Government System Falls Broadly Within the Allan Model of Virtual Local Government Virtual Local Government in Practice: * The Case of Town Councils in Singapore Brian Dollery School of Economics University of New England ARMIDALE NSW 2351 Wai Ho Leong Lin Crase Barclays Capital School of Business Level 28, One Raffles Quay La Trobe University South Tower WODONGA VIC 3689 SINGAPORE 048583 Scholars of governance have long sought to develop taxonomic systems of local government that encompass all conceivable institutional arrangements for delivering local goods and services under democratic oversight. A complete typology of this kind would include not only observable real-world municipal models, but also theoretically feasible prototypes not yet in existence. However, despite a growing literature in the area, no universally accepted taxonomy has yet been developed. Notwithstanding this gap in the conceptual literature, existing typological schema have nevertheless proved valuable for both the examination of the characteristics of actual local government systems as well as for comparative studies of different municipal institutional arrangements. For instance, Dollery and Johnson’s (2005) taxonomy of Australian local government has formed the basis of an embryonic literature that seeks to locate the many new municipal * Brian Dollery acknowledges the financial support provided by Australian Research Council Discovery Grant DP0770520. The authors would like to thank Mr Chong Weng Yong of the Singapore Housing and Development Board for his kind and valuable assistance in the research for this paper. The views expressed in the paper are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not represent the views of any organization. © Canadian Journal of Regional Science/Revue canadienne des sciences régionales, XXXI: 2 (Summer/Été 2008), 289-304. ISSN: 0705-4580 Printed in Canada/Imprimé au Canada 290 DOLLERY, LEONG AND CRASE service delivery models that are springing up across Australia. However, two of the seven models identified by Dollery and Johnson (2005) have no real-world counterparts in Australian local governance. Virtual local government is the most interesting of these two absent models since it not only has its own small literature, but also appears practically feasible. The question thus naturally arises as to whether an actual local government system exists in any other country that approximates the theoretical model of virtual municipal councils. Fortunately, the unique Singaporean system of town councils comes close to the conceptual model of virtual local governance advanced by Percy Allan (2001, 2003) and other scholars. An examination of local government in Singapore would thus throw light on both the robustness of the theoretical model itself and the characteristics of Singaporean municipal arrangements. This represents the aim of the present article. The article is divided into five main parts. First, there is a synoptic description of local government in Singapore. Then, a review is given of the various taxonomic classificatory systems for local government systems and municipal models. This is followed by an outline of the theoretical basis for Allan’s (2001, 2003) model of virtual local government. A separate section is devoted to an evaluation of Singaporean town councils in terms of the Allan model. Finally, we end with some brief concluding comments which seeks to generalize the discussion for local government systems in other jurisdictions. Local Government in Singapore The origins of the present system of local governance in Singapore can be traced back to the increasing complexities involved in the provision of public housing that accommodates a substantial majority of citizens. On 1 February 1960, the Housing and Development Board (HDB) was established as a statutory board of the Ministry of National Development to improve on the hitherto unsatisfactory rate of large-scale public housing construction. The HDB was established with two primary purposes in mind: to provide adequate housing for lower and middle- income households, largely in the form of apartments, and to provide management services for public housing (Wong and Yeh 1985). However, with around half a million flats provided in the first 25 years of operation of the HDB, the provision of adequate management services had become increasingly complex. Despite advantages accruing to a single large organization generating these services, it was argued that this had given rise to “a lack of opportunities for public housing residents to participate in the management of their own estates and to establish a sense of belonging and identity” (Lim Lan 1996: 2). Accordingly, it was decided to institute a system of town councils each of which would manage their own estates. The rationale for the establishment of town councils thus appears to have been two-fold, with the twin aims of “‘educating’ public housing residents and inculcating more responsibility among voters as well as an effort at decentralizing the management of public housing estates” (Ooi 1990: 4). On 1 September 1984, three pilot town councils were created. Their success VIRTUAL LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN PRACTICE 291 led directly to the Town Councils Act (TCA) of 1988 that formed the legislative basis for a fully-fledged system of town councils across Singapore. The new system emerged in three distinct phases: 9 Phase I councils were created in November 1988; 9 Phase II councils came into being in July 1989; and 9 Phase III councils materialized in July 1990. By March 1991, town councils had assumed management of all public housing estates (Ooi 1997). However, by 1997, the number of councils had been pared back to 16 (Ooi 2003: 167). A town council can be established for a single national Parliamentary constituency or for a multiple Parliamentary constituency (GRC). It consists of a Chairman (who must be an MP) and not more than ten appointed members for each elected MP to a maximum of thirty members. The Chairman appoints and dismisses all appointed councilors, presides over meetings, and signs annual financial statements. Town councils appoint committees to deal with defined tasks and they enjoy the delegated powers of a town council and operate under Town Council Financial Rules. Committee functions include obtaining feedback on residents and business, promoting council activities, providing maintenance services, improving the physical environment, and handling budgetary matters. With respect to the implementation and operation of council policy, each town council is a body corporate and appoints a Town Council Secretary to assume responsibility for the administration and management of its affairs. A council is empowered to employ staff directly or appoint a managing agent. In practice, town councils typically hire a managing agent to conduct their business, generally one of two estate management firms originally established by the HDB (Ooi 2003: 163). The process of competitive tendering by prospective managing agents is closely circumscribed by legislation. Under Section 32(2), the TCA empowers any given town council to delegate to any managing agent all or any of the powers, functions and duties prescribed by the Act or any other Act vested in the town council. Furthermore, any power, function or duty so delegated may be exercised or performed by this agent in the name and on behalf of the town council in question. In addition, any delegation of power, function or duty under Section 32(2) of the TCA by a town council must be consistent with the Town Councils Financial Rules (TCFR). Rule 74 of the TCFR lays down the procedure for tenders if a town council wants to invite tender for the services of a managing agent to carry out its powers, functions and duties under the TCA. The actual period of any managing agent contract will depend on the how the term is specified in the contract itself or upon dissolution of the town council. If the performance of a contracted managing agent is deemed to be unacceptably bad, then the provision of the managing agent contract could be invoked that enables the town council to take the appropriate action against the managing agent concerned. In addition, under Section 50 of the TCA, the Minister may appoint any person to exercise or perform certain powers, and so forth, where the Minister is satisfied that a town council has failed to keep or maintain any part of the common property in the housing estates of the HDB within the town ‘in a state of good and serviceable repair or in a proper and clean condition or that any duty of a Town Council must be carried out urgently in order to remove any 292 DOLLERY, LEONG AND CRASE imminent danger to the health or safety of residents of the housing estates’. Finally, the issue of how often town councils change managing agents depends on the terms in the managing agent contract with the town council in question and can thus vary. Singaporean town councils are charged with controlling, managing, maintaining and improving the common areas and common facilities of the residential and commercial premises within their jurisdiction. Common areas embrace public zones and common facilities incorporate recreational and community facilities, including common areas of residential buildings, such as elevators, corridors, service installations and fire systems. In order to finance these activities, town councils can levy fees and charges, borrow funds and invest any surplus monies. Apartment owners must pay monthly ‘service and conservancy’ charges based on such characteristics as their flat type, citizenship and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Singapore's Dominant Party System
    Tan, Kenneth Paul (2017) “Singapore’s Dominant Party System”, in Governing Global-City Singapore: Legacies and Futures after Lee Kuan Yew, Routledge 1 Singapore’s dominant party system On the night of 11 September 2015, pundits, journalists, political bloggers, aca- demics, and others in Singapore’s chattering classes watched in long- drawn amazement as the media reported excitedly on the results of independent Singa- pore’s twelfth parliamentary elections that trickled in until the very early hours of the morning. It became increasingly clear as the night wore on, and any optimism for change wore off, that the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) had swept the votes in something of a landslide victory that would have puzzled even the PAP itself (Zakir, 2015). In the 2015 general elections (GE2015), the incumbent party won 69.9 per cent of the total votes (see Table 1.1). The Workers’ Party (WP), the leading opposition party that had five elected members in the previous parliament, lost their Punggol East seat in 2015 with 48.2 per cent of the votes cast in that single- member constituency (SMC). With 51 per cent of the votes, the WP was able to hold on to Aljunied, a five-member group representation constituency (GRC), by a very slim margin of less than 2 per cent. It was also able to hold on to Hougang SMC with a more convincing win of 57.7 per cent. However, it was undoubtedly a hard defeat for the opposition. The strong performance by the PAP bucked the trend observed since GE2001, when it had won 75.3 per cent of the total votes, the highest percent- age since independence.
    [Show full text]
  • Jaclyn L. Neo
    Jaclyn L. Neo NAVIGATING MINORITY INCLUSION AND PERMANENT DIVISION: MINORITIES AND THE DEPOLITICIZATION OF ETHNIC DIFFERENCE* INTRODUCTION dapting the majority principle in electoral systems for the ac- commodation of political minorities is a crucial endeavour if A one desires to prevent the permanent disenfranchisement of those minorities. Such permanent exclusion undermines the maintenance and consolidation of democracy as there is a risk that this could lead to po- litical upheaval should the political minorities start to see the system as op- pressive and eventually revolt against it. These risks are particularly elevat- ed in the case of majoritarian systems, e.g. those relying on simple plurality where the winner is the candidate supported by only a relative majority, i.e. having the highest number of votes compared to other candidates1. Further- more, such a system, while formally equal, could however be considered substantively unequal since formal equality often fails to recognize the es- pecial vulnerabilities of minority groups and therefore can obscure the need to find solutions to address those vulnerabilities. Intervention in strict majoritarian systems is thus sometimes deemed necessary to preserve effective participation of minorities in political life to ensure a more robust democracy. Such intervention has been considered es- pecially important in societies characterized by cleavages such as race/ethnicity, religion, language, and culture, where there is a need to en- sure that minority groups are not permanently excluded from the political process. This could occur when their voting choices almost never produce the outcomes they desire or when, as candidates, they almost never receive the sufficient threshold of support to win elections.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Harmony in Singapore: Spaces, Practices and Communities 469190 789811 9 Lee Hsien Loong, Prime Minister of Singapore
    Religious Harmony in Singapore: Spaces, Practices and Communities Inter-religious harmony is critical for Singapore’s liveability as a densely populated, multi-cultural city-state. In today’s STUDIES URBAN SYSTEMS world where there is increasing polarisation in issues of race and religion, Singapore is a good example of harmonious existence between diverse places of worship and religious practices. This has been achieved through careful planning, governance and multi-stakeholder efforts, and underpinned by principles such as having a culture of integrity and innovating systematically. Through archival research and interviews with urban pioneers and experts, Religious Harmony in Singapore: Spaces, Practices and Communities documents the planning and governance of religious harmony in Singapore from pre-independence till the present and Communities Practices Spaces, Religious Harmony in Singapore: day, with a focus on places of worship and religious practices. Religious Harmony “Singapore must treasure the racial and religious harmony that it enjoys…We worked long and hard to arrive here, and we must in Singapore: work even harder to preserve this peace for future generations.” Lee Hsien Loong, Prime Minister of Singapore. Spaces, Practices and Communities 9 789811 469190 Religious Harmony in Singapore: Spaces, Practices and Communities Urban Systems Studies Books Water: From Scarce Resource to National Asset Transport: Overcoming Constraints, Sustaining Mobility Industrial Infrastructure: Growing in Tandem with the Economy Sustainable Environment:
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Public Housing Upgrading on Residents
    APNHR CONFERENCE Housing and Social Development: Emerging Theoretical Issues in Asia-Pacific 5-6 February 2004 The University of Hong Kong Impact of Public Housing Upgrading on Residents Shi-Ming YU Department of Real Estate National University of Singapore Abstract The upgrading of HDB flats has a direct impact on residents in many ways. First, from the economic perspective, they have to make a financial commitment with the aim to enhance the value of their assets as a result of upgrading. Second, as the upgrading works are carried out with occupation, they will have to cope with the attendant problems and inconvenience of upgrading. And third, from the social and community perspective, upgrading provides the precinct and neighbourhood an opportunity to create an identity and improve the overall living environment. Given this impact, residents must play a direct and active role in the upgrading process. This paper discusses the impact of upgrading through residents’ perception as well as the mechanisms, methods and management of resident participation in the upgrading projects. While upgrading and renewal are an important component of public housing, they need to be carried out with a complete understanding of residents’ needs and perceptions, which may change over time. Key words: HDB upgrading, impact on residents, resident participation Introduction Upgrading of flats built by the Housing and Development Board (HDB) in Singapore has gained significance over the last decade as the majority of flats built in the 1960s, 70s and 80s have become less attractive when compared to the new HDB flats built since the 1990s. Given the terminability of the life cycle of buildings, upgrading has become imperative if these older flats are to be able to continue to provide the standard of living environment comparable to that being provided by the new flats.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2020
    TANJONG PAGAR TOWN COUNCIL Annual Report 2019/2020 Tanjong Pagar Town Council | Annual Report 2019/2020 Tanjong Pagar Town Council Audited Financial Statements, Auditor’s Report and Annual Report for FY 2019/2020 S. 107 of 2021 12 March 2021 Contents Page Chairman's Message 3 主席的话 4 Amanat Pengerusi 7 தலைவ쏍 செயத鎿 8 Composition and Structure 10 Financial Statements 11 - 53 1 Tanjong Pagar Town Council | Annual Report 2019/2020 Chairman’s Message Dear Residents, I hope that you are staying well during these trying times. COVID-19 has been a test of our social fabric, and our strong collective response is testament to the strong community bonds that we have fostered over the years. But the fight against the pandemic will be long, and I hope that everyone continues to remain vigilant. In recent months, Tanjong Pagar Town Council has been working hard to ensure that our neighbourhoods remain a safe space for all, while preparing to further improve our estates in the coming years. Initiatives such as increasing the frequency of cleaning and disinfecting of common areas, observing safe distancing and crowd control at markets are some of the precautionary measures taken by our Town Council’s frontline workers. We also launched our new Town Council 5-year Masterplan. In the coming years, one of our key focus areas is to enhance the biodiversity within our Town so that our residents can enjoy more green spaces in their neighbourhoods for recreation and leisure activities. Cleanliness of our estates will continue to be an important focus, and we will work with you to make our Town one of the cleanest estates in Singapore.
    [Show full text]
  • Lim Boon Heng Says Bye to Political Stage
    60 cents | MICA (P) 142/09/2010 25 15February aPrIL 2011 2011 UBudget Care Fund Lim Boon Heng Says IsGoogies Halfway There p5 Bye To Political Stage But NTUC Links Will Remain We respect Boon Heng a lot because he is not only an outstanding leader, but also a “selfless leader. He always gives his best in serving the workers and people. At the same time, he also does his best to nurture his successors and next generation of leaders. In the Labour Movement, he guided me and made me his successor as Secretary-General of NTUC when he was only 58-years- old. And now, as the Chairman of PAP, he is retiring early to make way for younger leaders to step forward. It shows how much he cares for the success and progress of Singapore, not just the present, but also the future.” NTUC Secretary-General Lim Swee Say Minister Lim Boon Heng (left), Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam (centre) and NTUC Deputy Secretary-General Halimah Yacob (right) after winning Jurong GRC in 2006. By Marcus Lin urious political pundits finally got the answer.a fter more than 30 stand for the presidential election due later this year, Minister Lim said years of public service, Minister in the Prime Minister's Office and categorically “I do not wish to be President” and that his future plans anchor Minister for Jurong GrC Lim boon Heng, 63, will call it are more modest. a day at the end of this electoral term. He broke the news at the Importantly, he said the PaP has found a slate of very good launch of the Jurong Town Council's five-year concept master candidates who meet the standards, thus allowing him to “retire, plan on 10 april 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • The Singapore Opposition: “Credibility” – the Primary Impediment to Coalition Building
    Syracuse University SURFACE Maxwell School – Distinction Theses Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public (Undergraduate) Affairs Spring 2014 The Singapore Opposition: “Credibility” – The Primary Impediment to Coalition Building Brian Steinberg [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/distinction Part of the Comparative Politics Commons, and the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Steinberg, Brian, "The Singapore Opposition: “Credibility” – The Primary Impediment to Coalition Building" (2014). Maxwell School – Distinction Theses (Undergraduate). 4. https://surface.syr.edu/distinction/4 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maxwell School – Distinction Theses (Undergraduate) by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 The Singapore Opposition: “Credibility” – The Primary Impediment to Coalition Building A Capstone Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Renée Crown University Honors Program at Syracuse University Brian Steinberg Candidate for B.A. Degree and Renée Crown University Honors May 2014 Honors Capstone Project in Political Science Capstone Project Advisor: _______________________ Professor Jonathan Hanson Capstone Project Reader: _______________________ Professor Mathew Cleary Honors Director: _______________________ Stephen Kuusisto, Director Date: 5/1/2014 Abstract This thesis studies opposition party behavior in competitive authoritarian regimes using the Singapore 2011 general election as a case study. The study asks, what is the primary reason Worker’s Party, the strongest opposition party in Singapore, did not pursue the formation of a pre-electoral coalition? I analyzed the pre-existing theories and conducted fieldwork, interviewing opposition party leaders, academics and activists, to ascertain a direct impediment and not just a background condition to coalition building.
    [Show full text]
  • Singapore | Freedom House
    Singapore | Freedom House https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2019/singapore Singapore | Freedom House POLITICAL RIGHTS: 19 / 40 A. ELECTORAL PROCESS: 4 / 12 A1. Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? 1 / 4 The government is led by a prime minister and cabinet formed by the party that controls the legislature. The current prime minster, Lee Hsien Loong, has been in power since 2004 and secured a new mandate after the 2015 parliamentary elections. While polling-day procedures are generally free of irregularities, numerous structural factors impede the development of viable electoral competition. The president, whose role is largely ceremonial, is elected by popular vote for six-year terms, and a special committee is empowered to vet candidates. Under 2016 constitutional amendments on eligibility, none of Singapore’s three main ethnic groupings (Malays, Chinese, and Indians or others) may be excluded from the presidency for more than five consecutive terms, and presidential candidates from the private sector, as opposed to senior officials with at least three years of service, must have experience leading a company with at least S$500 million (US$370 million) in shareholder equity. Only one candidate—Halimah Yacob, backed by the PAP—was declared eligible for the 2017 presidential election, making her the winner by default. A2. Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? 2 / 4 The unicameral Parliament elected in 2015 includes 13 members from single-member constituencies and 76 members from Group Representation Constituencies (GRCs). The top-polling party in each GRC wins all of its three to six seats, which has historically bolstered the majority of the dominant PAP.
    [Show full text]
  • (PDF)295KB***Government Funding of Town Councils: the Role Of
    (2018) 30 SAcLJ 944 (Published on e-First 29 May 2019) GOVERNMENT FUNDING OF TOWN COUNCILS The Role of Private Law Benjamin Joshua ONG* BA (Jurisprudence) (Oxon), BCL (Oxon); Advocate & Solicitor (Singapore); Assistant Professor of Law, Singapore Management University. Section 42 of the Town Councils Act (Cap 329A, 2000 Rev Ed) provides for the Government to provide grants to Town Councils “subject to such conditions as the Minister may determine”. The imposition of such conditions can be useful in theory. However, there is no clear mechanism by which such conditions may be enforced. This article proposes that this lacuna be filled as follows: such conditions are to take the form of private-law relationships between the Government and Town Councils. After outlining the benefits of this proposal, the article critiques the Court of Appeal’s decision in a 2016 case which held that such private-law relationships cannot exist as a matter of law, and explains why the proposal would be compatible with both the policy behind the Town Council scheme and the terms of the Town Councils Act. The article ends by commenting on how the proposal may be implemented in practice by means of contracts, trusts or bailments. I. Introduction: Use of grant conditions 1 Since the introduction of the Town Councils Act1 (“TCA”) in 1989, the common property in public housing estates is managed by * The author is grateful to three anonymous reviewers and to Jack Tsen-Ta Lee for their helpful comments on previous versions of this article and the ideas discussed therein. However, all errors and omissions remain the author’s own.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2020
    A COVID-19 SPECIAL ANNUAL REPORT 2019 - 2020 CONTENTS PATRON S MESSAGE 01 Patron’s Message COMMUNITY Outreach We are living in unprecedented times: 02 Pastor and Chaplain’s Message 36 Casework & Counselling Covid-19 has brought fundamental changes 03 Chairman’s Message Legal Clinic to the way in which we live our lives and 04 Management Committee 37 Bursary & Scholarship some of these changes will be here to 05 Staff Team 38 Home Wellness stay even after the pandemic has been 39 Community Involvement ENRICHMENT HUB 40 Dover Seniors Services @Block 13 vanquished. Due to safe distancing, social 08 Children & Youth Programmes work has had to evolve by leveraging on 10 Seniors Programmes VolunteerS & technology to overcome restrictions on Corporate MANAGEMENT physical interaction. It is heartening to learn CHILDREN & Youth Services 44 Volunteer Management & Development that even during the circuit breaker period, 14 The Learning Hub 46 Corporate Community Volunteers FaithActs was able to continue serving Girls’ Empowered (GEm) 48 Corporate Highlights her clients through telecare and online 15 Tuition - Mentoring 50 Corporate Community Involvement programmes. 16 KidsLEAP 52 Corporate Social Responsibility Engagement 17 Early Learning Programme Plus (ELP+) 54 Fund-Raising Activities 18 Junior Chef 56 List of Donors and Corporate Sponsors It has been inspiring to witness how Experiential Learning Journey 58 Disclosure Report FaithActs’ staff responded incredibly well Dr Chia Shi-Lu 19 Sports, Adventure and Outings FY19-20 Disclosure of to these challenges, for example, by pulling Member of Parliament for Tanjong Pagar GRC (Queenstown) 20 Group Work, Talks, Workshops Board Members Attendance together their resources within a short Chairman, General Parliamentary Committee for Health window of time to distribute masks to Vice-Chairman, Tanjong Pagar Town Council SENIORS Services Covid-19 SpeCial (2011 – 2020) residents and seniors who are living alone, 26 Wow Workout 62 With our beneficiaries during lockdown within her vicinity.
    [Show full text]
  • Bca Green Mark for Buildings Award
    Welcome to the BCA Awards 2011 The BCA Awards is an annual event to honour and pay tribute to displays of excellence in the built environment in the areas of safety, quality, sustainability and user-friendliness. This year, it marks a few firsts in the building and construction industry; BCA introduced new award categories such as The Green Building Individual Awards and the Construction Productivity Awards to mark the evolution of the industry, and collectively the industry attained a record number of 261 awards in the following categories: 164 Green Mark Awards 4 Green Building Individual Awards 13 Universal Design Awards 28 Construction Excellence Awards 8 Design and Engineering Safety Excellence Awards 10 Green and Gracious Builder Awards 31 Construction Productivity Awards 3 Built Environment Leadership Awards BCA congratulates all the winners, for their unwavering commitment to excellence and dedication in driving the building and construction industry to greater heights. 1 CONTENTS BCA GREEN MARK CHAMPION AWARD 08 BCA Green Mark Platinum Champion Award - City Developments Limited 10 BCA Green Mark Champion Award - Housing & Development Board 11 BCA GREEN MARK FOR BUILDINGS AWARD 12 Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise – CREATE 14 CleanTech One 14 Grundfos Singapore 15 JCube 15 Land Transport Authority Customer Service Centre 16 Max Atria Annex 16 Metropolis 17 Ministry of Manpower, Bendemeer Service Centre 17 Ngee Ann Poly seventy3 18 One Raffles Place Tower 2 18 Quayside Isle 19 Rolls-Royce Achord 19 Rolls-Royce
    [Show full text]
  • The Rebounding of the People's Action Party of Singapore in 2015
    Asian International Studies Review Vol. 17 No.2 (December 2016): 177-197 177 Received September 4, 2016 Revised November 11, 2016 Accepted November 25, 2016 The Rebounding of the People’s Action Party of Singapore in 2015: An Electoral Analysis of Three Hotly Contested Constituencies MUSTAFA IZZUDDIN* The 2015 Singapore General Elections (GE) produced a puz- zling outcome. Although it was predicted by analysts that the People’s Action Party (PAP) would rebound, the depth of victory by way of popular vote of 69.9 percent was confound- ding. Given also that the Workers’ Party of Singapore (WP) was expected to retain Aljunied Group Representation Consti- tuency (GRC) as well as the Single Member Constituency (SMC) of Hougang and Punggol East, it further flummoxed analysts when the WP lost Punggol East to the PAP, and WP had its margin of victory reduced in both Aljunied and Hou- gang. Epitomising PAP’s rebound was also the increased margin of victory in the PotongPasir SMC. Although the op- position, namely, the WP was expected to further pluralise the parliamentary system in Singapore by winning more seats in GE2015, the reverse took place in that the PAP not only rebounded from the 60.1 percent it received in GE2011, but also further entrenched its one-party dominance in governing Singapore. Based on an electoral analysis of three constitu- encies, Punggol East, PotongPasir and Aljunied, this article argues that these constituencies illustrate how the PAP reboun- ded while the WP retrogressed in GE2015. Pursuant to the electoral outcome, this article makes the case that there needs to be a re-evaluation when applying the concept of authori- tarianism to Singapore’s context.
    [Show full text]