The 2015 General Election and Singapore's Political Forecast : White Clouds, Blue Skies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The 2015 General Election and Singapore's Political Forecast : White Clouds, Blue Skies This document is downloaded from DR‑NTU (https://dr.ntu.edu.sg) Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. The 2015 general election and Singapore's political forecast : white clouds, blue skies Weiss, Meredith L.; Loke, Hoe‑Yeong; Choa, Luenne Angela 2015 Weiss, M. L., Loke, H.‑Y., & Choa, L. A. (2016). The 2015 general election and Singapore's political forecast : white clouds, blue skies. Asian Survey, 56(5), 859‑878. doi:10.1525/as.2016.56.5.859 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88157 https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2016.56.5.859 © 2016 The Regents of the University of California. This paper was published in Asian Survey and is made available as an electronic reprint (preprint) with permission of The Regents of the University of California. The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/as.2016.56.5.859]. One print or electronic copy may be made for personal use only. Systematic or multiple reproduction, distribution to multiple locations via electronic or other means, duplication of any material in this paper for a fee or for commercial purposes, or modification of the content of the paper is prohibited and is subject to penalties under law. Downloaded on 24 Sep 2021 01:00:28 SGT MEREDITH L. WEISS, HOE-YEONG LOKE, AND LUENNE ANGELA CHOA The 2015 General Election and Singapore’s Political Forecast White Clouds, Blue Skies ABSTRACT The People’s Action Party’s unexpectedly strong win in Singapore’s September 2015 general election illuminates the dynamics of opposition under electoral authoritar- ianism. The conduct and outcome of the election raise questions not just of why the much-hyped opposition efforts fizzled, but also of the implications for Singapore politics, moving forward. KEYWORDS: Singapore, electoral authoritarianism, elections, People’s Action Party, opposition politics THAT THE PERENNIALLY RULING PEOPLE’S ACTION PARTY (PAP) would win Singapore’s September 2015 general election, the country’s twelfth since independence in 1965, was a foregone conclusion. Even the most ambitious and promising opposition parties aspired not to form the government but to be a larger, more effective, yet ‘‘responsible’’ parliamentary opposition. Regardless, that the PAP not only won back one of the mere seven seats held by the opposition but also boosted its share of the popular vote by nearly 10 percentage points, to around 70%, surprised even the ruling party. Until MEREDITH L. WEISS is Professor of Political Science at the University at Albany, State University of New York. She has most recently edited the Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Malaysia (Rout- ledge, 2015) and Electoral Dynamics in Malaysia: Findings from the Grassroots (Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2014). She wishes to thank the University at Albany for funding this research, helpful informants from across Singapore’s political parties for their insights, and Eileena Lee for her enthusiastic companionship at rallies. HOE-YEONG LOKE is Associate Fellow at the European Union Centre in Singapore, a partnership of the National University of Singapore and Nanyang Tech- nological University. He is the author of Let the People Have Him—Chiam See Tong: The Early Years (Epigram Books, 2014). LUENNE ANGELA CHOA is the co-founder of Hornbills Concepts and Communications, a public affairs consultancy based in Singapore. Emails: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>. Asian Survey,Vol.56,Number5,pp.859–878.ISSN0004-4687,electronicISSN1533-838X. © 2016 by The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Please direct all requests for permission to photocopy or reproduce article content through the University of California Press’s Reprints and Permissionswebpage,http://www.ucpress.edu/journals.php?p¼reprints.DOI:10.1525/AS.2016.56.5.859. 859 860 ASIAN SURVEY 56:5 polling day, parties on both sides, observers, and even supposedly astute bookmakers had assumed that the PAP would lose a few more seats. Indeed, opposition gains in 2011 had left many observers predicting a near-inexorable shift toward a more liberal, two-party system to supplant Singapore’s long- standing dominant-party, hybrid system. The conduct and outcome of the election raise questions not just of why the much-hyped challenge fizzled, but also of the implications for Singapore’s political trajectory. While the opposition performed worse this time than in 2011, its salience cannot be read only from polling results. The different approaches and results across opposition parties offer insight into what works for would-be challengers, however hamstrung by internal disorganization, limited resources, and structural hurdles. More important, these polls illu- minate the roles political opposition plays in a stable hybrid system: the extent to which a vocal opposition may push the dominant party to reform (or at least to justify its policy choices better) despite structural constraints; whether voters prioritize ‘‘voice’’ beyond effective policy outcomes; how much personality matters amid a substantially partisan vote; what tools and niches challengers can exploit in pressing their case; and how both sides extend their reach beyond core supporters to a growing mass of swing voters or those of unknown sympathies. As an opposition Workers’ Party (WP) campaign metaphor suggested, referring to the WP’s signature blue and the PAP’s white, voters choose between ‘‘blue sky’’ and shape-shifting ‘‘white clouds.’’ Even should the clouds block out the blue, both share space in Singapore’s electoral firmament.1 CONDUCT AND RESULTS OF THE ELECTION The defining features of hybrid, or electoral authoritarian, regimes are curbs on civil liberties and skewed elections—in Schedler’s terms, kinks or discon- tinuities in the ‘‘chain of democratic choice.’’2 The conjunction of these dimensions is readily apparent in Singaporean elections. The voting process itself is above reproach, although opposition parties and the human rights 1. Sylvia Lim, WP rally speech, September 4, 2015, <http://www.wp.sg/sylvia-lims-rally-speech- yishun-stadium-rally-4-sep/>, accessed October 25, 2015. 2. Andreas Schedler, ‘‘The Menu of Manipulation,’’ Journal of Democracy 13:2 (April 2002), pp. 36–50; see also Larry Diamond, ‘‘Thinking about Hybrid Regimes,’’ Journal of Democracy 13:2 (April 2002), pp. 21–35. WEISS, LOKE, AND CHOA / SINGAPORE’S 2015 ELECTION 861 group Maruah (Dignity)3 have found it necessary to persuade skeptical voters that their vote is secret, thanks to the use of serial numbers on ballot papers. Campaigns are tightly regulated, too, to be rigorously ‘‘fair’’: for instance, each party is allotted time proportionate to its number of candidates for televised ‘‘party political broadcasts,’’ and strict rules govern how many pos- ters and banners each candidate or party may display.4 Regardless, the opposition faces hurdles. Most obviously, it is only during the official campaign period, constitutionally mandated to be between nine and 56 days, that rallies and open campaigning are allowed. The 2015 campaign lasted only 10 days, including an eerily silent ‘‘cooling-off day’’ introduced in 2011, when campaigning is prohibited. Even then, precise parameters surround the methods of canvassing that are permissible as well as the hours and venues of rallies (7–10 PM, except for two downtown noon rallies; for these, parties chose venues by lot, one day in advance). Rules on online campaign efforts have been progressively loosened, yet curbs persist on political videos, and the PAP’s control of mainstream media magnifies its advantage. A mixture of multimember group representation constituencies (GRCs) and single member constituencies (SMCs), whose composition and bound- aries shift with each election, ensures minority representation; each GRC must include at least one member from among the minority groups that comprise about one-quarter of Singapore’s population. GRCs, however, complicate competition for opposition parties. Not only must the party come up with a full slate of plausible candidates but also each candidate pays a steep deposit, SG$ 14,500 (US$ 10,422) this year, which is forfeited should the candidate poll below 12.5% of votes. (Only the two independents who ran in 2015 lost their deposits, and the Reform Party squeaked through with 12.7% in one SMC.) Nevertheless, for the first time since independence, all parliamentary seats were contested: 13 SMCs and 16 GRCs, each with between four and six members, for a total of 89 seats. Complementing these elected MPs are appointed non-constituency members of parliament (‘‘best losers’’ from the opposition; the Elections Department invites those candidates who secured 3. Maruah, ‘‘Vote Wisely. Vote without Fear. The Vote Is Secret,’’ September 6, 2015, <http:// maruah.org/2015/09/06/vote-wisely-vote-without-fear-the-vote-is-secret/>, accessed October 26, 2015. 4. The Singapore Elections Department website enumerates these guidelines in a downloadable handbook: <http://www.eld.gov.sg/pdf/GE2015/Candidate%20Handbook%20for%20Parliament ary%20Election%202015_1.pdf>, accessed October 25, 2015. 862 ASIAN SURVEY 56:5 the highest shares of popular votes, but not enough to win, to join the parliament), an innovation introduced in 1984 to ensure a minimum num- ber of non-PAP MPs (currently nine). (Up to nine nominated members of parliament, drawn from key societal sectors rather than political parties, complete the mix.) More parties than usual contested in 2015, including two parties formed since the last election. Part of the reason for the PAP’s greater vote share was simply that some seats that had been walkovers previously (and hence not included in the party’s vote tally), or that were not claimed by more estab- lished opposition parties, were now contested by weaker parties seeking an available niche. The PAP’s especially strong results in such seats—as high as 79% in five-member Jurong and six-member Ang Mo Kio, and 78% in previously uncontested five-member Tanjong Pagar (Lee Kuan Yew’s former constituency)—increased the PAP’s overall average.
Recommended publications
  • HIGHLIGHTS a Strong Home Team for a Safe and Secure Home
    2/2020 HIGHLIGHTS COMMITTEE OF SUPPLY (COS) DEBATE 2020 At the COS Debate in Parliament, Minister K Shanmugam, Second Minister Josephine Teo, Senior Parliamentary Secretary Amrin Amin and Senior Parliamentary Secretary Sun Xueling outlined key initiatives undertaken by the Home Team and how our Home Team Guardians are working to keep Singapore safe and secure. A Strong Home Team for a Safe and Secure Home Read the Speech by Minister K Shanmugam. Transforming the Home Team to Safeguard Singapore Read the Speech by Second Minister Josephine Teo. Combating Drug Abuse and Strengthening Rehabilitation Together Read the Speech by Senior Parliamentary Secretary Amrin Amin. Together, A Safe and Secure Home Read the Speech by Senior Parliamentary Secretary Sun Xueling. INITIATIVE TO CURB FAMILY VIOLENCE LAUNCH OF INTER-AGENCY TASK FORCE Saying No to Family Violence Expansion of Home Team CARES The educational picture book ‘A Day with At the launch event, SPS Sun also announced the Bob’ was launched by SPS Sun Xueling launch of a new inter-agency task force to offer MHA & MND, together with SPS greater support to victims of family violence. The task Muhammad Faishal Ibrahim MSF, on 17 force will be co-chaired by SPS Sun and SPS Faishal. February. A collaboration between Ang Among the initiatives that will be rolled out is an Mo Kio Police Division and PAVE, a expansion of the scope of Home Team CARES voluntary welfare organisation that (Community Assistance and Referral Scheme). specialises in the management of First piloted at Bedok Police Division in January 2019, interpersonal violence, the book carries a Home Team CARES will be expanded for very important message for children – social workers to provide support to next-of-kin not to be ashamed if they are victims of of offenders in family violence cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Group Representation Constituencies
    Sembawang Sengkang West SMC GRC Hougang SMC Punggol East SMC Polling Marsiling- Yew Tee GRC Chua Chu Kang Nee Soon Pulau Ubin Pulau GRC GRC Tekong Bukit Holland- Panjang Bukit Timah Ang Mo Kio Pasir Ris- scorecard SMC GRC GRC Punggol GRC Hong Kah Here’s your guide to the polls. North SMC Bishan- Aljunied Tampines Toa Payoh GRC GRC You can ll in the results as they are GRC Jurong East Coast GRC released on www.straitstimes.com/ge2015 GRC and tick the winners as they are announced. West Marine Coast Tanjong Pagar Parade GRC GRC GRC Jalan Mountbatten Fengshan SMC Besar SMC Jurong GRC 6-member GRCs Island Bukit Batok MacPherson 5-member GRCs SMC Pulau Brani SMC Sentosa 4-member GRCs Pioneer SMC Yuhua SMC Radin Mas SMC Potong Pasir SMC SMCs GROUP REPRESENTATION CONSTITUENCIES Aljunied 148,142 voters Ang Mo Kio 187,771 voters Bishan-Toa Payoh 129,975 voters Votes cast Spoilt votes Votes cast Spoilt votes Votes cast Spoilt votes WP No. of votes PAP No. of votes PAP No. of votes Low Thia Khiang, Sylvia Lim, 50 Chen Show Mao, Lee Hsien Loong, 63 Ang Hin Kee, 49 Intan Azura Ng Eng Hen, 56 Josephine Teo, 47 Chong Kee Hiong, 59 54 Mokhtar, 39 49 Muhamad Faisal Pritam Singh, 39 Gan Thiam Poh, 51 Darryl David, 44 Koh Poh Koon, 43 Chee Hong Tat, 41 Saktiandi Supaat, Abdul Manap, 40 41 PAP No. of votes RP No. of votes SPP No. of votes Yeo Guat Kwang, Victor Lye K. Muralidharan M. Ravi, 46 Gilbert Goh Jesse Loo Benjamin Pwee Mohamad Hamim Law Kim Hwee, 55 54 Thiam Fatt, 53 Pillai, 47 Keow Wah, 54 Hoe Bock, 52 Yek Kwan, 47 Aliyas, 51 Chua Eng Leong, Shamsul Kamar, 43 Osman Sulaiman, Roy Ngerng Siva Chandran, 31 Bryan Long Mohamad Abdillah 44 40 Yi Ling, 34 Yaoguang, 37 Zamzuri, 30 • It made history in 2011 as the rst GRC to be won by an opposition party, • Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s constituency had the highest GRC vote • The PAP team here has the largest share of new faces apart from a defeat for the PAP which saw two Cabinet ministers lose their seats.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Singapore's Dominant Party System
    Tan, Kenneth Paul (2017) “Singapore’s Dominant Party System”, in Governing Global-City Singapore: Legacies and Futures after Lee Kuan Yew, Routledge 1 Singapore’s dominant party system On the night of 11 September 2015, pundits, journalists, political bloggers, aca- demics, and others in Singapore’s chattering classes watched in long- drawn amazement as the media reported excitedly on the results of independent Singa- pore’s twelfth parliamentary elections that trickled in until the very early hours of the morning. It became increasingly clear as the night wore on, and any optimism for change wore off, that the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) had swept the votes in something of a landslide victory that would have puzzled even the PAP itself (Zakir, 2015). In the 2015 general elections (GE2015), the incumbent party won 69.9 per cent of the total votes (see Table 1.1). The Workers’ Party (WP), the leading opposition party that had five elected members in the previous parliament, lost their Punggol East seat in 2015 with 48.2 per cent of the votes cast in that single- member constituency (SMC). With 51 per cent of the votes, the WP was able to hold on to Aljunied, a five-member group representation constituency (GRC), by a very slim margin of less than 2 per cent. It was also able to hold on to Hougang SMC with a more convincing win of 57.7 per cent. However, it was undoubtedly a hard defeat for the opposition. The strong performance by the PAP bucked the trend observed since GE2001, when it had won 75.3 per cent of the total votes, the highest percent- age since independence.
    [Show full text]
  • Jaclyn L. Neo
    Jaclyn L. Neo NAVIGATING MINORITY INCLUSION AND PERMANENT DIVISION: MINORITIES AND THE DEPOLITICIZATION OF ETHNIC DIFFERENCE* INTRODUCTION dapting the majority principle in electoral systems for the ac- commodation of political minorities is a crucial endeavour if A one desires to prevent the permanent disenfranchisement of those minorities. Such permanent exclusion undermines the maintenance and consolidation of democracy as there is a risk that this could lead to po- litical upheaval should the political minorities start to see the system as op- pressive and eventually revolt against it. These risks are particularly elevat- ed in the case of majoritarian systems, e.g. those relying on simple plurality where the winner is the candidate supported by only a relative majority, i.e. having the highest number of votes compared to other candidates1. Further- more, such a system, while formally equal, could however be considered substantively unequal since formal equality often fails to recognize the es- pecial vulnerabilities of minority groups and therefore can obscure the need to find solutions to address those vulnerabilities. Intervention in strict majoritarian systems is thus sometimes deemed necessary to preserve effective participation of minorities in political life to ensure a more robust democracy. Such intervention has been considered es- pecially important in societies characterized by cleavages such as race/ethnicity, religion, language, and culture, where there is a need to en- sure that minority groups are not permanently excluded from the political process. This could occur when their voting choices almost never produce the outcomes they desire or when, as candidates, they almost never receive the sufficient threshold of support to win elections.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Harmony in Singapore: Spaces, Practices and Communities 469190 789811 9 Lee Hsien Loong, Prime Minister of Singapore
    Religious Harmony in Singapore: Spaces, Practices and Communities Inter-religious harmony is critical for Singapore’s liveability as a densely populated, multi-cultural city-state. In today’s STUDIES URBAN SYSTEMS world where there is increasing polarisation in issues of race and religion, Singapore is a good example of harmonious existence between diverse places of worship and religious practices. This has been achieved through careful planning, governance and multi-stakeholder efforts, and underpinned by principles such as having a culture of integrity and innovating systematically. Through archival research and interviews with urban pioneers and experts, Religious Harmony in Singapore: Spaces, Practices and Communities documents the planning and governance of religious harmony in Singapore from pre-independence till the present and Communities Practices Spaces, Religious Harmony in Singapore: day, with a focus on places of worship and religious practices. Religious Harmony “Singapore must treasure the racial and religious harmony that it enjoys…We worked long and hard to arrive here, and we must in Singapore: work even harder to preserve this peace for future generations.” Lee Hsien Loong, Prime Minister of Singapore. Spaces, Practices and Communities 9 789811 469190 Religious Harmony in Singapore: Spaces, Practices and Communities Urban Systems Studies Books Water: From Scarce Resource to National Asset Transport: Overcoming Constraints, Sustaining Mobility Industrial Infrastructure: Growing in Tandem with the Economy Sustainable Environment:
    [Show full text]
  • Singapore Local Government System Falls Broadly Within the Allan Model of Virtual Local Government
    Virtual Local Government in Practice: * The Case of Town Councils in Singapore Brian Dollery School of Economics University of New England ARMIDALE NSW 2351 Wai Ho Leong Lin Crase Barclays Capital School of Business Level 28, One Raffles Quay La Trobe University South Tower WODONGA VIC 3689 SINGAPORE 048583 Scholars of governance have long sought to develop taxonomic systems of local government that encompass all conceivable institutional arrangements for delivering local goods and services under democratic oversight. A complete typology of this kind would include not only observable real-world municipal models, but also theoretically feasible prototypes not yet in existence. However, despite a growing literature in the area, no universally accepted taxonomy has yet been developed. Notwithstanding this gap in the conceptual literature, existing typological schema have nevertheless proved valuable for both the examination of the characteristics of actual local government systems as well as for comparative studies of different municipal institutional arrangements. For instance, Dollery and Johnson’s (2005) taxonomy of Australian local government has formed the basis of an embryonic literature that seeks to locate the many new municipal * Brian Dollery acknowledges the financial support provided by Australian Research Council Discovery Grant DP0770520. The authors would like to thank Mr Chong Weng Yong of the Singapore Housing and Development Board for his kind and valuable assistance in the research for this paper. The views expressed in the paper are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not represent the views of any organization. © Canadian Journal of Regional Science/Revue canadienne des sciences régionales, XXXI: 2 (Summer/Été 2008), 289-304.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Public Housing Upgrading on Residents
    APNHR CONFERENCE Housing and Social Development: Emerging Theoretical Issues in Asia-Pacific 5-6 February 2004 The University of Hong Kong Impact of Public Housing Upgrading on Residents Shi-Ming YU Department of Real Estate National University of Singapore Abstract The upgrading of HDB flats has a direct impact on residents in many ways. First, from the economic perspective, they have to make a financial commitment with the aim to enhance the value of their assets as a result of upgrading. Second, as the upgrading works are carried out with occupation, they will have to cope with the attendant problems and inconvenience of upgrading. And third, from the social and community perspective, upgrading provides the precinct and neighbourhood an opportunity to create an identity and improve the overall living environment. Given this impact, residents must play a direct and active role in the upgrading process. This paper discusses the impact of upgrading through residents’ perception as well as the mechanisms, methods and management of resident participation in the upgrading projects. While upgrading and renewal are an important component of public housing, they need to be carried out with a complete understanding of residents’ needs and perceptions, which may change over time. Key words: HDB upgrading, impact on residents, resident participation Introduction Upgrading of flats built by the Housing and Development Board (HDB) in Singapore has gained significance over the last decade as the majority of flats built in the 1960s, 70s and 80s have become less attractive when compared to the new HDB flats built since the 1990s. Given the terminability of the life cycle of buildings, upgrading has become imperative if these older flats are to be able to continue to provide the standard of living environment comparable to that being provided by the new flats.
    [Show full text]
  • The Candidates
    BT INFOGRAPHICS GE2015 The candidates Bukit Batok Sengkang West SMC SMC Sembawang Punggol East GRC SMC Hougang Marsiling- SMC Yew Tee GRC Nee Soon GRC Chua Chu Kang AngAng Mo MoKio Kio Holland- Pasir Ris- GRC GRCGRC Bukit Punggol GRC Timah Hong Kah GRC North SMC Tampines Bishan- Aljunied GRC Toa Payoh GRC East Coast GRC Jurong GRC GRC West Coast GRC Marine Parade Tanjong Pagar GRC GRC Fengshan SMC FOUR-MEMBER GRC Jalan Besar Chua Chu Kang MacPherson SMC GRC (Estimated no. of electors: 119,848) Mountbatten SMC PEOPLE’S PEOPLE’S ACTION PARTY POWER PARTY Gan Kim Yong Goh Meng Seng Low Yen Ling Lee Tze Shih Pioneer Yuhua Bukit Panjang Radin Mas Potong Yee Chia Hsing Low Wai Choo SMC SMC SMC SMC Pasir SMC Zaqy Mohamad Syafarin Sarif East Coast SIX-MEMBER GRC FIVE-MEMBER GRC FOUR-MEMBER GRC SINGLE-MEMBER CONSTITUENCY (SMC) (Estimated no. electors: 99,015) PEOPLE’S WORKERS’ SIX-MEMBER GRC FIVE-MEMBER GRC ACTION PARTY PARTY Jessica Tan Daniel Goh Ang Mo Kio Aljunied Nee Soon Lee Yi Shyan Gerald Giam (Estimated no. of electors: 187,652) (Estimated no. of electors: 148,024) (Estimated no. of electors: 132,200) Lim Swee Say Leon Perera Maliki Bin Osman Fairoz Shariff PEOPLE’S THE REFORM WORKERS’ PEOPLE’S PEOPLE’S WORKERS’ Holland-Bukit Timah ACTION PARTY PARTY PARTY ACTION PARTY ACTION PARTY PARTY (Estimated no. of electors: 104,397) Ang Hin Kee Gilbert Goh Chen Show Mao Chua Eng Leong Henry Kwek Cheryl Denise Loh Darryl David Jesse Loo Low Thia Kiang K Muralidharan Pillai K Shanmugam Gurmit Singh Gan Thiam Poh M Ravi Faisal Abdul Manap Shamsul Kamar Lee Bee Wah Kenneth Foo Intan Azura Mokhtar Osman Sulaiman Pritam Singh Victor Lye Louis Ng Luke Koh PEOPLE’S SINGAPORE ACTION PARTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY Koh Poh Koon Roy Ngerng Sylvia Lim Yeo Guat Kwang Faishal Ibrahim Ron Tan Christopher De Souza Chee Soon Juan Lee Hsien Loong Siva Chandran Liang Eng Hwa Chong Wai Fung Bishan-Toa Payoh Sembawang Sim Ann Paul Ananth Tambyah Pasir Ris-Punggol (Estimated no.
    [Show full text]
  • 70Th Anniversary Pooja Chathayam 2018 Charity Transparency Award
    ISSUE 01. 2019 70th Anniversary Pooja Charity Transparency Award 2018 On 18 June 2018, Sree Narayana Mission (SNM) SNM won the Charity Transparency Award 2018 celebrated its 70th year anniversary. A special for the first time, a testament to its high standards of Guru Pooja attended by SNM members was corporate governance and transparency. SNM is one held at the Mission, followed by a cake-cutting of 47 charities to win this award, among the over 2000 ceremony and a vegetarian dinner. This event was the first in a series of celebrations to mark registered charities in Singapore. SNM will continue to SNM’s 70th anniversary. meet the highest levels of governance and will work towards attaining the next tier of corporate governance awards, the Charity Governance Award. Chathayam 2018 As a show of solidarity with the victims of the August 2018 Kerala flood crisis, SNM scaled down its Chathayam celebrations to mark the Guru’s 164th Birth Anniversary. It held a Chathayam Observance on Sunday, 2 Sep 2018. The Saturday Cultural Programme was cancelled and Senior Minister of State Edwin Tong was invited as Guest-of-Honour, and Minister Ong Ye Kung as Special Guest. Members of the Inter-Religious Organisation Singapore were also invited to conduct a special joint prayer for the flood victims. SNM also partnered with the Singapore Red Cross to raise $14,000.00 for the relief effort. MOU with Cycling Without Age Trained volunteers from SNM, CWA, and various other grassroots organisations will hop into specially designed e-trishaws which will take the elderly residents of SNMNH on scenic rides around the Nee Soon and Sembawang neighbourhoods.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2020
    TANJONG PAGAR TOWN COUNCIL Annual Report 2019/2020 Tanjong Pagar Town Council | Annual Report 2019/2020 Tanjong Pagar Town Council Audited Financial Statements, Auditor’s Report and Annual Report for FY 2019/2020 S. 107 of 2021 12 March 2021 Contents Page Chairman's Message 3 主席的话 4 Amanat Pengerusi 7 தலைவ쏍 செயத鎿 8 Composition and Structure 10 Financial Statements 11 - 53 1 Tanjong Pagar Town Council | Annual Report 2019/2020 Chairman’s Message Dear Residents, I hope that you are staying well during these trying times. COVID-19 has been a test of our social fabric, and our strong collective response is testament to the strong community bonds that we have fostered over the years. But the fight against the pandemic will be long, and I hope that everyone continues to remain vigilant. In recent months, Tanjong Pagar Town Council has been working hard to ensure that our neighbourhoods remain a safe space for all, while preparing to further improve our estates in the coming years. Initiatives such as increasing the frequency of cleaning and disinfecting of common areas, observing safe distancing and crowd control at markets are some of the precautionary measures taken by our Town Council’s frontline workers. We also launched our new Town Council 5-year Masterplan. In the coming years, one of our key focus areas is to enhance the biodiversity within our Town so that our residents can enjoy more green spaces in their neighbourhoods for recreation and leisure activities. Cleanliness of our estates will continue to be an important focus, and we will work with you to make our Town one of the cleanest estates in Singapore.
    [Show full text]
  • New Cabinet Full
    BT Infographics The new Cabinet and other office holders PRIME MINISTER’S OFFICE Prime DPM and Coordinating DPM and Coordinating Coordinating Minister Minister, PMO Minister, PMO Minister Minister for Minister for Economic for Infrastructure and Ng Chee Meng, 49 Indranee Rajah, 55 Lee Hsien Loong, 66 National Security and Social Policies Minister for Transport Teo Chee Hean, 63 Tharman Shanmugaratnam, 61 Khaw Boon Wan, 65 DEFENCE HOME AFFAIRS FOREIGN AFFAIRS FINANCE LAW TRANSPORT NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT Minister Heng Swee Keat, 57 Minister Minister Second Minister Minister Second Minister Minister Second Ng Eng Hen, 59 K Shanmugam, Minister Vivian K Shanmugam, Minister Khaw Boon Wan, 65 Lawrence Minister 59 Josephine Balakrishnan, 57 59 Indranee Wong, 45 Desmond Teo, 49 Rajah, 55 Lee, 41 I Senior Minister of State (until June 30 I Senior Minister of State I Senior Minister Mohamad Maliki Bin 2018) Lam Pin Min, 48 of State I Senior Parliamentary Osman, 52 Heng Chee How, 56 Secretary I Senior Minister of State I Minister of State I Minister of State I Senior Minister Amrin Amin, 39 Janil Puthucheary, 45 Zaqy Mohamad, 43 I Senior Minister Sam Tan, 59 Second Second of State of State I Senior Parliamentary I Senior Parliamentary Minister Minister Edwin Tong, 48 I Senior Parliamentary I Senior Parliamentary Mohamad Maliki Bin Secretary Secretary Lawrence Indranee (with effect from Secretary Secretary Osman, 52 Sun Xueling, 39 Tan Wu Meng, 43 Wong, 45 Rajah, 55 July 1 2018) Baey Yam Keng, 47 Sun Xueling, 39 MANPOWER TRADE AND INDUSTRY HEALTH EDUCATION
    [Show full text]
  • Ministers and Mps Dressed in Uniquely Singaporean NDP Attire, Designed in Collaboration with Local Designers
    Source: Lianhe Zaobao © Singapore Press Holdings Limited. 11 Aug 2018, Page 6 Permission required for reproduction Ministers and MPs dressed in uniquely Singaporean NDP attire, designed in collaboration with local designers When the Ministers and MPs made their entrance during this year’s NDP, those who were watching the proceedings may have noticed that quite a number of them were wearing red and white outfits with local designs. Ms Sim Ann, Senior Minister of State, Ministry of Communications and Information & Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth, is the one who introduced her colleagues to these locally-designed clothes. Mr Desmond Lee, Minister for Social and Family Development, wore a piece designed by Eileen Yap, 43, in collaboration with special needs teenagers. Eileen is the founder of “Singapore Fashion Runway”, a local social enterprise. The shirt’s design is based on Singapore’s national flower, the Vanda Miss Joaquim orchid. In a Facebook post of himself wearing the customised costume, Mr Desmond Lee urged the public to support those with special needs through meaningful ways such as this. In fact, Mr Desmond Lee wasn’t alone in wearing works made by those with special needs at NDP. According to Eileen, the floral designs were drawn by Amirul and Farhana, students from the Mountbatten Vocational School. Singapore Fashion Runway then used their designs to produce the clothes. Source: Lianhe Zaobao © Singapore Press Holdings Limited. 11 Aug 2018, Page 6 Permission required for reproduction Other than supporting those with special needs, some Ministers also utilised the works of local artists to showcase unique local styles.
    [Show full text]