DOCSLIB.ORG

Aucun Titre De Diapositive

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aucun Titre De Diapositive Astrophysics & Cosmology Erik Elfgren Lecture 8 Large scale sctructures 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey Large scale structures Clusters . Galaxies are not scattered randomly throughout the universe . Galaxies are found in clusters, such as our Local group (with 3 galaxies and some 45 dwarf galaxies) . Galaxy clusters are group together in super clusters, such as the Virgo cluster, where the Milky way resides (with some 2000 galaxies) . The majority of space contains no galaxies at all and these spaces are called voids Large scale structures Clusters Large scale structures The local group 3-D map of the Local group Large scale structures The local group Most of the galaxies in the local group (distances to scale) Large scale structures The local group Neighbors Maffei 1 group . Mafei 1: Large elliptical galaxy . 5 Mpc away . Dim reddish glow clouded by disk dust Sculptor group . Sculptor galaxy: intermediate spiral . 4 Mpc away . Weakly bound M81 group . Contains M81 and M82 . 3.6 Mpc away Centaurus A / M83 group . One or two groups . 3.7 Mpc away Large scale structures Galaxy dynamics . The local group is dynamical . Galaxy group Maffei 1 have belonged to the Local group . The LMC & SMC have The most prominent galaxies in the belonged to Andromeda Local group (sizes to scale) and will merge with us . Andromeda and the Milky way will collide in 2–7×109 years Large scale structures Galaxy dynamics Galaxy mergers . Stars do not collide . The gravitational potential becomes chaotic towards the end and the orbits of the stars become random . The galaxy resulting from a merger of to similar The Antennæ galaxies galaxies is an elliptical . 1000-fold star formation Large scale structures Galaxy dynamics Gravitationally bound? . Recent research shows that all apparent groups are not bound . 10–50% of the apparent galaxies are only passing . The results are based on N-body simulations of An N-body simulation something like our local group (16,8×106 particles) Large scale structures Galaxy dynamics Collision of Andromeda and Milky way . Andromeda larger but less massive . Approaching with the speed 120 km/s Artist’s impression of the view of the merger from the . Transverse speed not well Earth known, ~ 100 km/s (certainly < 200 km/s) . Most likely, the solar system would be unaffected Large scale structures Superclusters Virgo . 100 groups . 2000 galaxies . 200 Mly 15 . 10 M . Pulls us in Large scale structures Superclusters Evolution Coma . Thousands of galaxies . 99 Mpc away . Old cluster . Numerous ellipticals Large scale structures Superclusters Evolution The Hercules cluster . Part of supercluster . 100 galaxies . 175 Mpc away . Young cluster . Numerous spirals . Mergers in middle and bottom left Large scale structures Structures At close range, gravitational attraction overcomes the Hubble explansion: . We see a peculiar velocity (=deviation from Hubble law) . The universe expands but locally galaxies attract each other Peculiar velocities of nearby galaxies . Measurements out to 100 Mpc Large scale structures Structures The structure began with slight enhancements in the density of matter in the early Universe: t=0,21 Gy . These regions became protogalactic clouds, then collapsed into galaxies t=1,0 Gy . Individual galaxies fell in towards each other to form clusters and then superclusters t=13,6 Gy . DM crucial influence Large scale structures Structures On scales of ~ 50 Mpc we see structures, such as: . Filaments . Walls . Voids On scales > 500 Mpc the universe seems homogeneous and isotropic Large scale structures Structures 2dF sky survey . 221 283 galaxies . Max distance: 1,29 Gpc Large scale structures Structures Sloan sky survey . ~800 000 galaxies . Normal galaxies + Luminous Red Galaxies . Max distance: 2,03 Gpc . Objective: 100 000 000 galaxies Large scale structures Structures Filaments . Gravitationally bound galaxies . Threadlike structure . Length: 100 Mpc . Boundaries between the voids Large scale structures Structures Walls CfA2 Great wall . 250 Mpc long . 100 Mpc wide . 5 Mpc thick . 60 Mpc away Sloan Great wall . 433 Mpc long . 300 Mpc away . Biggest known galactic structure Grus, Fomax, Scultor Large scale structures Structures Voids . Empty spaces between filaments . Largest known structures . 10–150 Mpc radius Large scale structures Structures Voids The WMAP coldspot . 3000 Mpc away . 300 Mpc radius . Discovered from its Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect . Unlikely in the current model of the cosmic evolution ISW effect Large scale structures Cosmological N-body simulations Requirements . Spatial size Hubble volume ~ 5 Gpc . Mass resolution 9 << 10 M Large scale structures Cosmological N-body simulations . Number of particles size of simulation . Put the particles in the box . Only gravity is allowed to affect the evolution . The equations of motion are solved for the particles as the time evolves . Snapshots are saved every once in a while Large scale structures Cosmological N-body simulations Millennium simulation . Size: 2 billion ly . Particles: 10 billion . Resulted in some 20 million galaxies Large scale structures Cosmological N-body simulations Horizon simulation . Size: 2 billion ly . Particles: 4096^3 . Resolution: Milky way has 100 particles.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Orders of Magnitude (Length) - Wikipedia
    03/08/2018 Orders of magnitude (length) - Wikipedia Orders of magnitude (length) The following are examples of orders of magnitude for different lengths. Contents Overview Detailed list Subatomic Atomic to cellular Cellular to human scale Human to astronomical scale Astronomical less than 10 yoctometres 10 yoctometres 100 yoctometres 1 zeptometre 10 zeptometres 100 zeptometres 1 attometre 10 attometres 100 attometres 1 femtometre 10 femtometres 100 femtometres 1 picometre 10 picometres 100 picometres 1 nanometre 10 nanometres 100 nanometres 1 micrometre 10 micrometres 100 micrometres 1 millimetre 1 centimetre 1 decimetre Conversions Wavelengths Human-defined scales and structures Nature Astronomical 1 metre Conversions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orders_of_magnitude_(length) 1/44 03/08/2018 Orders of magnitude (length) - Wikipedia Human-defined scales and structures Sports Nature Astronomical 1 decametre Conversions Human-defined scales and structures Sports Nature Astronomical 1 hectometre Conversions Human-defined scales and structures Sports Nature Astronomical 1 kilometre Conversions Human-defined scales and structures Geographical Astronomical 10 kilometres Conversions Sports Human-defined scales and structures Geographical Astronomical 100 kilometres Conversions Human-defined scales and structures Geographical Astronomical 1 megametre Conversions Human-defined scales and structures Sports Geographical Astronomical 10 megametres Conversions Human-defined scales and structures Geographical Astronomical 100 megametres 1 gigametre
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2007.04414V1 [Astro-Ph.CO] 8 Jul 2020 Bution of Matter on Large Scales Is Inferred from Tion)
    Key words: large scale structure of universe | galaxies: distances and redshifts Draft version July 10, 2020 Typeset using LATEX preprint2 style in AASTeX62 Cosmicflows-3: The South Pole Wall Daniel Pomarede,` 1 R. Brent Tully,2 Romain Graziani,3 Hel´ ene` M. Courtois,4 Yehuda Hoffman,5 and Jer´ emy´ Lezmy4 1Institut de Recherche sur les Lois Fondamentales de l'Univers, CEA Universit´eParis-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France 2Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA 3Laboratoire de Physique de Clermont, Universit Clermont Auvergne, Aubire, France 4University of Lyon, UCB Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IUF, IP2I Lyon, France 5Racah Institute of Physics, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, 91904 Israel ABSTRACT Velocity and density field reconstructions of the volume of the universe within 0:05c derived from the Cosmicflows-3 catalog of galaxy distances has revealed the presence of a filamentary structure extending across ∼ 0:11c. The structure, at a characteristic redshift of 12,000 km s−1, has a density peak coincident with the celestial South Pole. This structure, the largest contiguous feature in the local volume and comparable to the Sloan Great Wall at half the distance, is given the name the South Pole Wall. 1. INTRODUCTION ble of measurements: to a first approximation The South Pole Wall rivals the Sloan Great Vpec = Vobs − H0d. Although uncertainties with Wall in extent, at a distance a factor two individual galaxies are large, the analysis bene- closer. The iconic structures that have trans- fits from the long range correlated nature of the formed our understanding of large scale struc- cosmic flow, allowing the reconstruction of the ture have come from the observed distribution 3D velocity field from noisy, finite and incom- of galaxies assembled from redshift surveys: the plete data (Zaroubi et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Map of the Huge-LQG Noted by Black Circles, Adjacent to the ClowesCampusan O LQG in Red Crosses
    Huge-LQG From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Map of Huge-LQG Quasar 3C 273 Above: Map of the Huge-LQG noted by black circles, adjacent to the ClowesCampusan o LQG in red crosses. Map is by Roger Clowes of University of Central Lancashire . Bottom: Image of the bright quasar 3C 273. Each black circle and red cross on the map is a quasar similar to this one. The Huge Large Quasar Group, (Huge-LQG, also called U1.27) is a possible structu re or pseudo-structure of 73 quasars, referred to as a large quasar group, that measures about 4 billion light-years across. At its discovery, it was identified as the largest and the most massive known structure in the observable universe, [1][2][3] though it has been superseded by the Hercules-Corona Borealis Great Wa ll at 10 billion light-years. There are also issues about its structure (see Dis pute section below). Contents 1 Discovery 2 Characteristics 3 Cosmological principle 4 Dispute 5 See also 6 References 7 Further reading 8 External links Discovery[edit] Roger G. Clowes, together with colleagues from the University of Central Lancash ire in Preston, United Kingdom, has reported on January 11, 2013 a grouping of q uasars within the vicinity of the constellation Leo. They used data from the DR7 QSO catalogue of the comprehensive Sloan Digital Sky Survey, a major multi-imagi ng and spectroscopic redshift survey of the sky. They reported that the grouping was, as they announced, the largest known structure in the observable universe. The structure was initially discovered in November 2012 and took two months of verification before its announcement.
    [Show full text]
  • Consistent Young Earth Relativistic Cosmology
    The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism Volume 8 Print Reference: Pages 14-35 Article 23 2018 Consistent Young Earth Relativistic Cosmology Phillip W. Dennis Unaffiliated Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings Part of the Cosmology, Relativity, and Gravity Commons DigitalCommons@Cedarville provides a publication platform for fully open access journals, which means that all articles are available on the Internet to all users immediately upon publication. However, the opinions and sentiments expressed by the authors of articles published in our journals do not necessarily indicate the endorsement or reflect the views of DigitalCommons@Cedarville, the Centennial Library, or Cedarville University and its employees. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their work. Please address questions to [email protected]. Browse the contents of this volume of The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism. Recommended Citation Dennis, P.W. 2018. Consistent young earth relativistic cosmology. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Creationism, ed. J.H. Whitmore, pp. 14–35. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Creation Science Fellowship. Dennis, P.W. 2018. Consistent young earth relativistic cosmology. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Creationism, ed. J.H. Whitmore, pp. 14–35. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Creation Science Fellowship. CONSISTENT YOUNG EARTH RELATIVISTIC COSMOLOGY Phillip W. Dennis, 1655 Campbell Avenue,
    [Show full text]
  • The Excess Density of Field Galaxies Near Z ∼ 0.56 Around the Gamma
    The Excess Density of Field Galaxies near z ∼ 0.56 around the Gamma-Ray Burst GRB 021004 Position I. V. Sokolov,1, * A. J. Castro-Tirado,2 O. P. Zhelenkova,3, 4 I. A. Solovyev,5 O. V. Verkhodanov,3 and V. V. Sokolov3 1Institute of Astronomy, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119017 Russia 2Stellar Physics Department, Institute for Astrophysics of Andalucia (IAA-CSIC), Granada, 18008 Spain 3Special Astrophysical Observatory, Russian Academy of Sciences, Nizhnii Arkhyz, 369167 Russia 4ITMO University, St. Petersburg, 197101 Russia 5Astronomical Department, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, 199034 Russia We test for reliability any signatures of field galaxies clustering in the GRB 021004 line of sight. The first signature is the GRB 021004 field photometric redshifts distribution based on the 6-m telescope of the Special Astrophysical Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences observations with a peak near z ∼ 0.56 estimated from multicolor photometry in the GRB direction. The second signature is the Mg IIλλ2796, 2803A˚A˚ absorption doublet at z ≈ 0.56 in VLT/UVES spectra obtained for the GRB 021004 afterglow. The third signature is the galaxy clustering in a larger (of about 3◦ × 3◦) area around GRB021004 with an effective peak near z ∼ 0.56 for both the spectral and photometric redshifts from a few catalogs of clusters based on the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) as a part of SDSS-III. From catalog data the size of the whole inhomogeneity in distribution of the galaxy clusters with the peak near z ≈ 0.56 is also estimated as about 6◦–8◦ or 140–190 Mpc.
    [Show full text]
  • Sloan Great Wall By: Eric Parker What Is the Sloan Great Wall?
    Sloan Great Wall By: Eric Parker What is the Sloan Great Wall? - The Sloan Great Wall is group of superclusters connected by filaments of galaxies in deep space 1.4 billion light years long - The wall is the third largest object in our universe - The wall stretches for about 5% of the observable universe - Composed of: - Superclusters - Filaments - Voids What is a Supercluster? - A supercluster is a group of about 3-10 clusters - It can range up to 100 light years wide Clusters - Clusters are bunches of galaxies - They are anywhere from 50 to 2000 galaxies big - They can range from 6.17x10^19 km to 3x10^20km Filaments - Thread like structures that connect clusters together - They contain single galaxies and groups Voids -Cloud of dust and gas that absorbs all light from background stars -Likely place for new stars to form -Possible to see through it with infrared - Space with nothing in it Dark Matter in the wall - Thought to have been born from dark matter - The Sloan Great Wall could be a resting place for dark matter - Dark matter is matter in space that we can’t see - Thought to be composed of WIMPS (weak interacting massive particles) - When lots of them are together their mass creates lots of gravity - Dark matter attracts normal matter - All the galaxies were then attached to it Picture of Dark Matter Force of Gravity m1= Mass of the WIMPS m2= Mass of a visible mass r= distance between m1 and m2 Fg= Force of gravity G= gravitational constant How do we know this? - A process called gravitational lensing is able to prove the existence
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmic Homogeneity As Standard Ruler Pierros Ntelis
    Cosmic Homogeneity as standard ruler Pierros Ntelis Collaborators: J. Rich .97 J.C. Hamilton )=2 H ( J.M. Le Goff 2 R A.Ealet D S. Escoffier A.J. Hawken A. Tilquin Post Doc Aix-Marseille University, CPPM P. Ntelis 2nd Colloque National DE, October 2018 s. 1 Cosmic Homogeneity as standard ruler What can fractality tell us about the universe? Romansco Broccoli, Italy since 16th c. ) Simulation (<r Angulo et al (2008) N r ln ln d d )= Euclid (r 2 eBOSS LSST DESI D P. Ntelis 2nd Colloque National DE, October 2018 s. 2 Cosmic Homogeneity as standard ruler Outline ΛCDM Phenomenology Challenges of Cosmological Principle Standard Rulers and Candles Homogeneity scale as a standard Ruler Conclusion and Outlook P. Ntelis 2nd Colloque National DE, October 2018 s. 3 Cosmic Homogeneity as standard ruler Statistical On enough Standard Homogeneity Cosmological Principle = large Phenomenology ΛCDM + scales Isotropy Non Homogeneous + Isotropic Homogeneous + Isotropic M.Stolpovskiy P. Ntelis 2nd Colloque National DE, October 2018 s. 4 Cosmic Homogeneity as standard ruler Standard 4 4 R Least EH = c d xp g Phenomenology ΛCDM S − 16⇡G Action Z Principle Gµ⌫ Tµ⌫ Metric Ansatz / Perturbed g g¯ + δg Einstein-Boltzmann µ⌫ ' µ⌫ µ⌫ Equations + X, Cosmic Components, (b,CDM,DE,…) δf (~x, p,~ t)= [δf (~x, p,~ t)] Dt X C X 8 coupled non linear differential P. Ntelis 2nd Colloque National DE, October 2018 s. 5 Cosmic Homogeneity as standard ruler 5 % 26 % 69 % Perturbed Planck SDSS 2018 ++ Equations Boltzmann-Einstein Cosmological Principle Homogeneous + Isotropic P. Ntelis 2nd Colloque National DE, October 2018 s.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing the Homogeneity of the Universe Using Gamma-Ray Bursts⋆
    A&A 582, A111 (2015) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525736 & c ESO 2015 Astrophysics Testing the homogeneity of the Universe using gamma-ray bursts Ming-Hua Li1 and Hai-Nan Lin2 1 Institute of Astronomy and Space Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, 510275 Guangzhou, PR China e-mail: [limh;linhn]@ihep.ac.cn 2 Department of Physics, Chongqing University, 401331 Chongqing, PR China Received 26 January 2015 / Accepted 29 July 2015 ABSTRACT Aims. The discovery of a statistically significant clustering in the distribution of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) has recently been reported. Given that the cluster has a characteristic size of 2000–3000 Mpc and a redshift between 1.6 ≤ z ≤ 2.1, it has been claimed that this structure is incompatible with the cosmological principle of homogeneity and isotropy of our Universe. In this paper, we study the homogeneity of the GRB distribution using a subsample of the Greiner GRB catalogue, which contains 314 objects with red- shift 0 < z < 2.5 (244 of them discovered by the Swift GRB mission). We try to reconcile the dilemma between the new observations and the current theory of structure formation and growth. Methods. To test the results against the possible biases in redshift determination and the incompleteness of the Greiner sample, we also apply our analysis to the 244 GRBs discovered by Swift and the subsample presented by the Swift Gamma-Ray Burst Host Galaxy Legacy Survey (SHOALS). The real space two-point correlation function (2PCF) of GRBs, ξ(r), is calculated using a Landy-Szalay estimator. We perform a standard least-χ2 fit to the measured 2PCFs of GRBs.
    [Show full text]
  • August Meetings Comet NEOWISE C/2020 F3
    July, 2020 August MeetingsJuly, 2020 The Milwaukee Astronomical Society is on the summer schedule. There will be no Membership Meetings in the summer months of June, July, and August. However, there will be a Board Meeting on August 10th, the second Monday of the month starting at 7PM. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic the meeting will be held through Zoom videocon- ference. The Board Meetings are open to the membership and everybody is welcome to attend who is interested in organizational and Observatory related issues. If you are not Inside this issue: a Board member but would like to attend please contact Tamas Kriska. The Astrophotography Focus Group will meet on Wednesday, August 12th at 7 PM August Meetings 1 trough Zoom videoconference. The specific topic of the meeting will be announced on the Google Group. Comet Neowise 1 The First Wednesday How to Meeting will also be held through Zoom videoconfer- st Minutes 2 ence on August 5 , from 7:30 PM. The MAS Google Group is as active as ever. Learn about the astronomical news, fol- Treasurer Report 2 low equipment related discussions, or just check out the latest images taken by fellow Observatory Direc- 2 Club members. tor Report Membership 2 Comet NEOWISE C/2020 F3 Comet NEOWISE 3 In the News 5 This month we had an Adopt a Scope 6 unexpected celestial visi- tor, the brightest comet Officers/Staff 6 in the northern hemi- Keyholders 6 sphere since Comet Hale –Bopp in 1997. The C/2020 F3, a long period comet with a near- parabolic orbit was dis- covered on March 27 during the NEOWISE mission of the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) space telescope.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Cosmic Bulk Flows with Type Ia Supernovae from The
    A&A 560, A90 (2013) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321880 & c ESO 2013 Astrophysics Measuring cosmic bulk flows with Type Ia supernovae from the Nearby Supernova Factory U. Feindt1, M. Kerschhaggl1 M. Kowalski1, G. Aldering2, P. Antilogus3, C. Aragon2, S. Bailey2, C. Baltay4, S. Bongard3, C. Buton1, A. Canto3, F. Cellier-Holzem3, M. Childress5, N. Chotard6, Y. Copin6, H. K. Fakhouri2;7, E. Gangler6, J. Guy3, A. Kim2, P. Nugent8;9, J. Nordin2;10, K. Paech1, R. Pain3, E. Pecontal11, R. Pereira6, S. Perlmutter2;7, D. Rabinowitz4, M. Rigault6, K. Runge2, C. Saunders2, R. Scalzo5, G. Smadja6, C. Tao12;13, R. C. Thomas8, B. A. Weaver14, and C. Wu3;15 1 Physikalisches Institut, Universität Bonn, Nußallee 12, 53115 Bonn, Germany e-mail: [feindt;mkersch]@physik.uni-bonn.de 2 Physics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 3 Laboratoire de Physique Nucléaire et des Hautes Énergies, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 6, Université Paris Diderot Paris 7, CNRS-IN2P3, 4 place Jussieu, 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France 4 Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06250-8121, USA 5 Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Australian National University, ACT 2611 Canberra, Australia 6 Université de Lyon, Université de Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, CNRS/IN2P3, Institut de Physique Nucléaire de Lyon, 69622 Lyon, France 7 Department of Physics, University of California Berkeley, 366 LeConte Hall MC 7300, Berkeley, CA 94720-7300, USA 8 Computational Cosmology Center, Computational Research Division,
    [Show full text]
  • Compatibility of the Large Quasar Groups with the Concordance Cosmological Model
    Article Compatibility of the large quasar groups with the concordance cosmological model Clowes, Roger G Available at http://clok.uclan.ac.uk/14991/ Clowes, Roger G ORCID: 0000-0001-8370-465X (2016) Compatibility of the large quasar groups with the concordance cosmological model. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 461 (3). pp. 2267-2281. ISSN 0035- 8711 It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1513 For more information about UCLan’s research in this area go to http://www.uclan.ac.uk/researchgroups/ and search for <name of research Group>. For information about Research generally at UCLan please go to http://www.uclan.ac.uk/research/ All outputs in CLoK are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including Copyright law. Copyright, IPR and Moral Rights for the works on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the policies page. CLoK Central Lancashire online Knowledge www.clok.uclan.ac.uk MNRAS 461, 2267–2281 (2016) doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1513 Advance Access publication 2016 June 26 Compatibility of the large quasar groups with the concordance cosmological model Gabriel E. Marinello,1‹ Roger G. Clowes,1 Luis E. Campusano,2 Gerard M. Williger,1,3 Ilona K. Sochting¨ 4 and Matthew J. Graham5 1Jeremiah Horrocks Institute, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK 2Observatorio Astronomico´ Cerro Calan,´ Departamento de Astronom´ıa, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 36-D, 7591245 Santiago, Chile 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, University Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA 4Astrophysics, Denys Wilkinson Building, Keble Road, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RH, UK 5California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA Accepted 2016 June 21.
    [Show full text]
  • A Map of the Universe
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Title A map of the universe Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7s24r37m Authors Gott III, J. Richard Juric, Mario Schlegel, David et al. Publication Date 2003-10-20 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Draft v3.0 A Map of the Universe J. Richard Gott, III, 1 Mario Juri´c, 1 David Schlegel, 1 Fiona Hoyle, 2 Michael Vogeley, 2 Max Tegmark, 3 Neta Bahcall, 1 Jon Brinkmann 4 ABSTRACT We have produced a new conformal map of the universe illustrating recent discov- eries, ranging from Kuiper belt objects in the Solar system, to the galaxies and quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. This map projection, based on the logarithm map of the complex plane, preserves shapes locally, and yet is able to display the entire range of astronomical scales from the Earth’s neighborhood to the cosmic microwave background. The conformal nature of the projection, preserving shapes locally, may be of particular use for analyzing large scale structure. Prominent in the map is a Sloan Great Wall of galaxies 1.37 billion light years long, 80% longer than the Great Wall discovered by Geller and Huchra and therefore the largest observed structure in the universe. Subject headings: clusters: cosmology, large scale structure, stars, kuiper belt objects 1. Introduction Cartographers mapping the Earth’s surface were faced with the challenge of mapping a curved surface onto a plane. No such projection can be perfect, but it can capture important features. Perhaps the most famous map projection is the Mercator projection (presented by Gerhardus arXiv:astro-ph/0310571 v1 20 Oct 2003 Mercator in 1569).
    [Show full text]