DOCSLIB.ORG

SR 52(8) 44-47.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SR 52(8) 44-47.Pdf PARESH R. VAIDYA August 2015 marks the 70th anniversary of the RTICLE A atomic bombings. Here’s an attempt to unravel whether the Germans were EATURE anywhere close to F an atomic bomb. While some wanted to exploit control of the US army. Apart from uranium fi ssion and the possibility intelligence experts from the military, of chain reaction for building a Super six scientists also were attached to Alsos. Bomb, others like Frederic Joliot Curie The scientifi c component of the mission OMETHING unusual happened in and his team thought of peaceful use was overseen by Samuel Goudsmit, the S1945, when the Nobel Prizes were like a controlled chain reaction in a Dutch physicist who discovered electron announced that winter. No one seemed nuclear reactor. If Britain, France and spin, and had since migrated to America. to know the whereabouts of the physics America could think of an explosive, so The headquarter of the mission was in prize winner, the German radiochemist could German scientists under Hitler’s England Otto Hahn. He was to be given the prize rule. With this assumption, labs in the Alsos had three target areas – Italy, for 1944 because the ceremony could not Allied countries put a moratorium on France and Germany. Italy was cleared be held that year due to the World War. the publication of scientifi c results on at the early stage itself of any suspicion. He was not found in Kaiser Wilhelm uranium and fi ssion. France was on the list in spite of being an Institute (KWI) in Berlin Dahlem, where But the censorship was causing Allied country because it was occupied he worked last. In fact, the Institute more worry. The results from the Italian by Germany early in the war and its labs itself was in a shambles, structurally and and German labs were also not coming were populated by German scientists, administratively, due to the War. out. The free world countries, who were may be by force. As the German labs were The 65-year-old scientist was under surely working on development of the damaged by the allied bombing, they had house arrest somewhere in England. nuclear weapon were under constant found France a safe place to work. He had for company two more Nobel pressure; their obvious fear was, In November 1944 Alsos could enter laureates from his country, the famous whether Germany was ahead of them France when the advancing allied army crystallographer Max von Laue and in pursuit of the nuclear weapon? After forced the Germans to retreat. They quantum physicist Werner Heisenberg. all, fi ssion was discovered in Germany, interviewed Frederic Joliot, son-in law of Seven more scientists who were associa- the only uranium mines in Europe, Marie Curie, who was the head at College ted with the German nuclear programme in Czechoslovakia, were captured by de France in Paris. He admitted that were also there. Hitler in 1939 and the only source of some German scientists indeed visited heavy water, Norsk Hydro, was also or worked in his laboratory. Two of his The War Scenario with him since Norway was taken visiting Germans, Diebner and Bagge During the 1930s, events on the political over. And of course, he had bright were later arrested when Alsos could front and in nuclear science were playing scientists. enter Germany. Incidentally, these two out parallely. Neutron was discovered in were also the members of the National Britain in 1932 and Hitler rose to power in Mission Alsos Socialist (Nazi) party. Prof. Friedrich von Germany in 1933. In January 1939 nuclear Out of this fear psychosis was born a Weizsacker, a disciple of Heisenberg, fi ssion was established in Germany and systematic reconnaissance programme was also in France during the occupation by September the war broke out in the in 1943, titled ‘Mission Alsos’. This was a years. Alsos men found his technical European part of the world. Like the two natural outcome for a project controlled papers sealed in a metal drum and camps in the battle fi eld, science also got by an army; the ‘Manhattan project’ dumped in a cesspool behind his house in divided into two. to build a super bomb was under the Germany. SCIENCE REPORTER, AUGUST 2015 44 FEATURE ARTICLE Above: Farm Hall ascertain the status of their knowledge where the German and if Germany indeed had plans to make scientists were kept in a bomb. detention A doubt has been expressed whether the scientists were aware of the recording The Hiroshima and so talked only in a sanitized manner. bomb was made However, this appeared unlikely from the of enriched nature of their discussions. It is not likely that ten persons could fake emotions 24x uranium. They 7 for six months. Consider this dialogue also knew the that happened: general principles Diebner: “I wonder whether there are of such a weapon. microphones installed here?” Heisenberg: “Microphones installed? Between 24th April to 3rd May 1945, were fi tted with hidden microphones. (Laughter) Oh, no, they’re not as cute Alsos located ten scientists one by one This part of the mission to record and as all that. I don’t think they know the from different places in Germany. The transcribe what they talked and then real Gestapo methods; they’re a bit old- last to be had was Heisenberg from his put the threads together was nicknamed fashioned in that respect.” home in Urfeld. He had reached there ‘Operation Epsilon’. It would also record That they were not pretending only two days back from Haigerloch, the the status of knowledge in nuclear fi eld in innocence came out clearly when the new location of his Institute, the KWI. His Germany. news of the Hiroshima bomb reached wife Elisabeth recounts in her book (Inner One may wonder, what was the use them on the 6th of August 1945. Like Exile,1980) that she was frightened seeing of fl ogging a dead horse? Germany was many people in the world outside, they fi ve soldiers, thinking they were Hitler’s nearly defeated when these scientists too did not believe it at fi rst. However, army men, but was relieved to know that were quarantined. The real reason was the disbelief was slowly worn out in two they were Americans! To get Heisenberg alarming. America did not want these days, when another atom bomb exploded (and also Hahn), the Chief of Alsos, scientists to land in the hands of Russian over Nagasaki. Colonel Pash and Goudsmit themselves troops, when Germany fell. Even before The most affected by the news was had gone to their residences. Heisenberg the war was over, or the nuclear weapon Otto Hahn, who blamed himself for this told them, “I have been waiting for you”. was proved to exist, USA was thinking devastating loss of innocent lives because He should have been, because three days of competition the USSR could provide he had discovered nuclear fi ssion. He was back, on 30th April, Hitler had killed them in the nuclear fi eld! This was the so delirious that he needed a constant himself and the great Third Reich was on seed for the cold war. companion to watch over him, lest he way to surrender soon. harm himself. Walther Gerlach, the The convoy of scientists was taken Transcripts administrative head at the Reich Research fi rst to Versaeilles, Le Vesinet (both in The Farm Hall where they were kept Council, overseeing the war work in France) and Huy in Belgium. The fi nal in house arrest had two army offi cers Germany, was also heard sobbing in his destination was Godmanchester near (Captain Brodie and Major Rittner) to room. His grief was about his failure as Cambridge in UK. The two storied villa look after their needs, both very polite. As a General. It was Hahn’s turn to console was called the Farm Hall. While they were they all spoke German, the tape recording him. He said, “Are you upset that we in custody of the British army, the aim was transcribed in German language did not make the uranium bomb? I thank was to fi nd out what they did in the past and then translated into English for the God on my bended knees that we did not two years in their laboratories. Was there seniors to review. These transcripts can be make it. Or are you upset that Americans still a danger from Germany? Their rooms considered reasonably reliable material to could do it better than we could?” 45 SCIENCE REPORTER, AUGUST 2015 FEATURE ARTICLE Left: The atomic bomb, nicknamed Little Boy, Heisenberg, how does a bomb explode. that was dropped on Hiroshima This series of discussions demonstrates the strong infl uence of isolation from the also made, but it is not clear if they used outside world! it. They had a good base in Heavy water The fact that Pu bomb uses implosion technology. They were attempting to get technique and the material is compressed criticality in a pile but had not operated a to a great degree and the assembly goes to self-sustaining chain reaction till then, at super critical mode, makes the discussion least as on record. on critical mass relatively less important. It appears surprising that there Although they had experts on explosives, With the help of newspapers they was no discussion or mention of the a couple of them were interned here in knew that the Hiroshima bomb was made letter Paul Harteck wrote to the German Farm Hall, it is clear that they were not of enriched uranium.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bringing out the Dead Alison Abbott Reviews the Story of How a DNA Forensics Team Cracked a Grisly Puzzle
    BOOKS & ARTS COMMENT DADO RUVIC/REUTERS/CORBIS DADO A forensics specialist from the International Commission on Missing Persons examines human remains from a mass grave in Tomašica, Bosnia and Herzegovina. FORENSIC SCIENCE Bringing out the dead Alison Abbott reviews the story of how a DNA forensics team cracked a grisly puzzle. uring nine sweltering days in July Bosnia’s Million Bones tells the story of how locating, storing, pre- 1995, Bosnian Serb soldiers slaugh- innovative DNA forensic science solved the paring and analysing tered about 7,000 Muslim men and grisly conundrum of identifying each bone the million or more Dboys from Srebrenica in Bosnia. They took so that grieving families might find some bones. It was in large them to several different locations and shot closure. part possible because them, or blew them up with hand grenades. This is an important book: it illustrates the during those fate- They then scooped up the bodies with bull- unspeakable horrors of a complex war whose ful days in July 1995, dozers and heavy earth-moving equipment, causes have always been hard for outsiders to aerial reconnais- and dumped them into mass graves. comprehend. The author, a British journalist, sance missions by the Bosnia’s Million It was the single most inhuman massacre has the advantage of on-the-ground knowl- Bones: Solving the United States and the of the Bosnian war, which erupted after the edge of the war and of the International World’s Greatest North Atlantic Treaty break-up of Yugoslavia and lasted from 1992 Commission on Missing Persons (ICMP), an Forensic Puzzle Organization had to 1995, leaving some 100,000 dead.
    [Show full text]
  • Max Planck Institute for the History of Science Werner Heisenberg And
    MAX-PLANCK-INSTITUT FÜR WISSENSCHAFTSGESCHICHTE Max Planck Institute for the History of Science PREPRINT 203 (2002) Horst Kant Werner Heisenberg and the German Uranium Project Otto Hahn and the Declarations of Mainau and Göttingen Werner Heisenberg and the German Uranium Project* Horst Kant Werner Heisenberg’s (1901-1976) involvement in the German Uranium Project is the most con- troversial aspect of his life. The controversial discussions on it go from whether Germany at all wanted to built an atomic weapon or only an energy supplying machine (the last only for civil purposes or also for military use for instance in submarines), whether the scientists wanted to support or to thwart such efforts, whether Heisenberg and the others did really understand the mechanisms of an atomic bomb or not, and so on. Examples for both extreme positions in this controversy represent the books by Thomas Powers Heisenberg’s War. The Secret History of the German Bomb,1 who builds up him to a resistance fighter, and by Paul L. Rose Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project – A Study in German Culture,2 who characterizes him as a liar, fool and with respect to the bomb as a poor scientist; both books were published in the 1990s. In the first part of my paper I will sum up the main facts, known on the German Uranium Project, and in the second part I will discuss some aspects of the role of Heisenberg and other German scientists, involved in this project. Although there is already written a lot on the German Uranium Project – and the best overview up to now supplies Mark Walker with his book German National Socialism and the quest for nuclear power, which was published in * Paper presented on a conference in Moscow (November 13/14, 2001) at the Institute for the History of Science and Technology [àÌÒÚËÚÛÚ ËÒÚÓËË ÂÒÚÂÒÚ‚ÓÁ̇ÌËfl Ë ÚÂıÌËÍË ËÏ.
    [Show full text]
  • Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project, 1939-1945: a Study in German Culture
    Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project http://content.cdlib.org/xtf/view?docId=ft838nb56t&chunk.id=0&doc.v... Preferred Citation: Rose, Paul Lawrence. Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project, 1939-1945: A Study in German Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press, c1998 1998. http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft838nb56t/ Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project A Study in German Culture Paul Lawrence Rose UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS Berkeley · Los Angeles · Oxford © 1998 The Regents of the University of California In affectionate memory of Brian Dalton (1924–1996), Scholar, gentleman, leader, friend And in honor of my father's 80th birthday Preferred Citation: Rose, Paul Lawrence. Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project, 1939-1945: A Study in German Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press, c1998 1998. http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft838nb56t/ In affectionate memory of Brian Dalton (1924–1996), Scholar, gentleman, leader, friend And in honor of my father's 80th birthday ― ix ― ACKNOWLEDGMENTS For hospitality during various phases of work on this book I am grateful to Aryeh Dvoretzky, Director of the Institute of Advanced Studies of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, whose invitation there allowed me to begin work on the book while on sabbatical leave from James Cook University of North Queensland, Australia, in 1983; and to those colleagues whose good offices made it possible for me to resume research on the subject while a visiting professor at York University and the University of Toronto, Canada, in 1990–92. Grants from the College of the Liberal Arts and the Institute for the Arts and Humanistic Studies of The Pennsylvania State University enabled me to complete the research and writing of the book.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: the PRINCIPAL UNCERTAINTY: U.S
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: THE PRINCIPAL UNCERTAINTY: U.S. ATOMIC INTELLIGENCE, 1942-1949 Vincent Jonathan Houghton, Doctor of Philosophy, 2013 Dissertation directed by: Professor Jon T. Sumida Department of History The subject of this dissertation is the U. S. atomic intelligence effort against both Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union in the period 1942-1949. Both of these intelligence efforts operated within the framework of an entirely new field of intelligence: scientific intelligence. Because of the atomic bomb, for the first time in history a nation’s scientific resources – the abilities of its scientists, the state of its research institutions and laboratories, its scientific educational system – became a key consideration in assessing a potential national security threat. Considering how successfully the United States conducted the atomic intelligence effort against the Germans in the Second World War, why was the United States Government unable to create an effective atomic intelligence apparatus to monitor Soviet scientific and nuclear capabilities? Put another way, why did the effort against the Soviet Union fail so badly, so completely, in all potential metrics – collection, analysis, and dissemination? In addition, did the general assessment of German and Soviet science lead to particular assumptions about their abilities to produce nuclear weapons? How did this assessment affect American presuppositions regarding the German and Soviet strategic threats? Despite extensive historical work on atomic intelligence, the current historiography has not adequately addressed these questions. THE PRINCIPAL UNCERTAINTY: U.S. ATOMIC INTELLIGENCE, 1942-1949 By Vincent Jonathan Houghton Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2013 Advisory Committee: Professor Jon T.
    [Show full text]
  • Hitler's Uranium Club, the Secret Recordings at Farm Hall
    HITLER’S URANIUM CLUB DER FARMHALLER NOBELPREIS-SONG (Melodie: Studio of seiner Reis) Detained since more than half a year Ein jeder weiss, das Unglueck kam Sind Hahn und wir in Farm Hall hier. Infolge splitting von Uran, Und fragt man wer is Schuld daran Und fragt man, wer ist Schuld daran, So ist die Antwort: Otto Hahn. So ist die Antwort: Otto Hahn. The real reason nebenbei Die energy macht alles waermer. Ist weil we worked on nuclei. Only die Schweden werden aermer. Und fragt man, wer ist Schuld daran, Und fragt man, wer ist Schuld daran, So ist die Antwort: Otto Hahn. So ist die Antwort: Otto Hahn. Die nuclei waren fuer den Krieg Auf akademisches Geheiss Und fuer den allgemeinen Sieg. Kriegt Deutschland einen Nobel-Preis. Und fragt man, wer ist Schuld daran, Und fragt man, wer ist Schuld daran, So ist die Antwort: Otto Hahn. So ist die Antwort: Otto Hahn. Wie ist das moeglich, fragt man sich, In Oxford Street, da lebt ein Wesen, The story seems wunderlich. Die wird das heut’ mit Thraenen lesen. Und fragt man, wer ist Schuld daran Und fragt man, wer ist Schuld daran, So ist die Antwort: Otto Hahn. So ist die Antwort: Otto Hahn. Die Feldherrn, Staatschefs, Zeitungsknaben, Es fehlte damals nur ein atom, Ihn everyday im Munde haben. Haett er gesagt: I marry you madam. Und fragt man, wer ist Schuld daran, Und fragt man, wer ist Schuld daran, So ist die Antwort: Otto Hahn. So ist die Antwort: Otto Hahn. Even the sweethearts in the world(s) Dies ist nur unsre-erste Feier, Sie nennen sich jetzt: “Atom-girls.” Ich glaub die Sache wird noch teuer, Und fragt man, wer ist Schuld daran, Und fragt man, wer ist Schuld daran, So ist die Antwort: Otto Hahn.
    [Show full text]
  • Farm Hall Transcripts)
    Volume 7. Nazi Germany, 1933-1945 Transcript of Surreptitiously Taped Conversations among German Nuclear Physicists at Farm Hall (August 6-7, 1945) At the beginning of the war, Germany’s leading nuclear physicists were called to the army weapons department. There, as part of the “uranium project” under the direction of Werner Heisenberg, they were charged with determining the extent to which nuclear fission could aid in the war effort. (Nuclear fission had been discovered by Otto Hahn and Lise Meitner in 1938.) Unlike their American colleagues in the Manhattan Project, German physicists did not succeed in building their own nuclear weapon. In June 1942, the researchers informed Albert Speer that they were in no position to build an atomic bomb with the resources at hand in less than 3-5 years, at which point the project was scrapped. After the end of the war, both the Western Allies and the Soviet Union tried to recruit the German scientists for their own purposes. From July 3, 1945, to January 3, 1946, the Allies incarcerated ten German nuclear physicists at the English country estate of Farm Hall, their goal being to obtain information about the German nuclear research project by way of surreptitiously taped conversations. The following transcript includes the scientists’ reactions to reports that America had dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima. The scientists also discuss their relationship to the Nazi regime and offer some prognoses for Germany’s future. As the transcript shows, Otto Hahn was especially shaken by the dropping of the bomb; later, he campaigned against the misuse of nuclear energy for military purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • The German Rocket Jet and the Nuclear Programs of World War II Max Lutze Union College - Schenectady, NY
    Union College Union | Digital Works Honors Theses Student Work 6-2016 The German Rocket Jet and the Nuclear Programs of World War II Max Lutze Union College - Schenectady, NY Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses Part of the European History Commons, German Language and Literature Commons, History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, Military History Commons, and the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation Lutze, Max, "The German Rocket Jet and the Nuclear Programs of World War II" (2016). Honors Theses. 179. https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses/179 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at Union | Digital Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Union | Digital Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The German Rocket, Jet, and Nuclear Programs of World War II By Max Lutze * * * * * * * * * Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Honors in the Department of History UNION COLLEGE March, 2016 2 Abstract German military technology in World War II was among the best of the major warring powers and in many cases it was the groundwork for postwar innovations that permanently changed global warfare. Three of the most important projects undertaken, which were not only German initiatives and therefore perhaps among the most valuable programs for both the major Axis and Allied nations, include the rocket, jet, and nuclear programs. In Germany, each of these technologies was given different levels of attention and met with varying degrees of success in their development and application.
    [Show full text]
  • Bruno Touschek in Germany After the War: 1945-46
    LABORATORI NAZIONALI DI FRASCATI INFN–19-17/LNF October 10, 2019 MIT-CTP/5150 Bruno Touschek in Germany after the War: 1945-46 Luisa Bonolis1, Giulia Pancheri2;† 1)Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Boltzmannstraße 22, 14195 Berlin, Germany 2)INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, P.O. Box 13, I-00044 Frascati, Italy Abstract Bruno Touschek was an Austrian born theoretical physicist, who proposed and built the first electron-positron collider in 1960 in the Frascati National Laboratories in Italy. In this note we reconstruct a crucial period of Bruno Touschek’s life so far scarcely explored, which runs from Summer 1945 to the end of 1946. We shall describe his university studies in Gottingen,¨ placing them in the context of the reconstruction of German science after 1945. The influence of Werner Heisenberg and other prominent German physicists will be highlighted. In parallel, we shall show how the decisions of the Allied powers, towards restructuring science and technology in the UK after the war effort, determined Touschek’s move to the University of Glasgow in 1947. Make it a story of distances and starlight Robert Penn Warren, 1905-1989, c 1985 Robert Penn Warren arXiv:1910.09075v1 [physics.hist-ph] 20 Oct 2019 e-mail: [email protected], [email protected]. Authors’ ordering in this and related works alternates to reflect that this work is part of a joint collaboration project with no principal author. †) Also at Center for Theoretical Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA. Contents 1 Introduction2 2 Hamburg 1945: from death rays to post-war science4 3 German science and the mission of the T-force6 3.1 Operation Epsilon .
    [Show full text]
  • Overhearing Heisenberg
    COMMENT BOOKS & ARTS former Yugoslavia — began excavat- ing the burial sites. They pieced together some evidence of when and how the mass killings had taken place from clues such as the bodies’ states of decay, the times and dates on their self-winding watches, INTERFOTO/AKG-IMAGES and the characteristic patterns of damage caused to skulls by bullets. Analysis of the colours and textures of soils pointed to where some of the bones had first been dumped. For example, chips of glass indicated burial near a glass factory in the area. The task of identifying the bones was exquisitely difficult. The bulldozers had broken up the bodies, and the pieces had been mixed up in the dumper trucks transporting them to new burial sites. DNA analysis of each bone was the only possible method of conclusive identifica- tion, so the ICMP set up its lab. Left to right: Werner Heisenberg, Max von Laue and Otto Hahn in Göttingen, Germany, in 1946. At first, this remarkable operation ran on a shoestring. Members invented PHYSICS cheap alternatives for equipment, such as adapting a chicken rotisserie from the local market to stir DNA solutions. All of these staff (many of them “massively Overhearing Heisenberg adaptable” graduates, Jennings writes) were locals, who could easily commu- Ann Finkbeiner ponders a script inspired by the 1945 nicate with the traumatized relatives of internment of eminent German physicists in England. the missing. This helped them to collect the blood samples for the DNA analysis needed for comparison with DNA from y July 1945, the Allies and Germans had Farm Hall the Germans came to the bones.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Epsilon: Science, History, and Theatrical Narrative
    Operation Epsilon: Science, History, and Theatrical Narrative The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Brody, Alan. “Operation Epsilon: Science, History, and Theatrical Narrative.” Narrative 19.2 (2011): 253–257. As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/nar.2011.0016 Publisher Muse - Johns Hopkins University Press Version Author's final manuscript Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/77911 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ OPERATION EPSILON: SCIENCE, HISTORY AND THEATRICAL NARRATIVE ALAN BRODY In 1945, shortly after VE day, the Anglo-American forces rounded up ten renowned nuclear scientists and interned them at Farm Hall, an estate near Cambridge, England. All the rooms on the estate had been bugged. The conversations of the scientists were recorded on wax discs and translated. Information regarding the scientists’ research and anything else that might be of interest to the Anglo-American military was sent to Washington and London. The internship lasted from July to January. During that time, America dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki and Otto Hahn was awarded the Nobel Prize for his discovery of fission. The men’s responses to those events are a part of the transcript. The entire operation had the code name Operation Epsilon. The full transcripts were declassified only in 1993. They were published in England under the title Operation Epsilon: The Farm Hall Transcripts and in the states as Hitler’s Uranium Club , superbly edited by Jeremy Bernstein.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting Farm Hall [DOI: 10.1051 /Epn:2 007015 ]
    features Revisiting Farm Hall [DOI: 10.1051 /epn:2 007015 ] Amand A. Lucas , Université de Namur, Belgium and Académie Royale de Belgique n his book Hitler’s Scientists , writer John Cornwell [1] relates ample, in a detailed paper entitled “ Research in Germany on Ia pilgrimage style visit, in November 2002, to a mansion the Technical Application of Atomic Energy ” written in 1947 named Farm Hall, near Cambridge (UK), by a small party of for Die Naturwissenschaften and translated for Nature [12], science historians, Heisenberg scholars, and other writers. Farm Heisenberg states in the opening paragraphs: “I n view of the Hall had served as a detention house for a group of ten nuclear possibility that England and the United States might undertake academics and other scientists captured in Germany at the the development of atomic weapons, the Heereswaffenamt end of WWII by a special Anglo-American intelligence mission (Army Weapons Bureau) created a special research group (the codenamed ALSOS and directed by Samuel Goudsmit [2] of so called Uranverein or Uranium Society), under Schumann, electron spin fame. The interned group was composed of six whose task it was to examine the possibility of the technical ex - prominent German professors, Werner Heisenberg, Otto Hahn, ploitation of atomic energy ”. The reader may have detected the Carl F. von Weizsäcker, Paul Harteck, Walter Gerlach and Karl careful choice of words: atomic weapons on the Allied side, Wirtz, along with three younger nuclear assistants, Kurt Dieb - atomic energy on the German side. Heisenberg’s statement is ner, Erich Bagge and Hans Korsching, plus one prestigious moreover self contradictory since a vague exploitation of outsider, Professor Max von Laue.
    [Show full text]
  • The Farm Hall Scientists: the United States, Britain, and Germany in the New Atomic Age, 1945-46
    The Farm Hall Scientists: The United States, Britain, and Germany in the New Atomic Age, 1945-46 by Mary A. McPartland B.A. in History and Spanish, May 2003, Regis University A Dissertation submitted to The Faculty of The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 31, 2013 Dissertation directed by Hope M. Harrison Associate Professor of History and International Affairs The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University certifies that Mary Ann McPartland has passed the Final Examination for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy as of July 23, 2013. This is the final and approved form of the dissertation. The Farm Hall Scientists: The United States, Britain, and Germany in the New Atomic Age, 1945-46 Mary A. McPartland Dissertation Research Committee: Hope M. Harrison, Associate Professor of History and International Affairs, Dissertation Director James Hershberg, Professor of History and International Affairs, Committee Member Andrew Zimmerman, Professor of History and International Affairs, Committee Member ii ©Copyright 2013 by Mary A. McPartland All rights reserved iii Acknowledgments Thank you to the many people who have been generous with their knowledge, time, and friendship during the process of researching and writing this dissertation. First and foremost, I thank my adviser, Hope Harrison, for the time she has spent reading, commenting on, and discussing my work, always encouraging me onward. I am very grateful to have had you as my guide on this journey. Feedback from my dissertation committee has also shaped my dissertation for the better.
    [Show full text]