How to Avoid the Seven Deadly Sins of Surgery
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Surgical Sciencs
Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine School of Bioscience Education 6BBYS301 SURGICAL SCIENCES Module Handbook 2018 - 2019 30 Credits - Level 6 SURGICAL SCIENCES COURSE BOOKLET 2018-19 PROGRAMME LEADS Mr. Kamran Ahmed Senior Lecturer and Hon. Consultant Urological Surgeon [email protected] Professor Prokar Dasgupta Chair for Robotic Surgery & Urological Innovation and Consultant Urological Surgeon [email protected] Prof. Muhammad Shamim Khan Professor of Urology and Surgical Education and Consultant Urological Surgeon [email protected] Dr. Abdullatif Aydin Simulation Research Fellow [email protected] MRC Centre for Transplantation, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences SURGICAL SCIENCES COURSE BOOKLET 2018-19 INTRODUCTION This course aims to provide you with an over-view of fundamental components of surgical sciences and technology by integrating both theoretical and practical aspects of surgery. The course is delivered through a dynamic range of lectures given by leaders in the field, from surgeons and academics alike. Modules covered include introduction to research methods, core and specialist principles of surgery and surgical technology, which will add focus on the modernisation of surgical practice through innovative technology such as robotic and laparoscopic surgery. The course will feature heavily on practical aspects of surgery and hands on experience. Technical skills sessions will be held at the Olympus Simulation Centre at Guy’s Hospital and Weston Education Centre at King’s College Hospital, where you will have access to the latest simulation technology in surgery. There will be opportunities to observe live surgery, including robot-assisted, and enjoy operating theaters and surgical simulation environments. Aside from the technical aspects of surgery, we aim to provide you with an overview of non-technical skills such as communication, team working and surgical decision making, leadership and management. -
Ilk Sayfalar 7/6/04 14:13 Page 1 ANDROLOJ‹ BÜLTEN‹
ilk sayfalar 7/6/04 14:13 Page 1 ANDROLOJ‹ BÜLTEN‹ TÜRK ANDROLOJ‹ DERNE⁄‹ YAYIN ORGANIDIR Türk Androloji Derne¤i Cemil Aslan Güder Sok. ‹dil Ap. B Blok D.1 80280 Gayrettepe, ‹stanbul Tel: 0212 288 50 99 Faks: 0212 288 50 98 E-posta: [email protected] Web: www.androloji.org.tr TÜRK ANDROLOJ‹ DERNE⁄‹ ADINA SAH‹B‹ Prof. Dr. Atefl Kad›o¤lu GENEL YAYIN YÖNETMEN‹ Uz. Dr. Memduh Ayd›n REDAKTÖR Uz. Dr. Ertan Sakall› YÖNET‹M KURULU Atefl Kad›o¤lu (Baflkan) Bülent Semerci (Genel Yazman) ‹rfan Orhan (Sayman) Ramazan Aflç› (Üye) M. Önder Yaman (Üye) Selahittin Çayan (Üye) Mustafa F. Usta (Üye) Nisan 2004 Say› 17 2 Ayda Bir Yay›nlan›r ilk sayfalar 7/6/04 14:14 Page 2 GENEL YAYIN YÖNETMENİ REDAKTÖR Uz. Dr. Memduh Aydın Uz. Dr. Ertan Sakallı BİLİMSEL KURUL ERKEK CİNSEL SAĞLIĞI Yaşlılık ve Cinsellik Ejakülasyo PrekoksRekonstrüktif Cerrahi ED ve Farmakoterapisi Doç. Dr. Ali Atan Prof. Dr. Ahmet Metin Prof. Dr. Erdal Apaydın Uz. Dr. Ertan Sakallı Uz. Dr. Melih Beysel Temel Araştırma Psikolojik ED Doç. Dr. Emin Özbek Yrd. Doç. Dr. Hakan Kılıçarslan Yrd. Doç. Dr. Mustafa Faruk Usta Doç. Dr. Doğan Şahin INFERTİLİTE Varikosel Endokrinoloji Doç. Dr. Selahittin Çayan Uz. Dr. Necati Gürbüz Doç. Dr. Turhan Çaşkurlu Doç. Dr. İsa Özbey Yardımla Üreme Teknikleri Genetik Prof. Dr. Kaan Aydos Doç. Dr. Barış Altay Uz. Dr. Lütfi Tunç Uz. Dr. A. Arman Özdemir Yrd. Doç. Dr. Murat Şamlı Obstrüktif İnfertilite Kadın İnfertilitesi Doç. Dr. Hamdi Özkara Doç. Dr. İrfan Orhan Prof. Dr. Cihat Ünlü Doç. Dr. Erkut Attar Pediatrik Androloji Androloji Laboratuarı Doç. -
KEVII Consultant and Services Directory 2018-19
Consultant and Services Directory 2018/19 Consultant and Services Directory 2018/19 Page 1 Foreword I am delighted to present the latest edition of the Consultant and Services Directory for King Edward VII’s Hospital. I hope you enjoy the new design: our aim was to produce the most intuitive, user-friendly directory you will receive from any hospital and I believe we have achieved that goal. It contains details of all of the consultants who have admitting privileges, and also lists the anaesthetists, general practitioners, radiologists and other specialists who are associated with the hospital. All consultants granted admitting privileges are assessed against rigorous criteria, to ensure that they are leaders in their chosen field and demonstrate the values of King Edward VII’s Hospital in their day to day clinical activities. Professionalism Quality Our values Respect Safety Teamwork Professor Justin Vale Medical Director 2018 Page 2 Page 3 Useful Information Main Hospital Switchboard +44 (0) 20 7486 4411 Chief Executive’s Office +44 (0) 20 7467 4319 Matron’s Office +44 (0) 20 7467 4306 Director of Governance +44 (0) 20 7467 4379 Medical Director +44 (0) 20 7467 4306 Admissions +44 (0) 800 975 8383 [email protected] Pharmacy +44 (0) 20 7467 4329 [email protected] Imaging +44 (0) 20 7467 4327 [email protected] Consulting Rooms +44 (0) 20 7467 4550 [email protected] Physiotherapy & Hydrotherapy +44 (0) 20 7467 4316 [email protected] Patient Accounts +44 (0) -
Introduction of a Novel, Mobile, Nurse‑Led Prostate Cancer Education And
RESEARCH PAPER Introduction of a novel, mobile, nurse‑led prostate cancer education and testing service AUTHORS Helen Crowe Nicholas Howard RN, BApp Sci (Adv Nurs), GradDip EpiBiostats, RN, Urology Research Nurse MNursSci(NP) Epworth Prostate Centre Urology Nurse Practitioner and Research Nurse Level 2, 185 Hoddle St, Richmond, Victoria, Australia Epworth Prostate Centre, Level 2, 185 Hoddle St [email protected] Richmond, Victoria, Australia [email protected] A/Professor Declan Murphy MB, Bch, BaO, FRCS (Urol) Patricia Bugeja, Urology Nurse Clinician Epworth Prostate Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer RN, MNurs Institute Epworth Prostate Centre, The Royal Melbourne Hospital Level 2, 185 Hoddle St, Richmond, Victoria, Australia Level 2, 185 Hoddle St, Richmond, Victoria, Australia [email protected] [email protected] Ben Challacombe, Consultant Urologist Dr Addie Wootten, Clinical Psychologist BSc (Hons), MS, FRCS (Urol) BBSc(Hons), DPsych(Clin), MAPS (CClin) Epworth Prostate Centre, Guys Hospital London Epworth Prostate Centre, The Royal Melbourne Hospital Level 2, 185 Hoddle St, Richmond, Victoria, Australia Level 2, 185 Hoddle St, Richmond, Victoria, Australia [email protected] [email protected] Professor Anthony Costello, Senior Urologist MBBS, FRACS, FRCSI (Hon) MD Epworth Prostate Centre, The Royal Melbourne Hospital Level 2, 185 Hoddle St, Richmond, Victoria, Australia KEY WORDS [email protected] prostate cancer, education, workplace testing ABSTRACT Testing for prostate cancer (PCa) remains a controversial issue with conflicting professional recommendations resulting in wide variation in general practitioner’s opinions, and advice to patients. As a result some men may not receive information about their risk of developing PCa, and are therefore unable to make a decision about undergoing testing. -
BAUS Robot Assisted Surgery Guidelines
BRITISH ASSOCIATION OF UROLOGICAL SURGEONS (BAUS) ROBOTIC SURGERY CURRICULUM - GUIDELINES FOR TRAINING (BAUS) ROBOTIC SURGERY CURRICULUM - GUIDELINES FOR TRAINING BRITISH ASSOCIATION OF UROLOGICAL SURGEONS (BAUS) ROBOTIC SURGERY CURRICULUM - GUIDELINE FOR TRAINING Guideline Panel Members: Ben Challacombe (MS, FRCS Urol) 1 Kamran Ahmed (MRCS, PhD) 1 Naeem Soomro (FRCS Urol) 2 Prokar Dasgupta (MD, MSc, FRCS Urol, FEBU) 1 Muhammad Shamim Khan (OBE, FRCS Urol, FEBU) 1 William Cross (FRCS Urol, PhD) 3 Robin Weston (FRCS Urol) 4 Vijay Sanger (FRCS Urol) 5 Adrian Joyce (MS FRCS Urol) 6 Kieran O’Flynn (MD FRCS Urol) 7 Mark Speakman (MS FRCS) 8 1 MRC Centre for Transplantation, Kings College London, Urology Centre, Guy’s Hospital, London, UK 2 Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK 3 Department of Urology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK 4 Department of Urology, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK 5 Department of Urology, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester, UK 6 Department of Urology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK 7 Urology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford 8 Department of Urology, Taunton and Somerset hospital, Taunton, UK 2 (BAUS) ROBOTIC SURGERY CURRICULUM - GUIDELINES FOR TRAINING CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................4 2. SKILLSETS REQUIRED WITHIN ROBOTIC SURGERY ..............................................5 -
That Silly Operation! the Introduction of TURP Into Great Britain
That Silly Operation! The introduction of TURP into Great Britain Jonathan Charles Goddard 1 Jonathan Charles Goddard Curator of the Museum of Urology, BAUS Consultant Urological Surgeon Leicester General Hospital Acknowledgements I’m very grateful to Mr Bernard Ferrie FRCS, retired Urological Surgeon, who acted as expert editor. Thanks to Miss H.P.H. Goddard, Junior Curator, for photographing the instruments from the collection. I’m extremely grateful to KARL STORZ Endoscopy (UK) Ltd. who generously published this booklet for the 2019 BAUS Annual Meeting in Glasgow. 2 “That Silly Operation!” The introduction of TURP into Great Britain “We want you to give up that silly TURP operation John, it will bring St Peter’s into disrepute”. This is what John Blandy, one of the icons of Twentieth Century British Urology, was told by his “greaters and betters” at St Peter’s Hospital (the famous London urology centre) as late as the 1960’s[1]. TURP even at that stage was still seen as a “silly” new and dangerous operation that should not replace open prostatectomy. However, Transurethral Resection of the Prostate, TURP, is now seen as one of the operations that define Urology. Certain procedures, over time, have stood out as key indicators of Urology; lithotomy, lithotrity, cystoscopy, open prostatectomy, radical prostatectomy and now robotic prostatectomy. They are each surgeries of their age, their names associated with Urology and even certain urologists. A brief roll call of names are easily linked with each one; Cheselden (lithotomy), Civiale and Sir Henry Thompson (blind lithotrity), Nitze and Hurry Fenwick (Cystoscopy), Sir Peter Freyer (open prostatectomy), Patrick Walsh (Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy), Roger Kirby and Prokar Dasgupta (Robotic prostatectomy in the UK). -
Urethro-Vesical Dysfunction in Progressive Autonomic Failure with Multiple System Atrophy
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1986;49:554-562 Urethro-vesical dysfunction in progressive autonomic failure with multiple system atrophy ROGER KIRBY,* CLARE FOWLER,* JOHN GOSLING,t ROGER BANNISTER$ From the Department of Urology, Middlesex Hospital,* London, The National Hospitalfor Nervous Diseases, London, and the Department ofAnatomy, University ofManchester,t UK SUMMARY Fourteen patients with progressive autonomic failure and multiple system atrophy have been investigated by urodynamic, electromyographic and neurohistochemical means and the results compared with a series of age-matched controls. Three fundamental abnormalities of lower urinary tract function have been identified: (1) Involuntary detrusor contractions in response to bladder filling. It is suggested that these may be the result of a loss of inhibitory influences from the corpus striatum and substantia nigra. (2) Loss of the ability to initiate a voluntary micturition reflex. This may reflect the degeneration of neurons in pontine and medullary nuclei and in the sacral inter- mediolateral columns. In addition, these studies have demonstrated a significant reduction in the density of acetylcholinesterase-containing nerves in bladder muscle. (3) Profound urethral dys- function. This appears to be partly due to a loss of proximal urethral sphincter tone, which causes bladder neck incompetence. In addition, the function of the striated component of the urethral sphincter is impaired. Individual motor units recorded from this muscle were clearly abnormal when compared with controls and suggested that reinnervation had occurred. We suggest that this is the result of degeneration of a specific group of sacral anterior horn cells known as Onuf's nucleus. The evidence that these particular motor units are affected, while others are spared, poses fundamental questions about the nature of selective vulnerability in degenerative diseases of the nervous system. -
University of Birmingham So Much Cost, Such Little Progress
University of Birmingham So Much Cost, Such Little Progress Bryan, Richard T; Kirby, Roger; O'Brien, Tim; Mostafid, Hugh DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.031 License: Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND) Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): Bryan, RT, Kirby, R, O'Brien, T & Mostafid, H 2014, 'So Much Cost, Such Little Progress', European urology, vol. 66, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.031 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: Checked October 2015 General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policy While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive. -
Queen Square Alumnus Association
QUEEN SQUARE ALUMNUS ASSOCIATION Issue 4 December 2012 Editor Mr David Blundred Teaching and E-Learning Administrator [email protected] Editorial Leads Professor Simon Shorvon Professor Andrew Lees Miss Jean Reynolds Ms Daniela Warr Schori Miss Pat Harris Professor Ian McDonald dŚĞ ŽƉŝŶŝŽŶƐ ĞdžƉƌĞƐƐĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ŶĞǁ ƐůĞƩ Ğƌ ďLJ authors and interviewees do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Editor or the UCL /ŶƐƟƚƵƚĞŽĨE ĞƵƌŽůŽŐLJĂŶĚE ĂƟŽŶĂů, ŽƐƉŝƚĂůĨŽƌ Neurology and Neurosurgery. All photographs have been kindly provided by D ĞĚŝĐĂů/ůůƵƐƚƌĂƟŽŶ͕ Y ƵĞĞŶ^ƋƵĂƌĞ>ŝďƌĂƌLJĂŶĚ ƚŚĞĚŝƚŽƌƐƉƌŝǀ ĂƚĞĐŽůůĞĐƟŽŶ͘ Contents Editorial 02 News 03 Queen Square Alumnus A round-up of the latest news Association meeting 2013 from Queen Square Alumni News 09 Queen Square Alumnus Association Meeting 11 News, views and recollections from Programme details your fellow alumni Upcoming Events 12 Queen Square Interview 13 A sample of events on offer The Editor interviews Professor Clare over the next few months Fowler on her career at Queen Square Alumni Interview 18 The Editors Travels 20 Dr Andreas Moustris talks about his time at Queen Square An update on the Editors Travels Focus on the Dominican Republic 21 Wilsons Disease Centenary Symposium 23 Professor Jose Puello updates us on developments Professor Niall Quinn and Dr Ted Reynolds in the Dominican Republic speak about this event Out of the Archives 26 Photos from our Archives 28 Christmas recollections from 1906 A look at some of our photos from our archives Belfast Neurology 30 Front Cover Explained 33 Dr Stanley Hawkins talks about Neurology in the Nineteenth and A look at the front cover Early Twentieth Century 1 EDITORIAL The Queen square Alumnus Association Meeting July 2013 I am delighted to announce that we will be holding a two day Alumnus meeting on the 8th and 9th July 2013. -
Nerve Advancement with End-To-End Reconstruction After Partial Neurovascular Bundle Resection:A Feasibility Study
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY Volume 21, Number 8, August 2007 © Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. DOI: 10.1089/end.2007.9946 New Technology Nerve Advancement with End-to-End Reconstruction after Partial Neurovascular Bundle Resection:A Feasibility Study JUAN I. MARTINEZ-SALAMANCA, M.D.,1 SANDHYA RAO, M.D.,1 RAJAN RAMANATHAN, M.D.,1 JAVIER GONZALEZ, M.D.,2 ANIL MANDHANI, M.D.,1 XIMING YANG, M.D.,1 JIANGLING TU,1 E. DARRACOTT VAUGHAN, M.D.,1 and ASHUTOSH TEWARI, M.D.1 ABSTRACT Background and Purpose: It is clear that some patients with prostate cancer require a total or partial neu- rovascular bundle (NVB) resection for oncologic safety to be guaranteed. Nerve grafting is an alternative for these patients to maintain erectile function; however, we report on a feasible option where the NVB is re- leased, and both terminal nerve fibers are approximated; this is the “nerve advancement technique (NAT).” Patients and Methods: Since 2005, a total of 215 men aged 48 to 70 years (mean 59 years) with a Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) score of 22 have undergone robotic radical prostatectomy for cancer. We selected prospectively seven men to have NAT performed because of clinical high-risk criteria (serum prostate specific antigen [PSA] concentration Ͼ20 mg/dL, Gleason score ϭ 8, and stage cT2c or higher), intraopera- tive criteria (difficulty separating the tissues around the prostate), and evidence of extracapsular extension (ECE) on magnetic resonance imaging. We performed unilateral partial resection, nerve advancement, and, finally, end-to-end anastomosis in six patients, whereas in one patient, we did a bilateral partial excision. -
Current Status of Validation for Robotic Surgery Simulators a Systematic
Review Current status of validation for robotic surgery simulators – a systematic review Hamid Abboudi, Mohammed S. Khan, Omar Aboumarzouk*, Khurshid A. Guru†, Ben Challacombe, Prokar Dasgupta and Kamran Ahmed MRC Centre for Transplantation, King's College London, King's Health Partners, Department of Urology, Guy's Hospital, London, *Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK, and †Department of Urology, Roswell Park Center for Robotic Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? • Little is known on how best to train the future generation of robotic surgeons. It has been postulated that virtual reality (VR) simulators may aid the progression along the learning curve for this rapidly developing surgical technique within a safe training environment. There are several simulators available on the market, the best known is that developed by Intuitive Surgical Inc. • The present study provides the first systematic review of all the trails of the various VR robotic platforms. It explores the evidence supporting the effectiveness of the various platforms for feasibility, reliability, validity, acceptability, educational impact and cost-effectiveness. This article also highlights the deficiencies and future work required to advance robotic surgical training. To analyse studies validating the effectiveness of robotic content and construct validity. The Robotic Surgical surgery simulators. The MEDLINE®, EMBASE® and SimulatorTM system has only been face and content PsycINFO® databases were systematically searched until validated. All of the simulators except SEP have shown September 2011. References from retrieved articles were educational impact. Feasibility and cost-effectiveness of reviewed to broaden the search. -
Prostate Cancer
Prostate Cancer Prostate Cancer EDITED BY Prokar Dasgupta Consultant Urological Surgeon Department of Urology King’s College London Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital NHS Foundation Trust London, UK Roger S. Kirby Consultant Urologist The Prostate Centre, London, UK Foreword by Peter T. Scardino A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication This edition first published 2012 © 2012 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Blackwell Publishing was acquired by John Wiley & Sons in February 2007. Blackwell’s publishing program has been merged with Wiley’s global Scientific, Technical and Medical business to form Wiley-Blackwell. Registered office: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK Editorial offices: 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, UK The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030-5774, USA For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com/wiley-blackwell The right of the author to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher. Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks.