The Kerala Panchayat Raj Act & Rules
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Panchayati Raj and Watershed Management in India: Constraints and Opportunities
Working Paper 114 PANCHAYATI RAJ AND WATERSHED MANAGEMENT IN INDIA: CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES PARI BAUMANN December 1998 Overseas Development Institute Portland House Stag Place London SW1E 5DP 2 3 Acknowledgements This report is based largely on interviews with representatives from the Government, Panchayati Raj Institutions, NGOs, Self-help Groups and Academic Institutions. I would like to thank all of the respondents for the generous amounts of time they spared to discuss their experiences of Panchayati Raj and Watershed Development with me. I would like to thank Ashok Kumar of Development Alternatives in Bangalore for accompanying me on the visit to Gram Panchayats in Tumkur District. I would like to thank Write Arm in Bangalore for their logistical support in Bangalore, and for providing an inviting base from which to plan the work. Thank you also to Janet Seeley and Peter Reid, of the Rural Development Office of the Department for International Development in New Delhi, for suggesting contacts for interviews and for their interest in the study. 4 Contents Summary 6 Acronyms 9 1 Introduction 10 1.1 Introduction 10 1.2 Background 10 1.3 The terms of reference and research methodology 11 2 The legal framework and historical background 12 2.1 Brief outline of the new policies 12 2.2 Panchayati Raj and the 73rd Constitutional Amendment 12 2.3 State planning and the Guidelines 16 2.4 The research question 17 3 Decentralisation: the spirit and the letter of the law 19 3.1 Different types of decentralisation 19 3.2 Decentralisation -
Office of Nagar Panchayat Ukhimath
OFFICE OF NAGAR PANCHAYAT UKHIMATH DETAIL PROJECT REPORT,OF RAJIV AWAS YOJNA,UKHIMATH DETAIL PROJECT REPORT OF RAJIV AWAS YOJNA FOR UKHIMATH RAY PROJECTS OF DISASTER AREA IN UTTARAKHAND PROPOSED APPROVED APPROVED APPROVED UKIMATH IN UTTARAKHAND STATE Route Map Project Location 1.Ukhimath is a pilgrimage site in Rudraprayag district, Uttarakhand, India.It is at an elevation of 1311 metres and at a distance of 41 km fromRudraprayag. During the winters, the idols from Kedarnath temple, and Madhyamaheshwar are brought to Ukhimath and worshipped there for six months. 2.Ukhimath can be used as center destination for visiting different places located nearby, i.e. Madhmaheshwar (Second kedar),Tungnath ji (Third kedar) and Deoria Tal(natural fresh water lake) and many other picturesque places. 3.One of the town severely affected by water induced disaster occurred in 2013. 4. Population as per census 2011 :3125 5.Total area: 2.78263 sq.km RAY INTERVENTION 1. INTERVENTION : In-Situ Housing 2. WARD SPECIFIC : 4 Ward Areas 3. WARD AREAS : Identified by UKHIMATH NAGAR PANCHAYAT 4.OWNERSHIP OF LAND : BENEFICIARY OWNED 5. SLUM FREE CITY PLAN OF ACTION : COMPLIED Project Overview Information about the project area: Ukhimath •Nagar Panchayat Ukhimath created in 2013 •Population as per census 2011 :3125 •Mode of earning in town: :Service/Business/Labour Ward Population and area detail s.no Ward no Wards name Population Area(sq. km) 1 1 Gandhinagar 785 0.49125 2 2 Udaipur 760 0.5132 3 3 Omkareshwar 790 1.18977 4 4 Bhatteshwar 780 0.58841 Total 3125 2.78263 -
Strengthening of Panchayats in India: Comparing Devolution Across States
Strengthening of Panchayats in India: Comparing Devolution across States Empirical Assessment - 2012-13 April 2013 Sponsored by Ministry of Panchayati Raj Government of India The Indian Institute of Public Administration New Delhi Strengthening of Panchayats in India: Comparing Devolution across States Empirical Assessment - 2012-13 V N Alok The Indian Institute of Public Administration New Delhi Foreword It is the twentieth anniversary of the 73rd Amendment of the Constitution, whereby Panchayats were given constitu- tional status.While the mandatory provisions of the Constitution regarding elections and reservations are adhered to in all States, the devolution of powers and resources to Panchayats from the States has been highly uneven across States. To motivate States to devolve powers and responsibilities to Panchayats and put in place an accountability frame- work, the Ministry of Panchayati Raj, Government of India, ranks States and provides incentives under the Panchayat Empowerment and Accountability Scheme (PEAIS) in accordance with their performance as measured on a Devo- lution Index computed by an independent institution. The Indian Institute of Public Administration (IIPA) has been conducting the study and constructing the index while continuously refining the same for the last four years. In addition to indices on the cumulative performance of States with respect to the devolution of powers and resources to Panchayats, an index on their incremental performance,i.e. initiatives taken during the year, was introduced in the year 2010-11. Since then, States have been awarded for their recent exemplary initiatives in strengthening Panchayats. The Report on"Strengthening of Panchayats in India: Comparing Devolution across States - Empirical Assessment 2012-13" further refines the Devolution Index by adding two more pillars of performance i.e. -
Uttarakhand Van Panchayats
Law Environment and Development JournalLEAD ADMINISTRATIVE AND POLICY BOTTLENECKS IN EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF VAN PANCHAYATS IN UTTARAKHAND, INDIA B.S. Negi, D.S. Chauhan and N.P. Todaria COMMENT VOLUME 8/1 LEAD Journal (Law, Environment and Development Journal) is a peer-reviewed academic publication based in New Delhi and London and jointly managed by the School of Law, School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) - University of London and the International Environmental Law Research Centre (IELRC). LEAD is published at www.lead-journal.org ISSN 1746-5893 The Managing Editor, LEAD Journal, c/o International Environmental Law Research Centre (IELRC), International Environment House II, 1F, 7 Chemin de Balexert, 1219 Châtelaine-Geneva, Switzerland, Tel/fax: + 41 (0)22 79 72 623, [email protected] COMMENT ADMINISTRATIVE AND POLICY BOTTLENECKS IN EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF VAN PANCHAYATS IN UTTARAKHAND, INDIA B.S. Negi, D.S. Chauhan and N.P. Todaria This document can be cited as B.S. Negi, D.S. Chauhan and N.P. Todaria, ‘Administrative and Policy Bottlenecks in Effective Management of Van Panchayats in Uttarakhand, India’, 8/1 Law, Environment and Development Journal (2012), p. 141, available at http://www.lead-journal.org/content/12141.pdf B.S. Negi, Deputy Commissioner, Ministry of Agriculture, Govt. of India, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi, India D.S. Chauhan, Department of Forestry, P.O. -59, HNB Garhwal University, Srinagar (Garhwal) – 246 174, Uttarakhand, India N.P. Todaria, Department of Forestry, P.O. -59, HNB Garhwal University, Srinagar (Garhwal) – 246 174, Uttarakhand, India, Email: [email protected] Published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 License TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. -
A Comparative Study of Women in Local Government in India and Pakistan
Journal of International Politics Volume 2, Issue 2, 2020, PP 24-32 ISSN 2642-8245 A Comparative Study of Women in Local Government in India and Pakistan Nadeem Malik* Development Studies Program, School of Social and Political Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Australia. *Corresponding Author: Nadeem Malik, Development Studies Program, School of Social and Political Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Australia ABSTRACT Women's participation and representation in politics at the local level is considered important for gender equity and women’s empowerment. The recent wave of decentralisation in the late 1990s in India and Pakistan promised to solve women-related community problems at the grass-root level and more importantly, to empower them socially, economically and politically. This article demonstrates the extent to which such aspirations could be realized. Keyword: women’s political representation, local government, India, Pakistan INTRODUCTION institutions and the donor countries. With few exceptions, this is most vividly illustrated by the The decade of the 1980s saw an increasing rise of political gangsters in the leadership of enthusiasm for decentralisation in developing parties, parliaments and executive bodies at the countries. The concept itself was part of the good local level in most countries1. The failure of governance agenda of the World Bank and decentralizing was due to inadequate local donor countries in the first world (Malik, 2016). It was thought that the failure of earlier government framework, ineffective implementation development paradigms (especially the structural or capture of local government by interest groups or adjustment program) was due to bad institutional a combination of these factors (Malik, 2009). -
Community Based Monitoring System for Access to Basic Minimum Services, Kerala
Community Based Monitoring System for Access to Basic Minimum Services, Kerala D Narayana Slim Haddad Smitha Aravind Katia Mohindra Paper to be presented at the PEP-CBMS conference in Dakar, June 16-20, 2004. Community Based Monitoring System for Access to Basic Minimum Services, Kerala 1. Introduction The paper presents a brief outline of the approach and results arrived so far of the CBMS in Kerala, India. The organization of the paper is as follows. It begins by presenting the attempt at democratic decentralization in India over the last ten years- the constitutional amendment, the structure of governance, and the mandate of the local governments. The problems faced by the local governments in fulfilling the mandate of data based planning and monitoring is explained followed by the presentation of the salient aspects of the project, Community Based Monitoring System for Access to Basic Minimum Services, Kerala. The attempt at building a database at the local level and the three track approach of the CBMS in Kerala is, then discussed in some detail. 2. The 73rd and 74th Amendments to the Constitution of India, which became law in April 1993, provided the foundation for a comparable democratic decentralization in the rural and urban areas respectively across the states of India. The Amendments made it mandatory for each state to constitute Local Self-Government Institutions (called Panchayats in rural areas) at the village, intermediate and district levels (except for states with less than two million population). The three-tier structure of governance in India following the formation of Panchayats and Municipalities is shown in Figure 1. -
Porations and the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships (Amendment and Continuance) Ordinance, 2016 (Mah
¨É½þÉ®úɹ]Åõ ¶ÉɺÉxÉ ®úÉVÉ{ÉjÉ +ºÉÉvÉÉ®úhÉ ¦ÉÉMÉ +É`ö ´É¹ÉÇ 2, +ÆEòú 59(2)] ¨ÉÆMɳý´ÉÉ®ú, +ÉìMɺ]õ 30, 2016/¦ÉÉpù 8, ¶ÉEäò 1938 [{ÉÞ¹`ä 10, ËEò¨ÉiÉ : ¯û{ɪÉä 27.00 +ºÉÉvÉÉ®úhÉ Gò¨ÉÉÆEòú 95 |ÉÉÊvÉEÞòiÉ |ÉEòɶÉxÉ ¨É½þÉ®úɹ]Åõ Ê´ÉvÉÉxɍɯb÷³ýÉSÉä +ÊvÉÊxÉªÉ¨É ´É ®úÉVªÉ{ÉɱÉÉÆxÉÒ |ÉJªÉÉÊ{ÉiÉ Eäò±Éä±Éä +vªÉÉnäù¶É ´É Eäò±Éä±Éä Ê´ÉÊxÉªÉ¨É +ÉÊhÉ Ê´ÉÊvÉ ´É xªÉÉªÉ Ê´É¦ÉÉMÉÉEòbÚ÷xÉ +ɱÉä±ÉÒ Ê´ÉvÉäªÉEäò (<ÆOÉVÉÒ +xÉÖ´ÉÉnù). In pursuance of clause (3) of article 348 of the Constitution of India, the following translation in English of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations and the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships (Amendment and Continuance) Ordinance, 2016 (Mah. Ord. XVI of 2016), is hereby published under the authority of the Governor. By order and in the name of the Governor of Maharashtra, P. H. MALI, Principal Secretary to Government, Law and Judiciary Department. [Translation in English of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations and the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships (Amendment and Continuance) Ordinance, 2016 (Mah. Ord. XVI of 2016), published under the authority of the Governor.] URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Mantralaya, Madam Cama Marg, Hutatma Rajguru Chowk, Mumbai 400 032, dated the 30th August 2016. MAHARASHTRA ORDINANCE No. XVI OF 2016. AN ORDINANCE further to amend the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act and the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965. WHEREAS the Governor of Maharashtra had promulgated the (Amendment) Bill, 2016 (L.A. -
Decentralisation and Municipalities
DECENTRALISATION AND MUNICIPALITIES The 73rd and 74th Constitution Amendment Acts are sister legislations passed by the Parliament in 1992. The 73rd Constitution Amendment Act provided directions for the creation of Panchayats in the rural areas and the 74th Constitution Amendment Act provided for the creation of Municipalities in urban areas. The two legislations laid a broad framework for the setting up of Panchayats and Municipalities by the states. The legislations also stipulated a time limit within which the state governments were to enact conforming legislations to enable setting up of Panchayats and Municipalities, that is by the 1st of July 1994. Prior to the enactment of these two legislations, the functioning of the local bodies was totally dependent on the whims and fancies of the state governments. The supersession of the local bodies was a very common occurrence. Further, the vital arms necessary for the efficient functioning of the local bodies such as the District Planning Committee, Metropolitan Planning Committee, Wards Committee, State Election Commission etc., are either missing or not in a functional state. Although the setting up of these institutions has been made mandatory by the Constitution, in most states they are still not in place. The reasons for their absence or ineffectivity have been discussed in this paper. The legislation apart from laying broad criteria for constitution, composition of Municipalities, elections/removal of Mayor or Chairpersons, qualification/disqualification of membership, setting up of State Election Commission etc., left it to the state governments to prescribe the actual norms. This was done while keeping in mind the federal nature of our political system and also since a minority government was tabling the Bill in the Parliament and was dependent on other regional parties for its passage. -
UTTARAKHAND OPEN UNIVERSITY Teen Pani Bypass Road, Near Transport Nagar, Haldwani -263139 Phone No- 05946 - 261122, 261123 Toll Free No
CYBER CRIMES AND CONSUMER PROTECTION IN CYBERSPACE CYL-104 [1] CYL- 104 Cyber Crimes And Consumer Protection in Cyber Space School of Law UTTARAKHAND OPEN UNIVERSITY Teen Pani Bypass Road, Near Transport Nagar, Haldwani -263139 Phone No- 05946 - 261122, 261123 Toll Free No. 18001804025 Fax No.- 05946-264232, Email- [email protected], http://uou.ac.in Uttarakhand Open University CYBER CRIMES AND CONSUMER PROTECTION IN CYBERSPACE CYL-104 [2] BOARD OF STUDIES Professor Girija Prasad Pande, Director, School of Law, Uttarakhand Open University, Haldwani, Nainital. Professor J.S.Bisht, Faculty of Law,S.S. Jeena Campus, Almora,Kumaun University, Nainital, Uttarakhand. Professor B.P. Maithani, Former RTI Advisor, Government of Uttarakhand Mr. Deepankur Joshi, Coordinator School of Law, Uttarakhand Open University, Haldwani, (Nainital). UNIT WRITING UNIT WRITERS UNIT [1] Dr. Razit Sharma, Assistant Professor, Unit- 1,2,3,4 Law College, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun Uttarakhand [2] Ms. Sapna Agarwal, Advocate High Court of Uttarakhand, Unit- 5,6,7 Nainital [3 Mr. Rajeev Bhatt, Advocate High Court of Uttarakhand, Ex. RTI Advisor Kumaun University Nainital, Ex. Assistant Professor Unity Unit- 8 ,9,10 Law College Rudrapur [4] Dr. Sushim Shukla, Assistant Professor, Unit- 11, 12, 13 Law College, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun Uttarakhand EDITOR Mr. Deepankur Joshi, Coordinator, School of Law, Uttarakhand Open University, Haldwani, (Nainital) Copyright © Uttarakhand Open University, Haldwani, Nainital Edition- 2018, Pre Publication copy for Limited Circulation ISBN- Publication- Directorate of Studies and Publication, Uttarakhand Open University, Haldwani, Nainital. E- Mail: [email protected] . Uttarakhand Open University CYBER CRIMES AND CONSUMER PROTECTION IN CYBERSPACE CYL-104 [3] POST GRADUATE DIPLOMA IN CYBER LAW CYL- 104 CYBERCRIMES AND CONSUMER PROTECTION IN CYBER SPACE INDEX S. -
The Manipur Municipalities Act, 1994 ___Arrangement of Sections
THE MANIPUR MUNICIPALITIES ACT, 1994 ____________ ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS _____________ CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY SECTIONS 1. Short title, extent and commencement. 2. Definitions. CHAPTER II CONSTITUTION OF MUNICIPALITIES 3. Constitution of municipalities. 4. Effect of exclusion of local area from municipality. 5. Election and maintenance of boundary marks. CHAPTER III NAGAR PANCHAYAT 6. Incorporation of Nagar Panchayat. 7. Composition of Nagar Panchayat. 8. Application of certain provisions relating to Council in case of Nagar Panchayat. 9. Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson of Nagar Panchayat. 10. Election of Chairperson and Vice-Chairpersons. 11. Resignation by Chairperson, Vice Chairperson and Councillor. 12. Remuneration to Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson. CHAPTER IV MUNICIPAL COUNCIL 13. Incorporation of Municipal Council. 14. Municipal administration. 15. Composition of Council. 16. Constitution and composition of Wards Committees. 17. Reservation of seats. 18. Allocation of reserved seats and delimitation of wards. 19. Disqualifications for membership. 20. Oath of office. 21. Appointment of administrator. 22. Duration of municipalities, etc. 23. Every Council to have Chairperson and a Vice-Chairperson. 24. Election of Chairperson. 25. Election of Vice-Chairperson. 26. Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson cease to hold office as such. 27. Filling up of vacancies and term of office of persons filling up the vacancy. 1 SECTIONS 28. Resignation by Chairperson, Vice-Chairperson and Councillor. 29. Removal of Councillors. 30. Effect of removal of a Councillor. 31. No-confidence motion against Chairperson or Vice-Chairperson. 32. Grant of leave of absence to Chairperson or Vice-Chairperson. 33. Powers and functions of the Chairperson. 34. Function of Vice-Chairperson. 35. Remuneration of Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson. -
A Study on Effectiveness of Panchayati Raj Institutions in Health Care System in the State of Kerala
A Study on Effectiveness of Panchayati Raj Institutions in Health Care System in the State of Kerala Dr. Jacob John Kerala Development Society (KDS-Delhi) 811-A, Jaina Tower I, District Centre, Janakpuri, New Delhi -110058 Ph :+91-11-41815051/+91-11-9811204487 Email : [email protected], [email protected] Website : www.kdsonline.org, www.nrlg.org Sponsored by Planning Commission Government of India November 2012 Preface The imperative role of Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) in the context of dual responsibilities and controls in public health care system has made a positive impact on rural health scenario of Kerala. The present study has brought out successful experiences of PRIs in Kerala for the consideration of other Indian states in the formulation of action plan for strengthening public health delivery system. For instance, Hospital Management Committee (HMC) under the leadership of the elected head of the concerned local government plays a vital role in the management of a public health institution in Kerala. While the chairperson of HMC is elected head of the local government, Medical Officer of the respective Public Health Institution is its convener. HMC is a democratically constituted body that provides a platform for elected representatives and officials of PRIs/ Municipalities and health officials to work jointly for the efficient functioning of PHIs. This experience can be shared with some of the Indian States where Rogi Kalyan Samities are not functioning as democratically run system. Similarly, there is a good scope for mobilizing local resources for the implementation of public health projects under the initiatives of Panchayati Raj Institutions in Indian States. -
Panchayati Raj in India. the Evolution Between 1947 and 1992
RUPRECHT-KARLS-UNIVERSITÄT HEIDELBERG FAKULTÄT FÜR WIRTSCHAFTS-UND SOZIALWISSENSCHAFTEN Panchayati Raj in India The Evolution between 1947 and 1992 Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Dr. rer. pol. an der Fakultät für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften der Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg vorgelegt von: Kai Fabian Fürstenberg Februar 2015 Erstgutachter: Professor Subrata K. Mitra, PhD (Rochester) Zweitgutachter: Professor Dr. Dietmar Rothermund Content List of Figures and Tables iv 1. Introduction 1 1.1 State of Research 10 1.2. Why Evolutionary Institutionalism? 13 2. Theory 16 2.1. Rational Choice Institutionalism 17 2.1.1. The Role of the Equilibrium 19 2.1.2. Structured and Unstructured Institutions 21 2.2. Historical Institutionalism 23 2.2.1. Path Dependence and Critical Junctures 25 2.2.2. Critique on Path Dependency 29 2.3. Sociological Institutionalism 30 2.3.1. Isomorphism 31 2.3.2. Change and Legitimacy 34 2.4. Three Institutionalisms – A Critique 35 2.4.1. Oversimplifying Reality: Rational Choice Institutionalism 35 2.4.2. No Change from Within: Historical Institutionalism 36 2.4.3. What are Institutions Exactly? Sociological Institutionalism 38 2.5. Evolution and the Origins of Universal Darwinism 40 2.5.1. Evolutionary Thought: An Overview 41 2.5.2. What is Darwinian Evolution? 44 2.5.3. A Short History of Evolutionary Theory in the Social Sciences 47 2.5.4. Sociobiology and Meme-Theory 48 2.5.4.1. Sociobiology 49 2.5.4.2. Meme-Theory 54 i 2.6. Evolutionary Institutionalism 58 2.6.1. Change: The Analogy between Genes and Institutions 59 2.6.2.