Public Notice

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Public Notice DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS 4400 PGA BOULEVARD SUITE 500 PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 33410 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF January 12, 2018 Regulatory Division PUBLIC NOTICE REGIONAL GENERAL PERMIT (RGP) SAJ-5 SAJ-2006-01731(RGP-KDS) MAINTENANCE AND MINOR DREDGING IN FLORIDA PROPOSAL: To simplify and streamline permitting of Department of Army (DA) permits, the Jacksonville District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is proposing to update and re-issue the above-listed RGP. A draft of the proposed general permit conditions is provided, below. BACKGROUND: On April 5, 2013, the Corps reissued the above referenced general permit for maintenance dredging in residential canals in the State of Florida. This general permit was originally issued in the mid-1970s pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899, and has been reviewed and reissued every five years since then. According to the Corps’ ORM 2 database, during the time period October 10, 2012 through October 10, 2017, the SAJ-5 has been utilized a total of 56 times. Please note, the category of work has been expanded; therefore, the title of the general permit has changed from Maintenance Dredging in Residential Canals in Florida to Maintenance and Minor Dredging in Florida. AUTHORITY: Upon recommendation of the Chief of Engineers, pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403), the Corps proposes to re-issue RGP SAJ-5 for maintenance and minor dredging in waters of the United States, within the State of Florida, in accordance with the following Special Conditions. WORK AUTHORIZED: The work herein authorized includes new work and maintenance associated with dredging, as described below, throughout the State of Florida. The specific dredge activities and parameters included are: 1. Maintenance dredging is defined as dredging located within the same footprint and to the same depth as previously authorized. If the previously authorized depth is unknown, dredging is limited to -7.0 ft Mean Low Water (MLW) including any advanced maintenance or overdredge. 2. Minor Dredging is defined as new dredging for: a. Accommodating vessel mooring at boat slips around docks and marinas, the size is limited to the minimum necessary to accommodate vessel mooring, not to exceed 5,000 ft². The maximum allowed dredging depth (including overdredge) cannot exceed the depth of the adjacent navigational channel (i.e., controlling depth) or a maximum depth of -7 ft MLW. For projects located adjacent to federal channels (not within the dredged navigational channel), the dredging depth can exceed -7 ft MLW so long as it does not exceed the controlling depth of the federal channel. b. Treasure hunting and salvage operations that use blowers, propeller deflectors, and suctioning devices, the size is limited to a total of 5,000 ft² and is limited to sandy areas only. c. Minor dredging includes dredging to accommodate the placement of shoreline stabilization, outfall structures; boat ramps; upland cut boat ramps and basins; temporary platforms, fill, and cofferdams; and placement of erosion and scour control- measures. This type of dredging is usually required to embed materials and/or to allow smooth transition of the work to the natural surrounding elevation. 3. Muck Dredging for Water Quality: Muck Dredging, or removing accumulated organic to restore natural habitats and for water quality enhancement, as follows: a. Muck dredging cannot be used to increase water depths to support navigation, access, or vessel mooring. b. Dredging depths are limited to only that necessary to remove the muck layer down to natural sediments. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Written Authorization Required: No work shall be performed until the applicant submits satisfactory plans for the proposed work and receives written authorization from the District Engineer. 2. Excluded Activities: Hopper dredging and dredging of Federal channels is not included. Minor dredging does not include dredging to create new navigational channels. SAJ-5 does not authorize the removal of plugs or the connection of any canal or other non-connected waterbody to navigable waters of the United States or to any other waters of the United States. 3. Exclusion Areas: The following areas are specifically excluded from authorization under SAJ-5: a. Motorboat prohibited zones, no entry zones, and Federal Manatee Sanctuaries. b. Biscayne Bay National Park Protection Zone (Dade County), St. Lucie Impoundment (Martin County), and areas identified in the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1317, et seq.): the St. Mary’s River, from its headwaters to its confluence 2 with the Bells River, the entire Wekiva River, including Wekiwa Springs Run, Rock Springs Run, the entire Seminole Creek, and Black Water Creek from its outfall at Lake Norris to its confluence with the Wekiva River, the Loxahatchee River from Riverbend Park downstream to Jonathan Dickinson State Park. c. The following state parks: John Pennekamp Coral Reef State Park, Lignum Vitae Key State Botanical Site and Aquatic Preserve, Long Key State Park, Curry Hammock State Park, and Bahia Honda State Park. d. Canals in the Kings Bay/Crystal River/Homosassa/Salt River system (Citrus County). e. Guana Tolomato Matanzas National Estuarine Research Reserve (St. Johns and Flagler Counties). f. Lake Miccosukee (Leon and Jefferson Counties). g. National Marine Fisheries Service designated smalltooth sawfish limited exclusion zones, and designated Critical Habitat for the Gulf sturgeon and North Atlantic right whale. h. Those areas subject to Shoreline Management Plans (i.e., Lake Seminole and Lake Okeechobee and the Okeechobee Waterway). 4. Timucuan Ecological and Historical Preserve: No work shall be authorized by this RGP within the boundaries of the Timucuan Ecological and Historical Preserve (Duval County) until the National Park Service has been contacted and offered the opportunity to submit comments to the Corps on the effects of the proposed project on the preserve. 5. Smalltooth sawfish critical habitat: a. Maintenance dredging of canals in smalltooth sawfish critical habitat is included as long as it is within the previously authorized dredge footprint and to the previously Corps authorized depth. b. For minor dredging: If only the shallow euryhaline (Mean High Water Line (MHWL) to -3 ft MLLW) water essential feature is present (i.e., no red mangroves), dredged depths are limited to a maximum depth of -3 ft MLLW. If red mangroves are present, dredging, excavation, or disposal is not allowed within 5 ft of all red mangrove prop roots. c. Muck dredging is not allowed in shallow, euryhaline habitat (MHWL to -3 ft MLLW) 3 d. Dredging and disposal activities are not allowed in areas identified as smalltooth sawfish limited exclusion zones, as shown in Attachment A. 6. Gulf sturgeon critical habitat: No treasure hunting or muck dredging is allowed in Gulf sturgeon critical habitat at any time of year. No maintenance or minor dredging is allowed in Gulf sturgeon critical habitat between September and March, when sturgeon are likely to be present in these areas. 7. Acropora critical habitat: This RGP does not cover dredging (maintenance, minor, or muck) and disposal in Acropora critical habitat where the essential features are present. This RGP does not cover projects requiring penetrating or removing underlying hard substrate (e.g., bedrock, hardbottom) using any methods including blasting or fracturing. Treasure hunting is not allowed in Acropora critical habitat. 8. Johnson’s seagrass critical habitat: Treasure hunting is not allowed in waters less than 12 ft (4 m) deep. Muck dredging is not allowed if the essential features are present. 9. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Critical Habitat: In accordance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, projects proposed within the following areas cannot be authorized until consultation, either individually or programmatically, on the projects have been concluded with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS): Within American crocodile designated critical habitat, Gulf sturgeon designated critical habitat under the jurisdictional responsibility of the USFWS; within the designated critical habitat for federally listed freshwater mussels, and freshwater mussels proposed for listing consisting of the following drainages: Within the main stem, creeks, and tributaries of the following rivers: Escambia (Escambia and Santa Rosa Counties), Yellow (Santa Rosa, Okaloosa, and Walton Counties), Choctawhatchee (Walton, Bay, Washington), Chipola (Jackson, Calhoun, and Gulf Counties), Apalachicola (Jackson, Calhoun, Gadsden, Liberty, Gulf, and Franklin Counties), Ochlockonee (Franklin, Wakulla, Liberty, Leon, and Gadsden Counties), Santa Fe and New (Columbia, Suwannee, Bradford, Baker, Union, Gilchrist, and Alachua Counties), and Econfina Creek and its tributaries (Bay and Washington Counties). 10. Endangered Species Consultation: This permit has undergone consultation with the USFWS and the NMFS, either individually or programmatically, on the listed species and any designated critical habitat noted on Table 1. If the proposed activity requires additional Section 7 consultation under the Endangered Species Act with the USFWS and/or NMFS on: 1) these or any other Federally listed threatened or endangered species or a species proposed for such designation; or 2) designated critical habitat for these or any other Federally listed threatened or endangered species or proposed critical habitat for any Federally
Recommended publications
  • Etoniah Creek State Forest Management Plan
    TEN-YEAR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE ETONIAH CREEK STATE FOREST PUTNAM COUNTY, FLORIDA PREPARED BY THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, FLORIDA FOREST SERVICE APPROVED ON JULY 9, 2015 Land Management Plan Compliance Checklist Etoniah Creek State Forest – April 2015 Section A: Acquisition Information Items Statute/ Page Numbers and/or Item # Requirement Rule Appendix 18-2.018 & Page 1 (Executive Summary); 1. The common name of the property. 18-2.021 Page 2 (I); Page 9 (II.A.1) Page 1 (Executive Summary); The land acquisition program, if any, under which the property 18-2.018 & 2. Page 2 (I); Page 10 (II.A.4); was acquired. 18-2.021 Page 10 (II.B.1) Degree of title interest held by the Board, including 3. 18-2.021 Page 11 (II.B.2) reservations and encumbrances such as leases. 18-2.018 & 4. The legal description and acreage of the property. Page 9 (II.A.2) 18-2.021 A map showing the approximate location and boundaries of 18-2.018 & 5. the property, and the location of any structures or Exhibits B, C, and E 18-2.021 improvements to the property. An assessment as to whether the property, or any portion, 6. 18-2.021 Page 15 (II.D.3) should be declared surplus. Identification of other parcels of land within or immediately Page 14 (II.D.2); 7. adjacent to the property that should be purchased because they 18-2.021 are essential to management of the property. Exhibit F Identification of adjacent land uses that conflict with the 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Dunns Creek State Park Unit Management Plan
    DUNNS CREEK STATE PARK UNIT MANAGEMENT PLAN APPROVED STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Division of Recreation and Parks AUGUST 20, 2004 Department of Environmental Protection Jeb Bush Marjorie Stoneman Douglas Building Colleen M. Castille Governor 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, MS 140 Secretary Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 September 1, 2004 Ms. BryAnne White Office of Park Planning Division of Recreation and Parks 3900 Commonwealth Blvd.; M.S. 525 Tallahassee, Florida 32399 Re: Dunns Creek State Park Lease # 4345 Ms. White: On August 20, 2004, the Acquisition and Restoration Council recommended approval of the Dunns Creek State Park management plan. On September 1, 2004, the Office of Environmental Services, acting as agent for the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund, approved the management plan for Dunns Creek State Park. Pursuant to Section 253.034, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 18-2, Florida Administrative Code this plan’s ten-year update will be due on September 1, 2014. Approval of this land management plan does not waive the authority or jurisdiction of any governmental entity that may have an interest in this project. Implementation of any upland activities proposed by this management plan may require a permit or other authorization from federal and state agencies having regulatory jurisdiction over those particular activities. Please forward copies of all permits to this office upon issuance. Sincerely, Paula L. Allen Paula L. Allen Office of Environmental Services Division of State
    [Show full text]
  • State and Federally Listed Species for Putnam County
    State and Federally Listed Species for Putnam County - Note: Only federally listed plant species are included; “=”means a.k.a.; “SA” means similarity of appearance Scientific Name Common Name State USFWS Habitats Used Amphibians Rana capito Gopher (=crawfish) frog Sp. Spec. Concern Longleaf Pine/Turkey Oak Hills, Sand Pine Scrub, Scrubby Flatwoods, Xeric Oak Hammock (uses ephemeral wetlands for breeding) Birds Aphelocoma coerulescens Florida scrub-jay Threatened Threatened Sand Pine Scrub and Scrubby Flatwoods Aramus guarauna Limpkin Sp. Spec. Concern Mangrove Swamp, Freshwater Marsh & Ponds, Cypress Swamp, Springs, Slough, Sawgrass Marsh, Ruderal (impoundments, canals, sugarcane, etc.) Egretta caerulea Little blue heron Sp. Spec. Concern N. & S. FL Coastal Strand, Wet Prairie or Slough, Freshwater Marsh & Ponds, Mangrove Swamps, Cypress Swamp, Sawgrass Marsh, Salt Marsh, Shrub Bog & Bay Swamp, Ruderal Egretta thula Snowy egret Sp. Spec. Concern N. & S. FL Coastal Strand, Wet Prairie or Slough, Freshwater Marsh & Ponds, Mangrove Swamps, Cypress Swamp, Sawgrass Marsh, Salt Marsh, Shrub Bog & Bay Swamp, Ruderal Egretta tricolor Tricolored (=Louisiana) heron Sp. Spec. Concern N. & S. FL Coastal Strand, Wet Prairie or Slough, Freshwater Marsh & Ponds, Mangrove Swamps, Cypress Swamp, Sawgrass Marsh, Salt Marsh, Shrub Bog & Bay Swamp, Ruderal Eudocimus albus White ibis Sp. Spec. Concern N. & S. FL Coastal Strand, Wet Prairie or Slough, Freshwater Marsh & Ponds, Mangrove Swamps, Cypress Swamp, Sawgrass Marsh, Salt Marsh, Shrub Bog & Bay Swamp, Ruderal Falco peregrinus Peregrine falcon Endangered N. & S. FL Coastal Strands (winter), Various Terrestrial and Ruderal Habitats Falco sparverius paulus Southeastern American kestrel Threatened Open Forests, Clearings, Ruderal, Various Open Habitats Grus canadensis pratensis Florida sandhill crane Threatened N.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 14. Wildlife and Forest Communities 341
    chapteR 14. Wildlife and Forest Communities 341 Chapter 14. Wildlife and Forest communities Margaret Trani Griep and Beverly Collins1 key FindingS • Hotspot areas for plants of concern are Big Bend National Park; the Apalachicola area of the Southern Gulf Coast; • The South has 1,076 native terrestrial vertebrates: 179 Lake Wales Ridge and the area south of Lake Okeechobee amphibians, 525 birds, 176 mammals, and 196 reptiles. in Peninsular Florida; and coastal counties of North Species richness is highest in the Mid-South (856) and Carolina in the Atlantic Coastal Plain. The Appalachian- Coastal Plain (733), reflecting both the large area of these Cumberland highlands also contain plants identified by subregions and the diversity of habitats within them. States as species of concern. • The geography of species richness varies by taxa. • Species, including those of conservation concern, are Amphibians flourish in portions of the Piedmont and imperiled by habitat alteration, isolation, introduction of Appalachian-Cumberland highlands and across the Coastal invasive species, environmental pollutants, commercial Plain. Bird richness is highest along the coastal wetlands of development, human disturbance, and exploitation. the Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico, mammal richness Conditions predicted by the forecasts will magnify these is highest in the Mid-South and Appalachian-Cumberland stressors. Each species varies in its vulnerability to highlands, and reptile richness is highest across the forecasted threats, and these threats vary by subregion. Key southern portion of the region. areas of concern arise where hotspots of vulnerable species • The South has 142 terrestrial vertebrate species coincide with forecasted stressors. considered to be of conservation concern (e.g., global • There are 614 species that are presumed extirpated from conservation status rank of critically imperiled, imperiled, selected States in the South; 64 are terrestrial vertebrates or vulnerable), 77 of which are listed as threatened or and 550 are vascular plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Identification and Phylogenetic Relationship of Some Origanum and Thymus Species Based on ITS Regions
    IOSR Journal of Biotechnology and Biochemistry (IOSR-JBB) ISSN: 2455-264X, Volume 6, Issue 6 (Nov. – Dec. 2020), PP 12-23 www.iosrjournals.org Molecular Identification and Phylogenetic Relationship of some Origanum and Thymus Species Based on ITS Regions Mohamed Zoelfakar Sayed Ahmed1, El-Shaimaa Saad El-Demerdash1 and Shafik Darwish Ibrahim2 1(Genetic Resources Department, Desert Research Center (DRC), 1, Mathaf El-Matariya Street, El-Matariya B.O.P 11753 El-Matariya, Cairo, Egypt.) 2(Molecular Genetics and Genome Mapping Lab., AGERI, ARC, 9 Gamma St., Giza – Cairo 12619, Egypt.) Abstract: Background: Lamiaceae or Labiatae family is one of the major important plant families of multiple usesin aromatic purposes, medicine and food. Oregano (Origanum) and thyme (Thymus) the scope of our study are belonging to familyLamiaceae. Butin spite of their importance, they are poorly identified on the basis of molecular levels three Thymus species (T. vulgaris, T. capitatus and T. decussatus)and two Origanum species (O. vulgareand O. syriacum L., subsp. sinaicum) were chosen for the preset study. Molecular identification and characterization studies based on DNA molecular marker (ITS region) are more precise, reliable and powerful tool to assess the phylogenetic relationships between studied plant species with 17 genera in Lamiaceae family. Materials and Methods:Specific one fragment ofPCR product about 710±15 bp from was produced using the universal primer (ITS1 and ITS4) with highly conserved of ITS regions of rDNA through the 5 samples under study and sequencing of the obtained fragment was conducted. Results:The sequence lengths of the ITS region of three Thymus species were 685bp, 681bp and 680bp with T.
    [Show full text]
  • Dunns Creek State Park Draft Unit Management Plan 2018
    Dunns Creek State Park Advisory Group Draft Unit Management Plan STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Division of Recreation and Parks August 2018 i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PARK ....................................... 1 Park Significance ................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE PLAN..................................................... 2 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW ................................................... 8 Management Authority and Responsibility .............................................. 8 Park Management Goals ...................................................................... 9 Management Coordination ................................................................... 9 Public Participation ............................................................................ 10 Other Designations ........................................................................... 10 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 11 RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT..................................... 13 Natural Resources ............................................................................. 13 Topography .................................................................................. 13 Geology ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conradina Etonia)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska 2007 Identification of compounds from Etonia rosemary (Conradina etonia) Brian P. Quinn United States Department of Agriculture, [email protected] Ulrich R. Bernier University of Florida, [email protected] Matthew M. Booth University of Florida College of Medicine Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub Part of the Agricultural Science Commons Quinn, Brian P.; Bernier, Ulrich R.; and Booth, Matthew M., "Identification of compounds from Etonia rosemary (Conradina etonia)" (2007). Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty. 956. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub/956 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Journal of Chromatography A, 1160 (2007) 306–310 Identification of compounds from Etonia rosemary (Conradina etonia) Brian P. Quinn a,∗, Ulrich R. Bernier a, Matthew M. Booth b a United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Center for Medical, Agricultural, and Veterinary Entomology, 1600 SW 23rd Drive, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA b University of Florida College of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, 1600 SW Archer Road, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA Received 16 March 2007; received in revised form 15 May 2007; accepted 16 May 2007 Available online 25 May 2007 Abstract Mosquitoes transmit pathogens that result in diseases harmful to human, livestock, and wildlife hosts.
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving North America's Threatened Plants
    Conserving North America’s Threatened Plants Progress report on Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Conserving North America’s Threatened Plants Progress report on Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation By Andrea Kramer, Abby Hird, Kirsty Shaw, Michael Dosmann, and Ray Mims January 2011 Recommended ciTaTion: Kramer, A., A. Hird, K. Shaw, M. Dosmann, and R. Mims. 2011. Conserving North America’s Threatened Plants: Progress report on Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation . BoTanic Gardens ConservaTion InTernaTional U.S. Published by BoTanic Gardens ConservaTion InTernaTional U.S. 1000 Lake Cook Road Glencoe, IL 60022 USA www.bgci.org/usa Design: John Morgan, [email protected] Contents Acknowledgements . .3 Foreword . .4 Executive Summary . .5 Chapter 1. The North American Flora . .6 1.1 North America’s plant diversity . .7 1.2 Threats to North America’s plant diversity . .7 1.3 Conservation status and protection of North America’s plants . .8 1.3.1 Regional conservaTion sTaTus and naTional proTecTion . .9 1.3.2 Global conservaTion sTaTus and proTecTion . .10 1.4 Integrated plant conservation . .11 1.4.1 In situ conservaTion . .11 1.4.2 Ex situ collecTions and conservaTion applicaTions . .12 1.4.3 ParameTers of ex situ collecTions for conservaTion . .16 1.5 Global perspective and work on ex situ conservation . .18 1.5.1 Global STraTegy for PlanT ConservaTion, TargeT 8 . .18 Chapter 2. North American Collections Assessment . .19 2.1 Background . .19 2.2 Methodology . .19 2.2.1 Compiling lisTs of ThreaTened NorTh American Taxa .
    [Show full text]
  • Scrub Management Guidelines Page 1 of 51 by Fire As Soon As Is Feasible
    Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission 620 South Meridian Street, Tallahassee, FL 32399 Policy, Position Statement, or Guideline (PPG) TYPE OF PPG: GUIDELINE ORIGIN: FWC ORIGINATED APPROVAL AUTHORITY: DIVISION DIRECTOR ACTION EFFECTIVE DATE: February 25, 2019 Note: This document is subject to update after further review. SUMMARY OF TEXT & PURPOSE FOR THE PPG: This document provides management guidelines for the restoration and management of oak and rosemary scrub habitats in peninsular Florida, defined as the mainland south of an imaginary line from Cedar Key to Jacksonville. These guidelines do not address management of scrub in the panhandle, which differs from that in the peninsular scrub. If followed, these guidelines should benefit most peninsular scrub plant and animal species. Conserving the full suite of species characteristic of scrub requires (1) understanding how a property fits into the regional context for different species and (2) managing for spatial and temporal variability at the local level to create a mosaic of habitat conditions. In oak scrub, managing in a way that benefits the Florida scrub-jay benefits much of scrub-specialized plants and animals, which require a patchy mosaic of low vegetation and open patches of bare sand. In addition to providing habitat management guidelines targeted at Florida scrub-jays, this document contains species-specific management recommendations for state and federally listed species and species of conservation concern. By managing for heterogeneity at local and regional scales, the habitat needs of the complete suite of scrub species can be met, even though the needs of some species are not perfectly aligned with those of the Florida scrub-jay.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Outlook for Florida's Threatened, Endangered, and At
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Conservation Outlook For Florida’s Threatened, Endangered, and At-risk Species U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Conservation Outlook for Florida Ecological Services Offices 1339 20th Street Florida’s Threatened, Endangered, Vero Beach, FL 32960-3559 September 2015 and At-risk Species A snail kite prepares to eat an apple snail. These raptors use their curved beaks to pull their primary prey, apple snails, from their shells. Photo: © Kevan and Linda Sunderland The Mission of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: Working with others to conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Conservation Outlook For Florida’s Threatened, Endangered, and At-risk Species U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Conservation Outlook for Florida Ecological Services Offices 1339 20th Street Florida’s Threatened, Endangered, Vero Beach, FL 32960-3559 September 2015 and At-risk Species A snail kite prepares to eat an apple snail. These raptors use their curved beaks to pull their primary prey, apple snails, from their shells. Photo: © Kevan and Linda Sunderland The Mission of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: Working with others to conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people. Contents State Supervisor’s Foreword State Supervisor’s Foreword....................... 3 Introduction ..................................... 5 Threats to Conservation in Florida ................ 8 Florida’s beauty and mild climate are enjoyed by 19 million residents—a number growing rapidly as 1,000 Recently Extinct Species .........................
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Documents and Settings\Garlanm1\My Documents
    NOTES ON FLORIDA’S ENDANGERED AND THREATENED PLANTS1 4th Edition, August 2003 Nancy C. Coile2 updated by Mark A. Garland3 The following tables were compiled Descriptions of these rare species Distribution maps (Wunderlin and Fish and Wildlife Service; Bruce D. to provide a convenient source of are often difficult to locate. Florida Hansen, 2000) are available over the Sutton, DPI, carnivorous plants; descriptions and other information does not have a single manual Internet from the University of Kathy Craddock Burks, Department on the endangered, threatened and covering the flora of the entire state. South Florida Herbarium of Environmental Protection; Donald commercially exploited plant species Long and Lakela’s manual (1971) [http://www.plantatlas.usf.edu/]. Drapalik, Georgia Southern on Florida’s ‘Regulated Plant focuses on the area south of Glades These maps were invaluable for University, angle-pods; John D. Index.’ County; Clewell (1985) is a guide determining county distributions as Tobe, Department of Environmental for the Panhandle; and Wunderlin was information from the Florida Protection, magnolias; Robert R. The Regulated Plant Index is based (1998) is a guide for the entire state Natural Areas Inventory. Haynes, University of Alabama, on information provided by the of Florida but lacks descriptions. slender naiad. Endangered Plant Advisory Council Small (1933) is an excellent Many thanks are given to: Penny L. (EPAC), a group of seven resource, but must be used with McCurry for help with publishing Update: The Update, which individuals who represent academic, great care since the nomenclature is matters; Sharon E. Gatlin for help immediately follows this industry, and environmental interests outdated and frequently disputed.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Scientist [Vol
    Biological Sciences IN VITRO PROPAGATION OF CONRADINA ETONIA Cheryl L. Peterson 1 and Russell C. Weigel Department of Biological Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL 32901-6975 USA Abstract: Conservation institutions worldwide such as the Royal Botanical Gardens at Kew (U.K.) have frequently used in vitro propagation (micropropagation) as a valuable tool to support the conservation of some threatened and endangered species. Although many of the endemic species of Florida 's scrub ecosystem are extremely rare, they have not been widely researched using tissue culture techniques. In this paper, the amenability of Conradina etonia, an endangered scrub mint species, to in vitro growth and propagation was investigated using shoot tips. Callus formed and grew rapidly in the presence of both cytokinins and auxins. Rhizogenesis from callus occurred in both the presence and absence of growth regulators. Induction of axillary shoots from the main explant stem occurred on media containing 3.0 mg/ L 6-[y,y-dimethylallylamino]purine + 0.3 mg/L indole-3-acetic acid. When excised and placed on fresh media, these shoots produced three to four adventitious shoots each. Subculturing the adventitious shoots onto media devoid of growth regulators resulted in stem elongation, leaf production, and occasionally root formation. The results suggest that micropropagation may be an option for the propagation of this species. Key Words: Organogenesis, micropropagation, in vitro propagation, Con- radina, Florida native plants, conservation The genus Conradina (family Lamiaceae) consists of six allopatric spe- cies of minty aromatic shrubs (C. canescens, C. brevifolia, C. etonia, C. glabra, C. grandiflora, and C. verticillata), characterized by dense hairs on their lower leaf surfaces and by a sharply bent corolla tube in the flowers (USFWS, 1993).
    [Show full text]