DOCSLIB.ORG

Dunns Creek State Park Draft Unit Management Plan 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dunns Creek State Park Draft Unit Management Plan 2018 Dunns Creek State Park Advisory Group Draft Unit Management Plan STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Division of Recreation and Parks August 2018 i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PARK ....................................... 1 Park Significance ................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE PLAN..................................................... 2 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW ................................................... 8 Management Authority and Responsibility .............................................. 8 Park Management Goals ...................................................................... 9 Management Coordination ................................................................... 9 Public Participation ............................................................................ 10 Other Designations ........................................................................... 10 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 11 RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT..................................... 13 Natural Resources ............................................................................. 13 Topography .................................................................................. 13 Geology ....................................................................................... 14 Soils ............................................................................................ 19 Minerals ....................................................................................... 19 Hydrology .................................................................................... 19 Natural Communities (FNAI) ........................................................... 23 Imperiled Species ......................................................................... 47 Exotic and Nuisance Species ........................................................... 48 Special Natural Features ................................................................ 50 Cultural Resources ............................................................................ 50 Condition Assessment .................................................................... 51 Level of Significance ...................................................................... 51 Prehistoric and Historic Archaeological Sites ..................................... 53 Historic Structures ........................................................................ 54 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ................................................. 56 Management Goals, Objectives and Actions .......................................... 56 Natural Resource Management ........................................................... 57 Hydrological Management .............................................................. 57 Natural Communities Management .................................................. 58 Imperiled Species Management ...................................................... 62 Exotic Species Management ........................................................... 63 Cultural Resource Management .......................................................... 64 Special Management Considerations .................................................... 66 Timber Management Analysis ......................................................... 66 Arthropod Control Plan ................................................................... 66 Resource Management Schedule ......................................................... 66 ii Land Management Review ................................................................. 66 LAND USE COMPONENT INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 69 EXTERNAL CONDITIONS .................................................................... 69 Existing Use of Adjacent Lands ........................................................... 71 Planned Use of Adjacent Lands ........................................................... 71 Florida Greenways and Trails System .................................................. 72 PROPERTY ANALYSIS ........................................................................ 73 Recreation Resource Elements ............................................................ 73 Land Area .................................................................................... 73 Water Area ................................................................................... 74 Shoreline ..................................................................................... 74 Natural Scenery ............................................................................ 74 Significant Habitat ......................................................................... 74 Archaeological and Historic Features ................................................ 74 Assessment of Use ............................................................................ 75 Past Uses ..................................................................................... 75 Future Land Use and Zoning ........................................................... 75 Current Recreation Use and Visitor Programs .................................... 76 Other Uses ................................................................................... 76 Protected Zones ............................................................................ 76 Existing Facilities .............................................................................. 79 Recreation Facilities ....................................................................... 79 Support Facilities .......................................................................... 79 CONCEPTUAL LAND USE PLAN ........................................................... 80 Potential Uses .................................................................................. 80 Public Access and Recreational Opportunities .................................... 80 Proposed Facilities ............................................................................ 84 Capital Facilities and Infrastructure ................................................. 84 Facilities Development ....................................................................... 87 Existing Use and Optimum Carrying Capacity ....................................... 88 Optimum Boundary ........................................................................... 89 IMPLEMENTATION COMPONENT MANAGEMENT PROGRESS .................................................................. 93 Park Administration and Operations .................................................... 93 Resource Management ................................................................... 93 Natural Resources ......................................................................... 93 Cultural Resources ........................................................................ 94 Recreation and Visitor Services ........................................................... 94 Park Facilities ................................................................................... 94 MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION ............................................ 94 iii TABLES TABLE 1 –Dunns Creek State Park Management Zones ............................ 12 TABLE 2 – Imperiled Species Inventory .................................................. 46 TABLE 3 – Inventory of FLEPPC Category I and II Exotic Plant Species ....... 49 TABLE 4 – Cultural Sites Listed in the Florida Master Site File ................... 55 TABLE 5 – Prescribed Fire Management .................................................. 58 TABLE 6 – Resource-Based Recreational Opportunities Nearby .................. 70 TABLE 7 – Existing Use and Recreational Carrying Capacity ...................... 89 TABLE 8 – Implementation Schedule and Cost Estimates.......................... 95 MAPS Vicinity Map ...........................................................................................3 Reference Map .......................................................................................5 Management Zones Map........................................................................ 15 Topography Map .................................................................................. 17 Soils Map ............................................................................................ 21 Natural Communities Map ...................................................................... 25 Base Map ............................................................................................ 77 Conceptual Land Use Plan ...................................................................... 81 Optimum Boundary Map ........................................................................ 91 LIST OF ADDENDA ADDENDUM 1 Acquisition History ....................................................................... A 1 - 1 ADDENDUM 2 Advisory Group Members and Report ............................................. A 2 - 1 ADDENDUM 3 References Cited ......................................................................... A 3 - 1 ADDENDUM 4 Soil Descriptions ......................................................................... A 4 - 1 ADDENDUM 5 Plant and Animal
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Epiphytic Lichens and Lichenicolous Fungi From
    LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004EPIPHYTIC LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LICHENS LJL©2004 AND LJL©2004 LICHENICOLOUS LJL©2004 LJL©2004 FUNGI LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004FROM LJL©2004 BAHÍA LJL©2004 HONDA LJL©2004 (VERAGUAS, LJL©2004 LJL©2004 PANAMA) LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004
    [Show full text]
  • Price's Scrub State Park
    Price’s Scrub State Park Advisory Group Draft Unit Management Plan STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Division of Recreation and Parks September 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PARK ....................................... 1 Park Significance ................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE PLAN..................................................... 2 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW ................................................... 7 Management Authority and Responsibility .............................................. 7 Park Management Goals ...................................................................... 8 Management Coordination ................................................................... 9 Public Participation ..............................................................................9 Other Designations .............................................................................9 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 11 RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT..................................... 12 Natural Resources ............................................................................. 12 Topography .................................................................................. 12 Geology ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Putnam County Conservation Element Data & Analysis
    Putnam County COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSERVATION ELEMENT EAR-based Amendments Putnam County 2509 Crill Avenue, Suite 300 Palatka, FL 32178 Putnam County Conservation Element Data & Analysis Putnam County Conservation Element Table of Contents Section Page I. Introduction 4 II. Inventory of Natural Resources 5 A. Surface Water Resources 5 1. Lakes and Prairies 5 2. Rivers and Creeks 8 3. Water Quality 10 4. Surface Water Improvement and Management Act (SWIM) 15 5. Analysis of Surface Water Resources 16 B. Groundwater Resources 17 1. Aquifers 17 2. Recharge Areas 18 3. Cones of Influence 18 4. Contaminated Well Sites 18 5. Alternate Sources of Water Supply 19 6. Water Needs and Sources 21 7. Analysis of Groundwater Resources 22 C. Wetlands 23 1. General Description of Wetlands 23 2. Impacts to Wetlands 25 3. Analysis of Wetlands 26 D. Floodplains 26 1. National Flood Insurance Program 26 2. Drainage Basins 26 3. Flooding 29 4. Analysis of Floodplains 30 E. Fisheries, Wildlife, Marine Habitats, and Vegetative Communities 30 1. Fisheries 30 2. Vegetative Communities 30 3. Environmentally Sensitive Lands 35 4. Wildlife Species 55 5. Marine Habitat 57 6. Analysis of Environmentally Sensitive Lands 58 F. Air Resources 58 1. Particulate Matter (PM) 58 2. Sulfur Dioxide 59 3. Nitrogen Oxides 60 4. Total Reduced Sulfur Compounds 60 5. Other Pollutants 61 6. Analysis of Air Resources 61 EAR-based Amendments 10/26/10 E-1 Putnam County Conservation Element Data & Analysis G. Areas Known to Experience Soil Erosion 62 1. Potential for Erosion 62 2. Analysis of Soil Erosion 64 H.
    [Show full text]
  • Etoniah Creek State Forest Management Plan
    TEN-YEAR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE ETONIAH CREEK STATE FOREST PUTNAM COUNTY, FLORIDA PREPARED BY THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, FLORIDA FOREST SERVICE APPROVED ON JULY 9, 2015 Land Management Plan Compliance Checklist Etoniah Creek State Forest – April 2015 Section A: Acquisition Information Items Statute/ Page Numbers and/or Item # Requirement Rule Appendix 18-2.018 & Page 1 (Executive Summary); 1. The common name of the property. 18-2.021 Page 2 (I); Page 9 (II.A.1) Page 1 (Executive Summary); The land acquisition program, if any, under which the property 18-2.018 & 2. Page 2 (I); Page 10 (II.A.4); was acquired. 18-2.021 Page 10 (II.B.1) Degree of title interest held by the Board, including 3. 18-2.021 Page 11 (II.B.2) reservations and encumbrances such as leases. 18-2.018 & 4. The legal description and acreage of the property. Page 9 (II.A.2) 18-2.021 A map showing the approximate location and boundaries of 18-2.018 & 5. the property, and the location of any structures or Exhibits B, C, and E 18-2.021 improvements to the property. An assessment as to whether the property, or any portion, 6. 18-2.021 Page 15 (II.D.3) should be declared surplus. Identification of other parcels of land within or immediately Page 14 (II.D.2); 7. adjacent to the property that should be purchased because they 18-2.021 are essential to management of the property. Exhibit F Identification of adjacent land uses that conflict with the 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Gopher Frog Genetics Final Report
    Genetic Assessment of Gopher Frog Populations in Florida Final Report KEVIN M. ENGE, Principal Investigator Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, Lovett E. Williams, Jr. Wildlife Research Laboratory, 1105 SW Williston Road, Gainesville, Florida 32601 Co-Principal Investigators: THOMAS J. DEVITT Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, The University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station #C0930, Austin, TX 78712 ANNA L. FARMER Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, Lovett E. Williams, Jr. Wildlife Research Laboratory, 1105 SW Williston Road, Gainesville, Florida 32601 STACEY LANCE University of Georgia, Savanna River Ecology Laboratory, PO Drawer E, Aiken, South Carolina 29802 STEPHEN C. RICHTER Eastern Kentucky University, Department of Biological Sciences, 521 Lancaster Avenue, Richmond, Kentucky 40475 PETER BEERLI Florida State University, Department of Scientific Computing, Tallahassee, Florida 32306 Florida State Wildlife Grants Project ID 9272 251 1159 Dates Covered: July 1, 2013 – December 31, 2016 Date Submitted: February 1, 2017 Enge et al. Gopher Frog Genetics ABSTRACT Florida represents the last stronghold for the gopher frog, Rana (=Lithobates) capito, which has experienced serious declines in the rest of its range. Florida gopher frog populations have also experienced declines, particularly in the panhandle, primarily due to habitat degradation and reduction of gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) populations. Understanding gene flow and genetic diversity is necessary to determine whether populations will remain viable over time and whether additional management actions are needed in cases where populations have become isolated due to manmade barriers. The first objective of this study was to determine the amount of gene flow and degree of genetic variation among populations in 15 different geographical locations of known or suspected occupancy (areas of occupancy or AOs) that may be genetically isolated by natural or manmade barriers.
    [Show full text]
  • Dunns Creek State Park Unit Management Plan
    DUNNS CREEK STATE PARK UNIT MANAGEMENT PLAN APPROVED STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Division of Recreation and Parks AUGUST 20, 2004 Department of Environmental Protection Jeb Bush Marjorie Stoneman Douglas Building Colleen M. Castille Governor 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, MS 140 Secretary Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 September 1, 2004 Ms. BryAnne White Office of Park Planning Division of Recreation and Parks 3900 Commonwealth Blvd.; M.S. 525 Tallahassee, Florida 32399 Re: Dunns Creek State Park Lease # 4345 Ms. White: On August 20, 2004, the Acquisition and Restoration Council recommended approval of the Dunns Creek State Park management plan. On September 1, 2004, the Office of Environmental Services, acting as agent for the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund, approved the management plan for Dunns Creek State Park. Pursuant to Section 253.034, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 18-2, Florida Administrative Code this plan’s ten-year update will be due on September 1, 2014. Approval of this land management plan does not waive the authority or jurisdiction of any governmental entity that may have an interest in this project. Implementation of any upland activities proposed by this management plan may require a permit or other authorization from federal and state agencies having regulatory jurisdiction over those particular activities. Please forward copies of all permits to this office upon issuance. Sincerely, Paula L. Allen Paula L. Allen Office of Environmental Services Division of State
    [Show full text]
  • Bat Fungus Takes Its Toll on the Little Guys in Early 2006, a Caver Noticed and Photographed What Appeared to Be a Fine White Mass on Bats in Howe’S Cave in New York
    50:3 N ⁄ D 2009 .. Bat Fungus Takes Its Toll on the Little Guys In early 2006, a caver noticed and photographed what appeared to be a fine white mass on bats in Howe’s Cave in New York. Within a year biologists at the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation documented the condition and gave it the name “white-nose syndrome” (WNS) because the fine white fungal mat appeared around the faces of some bats. In fact, the fungus was found to have invaded deep into the skin and wings of many bats. WNS appears to be responsible for killing large numbers of bats. In some caves the losses are between 90 and 100 percent! The white-nose syndrome has subsequently been identified in other northeastern states: Connecticut, Massachusetts, Maine, and Vermont. This winter WNS was confirmed in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Virginia. Recent news reports state that the fungus has been found on bats in the state of Delaware. In an effort to halt or at least restrict the spread of the fungus among bats, the United States Forest Service, Department of Agriculture, and the Fish & Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior, have closed thousands of caves and abandoned mines (where bats are known to hibernate) located on federal lands and requested a voluntary moratorium on recreational activities in caves in 17 states. (Continued on page 7) Above right: Close-up of In This Issue white-nose syndrome. Photo provided by Marc Bosch, U.S. From the President...................... 2 Field Service (Department of Agriculture). Alberta’s Mushroom ..................
    [Show full text]
  • Piedmont Lichen Inventory
    PIEDMONT LICHEN INVENTORY: BUILDING A LICHEN BIODIVERSITY BASELINE FOR THE PIEDMONT ECOREGION OF NORTH CAROLINA, USA By Gary B. Perlmutter B.S. Zoology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA 1991 A Thesis Submitted to the Staff of The North Carolina Botanical Garden University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Advisor: Dr. Johnny Randall As Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements For the Certificate in Native Plant Studies 15 May 2009 Perlmutter – Piedmont Lichen Inventory Page 2 This Final Project, whose results are reported herein with sections also published in the scientific literature, is dedicated to Daniel G. Perlmutter, who urged that I return to academia. And to Theresa, Nichole and Dakota, for putting up with my passion in lichenology, which brought them from southern California to the Traingle of North Carolina. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………….4 Chapter I: The North Carolina Lichen Checklist…………………………………………………7 Chapter II: Herbarium Surveys and Initiation of a New Lichen Collection in the University of North Carolina Herbarium (NCU)………………………………………………………..9 Chapter III: Preparatory Field Surveys I: Battle Park and Rock Cliff Farm……………………13 Chapter IV: Preparatory Field Surveys II: State Park Forays…………………………………..17 Chapter V: Lichen Biota of Mason Farm Biological Reserve………………………………….19 Chapter VI: Additional Piedmont Lichen Surveys: Uwharrie Mountains…………………...…22 Chapter VII: A Revised Lichen Inventory of North Carolina Piedmont …..…………………...23 Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………………..72 Appendices………………………………………………………………………………….…..73 Perlmutter – Piedmont Lichen Inventory Page 4 INTRODUCTION Lichens are composite organisms, consisting of a fungus (the mycobiont) and a photosynthesising alga and/or cyanobacterium (the photobiont), which together make a life form that is distinct from either partner in isolation (Brodo et al.
    [Show full text]
  • State and Federally Listed Species for Putnam County
    State and Federally Listed Species for Putnam County - Note: Only federally listed plant species are included; “=”means a.k.a.; “SA” means similarity of appearance Scientific Name Common Name State USFWS Habitats Used Amphibians Rana capito Gopher (=crawfish) frog Sp. Spec. Concern Longleaf Pine/Turkey Oak Hills, Sand Pine Scrub, Scrubby Flatwoods, Xeric Oak Hammock (uses ephemeral wetlands for breeding) Birds Aphelocoma coerulescens Florida scrub-jay Threatened Threatened Sand Pine Scrub and Scrubby Flatwoods Aramus guarauna Limpkin Sp. Spec. Concern Mangrove Swamp, Freshwater Marsh & Ponds, Cypress Swamp, Springs, Slough, Sawgrass Marsh, Ruderal (impoundments, canals, sugarcane, etc.) Egretta caerulea Little blue heron Sp. Spec. Concern N. & S. FL Coastal Strand, Wet Prairie or Slough, Freshwater Marsh & Ponds, Mangrove Swamps, Cypress Swamp, Sawgrass Marsh, Salt Marsh, Shrub Bog & Bay Swamp, Ruderal Egretta thula Snowy egret Sp. Spec. Concern N. & S. FL Coastal Strand, Wet Prairie or Slough, Freshwater Marsh & Ponds, Mangrove Swamps, Cypress Swamp, Sawgrass Marsh, Salt Marsh, Shrub Bog & Bay Swamp, Ruderal Egretta tricolor Tricolored (=Louisiana) heron Sp. Spec. Concern N. & S. FL Coastal Strand, Wet Prairie or Slough, Freshwater Marsh & Ponds, Mangrove Swamps, Cypress Swamp, Sawgrass Marsh, Salt Marsh, Shrub Bog & Bay Swamp, Ruderal Eudocimus albus White ibis Sp. Spec. Concern N. & S. FL Coastal Strand, Wet Prairie or Slough, Freshwater Marsh & Ponds, Mangrove Swamps, Cypress Swamp, Sawgrass Marsh, Salt Marsh, Shrub Bog & Bay Swamp, Ruderal Falco peregrinus Peregrine falcon Endangered N. & S. FL Coastal Strands (winter), Various Terrestrial and Ruderal Habitats Falco sparverius paulus Southeastern American kestrel Threatened Open Forests, Clearings, Ruderal, Various Open Habitats Grus canadensis pratensis Florida sandhill crane Threatened N.
    [Show full text]
  • House Districts (This Compilation Was Produced by the Florida State Parks Foundation, January 2019)
    Florida State Parks FY 2017-18 Data by 2019 House Districts (This compilation was produced by the Florida State Parks Foundation, January 2019) . State Wide Totals • 175 Florida State Parks and Trails (164 Parks / 11 Trails) comprising nearly 800,000 Acres • $2.4 billion direct economic impact • $158 million in sales tax revenue • 33,587 jobs supported • Over 28 million visitors served # of Economic Jobs Park House Districts Parks Impact Supported Visitors 1 Hill, Walter Bryan “Mike” 0 2 Andre, Robert Alexander “Alex” 3 28,135,146 393 338,807 Big Lagoon State Park 12,155,746 170 141,517 Perdido Key State Park 12,739,427 178 157,126 Tarklin Bayou Preserve State Park 3,239,973 45 40,164 3 Williamson, Jayer 3 22,545,992 315 275,195 Blackwater Heritage State Trail 15,301,348 214 188,630 Blackwater River State Park 6,361,036 89 75,848 Yellow River Marsh Preserve State Park 883,608 12 10,717 4 Ponder, Mel 2 46,877,022 657 564,936 Fred Gannon Rocky Bayou State Park 7,896,093 111 88,633 Henderson Beach State Park 38,980,929 546 476,303 5 Drake, Brad 9 75,811,647 1062 881,589 Camp Helen State Park 2,778,378 39 31,704 Deer Lake State Park 1,654,544 23 19,939 Eden Gardens State Park 3,298,681 46 39,601 Falling Waters State Park 5,761,074 81 67,225 Florida Caverns State Park 12,217,659 171 135,677 Grayton Beach State Park 20,250,255 284 236,181 Ponce de Leon Springs State Park 4,745,495 66 57,194 Three Rivers State Park 3,465,975 49 39,482 Topsail Hill Preserve State Park 21,639,586 303 254,586 6 Trumbull, Jay 2 76,186,412 1,067 926,162 Camp Helen State Park 2,778,378 39 31,704 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Fungal Diversity in Lichens: from Extremotolerance to Interactions with Algae
    life Review Fungal Diversity in Lichens: From Extremotolerance to Interactions with Algae Lucia Muggia 1,* ID and Martin Grube 2 1 Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, via Licio Giorgieri 10, 34127 Trieste, Italy 2 Institute of Biology, Karl-Franzens University of Graz, Holteigasse 6, 8010 Graz, Austria; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +39-040-558-8825 Received: 11 April 2018; Accepted: 21 May 2018; Published: 22 May 2018 Abstract: Lichen symbioses develop long-living thallus structures even in the harshest environments on Earth. These structures are also habitats for many other microscopic organisms, including other fungi, which vary in their specificity and interaction with the whole symbiotic system. This contribution reviews the recent progress regarding the understanding of the lichen-inhabiting fungi that are achieved by multiphasic approaches (culturing, microscopy, and sequencing). The lichen mycobiome comprises a more or less specific pool of species that can develop symptoms on their hosts, a generalist environmental pool, and a pool of transient species. Typically, the fungal classes Dothideomycetes, Eurotiomycetes, Leotiomycetes, Sordariomycetes, and Tremellomycetes predominate the associated fungal communities. While symptomatic lichenicolous fungi belong to lichen-forming lineages, many of the other fungi that are found have close relatives that are known from different ecological niches, including both plant and animal pathogens, and rock colonizers. A significant fraction of yet unnamed melanized (‘black’) fungi belong to the classes Chaethothyriomycetes and Dothideomycetes. These lineages tolerate the stressful conditions and harsh environments that affect their hosts, and therefore are interpreted as extremotolerant fungi. Some of these taxa can also form lichen-like associations with the algae of the lichen system when they are enforced to symbiosis by co-culturing assays.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 14. Wildlife and Forest Communities 341
    chapteR 14. Wildlife and Forest Communities 341 Chapter 14. Wildlife and Forest communities Margaret Trani Griep and Beverly Collins1 key FindingS • Hotspot areas for plants of concern are Big Bend National Park; the Apalachicola area of the Southern Gulf Coast; • The South has 1,076 native terrestrial vertebrates: 179 Lake Wales Ridge and the area south of Lake Okeechobee amphibians, 525 birds, 176 mammals, and 196 reptiles. in Peninsular Florida; and coastal counties of North Species richness is highest in the Mid-South (856) and Carolina in the Atlantic Coastal Plain. The Appalachian- Coastal Plain (733), reflecting both the large area of these Cumberland highlands also contain plants identified by subregions and the diversity of habitats within them. States as species of concern. • The geography of species richness varies by taxa. • Species, including those of conservation concern, are Amphibians flourish in portions of the Piedmont and imperiled by habitat alteration, isolation, introduction of Appalachian-Cumberland highlands and across the Coastal invasive species, environmental pollutants, commercial Plain. Bird richness is highest along the coastal wetlands of development, human disturbance, and exploitation. the Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico, mammal richness Conditions predicted by the forecasts will magnify these is highest in the Mid-South and Appalachian-Cumberland stressors. Each species varies in its vulnerability to highlands, and reptile richness is highest across the forecasted threats, and these threats vary by subregion. Key southern portion of the region. areas of concern arise where hotspots of vulnerable species • The South has 142 terrestrial vertebrate species coincide with forecasted stressors. considered to be of conservation concern (e.g., global • There are 614 species that are presumed extirpated from conservation status rank of critically imperiled, imperiled, selected States in the South; 64 are terrestrial vertebrates or vulnerable), 77 of which are listed as threatened or and 550 are vascular plants.
    [Show full text]