DOCSLIB.ORG

Epiphytic Lichens and Lichenicolous Fungi From

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Epiphytic Lichens and Lichenicolous Fungi From LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004EPIPHYTIC LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LICHENS LJL©2004 AND LJL©2004 LICHENICOLOUS LJL©2004 LJL©2004 FUNGI LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004FROM LJL©2004 BAHÍA LJL©2004 HONDA LJL©2004 (VERAGUAS, LJL©2004 LJL©2004 PANAMA) LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004Javier LJL©2004Etayo LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004& LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004André Aptroot LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004Abstract LJL©2004: 67 epiphytic LJL©2004 lichen LJL©2004 species andLJL©2004 4 lichenicolous LJL©2004 fungiLJL©2004 are recorded LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004from Bahía LJL©2004 Honda LJL©2004(Veraguas, LJL©2004 Panamá). LJL©2004 The fungus LJL©2004 Opegrapha LJL©2004 pigozziana LJL©2004 is LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004described LJL©2004 as new, LJL©2004 being LJL©2004a parasimbiont LJL©2004 of LJL©2004 Thelotrema LJL©2004 glaucopallens LJL©2004. LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004Anisomeridium LJL©2004 consobrinum LJL©2004 LJL©2004, A. indicum LJL©2004, Arthopyrenia LJL©2004 LJL©2004 malaccitula LJL©2004 and LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004Calopadia LJL©2004 subcoerulescens LJL©2004 are LJL©2004 reported LJL©2004 for the first LJL©2004 time from LJL©2004 America. LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004Introduction LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004One LJL©2004 of the most LJL©2004 continuously LJL©2004 repeated LJL©2004 feature LJL©2004 of the tropicalLJL©2004 forest LJL©2004 is its LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004extraordinary LJL©2004 biodiversity. LJL©2004 It isLJL©2004 estimated LJL©2004 that more LJL©2004 than half LJL©2004 of the plant LJL©2004 and LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004animal species LJL©2004 are LJL©2004found in tropical LJL©2004 rain LJL©2004 forests though LJL©2004 they LJL©2004only represent LJL©2004 6% LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004of the emerged LJL©2004 surface. LJL©2004 A high LJL©2004 percentage LJL©2004 of these LJL©2004 species is LJL©2004 still unknown LJL©2004 and LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004the number LJL©2004 is higher LJL©2004 with LJL©2004regard to LJL©2004 the smaller LJL©2004 and LJL©2004less conspicuous LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004organism LJL©2004s. The fungal LJL©2004 world, LJL©2004and for extension LJL©2004 lichens LJL©2004 -that LJL©2004 are fungi LJL©2004that can LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004trap the energy LJL©2004 produced LJL©2004 in excess LJL©2004 by algae-, LJL©2004 is just LJL©2004 starting toLJL©2004 be known. LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004These LJL©2004 symbiotic LJL©2004 fungi, LJL©2004 -that can LJL©2004 live on allLJL©2004 type of LJL©2004substrate LJL©2004 without LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004destructing LJL©2004 it-, mainly LJL©2004 colonize LJL©2004 the leaves LJL©2004 of trees inLJL©2004 the lowland LJL©2004 forests, LJL©2004 like the LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004ones we LJL©2004 treat in thisLJL©2004 article. LJL©2004 Lichens LJL©2004living in theseLJL©2004 niches LJL©2004 are known LJL©2004 as LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004epiphyte LJL©2004or folicolous LJL©2004 and as LJL©2004 the main LJL©2004 feature LJL©2004of the humid LJL©2004 forests LJL©2004 is the LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©20041 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 abundanceLJL©2004 LJL©2004 of leaves LJL©2004 and frondes, LJL©2004 one can LJL©2004 imagine LJL©2004 the high LJL©2004 abundance LJL©2004 and LJL©2004 LJL©2004 diversityLJL©2004 of LJL©2004 these organisms. LJL©2004 A LJL©2004 second important LJL©2004 feature LJL©2004 for LJL©2004lichenologists LJL©2004 of LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 temperateLJL©2004 LJL©2004areas is the LJL©2004 lack of LJL©2004lichens in LJL©2004barks and LJL©2004 stones inside LJL©2004 the tropical LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 forest.LJL©2004 It seems LJL©2004 that LJL©2004 in the very LJL©2004 humid LJL©2004areas together LJL©2004 with LJL©2004the absence LJL©2004 of LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 sunlightLJL©2004 makes LJL©2004 this type LJL©2004 of licheniolous LJL©2004 fungi LJL©2004 not as successfulLJL©2004 LJL©2004when competing LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 withLJL©2004 bryophytes LJL©2004 and epiphyticLJL©2004 algae.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Price's Scrub State Park
    Price’s Scrub State Park Advisory Group Draft Unit Management Plan STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Division of Recreation and Parks September 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PARK ....................................... 1 Park Significance ................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE PLAN..................................................... 2 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW ................................................... 7 Management Authority and Responsibility .............................................. 7 Park Management Goals ...................................................................... 8 Management Coordination ................................................................... 9 Public Participation ..............................................................................9 Other Designations .............................................................................9 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 11 RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT..................................... 12 Natural Resources ............................................................................. 12 Topography .................................................................................. 12 Geology ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bat Fungus Takes Its Toll on the Little Guys in Early 2006, a Caver Noticed and Photographed What Appeared to Be a Fine White Mass on Bats in Howe’S Cave in New York
    50:3 N ⁄ D 2009 .. Bat Fungus Takes Its Toll on the Little Guys In early 2006, a caver noticed and photographed what appeared to be a fine white mass on bats in Howe’s Cave in New York. Within a year biologists at the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation documented the condition and gave it the name “white-nose syndrome” (WNS) because the fine white fungal mat appeared around the faces of some bats. In fact, the fungus was found to have invaded deep into the skin and wings of many bats. WNS appears to be responsible for killing large numbers of bats. In some caves the losses are between 90 and 100 percent! The white-nose syndrome has subsequently been identified in other northeastern states: Connecticut, Massachusetts, Maine, and Vermont. This winter WNS was confirmed in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Virginia. Recent news reports state that the fungus has been found on bats in the state of Delaware. In an effort to halt or at least restrict the spread of the fungus among bats, the United States Forest Service, Department of Agriculture, and the Fish & Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior, have closed thousands of caves and abandoned mines (where bats are known to hibernate) located on federal lands and requested a voluntary moratorium on recreational activities in caves in 17 states. (Continued on page 7) Above right: Close-up of In This Issue white-nose syndrome. Photo provided by Marc Bosch, U.S. From the President...................... 2 Field Service (Department of Agriculture). Alberta’s Mushroom ..................
    [Show full text]
  • Piedmont Lichen Inventory
    PIEDMONT LICHEN INVENTORY: BUILDING A LICHEN BIODIVERSITY BASELINE FOR THE PIEDMONT ECOREGION OF NORTH CAROLINA, USA By Gary B. Perlmutter B.S. Zoology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA 1991 A Thesis Submitted to the Staff of The North Carolina Botanical Garden University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Advisor: Dr. Johnny Randall As Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements For the Certificate in Native Plant Studies 15 May 2009 Perlmutter – Piedmont Lichen Inventory Page 2 This Final Project, whose results are reported herein with sections also published in the scientific literature, is dedicated to Daniel G. Perlmutter, who urged that I return to academia. And to Theresa, Nichole and Dakota, for putting up with my passion in lichenology, which brought them from southern California to the Traingle of North Carolina. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………….4 Chapter I: The North Carolina Lichen Checklist…………………………………………………7 Chapter II: Herbarium Surveys and Initiation of a New Lichen Collection in the University of North Carolina Herbarium (NCU)………………………………………………………..9 Chapter III: Preparatory Field Surveys I: Battle Park and Rock Cliff Farm……………………13 Chapter IV: Preparatory Field Surveys II: State Park Forays…………………………………..17 Chapter V: Lichen Biota of Mason Farm Biological Reserve………………………………….19 Chapter VI: Additional Piedmont Lichen Surveys: Uwharrie Mountains…………………...…22 Chapter VII: A Revised Lichen Inventory of North Carolina Piedmont …..…………………...23 Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………………..72 Appendices………………………………………………………………………………….…..73 Perlmutter – Piedmont Lichen Inventory Page 4 INTRODUCTION Lichens are composite organisms, consisting of a fungus (the mycobiont) and a photosynthesising alga and/or cyanobacterium (the photobiont), which together make a life form that is distinct from either partner in isolation (Brodo et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Fungal Diversity in Lichens: from Extremotolerance to Interactions with Algae
    life Review Fungal Diversity in Lichens: From Extremotolerance to Interactions with Algae Lucia Muggia 1,* ID and Martin Grube 2 1 Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, via Licio Giorgieri 10, 34127 Trieste, Italy 2 Institute of Biology, Karl-Franzens University of Graz, Holteigasse 6, 8010 Graz, Austria; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +39-040-558-8825 Received: 11 April 2018; Accepted: 21 May 2018; Published: 22 May 2018 Abstract: Lichen symbioses develop long-living thallus structures even in the harshest environments on Earth. These structures are also habitats for many other microscopic organisms, including other fungi, which vary in their specificity and interaction with the whole symbiotic system. This contribution reviews the recent progress regarding the understanding of the lichen-inhabiting fungi that are achieved by multiphasic approaches (culturing, microscopy, and sequencing). The lichen mycobiome comprises a more or less specific pool of species that can develop symptoms on their hosts, a generalist environmental pool, and a pool of transient species. Typically, the fungal classes Dothideomycetes, Eurotiomycetes, Leotiomycetes, Sordariomycetes, and Tremellomycetes predominate the associated fungal communities. While symptomatic lichenicolous fungi belong to lichen-forming lineages, many of the other fungi that are found have close relatives that are known from different ecological niches, including both plant and animal pathogens, and rock colonizers. A significant fraction of yet unnamed melanized (‘black’) fungi belong to the classes Chaethothyriomycetes and Dothideomycetes. These lineages tolerate the stressful conditions and harsh environments that affect their hosts, and therefore are interpreted as extremotolerant fungi. Some of these taxa can also form lichen-like associations with the algae of the lichen system when they are enforced to symbiosis by co-culturing assays.
    [Show full text]
  • Paul Stamets and Dusty Yao Donate to Mycoflora
    Volume 58:2 March-April 2018 www.namyco.org Paul Stamets and Dusty Yao Donate to Mycoflora by David Rust Photo by Louie Schwartzberg by Louie Photo "We are honored to be able to give this modest contribution to help advance the study of mycology through the Mycoflora initiative.... Live long and sporulate !" We were thrilled to learn of a $10,000 donation by Paul Stamets and Dusty Yao to NAMA to support the North American Mycoflora Project. This contribution builds on the $24,000 matching fund set up by the Mycological Society of America and recent contributions to the matching fund by affiliated clubs and NAMA. Everyone accepts that the North American Mycoflora Project has been stalled since its inception in 2012 due to lack of funding. Substantive gifts like this not only give the work a short-term boost, but also establish a track record when applying for future fundraising. Dr. Tom Bruns at UC Berkeley has estimated that to complete a project of this size, $14-16 million will be needed. The Stamets-Yao gift will be designated for sequencing, offered by the lab of Dr. Todd Osmundson at the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, and the lab of Dr. Rytas Vilgalys at Duke University in North Carolina. Sequencing is just the beginning, of course, with a next step of uploading data to a public website like GenBank to make this research available. Fungi Perfecti founder and president Paul Stamets has been a dedicated mycologist for over 40 years. Over this time, he has discovered and coauthored several new species of mushrooms, and pioneered countless techniques in the field of mushroom cultivation.
    [Show full text]
  • (Thallus) of a Lichen Photobiont(S) for Survival the Basic Structure of a Lichen Is Like That of the Popular Peanut Butter Cup Candy
    ENY-2051 The Life of Lichen1 James Stevenson, Lara B. Milligan, and Jennifer L. Gillett-Kaufman2 Florida is home to a vast diversity of an amazing group tentacles of a sea anemone. The brightly colored clownfish of organisms called lichens. What are these organisms? acts as a lure that draws other fish into the deadly tentacles. They are neither a plant nor an animal, but they are living, The clownfish’s immunity to the anemone’s toxin allows it breathing, reproducing, and complex organisms, the result a safe place to live while feeding on scraps of food left over of a seemingly impossible relationship. from the anemone. The anemone gets the advantage of a live-in fish lure. There is a saying that goes: “Freddie Fungus and Alice Alga took a lichen for each other,” but it is a bit more complicated than two different organisms, a fungus and an alga, coexist- ing. Lichens are composed of several organisms from three different kingdoms: fungi, plants, and bacteria. Figure 2. Jester lichen (Cladonia leporina). Credits: J. Stevenson, UF/IFAS Lichens are a bit different. The algal component of a lichen Figure 1. Tree trunk with many lichen species. Credits: J. Stevenson, UF/IFAS can survive outside of the relationship, while the fungal component cannot. Therefore, rather than a mutually The association of these separate organisms is often referred beneficial relationship, there are signs that the fungus is to as a mutualistic relationship, defined as two or more actually taking nutrients away from the alga, or parasitizing organisms living in a mutually beneficial arrangement.
    [Show full text]
  • Dunns Creek State Park Draft Unit Management Plan 2018
    Dunns Creek State Park Advisory Group Draft Unit Management Plan STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Division of Recreation and Parks August 2018 i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PARK ....................................... 1 Park Significance ................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE PLAN..................................................... 2 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW ................................................... 8 Management Authority and Responsibility .............................................. 8 Park Management Goals ...................................................................... 9 Management Coordination ................................................................... 9 Public Participation ............................................................................ 10 Other Designations ........................................................................... 10 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 11 RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT..................................... 13 Natural Resources ............................................................................. 13 Topography .................................................................................. 13 Geology ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ruth B. Kirby Gilchrist Blue Springs State Park
    RUTH B. KIRBY GILCHRIST BLUE SPRINGS STATE PARK Advisory Group Draft Unit Management Plan Department of Environmental Protection Division of Recreation and Parks State of Florida October 2019 Limestone Outcrop 0.07 RUTH B. KIRBY GILCHRIST Successional Hardwood Forest 40.30 BLUE SPRINGS STATE PARK UNIT MANAGEMENT PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Sinkhole Lake 0.16 Florida’s newest state park, Gilchrist Blue Springs is well-known for Abandoned Field/Pasture 31.57 outstanding water clarity of its springs and renowned for its support of a Burrow Area 0.07 diversity of wildlife species including turtles, fish and invertebrates. Developed 23.41 Utility Corridor 6.33 FACTS AT A GLANCE Natural Communities Acres Alluvial Forest 30.45 Protects six known springs and 1.5 miles of the Santa Fe Bottomland Forset 37.07 River Basin Swamp 0.20 Visitors can enjoy camping, paddling, swimming, and hiking. Floodplain Swamp 24.19 Limestone Outcrop 0.07 Became Florida’s official 175th state park October of 2017 Sandhill 177.37 Successional Hardwood Forest 40.30 The park’s 69,141 annual visitors contributed over $5 mil- Sinkhole 1.23 lion in direct economic impact. Sinkhole Lake 0.16 Located in Gilchrist County Upland Hardwood Forest 26.02 Abandoned Field/Pasture 31.57 Acreage: 402.42 acres Burrow Area 0.07 Developed 23.41 Lease/Management Agreement Number(s): 4814 Utility Corridor 6.33 Use: Single Use Designated Land Use: Public outdoor recreation and con- servation is the designated single use of the property. Agency: Department of Environmental Protection Divison of Recreation and Parks Responsbility: Public Outdoor Recreation and Conserva- tion Sublease: None Encumbrances: See Appendix 1 for details Type of Acquisition(s): Fee-simple, warranty deed with ac- quisition funded through the Florida Forever program, see Appendix 1 for details.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Springs Plant List
    Green Springs Park Volusia County, Deltona, Florida Common Name Scientific Names Notes Air-Potato Dioscorea bulbifora Non Native American Nightshade Solanum Americanism Arrowhead Vine Syngonium podophyllum Non Native Bartram's Airplant Tillandsia bartramii Basketgrass Oplismenus setarius Bear's Foot or Hairy Leafcup Smallanthus uvedalia Beautyberry Callicarpa americana Blackberry or Southern Dewberry Rubus trivialis Bladderpod Sesbania vesicaria Brazilian Pepper Schinus terebinthefolia Non Native Caesarweed Urena lobata Non Native Camphor Tree Connamonum camphora Non Native Carolina Jessamine Gelsemium sempervirens Carolina Laurelcherry Prunus caroliniana Christmas Lichen Cryptothecia rubrocincta Climbing Hemp Vine Micania cordifolia Cooley's Waterwillow Justicia Pringlei Endangered Coontie or Florida Arrowroot Zamia integrifolia Coral Ardesia Ardesia crenata Non Native Coralbean or Cherokee bean Erythrina herbacea Creeping Cucumber Melothria pendula Cuban Jute Sida rhombifolia Cudweed Gamochaeta spp. Devil's Ivy or Golden Pothos Epipremnum aureum Non Native Devil's Walking Stick Aralia spinosa Dog Fennel Eupatorium capillifolium Elephant Ear Colocasia spp Non Native Elephant Foot Elephantopus elatus Fern, Bracken Pteridium aquillinum Fern, Giant Leather Achrostichum danaefolium Fern, Giant Vine Stenochlaena tenuifolia Non Native Fern, Golden Polypody Phlebodium aurerum Fern, Netted Chain Woodwardia aerolata Fern, Resurrection Pleopeltis polypodiodes Fern, Tuberous Sword Nephrolepis cordifilia Non Native Fern, Woods Dryoteris spp Florida
    [Show full text]
  • K.Wilkmadidireport2006 Po Poprawkach PJ
    Lichens and lichenicolous fungi in the Madidi region (NW Bolivia) Los líquenes y hongos liquenícolas de la regíon de Madidi (NW Bolivia) Report from a field study MSc Karina Wilk, Laboratory of Lichenology, W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lubicz 46, PL-31-512 Krakow, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] The lichenological study was conducted during two expeditions to the Madidi region between May 13 and June 14 2006. The main purposes of the study were: 1) initiating a long- term inventory and research of lichens and lichenicolous fungi in the Madidi region, 2) a detailed study of species diversity, and 3) an ecological and phyto-geographical analysis of the studied lichen biota. The survey was conducted in the cooperation with Peter Jørgensen from Missouri Botanical Garden, U.S. – the director of the project “Inventario Botánico de la región de Madidi, Bolivia”. The expeditions to the Madidi region were organized by the staff from Herbario Nacional de Bolivia, La Paz. The first trip was organized by Alfredo Fuentes to the area of Camata, Charazani and Chulina villages (dept. La Paz, province Muñecas) and the second by Alejandro Araujo-Murakami and Leslie Cayola to the area of Azariamas – San Martin within the Madidi National Park (dept. La Paz, province Franz Tamayo). The lichens were collected from the mountainous area of the Madidi region, in the following ecosystems: 1) primary and secondary montane forests, altitude between 2550–3300 m, 2) seasonal montane forest, alt. between 1200–1600 m, and 3) dry forest of the Tuichi river basin, alt.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Lichens of the Natural Area Teaching Laboratory Barry Kaminsky Graduate Student, Department of Biology
    Common lichens of the Natural Area Teaching Laboratory Barry Kaminsky Graduate Student, Department of Biology Below is a non-technical key to the common lichens at the Natural Area Teaching Laboratory (NATL) located on the University of Florida campus. All habitats at NTL including the upland Pinus, xeric hardwood forest, and the seasonally flooded forest located near Archer Road were all surveyed. This key includes the most common species, however additional species (and potentially very similar looking species) may be present, especially in the genera Dirinaria, Parmotrema, and Physcia. A few specimens require a UV light or a “K” test, which is a 10% KOH solution. For the test, simply place a small, small drop (could use a toothpick) on the specified layer of the layer. Note different layers of the lichen could contain different chemicals so be sure to apply KOH on only the specified layer. As a courtesy, if you are collecting lichens or any biological specimens for class or research be sure to collect off the trail! 1a) Lichen is crustose (tightly adhered to the bark) and lacking distinct lobes ….. Key 1 1b) Lichen is fruticose (either pendant or erect, not leafy), or in one genus a central erect structure with numerous squamules…. Key 2 1c) Lichen is foliose (leafy or having lobes)…… Key 3 Key 1: Crustose Lichens 1a) Upper cortex is white and smooth with distinct bright red patches, isidia-like structures are bright red… Herpothallon rubrocinctum (syn: Cryptothecia rubrocincta) 1b) Upper cortex lacking reddish color… 2 2a) Lichen is yellowish green or yellow, consisting of granular sorediate masses… 3 2b) Lichen not as above… 4 3a) Lichen is bright yellow and consists of granular sorediate masses, usually on Pinus… Chrysothrix sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the California Lichen Society Is Edited by Isabelle Tavares, Shirley Tucker and Darrell Wright and Is Produced by Darrell Wright
    Bulletin of the California Lichen Society Volume 3 No. 2 Winter 1996 The California Lichen Society seeks to promote the appreciation, conservation, and study of the lichens. The focus of the Society is on California, but its interests include the entire western part of the continent. Dues are $15 per year payable to The California Lichen Society, 1200 Brickyard Way, #302, Point Richmond, CA 94801 . Members receive the Bulletin and notices of meetings, field trips, and workshops. The Bulletin of the California Lichen Society is edited by Isabelle Tavares, Shirley Tucker and Darrell Wright and is produced by Darrell Wright. Richard Doell produced the cover of this issue. The Bulletin welcomes manuscripts on technical topics in lichenology relating to western North America and on conservation of the lichens, as well as news of lichenologists and their activities. The best way to submit manuscripts apart from short articles and announcements is by E-mail or on 1.44 Mb diskette in Word Perfect 4.1 , 4.2 or 5.1 format; ASCII format is an alternative. Manuscripts should be double-spaced. Figures are the usual line drawings and sharp black and white glossy photos, unmounted, and must be sent by surface mail. A review process is followed. Nomenclature follows Esslinger and Egan's Sixth Checklist (The Bryologist 98: 467-549, 1995). The editors may substitute abbreviations of author's names, as appropriate, from R.K. Brummitt and C.E. Powell, Authors of Plant Names, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 1992. Style follows this issue. Reprints will be provided for a nominal charge.
    [Show full text]