DOCSLIB.ORG

Goals and Challenges Facing US Deployment in Manbij Artical Subject : Goals and Challenges Facing US Deployment in Manbij Publish Date: 21/03/2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Goals and Challenges Facing US Deployment in Manbij Artical Subject : Goals and Challenges Facing US Deployment in Manbij Publish Date: 21/03/2017 Artical Name : Goals and Challenges Facing US Deployment in Manbij Artical Subject : Goals and Challenges Facing US Deployment in Manbij Publish Date: 21/03/2017 Auther Name: Future for Advanced Research and Studies Subject : 10/7/2021 2:18:24 PM 1 / 2 The United States recently deployed 400 additional troops, including a team of army rangers and marine artillery, to the vicinity of the geopolitically important Syrian city of Manbij. The deployment occurred within the context of a new Pentagon plan, which, according to reports, was recently delivered to US President, Donald Trump. The plan¶s objective is to ramp up the fight against ISIS, and appears to have been met with approval.It is assumed that this recent deployment is an opening phase of the plan, which will face numerous challenges due to the highly complicated nature of the conflicts raging within Syria. It is assumed that this recent deployment manifests the execution of the new plan, which will face numerous challenges due to the complexity of the Syrian conflict. One challenge the deployed forces will face is the need to achieve multiple objectives, despite their limited numbers. In addition, the deployment serves as a test, whose results will either prove positive, leading to the increase in the number of deployed troops, or will lead to a search for other alternatives should it prove counterproductive.It can be stated that the main purpose of the US deployment is to force Washington¶s clashing allies to direct their attention on a common foe, ISIS. Yet, this approach carries many challenges as well.A Tangled MapAccording to a statement by General Joseph Votel, head of US Central Command, during a Senate hearing, the purpose of deployment in Manbij was to prevent confrontations between the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), including the Kurdish YPG group, and Turkish forces. This is consistent with statements made by Pentagon Spokesman Captain Jeff Davis that the aim of the deployment is to be a ³visible sign of deterrence and reassurance.´Such statements indicate that the relation between the SDF and the US is still an issue of contention between Ankara and Washington. Ankara takes an aggressive stance against the SDF and considers it a terrorist organization, as Turkey views its arm the People¶s Protection Unit (YPG) as an extension of the Kurdish Workers¶Party (PKK). Washington on the other hand perceives the SDF as a major partner in the fight against ISIS. There are also indications that the United States even considers the SDF to be the perfect model for the establishment of a multi-ethnic armed force in Syria. Washington might see that alienating either ally may hinder the operations to liberate Raqqa, in light of the difficulty in finding an alternative due to time constraints, coinciding with continued success of the Battle of Mosul in Iraq. This would mean that any delays would enable ISIS to reorganize itself in Raqqa.The feasibility of preventing a confrontation between allies can be put to the test, given the spread of different armed factions stationed in Manbij. Such a map would make evident that most of the warring and allied factions are positioned within a close proximity of one another. American forces are positioned in the area of Rmelan, and separate the Kurdish and Turkish forces. The Turks are committing around 350 troops as part of operation Euphrates Shield, which Turkey claims will back the Free Syrian Army in the north and west of Manbij. On the other hand, Syrian government forces are positioned in the western zone of Manbij, being supported by Russian air force and Iranian- backed militias. They are specifically concentrated in the area of al-Khafsah, 35 km south of Manbij, which is a strategically significant region due to the presence of the main water source for Aleppo.In light of this, it seems difficult for US forces with their limited numbers to carry out such a mission, unless the United States puts pressure on its allies to commit to a joint mission against ISIS. In addition, the US must set a vision of how to manage these territories in a collaborative manner with Russia.Other ObjectivesThere are several objectives Washington may seek to attain through its current plan, and can be summarized as follows:1. Strengthening US presence in Syria: Despite Washington¶s early intervention in the Syrian conflict, and its leadership of a coalition of over 60 countries in the war against ISIS, it has continued to play a secondary role given the evident Russian military presence in Syria. Though the total number of US military personnel currently deployed in Syria is disputed to be between 500 and 1000, it is still a small number. It is important to note that Washington had no significant battle deployment in Syria before this point, which indicates that it seeks to bolster its presence in Syria in the near future. 2. Expanding the range of available options: This is especially pertinent given rising American doubts with regards the possibility of increased coordination with Russia in the Syrian conflict. In a previous visit to NATO command in Brussels in mid-February 2017, US Secretary of Defense James Mattis also stated that Russia would have to ³prove itself first´meaning that any possible cooperation between Washington and Moscow in Syria will face serious obstacles, which cannot be taken lightly. 3. Preparation for the battle to re-capture Raqqa: Though American commanders assured that US force in Syria would not engage in the front lines, it will nevertheless be in close proximity to them. This means that, in fact, the US presence will function as a land-based military force for coordination and leadership in the upcoming battle for Raqqa, especially given the reliance on the SDF as a main US-backed participant in the battle. Yet this will be very difficult to achieve if Syrian government forces, or other such groups, participate in the battle.Different ChallengesGeneral Joseph Votel has also confirmed that the mission of the US force is difficult and arduous, and that it requires hard work both militarily, and diplomatically. This means that US troops have to successfully deter any fighting between their allies. Furthermore, although the US forces are well-armed, there are indicators that they are unlikely to be protected by the Turkish forces. This is a weak spot in the chain, especially given that Ankara, which has recently increased coordination with Moscow, is critical of Washington¶s plan for the coming battle in Raqqa. The Turks have also announced that they will fight the Kurdish forces in Manbij. 7XUNLVK3ULPH0LQLVWHU%LQDOL<ÕOGÕUÕPVWDWHGWKDW:DVKLQJWRQ¶s plans and the Kurdish presence might constrict Turkey¶s desire to establish a safe-zone, and that such a safe-zone is a current point of agreement between Turkey and the Trump administration. If the disputes between both parties escalate, the US forces may find themselves facing increasing danger, and consequently the increasing likelihood of mission failure. It doesn¶t seem likely that the SDF will carry out violent attacks against Turkish forces inside Syria. The SDF are adamant that they should have a major role in the battle for Raqqa, and believe that the liberation of many villages in Raqqa¶s vicinity is an achievement that they should be credited with. Their aim is to subject these villages to a regime of joint administration between the Kurds and the Arabs. Without a doubt, these challenges reduce the likelihood of success for the proposed American plan, especially given that the challenges exist simultaneously with American doubts over the Russian position with regards to the latest developments in the conflict. Field tactics reveal that Washington prioritizes military mobilization over joint agreements and arrangements with allies and the various forces in Syria. Thus, it can be expected that testing US tactics will have a strong negative effect on Washington¶s policies, if Washington doesn¶t work on adopting a comprehensive multi-dimensional strategy including issues such as Washington¶s position on safe-zones, in addition to agreements on the future of the liberated zones, especially next to the Turkish-Syrian contact line. 10/7/2021 2:18:24 PM 2 / 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Offensive Against the Syrian City of Manbij May Be the Beginning of a Campaign to Liberate the Area Near the Syrian-Turkish Border from ISIS
    June 23, 2016 Offensive against the Syrian City of Manbij May Be the Beginning of a Campaign to Liberate the Area near the Syrian-Turkish Border from ISIS Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) fighters at the western entrance to the city of Manbij (Fars, June 18, 2016). Overview 1. On May 31, 2016, the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), a Kurdish-dominated military alliance supported by the United States, initiated a campaign to liberate the northern Syrian city of Manbij from ISIS. Manbij lies west of the Euphrates, about 35 kilometers (about 22 miles) south of the Syrian-Turkish border. In the three weeks since the offensive began, the SDF forces, which number several thousand, captured the rural regions around Manbij, encircled the city and invaded it. According to reports, on June 19, 2016, an SDF force entered Manbij and occupied one of the key squares at the western entrance to the city. 2. The declared objective of the ground offensive is to occupy Manbij. However, the objective of the entire campaign may be to liberate the cities of Manbij, Jarabulus, Al-Bab and Al-Rai, which lie to the west of the Euphrates and are ISIS strongholds near the Turkish border. For ISIS, the loss of the area is liable to be a severe blow to its logistic links between the outside world and the centers of its control in eastern Syria (Al-Raqqah), Iraq (Mosul). Moreover, the loss of the region will further 112-16 112-16 2 2 weaken ISIS's standing in northern Syria and strengthen the military-political position and image of the Kurdish forces leading the anti-ISIS ground offensive.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biden Administration and the Middle East: Policy Recommendations for a Sustainable Way Forward
    THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION AND THE MIDDLE EAST: POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR A SUSTAINABLE WAY FORWARD THE MIDDLE EAST INSTITUTE MARCH 2021 WWW.MEI.EDU 2 The Biden Administration and the Middle East: Policy Recommendations for a Sustainable Way Forward The Middle East Institute March 2021 3 CONTENTS FOREWORD Iraq 21 Strategic Considerations for Middle East Policy 6 Randa Slim, Senior Fellow and Director of Conflict Paul Salem, President Resolution and Track II Dialogues Program Gerald Feierstein, Senior Vice President Ross Harrison, Senior Fellow and Director of Research Israel 23 Eran Etzion, Non-Resident Scholar POLICY BRIEFS Jordan 26 Dima Toukan, Non-Resident Scholar Countries/Regions Paul Salem, President US General Middle East Interests & Policy Priorities 12 Paul Salem, President Lebanon 28 Christophe Abi-Nassif, Director of Lebanon Program Afghanistan 14 Marvin G. Weinbaum, Director of Afghanistan and Libya 30 Pakistan Program Jonathan M. Winer, Non-Resident Scholar Algeria 15 Morocco 32 Robert Ford, Senior Fellow William Lawrence, Contributor Egypt 16 Pakistan 34 Mirette F. Mabrouk, Senior Fellow and Director of Marvin G. Weinbaum, Director of Afghanistan and Egypt Program Pakistan Program Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) 18 Palestine & the Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process 35 Gerald Feierstein, Senior Vice President Nathan Stock, Non-Resident Scholar Khaled Elgindy, Senior Fellow and Director of Program Horn of Africa & Red Sea Basin 19 on Palestine and Palestinian-Israeli Affairs David Shinn, Non-Resident Scholar Saudi Arabia 37 Iran
    [Show full text]
  • The Kurdish Question in the Middle East
    Strategic Sectors | Security & Politics The Kurdish Question in the Middle Panorama East: Regional Dynamics and Return to National Control Olivier Grojean its influence in Iran (via the PJAK), in Syria (via the Lecturer in Political Science PYD and its SDF, which now control numerous The European Centre for Sociology and Political Kurdish and Arab territories) and even in Iraq, near Science (CESSP), University of Paris I-Panthéon- Mont Qandil where it is based, but also in the Sorbonne and National Center for Scientific Research Maxmûr Kurdish refugee camp in Turkey and the (CNRS), Paris Yazidi regions of Sinjar. In sum, the past few dec- Strategic Sectors | Security & Politics ades have seen a rise in power of Kurdish political parties, which have managed to profoundly region- The past four decades have seen an increasing re- alize the Kurdish question by allying themselves with gionalization of the Kurdish question on the Middle regional or global powers. At once both the life- East scale. The Iranian Revolution and the Iran-Iraq blood and consequence of this regionalization, the War (1980-1988), the 1991 Gulf War and its con- rivalry between the conservative, liberal pole em- sequences throughout the 1990s, US intervention bodied by Barzani’s PDK and the post-Marxist revo- in Iraq in 2003, the Syrian revolution and its repres- lutionary pole embodied by the PKK has led to sion as of 2011 and finally, the increasing power of greater interconnection of Kurdish issues in differ- 265 the Islamic State as of 2014 have been important ent countries. vectors for the expansion of Kurdish issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Us Priorities in the Middle East
    US PRIORITIES IN THE MIDDLE EAST GENERAL (RET.) JOSEPH VOTEL DECEMBER 2019 POLICY PAPER 2019-23 CONTENTS * SUMMARY III * INTRODUCTION 1 * US INTERESTS 1 * STRATEGIC APPROACH 4 * AFGHANISTAN, SYRIA, IRAQ, LEBANON, 5 THE GULF & IRAN * CONCLUSION 8 SUMMARY Today the Middle East is as complex as it has ever been. All of the underlying issues that have undermined progress remain present: sectarianism, corruption, disenfranchisement, economic disparity, terrorism, and extraordinary human suffering. But these long-standing issues are now being exacerbated by super-modern communication capabilities and a more youthful and anxious population that serve to amplify the challenges of the region. The region is on edge — and it is in fact a tinder box with few clear paths to stability or de-escalation. The best way forward is to relentlessly pursue clarity in our interests and objectives. This is the best thing we can do to de-escalate tensions, pursue our interests in the region, and support our overall global national security strategy. Cover photo: US military vehicles, part of a joint convoy with the Kurdish People’s Protection Units (YPG), patrol near the town of Al-Muabbadah in Hasakeh Province in northeastern Syria on the border with Turkey, on Nov. 9, 2019. (Photo by DELIL SOULEIMAN/AFP via Getty Images) Above photo: A US military Chinook helicopter lands on a field outside the governor’s palace during a visit by the commander of US and NATO forces in Afghanistan, General Scott Mill- er, and Asadullah Khalid, acting minister of defense of Afghanistan, in Maidan Shar, capital of Wardak Province.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Publication
    Viewpoints No. 99 Mission Impossible? Triangulating U.S.- Turkish Relations with Syria’s Kurds Amberin Zaman Public Policy Fellow, Woodrow Wilson Center; Columnist, Diken.com.tr and Al-Monitor Pulse of the Middle East April 2016 The United States is trying to address Turkish concerns over its alliance with a Syrian Kurdish militia against the Islamic State. Striking a balance between a key NATO ally and a non-state actor is growing more and more difficult. Middle East Program ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ On April 7 Syrian opposition rebels backed by airpower from the U.S.-led Coalition against the Islamic State (ISIS) declared that they had wrested Al Rai, a strategic hub on the Turkish border from the jihadists. They hailed their victory as the harbinger of a new era of rebel cooperation with the United States against ISIS in the 98-kilometer strip of territory bordering Turkey that remains under the jihadists’ control. Their euphoria proved short-lived: On April 11 it emerged that ISIS had regained control of Al Rai and the rest of the areas the rebels had conquered in the past week. Details of what happened remain sketchy because poor weather conditions marred visibility. But it was still enough for Coalition officials to describe the reversal as a “total collapse.” The Al Rai fiasco is more than just a battleground defeat against the jihadists. It’s a further example of how Turkey’s conflicting goals with Washington are hampering the campaign against ISIS. For more than 18 months the Coalition has been striving to uproot ISIS from the 98- kilometer chunk of the Syrian-Turkish border that is generically referred to the “Manbij Pocket” or the Marea-Jarabulus line.
    [Show full text]
  • The Syrian Civil War a New Stage, but Is It the Final One?
    THE SYRIAN CIVIL WAR A NEW STAGE, BUT IS IT THE FINAL ONE? ROBERT S. FORD APRIL 2019 POLICY PAPER 2019-8 CONTENTS * SUMMARY * 1 INTRODUCTION * 3 BEGINNING OF THE CONFLICT, 2011-14 * 4 DYNAMICS OF THE WAR, 2015-18 * 11 FAILED NEGOTIATIONS * 14 BRINGING THE CONFLICT TO A CLOSE * 18 CONCLUSION © The Middle East Institute The Middle East Institute 1319 18th Street NW Washington, D.C. 20036 SUMMARY Eight years on, the Syrian civil war is finally winding down. The government of Bashar al-Assad has largely won, but the cost has been steep. The economy is shattered, there are more than 5 million Syrian refugees abroad, and the government lacks the resources to rebuild. Any chance that the Syrian opposition could compel the regime to negotiate a national unity government that limited or ended Assad’s role collapsed with the entry of the Russian military in mid- 2015 and the Obama administration’s decision not to counter-escalate. The country remains divided into three zones, each in the hands of a different group and supported by foreign forces. The first, under government control with backing from Iran and Russia, encompasses much of the country, and all of its major cities. The second, in the east, is in the hands of a Kurdish-Arab force backed by the U.S. The third, in the northwest, is under Turkish control, with a mix of opposition forces dominated by Islamic extremists. The Syrian government will not accept partition and is ultimately likely to reassert its control in the eastern and northwestern zones.
    [Show full text]
  • State-Led Urban Development in Syria and the Prospects for Effective Post-Conflict Reconstruction
    5 State-led urban development in Syria and the prospects for effective post-conflict reconstruction NADINE ALMANASFI As the militarized phase of the Syrian Uprising and Civil War winds down, questions surrounding how destroyed cities and towns will be rebuilt, with what funding and by whom pervade the political discourse on Syria. There have been concerns that if the international community engages with reconstruction ef- forts they are legitimizing the regime and its war crimes, leaving the regime in a position to control and benefit from reconstruc- tion. Acting Assistant Secretary of State of the United States, Ambassador David Satterfield stated that until a political process is in place that ensures the Syrian people are able to choose a leadership ‘without Assad at its helm’, then the United States will not be funding reconstruction projects.1 The Ambassador of France to the United Nations also stated that France will not be taking part in any reconstruction process ‘unless a political transition is effectively carried out’ and this is also the position of the European Union.1 Bashar al-Assad him- self has outrightly claimed that the West will have no part to play 1 Beals, E (2018). Assad’s Reconstruction Agenda Isn’t Waiting for Peace. Neither Should Ours. Available: https://tcf.org/content/report/assads-recon- struction-agenda-isnt-waiting-peace-neither/?agreed=1. 1 Irish, J & Bayoumy, Y. (2017). Anti-Assad nations say no to Syria recon- struction until political process on track. Available: https://uk.reu- ters.com/article/uk-un-assembly-syria/anti-assad-nations-say-no-to-syria- reconstruction-until-political-process-on-track-idUKKCN1BU04J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Turkish War on Afrin Jeopardizes Progress Made Since the Liberation of Raqqa April 2018
    Viewpoints No. 125 The Turkish War on Afrin Jeopardizes Progress Made Since the Liberation of Raqqa April 2018 Amy Austin Holmes Middle East Fellow Wilson Center Turkey’s assault on Afrin represents a three-fold threat to the civilian population, the model of local self-governance, and the campaign to defeat the Islamic State. None of this is in the interest of the United States. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ The Turkish operation in Afrin is not just another battle in a small corner of Syria, but represents a new stage in the Syrian civil war and anti-ISIS campaign. President Erdoğan’s two-month battle to capture Afrin signals that Turkey will no longer act through proxies, but is willing to intervene directly on Syrian territory to crush the Kurdish YPG forces and the experiment in self-rule they are defending.i Emboldened after claiming victory in Afrin, and enabled by Russia, Erdoğan is threatening further incursions into Syria and Iraq. Erdoğan has demanded that American troops withdraw from Manbij, so that he can attack the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) who are stationed in the area, and who have been our most reliable partners in the anti-ISIS coalition. If Erdoğan is not deterred, much of the progress made since the liberation of Raqqa could be in jeopardy. The Afrin intervention has already displaced at least 150,000 people. Many of them are Kurds, Yezidis, or Christians who established local government councils in the absence of the regime over the past five years. Even if imperfect, the self-administration is an embryonic form of democracy that includes women and minorities while promoting religious tolerance and linguistic diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • WEEKLY CONFLICT SUMMARY | 31 May - 6 June 2021
    WEEKLY CONFLICT SUMMARY | 31 May - 6 June 2021 SYRIA SUMMARY • The predominantly Kurdish Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) cracks down on anti-conscription protests in Manbij, Aleppo Governorate. • The Government of Syria (GoS) offers to defer military service for people wanted in southern Syria. • ISIS assassinates a prominent religious leader in Deir-ez-Zor city. Figure 1: Dominant actors’ area of control and influence in Syria as of 6 June 2021. NSOAG stands for Non-state Organized Armed Groups. Also, please see footnote 1. Page 1 of 5 WEEKLY CONFLICT SUMMARY | 31 May - 6 June 2021 NORTHWEST SYRIA1 Figure 2: Anti-conscription protests and related events in Manbij, Aleppo Governorate between 31 May – 6 June. Data from The Carter Center and ACLED. Conscription in Northwest Syria In 2019, the Kurdish Autonomous Administration (KAA) issued a controversial conscription law for territories under its control.2 in February, the Syrian Network For Human Rights claimed that the conscription of teachers deprived half a million students of a proper education. 3 People in the region argue that the forcible recruitment and arrests by SDF have disrupted economic life.4 In late May, the SDF escalated its recruitment effort.5 31 May 1 Figure 1 depicts areas of the dominant actors’ control and influence. While “control” is a relative term in a complex, dynamic conflict, territorial control is defined as an entity having power over use of force as well as civil/administrative functions in an area. Russia, Iran, and Hezbollah maintain a presence in Syrian government-controlled territory. Non-state organized armed groups (NSOAG), including the Kurdish-dominated SDF and Turkish-backed opposition groups operate in areas not under GoS control.
    [Show full text]
  • Lead Inspector General for Operation Freedom's Sentinel April 1, 2021
    OFS REPORT TO CONGRESS FRONT MATTER OPERATION FREEDOM’S SENTINEL LEAD INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT TO THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS APRIL 1, 2021–JUNE 30, 2021 FRONT MATTER ABOUT THIS REPORT A 2013 amendment to the Inspector General Act established the Lead Inspector General (Lead IG) framework for oversight of overseas contingency operations and requires that the Lead IG submit quarterly reports to Congress on each active operation. The Chair of the Council of Inspectors General for Integrity and Efficiency designated the DoD Inspector General (IG) as the Lead IG for Operation Freedom’s Sentinel (OFS). The DoS IG is the Associate IG for the operation. The USAID IG participates in oversight of the operation. The Offices of Inspector General (OIG) of the DoD, the DoS, and USAID are referred to in this report as the Lead IG agencies. Other partner agencies also contribute to oversight of OFS. The Lead IG agencies collectively carry out the Lead IG statutory responsibilities to: • Develop a joint strategic plan to conduct comprehensive oversight of the operation. • Ensure independent and effective oversight of programs and operations of the U.S. Government in support of the operation through either joint or individual audits, inspections, investigations, and evaluations. • Report quarterly to Congress and the public on the operation and activities of the Lead IG agencies. METHODOLOGY To produce this quarterly report, the Lead IG agencies submit requests for information to the DoD, the DoS, USAID, and other Federal agencies about OFS and related programs. The Lead IG agencies also gather data and information from other sources, including official documents, congressional testimony, policy research organizations, press conferences, think tanks, and media reports.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2017 Campaigning
    Campaigning The Journal of the Joint Forces Staff College Featured Essays Globally Integrated Countering Threat Operations: Transforming Networks: A Standard Lines the JTF Core of Effort Model U.S. Needs to “Get Smart” Transregional Capstone vs Russia Exercise Trains for Tomorrow’s Fight “That All May Labor As One” Fall 2017 Campaigning Fall 2017 https://jdeis.js.mil/jdeis/index.jsp?pindex=69 http://jfsc.ndu.edu/ Commandant RDML Jeffrey Ruth, USN Dean of Faculty and Academic Programs Dr. Amie Lonas Director, Joint Advanced Director, Joint and Combined Warfighting School Warfighting School CAPT Miguel Peko, USN CAPT Paul Crump, USN Director, Joint Command, Director, Joint Continuing Control and Information and Distance Education Operations School School COL Rolf Watts, USA COL Ernest Parker, USA Editor Dr. Daniel H. McCauley Editorial Board: Assistant Professor William S. Marlowe Dr. Kenneth P. Pisel Dr. Frederick R. Kienle Cover image: JCWS Seminar 14 Students 17-04, 2017. Photo by Daniel McCauley. Campaigning Fall 2017 i In this issue of Campaigning: Editor’s Corner…………………………………………………………………………….iii Dr. Daniel H. McCauley Features Globally Integrated Operations: Transforming the JTF Core…………...………………1 Col Camille Nichols, COL Robert Paddock, LTC (P) Jasper Jeffers, and Lt Col Sean Monteiro Countering Threat Networks: A Standard Lines of Effort Model……………………...13 Col Chris Goodyear, COL Brian Greata, LTC Timothy Payment, and Col Martin Wetterauer U.S. Needs to “Get Smart” vs Russia.……………………………….……………………27 CDR David P. Wolynski, LTC John R. Cuva, Maj Ryan A. Reynolds, and MAJ Anthony P. Newman Transregional Capstone Exercise Trains for Tomorrow’s Fight…….…………………37 LCDR William Buell, Maj Erin Dorrance, and MAJ Bob West Commentary Developing an Operational Approach for the Transition from War to Peace through Stabilization, Reconstruction, and Development: Understanding Critical Aspects of the Environment…………………………..……….46 Associate Professor Tom Snukis Polarity Management in International Relations….……………………………………50 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Sdf's Arab Majority Rank Turkey As the Biggest
    SDF’S ARAB MAJORITY RANK TURKEY AS THE BIGGEST THREAT TO NE SYRIA. Survey Data on America’s Partner Forces Amy Austin Holmes 2 0 1 9 Arab women from Deir Ezzor who joined the SDF after living under the Islamic State Of all the actors in the Syrian conflict, the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) are perhaps the most misunderstood party. Five years after the United States decided to partner with the SDF, gaping holes remain in our knowledge about the women and men who defeated the Islamic State (IS). In order to remedy the knowledge gap, I conducted the first field survey of the Syrian Democratic Forces. Through multiple visits to all of the governorates of Northeastern Syria under SDF control, I have generated new and unprecedented data, which can offer policy guidance as the United States must make decisions about how to move forward in the post-caliphate era. There are a number of reasons for the current lack of substantive information on the SDF. First, the SDF has been in a state of constant expansion ever since it was created, pro- gressively recruiting more people and capturing more territory. And, as a non-state actor, the SDF lacks the bureaucracy of national armies. Defeating the Islamic State was their priority, not collecting statistics. The SDF’s low media profile has also played a role. Perhaps wary of their status as militia leaders, high-ranking commanders have been reticent to give interviews. Recently, Gen- eral Mazlum Kobani, the Kurdish commander-in-chief of the SDF, has conducted a few interviews.1 And even less is known about the group’s rank-and-file troops.
    [Show full text]