DOCSLIB.ORG

Feeding Ecology of Invasive Catfishes in Chesapeake Bay Subestuaries Joseph D

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Feeding Ecology of Invasive Catfishes in Chesapeake Bay Subestuaries Joseph D Feeding Ecology of Invasive Catfishes in Chesapeake Bay Subestuaries Joseph D. Schmitt Dissertation submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of: Doctor of Philosophy in Fish and Wildlife Conservation Donald J. Orth Yan Jiao Leandro Castello Brandon K. Peoples Defended on March 23, 2018 Blacksburg, VA Keywords: invasion ecology, food habits, diet, blue catfish, flathead catfish, consumption rates, daily ration, prey selectivity, diet breadth, trophic position, omnivory index Feeding Ecology of Invasive Catfishes in Chesapeake Bay Subestuaries Joseph D. Schmitt Academic Abstract Blue Catfish Ictalurus furcatus are native to tributaries of the Mississippi River but are now invasive in several Atlantic slope drainages. This includes subestuaries of the Chesapeake Bay, where their feeding ecology and potential impact on native species was largely unknown. We collected stomach contents from 16,110 Blue Catfish at 698 sites in three large subestuaries of the Chesapeake Bay (James, York, Rappahannock rivers). Cumulative prey curves revealed that sample size was sufficient for diet description, though 1,000 – 1500 stomachs were needed per river. Blue Catfish are opportunistic generalists that feed on a broad array of plant and animal material. Logistic regression models reveal that Blue Catfish undergo significant ontogenetic diet shifts to piscivory at larger sizes (P<0.01) though the lengths at which these shifts occur varies by river system (500 – 900 mm total length; TL). Over 60% of Blue Catfish stomachs contained other invasive species, primarily Hydrilla verticillata and Asian clams Corbicula fluminea. Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) revealed that salinity and season explained the most variation in Blue Catfish diet, while Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) demonstrated that there is considerable spatiotemporal and length-based variation in predation of species of concern. Species of concern include American Shad, American Eel, and river herring, which are imperiled, and blue crab, which support valuable fisheries in Chesapeake Bay. Predation of American Shad, American Eel, and river herring was rare (max predicted occurrence in Blue Catfish diets = 8%), while blue crab was much more common in the diet (max predicted occurrence =28%). Predation of American Shad and river herring peaks in freshwater areas in April, while predation of blue crab peaks in brackish areas in October. Predation of all species of concern is highest for large catfish (500 – 1000 mm TL). Field and laboratory-based estimates of consumption rate revealed that Blue Catfish feed at similar rates as Channel Catfish Ictalurus punctatus, and daily ration is estimated to be 2-5% bodyweight per day during warm temperatures, while peak feeding (maximum daily ration) can approach 10% bodyweight per day. While consumption of imperiled species is rare, Blue Catfish could still have negative impacts on these species due to dense catfish populations. Feeding Ecology of Invasive Catfishes in Chesapeake Bay Subestuaries Joseph D. Schmitt General Audience Abstract Native to the Mississippi River basin, Blue Catfish Ictalurus furcatus are the largest catfish species in North America; they can exceed 100 lbs and live for over 30 years. They were stocked in Chesapeake Bay as a sportfish 40 years ago and are now considered invasive. We performed a series of experiments to describe how invasive Blue Catfish fit in the food web, including diet and consumption rate analyses. Most of the Blue Catfish population is comprised of opportunistic generalists that feed on a diverse array of plant and animal material. We experimentally demonstrated that Blue Catfish tend to feed on whatever species are locally abundant. The most common prey were other species considered invasive in Chesapeake Bay; primarily Asian clams and Hydrilla verticillata, which is an invasive aquatic plant. Blue Catfish also eat other types of vegetation, clams, snails, crabs, fish, small invertebrates, mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians. Consumption of imperiled native fishes (like American Shad, American Eel, and river herring) was uncommon while consumption of the commercially-valuable blue crab was common, especially in brackish areas during the autumn. Blue Catfish consumption rates were similar to a closely related species, the channel catfish, and blue catfish can consume an estimated 2 – 5% of their body weight per day during the summer months, and up to 10% of their body weight per day during times of peak feeding. While consumption of imperiled species is rare, Blue Catfish could still have negative impacts on these species due to dense catfish populations Acknowledgements This project would not have been possible without the assistance and support of many different individuals. First and foremost, I would like to thank my wife, Suzie Schmitt, who suffered through 3+ years of me making the four-hour trip from Blacksburg to eastern Virginia. I was often gone for multiple nights in row, and would return exhausted, disorganized, and covered with catfish vomit. I was definitely not as helpful around the house as I should have been. I appreciate your patience throughout the process. Jason Emmel and Zach Moran were the pillar stones of this project. Their work ethic and “whatever it takes to get the job done” approach fueled our success and contributed to the tremendous amount of stomachs we were able to collect and process in a relatively short period of time. Whether we were rebuilding carburetors in our hotel parking, battling 60 mph squalls on the lower York River, or camping in snow storms at Chickahominy Riverfront Park, we always worked together to “improvise, adapt, and overcome”. Lifelong friendships were formed through the challenges we faced together, and many laughs were shared. Thanks for all your help. I also want to thank my advisor, Donald J. Orth, who provided incredible guidance and support throughout this entire project. Even when things went poorly, he always focused on solutions rather than dwelling on my failures. I realize how fortunate I was to have you as a graduate advisor. Many other individuals were instrumental in the completion of this project. Brandon Peoples, Aaron Bunch, Bob Greenlee, Kaylie Johnson, Hae Kim, Michael Moore, Hunter Hatcher, John Woodward, and Skylar Wolf helped tremendously in the field and in the lab. Brandon Peoples, Bob Greenlee, John Odenkirk, Leandro Castello, Eric Hallerman, Aaron Bunch, and Scott Smith provided guidance and assistance during project scoping, analysis, and writing. The Smithsonian Institution, particularly Rob Aguilar and Matt Ogburn, assisted with the use of advanced molecular techniques to identify digested piscine prey. Trophic position research was assisted by Esra Gokturk, while commercial fishermen B.T. Smith and Wayne Fisher kindly assisted with our field operations and provided invaluable local knowledge. Tom and Florie Spellerburg provided overnight lodging and delicious meals to our smelly catfish crew on many occasions. Aaron Bunch, Robbie Willis, Kirk Dunn, Kaylie Johnson, and Alan Weaver helped with the collection of stomachs during the spring Alosa migration. Zach Moran, Allison Mosley, Hae Kim, Haena Lee, and John Woodward spent hours of effort in the laboratory and sorted through thousands of bags of putrid stomach contents. Finally, I want to thank Virginia Sea Grant folks, Susan Park and Janet Kren, for their help in the field, and also Sam Lake, Sabine Rogers, and Ian Vorster for their guidance and support. This project was funded by the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries through a Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration Grant from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Additional student support was provided by a graduate student research fellowship from Virginia Sea Grant and the Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation. During the course of this project I celebrated the birth of my first child, Lily Ava Schmitt. I dedicate this work to her. iv Table of Contents Important Note to Readers ......................................................................................................................... vi Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Research Gaps .............................................................................................................. 10 1.2 Objectives and Products ............................................................................................... 11 1.3 Methods Overiew ......................................................................................................... 12 1.4 References .................................................................................................................... 14 Chapter 2: Predation and Prey Selectivity of Nonnative Catfish on Migrating Alosines in an Atlantic Slope Estuary 2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 20 2.2 Methods ....................................................................................................................... 24 2.3 Results .......................................................................................................................... 32 2.4 Discussion ....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7.841,126 B2 Huppert (45) Date of Patent: Nov.30, 2010
    USOO7841 126B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7.841,126 B2 Huppert (45) Date of Patent: Nov.30, 2010 (54) MODULAR SINKER 2004/0000385 A1 1/2004 Ratte ......................... 164f76.1 2009.0114162 A1* 5/2009 Locklear ..................... 119.256 (76) Inventor: Mikel Huppert, 1327 Debra St., Ellsworth, WI (US) 54011 FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS JP 11196738 A * 7, 1999 (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this JP 200O262197 A * 9, 2000 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 JP 2003125,685 A * 5, 2003 U.S.C. 154(b) by 39 days. JP 2004305108 A * 11, 2004 (21) Appl. No.: 12/082,061 OTHER PUBLICATIONS Machine translation of JP11 196738 A from http://www19.ipdl.inpit. (22) Filed: Apr. 8, 2008 go.jp/PA1/cgi-bin/PA1 INIT?1181685164439.* Machine translation of JP2000262197 A from http://www19.ipdl. (65) Prior Publication Data inpit.go.jp/PA1/cgi-bin/PA1 INIT?1 181685164439.* Machine translation of JP2003125685 A from http://www19.ipdl. US 2009/O249679 A1 Oct. 8, 2009 inpit.go.jp/PA1/cgi-bin/PA1 INIT?1 181685164439.* (51) Int. Cl. * cited by examiner AIK 95/00 (2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl. ..................................................... 43/43.14 Primary Examiner Son TNguyen (58) Field of Classification Search ................ 43/44.87, Assistant Examiner Shadi Baniani 43/42.06, 42.09, 42.31, 43.1, 44.96, 43.14; A0IK 95/00, (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm DLTschida AOIK 95/02 See application file for complete search history. (57) ABSTRACT (56) References Cited An improved slip sinker having a hollow non-buoyant tubular body mounted intermediate a flanged headpiece having a fish U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Populations, Behavior, and Seasonal Dispersal of Bald Eagles in Northwestern Illinois
    WINTER POPULATIONS, BEHAVIOR, AND SEASONAL DISPERSAL OF BALD EAGLES IN NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS WILLIAM E. SOUTHERN s a result of efforts by Bent (1937)) Broley (1952)) Herrick (1924, A 1932, and 1933), Imler (1955)) and others, numerous data on the Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus Zeucocephalus) are available. Little of the published information, however, pertains to the winter habits of the species or to winter population dynamics and seasonal movements. Between 27 November 1961 and 1 April 1962, at the Savanna Army Depot, Carroll and Jo Daviess counties, Illinois, my assistants and I spent 232 hours observing and attempting to trap eagles. Additional time was devoted to other aspects of the project (making and setting traps, securing bait, etc.). On several occasions we spent the entire daylight period in the area. The study area extended for 14 miles along the Mississippi River and its backwaters and sloughs, which were proliferated with islands (Fig. 1). Most of the slightly rolling terrain bordering the river was covered by deciduous forest. The trees along a portion of the main channel had been thinned to the point that the area (between points 1 and 2, Fig. 1) resembled a park. The study area represented only a small part of the habitat suitable for eagles near Savanna; however, it probably had the greatest abundance of food and, there- fore, eagles (we observed only four outside the Depot; three of these during spring dispersal). The concentrations reported during our study were larger than those reported elsewhere in the state. My objectives were to record behavior, live-trap, color-mark, and determine the movements of Bald Eagles during the winter and early spring.
    [Show full text]
  • Shad in the Schools, NC
    Attachment 1 Food Web Activity Student Sheet Background Information: Shad in the Schools, N.C. The coastal rivers and shallow marine environments along the coast of North Carolina are home to complex ecosystems. Within these freshwater and saltwater ecosystems there is an intimate relationship between many different producers and consumers. These produces and consumers create an interconnected food web. Each organism is dependent on clean water, oxygen, and healthy riparian corridors on the lands adjacent to these waters. The disruption of just one component of any food web can disturb all living things, including humans. American shad, a member of the herring family, is one species of fish that plays a critical role in the river and near shore shallow marine ecosystems of North Carolina. Shad are an anadromous species, meaning they live in the ocean but return to the rivers of North Carolina in the spring to spawn, or reproduce, each spring. This means that shad serve as a food source for many animals living in both inland freshwater and marine environments. Predators of shad include other fishes such as striped bass and king mackerel, bald eagles, bottlenose dolphin, and humans. Bald eagles have evolved to raise their young at the same time that anadromous fishes, such as shad, return to the rivers to spawn so that the young eaglets will have a plentiful food source. This evolutionary trait highlights the connectivity that can be found within food webs. Bald Eagles can be viewed now through a new technology, web cams. To see eagles that feed on herring near North Carolina, view http://www.friendsofblackwater.org/camhtm2.html.
    [Show full text]
  • Important Northeast Fish Provides Bait & Forage Needs
    Species Profile: Atlantic Herring Atlantic Herring Clupea harengus Important Northeast Fish Provides Bait & Forage Needs Introduction Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) is a member of the clupeid family, which are typically small, schooling marine fishes, such as menhaden, shad, and sardines. This species is also known as sea herring because it spends its entire life cycle in the ASMFC Management Area: ME - NJ ocean (unlike the anadromous river herring). Atlantic herring inhabits the coastal Common Names: Sea herring, sar- waters of the United States from Cape Hatteras, North Carolina through Labra- dine, herring dor, Canada, and also off the coasts of Europe. Herring form the base of the food web as a forage fish for marine mammals, seabirds, and many fish throughout the Interesting Facts: * Atlantic sea herring are often Mid-Atlantic and Northeast. They are an effective and affordable bait source for confused with river herring. Sea lobster, blue crab, and tuna fishermen, and were historically sold by fish canneries herring spend their entire life at as sardines. Whale watching/ecotourism and salt retailers are indirectly dependent sea, while river herring migrate on a steady supply of herring because whales migrate inshore in pursuit of schooling annually to freshwater to spawn. * Atlantic and Pacific herring have herring and fishermen buy salt to preserve their fish. Overseas, frozen and salted been found to produce a burst herring are a valued commodity. of sound, called a Fast Repetitive Tick, at night. Its believed that The Commission’s Atlantic Herring Section manages herring in state waters (0 - 3 this high-pitched click-like sound miles from shore), while the New England Fishery Management Council (Council) is used by herring to signal their location, thereby making it easier regulates the stock in federal waters (3 - 200 miles from shore).
    [Show full text]
  • Alewives and Blueback Herring Juila Beaty University of Maine
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Maine Sea Grant Publications Maine Sea Grant 2014 Fisheries Then: Alewives and Blueback Herring Juila Beaty University of Maine Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/seagrant_pub Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons Repository Citation Beaty, Juila, "Fisheries Then: Alewives and Blueback Herring" (2014). Maine Sea Grant Publications. 71. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/seagrant_pub/71 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine Sea Grant Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. (http://www.downeastfisheriestrail.org) Alewives and Blueback Herring Fisheries Then: Alewives and Blueback Herring (i.e. River Herring) By Julia Beaty and Natalie Springuel Reviewed by Chris Bartlett, Dan Kircheis The term “river herring” collectively refers to two species: Alosa pseudoharengus, commonly known as alewife, and the closely related Alosa aestivalis, commonly known as blueback herring, or simply bluebacks. Records dating back to the early nineteenth century indicate that fishermen could tell the difference between alewives and bluebacks, which look very similar; however, historically they have been harvested together with little regard to the differences between the two (Collette and Klein­MacPhee 2002). Alewives are the more common of the two species in most rivers in Maine (Collette and Klien­ MacPhee 2002). Fishermen in Maine often use the word “alewife” to refer to both alewives and bluebacks. Both alewives and bluebacks are anadromous fish, meaning that they are born in fresh water, but spend the majority of their adult lives at sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Herring
    Species Profile: Atlantic Herring New Stock Assessment Could Lead to Species Snapshot Management Changes Introduction Atlantic Herring Until recently, the Atlantic herring stock had been considered healthy and fully rebuilt from a Clupea harengus collapsed stock in the 1980s. However, the results of the 2018 benchmark stock assessment have raised new concerns about the Atlantic herring resource. While the stock remains not Management Unit: Maine through New Jersey overfished and was not experiencing overfishing in the terminal year (2017) of the assess- ment, the assessment did show very low levels of recruitment over the past five years. These Common Names: Sea herring, sardine, sild, results will likely have management implications for the species as regulators work to prevent common herring, Labrador herring, sperling overfishing from occurring in the coming years. Diminished stock size and, in turn, lowered catch limits will also impact fisheries that rely on Atlantic herring as an important source of Interesting Facts: bait, such as American lobster, blue crab, tuna, and striped bass fisheries. • Atlantic herring and other clupeid fish have exceptional hearing. They can detect sound Life History frequencies up to 40 kilohertz, beyond the Atlantic sea herring is one of 200 species in the clupeid family, which includes menhaden, range of most fish. This allows schooling fish shad, and river herring. It inhabits coastal waters of the U.S. from Cape Hatteras, North Caro- to communicate while avoiding detection by lina through Labrador, Canada, and off the coast of Europe. Herring form the base of the food predatory fish. web as a forage species for many animals, from starfish and whelk to economically import- • While most members of the clupeid family are ant fish such as haddock, cod, and flounder.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuna Fishing and a Review of Payaos in the Philippines
    Session 1 - Regional syntheses Tuna fishing and a review of payaos in the Philippines Jonathan O. Dickson*1', Augusto C. Nativiclacl(2) (1) Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources, 860 Arcadia Bldg., Quezon Avenue, Quezon City 3008, Philippines - [email protected] (2) Frabelle Fishing Company, 1051 North Bay Blvd., Navotas, Metro Manila, Philippines Abstract Payao is a traditional concept, which has been successfully commercialized to increase the landings of several species valuable to the country's export and local industries. It has become one of the most important developments in pelagic fishing that significantly contributed to increased tuna production and expansion of purse seine and other fishing gears. The introduction of the payao in tuna fishing in 1975 triggered the rapid development of the tuna and small pelagic fishery. With limited management schemes and strategies, however, unstable tuna and tuna-like species production was experienced in the 1980s and 1990s. In this paper, the evolution and development of the payao with emphasis on the technological aspect are reviewed. The present practices and techniques of payao in various parts of the country, including its structure, ownership, distribution, and fishing operations are discussed. Monitoring results of purse seine/ringnet operations including handline using payao in Celebes Sea and Western Luzon are presented to compare fishing styles and techniques, payao designs and species caught. The fishing gears in various regions of the country for harvesting payao are enumerated and discussed. The inshore and offshore payaos in terms of sea depth, location, designs, fishing methods and catch composi- tion are also compared. Fishing companies and fisherfolk associations involved in payao operation are presented to determine extent of uti- lization and involvement in the municipal and commercial sectors of the fishing industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Passage Engineering Design Criteria 2019
    FISH PASSAGE ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA 2019 37.2’ U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Northeast Region June 2019 Fish and Aquatic Conservation, Fish Passage Engineering Ecological Services, Conservation Planning Assistance United States Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5 FISH PASSAGE ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA June 2019 This manual replaces all previous editions of the Fish Passage Engineering Design Criteria issued by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5 Suggested citation: USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 2019. Fish Passage Engineering Design Criteria. USFWS, Northeast Region R5, Hadley, Massachusetts. USFWS R5 Fish Passage Engineering Design Criteria June 2019 USFWS R5 Fish Passage Engineering Design Criteria June 2019 Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ ix List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. x List of Equations ............................................................................................................................ xi List of Appendices ........................................................................................................................ xii 1 Scope of this Document ....................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Role of the USFWS Region 5 Fish Passage Engineering ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Volume III, Chapter 6 American Shad
    Volume III, Chapter 6 American Shad TABLE OF CONTENTS 6.0 American Shad (Alosa sapidissima) ........................................................................... 6-1 6.1 Introduction................................................................................................................. 6-1 6.2 Life History & Requirements...................................................................................... 6-1 6.2.1 Spawning Conditions ........................................................................................... 6-2 6.2.2 Incubation ............................................................................................................ 6-2 6.2.3 Larvae & Juveniles .............................................................................................. 6-2 6.2.4 Adult..................................................................................................................... 6-2 6.2.5 Movements in Fresh Water.................................................................................. 6-3 6.2.6 Ocean Migration.................................................................................................. 6-4 6.3 Population Identification & Distribution .................................................................... 6-4 6.3.1 Life History Differences....................................................................................... 6-4 6.3.2 Genetic Differences.............................................................................................. 6-4 6.4 Status & Abundance
    [Show full text]
  • Print 1990-05-14 Symp Artificial Reefs for Management of Marine
    INDONESIA'S EXPERIENCE OF FISH AGGREGATING DEVICES (FADS) BY HARDJONO' 1. INTRODUCTION As an archipelagic state, Indonesia is endowed with a vast area of marine waters amounting to 5.8 million km, comprising 2.8 million km of internal waters, 0.3 million km of territorial waters, and 2.7 million km of Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). Large areas of marine waters in Indonesia offer good resource potential typical of the tropics and marine fisheries play an important role in the Indonesia fisheries. Among the multispecies tropical resources available in Indonesia waters those of great value are skipjack, tuna, promfret, Spanish mackerel, snapper, grouper and some carangids. Among shellfish, shrimp (Penaeus sp.) and spiny lobster are the most expensive. Recent estimates of the fisheries potentials of the country indicate a.potentia1 reaching 6.6 million mt, comprising of 4.5 million mt ib archipelagic and territorial waters and 2.1 million mt in the EEZ. The development of marine fish production in Indonesia during the the years 1980-1987 shows an average increase of 6.22% a year. At present marine fisheries contribute 76% of the total fisheries production which by 1987 reached 2.017 million mt. As a result of diverse characteristics of the Indonesian archipelago, the country's marine fisheries are complex and varied, and are dominated by traditional fishing activities operating a large number of very small vessels. Various kinds of fishing gear are employed which are dominated by gill nets comprising nearly one third of all fishing units operated. When the amount of fish landed by different types of fishing gear is considered, payang: and purse seine contribute the largest part of fish landed amounting to about 26% of total annual fish landings.
    [Show full text]
  • Humboldt Bay Fishes
    Humboldt Bay Fishes ><((((º>`·._ .·´¯`·. _ .·´¯`·. ><((((º> ·´¯`·._.·´¯`·.. ><((((º>`·._ .·´¯`·. _ .·´¯`·. ><((((º> Acknowledgements The Humboldt Bay Harbor District would like to offer our sincere thanks and appreciation to the authors and photographers who have allowed us to use their work in this report. Photography and Illustrations We would like to thank the photographers and illustrators who have so graciously donated the use of their images for this publication. Andrey Dolgor Dan Gotshall Polar Research Institute of Marine Sea Challengers, Inc. Fisheries And Oceanography [email protected] [email protected] Michael Lanboeuf Milton Love [email protected] Marine Science Institute [email protected] Stephen Metherell Jacques Moreau [email protected] [email protected] Bernd Ueberschaer Clinton Bauder [email protected] [email protected] Fish descriptions contained in this report are from: Froese, R. and Pauly, D. Editors. 2003 FishBase. Worldwide Web electronic publication. http://www.fishbase.org/ 13 August 2003 Photographer Fish Photographer Bauder, Clinton wolf-eel Gotshall, Daniel W scalyhead sculpin Bauder, Clinton blackeye goby Gotshall, Daniel W speckled sanddab Bauder, Clinton spotted cusk-eel Gotshall, Daniel W. bocaccio Bauder, Clinton tube-snout Gotshall, Daniel W. brown rockfish Gotshall, Daniel W. yellowtail rockfish Flescher, Don american shad Gotshall, Daniel W. dover sole Flescher, Don stripped bass Gotshall, Daniel W. pacific sanddab Gotshall, Daniel W. kelp greenling Garcia-Franco, Mauricio louvar
    [Show full text]
  • Little Fish, Big Impact: Managing a Crucial Link in Ocean Food Webs
    little fish BIG IMPACT Managing a crucial link in ocean food webs A report from the Lenfest Forage Fish Task Force The Lenfest Ocean Program invests in scientific research on the environmental, economic, and social impacts of fishing, fisheries management, and aquaculture. Supported research projects result in peer-reviewed publications in leading scientific journals. The Program works with the scientists to ensure that research results are delivered effectively to decision makers and the public, who can take action based on the findings. The program was established in 2004 by the Lenfest Foundation and is managed by the Pew Charitable Trusts (www.lenfestocean.org, Twitter handle: @LenfestOcean). The Institute for Ocean Conservation Science (IOCS) is part of the Stony Brook University School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences. It is dedicated to advancing ocean conservation through science. IOCS conducts world-class scientific research that increases knowledge about critical threats to oceans and their inhabitants, provides the foundation for smarter ocean policy, and establishes new frameworks for improved ocean conservation. Suggested citation: Pikitch, E., Boersma, P.D., Boyd, I.L., Conover, D.O., Cury, P., Essington, T., Heppell, S.S., Houde, E.D., Mangel, M., Pauly, D., Plagányi, É., Sainsbury, K., and Steneck, R.S. 2012. Little Fish, Big Impact: Managing a Crucial Link in Ocean Food Webs. Lenfest Ocean Program. Washington, DC. 108 pp. Cover photo illustration: shoal of forage fish (center), surrounded by (clockwise from top), humpback whale, Cape gannet, Steller sea lions, Atlantic puffins, sardines and black-legged kittiwake. Credits Cover (center) and title page: © Jason Pickering/SeaPics.com Banner, pages ii–1: © Brandon Cole Design: Janin/Cliff Design Inc.
    [Show full text]