applied sciences

Article Retrospective Modeling of a Large Paleo-Landslide Related to Deglaciation in the Sierra de Urbión, Cordillera Ibérica, Spain

Pablo Sanz de Ojeda 1, Eugenio Sanz Pérez 1, Rubén Galindo 1,* and Cesar Sanz Riaguas 2

1 Departamento de Ingeniería y Morfología del Terreno, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, C/Profesor Aranguren s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] (P.S.d.O.); [email protected] (E.S.P.) 2 Desarrollos Logísticos y Fomento de Suelo S.L, (DELFOS), C/Narváez, 15, 28009 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract: Through a study of glacial geomorphology and retrospective modeling of the stability of the slopes, it has been possible to reconstruct and know the mechanism of the formation of a large landslide induced by the retreat of the glacier corresponding to the Picos de Urbión (Coordillera Ibérica, Spain) during the last glacial cycle. It is a rotational landslide of 150 Mm3 that involved a layer of lutites and clays of the Cameros Basin that outcropped on one of the slopes of the valley, and whose initial geometry was modified by the over-excavation of the glacier tongue, which reached 140 m in height. The breakage occurred when the support of the ice tongue was partially removed. The structural layout and high water table also contributed to the landslide. It is the first time



that landslides associated with the deglaciations of the last glacial cycle have been retrospectively
 modeled, which may be of interest when applied to geomorphological sciences.

Citation: Sanz de Ojeda, P.; Sanz Pérez, E.; Galindo, R.; Sanz Riaguas, Keywords: paleolandslide; deglaciation; large and rotational landslide; numerical simulation; C. Retrospective Modeling of a Large Iberian range Paleo-Landslide Related to Deglaciation in the Sierra de Urbión, Cordillera Ibérica, Spain. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4277. https://doi.org/ 1. Introduction and Objectives 10.3390/app11094277 Slope movements in mountains affected by glacierism can be strongly influenced by the advance and, especially, by the retreat of glaciers. The advances of the ice through the Academic Editor: José A. Peláez valleys excavate and cause a decompression in the rock mass. However, when the glacier retreats, the slope is left without ice support, the valley is deeper, the excavated slopes Received: 15 April 2021 steeper, and decompression continues. Accepted: 5 May 2021 Steep slopes and greater than 500 m can undergo slow and continuous deformation, Published: 9 May 2021 characterized by its bulging and the appearance of lateral escarpments parallel to the level lines (“sackung”). It is a gravitational spreading or gravitational slope deformation [1–3]. Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral Their formation is usually previous to the generation of large landslides [4–6]. If these with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affil- landslides originated natural dams and lakes upstream, the dating of these lake sediments iations. can be used to assess the risk of flooding due to the collapse of these dams [7], or for paleoclimatic investigations and geomorphological evolution studies, such as improving the information on deglaciation in mountain areas (for example, in the Pyrenees [8]). The formation of large deep landslides due to the retreat of valley glaciers after the last glacial cycle has been described in many mountainous areas, such as the Alps, Himalaya, Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. Rocky Mountains, Andes, New Zealand, etc. [9–13]. Additionally, in mountains recently Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. abandoned by glaciers, where the retreat and thinning of glaciers have been experienced This article is an open access article worldwide in recent decades as a result of global warming, it has directly affected the distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons stability of the slopes (for example, in Patagonia [14]). Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// In Spain, they are described in the Cantabrian Mountains in [15], for example or in creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ the Pyrenees [16–22]. Although in the Iberian Range the Demanda, Neila, Cebollera, and 4.0/). Moncayo mountain ranges were affected by Pleistocene glacierism, most of the time they

Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4277. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11094277 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/applsci Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4277 2 of 20

were glacier cirques with tongue of little erosive capacity and incapable of generating these phenomena. There is only one antecedent to the case presented here, where a notable example of a landslide associated with the retreat of the 5 km glacier on the north face of the Picos de Urbión is briefly described [23]. On the other hand, and as is known, the identification, recognition, inventory, and detailed study of these movements can inform us about the failure mechanisms and the causes that generated them. A good characterization of a landslide includes an adequate investigation of the internal architecture and hydrogeology, and in the works [24–26], we can find good examples of case studies of large landslides and of the different methodolo- gies followed. When retrospective modeling is done, the initial topography before the landslide has to be reconstituted, and in this sense, the three-dimensional reconstruction of the pre- landslide topography has been carried out by several authors using different methodologies and applying different criteria [27,28]. The objectives pursued in this work are the following: (1) Characterize this great landslide from the geological and geomorphological point of view; (2) Reconstruction of the original slope and, after geomechanical characterization of the geological materials and hydrogeological conditions, analyze the failure using an appropriate numerical model in order to identify the factors and causes that have controlled the development of the landslide (back analysis); (3) Integrate the process of landslide within the context of paleo- evolution and deglaciation of the glacier of the Picos de Urbión.

2. Site Description 2.1. Study Area The Sierra de Urbión is part of the northwestern sector of the Iberian range. It is one of the highest mountain ranges in the Iberian System, in northern Spain, reaching its maximum altitude at 2228 m above sea level (Figure1). This mountain range serves as a watershed between the Duero river basin and the Ebro river basin. The north slope includes, among others, the headwaters of the Urbión river, a tributary of the Najerilla river, and which is a tributary of the Ebro, while in the southern slope has its source the river Duero. The main watershed runs from west to east and is approximately 25 km long, the highest elevation being the Picos de Urbión, although there are other holm oak peaks of 2000 m, such as Zorraquin (2105 m) or Muñalba (2073 m). To the east it continues with the Sierra de Cebollera, and to the west by the Sierra de Neila, both with peaks a little over 2000 m. The climate is Mediterranean and mountainous, with wet tendencies. Average annual rainfall is probably above 1500–1600 mm in the main watershed, falling mainly in Spring and Winter. According to Camarero and Gutiérrez [29], the minimum of precipitation is in Summer (from July and August), and the maximum from November to February. The Atlantic influence is more noticeable on the northern slope than on the southern one. In the summits a certain aridity is observed in July and August since the precipitation is less than 40 mm. The Urbión mountain range was affected by Pleistocene glacierism, which in the valley of the north face studied here left U-shaped valley up to 5 km long (Figure 2), descending the glacier to 1270 m.a.s.l. [30]. The studies on quaternary glacierism began at the beginning of the 20th century with the work of Carandell and Gómez de Llarena [31], and which continued Thornes [32], and Sanz Pérez [33]. The identification of different glacial stages was possible in the Neila and Urbión mountain range thanks to sedimentological studies in Laguna Grande and Laguna de Hornillo, respectively [34,35]. Another palynological study in the Urbión mountain range [36] covers the last 15,000 years. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4277 3 of 20 Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 21

FigureFigure 1. Location 1. Location of theof the Picos Picos de de Urbi Urbiónón andand thethe Urbión Urbión river river valley. valley. Location Location of specific of specific study study area. area. 2.2. Substrate Geology 2.2. Substrate Geology The general architecture of the Urbión mountain range is resolved in a great slope The general architecture of the Urbión mountain range is resolved in a great slope whose structure is determined by the soft and generalized inclination of the stratigraphic whoseseries structure towards the is determined south, with variable by thesoft dips and between generalized 9° and 20°. inclination The front ofof thethe stratigraphicslope is ◦ ◦ seriesoriented towards to the the north, south, which with is where variable the dips oldest between layers emerge. 9 and Thus, 20 . Thegoing front up the of valley the slope is orientedof the toUrbión the north, river, whichfrom where is where the theglacier oldest ended layers up emerge. to the Picos Thus, de going Urbión up in the a valley of thenorth–south Urbión river,direction, from there where are the the following glacier ended types of up grounds to the Picosarranged de from Urbi óoldestn in ato north– southmost direction, modern [37] there (Figure are the2): (25) following Cambrian types quartzites, of grounds on which arranged (24) sandstones, from oldest con- to most modernglomerates, [37] (Figure marls and 2): (25)clays Cambrian of the Triassic quartzites, are supported on which in (24) discordance. sandstones, Above conglomerates, it ap- marlspears and a Jurassic clays of calcareous the Triassic sequence are supported consisting in of discordance. about 350 m Aboveof dolomite, it appears limestone, a Jurassic calcareousand dolomitic sequence limestone consisting (23). These of about Paleozoic, 350 mTriassic, of dolomite, and Jurassic limestone, outcrops and extend dolomitic limestonealmost exclusively (23). These along Paleozoic, the northern Triassic, slope; and for Jurassic example, outcrops limestone extend can reach almost altitudes exclusively close to 1900 m, at the head of our landslide. The Tera, Oncala, and Urbión groups are along the northern slope; for example, limestone can reach altitudes close to 1900 m, at located on top of the calcareous marine Jurassic and in soft discordance, belonging to the the head of our landslide. The Tera, Oncala, and Urbión groups are located on top of the facies of the Cameros Basin (Upper Jurassic–Lower Cretaceous), and which are consti- calcareoustuted primarily marine by Jurassic the unitand (22) informed soft discordance,by clays and purple belonging lutites to and the sandstones. facies of the It has Cameros Basina thickness (Upper in Jurassic–Lower the area of the slide Cretaceous), of 160 m, andbut it which is highly are variable constituted and primarilycan also present by the unit (22)lateral formed change by clays of facies. and This purple is the lutites unit wh andere sandstones. the landslide It has has occurred. a thickness Above, in the the areaunit of the slide(21) of is 160 distinguished m, but it iswhere highly there variable is a powerful and can series also of present up to 500 lateral m of changealternating of facies.strata This is theof sandstones, unit where conglomerates the landslide and has marl, occurred. and wh Above,ich is more the competent unit (21) is than distinguished the previous where thereone. is It a ends powerful with the series unit of (20) up in to the 500 summits m of alternating of Urbión, strata formed of by sandstones, a very hard conglomerates level of andquartzite marl, and conglomerates, which is more massive, competent 80 to 200 than m the thick, previous which one.gives It rise ends to withthe ledges the unit and (20) in therocky summits outcrops of Urbi at theón, top. formed by a very hard level of quartzite conglomerates, massive, 80 to 200In mthe thick, area of which the landslide, gives rise the to geological the ledges contacts and rocky of the outcrops layers (23)–(22)–(21) at the top. are parallel,In the with area an of east–west the landslide, direction, the and geological dip about contacts 30° to the of south; the layersthe contact (23)–(22)–(21) (22)–(23) are is flexed decreasing the dip towards the north up to 10°. parallel, with an east–west direction, and dip about 30◦ to the south; the contact (22)–(23) is flexed decreasing the dip towards the north up to 10◦.

2.3. Geomorphology and Surface Formations Linked to the Quaternary Glacierism of the Urbión River Valley Before the quaternary, these rock masses of the Urbión mountain range were modeled with smooth shapes and regularized slopes, defining a summit line at 2000 m which is not as clearly manifested as in the neighboring Cebollera mountain range. Later, a glacierism was installed in the highest sections of the valleys, accommodating the pre-existing relief. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4277 4 of 20

In Urbión, the special morphology with a gentle slope at high altitude, the orientation of the mountain range, and the greater influence, as in Neila, of the wet masses from the northwest, determined the development of valley glaciers of certain size on the north and Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 21 east slopes [38]. The orientation in the shade and the overfeeding of the snow due to the effect of the blizzard favored the accumulation and conservation of ice.

filling Thein the cirque middle is of subdivided the slope, lowering intotwo the outer other; slope the until western very low one attached is larger to the and more excavated slope,than theas if easternfed by rimaye. one, whichThis moraine has softeris made slopes up of sandy (Figure reddish2). Thatsediments one and was a better fed by the siltyblizzard matrix andand few should boulders. be theIt has engine developed and soil main where producer the pines take of glacierroot. This ice. soil In the middle of andthe the two, type a of deposit alteration corresponding is exactly the same to in the these start three of zones, the medialbut different moraine, from theoriginated by the soilunion developed of the on two the lateral glacial moraines tongues, of the has upper been part preserved of the valley.at an elevation of 1900 m. In the The end of the glacier does not present terminal moraines, but it can be recognized inleft the cirque topography (called by the Alborta), trace of erosion where ca therved Urbiin theó nvalley Lagoon by the is tongue. located, Thus, there to- is a large basal wardsmoraine an elevation containing of 1270 coarse m, the andprofile very of the coarse valley changes boulders from [39 more]. About or less concave 800 m below there is an slopesover-excavation to rectilinear carvedslopes. This into should the substrate, be interpreted as wellas a supporting as somesmall argument, moraine alt- deposits on the houghbasal (Figurethe existence2). of these hanging lateral moraines is conclusive evidence of the true extent of the glacier.

Figure 2. 2.GeomorphologyGeomorphology of the valley of the of valleyglacial origin of glacial of the originPicos deof Urbión the Picos(modified de Urbifrom [38]).ón (modified from [38]). Glacial geomorphology and slope forms: 1. Glacial cirque boundary; 2. Scarp of glacial erosion; 3. MaximumGlacial geomorphology limit of ice spread; 4. and Lateral slope moraine; forms: 5. Medial 1. Glacial moraine; cirque 6. Lateral boundary; obturation 2. moraine Scarp of glacial erosion; 3. deposits;Maximum 7. Landslide limit of scar; ice 8. spread; Landslide. 4. Gravitatio Lateral moraine;nal motion; 5.9. Alluvial Medial fa moraine;n induced by 6. landslide; Lateral obturation moraine 10.deposits; Scarp in 7.the Landslide landslide foot scar; and 8.alluvial Landslide. fan; 11. Recessional Gravitational lateral motion; moraines; 9. 12. Alluvial Undifferenti- fan induced by landslide; ated till; 13. Tills removed by stream waters. Alluvials built by the erosion of moraines; 14. Protalus 10.rampart; Scarp 15. in Recent the landslidealluvial fan; foot 16. Debris and alluvialand boulders; fan; 17. 11. Glacial Recessional lagoon; 18. lateral Ponds, moraines; old glacial 12. Undifferentiated lagoons,till; 13. hydromorphic Tills removed soils; by 19. streamSprings. Bedroc waters.k Geology: Alluvials Facies built belonging by the to the erosion late Juras- of moraines; 14. Protalus sic-Lower Cretaceous of the Cameros Basin; 20. Conglomerates, Urbion Group; 21. Sandstones and lutites.rampart; Oncala 15. Group. Recent Grupo alluvial Oncala; fan; 22. 16.Lutites, Debris clays, and marls boulders; and sandstones. 17. Glacial Tera Group. lagoon; Marine 18. Ponds, old glacial lagoons, hydromorphic soils; 19. Springs. Bedrock Geology: Facies belonging to the late Jurassic- Lower Cretaceous of the Cameros Basin; 20. Conglomerates, Urbion Group; 21. Sandstones and lutites. Oncala Group. Grupo Oncala; 22. Lutites, clays, marls and sandstones. Tera Group. Marine Jurassic; 23. Limestones. Triassic; 24. Sandstones, dolomites and clays. Paleozoic; 25. Quartzites; 26. Stratification traces. Competent layers; 27. Dip. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4277 5 of 20

In the left cirque there are erosive and sedimentation traces corresponding to marginal glaciers. Traces of snowfield moraines (protalus rampant) remain on the left slope, one in arc-shaped, and the other more rectilinear on the upper side. The large moraine of the Urbión Lagoon is kept very fresh, with two arches corresponding to the respective backward pulsations. Further to the left appears another fork-shaped one that holds another small lagoon. There are coarse and very coarse boulders transported by the ice. In the right cirque the protalus rampant had, as expected, much less development. Here there are small arc-shaped and rectilinear snowfield moraines, which also reveal two pulsations. The valley has a very characteristic, asymmetrical “U” profile, as the slopes on the left bank have supported the action of snowfields that fed the glacier on this side. The left zone lacked important snowfields. The lateral moraine is very well preserved, with a start at 1930 m. under Cerro Pantorra, where it is modified by the action of old snowfields from the glacial retreat phase, mixing up the moraines of both devices. There are other clearer regions along the slope of the valley, which gives a descent slope of 6◦ to 7◦. This moraine causes lagoons of obstruction of very little importance. At the bottom there is an over-excavation gap carved into the substrate, as well as some small bottom moraine deposits. In the cirque on the right side there are alluvial deposits in sheets, which cover the slopes, originated by the erosion of the moraines at the bottom. On the right slope, at an elevation 1700 m, there are three aligned regions of lateral moraine. This shows the asymmetry of the glacial tongue, with a transverse slope to the right of 10◦. On the right slope, the substrate outcrops, and in the lower part a blanket of debris spreads. In general, the valley loses its typical “U” shape downstream of 1580 m, but it is undoubted that below this level the lower parts of the slopes have been retouched by ice, acquiring a profile that tends to approach “U” but not clearly in V either; furthermore, the left slope is distorted by convex ledges due to later slope movements and alluvial fans. At the maximum advance of the glacier there are three pieces of lateral moraines located on both slopes of the lower part of the valley, three on the right (1700, 1655, and 1625 m) and one on the left (1645 m) (Figures2 and3). The right lateral moraine deposit located at 1625 m has a rectilinear projection and a sharp top, raised about 2–4 m on the flat bottom of a valley filled with moraine plugging deposits that closed the glacier with this moraine. Its transverse profile is triangular, filling in the middle of the slope, lowering the outer slope until very low attached to the slope, as if fed by rimaye. This moraine is made up of sandy reddish sediments and a silty matrix and few boulders. It has developed soil where the pines take root. This soil and the type of alteration is exactly the same in these three zones, but different from the soil developed on the lateral moraines of the upper part of the valley. The end of the glacier does not present terminal moraines, but it can be recognized in the topography by the trace of erosion carved in the valley by the tongue. Thus, towards an elevation of 1270 m, the profile of the valley changes from more or less concave slopes to rectilinear slopes. This should be interpreted as a supporting argument, although the existence of these hanging lateral moraines is conclusive evidence of the true extent of the glacier. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 21

Table 1. Dimensions of the landslide of the Picos de Urbión according to terminology of Dikau et al. [40].

Notation Dimensions (m) Meausurement Type Wd Width of the displaced mass 600 direct (field) Ld Length of the displaced mass 1200 direct (field) Dd Maximum depth of the displaced mass 200 deduced (field profile) Hd Height of the displaced mass 400 deduced (field profile) Wr Width of the failure surface 800 Numerical model (Figure 8) Lr Length of the failure surface 1200 Numerical model (Figure 7)

Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4277 Dr Average depth of the failure surface 150 Numerical model (Figure6 of 8) 20 Hr Height of the failure surface 400 Numerical model (Figure 8) L Total lengh of the landslide 1200 Numerical model (Figure 7)

Figure 3.3. ((A)) GeneralGeneral aspectaspect ofof thethe valley valley of of glacial glacial origin origin of of the the Urbi Urbiónón river river with with indication indication of of the the head head of theof the landslide. landslide. In theIn the background background Picos Picos de de Urbi Urbiónón (2228 (2228 m); m); (B ).(B View). View of theof the bottom bottom of theof the landslide landslide (L). (L). The The arrow arrow indicates indicates the the location location of theof the right right lateral lateral moraine moraine of the of the glacier glacier maximum; maximum; (C). ( ViewC). View of the of landslide the landslide from from upstream upstream of the of Urbi theó Urbiónn River River Valley. Valley. Slope landslideSlope landslide of the Urbiof theón Urbión river valley; river (Dvalley;). Front (D view). Front of the view landslide of the andlandslide alluvial and fan alluvial (shaded). fan Note (shaded). the lateral Note moraine the lateral on moraine on the left margin. the left margin. 3. Methodology The research methodology has been the following: • Raising of a geomorphological and geological cartography at a scale of 1:5000 per- formed by interpretation of aerial photography analysis from stereoscopic aerial photography, and an intense field survey. The field work has included a detailed de- scription of the morphological characteristics of the sliding mass and of the formations of glacial origin associated in the vicinity. The geological work includes the taking of representative undisturbed samples for their geomechanical characterization in the laboratory, corresponding to the layer of lutites involved in the landslide, in an area that has not undergone movement, with the intention of knowing the conditions prior to it; Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4277 7 of 20

• To know the current hydrogeological conditions of the landslide, an inventory has been made of the existing water points (springs, and streams with permanent water, as well as currents and ephemeral water points and water sinks within the landslide area and its surroundings); • A methodology has been proposed to reconstruct the pre-slide topography in 3D which, although it has a certain degree of subjectivism, we believe is close to sufficient detail for the purposes of modeling. The steps to be followed for the reconstruction of the topographic and geological profile are explained in Section 4.2 since before it is necessary to explain the geological and geomorphological characteristics of the site; • Recreated the initial topography before the landslide, it has been possible to obtain an adequate prediction of reality through a 3D model using the FLAC 3D geotechnical calculation program in order to identify the possible causes and factors that have intervened in it.

4. Results 4.1. Landslide Characteristics and Dimensions The characteristics of this earth movement correspond to a large rotational landslide that affects the clays and lutites of the unit (22). Despite its age, it retains its own character- istics: a main scarp 155 m high, whose upper edge reaches the Cerro de Navillas (1925 m) (Figures2 and3). This scarp has an asymmetric semicircular projection and is 1000 m long, covering the entire width of the outcrop of the unit (22), and being the contact with limestone (23) to the north and with sandstones (21) to the south. There is a head at the foot of the scarp with flooded areas (around 1765 m). The landslide extends 1.2 km in length to the river, and the removed mass expands downward with an average width of about 800 m (Figure3). The area is about 0.75 km 2. As the maximum depth of the failure surface is about 200 m, this slide involves around 150 Mm3. The most characteristic of the slipped mass is an irregular ridged relief in transverse grooves subparallel to each other (Figures2 and3). The foot invaded more than 1 km of the river that moved 250 m to the east, bringing the riverbed into contact between the landslide and the right slope, between levels 1490 and 1540 m, approximately. The slope of the landslide is about 400 m. The foot has a scarp of 20 to 25 m as a result of the deepening of the Urbión river (see Table1).

Table 1. Dimensions of the landslide of the Picos de Urbión according to terminology of Dikau et al. [40].

Notation Dimensions (m) Meausurement Type

Wd Width of the displaced mass 600 direct (field) Ld Length of the displaced mass 1200 direct (field) Dd Maximum depth of the displaced mass 200 deduced (field profile) Hd Height of the displaced mass 400 deduced (field profile) Wr Width of the failure surface 800 Numerical model (Figure 8) Lr Length of the failure surface 1200 Numerical model (Figure 7) Dr Average depth of the failure surface 150 Numerical model (Figure 8) Hr Height of the failure surface 400 Numerical model (Figure 8) L Total lengh of the landslide 1200 Numerical model (Figure 7)

Within the slipped mass, a subscarp (minor scarp) is seen in the upper part where two appreciable water sprout are born at the 1720 m elevation that originates the source of the stream that forms the alluvial fan. There are other small surfaces as a consequence of minor landslides below. The mobilized material consists mainly of a mass of lutites and clays, but there are also fragments and boulders of sandstone. In the upper part of the landslide, the material comes entirely from unit (22), but from the middle downwards there are also materials similar to those of the nearby lateral moraine, formed by sandy reddish earth, although their distinction is not easy. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4277 8 of 20

The mobilized lutites have undergone an alteration and clayey materials predominate on its surface. This surface alteration of these lutites is a characteristic of these when they are exposed to the atmospheric agents for short periods of time. It is common to verify the degradation of up to 5 m in depth on the slopes cuts of the roads of the area in a few years. It also constitutes a problem in the conservation of the dinosaur ichnite sites when the soil that covered them has been removed.

4.2. Pre-Landslide Topography and Geology Reconstruction The retrospective analysis of a landslide through mathematical modeling requires knowledge of the topography and geology prior to it. This is a characteristic difficulty in landslides as old as this one. However, and despite having a certain degree of subjec- tivism, we believe that in this case there are geomorphological-geological criteria of the environment and information on the geometry of the landslide sufficient to address this aspect with guarantee. Thus, a methodology is proposed to reconstruct the pre-landslide topography in 3D that approximates with sufficient detail to the proposed purposes. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 21 The reasoned steps that have been followed for the reconstruction of the topographic and geological profile are the following (see Figure4):

Figure 4. Process followed in the reconstruction of the relief before the landslide (see explanation in Figure 4. Process followed in the reconstruction of the relief before the landslide (see explanation in text): (A) Current topography in the area of the slope; (B). Reconstruction of the topographic and text): (A) Current topography in the area of the slope; (B). Reconstruction of the topographic and geology of the slope during the maximum advance of the glacier and under the ice of the glacier geologytongue and of the without slope moraines. during the (21) maximum Sandstones advance and lutites of the (22) glacier Lutites and and under clays the (23) ice limestone; of the glacier (C). tongueTopographic and without map in moraines.the situation (21) of Sandstonesthe maximum and advance lutites of (22) the Lutites glacier andand clayswith a (23) thickness limestone; of (theC). Topographicglacial tongue map of 140 in the m; situation(D). Topographic of the maximum map in advancethe situation of the of glacierregression and withof the a glacier thickness and of thewith glacial a thickness tongue of of the 140 glac m;ier (D tongue). Topographic of about map 40 m. in the situation of regression of the glacier and with a thickness of the glacier tongue of about 40 m.

1. First, it is necessary to start from two certainties: one, that the failure of the landslide exclusively affected the formation of clays and lutites (unit 22), and is limited towards the base, by the presence of the hard layers of limestone (contact 22–23) north and in depth, and to the roof by unit 21 that outcrops to the south. The second certainty is that the slide occurred at some point in the retreat of the glacier during deglaciation. This is evident since the lateral moraine that remains with the slide has been cut by it (Figure3D). It is seen that the moraine continued on the slope where the movement occurred. In other words, the slope was stable before the glaciation and also during the maximum advance of the glacier (supporting the slope by the ice tongue).

Figure 5. Geological sections (I)-(I’) and (II)-(II’) of Figure 4B. (8): Landslide deposit from (22); (21): sandstones and lut- ites; (22): lutites and clays; (23): limestones. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4277 9 of 20

The fact that the slope remained stable with its natural slope before the glaciation is very interesting from the geotechnical point of view, since it informs us of the minimum angle of stability. This angle is 14◦ and is the one that has the slopes of the valley above the lateral moraines not affected by the glacial excavation and which are very well preserved. The height of the slope before the glaciation was about 300 m (1900–1600 m). 2. Reconstruction of the topography of the pre-glacial valley is not difficult as it is fairly well preserved in the upper part of the slopes unaffected by glacier erosion. It is a regularized and constant slope of about 14◦ that, prolonged for both slopes downwards, emerges a height from the bottom of the pre-glacial valley in this sector where the landslide is located (towards 1600 m) (Figures2 and3). It is thus deduced that on the left bank, where the outcrop of clays and lutites gave rise to the landslide, was stable with a natural slope of 14◦ and a drop of 300 m (1900 from the head minus 1600 m from the bottom of the valley). In the area affected by the landslide, the lateral moraines on the left bank, which were dragged by this mass movement, are not preserved. In the area on the right bank, the lateral moraine perched over three valleys, as has been said, is very well preserved. 3. However, we are interested in knowing the topography and geology just before the landslide, as a result of the excavation of the pre-existing valley by the glacier. Thus, the contour lines of the slopes of both sides of the landslide have been extrapo- lated, both on the slopes above the lateral moraines not affected by glacial erosion with a slope of about 14◦, and on the slopes below the moraines, with a slope of about 40◦. The limit for the extrapolation of both slopes is imposed by the deduction of the situation of the maximum extent of glacier ice according to the location of the lateral moraines. It has also been taken into account that the axis of the bottom of the valley before the landslide was located about 250 m to the west of the current one, since the mass movement invaded it and displaced the river to the east. This displacement can be very well measured by joining the rectilinear north–south channel of the Urbión River upstream and downstream of the landslide (Figure 9(0)). The bottom of the valley was also about 20 or 25 m above the current one: this can be observed very well in the unevenness of the river embedding in the mass of the slide and in the associated alluvial fan (Figures2 and3B). All this has been taken into account to reconstruct the topography of the valley excavated by the glacier that is presented in the geological map of Figure4B. To reconstruct the geology of the substrate in the valley, the contour map method has been used, drawing geological contacts 22–23 and 22–21 in the pre-glacial topography, for which the current outcrops and dips have been used. This is what is represented in Figure4B , that is, the geology of the substrate under the surface formations of the moraines, the mass of the landslide and the alluvial fan. On the topography of Figure4B, the thickness of the lateral moraines has been added, supposedly covering the entire valley. The end result is a topographic map of the valley floor before the slide, under the ice of the tongue, which is not shown here. In Figure4C the exterior topography is represented with the level curves of the glacier surface at its maximum apogee, assuming this gently convex and slightly asymmetric surface as a result of taking into account the altitudes of the moraines, of about 25 m higher elevation on the left than on the right. We have assumed that the bottom of the valley is the situation of the maximum glacier phase, and that this bottom no longer descended when the glacier was receding. If we admit this, it follows from these maps that the maximum thickness of the glacier tongue at its maximum advance was, in this zone of the slide, of no more than 140 m. 4. Reconstruction of the topography during the retreat of the Pico de Urbión glacier. Although the logical thing was to think that the slope would failure until the complete disappearance of the glacier, canceling the wall-wedge effect of the ice at the foot of the slope, they have tried to simulate the intermediate situations in the retreat of the glacier to exhaust all the possibilities. Thus, in Figure4D, the topography in the glacial retreat is represented by way of example, considering a thickness of the ice tongue of 40 m and keeping the bottom topography constant. In the latter situation, the glacial front had Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 21

Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4277 10 of 20

receded almost 2 km and was in this sector of the valley. The end of the glacier was residually restricted to the narrow valley bottom, increasing its volume on the rise of the topographic step of contact 21–22. If we look at the profile corresponding to the final situation in Figure 9(2), the difference in slope level has increased with respect to before the glaciation from 300 to 375 m and, ◦ with respect to theFigure slope, 4. Process it remains followed 14 inabove the reconstruction 1675 m, up of tothe 1900 relief mbefore from thethe landslide summit. (see explanation It in ◦ has increased in thetext): lower (A) Current part to topography 40 from in 1675 the area m to of thethe slope; bottom, (B). Reconstruction located around of the 1525 topographic m. and Figure5 showsgeology two geologicalof the slope during sections the maximum along the advance landslide of the where glacier itand can under be seenthe ice that of the glacier practically the entiretongue unit and (22) without has been moraines. mobilized, (21) Sandstones limitof and the lutites failure (22) Lutites in depth, and clays and which(23) limestone; (C). Topographic map in the situation of the maximum advance of the glacier and with a thickness of has been exceededthe in glacial the foottongue of of the 140slide. m; (D). TheTopographic dip, relatively map in the in situation favor of regression the slope, of the has glacier and contributed to thewith landslide. a thickness of the glacier tongue of about 40 m.

FigureFigure 5. Geological 5. Geological sections sections (I)-(I’) and (I)-( (III’)-() andII’) of (II Figure)-(II’) 4B. ofFigure (8): Landslide4B. (8): deposi Landslidet from deposit (22); (21): from sandstones (22); (21): and lut- ites; (22):sandstones lutites and and clays; lutites; (23): (22):limestones. lutites and clays; (23): limestones.

With regard to retrospective modeling, and taking into account all these considerations, the hypothetical geometric configurations have been reconstructed before the landslide (Figure6). In this way, the sliding conditions can be reproduced when a stability analysis is performed starting from the original geometry.

4.3. Hydrogeological Context The limestones and dolomites of the marine Jurassic (23) are very permeable and give rise to karst aquifers in the area, associated with important upwellings, such as those of Viniegra de Cameros, or the source of the Arlanza river, which constitutes a natural transfer of water from the Ebro basin of the Sierra de Urbion to the Duero basin [41,42]. Small dolines and karren abound in the limestone surrounding the landslide, quite frequent in the area [43]. The lithologies (21) and (22) are generally quite impermeable, especially the clays and lutites, although there are sometimes small springs associated with the sandstone levels. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4277 11 of 20 Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 11 of 21

Figure 6. Initial geometryFigure 6. considered Initial geometry for the considered 3D simulation. for the 3D simulation.

In the area4.3. of Hydrogeological the landslide Context in particular, there are hardly any springs at the foot of it, and the UrbiTheón riverlimestones in this and section dolomites is not of affected. the marine The Jurassic rest of the(23) landslide are very ispermeable and relatively wetgive and rise hydromorphic to karst aquifers soils in sometimes the area, associated appear although with important not as much upwellings, as one such as those would expectof from Viniegra a large de loose Cameros, mass likeor the this source one. Itof isthe quite Arlanza possible river, that which the slippedconstitutes a natural mass has undergroundtransfer of drainagewater from directed the Ebro towards basin limestoneof the Sierra below de Urbion on which to the it largelyDuero basin [41,42]. rests. This goodSmall underground dolines and drainage karren mustabound have in influencedthe limestone the stabilitysurrounding of the the landslide landslide, quite fre- once it was formed.quent in However, the area the[43]. important The lithologies springs (21) are and at the (22) top, are where generally two sourcesquite impermeable, of es- 1 L/s each appear,pecially in low the water,clays and at an lutites, elevation although of 1720 ther m,e and are whichsometimes gives small rise to springs a stream associated with that circulatesthe through sandstone the bedlevels. of a torrent, filtering in the sediments of its alluvial fan (Figure4D). These springsIn the area must of be the related landslide to the inpresence particular, of ath sandstoneere are hardly level any interspersed springs at the foot of it, between the claysand the and Urbión lutites ofriver the in substrate this section and is for not an affected. unknown The reason rest of they the sprout landslide in is relatively the upper-middlewet and part hydromorphic of the slope. Theysoils sometimes are well fed appear by the although recharge not that as operates much as in one would ex- the watershedpect at 1900 from m. a Inlarge any loose case, mass it is indicating like this one. that It the is waterquite possible table is linkedthat the to slipped the mass has substrate and is high, with a hydraulic gradient that follows the slope of the slope. This is underground drainage directed towards limestone below on which it largely rests. This very significant in order to know the causes of the slope movement, since the same situation good underground drainage must have influenced the stability of the landslide once it of the water table at the head has been preserved until now, in reality it is making us see was formed. However, the important springs are at the top, where two sources of 1 l/s the importance that the water table should have had. In fact, the spring area coincides with each appear, in low water, at an elevation of 1720 m, and which gives rise to a stream that a minor slide. circulates through the bed of a torrent, filtering in the sediments of its alluvial fan (Figure 4.4. Geotechnical4D). Characterization These springs of must the Materials be related Involved to the presence of a sandstone level interspersed be- 4.4.1. Geotechnicaltween Interpretation the clays and oflutites the Geomorphology of the substrate and of the for Place an unknown reason they sprout in the upper-middle part of the slope. They are well fed by the recharge that operates in the Apart from the laboratory tests on representative samples of the sliding unit (22), there watershed at 1900 m. In any case, it is indicating that the water table is linked to the sub- is a geotechnical reading of the geomorphology of the landslide zone: strate and is high, with a hydraulic gradient that follows the slope of the slope. This is A. The slopevery of significant the unit (22) in beforeorder to the know landslide the causes was stable of the with slope a movement, 300 m drop since and a the same situ- ◦ 14 slope.ation of the water table at the head has been preserved until now, in reality it is making B. The landslide occurred with a slope height of 375 m and a slope in the upper half us see◦ the importance◦ that the water table should have had. In fact, the spring area coin- (250 m)cides of 14 withand a 40 minorin the slide. lower half (150 m), approximately. C. The lateral moraines have remained stable for thousands of years as fillings in the mid-slope of 140 m in height with a slope of 40◦. The only area where it has not remained stable is when it rested on the unit (22). Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4277 12 of 20

4.4.2. Inference of the Geotechnical Characteristics of the Lutites Unit These lutites and sandstone materials, corresponding to the Tera Group very close to contact with the limestone of the marine Jurassic, have been tested in detail in the foundation of the Castrovido dam in the Arlanza river (Burgos). That is, they correspond to the same stratigraphic location, where Alonso et al. [44] made an extensive study of these lutites with field and laboratory geomechanical characterization, indicating effective cohesion values between 20 and 100 kN/m2 and effective friction angle values between 17◦ and 33◦.

4.5. Back Analysis Once the pre-failure topography has been recreated, its stability was studied using a 3D model with the software fast Lagrangian analyses of continuous (FLAC) 3D, a software developed for the geotechnical calculation by ITASCA group. It is based on the method of finite differences, which allows the use of non-linear behavior laws, with an explicit resolution scheme of the differential equations of the geotechnical problem. Although the medium is divided into elements formed by quadrilaterals, FLAC internally divides the quadrilateral into two superimposed groups of triangles of constant deformation of triangular elements. The values of the geomechanical parameters of the sandstones and limestones substra- tum do not control the failure but must be reasonably estimated. All materials are modeled with a Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion, with parameters assigned according to Table2, where the average values proposed by [45] for the sandstones and limestones have been used. The lowest strength corresponds to lutites, where instability is predictable and the geotechnical characteristics that have been considered correspond to the study interval of the geotechnical research referenced [44]. Therefore, it is advisable to conduct a sensitivity analysis to study global stability with different geotechnical parameters that define the level of lutites.

Table 2. Geomechanical parameters of the different lithologies.

Apparent Effective Effective Young’s Poisson’s Stratigraphic Density Cohesion Friction Angle Modulus Modulus Unit γ (kN/m3) c (kN/m2) ϕ (◦) E (kN/m2) ν Sandstone * 26.5 200 40 250,000 0.30 Limestones * 26 50 38 200,000 0.30 Lutites 24 20–100 17–33 70,000 0.25 * The geomechanical values of these strata can be consulted in Table 1 of the chapter IX and Table 3 of the chapter XIII of [45].

For the boundary conditions, horizontal constraints for laterals contours and both horizontal and vertical constraints for the lower boundary of the model are considered. First of all, initial stresses under static conditions (only under vertical gravity loading) are calculated, considering the water pressure caused by the situation of the water table at the head as is indicated in Section 4.3. The estimation of horizontal effective stresses has been performed with Jaky’s formula because, even if this is not a horizontal layered soil configuration, it can be considered accurate enough for this estimation. For the back analysis, a sensitivity analysis by varying the strength parameters of the geotechnical unit of lutites is considered. It has been necessary to reduce cohesion to values of 20 kN/m2 and friction angles of 24◦ to induce breakage. A lower value of cohesion for this material is hardly realistic as previously mentioned. As can be analyzed, these values are consistent with those studied by Alonso el al. [44]. Figure7 shows the 3D failure surface obtained where the extent of the landslide can be clearly seen, which entirely affects the lutites unit and which acquires a spoon shape inserted in this stratigraphic unit. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 13 of 21

For the boundary conditions, horizontal constraints for laterals contours and both horizontal and vertical constraints for the lower boundary of the model are considered. First of all, initial stresses under static conditions (only under vertical gravity loading) are calculated, considering the water pressure caused by the situation of the water table at the head as is indicated in Section 4.3. The estimation of horizontal effective stresses has been performed with Jaky’s formula because, even if this is not a horizontal layered soil configuration, it can be considered accurate enough for this estimation. For the back analysis, a sensitivity analysis by varying the strength parameters of the geotechnical unit of lutites is considered. It has been necessary to reduce cohesion to values of 20 kN/m2 and friction angles of 24° to induce breakage. A lower value of cohe- sion for this material is hardly realistic as previously mentioned. As can be analyzed, these values are consistent with those studied by Alonso el al. [44]. Figure 7 shows the 3D

Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4277 failure surface obtained where the extent of the landslide can be clearly seen,13 which of 20 en- tirely affects the lutites unit and which acquires a spoon shape inserted in this strati- graphic unit.

FigureFigure 7. Sliding 7. Sliding surface surface obtained obtained by thethe numericalnumerical simulation simulation 3D. 3D.

A mainA main section section (marked (marked inin Figure Figure7) 7) allows allows the failurethe failure surface surface to be analyzed to be analyzed ( Figure 8(Figure). 8). In thisthis way,way, the the geomechanic geomechanic situation situation is obtainedis obtained using using the the geotechnical geotechnical parameters parameters indicated and researched for the level of lutites. A failure surface with a unit safety indicated and researched for the level of lutites. A failure surface with a unit safety coef- coefficient that indicates the strict balance of the mass considered in this calculation is ficientobtained. that indicates As can be seenthe fromstrict Figure balance8, the of breakage the mass occurs considered in the body in ofthis the calculation lutites, being is ob- tained.clearly As circular can be andseen being from delimited Figure 8, at the the breakage head by theoccurs highest in the area body (where of the the lutites, traction being clearlycracks circular were probably and being located delimited at the change at the inhe level,ad by and the a mainhighest scarp area as developed)(where the and traction crackson the were foot probably by the glacier. located This at the numerical change simulation in level, and is consistent a main scarp with as the developed) mobilized and on massthe foot deduced by the from glacier. the visual This field numerical inspection simulation and the morphology is consistent of the with current the slope.mobilized massThis deduced analysis from shows the that visual the retreat field inspecti of the glacieron and is the a key morphology point to trigger of the the current rupture: slope. This(a) analysis its formation shows eroded that the and retreat shaped of the the valley, glacier pronouncing is a key point the slope to trigger of the the foot rupture: of the (a) slope; (b) its retreat in the deglaciation phase was freeing the previously eroded foot until its formation eroded and shaped the valley, pronouncing the slope of the foot of the it controlled the exit of the failure circle. The level of retreat of the glacier at which the slope;breakage (b) its occurredretreat in is the certainly deglaciation variable phas withine was a reasonable freeing the range. previously However, eroded what foot can until be deduced from the numerical modeling is that, to obtain, by retroanalysis reasonable parameters with the geomechanical properties manifested in the lutites, its retreat to intermediate depths is necessary: (a) the consideration of the landslide at maximum height glacier is not reasonable, inducing a failure mechanism that is not consistent with the current topography; (b) for its part, the stability situation without a glacier would imply geomechanical conditions in the modeling much higher than expected, which are not reasonable. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 14 of 21

it controlled the exit of the failure circle. The level of retreat of the glacier at which the breakage occurred is certainly variable within a reasonable range. However, what can be deduced from the numerical modeling is that, to obtain, by retroanalysis reasonable pa- rameters with the geomechanical properties manifested in the lutites, its retreat to in- termediate depths is necessary: (a) the consideration of the landslide at maximum height glacier is not reasonable, inducing a failure mechanism that is not consistent with the

Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4277 current topography; (b) for its part, the stability situation without a glacier would14 of 20 imply geomechanical conditions in the modeling much higher than expected, which are not reasonable.

FigureFigure 8. Main 8. Main section section A-A’ A-A’ (marked (marked in in Figure Figure 77)) ofof thethe landslide landslide from from the the numerical numerical simulation. simulation.

5. Discussion:5. Discussion: Failure Failure Mechanism Mechanism of thethe Paleo-LandslidePaleo-Landslide within within the the Evolution Evolution and and DeglaciationDeglaciation of of the the Glacier Glacier of of the PicosPicos dede Urbi Urbiónón TheThe modeling modeling of of largelarge dormant dormant paleo-landslides paleo-landslides caused caused by glacier by retreatglacier or retreat any other or any othercause cause is a is task a task that that is frequently is frequently performed performed in order in toorder assess to the assess risk ofthe their risk stability.of their sta- bility.Retrospective Retrospective modeling modeling of large of prehistoric large prehistoric landslides landslides is less frequent, is less as it frequent, needs to recreate as it needs past geomorphological situations. Going one step further, the retrospective modeling of to recreate past geomorphological situations. Going one step further, the retrospective large paleo-landslides due to glacial retreat constitutes a new approach not yet addressed in modelingthe international of large scientificpaleo-landslides community. due This to qualitativeglacial retreat and quantitativeconstitutes approacha new approach implies not yeta addressed series of difficulties, in the international such as considering scientific the community. existence of This the glacierqualitative as if it and were quantitative active approachand the implies reconstruction a series of of the difficulties, geomorphology such as before considering and after the the existence glacier. Modeling of the glacier in as if itthis were case active can be and an the important reconstruction tool to know of the in detail geomorphology how the geomorphological before and after evolution the glacier. Modelingcould be in carried this case out during can be the an deglaciation important of tool the mountains.to know in We detail could how say that the it geomorpho- is a tool logicalapplied evolution to geomorphological could be carried sciences out andduring that the in many deglaciation cases it will of the not requiremountains. more We than could saya that good it geologicalis a tool applied and geomorphological to geomorphological mapping, sciences an intense and fieldthat in work many and cases the taking it will not of representative soil samples. Therefore, it is intended to achieve a geomorphological– require more than a good geological and geomorphological mapping, an intense field geotechnical conceptual model. work andThe the case taking studied of here representative constitutes a localsoil example,samples. but Therefore, also very representativeit is intended and to quiteachieve a geomorphological–geotechniuniversal, of a valley glacier, whichcal conceptual can occur inmodel. many other parts of the world’s mountains. The glacier on the north face of the Picos de Urbión had a length at its maximum advance of almost 4.8 km, and an ice surface of 3.9 km2. It extended from approximately 2200 to 1270 m, which is where it ended. This represents an average slope of 19%. The glacier was installed on a pre-existing valley, and it is very likely that the head of the valley was initially at a higher altitude. It is estimated that the Pico de Urbión was about 270 m higher, that is, at about 2400 m.a.s.l. This is explained, as happened in the nearby Neila Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4277 15 of 20

mountain range of similar geological structure [38], by the remontant erosive action of the glacier that caused the retreat of the rocky ledge at the top of conglomerates about 300–400 m to the south. It is not difficult to deduce it by prolonging to the north the dip of 8◦–9◦ that has the layer of conglomerates coinciding with the inclination of the back of the slope until the center of gravity of the glacial cirque where the watershed could be (according to the remains of the relief of the environment unaffected by the erosive action of glacial ice). This increase in height in mountains of medium altitude is important and favored the beginning of the glaciation. At the maximum glacial advance in the Urbion river valley, the ice of the cirques and the tongue ran through a moderately competent substrate of sandstones and lutites ((21) in Figure2). However, at an altitude of 1600 m, the softest layer (22) of clays and lutites appears along about 400 m of outcrop width on the left bank. The tongue over-excavated more easily in these materials, deepening the valley in this sector where the landslide is located, and giving rise, by differential erosion, to a rocky ridge transverse to the valley in the contact of the unit (21) with the (22). The transversal inclination of the slopes of the pre-glacial valley within the unit (22) had 14◦ and a drop of 300 m. The slope was stable. The excavation of the glacier increased the inclination at the bottom of the slope to 40◦. Extending the rectilinear inclinations of both slopes 14◦ downwards and seeing their intersection in the axis of the valley, it can be deduced that the glacier excavated about 75 m (Figure9(1)). The height of the slope went from 300 to 375 m. The glacier tongue was here about 140 m thick at the maximum advance of the glacier. After the deglaciation, the river deepened another 20 or 25 m more. The tongue smoothed the edges of the valley and deposited lateral moraines perched in three contiguous transverse valleys on the right bank and also on the left bank on the outcrop of the unit (23). Thanks to the location of these moraines, the limit of the maximum extension of the ice can be deduced. The ramming effect of the glacial tongue for thousands of years has compacted the materials of these moraines in such a way that they have remained stable as fillings in the middle of the slope with stable slopes of 40◦ since the last ice age. In addition, they have made the effect of a dam of loose materials, holding the thrust of the alluvial fills. This would be unthinkable in any artificial fill. Although it is not the subject of this work, according to the study of peatbogs in this mountain range [35], the maximum glacial advance in Urbión dates from 31,300 ka. A study has recently been carried out with dating techniques by cosmogenic exposure and geomorphological mapping in the neighboring Peña Negra glacier, located 9 km to the east and in the same orographic range and same orientation. This study indicates that the maximum glacial extent was approximately 18–20 ka, coinciding with the last glacial maximum (LGM). The results are classified as minimal by the authors and do not rule out the occurrence of a previous stage [46]. It seems to coincide with the rest of the studies of European and Spanish glaciers that started an intense deglaciation process around 21–19 ka [47,48]. This maximum advance is followed by a retreat of the ice. As the tongue receded, its thickness also decreased. In this way, the 40◦ slope was increasingly exhumed in a strip on both sides. This new steep slope in the lower part of the slope created an unfavorable situation in its stability. However, the glacier, for the moment, served as a retaining wall-wedge and prevented the slope from sliding. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 17 of 21

period the two head cirques were almost separated, leaving the right a moraine front that the erosion of stream dismantled in situ after the complete disappearance of the ice. During the mountain phases, the glacier was relegated to three or four snowfields in the shade of the large cirque, the largest being the one that has closed the Urbión lagoon. In the small cirque, there were three tiny snowfields that have also left their protalus. We are interested in indicating that it is possible that the river circulated above the foot of the landslide at first, but it gradually settled into the contact between it and the right slope between about 20 to 25 m, forming a V-shaped profile and in a scarp at along the foot of the landslide. The same happened with the associated alluvial fan, which also has a scarp of that height with respect to the current riverbed. This scarp indicates, on the Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4277 16 of 20 one hand, the relative antiquity of these two processes and, on the other, that the move- ment seems to be stabilized.

FigureFigure 9. 9.StepsSteps followed followed in in the the formation ofof thethe landslide: landslide: Above: Above: (A (A) Maximum) Maximum advance advance and and extent extent of the of glacier,the glacier, according ac- cordingto lateral to lateral moraines; moraines; (B) Retreat (B) Retreat of the glacierof the glacier to the rocky to the step rocky and step formation and formation of the landslide; of the landslide; (C) Follow (C) theFollow retreat the of re- the glacier. Formation of the alluvial fan induced by the landslide, eroding the head scarp. 1. Glacier; 2. Lateral moraines of glacial maximum; 3. Landslide; 4. Alluvial fan induced by landslide. Bottom: Profiles showing the previous phases: (0). Pre-glacial valley; (1). Maximum advance and excavation of the glacier; (2). Retreat of the glacier and decrease in the thickness of the tongue, leaving the moraines outcropping; (3). Landslide of the left slope with the lateral moraine. (21) Sandstones and lutites; (22) Lutites and clays; (23) limestones.

On the other hand, the altitude of the landslide site was below the perpetual snow limit during deglaciation and the ground water was not frozen, at least during the Summer season [33]. Therefore, the presence of the water table must be considered, whose effect is very important on the stability of the slope. The situation of the groundwater level of the slope in unit (22) is reflected in Figure9. The groundwater level, connected hydraulically with the glacier, was descending with time according to the descent of the ice level of the Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4277 17 of 20

tongue. We have to imagine a slope with a high water table and a large gradient, as at present, typical of poorly permeable materials and highly conditioned by the presence of springs at an elevation of 1720 m. It would however be well fed by the high rainfall and the melting of snow in Spring–Summer. Presumably, the pre-slide tension cracks would serve as an inlet for the recharge water. Modeling has shown that the slope lost its stability when the glacier, which served as its support, partially disappeared. The geometry of the slope, with the partial disappear- ance of the glacier, was very different from that of the pre-glacial valley: the unevenness had increased from 300 to 375 m as has been said, and the inclination in the 150–170 m of the lower part of the slope had passed from 14◦ to 40◦. The effect of the weight of the lateral moraine must also be considered as a destabilizing force, counteracted by its resistant effect. The landslide broke unit 4 on the left bank where it had an outcrop width and thickness greater than on the right bank. Finally, on this slope there was also a high and well-fed water table. There was a circular failure at the head, accommodating itself to the margin of freedom of the base and roof contacts, until reaching deep into the limestone, as a sliding zone that cannot break. The mobilized mass of ground included level 22 and the lateral moraine above it. In depth, and as the modeling shows, the failure occurred within the lutites. The presence of this limit of the limestone layer at depth prevented the formation of a deeper rotational slide with breakage below the topographic surface of the valley bottom, increasing friction and decreasing the movement of the mass. The landslide overflowed the limestone outcrop and invaded the valley bottom (Figure9(3)), moving the river 250 m to the west, as has been repeatedly said. The mass filled the over-excavated valley, but it did not climb the topographic step upstream and was unable to form a dam in the river. The creation of a barrier lake by landslide could have provided sediments for the dating of the landslide, but it is not the object of this work. Here the secondary effects and associated deposits caused or induced by this landslide are also observed, such as the construction of a lateral alluvial fan at the expense of the accelerated erosion of the denuded basin of the landslide by a small torrential water flow. It should be noted that this erosion was favored by the alteration of the lutites that outcropping in the header substrate, and that the fragments of lutites that make up the slipped mass show a significant degree of degradation. As has been seen in public works excavations in the area (dams, roads, etc.), humidity is the main cause of this alteration. Since the permeability is greater on the surface due to the decompression of the ground, the alteration decreases in the substrate with depth, so that at 4 or 5 m deep, the lutites are usually healthy. This does not happen in the slipped mass, which water can access more easily. This alteration process is also very fast, lasting weeks and months, and it is necessary that the concreting process of the civil engineering works be done after the excavation in a short time interval. This degradation constitutes an essential aspect in the geoconservation of dinosaur ichnite deposits located in the lutites of the area, and not so much in the sandstone layers [49,50]. This area of La Rioja, Soria, and Burgos form the largest dinosaur ichnite mega-deposit in the world. The glacier continued its retreat and was temporarily stabilized when the glacier over- mounted the topographic step located at 1600 m, which is where the glacier ended [31]. This stagnation meant that the glacier formed lateral moraines, well developed on the left and poorly on the right, since they are at +120 m over the valley bottom, and these at +30 m., which indicated that the tongue, already short, was asymmetrical, strongly conditioned by a reduced glacier much more fed by the blizzard on the left side. In this period the two head cirques were almost separated, leaving the right a moraine front that the erosion of stream dismantled in situ after the complete disappearance of the ice. During the mountain phases, the glacier was relegated to three or four snowfields in the shade of the large cirque, the largest being the one that has closed the Urbión lagoon. In the small cirque, there were three tiny snowfields that have also left their protalus. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4277 18 of 20

We are interested in indicating that it is possible that the river circulated above the foot of the landslide at first, but it gradually settled into the contact between it and the right slope between about 20 to 25 m, forming a V-shaped profile and in a scarp at along the foot of the landslide. The same happened with the associated alluvial fan, which also has a scarp of that height with respect to the current riverbed. This scarp indicates, on the one hand, the relative antiquity of these two processes and, on the other, that the movement seems to be stabilized.

6. Conclusions As is known, landslides caused by deglaciation processes are currently very frequent in the world due to the retreat of glaciers caused by global warming. In addition, a large part of the large paleo-landslides in the mountains are also due to the deglaciation of the last glacier. Retrospective studies of dormant paleo-landslides are of interest in applied geology to determine their stability in new situations of anthropic origin (incidence of an excavation, a new reservoir, etc.). Its modeling can be an important task that can help to know the details of the causes and mechanisms of their formation and, therefore, to know the risk of landslides of an area. The main contributions of this work are: 1. This is the first time that retrospective modeling of a landslide caused by the retreat of a glacier has been addressed. The example under study is very representative and universal of a valley glacier, and that can occur in many other parts of the mountains of the world; 2. Apart from issues related to natural risk, modeling is also of interest, as has been shown in this work, to help to know the details of how geomorphological evolution could be carried out during the deglaciation of the mountains. In the case studied, and associated with the deglaciation of the last glacial cycle, the retreat and consequent withdrawal of the tongue of the Pico de Urbión glacier, destabilized one of the slopes of the intermediate part of the valley. The valley had previously been deepened about 75 m by excavation in a soft substratum of lutites from the glacier, which, in this sector of the valley, reached 140 m of ice thickness. This landslide dragged the lateral moraine with it, which has nevertheless been preserved on the opposite slope. The modeling carried out perfectly confirms and quantifies the geomorphological evidence; 3. The application of retrospective modeling for these scientific studies without large budgets or with difficult access for prospecting (drilling, for example) is possible in many cases if you have a good geological and geomorphological mapping, an intense field work and taking representative samples. It is about taking advantage of all the evidence offered by the field and the geological conceptual model, as well as assessing the geotechnical meaning of the relief forms and the reconstruction by contour map of the geometry and geology before the landslide occurs. For this, the geomorphological history of the glacier and geological principles must always be taken into account.

Author Contributions: Conceptualization, P.S.d.O., E.S.P.; methodology, P.S.d.O., E.S.P.; software, R.G.; writing-original draft preparation, P.S.d.O., E.S.P.; writing—review and editing, R.G.; supervi- sion, C.S.R.; funding acquisition, C.S.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: This work was partially funded by the project C2004360097: P_LAND: Coupled simulation models based on particles: application to rapid landslides on slopes. Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable. Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable. Acknowledgments: This work was partially funded by the project C2004360097: P_LAND: Coupled simulation models based on particles: application to rapid landslides on slopes. We want to thank Valentín Guisande and Angel Mediavilla for providing the photos in Figure3B,C, respectively. We Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4277 19 of 20

also want to thank the three anonymous reviewers for the time and effort that they have taken to improve the manuscript. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References 1. McCalpin, J.P.; Irvine, J.R. Sackungen at the Aspen Highlands ski area, Pitkin County, Colorado. Environ. Eng. Geosci. 1995, 1, 277–290. [CrossRef] 2. Gutiérrez-Santolalla, F.; Acosta, E.; Ríos, S.; Guerrero, J.; Lucha, P. Geomorphology and geochronology of sackung features (uphill-facing scarps) in the Central Spanish Pyrenees. Geomorphology 2005, 69, 298–314. [CrossRef] 3. Jomard, H.; Lebourg, T.; Guglielmi, Y. Morphological analysis of deep-seated gravitational slope deformation (DSGSD) in the western part of the Argentera massif. a morphotectonic control? Landslides 2014, 11, 107–117. [CrossRef] 4. Ballantyne, C.K. Paraglacial geomorphology. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2002, 21, 1935–2017. [CrossRef] 5. Cossart, E.; Mercier, D.; Decaulne, A.; Feuillet, T. An overview of the consequences of paraglacial landsliding on deglaciated mountain slopes: Tipology, timing and contribution to cascading fluxes. Quaternaire 2013, 24, 13–24. [CrossRef] 6. Geertsema, M.; Chiarle, M. Mass movement causes: Glacier thinning. In Treatise on Geomorphology, Mountain and Hillslope Geomorphology; Shroder, J., Marston, R.A., Stoffel, M., Eds.; Elsevier: San Diego, CA, USA, 2013. 7. Zhang, Y.; Huang, C.; Pang, J.; Zhou, Y.; Shang, R.; Qiang, Z.; Yongqiang, G.; Tao, L.; Guiming, H. OSL dating of the massive landslide damming event in the Jishixia Gorge on the upper Yellow River, NE Tibetan Plateau. Holocene 2015, 25, 745–757. [CrossRef] 8. Guerrero, J.; Gutiérrez, F.; García-Ruiz, J.M.; Carbonel, D.; Lucha, P.; Arnold, L.J. Landslide-dam paleolakes in the Central Pyrenees, Upper Gállego River Valley, NE Spain: Timing and relationship with deglaciation. Landslides 2018, 15, 1975–1989. [CrossRef] 9. Schoeneich, P. La datation des glissements de terrain. In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Landslides, Christchurch, New Zealand, 10–14 February 1992. 10. Ballantyne, C.K.; Stone, J.O. Timing and periodicity of paraglacial rock-slope failures in the Scottish High-lands. Geomorphology 2013, 186, 150–161. [CrossRef] 11. Shroder, J.F.; Bishop, M.P. Mass movement in the Himalaya: New insights and research directions. Geomorphology 1998, 26, 13–35. [CrossRef] 12. Iturrizaga, L. Paraglacial landform assemblages in the Hindukush and Karakoram Mountains. Geomorphology 2008, 95, 27–47. [CrossRef] 13. McColl, S.T.; Fuller, I.C.; Anderson, B.; Tate, R. Hillslope failure and paraglacial reworking of sediments in response to glacier retreat, Fox Valley, New Zealand. In Proceedings of the 19th EGU General Assembly (EGU2017), Vienna, Austria, 23–28 April 2017. 14. Moragues, S.; Lenzano, M.G.; Moreiras, S.; Lenzano, L. Geomorfología paraglacial asociada a la inestabilidad de laderas en el brazo norte del lago argentino, Patagonia, Argentina. Cuad. Investig. Geográfica 2019, 45, 367–392. [CrossRef] 15. González Díez, A.; Salas, L.; Díaz de Terán, J.R.; Cendrero, A. Late Quaternary climate changes and mass movement frequency and magnitude in the Cantabrian region, Spain. Geomorphology 1996, 15, 291–309. [CrossRef] 16. Corominas, J. Influencia del glaciarismo cuaternario en la estabilidad de laderas del valle del Valira d’Orient (Andorra). In Proceedings of the I Reunión Nacional de Geomorfología, Teruel, Spain, 17–20 September 1990. 17. Corominas, J.; Alonso, E. Inestabilidad de Laderas en el Pirineo Catalán. Tipología y Causas. Escola Tècnica Superior de Camins, Canals i Ports, UPC. Cataluña, Spain. 1984. Available online: http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action= getRecordDetail&idt=8856256 (accessed on 1 January 2005). 18. García-Ruiz, J.M.; Valero-Garcés, B.L.; Martí-Bono, C.; González-Sempériz, P. Asynchroneity of maximum glacier advances in the central Spanish Pyrenees. J. Quat. Sci. 2003, 18, 61–72. [CrossRef] 19. Gutiérrez, F.; Linares, R.; Roqué, C.; Zarroca, M.; Rosell, J.; Galve, J.P.; Carbonell, D. Investigating gravitational grabens related to lateral spreading and evaporite dissolution subsidence by means of detailed zapping, trenching, and electrical resistivity tomography (Spanish Pyrenees). Lithosphere 2012, 4, 331–353. [CrossRef] 20. Corominas, J.; Iglésias, R.; Aguasca, A.; Mallorquí, J.J.; Fàbregas, X.; Planas, X.; Gili, J.A. Consideraciones sobre el deslizamiento del Forn de Canillo (Principa d’Andorra) a partir de datos de interferometría radar y nuevas observacions sobre el terreno. In Proceedings of the VIII Simposio Nacional sobre Taludes y Laderas Inestables, Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 11–14 June 2013. 21. Jaqués, I. Revisión del deslizamiento del Canillo, Andorra. Universitat de Barcelona, Enginyeria del Terreny, Cartogràfica i Geofísica, Cataluña, Spain. 2014. Available online: https://scholar.google.es (accessed on 18 June 2014). 22. Jarman, D. Rock slope failure and landscape evolution in the Caledonian mountains, as exemplified in the Abisko area, Northern Sweden. Geogr. Ann. 2002, 84A, 213–224. [CrossRef] 23. Sanz, P.; Sanz, E.; Menéndez-Pidal, I.; Galindo, R. Los movimientos en masa asociados a los depósitos morrénicos y áreas de cumbres de la Sierra de Urbión (Cordillera Ibérica). In Proceedings of the IX Simposio Nacional sobre Taludes y Laderas Inestables, Santander, Spain, 27–30 June 2017. 24. Dortch, J.M.; Owen, L.A.; Haneberg, W.C.; Caffee, M.W.; Dietsch, C.; Kamp, U. Nature and timing of large land-slides in the Himalaya and Transhimalaya of northern India. Quatern. Sci. Rev. 2009, 28, 1037–1054. [CrossRef] Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4277 20 of 20

25. Zhao, Y.; Xu, M.; Guo, J.; Zhang, Q.; Zhao, H.; Kang, X.; Xia, Q. Accumulation characteristics, mechanism, and identification of an ancient translational landslide in China. Landslides 2015, 12, 1119–1130. [CrossRef] 26. Zarroca, I.; Linares, R.; Roqué, C.; Rosell, J.; Gutiérrez, F. Integrated geophysical and morphostratigraphic approach to investigate a coseismic (?) translational slide responsible for the destruction of the Montclús village (Spanish Pyrenees). Landslides 2014, 11, 655–671. [CrossRef] 27. Sturzenegger, M.; Stead, D.; Gosse, J.; Ward, B.; Froese, C. Reconstruction of the history of the Palliser Rock-slide based on 36Cl terrestrial cosmogenic nuclide dating and debris volume estimations. Landslides 2014, 12, 1097–1106. [CrossRef] 28. Sanz de Ojeda, P.; Sanz, E.; Galindo, R.; Escavy, J.I.; Menéndez-Pidal, I. Retrospective analysis of the Pico del Castillo de Vinuesa large historical landslide (Cordillera Iberica, Spain). Landslides 2020, 17, 2837–2848. [CrossRef] 29. Camarero, J.J.; Gutiérrez, E. La respuesta del crecimiento de pinus uncinata al clima en poblaciones relictas del Sistema Ibérico. Zubia 2008, 20, 61–96. 30. García-Ruiz, J.M.; Ortigosa, L.; Pellicer, F.; Arnáez, J. Geomorfología glaciar del Sistema Ibérico. In Las Huellas Glaciares de Las Montañas Españolas; Universidad de Santiago de Compostela: Santiago de Compostela, Spain, 1998. 31. Carandell, J.; Gómez de Llarena, J. El Glaciarismo Cuaternario en los Montes Ibericos; Trabajos del Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales: Madrid, Spain, 1918; Available online: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/71512771.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2005). 32. Thornes, J.B. Glacial and periglacial features in the Urbión Mountains, Spain. Estud. Geol. 1968, 24, 249–258. 33. Sanz Pérez, E. Las Montañas de Urbión. Cebollera y Cabrejas. Geomorfología y Patrimonio Geológico; Diputación Provincial de Soria: Soria, Spain, 2001. 34. Vegas, J. Los Sistemas Lacustres de las Sierras de Neila y Urbión. Análisis Sedimentológico y Climático del Pleistoceno Superior y Holoceno. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 2001. 35. Vegas, J. Caracterización de eventos climáticos del Pleistoceno superior-Holoceno mediante el estudio sedimentológico de la Laguna Grande (Sierra de Neila, NO Sistema Ibérico). Rev. Soc. Geol. Esp. 2007, 20, 53–70. Available online: https: //sge.usal.es/archivos/REV/20(1-2)/Art04.pdf (accessed on 1 September 2007). 36. Gómez-Lobo, A. Historia de la Vegetación Durante los últimos 15.000 Años en los Picos de Urbión (Soria) en Base al Análisis Polínico. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Spain, 1993. 37. IGME: Instituto Geológico y Minero de España. Hoja Geológica Escala 1/50.000 nº 278 (Canales de la Sierra); Instituto Geológico y Minero de España: Madrid, Spain, 1978. 38. Sanz Pérez, E. Evolución y extensión del glaciarismo cuaternario de la Sierra de Neila (Cordillera Ibérica, Burgos). Geogaceta 2005, 37, 79–82. Available online: https://sge.usal.es/archivos/geogacetas/Geo37/Geo37-20.pdf (accessed on 1 September 2005). 39. Blair, T.; Mcpherson, J.G. Grain-size and textural classification of coarse sedimentary particles. J. Sediment. Res. 1999, 69, 6–19. [CrossRef] 40. Dikau, R.; Brunsden, D.; Schrott, L.; Ibsen, M.L. Landslide Recognition. In Identification, Movement and Causes. International Association of Geomorphologists; John Wiley and Sons: Chichester, UK, 1996. 41. Sanz Pérez, E. Caracterización de la recarga natural en los sistemas kársticos de Brieva de Cameros, Las Viniegras (La Rioja) y Fuente Negra (Burgos). Geogaceta 1996, 18, 1261–1263. Available online: https://sge.usal.es/archivos/geogacetas/Geo20%20(6) /Art04.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2005). 42. Sanz Pérez, E. Les systemes karstiques des Sierras de Urbion et de Neila, Burgos, Espagne. Hydrol. Sci. J. 1996, 41, 385–398. [CrossRef] 43. Sanz Pérez, E. El karst de la Sierra de Urbiôn (Burgos). Geogaceta 1994, 15, 86–89. Available online: https://sge.usal.es/archivos/ geogacetas/Geo15/Art24.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2005). 44. Alonso, E.; Pinyol, N. Informe Geotécnico: Embalse Castrovido; Confederación hidrográfica del Duero: Leon, Spain, 2009. 45. Serrano, A. Mecánica de rocas I y II; Publicaciones de la Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos de Madrid: Madrid, Spain, 1997. 46. García-Ruiz, J.M.; Palacios, D.; Fernández-Fernández, J.M.; Andrés, N.; Arnáez, J.; Gómez-Villar, A.; Santos-González, J.; Álvarez- Martínez, J.; Lana-Renault, N.; Léanni, L. Glacial stages in the Peña Negra valley, Iberian Range, northern IberianPeninsula: Assessing the importance of the glacial record in small cirques in a marginal mountain area. Geomorphology 2020, 362, 107195. [CrossRef] 47. Hughes, A.L.C.; Gyllencreutz, R.; Lohne, O.S.; Mangerud, J.; Svendsen, J.L. The last Eurasian ice-sheets—A chronological database and time-slice reconstruction, DATED-1. Boreas 2016, 45, 1–45. [CrossRef] 48. Oliva, M.; Palacios, D.; Fernández-Fernández, J.M.; Rodríguez-Rodríguez, L.; García –Ruiz, J.M.; Andrés, N.; Carrasco, R.M.; Pedraza, J.; Pérez-Alberti, A.; Valcárcel, M.; et al. Late Quaternary glacial phases in the Iberian Peninsula. Earth Sci. Rev. 2019, 192, 564–600. [CrossRef] 49. Caro, S.; Pavia, S. Alteración y conservación de los yacimientos de huellas de dinosaurios de La Rioja “La Virgen del Campo” (Enciso) y “La Era del Peladillo” (Igea). Zubia 1998, 16, 199–233. Available online: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo? codigo=110401 (accessed on 1 January 2005). 50. Garcıa-Ortiz, E.; Fuertes-Gutierrez, I.; Fernandez-Martinez, E. Concepts and terminology for the risk of degradation of geological heritage sites: Fragility and natural vulnerability, a case study. Proc. Geol. Assoc. 2014, 125, 463–479. [CrossRef]